|
PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
AS OF JUNE 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ALLDIGITAL
HOLDINGS,
INC.
|
|
|
BROADCAST
INT’L, INC.
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
NOTE#
|
|
|
COMBINED
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
$ |
912,400 |
|
|
$ |
686,347 |
|
|
$ |
1,650,000 |
|
|
1F |
|
|
$ |
3,248,747 |
|
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
|
|
107,728 |
|
|
|
93,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,107 |
|
|
INVENTORY
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
26,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,269 |
|
|
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
55,641 |
|
|
|
71,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,084 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,075,769 |
|
|
|
877,438 |
|
|
|
1,650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,603,207 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
97,811 |
|
|
|
108,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,036 |
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT OFFERING COSTS
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
(3,242 |
) |
|
1B |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
PATENTS, NET
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
127,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,382 |
|
|
DEPOSITS
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
115,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,017 |
|
|
INTANGIBLES - DOMAIN NAME
|
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,219,080 |
|
|
1G |
|
|
|
6,219,080 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,204,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,232,140 |
|
|
$ |
7,865,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,302,472 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED
EXPENSES
|
|
$ |
603,099 |
|
|
$ |
1,647,656 |
|
|
$ |
(1,391,872 |
) |
|
1C, 1D, 1E |
|
|
|
858,883 |
|
|
DEFERRED REVENUE
|
|
|
861,791 |
|
|
|
13,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875,330 |
|
|
CURRENT PORTION OF NOTES PAYABLE (NET
OF DISCOUNT OF $614,091)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,032,471 |
|
|
|
(5,032,471 |
) |
|
1C |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
DERIVATIVE VALUATION
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,275,275 |
|
|
|
(1,191,745 |
) |
|
1A |
|
|
|
83,530 |
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
1,464,890 |
|
|
|
7,968,941 |
|
|
|
(7,616,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,817,743 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
25,445 |
|
|
|
5,511,661 |
|
|
|
4,928,809 |
|
|
1A, 1C, 1D,
1F, 1G, 1H,
1I, 1J, 1K,
1L
|
|
|
|
10,465,915 |
|
|
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL
|
|
|
2,364,811 |
|
|
|
99,681,351 |
|
|
|
(102,046,162 |
) |
|
1H, 1L |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT
|
|
|
(2,650,652 |
) |
|
|
(111,929,813 |
) |
|
|
112,599,279 |
|
|
1B, 1E, 1I,
1J, 1K
|
|
|
|
(1,981,186 |
) |
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
(260,396 |
) |
|
|
(6,736,801 |
) |
|
|
15,481,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,484,729 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
$ |
1,204,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,232,140 |
|
|
$ |
7,865,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,302,472 |
|
Adjustments to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet
|
1A.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate estimated portion of derivative valuation of $1,275,275 related to warrants that are expected to be exchanged to common shares in the exchange offer. It is a condition to closing that all but 2,000,000 Broadcast warrants be converted to common shares. Assumes, based on internal projections of Broadcast, that 2,311,418 warrants out of total of 2,473,483 warrants are to be exchanged for to common shares and that 162,065arrants are not to be exchanged for common shares.
|
|
1B.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate debt offering costs of $3,242. |
|
1C.
|
Reflects the assumed conversion of all notes payable of $5,032,471 and related accrued interest of $368,761 to 12,475,024 shares per the merger agreement.
|
|
1D.
|
Reflects the conversion of accrued vacation of $60,481 to 105,220 common shares per the merger agreement. |
|
1E.
|
Reflects the reduction of accounts payable by $962,630 for discounts agreed to by Broadcast vendors. |
|
1F.
|
Reflects 6,151,012 shares issued for investments of $1,650,000 |
|
1G.
|
Records excess of consideration ($6,283,294) over identifiable net assets, resulting in goodwill of $6,219,080. |
|
1H.
|
Reflects the exchange pursuant to the merger agreement of 26,119,191 outstanding shares of AllDigital common stock for Broadcast common shares, which number represents 25,44,728 outstanding shares as of June 30, 2013 and an estimated 674,463 shares committed to be issued at or before closing.
|
|
1I.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to reclassify Broadcast accumulated deficit of $111,929,813 to common shares.
|
|
1J.
|
Records $129,002 value of 480,992 Broadcast common shares to be issued to investment banker Philadelphia Brokerage at closing.
|
|
1K.
|
Record estimated fee of $160,920 to investment banker Merriman.
|
|
1L.
|
Reflects the reclassification of additional paid-in-capital of $2,364,811 for AllDigital and $99,681,351 Broadcast to common stock as Utah does not recognize additional paid-in-capital.
|
|
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ALLDIGITAL
HOLDINGS,
INC.
|
|
|
BROADCAST
INT’L INC.
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
NOTE #
|
|
|
COMBINED
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$ |
3,307,167 |
|
|
$ |
7,523,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,830,791 |
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
2,486,388 |
|
|
|
4,819,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,306,012 |
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
820,779 |
|
|
|
2,704,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,524,779 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, MARKETING, AND ADVERTISING
|
|
|
600,789 |
|
|
|
1,908,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,509,552 |
|
|
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
|
|
|
1,587,445 |
|
|
|
5,104,760 |
|
|
|
289,922 |
|
|
2A, 2F |
|
|
|
6,982,127 |
|
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,754,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,754,163 |
|
|
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
2,188,234 |
|
|
|
8,767,686 |
|
|
|
289,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,245,842 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(1,367,455 |
) |
|
|
(6,063,686 |
) |
|
|
(289,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(7,721,063 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(1,542,424 |
) |
|
|
570,697 |
|
|
2B |
|
|
|
(971,839 |
) |
|
GAIN ON DERIVATIVE VALUATION
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8,829,748 |
|
|
|
(8,829,748 |
) |
|
2C |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
NOTE CONVERSION OFFERING EXPENSE
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(47,348 |
) |
|
|
47,348 |
|
|
2D |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
RETIREMENT OF DEBT OFFERING COSTS
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(53,150 |
) |
|
|
53,150 |
|
|
2E |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
DEBT CONVERSION COSTS
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,095,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,095,309 |
) |
|
GAIN ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,578,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,578,914 |
|
|
GAIN ON DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
195,521 |
|
|
|
(4,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,088 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
196,646 |
|
|
|
7,666,510 |
|
|
|
(8,158,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(295,397 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(1,170,809 |
) |
|
|
1,602,824 |
|
|
|
(8,448,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,016,460 |
) |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$ |
(1,173,209 |
) |
|
$ |
1,602,824 |
|
|
$ |
(8,448,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,018,860 |
) |
Adjustments to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
|
2A.
|
Records $129,002 value of 480,992 Broadcast common shares to be issued to investment banker Philadelphia Brokerage at closing.
|
|
2B.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate part of 2012 interest expense.
|
|
2C.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate 2012 gain on derivative valuation.
|
|
2D.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate 2012 note conversion offering expense.
|
|
2E.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate 2012 retirement of debt offering costs.
|
|
2F.
|
Record estimated expense of $160,920 to investment banker Merriman.
|
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2013
| |
|
ALLDIGITAL
HOLDINGS,
INC.
|
|
|
BROADCAST
INT’L, INC.
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
NOTE #
|
|
|
COMBINED
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$ |
2,038,294 |
|
|
$ |
2,455,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,493,520 |
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
1,217,977 |
|
|
|
1,573,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,791,879 |
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
820,317 |
|
|
|
881,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,701,641 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, MARKETING, AND ADVERTISING
|
|
|
215,841 |
|
|
|
185,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,849 |
|
|
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
|
|
|
900,023 |
|
|
|
1,778,205 |
|
|
|
289,922 |
|
|
3A, 3D |
|
|
|
2,968,150 |
|
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
394,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,313 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
1,115,864 |
|
|
|
2,357,526 |
|
|
|
289,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,763,312 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(295,547 |
) |
|
|
(1,476,202 |
) |
|
|
(289,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,061,671 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,125,183 |
) |
|
|
1,125,183 |
|
|
3B |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
LOSS ON DERIVATIVE VALUATION
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(25,606 |
) |
|
|
25,606 |
|
|
3C |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
GAIN ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
414,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414,484 |
|
|
LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(136,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,815 |
) |
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
66,847 |
|
|
|
4,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,203 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
66,937 |
|
|
|
(868,570 |
) |
|
|
1,150,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,156 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(228,610 |
) |
|
|
(2,344,772 |
) |
|
|
860,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,712,515 |
) |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$ |
(229,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,344,772 |
) |
|
$ |
860,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,713,315 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations for the three Months Ended March 31, 2013
|
3A.
|
Records $129,002 value of 480,992 Broadcast common shares to be issued to investment banker Philadelphia Brokerage at closing.
|
|
3B.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate Q1 2013 interest expense.
|
|
3C.
|
Reflects purchase accounting adjustment to eliminate Q1 2013 loss on derivative valuation.
|
|
3D.
|
Records estimated expense of $160,920 to investment banker Merriman.
|
MATERIAL CONTRACTS WITH ALLDIGITAL
Merger Agreement
For a description of the merger agreement, please see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement” beginning on page 57.
Professional Services Agreement
On January 6, 2013, concurrently with the execution of the merger agreement, Broadcast and AllDigital entered into a professional services agreement pursuant to which AllDigital and Broadcast agreed, among other things, that AllDigital would provide management support services, deal desk services, platform management services, operations management services, and accounting services to Broadcast. Broadcast agreed to a monthly fee to AllDigital in an amount to be determined following an initial evaluation period of 30 days for which AllDigital will be paid $60,000. The executive committee of Broadcast’s board of directors agreed to monitor AllDigital’s performance under the professional services agreement and Broadcast has certain termination rights if AllDigital fails to perform its obligations.
After the initial evaluation period, AllDigital submitted a proposal to Broadcast, which proposal Broadcast has not accepted. The current expectation is that no additional services will be provided under the professional services agreement.
Voting Agreements
Moreland Family, LLC, Legends Capital Group, Steven Ledger, Ray Phillip Zobrist, R. Phil and Janet Zobrist Family Trust, Trust Investments, James E. Solomon, Rodney Tiede and 5 Star LLC, some of which are or are affiliated with directors and officers of Broadcast and all of which are Broadcast stockholders, have each entered into a voting agreement with AllDigital dated January 6, 2013. In the voting agreement, such stockholders have each agreed to vote all shares of capital stock of Broadcast beneficially owned by them in favor of the merger, the adoption of the merger agreement, the approval of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, and against any alternative transaction with respect to Broadcast. As long as the voting agreements remain in effect, approximately 7.3% of the Broadcast common stock outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement is committed to be voted in favor of the merger-related proposals and the issuance of the Broadcast common stock pursuant to the merger agreement.
Paul and Kristen Summers Family Trust DTD 4/22/0, a stockholder affiliated with Paul Summers, Chief Executive Officer of AllDigital, has entered into a voting agreement with Broadcast dated January 6, 2013. In the voting agreement, such stockholder, which holds approximately 24.3% of the outstanding common stock of AllDigital (excluding warrants held by such stockholder), has agreed to vote all shares of capital stock of AllDigital beneficially owned by it in favor of the merger, the adoption of the merger agreement, the approval of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, and against any alternative transaction with respect to AllDigital.
Both voting agreements will terminate upon the earliest of: (a) the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms; or (b) the effectiveness of the merger. For more information regarding the voting agreements, see the section entitled “Voting Agreements” on page 74 of this prospectus.
The following table presents Broadcast’s capitalization as of June 30, 2013. You should read this table in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Broadcast” and Broadcast’s consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein.
| |
|
June 30,
2013
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
7,968,941
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 180,000,000 shares authorized; 110,233,225 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
5,511,661
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
99,681,351
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(111,929,813
|
)
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(6,736,801
|
)
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
1,232,140
|
|
Beneficial Ownership of Broadcast Shares. The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the eligible securities and of Broadcast’s common stock at August 15, 2013, by each Broadcast director or executive officer, each person known by Broadcast to own beneficially more than 5% of its common stock, and all Broadcast directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial Owner
|
Beneficial
Ownership of
Eligible
Warrants
|
Percent
of
Eligible
Warrants
|
Beneficial
Ownership
of Eligible
Options
|
Percent
of
Eligible
Options
|
Beneficial
Ownership
of Eligible
Notes
|
Percent
of
Eligible
Notes
|
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
(1)
|
Percent
of
Class
|
|
Gem Asset Management LC (2)
100 State Str. #2b
Teaneck, New Jersey 07666
|
4,733,333
|
12.1%
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
9.5%
|
14,199,999
|
12.1%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodney M. Tiede (3)
c/o Broadcast International, Inc.
6952 S. High Tech Drive, Suite C
Midvale, UT 84047-3772
|
|
|
50,000
|
3.5%
|
|
|
3,518,541
|
3.2%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leon Frenkel (4)
401 City Avenue, Suite 802
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
19.4%
|
6,982,276
|
6.1%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Phil Zobrist (5)
|
100,000
|
*
|
100,000
|
7.0%
|
|
|
2,079,919
|
1.9%
|
|
Donald Harris (6)
|
650,000
|
1.7%
|
|
|
4,200,000
|
20.0%
|
5,005,921
|
4.3%
|
|
James E. Solomon (7)
|
|
|
100,000
|
7.0%
|
|
|
662,500
|
*
|
|
William Boyd (8)
|
36,000
|
*
|
100,000
|
7.0%
|
|
|
641,553
|
*
|
|
Steven Ledger (9)
|
72,000
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
374,553
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons) (10)
|
5,591,333
|
14.2%
|
350,000
|
24.6%
|
10,200,000
|
49.0%
|
12,332,987
|
10.5%
|
* Represents less than 1% of Broadcast’s common stock outstanding.
|
(1)
|
Based on 110,233,225 shares of common stock outstanding, eligible warrants to purchase up to 39,243,956 shares of common stock outstanding, eligible options to purchase up to 1,422,033 shares of common stock outstanding and eligible notes to purchase up to 20,900,000 shares of common stock outstanding, in each case, as of August 15, 2013. Calculations for each holder include, as outstanding, all shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of derivative securities that are exercisable, convertible or subject to settlement within sixty days following August 15, 013 and held by such person but do not include shares subject to derivative securities held by others.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 7,466,666 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase 4,733,333 shares of common stock and secured convertible notes convertible into 2,000,000 shares of common stock. The control person of Gem Asset Management LC is Daniel Lewis.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes 500,000 restricted stock units, which are settled by the issuance of one share of common stock for each unit upon Mr. Tiede’s retirement from Broadcast and options to acquire 50,000 shares of common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 2,643,517 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase a total of 338,759 shares of common stock and an unsecured convertible note that is convertible into 4,000,000 shares of common stock.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 1,607,908 shares, options to acquire 100,000 shares, warrants to purchase 163,458 shares, and restricted stock units that may be settled by the issuance of 208,553 shares of common stock upon Mr. Zobrist’s retirement from the board of directors.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 155,921 restricted stock units, which are settled by the issuance of one share of common stock for each unit upon Mr. Harris’s retirement from the Board of Directors, secured convertible notes convertible into 4,200,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 650,000 shares of common stock.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes 12,500 shares of common stock, options to acquire a total of 100,000 shares of common stock and 550,000 restricted stock units, which are settled by the issuance of one share of common stock for each unit upon Mr. Solomon’s retirement from Broadcast.
|
|
(8)
|
147,000 shares of common stock, options to acquire a total of 100,000 shares of common stock, warrants to acquire 36,000 shares of common stock and 358,553 restricted stock units, which are settled by the issuance of one share of common stock for each unit upon Mr. Boyd’s retirement from the board of directors.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 144,000 shares of common stock, warrants to acquire 72,000 shares of common stock and 158,553 restricted stock units, which are settled by the issuance of one share of common stock for each unit upon Mr. Ledger’s retirement from the board of directors.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes warrants, options and restricted stock units to acquire a total of 7,403,038 shares of common stock held by all Broadcast directors and executive officers.
|
Beneficial Ownership of AllDigital Shares. The table below sets forth information, as of August 15, 2013, as to each person known to AllDigital who beneficially owns more than 5% of outstanding AllDigital common stock and information as to the ownership of AllDigital common stock by each named executive officer, each person serving as a director as of such date and all officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, all shares are owned directly, and the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to shares shown as beneficially being owned by them.
|
Name of Officer or Director or
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
Percentage of Class
|
|
|
5% Shareholder
|
|
Beneficial Ownership (1)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Summers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and 5% shareholder)
|
|
|
6,321,042
|
(2)
|
|
|
24.74
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Director, Vice President of Network Services and 5% shareholder)
|
|
|
6,320,877
|
(3)
|
|
|
24.74
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy Napoleon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Director, Chief Strategist and 5% shareholder)
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
23.58
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Walpuck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer and 5% shareholder)
|
|
|
1,668,958
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.20
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Williams (Director)
|
|
|
150,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All officers and directors as a group (5 persons)
|
|
|
20,460,877
|
|
|
|
74.98
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Based on 25,444,728 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 15, 2013. Calculations for each holder include, as outstanding, all shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants that are exercisable on or before October 15, 2013, and held by such person but do not include shares subject to options, warrants and other convertible or exercisable securities held by others.
|
| |
|
|
(2)
|
All such shares held of record by Paul and Kristen Summers Family Trust, Dated April 22, 2002. Mr. and Mrs. Summers have authority to vote and dispose of such shares. Includes warrants to purchase 107,014 shares of common stock.
|
| |
|
|
(3)
|
All such shares held of record by Steve James Smith Trust Dated October 24, 2002. Mr. Smith has the authority to vote and dispose of such shares. Includes warrants to purchase 106,959 shares of common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes warrants to purchase 95,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 1,383,958 shares of common stock vesting on or before October 15, 2013.
|
| |
|
|
(5)
|
Includes options to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock vesting on or before October 15, 2013.
|
Broadcast International, Inc. is a communications services and technology company headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Broadcast operates two divisions – BI Networks and CodecSys. Broadcast was incorporated in Utah in 1983 under the name “Laser Corporation,” but did not commence its current business until the year 2000.
Overview of BI Networks
Through BI Networks, Broadcast installs, manages and supports private communication networks for large organizations that have widely-dispersed locations or operations. Broadcast’s enterprise clients use these networks to deliver digital signage solutions, training programs, product announcements, entertainment and other communications to their employees and customers. Broadcast uses a variety of delivery technologies, including satellite, Internet streaming and WIFI, depending on the industry standard products and equipment sold by other companies.
In July 2009, Broadcast entered into a $10.1 million, three-year contract with Bank of America (“BofA”) to provide technology and digital signage services to approximately 2,100 of its more than 6,000 retail and administrative locations throughout North America. This digital signage network grew to approximately 2,500 retail banking sites. For the past three years this has been Broadcast’s largest customer, but in December, 2012, Broadcast was notified that a new vendor would begin servicing the customer. Broadcast’s contract with this customer expired on May 31, 2013. Because Broadcast will not continue with its largest customer, it must replace those revenues with new customers or significantly scale back its operations. Broadcast has developed certain media management software used in conjunction with supplying its BI Networks services which Broadcast believes has value aside from the customers served using the software.
BI Networks Products and Services
Following are some of the ways in which businesses utilize Broadcast’s products and services.
Internal Business Applications
|
|
·
|
Deliver briefings from the CEO or other management
|
|
|
·
|
Launch new products or services
|
|
|
·
|
Present new marketing campaigns
|
|
|
·
|
Announce significant changes or implement new policies and procedures
|
|
|
·
|
Respond to crisis situations
|
External Business Applications
|
|
·
|
Display advertising in public areas utilizing digital signage
|
|
|
·
|
Make promotional presentations to prospective customers or recruits
|
|
|
·
|
Provide product/service training to customers
|
|
|
·
|
Train and communicate with sales agents, dealers, VARs, franchisees, association members, etc.
|
|
|
·
|
Sponsor satellite media tours
|
|
|
·
|
Provide video/audio news releases
|
Network-Based Services
Broadcast utilizes satellite technology for various business training and communication applications. The list that follows describes the comprehensive offering of products and services that attracts companies in need of a satellite solution.
|
|
·
|
Network design and engineering
|
|
|
·
|
Equipment and installation
|
|
|
·
|
24/7 help desk services
|
|
|
·
|
On-site maintenance and service
|
|
|
·
|
Full-time or occasional satellite transponder purchases (broadcast time)
|
|
|
·
|
Uplink facilities or remote SNG uplink trucks
|
Streamed Video Hosting Services
With the advancement of streaming technologies and the increase of bandwidth, the Internet provides an effective platform for video-based business training and communications. Broadcast management believes that the Internet will become an increasing means of broadband business video delivery. Consequently, Broadcast has invested in the infrastructure and personnel needed to be a recognized provider of Internet-based services. Following are the services Broadcast currently provides:
|
|
·
|
High-speed, redundant Internet connection
|
|
|
·
|
Seamless links from client's website
|
|
|
·
|
Customized link pages and media viewers
|
|
|
·
|
Interactive discussion threads
|
|
|
·
|
Participation/performance reports for managers/administrators
|
|
|
·
|
Notification of participants via email
|
|
|
·
|
Pay-per-view or other e-commerce applications
|
Production and Content Development Services
To support both satellite and Internet-based delivery platforms, Broadcast employs professional production and content development teams and operates full service video and audio production studios. A list of support services follows:
|
|
·
|
In-studio or on-location video/audio production
|
|
|
·
|
Editing/post-production
|
|
|
·
|
Video/audio encoding for Internet delivery
|
|
|
·
|
Conversion of text or PowerPoint to HTML
|
|
|
·
|
Alternative language conversion
|
|
|
·
|
Access to “off-the-shelf” video training content
|
Service Revenue
Broadcast generates revenue by charging fees for the services it provides, and/or by selling equipment and satellite time. A typical satellite network generates one-time revenues from the sale and installation of satellite receivers and antennas and monthly revenues from network management services. On-site maintenance/service, production fees, and occasional satellite time are charged as they are used.
For Internet-based services, Broadcast charges customers monthly fees for hosting content, account management, quality assurance and technical support, if requested. For delivery of content, Broadcast generally charges a fee every time a person listens to or watches a streamed audio or video presentation. Encoding, production and content creation or customization are billed as these services are performed. Broadcast has also entered into content development partnerships with professional organizations that have access to subject matter experts. In these cases, Broadcast produces web-based training presentations and sells them on a pay-per-view basis, sharing revenues with the respective partner.
In the process of creating integrated technology solutions, Broadcast has developed proprietary software systems such as its content delivery system, incorporating site, user, media and template controls to provide a powerful mechanism to administer content delivery across multiple platforms and to integrate into any web-based system. Broadcast uses its content delivery system to manage networks of thousands of video receiving locations for enterprise clients.
The percentages of revenues derived from Broadcast’s different services fluctuate depending on the customer contracts entered into and the level of activity required by such contracts in any given period. Of Broadcast’s net sales in 2012 and 2011, and for the six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately 90% were derived from network management related services and approximately 10% were derived from product and content development and all other services.
Broadcast’s network management and support services are generally provided to customers by Broadcast operations personnel located at corporate headquarters. Broadcast’s production and content development services are generally provided by personnel from Broadcast’s production studio. Broadcast generally contracts with independent service technicians to perform installation and maintenance services at customer locations throughout the United States.
Overview of Video Compression
Video compression is the process by which video content is converted into a digital data stream for transmission over satellite, cable, Internet or wireless networks.
Video compression is generally accomplished by using a single technique or computer formula to create a particular data stream. As more and more video content is broadcast and streamed to a rapidly expanding based of new video receivers, such as cell phones, tablets, and notebook computers, the need to stream the video content with the highest possible quality and at the lowest possible bandwidth expands exponentially. At the same time traditional media desires to keep pace with the new media by transmitting higher and higher quality video to enhance the viewing experience of the consumer and we will experience the expansion of “smart televisions”, movies streamed in high definition and 3D, and entertainment streaming services to the home and computer, all of which increase the need to transmit video using the least amount of bandwidth possible without affecting the quality of the experience.
CodecSys Technology
Broadcast has patented its video compression technology and has trademarked it as “CodecSys.” Initially, Broadcast developed this technology for delivering video content for its network customers. However, this proprietary technology has expanded into a much wider application.
Video compression is generally accomplished by using a single technique or computer formula to create a particular data stream. Broadcast’s patented CodecSys technology is a software-based video operating system that uses multiple techniques or computer formulas to create a particular data stream. With CodecSys, video content may be transmitted over substantially decreased bandwidth while maintaining media quality. Broadcast believes that its CodecSys technology offers significant efficiencies and cost savings over traditional hardware solutions associated with video content transmission and storage.
Broadcast has developed a video encoding software product based upon its CodecSys technology that operates on multiple hardware platforms and is easily upgradable. In September 2009, CodecSys video encoding technology was certified by Microsoft as an approved software encoding system for use by IPTV providers that use Microsoft operating platforms. Broadcast’s CodecSys technology is the only software video encoding system certified by Microsoft.
In July 2010, Broadcast released CodecSys version 2.0, which has been installed in more than 30 large telecoms and labs for evaluation by potential customers. Up until the beginning of 2013, Broadcast continued to make sales presentations and respond to requests for proposals at other large telecoms, cable companies and broadcasting companies. These presentations have been made with Broadcast’s technology and sales channel partners, which include IBM, HP, Fujitsu and Microsoft, and others which are suppliers of hardware and software for video transmission applications. Because CodecSys is a software encoding and transcoding system, it is also ideal for “cloud-based” initiatives. In October 2011, CodecSys was selected as the compression technology to be used by Fujitsu for its NuVolo cloud based product offering.
In today's market, any video content to be distributed via satellite, cable, the Internet and other methods must be encoded into a digital stream using any one of numerous codecs. The most commonly used codecs are now MPEG2, MPEG4, and H.264. When new codecs are developed that perform functions better than the current standards, all of the video content previously encoded in the old format must be re-encoded to take advantage of the new codec. Broadcast’s CodecSys technology eliminates obsolescence in the video compression marketplace by integrating new codecs into its library. Using a CodecSys switching system to utilize the particular advantages of each codec, Broadcast may utilize any new codec as it becomes available by including it in the application library. Codec switching can happen on a scene-by-scene or even a frame-by-frame basis.
Broadcast believes the CodecSys technology represents an unprecedented shift from currently used technologies for two important reasons. First, CodecSys allows a change from using only a single codec to compress video content to using multiple codecs and algorithms in the compression and transmission of content. The CodecSys system selects dynamically the most suitable codecs available from the various codecs stored in its library and matches the codecs with various video settings to compress a single video stream. As a video frame, or a number of similar frames (a scene), is compressed, CodecSys applies the optimized codec from the library that best compresses that content and matches the codec with the appropriate setting to then perform the compression. CodecSys repeats the selection throughout the video encoding process, resulting in the use of numerous codecs on a best performance basis. The resulting file is typically substantially smaller than when a single codec compression method is used.
The second important distinction is that CodecSys is a software encoding system that can be upgraded and improved without changing the hardware on which it is resident, much as a personal computer can have its application software upgraded and changed without replacing the equipment. In addition, CodecSys software can run equally efficiently on different manufacturers’ equipment. For example, using the Intel chip currently employed by Broadcast, the CodecSys encoding system can run equally as well on IBM equipment and HP equipment, which expands Broadcast’s potential market of customers and opens the possibility of different sales channels as Broadcast software can be sold by IBM sales people as well as HP sales people. In addition, most video encoders currently utilize an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip as the encoding engine and when new developments are made, the customer must purchase new hardware to take advantage of the changes. Having a software based encoding system means that new changes in technology and encoding algorithms can be downloaded remotely to upgrade the encoding system on the customers already resident hardware. Broadcast believes that having a software based encoding product will slow hardware obsolescence for the customer and be a competitive advantage for CodecSys.
CodecSys Products and Services
In November 2007, Broadcast entered into a two-year license agreement with IBM pursuant to which Broadcast licensed its patented CodecSys technology for use by IBM in selling video encoding solutions using IBM’s Cell-BE processing chip. The IBM agreement was Broadcast’s first significant license of the CodecSys technology for use in a commercial application. In connection with this license, Broadcast increased its engineering staff, acquired additional equipment to facilitate the development process, purchased additional codecs for use in its encoding system and engaged outside engineering firms to perform development services. The initial version of a video encoder running on the IBM platform was completed in a commercially deployable form for sales in 2009, although additional development work was required.
After Broadcast had completed substantially all of its development work on the IBM Cell-BE processor chip in the first half of 2009, IBM sales efforts using the Cell-BE processor chip were redirected to products not employing the Cell-BE processor chip. At approximately the same time, Intel released a newly developed operating chip with sufficient processing capacity to perform the multiple functions required by CodecSys to which Broadcast redirected its development efforts. This chip is based on x86 architecture, which is the standard in the industry acceptable to almost all users, and it is easier to program applications to this architecture. Although Broadcast’s license agreement with IBM has expired, IBM made hardware sales presentations utilizing CodecSys technology based upon the Intel chip. The initial version of the CodecSys video encoding system utilizing the Intel chip was first ready for sales presentations and testing in the fourth quarter of 2009, but the CodecSys version 2.0, the first commercial version of the software hardened for sales and deployment was not ready for sales installation until July 1, 2010. All sales anticipated in the future will be made using the Intel chip.
The IBM media room products consist of servers and control and management software used by broadcasters and other distributors of video content over a variety of delivery platforms. Using CodecSys as an integral part of the product offering gives IBM and other hardware providers an additional product that is sold in the same process as its media room offering. Currently, IBM has installed CodecSys based software in “proof of concept” systems at customer locations for the customers to test and evaluate the quality, speed, and bandwidth requirements of Broadcast’s software encoding solution.
Because Broadcast now has its CodecSys technology resident on the Intel chip, it is able to market with other manufacturers of computer equipment such as HP. Broadcast has made sales presentations to HP customers in conjunction with HP, which has also selected Broadcast’s video encoding solution as a solution that it will present to its customers. This has occurred primarily because CodecSys is the only software based encoding system available that will operate on HP hardware platforms and is the only solution that will operate in a cloud computing environment.
In September 2009, Broadcast’s CodecSys encoding system was certified by Microsoft as an approved software encoding system for use by IPTV providers, which use Microsoft Media Room software in their delivery and management of their IPTV systems. It was the only software video encoding system certified by Microsoft that can be used on a variety of hardware platforms. The certification has been a source of sales and marketing leads from Microsoft customers desiring encoding solutions for their projects.
In October 2011, Fujitsu North America, after fully testing and evaluating CodecSys and its competitors, selected CodecSys as the compression technology to be employed by Fujitsu in its NuVolo cloud based initiative. The first sale of CodecSys resident on Fujitsu hardware was completed in November 2011. The customer is a small cable company that desired to launch an over the top (OTT) network for its cable customers to allow the subscribers to get the cable company content not only through the hardwired cable network, but also through the Internet and wirelessly to cell phones. The network was launched in December 2011. Although the customer is relatively small and the revenues generated on a monthly basis are not significant, the sale was important for two reasons. The first is that, although CodecSys has been tested in labs and at potential customers’ locations for two years without material deficiencies being noted by the customers or the channel partners, this is the first time it has been installed and is operational for the benefit of end users. The second is that the pricing structure put in place as Broadcast has gone to market has been validated as a reasonable and cost effective product offering that is competitive with the traditional encoding hardware products currently sold in the video distribution marketplace. The relationship between Broadcast and Fujitsu was terminated during the first quarter of 2013.
In December 2011, IBM introduced its video encoding and transcoding service that is accomplished through the Internet cloud. The encoding engine for this service is CodecSys. Broadcast will derive revenue from the service based on the amount of the video encoded by IBM’s customers, although to date Broadcast has received no revenue from this new application of its technology.
Until the beginning of 2013, Broadcast continued to develop the CodecSys technology for a variety of applications, including Internet streaming, cable and satellite broadcasting, IPTV and transmitting video content to cellular phones and other hand-held electronic devices. Commercialization and future applications of the CodecSys technology are expected to require additional development capital estimated to be approximately $2.0 million annually. This estimate may increase or decrease depending on specific opportunities and available funding. Because Broadcast has not had access to the necessary capital, it has had to curtail its development activities.
Research and Development
Broadcast has spent substantial amounts in connection with its research and development efforts. These efforts have been dedicated to the development and commercialization of the CodecSys technology. Because the majority of the development work for CodecSys has been completed, Broadcast has steadily decreased those expenditures from $2,711,933 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $2,410,249 for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $1,754,163 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Broadcast’s development expenses continued to decrease from $464,847 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $168,939 for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Broadcast’s cash resources are not sufficient to support future research and development activities unless it raises additional capital or succeeds in generating revenues from sales of CodecSys products. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Broadcast – Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
Intellectual Property Protection
Broadcast’s patent and intellectual property strategy is of critical importance. Two provisional patents describing the technology were filed on September 30, 2001. Broadcast has filed for patent protection in the United States and various foreign countries. Broadcast’s initial U.S. patent related to the CodecSys technology was granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or PTO, in August 2007. Four additional patents have been issued by the PTO. As of June 30, 2013, Broadcast also had eleven patents issued in foreign countries and 20 pending patent applications, including U.S. and foreign counterpart applications and continuations.
Broadcast has identified additional applications of the technology, which represent potential patents that further define specific applications of the processes that are covered by the original patents. Broadcast intends to continue building its intellectual property portfolio as development continues and resources are available.
Broadcast has registered the “CodecSys” trademark with the PTO, and seeks to protect its know-how, trade secrets and other intellectual property through a variety of means, including confidentiality agreements with its employees, customers, vendors, and others.
Major Customers
A small number of customers account for a large percentage of Broadcast’s revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, 86% and 87%, respectively, of Broadcast’s revenues were from its largest customer. For the year ended December 31, 2012, 85% of Broadcast’s revenues were from its largest customer compared to 89% from this customer for the year ended December 31, 2011. Broadcast’s contract with this customer expired on May 31, 2013. As a result, Broadcast’s revenues from this customer will be substantially reduced during 2013.
Any material reduction in revenues generated from this customer could harm Broadcast’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Broadcast’s largest customer has elected not continue to purchase Broadcast services, decreasing its annual level of purchases from Broadcast from approximately $6,300,000 to approximately $0 on an ongoing basis. This decrease in revenues will materially affect Broadcast’s business unless it can replace that customer with other significant customers.
Competition
The communications industry is extremely competitive. In the private satellite network market, there are many firms that provide some or all of the services Broadcast provides. Many of these competitors are larger than Broadcast and have significantly greater financial resources. In the bidding process for potential customers, many of Broadcast’s competitors have a competitive advantage in the satellite delivery of content because many own satellite transponders or otherwise have unused capacity that gives them the ability to submit lower bids than Broadcast is able to make. In the satellite network and services segment, Broadcast competes with Convergent Media Systems, Globecast, IBM, Cisco, TeleSat Canada and others. With respect to video conferencing, Broadcast competes with Sony, Polycom and others.
There are several additional major market sectors in which Broadcast plans to compete with its CodecSys technology, all with active competitors. These sectors include the basic codec technology market, the corporate enterprise and small business streaming media market, and the video conferencing market. These are sectors where Broadcast may compete by providing direct services. Competition in these new market areas will also be characterized by intense competition with much larger and more powerful companies, such as Microsoft and Yahoo, which are already in the video compression and transmission business. Many of these competitors already have an established customer base with industry standard technology, which Broadcast must overcome to be successful.
The video encoders to be sold by IBM and HP will compete directly against video encoders manufactured and sold by a number of competitors, including Erickson/Cisco, Harmonic Scientific Atlanta, Motorola, and Thomson. Neither IBM nor HP have ever produced a video encoder to compete in this market. Broadcast’s marketing partners have not been successful in entering this new market, and Broadcast has not derived the amount of licensing revenue originally anticipated by management.
On a technology basis, CodecSys competition varies by market sector, with codecs and codec suppliers like Microsoft Windows Media Player, Real Networks’ Real Player, Apple, QuickTime, MPEG2, MPEG4, On2, DivX and many others. There are several companies, including Akamai, Inktomi, Activate and Loudeye, that utilize different codec systems. These companies specialize in encoding, hosting and streaming content services primarily for news/entertainment clients with large consumer audiences. Broadcast competes directly with the two companies in the broadcast media encoding market that have the largest market share, Erickson/Cisco and Harmonic. In addition, Broadcast competes with Cisco, Harris Corporation, and with many other smaller companies. Most are larger than Broadcast and most have greater financial resources than it has.
Competition in the digital signage business is extremely widespread with competitors in almost every pricing strata. The industry is fragmented with many providers as there is a relatively low cost of entry into the market with many companies developing a new piece of software and immediately there is another competitor. Large companies such as Harris Corporation and Cisco have digital signage offerings among there many other products. Scala and Fourwinds Interactive are among the many smaller digital signage companies that offer are primarily digital signage software and service to the general business community and with which Broadcast most often competes.
Employees
Broadcast currently employs 6 full-time personnel at its executive offices and studio facilities in Salt Lake City, Utah Broadcast engages independent contractors and employs the services of independent sales representatives as well as voice and production talent on an “as needed” basis at its recording studios.
Government Regulation
Broadcast has seven licenses issued by the Federal Communications Commission for satellite uplinks, Ethernet, radio connections and other video links between Broadcast facilities and third-party uplinks. Notwithstanding these licenses, all of Broadcast’s activities could be performed outside these licenses with third-party vendors. All material business activities are subject to general governmental regulations with the exception of actual transmission of video signals via satellite.
Properties
Broadcast’s executive offices are located at 6952 S. High Tech Drive, Suite C, Midvale, Utah 84047-3772, which consists of approximately 1,200 square feet of space leased under a lease, the term of which ends on December 31, 2013, at a rate of approximately $4,000 per month plus utilities. Broadcast has no other properties.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – BROADCAST
The following discussion of Broadcast’s financial condition and results of operations should be read together with its consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Broadcast’s actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” or in other parts of this prospectus. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Critical Accounting Policies
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Broadcast considers all cash on hand and in banks, and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, and at June 30, 2013 and 2012, Broadcast had bank balances in the excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Broadcast has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Current financial market conditions have had the effect of restricting liquidity of cash management investments and have increased the risk of even the most liquid investments and the viability of some financial institutions. Broadcast does not believe, however, that these conditions will materially affect its business or its ability to meet its obligations or pursue its business plans.
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received.
A trade receivable is considered to be past due if any portion of the receivable balance is outstanding for more than 90 days. After the receivable becomes past due, it is on non-accrual status and accrual of interest is suspended.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the property, generally from three to five years. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred except when such repairs significantly add to the useful life or productive capacity of the asset, in which case the repairs are capitalized.
Patents and Intangibles
Patents represent initial legal costs incurred to apply for United States and international patents on the CodecSys technology, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of approximately 20 years. Broadcast has filed patent applications in the United States and foreign countries. As of June 30, 2013, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or PTO had approved six patents and a seventh has been approved awaiting a patent number. Additionally, eleven foreign countries had issued patents and Broadcast had 20 pending patent applications, including U.S. and foreign counterpart applications. While Broadcast is unsure whether it can develop the technology in order to obtain the full benefits of the issued patents, the patents themselves hold value and could be sold to companies with more resources to complete the development. On-going legal expenses incurred for patent follow-up have been expensed from July 2005 forward and in 2011 Broadcast abandoned two foreign patent applications and incurred a charge of $26,180.
Long-Lived Assets
Broadcast reviews its long-lived assets, including patents, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future un-discounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, then the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Fair value is determined by using cash flow analyses and other market valuations.
After Broadcast’s review at June 30, 2013, it was determined that no adjustment was required.
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the awards, and recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award for awards expected to vest.
Income Taxes
Broadcast accounts for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Revenue Recognition
Broadcast recognizes revenue when evidence exists that there is an arrangement between it and its customers, delivery of equipment sold or service has occurred, the selling price to customers is fixed and determinable with required documentation, and collectability is reasonably assured. Broadcast recognizes as deferred revenue, payments made in advance by customers for services not yet provided.
When Broadcast enters into a multi-year contract with a customer to provide installation, network management, satellite transponder and help desk, or combination of these services, it recognizes this revenue as services are performed and as equipment is sold. These agreements typically provide for additional fees, as needed, to be charged if on-site visits are required by the customer in order to ensure that each customer location is able to receive network communication. As these on-site visits are performed the associated revenue and cost are recognized in the period the work is completed. If Broadcast installs, for an additional fee, new or replacement equipment to an immaterial number of new customer locations, and the equipment immediately becomes the property of the customer, the associated revenue and cost are recorded in the period in which the work is completed.
In instances where Broadcast has entered into license agreements with a third parties to use its technology within their product offering, it recognizes any base or prepaid revenues over the term of the agreement and any per occurrence or periodic usage revenues in the period they are earned.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject Broadcast to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable. In the normal course of business, Broadcast provides credit terms to its customers. Accordingly, Broadcast performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for possible losses which, when realized, have been within the range of management’s expectations.
In the six months ended June 30, 2013, Broadcast had one customer that individually constituted 87% of its total revenues compared to 86% for the same customer for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and for the full years 2012 and 2011, that customer individually constituted 85% and 89%, respectively of Broadcast’s total revenues, with no other single customer representing more than 5% of total revenues. Broadcast’s contract with this largest customer expired on May 31, 2013 after Broadcast was notified that the customer had chosen a new vendor for all of the services Broadcast had been providing.
Weighted Average Shares
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, plus the dilutive common stock equivalents that would rise from the exercise of stock options, warrants and restricted stock units outstanding during the period, using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the period, plus the effect of assuming conversion of the convertible debt. The computation of diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion or exercise of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings.
Advertising Expenses
Broadcast follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Broadcast has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Executive Overview
The current recession and market conditions have had substantial impacts on the global and national economies and financial markets. These factors, together with soft credit markets, have slowed business growth and generally made potential funding sources more difficult to access. Broadcast continues to be affected by prevailing economic and market conditions, which present considerable risks and challenges.
Because Broadcast has not been successful in deploying its CodecSys technology with customers sufficient to achieve a breakeven and is finding it difficult to raise additional investment capital, Broadcast determined that it should seek an alternative to continuing to commercialize CodecSys by itself. Accordingly, Broadcast sought a merger partner that has compatible video broadcasting products and services, with which it could integrate its CodecSys encoding system. In January 2013, Broadcast entered into the merger agreement with AllDigital. On February 8, 2013, AllDigital notified Broadcast that Broadcast was in breach of certain covenants regarding unencumbered ownership or potential claims against its technology, and gave Broadcast 30 days to cure the alleged defects before the merger agreement could be terminated. On March 8, 2013 AllDigital notified Broadcast that sufficient progress had been made that the cure period was extended to April 8, 2013 and later to May 8, 2013 for the remainder of the alleged defects to be cured or waived. On April 10, 2013, the parties entered into an amendment to the merger agreement which (i) provides that either party may terminate the Merger Agreement upon 3 days notice, with or without cause, without liability, (ii) eliminates the cure period date requirement and (iii) removes the “No Shop” provision preventing Broadcast from contacting other potential purchasers or merger partners. On June 30, 2013, Broadcast entered into a second amendment to the merger agreement which (i) increases the percentage of our outstanding common stock AllDigital’s shareholders would receive in the merger from 54% to 58%, (i) modifies a number of the closing conditions of the merger, including the working capital and net cash flow require, (iii) adds a new closing condition that Broadcast have post-merger financing commitments in place for the purchase of no less than $1.5 million, nor more than $3.5 million, of Broadcast’s common stock, (iv) extends the “end date” (a date upon which either party may terminate the merger agreement if the merger has not been consummated) from July 31, 2013 to October 31, 2013, (v) eliminates one of Broadcast’s existing directors from the post-closing board of directors such that the post-closing directors are expected to be Donald A. Harris, Paul Summers, David Williams and up to two additional directors mutually approved by Broadcast and AllDigital prior to the closing of the merger and (vi) changes the reverse stock split ratio from a 10 to 1 reverse stock split to a 15 to 1 reverse stock split. On July 9, 2013, Broadcast filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-189869) with the SEC in connection with the anticipated merger. On August 26, 2013, Broadcast and AllDigital entered into a third amendment to the merger agreement which (i) amends the closing condition that Broadcast have post-merger financing commitments in place for the purchase of no less than $1.5 million, nor more than $3.5 million to provide that the minimum commitments will instead be the difference between $1.5 million and the principal amount of the combined convertible notes, (ii) excludes shares issuable upon conversion of the combined convertible notes from the calculation of fully diluted capital stock for both Broadcast and AllDigital for purposes of determining relative ownership upon closing of the merger, (iii) adds a condition that no one but Broadcast shall have any ownership interest in any intellectual property or intellectual property rights at any time owned or supplied by Broadcast, as determined by AllDigital in its reasonable discretion, and (iv) eliminates the ability of either party to terminate the merger agreement without cause on three days advance written notice and with no further liability to the other party.
During 2009, Broadcast decreased certain of its development activities and expenses notwithstanding the need to refocus and develop its CodecSys technology on a different platform using a newly announced Intel operating chip. Even with decreased engineering staff and certain related development employees, Broadcast was able to complete its video encoding system utilizing the Intel chip, prepare its CodecSys technology for installation on both the IBM and HP equipment platforms, and become certified by Microsoft as an approved software video encoding system for use by IPTV providers using Microsoft operating platforms. On July 1, 2010, Broadcast released CodecSys 2.0, which has been installed in various large telecoms and labs for evaluation by potential customers. In 2011 Broadcast continued development of additional sales channel partners by integrating CodecSys on hardware manufactured and sold by Fujitsu, which, before termination of the relationship between Broadcast and Fujitsu, adopted CodecSys as its compression technology for use in its NuVolo cloud initiative. Until the beginning of 2013, Broadcast continued to make sales presentations and respond to requests for proposals at other large telecoms, cable companies and broadcasting companies. These presentations were made with Broadcast’s technology partners which are suppliers of hardware and software for video transmission applications in media room environments such as IBM, HP and Microsoft. In October 2011, Broadcast completed its first sale of CodecSys to a small cable operator in Mexico as part of its OTT product offering operating on Fujitsu hardware. The sale demonstrates that the CodecSys product offering does operate to its operating specifications in a working environment, which Broadcast believes will help in its sales and marketing efforts.
On July 31, 2009, Broadcast entered into a $10.1 million, three-year contract with Bank of America, a Fortune 10 financial institution, to provide technology and digital signage services to approximately 2,100 of its more than 6,000 retail and administrative locations throughout North America. For the year ended December 31, 2012, Broadcast realized approximately $6,386,903 from this contract, which constituted approximately 85% of its revenues for the period. For the year ended December 31, 2011, Broadcast realized approximately $7,540,025 in revenue from this contract, which contributed approximately 89% of its revenues for the year. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, Broadcast realized approximately $2,148,313 in revenue compared to $3,212,332 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, which constituted 87% and 86% of its total revenues respectively. The contract with Broadcast’s largest customer expired in May 2013, and Broadcast expects that its revenues will be substantially less going forward unless it can secure contracts which can replace the revenue lost from this largest customer.
Broadcast’s revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2013 decreased by approximately $264,528 compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2012. Even with the decrease in its revenues, Broadcast realized an increase of approximately $203,395 in its gross margin for the three months ended March31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 due primarily to cost cutting efforts, but it continues to deplete its available cash and needs future equity and debt financing because it continues to spend more money that it generates from operations. To fund operations, Broadcast has engaged in the transactions described below under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Results of Operations for the Six Months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012
Net Sales
Broadcast generated $2,455,226 in net sales during the six months ended June 30, 2013. During the same six-month period in 2012, Broadcast generated net sales of $3,745,085. The decrease in revenue of $1,289,859 was due primarily to the loss of Broadcast’s largest customer. Revenues from Broadcast’s largest customer decreased by $1,061.550, which accounted for 82% of the total decrease in revenues. In addition, web hosting and streaming revenues from one other customer of $132,000 in 2012 were not repeated in 2013.
Sales revenues from Broadcast’s largest customer, which it will no longer service in the future, accounted for approximately 87% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and approximately 86% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Broadcast will no longer be servicing this customer in the future, which makes restructuring its costs imperative until the merger with AllDigital is completed or Broadcast secures new customers to replace lost revenues.
Costs of sales decreased by approximately $1,017,556 to $1,573,902 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from $2,591,458 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The gross margin from operations decreased $272,303 from a gross margin of $1,153,627 in the sex months ended June, 2012 to a gross margin of $881,324 for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to less installation activity for our largest customer’s digital signage network and other smaller customers, which accounted for approximately $432,500 of the total decrease in the cost of revenues and a decrease in the general operations department costs of $189,704, due to cost savings measures including reducing the number of Broadcast’s employees. Although the sales and cost of sales decreased, the gross margin from operations increased primarily due to cost reduction measures implemented.
General and Administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $1,628,325 compared to $2,588,601 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease of $960,276 resulted primarily from decreases totaling $432,101 in employee and related expenses due to a reduction in the number of employees and a reduction in salaries for some executives, $217,528 in consulting fees, , 205,260 in temporary help, $190,979 in trade show and convention related expenses, $119,956 in granted option and warrant expenses and a reduction of $76,000 in director fees.. Most of these reductions were the result of the reduction in activity due to the loss of Broadcast’s largest customer for which Broadcast ceased performing any material services at the end of May. The total reductions were partially offset by an increase of $170,412 in legal and other professional expenses related primarily to the proposed merger with AllDigital. Research and development in process decreased by $627,100 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $394,313 from $1,021,414 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The development expenditures have been significantly curtailed in view of the proposed merger and cessation of sales efforts of the CodecSys products. the decrease resulted primarily from a decrease of $197,649 in employee related expenses reflecting a decrease in the number of employees, a decrease of $197,034 in tradeshow and convention related expenses, and a decrease of $124,447 in consulting fees. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $930,232 to $185,008 for the six months ending June 30, 2013 from $1,115,240 for the six months ending June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily a result of decreased employee related expenses of $495,661 and a decrease in conventions and related travel expenses of $281,184, which were the result of reducing staff and sales efforts of the CodecSys products and services.
Even with the reduced revenue, due to a reduction of operating expenses as explained above, Broadcast’s operating loss decreased $2,422,101 from an operating loss of $3,898,303 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to an operating loss of $1,476,202 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, Broadcast incurred interest expense of $1,125,183 compared to interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $606,211. The increase of $518,972 resulted primarily from interest expense of approximately $202,825 related to the interest on Broadcast’s senior secured convertible notes, most of which were outstanding for the first six months of 2013, and note accretion of $832,799 on Broadcast’s senior secured convertible notes and its unsecured convertible note.
Broadcast realized a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $2,344,772 compared with net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $661,715 resulting in an aggregate reduction of $3,006,487. The increase in net loss resulted primarily from a reduction of $4,614,086 in income related to Broadcast’s derivative valuation gain calculation. In addition, the gain from the extinguishment of debt decreased by $1,258,091. These elements that increased the net loss were partially offset by a decrease in Broadcast’s operating loss of $2,422,101 as explained above due to cost reduction efforts and the expense of $1,095,309 incurred for costs related to the issuance of warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2012 that were not repeated in 2013.
Results of Operations for the Three Months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012
Net Sales
Broadcast generated $974,656 in revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2013. During the same three-month period in 2012, Broadcast generated revenue of $1,999,987. The decrease in revenue of $1,025,331, or approximately 51%, was due primarily to the expiration of the contract with Broadcast’s largest customer and the general reduction of services provided for that customer after the expiration of the contract on May 31, 2013. The revenue generated for this customer aggregated $800,893 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $1,692,029 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease of $891,135 in revenues from this customer was due to the expiration of Broadcast’s service contract with the customer. In addition, web hosting and streaming revenues from one other customer of $132,000 in 2012 were not repeated in 2013.
Broadcast’s largest customer accounted for approximately 82% of its revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 85% of its revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Broadcast will no longer being servicing this customer in the future, which makes restructuring and reducing of its costs imperative until it merges with AllDigital or secures new customers to replace the lost revenues.
Cost of Sales
Costs of sales decreased by $549,633 to $796,333 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from $1,345,966 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of $218,706 in costs related to a reduction in services for Broadcast’s largest customer, a reduction of $132,712 in costs of Broadcast’s production department, of which $100,420 was due to a reduction of staff, and a reduction of $198,215 in depreciation expense due to the fact that Broadcast’s equipment providing services to its largest customer was fully depreciated for the entire quarter.
Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were $642,116 compared to $1,259,320 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The net decrease of $617,204 resulted primarily from a reduction in employee and related costs of $233,500 reflecting a reduction in staff, a decrease in temporary help expenses of $176,077, a decrease of $105,899 in tradeshow and convention expenses, a decrease of $13,346 in legal expenses and smaller decreases in a number of expenses all reflecting the reduction of business activity in the quarter. Research and development in process decreased by $295,907 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $168,940 from $464,847 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, which resulted primarily from a decrease of $147,628 in employee and related expenses and a decrease of $82,688 in expenses for tradeshows and related travel. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $551,302, which decrease was composed mainly of decreases of $289,847 in employee related expenses, $153,582 in tradeshow and related travel expenses and $66,504 in consulting expenses. All of these reductions reflect the discontinuation of active marketing expenses pending the consummation of the proposed merger with AllDigital.
Even with the reduced revenue, due to a reduction of operating expenses, Broadcast’s operating loss decreased $1,098,743 from an operating loss of $1,833,028 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to an operating loss of $734,286 for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Broadcast realized net sales of $7,523,624 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to net sales of $8,446,082 for the year ended December 31, 2011 which represents a decrease of approximately 11% for the year. The net decrease in revenues of $922,458 was primarily the result of a decrease of $1,588,227 in system sales and installation revenue, of which $1,514,456 was a decrease in system sales and installation revenue for Broadcast’s largest digital signage network customer, which was partially offset by an increase in license fee revenue of $396,847, principally from Broadcast’s largest customer, and an increase in streaming revenue of $142,388 made up of many smaller customers.
The cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 aggregated $4,819,624 as compared to the cost of sales of $5,868,601 for the year ended December 31, 2011, which represents a decrease in cost of sales of 18%. The decrease in cost of sales of $1,048,977 was primarily a result of decreased activity in sales and installation of new digital signage locations for Broadcast’s largest customer. Costs of sales related to installation activity decreased by $599,285 and costs of employee expenses related to the decreased activity decreased by $111,110. In addition, depreciation expense decreased by $332,071, which resulted from the digital signage equipment used for Broadcast’s largest customer being fully depreciated.
Broadcast incurred total operating expenses of $8,767,686 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to total operating expenses of $10,572,042 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease of $1,804,356 was primarily due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $1,626,182, a decrease of $656,086 in development expenses and a decrease of $127,043 in depreciation expense. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $631,134 sales and marketing expenses.
General and administrative expenses decreased $1,626,182 from $6,172,794 for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $4,546,612 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease of $1,857,908 in option and warrant expense accounted for the largest single decrease in expenses due to fewer options being granted consultants, employees and directors. In addition, directors’ fees decreased by $59,500. These decreases were partially offset by increased expenses for legal services of $144,311, temporary help of $129,661, and consulting fees of $69,683.
Research and development expenses decreased by $656,086 primarily due to a decrease in outside consulting expenses of $340,469, a decrease of $171,626 in travel and tradeshow expenses, a decrease of $117,196 for temporary help, and a decrease of $120,939 in for expenses related to the issuance of options and warrants. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $91,363 in licenses, permits and fees and an increase of $90,965 for expenses incurred for addition consulting services.
Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $1,908,763 compared to sales and marketing expenses of $1,277,629 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase of $631,134 is due primarily to an increase of $319,126 in employee and related expenses, an increase of $166,962 in advertising, promotion and tradeshow expenses, and an increase of $176,100 in other professional services.
Broadcast recorded an increase in interest expense of $542,352 from interest of $1,000,072 in 2011 to $1,542,424 in 2012. The increase in interest expense resulted primarily from issuance of secured convertible promissory notes during 2012 in a principal amount of approximately $3,050,000, for which Broadcast expensed a total of $650,393, which included accretion of the notes for accounting purposes. Of the total amount of interest expense incurred in 2012, $1,047,030 was for non cash expenses related to accretion on Broadcast’s unsecured convertible note that was extended in December 2010 to December 31, 2013 and for the secured convertible notes issued in 2012 and other related expenses incident to the notes.
Broadcast had net income of $1,602,824 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to net income of $1,304,446 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in net income of $298,378 resulted primarily from recording a gain on extinguishment of debt of Broadcast’s 6.25% Senior Secured Notes of $2,173,033 together with a decrease in loss from operations of $1,930,876 , all of which was partially offset by a decrease of $2,894,652 in the amount of derivative valuation gain recorded related to Broadcast’s convertible notes and investor warrants, an increase in expense of $619,075 related to issuance of warrants issued during the year and the increase of $542,352 in interest expense as discussed above.
Quarterly Financial Data
Summarized unaudited quarterly financial data for 2011, 2012 and 2013 is as follows:
| |
|
2011
|
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,687,264 |
|
|
$ |
2,357,157 |
|
|
$ |
2,277,074 |
|
|
$ |
2,124,587 |
|
|
Gross margin (loss)
|
|
|
411,727 |
|
|
|
736,602 |
|
|
|
758,764 |
|
|
|
670,388 |
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(746,965 |
) |
|
|
442,324 |
|
|
|
4,034,154 |
|
|
|
(2,425,067 |
) |
|
Basic income (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
| |
|
2012
|
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,745,097 |
|
|
$ |
1,999,988 |
|
|
$ |
2,045,278 |
|
|
|
1,733,261 |
|
|
Gross margin (loss)
|
|
|
499,605 |
|
|
|
654,022 |
|
|
|
779,054 |
|
|
|
771,319 |
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(185,477 |
) |
|
|
847,192 |
|
|
|
(711,072 |
) |
|
|
1,652,181 |
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
| |
|
2013
|
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,480,569 |
|
|
$ |
974,657 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Gross margin (loss)
|
|
|
703,000 |
|
|
|
178,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,887,563 |
) |
|
|
(457,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes Broadcast’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:
| |
|
Payments Due
|
|
| |
|
Within
One Year
|
|
|
One Year to
Three Years
|
|
|
Three
Years to
Five
Years
|
|
|
After Five
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
284,447 |
|
|
|
301,600 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
586,047 |
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
4,050,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,050,000 |
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
4,334,447 |
|
|
$ |
301,600 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,636,047 |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2013, Broadcast had a cash balance of $686,347, total current assets of $877,438, total current liabilities of $7,968,941 and total stockholders' deficit of $6,736,801. Included in current liabilities is $1,275,275 relating to the value of the embedded derivatives for Broadcast’s senior secured convertible notes, unsecured convertible note and warrants issued in connection with Broadcast’s 2012 Equity Financing and notes. All of Broadcast’s notes mature within the next six months and must either be refinanced or otherwise retired. Broadcast does not have the liquidity to do so nor does it have the ability to raise additional equity to retire the notes.
Cash used in operations during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $1,052,472 compared to cash used in operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $1,773,339. Although the net cash used in operations decreased, it was primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable of $763,461 and a decrease in accounts payable of $246,738. The negative cash flow was sustained by cash reserves from the issuance of Broadcast’s senior secured convertible notes and the sales of accounts receivable to a related party, which has been treated as debt in Broadcast’s financial statements. Broadcast expects to continue to experience negative operating cash flow until it consummates the proposed merger with AllDigital or until it secures additional customers that replace the revenue no longer realized from Broadcast’s former largest customer.
Broadcast has initiated discussions with various of its accounts payable vendors to settle some of its accounts payable for less than face value in exchange for a payment in cash and/or issuance of common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, Broadcast entered into agreements to discount its payables by approximately $962,630 through the payment of cash and/or issuance of stock and return of equipment to a vendor. Broadcast paid cash of $66,646, issued 2,240,852 shares of its common stock valued at $153,860, from which it recognized a $414,484 gain from the reduction of these obligations. At June 30, 2013, Broadcast’s accounts payable included $76,409 which it owed to vendors as part of these settlements. Additionally, Broadcast returned equipment to a vendor for which it had been invoiced $327,640.
In April 2013, Broadcast entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with one of its directors pursuant to which he agreed to purchase $750,000 of Broadcast’s accounts receivable generated over the next succeeding three months. The $750,000 was discounted by $45,000 and Broadcast received net proceeds from the accounts receivable factoring of $705,000. On August 8, 2013, Broadcast entered into a consent to convert accounts receivable agreement with this director whereby he agreed to accept a convertible promissory note in a principal amount of $750,000 in full satisfaction of Broadcast’s obligations under the accounts receivable purchase agreement. The note bears interest of 12% per annum, is due October 31, 2013 and is convertible into shares of Broadcast common stock at a rate of $0.25 per share at the option of the holder.
The current recession and market conditions have had substantial impacts on the global and national economies and financial markets. These factors, together with soft credit markets, have slowed business growth and generally made potential funding sources more difficult to access. Broadcast continues to be affected by prevailing economic and market conditions, which present considerable risks and challenges.
Because Broadcast has not been successful in deploying its CodecSys technology with customers sufficient to achieve a breakeven and is finding it difficult to raise additional investment capital, Broadcast determined that it should seek an alternative to continuing to commercialize CodecSys by itself. Accordingly, Broadcast sought a merger partner that has compatible video broadcasting products and services, with which it could integrate its CodecSys encoding system. In January 2013, Broadcast entered into the Merger Agreement with AllDigital. On February 8, 2013, AllDigital notified Broadcast that Broadcast was in breach of certain covenants regarding unencumbered ownership or potential claims against its technology, and gave Broadcast 30 days to cure the alleged defects before the merger agreement could be terminated. On March 8, 2013 AllDigital notified Broadcast that sufficient progress had been made that the cure period was extended to April 8, 2013 and later to May 8, 2013 for the remainder of the alleged defects to be cured or waived. On April 10, 2013, the parties entered into an amendment to the Merger Agreement which (i) provides that either party may terminate the Merger Agreement upon 3 days notice, with or without cause, without liability, (ii) eliminates the cure period date requirement and (iii) removes the “No Shop” provision preventing Broadcast from contacting other potential purchasers or merger partners. On June 30, 2013, Broadcast entered into a second amendment to the merger agreement which (i) increases the percentage of our outstanding common stock AllDigital’s shareholders would receive in the merger from 54% to 58%, (i) modifies a number of the closing conditions of the merger, including the working capital and net cash flow require, (iii) adds a new closing condition that Broadcast have post-merger financing commitments in place for the purchase of no less than $1.5 million, nor more than $3.5 million, of Broadcast’s common stock, (iv) extends the “end date” (a date upon which either party may terminate the merger agreement if the merger has not been consummated) from July 31, 2013 to October 31, 2013, (v) eliminates one of Broadcast’s existing directors from the post-closing board of directors such that the post-closing directors are expected to be Donald A. Harris, Paul Summers, David Williams and up to two additional directors mutually approved by Broadcast and AllDigital prior to the closing of the merger and (vi) changes the reverse stock split ratio from a 10 to 1 reverse stock split to a 15 to 1 reverse stock split. On July 9, 2013, Broadcast filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-189869) with the SEC in connection with the anticipated merger. On August 26, 2013, Broadcast and AllDigital entered into a third amendment to the merger agreement which (i) amends the closing condition that Broadcast have post-merger financing commitments in place for the purchase of no less than $1.5 million, nor more than $3.5 million to provide that the minimum commitments will instead be the difference between $1.5 million and the principal amount of the combined convertible notes, (ii) excludes shares issuable upon conversion of the combined convertible notes from the calculation of fully diluted capital stock for both Broadcast and AllDigital for purposes of determining relative ownership upon closing of the merger, (iii) adds a condition that no one but Broadcast shall have any ownership interest in any intellectual property or intellectual property rights at any time owned or supplied by Broadcast, as determined by AllDigital in its reasonable discretion, and (iv) eliminates the ability of either party to terminate the merger agreement without cause on three days advance written notice and with no further liability to the other party.
To fund operations, Broadcast engaged its investment banker to raise funds through the issuance of convertible promissory notes. Broadcast anticipates issuing promissory notes with a principal amount of up to $5,000,000 (“2012 Convertible Debt Offering”) due and payable on or before October 31, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, Broadcast has issued notes with an aggregate principal value of $3,475,000 as explained below. The notes bear interest at 12% per annum and may be convertible to common stock at a $.25 per share conversion price. Broadcast also granted holders of the notes warrants with a five year life to acquire up to 200,000 shares of its common stock for each $100,000 of principal amount of the convertible notes. The notes are secured by all of Broadcast’s assets with the exception of the equipment and receivables secured by the equipment lessor for equipment used in providing services for Broadcast’s largest customer’s digital signage network. On July 13, 2012, Broadcast entered into a note and warrant purchase and security agreement with individual investors and broke escrow on the initial funding under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering, the principal amount of which was $1,900,000, which included the conversion of $900,000 of previously issued short term debt (See Bridge Loan described below) to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering, which extinguished the Bridge Loan. Broadcast realized $923,175 of cash in the initial closing, issued warrants to acquire 3,800,000 shares of its common stock and paid $76,825 in investment banking fees and costs of the offering. Broadcast has continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering and as of January 31, 2013 has issued additional short term debt with a principal amount of $1,225,000, from which it realized cash of $1,176,624 after payment of investment banking fees of $48,376. Broadcast has, however, paid no investment banking fees on sales of its 2012 Convertible Debt Offering since August 2012 and does not anticipate paying additional investment banking fees for the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering. Broadcast has issued warrants to acquire a total of 6,950,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering. On August 6, 2013, Broadcast and the requisite parties executed an amendment of the notes issued pursuant to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering whereby, effective as of July 13, 2013, the maturity date of the notes was extended to October 31, 2013.
On March 16, 2012, Broadcast closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of its outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”) resulting in complete satisfaction its senior indebtedness.
Broadcast entered in to an Engagement Agreement, dated October 28, 2011, with MDB Capital Group, LLC (“MDB”), pursuant to which MDB agreed to act as the exclusive agent of Broadcast on a “best efforts” basis with respect to the sale of up to a maximum gross consideration of $6,000,000, subsequently verbally increased to $10,000,000, of Broadcast’s securities, subject to a minimum gross consideration of $3,000,000. Broadcast agreed to pay to MDB a commission of 10% of the gross offering proceeds received by it, to grant to MDB warrants to acquire up to 10% of the shares of Broadcast’s common stock issued in the financing, and to pay the reasonable costs and expenses of MDB related to the offering.
Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, Broadcast entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) dated March 13, 2012 with select institutional and other accredited investors for the private placement of 27,800,000 units of its securities. The SPA included a purchase price of $0.25 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and two forms of Warrant: (1) The “A” Warrant grants the investors the right to purchase an additional share of common stock for each two shares of common stock purchased, for a term of six years and at an exercise price of $.35 per share; and (2) The “B” Warrant, which has now been extinguished as described below, would not have been exercisable unless and until the occurrence of a future issuance of stock at less than $0.25 per share, but, in the event of such issuance, granted the investors the right to acquire additional shares at a price of $0.05 to reduce the impact of the dilution caused by such issuance, but in no event were the number of shares to be issued under the B Warrant to cause Broadcast to exceed the number of authorized shares of its common stock. The holders of the B Warrants agreed in December 2012 to amend the terms of the B Warrant to reduce the amount of subsequent financing required to extinguish the B Warrants with the result that the B Warrants may now be extinguished by notice to the holders of the B Warrants.
Proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing, after deducting the commissions and the estimated legal, printing and other costs and expenses related to the financing, were approximately $6,950,000. Coincident to the closing of the 2012 Equity Financing, Broadcast also closed on the 2012 Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, Broadcast paid $2.75 million to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), and issued to Castlerigg 2,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $760,000 in full and complete satisfaction of the $5.5 million senior convertible note and all accrued interest then owing. As a result of the foregoing, Castlerigg forgave $2,670,712, which included $680,816 in accrued but unpaid interest. In consideration of negotiating the 2012 Debt Restructuring, Broadcast paid to one of its placement agents compensation equal to 10% of the savings realized through the 2012 Debt Restructuring, which consisted of paying cash of $275,041 and issuing 586,164 shares of Broadcast common stock valued at $222,742. As a result of the foregoing, Broadcast recognized a gain on settlement of debt of $2,173,032.
In December 2011, Broadcast entered into a loan with 7 accredited individuals and entities under the terms of which it borrowed $1,300,000 to be used as working capital (“Bridge Loan”). The Bridge Loan bears an interest rate of 18% per annum and had a maturity date of February 28, 2012, which was subsequently extended to the earlier of the date nine months from the original maturity date or the date Broadcast closes on an additional sale of its securities that results in gross proceeds to Broadcast of $12 million. In consideration of the Bridge Loan, Broadcast granted to lenders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a five year term to purchase 357,500 shares of Broadcast common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share. In consideration of the extension of the maturity date of the Bridge Loan, Broadcast granted the lenders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a six year term to purchase 247,500 shares of Broadcast’s common stock at an exercise price of $.35 per share.
In connection with the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the SPA, two of the above described bridge lenders converted the principal balance of their portion of the bridge loan in the amount of $400,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing. In addition, one other entity converted the amount owed by Broadcast for equipment purchases in the amount of $500,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing. The proceeds from these conversions were treated as funds raised with respect to the financing.
During 2010 Broadcast sold 1,601,666 shares of its common stock to 19 separate investors at a purchase price of $1.00 per share together with a warrant to purchase additional shares of its common stock for $1.50 per share. The warrant expires at the end of three years. The net proceeds from the sale of these shares were used for general working capital purposes. Each of the investors was given the right to adjust their purchase in the event Broadcast sold additional equity at a price and on terms different from the terms on which their equity was purchased. Upon completion of the 2010 Equity Financing described below, each of the investors converted their purchase to the terms contained in the 2010 Equity Financing. This resulted in the issuance of an additional 2,083,374 shares of common stock and the cancellation of 2,495,075 warrants with an exercise price of $1.50 and the issuance of 2,079,222 warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 and an expiration date of five years from the conversion.
On December 24, 2010, Broadcast closed on an equity financing (the “2010 Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of its outstanding convertible indebtedness (the “2010 Debt Restructuring”). The 2010 Equity Financing and the 2010 Debt Restructuring are described below.
Broadcast entered into a Placement Agency Agreement, dated December 17, 2010, with Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation (“PBC”), pursuant to which PBC agreed to act Broadcast’s exclusive agent on a “best efforts” basis with respect to the sale of up to a maximum gross consideration of $15,000,000 of units of Broadcast’s securities, subject to a minimum gross consideration of $10,000,000. The Units consisted of two shares of Broadcast common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of Broadcast common stock. Broadcast agreed to pay PBC a commission of 8% of the gross offering proceeds received by Broadcast, to issue PBC 40,000 shares of Broadcast common stock for each $1,000,000 raised, and to pay the reasonable costs and expenses of PBC related to the offering. Broadcast also agreed to pay PBC a restructuring fee in the amount of approximately $180,000 upon the closing of the 2010 Equity Financing and the simultaneous 2010 Debt Restructuring.
Pursuant to the Placement Agency Agreement, Broadcast entered into Subscription Agreements dated December 23, 2010 with select institutional and other accredited investors for the private placement of 12,500,000 units of its securities. The Subscription Agreements included a purchase price of $1.20 per unit, with each unit consisting of two shares of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock. The warrants have a term of five years and an exercise price of $1.00 per share.
Net proceeds from the 2010 Equity Financing, after deducting the commissions and debt restructuring fees payable to PBC and the estimated legal, printing and other costs and expenses related to the financing, were approximately $13.5 million. Broadcast used a portion of the net proceeds of the Equity Financing to pay down debt and the remainder was used for working capital.
On November 29, 2010, Broadcast entered into a bridge loan transaction with three accredited investors pursuant to which we issued unsecured notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0 million. Upon the closing of the 2010 Equity Financing, the lenders converted the entire principal amount plus accrued interest into the same units offered in the 2010 Equity Financing and the proceeds from the bridge loan transaction were treated as funds raised with respect to the financing.
On December 24, 2010, Broadcast also closed on the 2010 Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, Broadcast (i) issued an Amended and Restated Senior Convertible Note in the principal amount of $5.5 million (the “Amended and Restated Note”) to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), (ii) paid $2.5 million in cash to Castlerigg, (iii) cancelled warrants previously issued to Castlerigg that were exercisable for a total of 5,208,333 shares of common stock, (iv) issued 800,000 shares of common stock to Castlerigg in satisfaction of an obligation under a prior loan amendment, (v) entered into the Letter Agreement pursuant to which Broadcast paid Castlerigg an additional $2.75 million in cash in lieu of the issuance of $3.5 million in stock and warrants as provided in the loan restructuring agreement under which the Amended and Restated Note and other documents were issued (the “Loan Restructuring Agreement”), and (vi) entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with Castlerigg dated December 23, 2010. As a result of the foregoing, Castlerigg forgave approximately $7.2 million of principal and accrued but unpaid interest. The Amended and Restated Note, dated December 23, 2010, was a senior, unsecured note that matured in three years from the closing and bore interest at an annual rate of 6.25%, payable semi-annually. Broadcast paid the first year’s interest of approximately $344,000 at the closing.
In connection with the 2010 Debt Restructuring, Broadcast amended the note with the holder of a $1.0 million unsecured convertible note, pursuant to which the maturity date of the note was extended to December 31, 2013. Broadcast also issued 150,000 shares to the holder of this note and a warrant to acquire up to 75,000 shares of Broadcast common stock as consideration to extend the term of the note. The warrant is exercisable for $0.90 per share and has a five year life.
During 2010, Broadcast entered into two Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreements with one individual for an aggregate amount of $775,000. In these agreements, Broadcast pledged certain outstanding accounts receivable in exchange for an advance payment and a commitment to remit to the purchaser the amount advanced upon collection from Broadcast’s customer. Terms of the first agreement under which Broadcast was advanced $275,000 include a 3% discount with a 3% interest fee for every 30 days the advances remain outstanding. Terms of the second agreement under which Broadcast was advanced $500,000 include a 10% discount with a 0.5% interest fee for every 30 days the advances remain outstanding.
During 2010, Broadcast entered into a $500,000 line of credit for equipment financing to purchase equipment for its largest customer’s digital signage network. The terms of the line of credit include a 3% interest fee for every 30 days the advances on the line of credit remain outstanding. Broadcast received total advances on the line of credit of $500,000 and subsequent to the completion of the Equity Financing repaid the line of credit. Broadcast used the proceeds to purchase and install the equipment at its customer’s locations.
In August 2009, Broadcast entered into a sale and leaseback agreement which financed the purchase and installation of equipment to retrofit its new customer’s approximately 2,100 retail sites with Broadcast’s digital signage product offering. Broadcast received approximately $4,100,000 from the sale of the equipment in exchange for making lease payments over a 36 month period of approximately $144,000 per month.
On December 24, 2007, Broadcast entered into a securities purchase agreement in connection with its senior secured convertible note financing in which it raised $15,000,000 (less $937,000 of prepaid interest). Broadcast used the proceeds from this financing to support its CodecSys commercialization and development and for general working capital purposes. The senior secured convertible note has been retired as described above. During 2010, Broadcast capitalized interest of $1,491,161 related to the senior secured convertible note.
On November 2, 2006, Broadcast closed on a convertible note securities agreement dated October 28, 2006 with an individual that provided Broadcast issue to the convertible note holder (i) an unsecured convertible note in the principal amount of $1,000,000 representing the funding received by Broadcast from an affiliate of the convertible note holder on September 29, 2006, and (ii) four classes of warrants (A warrants, B warrants, C warrants and D warrants) which gave the convertible note holder the right to purchase a total of 5,500,000 shares of Broadcast common stock. The holder of the note no longer has any warrants to purchase any of Broadcast’s stock. The unsecured convertible note was due October 16, 2009 and was extended to December 22, 2010 and the annual interest rate was increased to 8%, payable semi-annually in cash or in shares of Broadcast common stock if certain conditions are satisfied The unsecured convertible note was convertible into shares of Broadcast common stock originally at a conversion price of $1.50 per share, convertible any time during the term of the note, and is subject to standard anti-dilution rights, pursuant to which the note is now convertible at a conversion price of $.25 per share. The term of the convertible note has been extended and now is due December 31, 2013. In connection with the extension of the note, Broadcast issued to the holder of the note 150,000 shares of common stock and a five year warrant to acquire up to 75,000 shares of Broadcast common stock at an exercise price of $.90 per share to extend the term of the note. In addition, Broadcast committed to pay accrued interest due on the convertible note through the issuance of common stock and warrants on the same terms as the Equity Financing.
The conversion feature and the prepayment provision of Broadcast’s $5.5 million Amended and Restated Note and its $1.0 million unsecured convertible note have been accounted for as embedded derivatives and valued on the respective transaction dates using a Black-Scholes pricing model. The warrants related to the $1.0 million unsecured convertible notes have been accounted for as derivatives and were valued on the respective transaction dates using a Black-Scholes pricing model as well. At the end of each quarterly reporting date, the values of the embedded derivatives and the warrants are evaluated and adjusted to current market value. The conversion features of the convertible notes and the warrants may be exercised at any time and, therefore, have been reported as current liabilities. Prepayment provisions contained in the convertible notes limit Broadcast’s ability to prepay the notes in certain circumstances. For all periods since the issuance of the senior secured convertible note and the unsecured convertible note, the derivative values of the respective prepayment provisions have been nominal and have not had any offsetting effect on the valuation of the conversion features of the notes. For a description of the accounting treatment of the senior secured convertible note financing, see Note 6 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.
On March 21, 2011, Broadcast converted $784,292 of its short-term debt into equity through the issuance of common stock and warrants to two lenders at the same unit pricing as the 2010 Equity Financing. In consideration of converting the short- term loans on the basis of $1.20 for two shares of common stock plus one warrant at an exercise price of $1.00, Broadcast issued 1,307,153 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire up to 653,576 shares of common stock, which warrants have a five year term and are exercisable at $1.00 per share. Broadcast’s objective for converting the short-term debt into equity was to conserve cash.
Broadcast’s monthly operating expenses, since its expense reductions including that for CodecSys technology research and development expenses, no longer exceed its monthly net sales. The contract with Broadcast’s former largest customer expired in May of 2013 and Broadcast expects that its revenues will be significantly reduced to the point where if it does not locate new customers, its ability to continue without additional adjustments and expense reductions will be negatively impacted. The foregoing estimates, expectations and forward-looking statements are subject to change as Broadcast makes strategic operating decisions from time to time and as its expenses and sales fluctuate from period to period.
The amount of Broadcast’s operating deficit could decrease or increase significantly depending on strategic and other operating decisions, thereby affecting Broadcast’s need for additional capital. Broadcast expects that its operating expenses will continue to outpace its net sales until it is able to generate additional revenue. Broadcast’s business model contemplates that sources of additional revenue include (i) sales from private communication network services, (ii) sales resulting from new customer contracts, (iii) sales, licensing fees and/or royalties related to commercial applications of CodecSys technology, and (iv) operational efficiencies to be realized through the merger with AllDigital.
Broadcast’s long-term liquidity is dependent upon execution of Broadcast’s business model and the realization of additional revenue and working capital as described above, and upon capital needed for continued commercialization and development of the CodecSys technology. Commercialization and future applications of the CodecSys technology are expected to require additional capital estimated to be approximately $2.0 million annually for the foreseeable future. This estimate will increase or decrease depending on specific opportunities and available funding.
To date, Broadcast has met its working capital needs primarily through funds received from sales of common stock and from convertible debt financings. Until its operations become profitable, Broadcast will continue to rely on proceeds received from external funding. Broadcast expects additional investment capital may come from (i) the exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase capital stock currently held by existing warrant holders; (ii) additional private placements of common stock with existing and new investors; and (iii) the private placement of other securities with institutional investors similar to those institutions that have provided funding in the past.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Broadcast has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact Broadcast’s financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Broadcast does not issue financial instruments for trading purposes. As discussed above, however, the embedded conversion feature and prepayment option of Broadcast’s convertible notes and related warrants are deemed to be derivatives and are subject to quarterly “mark-to-market” valuations.
Broadcast’s cash and cash equivalents are also exposed to market risk. However, because of the short-term maturities of its cash and cash equivalents, Broadcast does not believe that an increase in market rates would have any significant impact on the realized value of its cash and cash equivalent investments. Broadcast currently does not hedge interest rate exposure and is not exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
BUSINESS – ALLDIGITAL
Throughout this Section, AllDigital Holdings, Inc. and AllDigital, Inc., as a consolidated entity, are referred to as “AllDigital”. To the extent there is a need to distinguish AllDigital Holdings, Inc. from AllDigital, Inc., AllDigital Holdings, Inc. is referred to as “AllDigital Holdings” and AllDigital, Inc. is referred to as “AllDigital, Inc.” AllDigital has registered or are is the process of registering the following trademarks: AllDigital® and Cablebox™. Any other trademarks and service marks used in this section are the property of their respective holders.
AllDigital’s Digital Broadcasting Solutions Business
Certain Technical Terms
In this Section, certain technical terms are used to describe AllDigital’s business, which terms are important to an understanding of AllDigital’s business, including the following:
| |
●
|
“Apps” are software applications that operate on a Device, and which can act as the front-end of a remotely hosted, cloud-based Digital Service.
|
| |
●
|
“Devices” are Internet-connected devices, including without limitation smartphones, tablet computers, desktop and laptop computers, gaming consoles, digital televisions, home theatre systems, streaming players, “smart” appliances, and digital signage.
|
| |
●
|
“Digital Broadcasting Workflow” is a series of interconnected processes to ingest, store, prepare, secure, manage, monetize, convert and distribute live media feeds and video-on-demand assets, as well as real-time data and other information to and from Apps on Devices.
|
| |
●
|
“Digital Services” are remotely hosted, cloud-based software applications intended for use on, interactivity with, and the delivery of digital media to or from, one or more Devices, through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow. Examples of well-known Digital Services include NetFlix’s Movies On-Demand, Hulu, Pandora Radio, Instagram, Twitter, MLB.com, Match.com, Pinterest and Facebook.
|
| |
●
|
“Pairing” is the process of setting-up, managing and maintaining the ongoing data exchange between a Digital Service and a Device through the applicable Digital Broadcasting Workflow. Pairing includes not only the initial process of ensuring the compatibility of the Digital Service with one or more Devices operating on one or more Device platforms, but may also include any or all of the following:
|
| |
●
|
Managing various elements of and processes related to the ongoing data exchange between a Digital Service and a Device, including Device compatibility, security, quality of service, data and signal flows, and dynamic updates;
|
| |
●
|
Applying business rules (e.g., subscriber eligibility and authentication) and processing to live media feeds, video-on-demand (e.g., converting master video files into formats compatible with the target Devices), real-time data and other data assets, and Digital Services; and
|
| |
●
|
Acting as the origin for data exchange between the Digital Services, through the Digital Broadcasting Workflow, to the Devices.
|
General Overview
AllDigital provides digital broadcasting solutions. AllDigital’s digital broadcasting solutions consist of the technology and related services required to develop, operate and support a variety of App and Digital Service implementations, through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow, across a large and diverse market of Devices. AllDigital’s business model targets a variety of organizations and existing providers of Digital Services, such as media and entertainment companies, enterprises, government agencies, and nonprofits.
There are a number of technical, financial, personnel, and management challenges for media and entertainment companies, enterprises, and organizations wanting to successfully develop, operate and support a Digital Service through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow to target Devices. As demand continues to increase from both end-users and their Devices requesting growing amounts of cloud-based digital media, data processing, services, and quality of service levels, these challenges will similarly increase.
AllDigital’s cloud platform addresses a significant number of these challenges. AllDigital Cloud is a unified digital broadcasting and cloud services platform. It is dedicated to ingesting, storing, preparing, securing, managing, monetizing, converting and distributing digital media across Devices. AllDigital Cloud enables and supports a variety of complex Digital Broadcasting Workflow and Digital Service implementations. It also maximizes the performance of, and offers significant scale and pricing advantages related to, the cloud-based storage, cloud processing and origin transit of digital media to and from Devices.
Market Opportunity
Industry analysts have predicted that, over the next few years, potentially several hundred thousand different Apps will be developed that enable new and innovative functionality to a growing universe of Devices. The creators and providers of these Apps, many of which will act as the front-end of a Digital Service, will come from a number of different market segments. These market segments, representing AllDigital’s existing and target customers, include:
| |
●
|
Media and entertainment companies;
|
| |
●
|
Enterprises (i.e., small, medium and Fortune 500 corporations);
|
| |
●
|
Educational institutions;
|
| |
●
|
Interactive gaming companies;
|
| |
●
|
Government / non-profit organizations;
|
| |
●
|
Faith-based organizations; and
|
| |
●
|
Hardware manufacturers.
|
High-definition video, broadband wireless access, the proliferation of Devices, consumer convenience and other factors are driving demand and creating new markets for Digital Services. Examples of Digital Services include:
| |
●
|
Watching live television (e.g. Hulu, MLB.com) on a tablet or desktop computer;
|
| |
●
|
Social networking through your smartphone;
|
| |
●
|
Selecting and watching an on-demand movie on your connected television;
|
| |
●
|
Ordering a pizza or lunch using your smartphone during an office meeting;
|
| |
●
|
Participating in corporate training from a home office desktop computer;
|
| |
●
|
Receiving an electronic coupon from an interactive digital signage display and system while shopping at a retail store where you are a registered customer; and
|
| |
●
|
Connecting a group of 50 individuals, each at a separate physical location with their own gaming console, to execute a military campaign online.
|
AllDigital believes Digital Services are: rapidly proliferating; implemented to achieve a wide variety of objectives; driving new business models and strategies; increasingly critical to enterprise core business applications; and changing the way organizations store, originate, and distribute digital media and software applications.
Developing, operating and supporting a successful Digital Service through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow, however, presents a series of challenges for any organization. The financial, personnel, management and technical challenges generally involve investing in, project managing and integrating a combination of complex, proprietary, incompatible, and costly software and equipment, across multiple vendor solutions. Successfully developing, operating and supporting a Digital Service across a set of target Devices will generally require: hiring a team of specialized software engineers and other personnel; procuring the broadcasting, data management, and networking software and equipment required; and a combination or all of the following technical challenges:
| |
●
|
Managing various elements of and processes related to the ongoing data exchange between a Digital Service and a Device, including Device compatibility, security requirements, high levels of quality of service, data and signal flows, and dynamic updates;
|
| |
●
|
Applying real-time business rules (e.g., subscriber eligibility and authentication) and processing to live media feeds, video-on-demand (e.g., converting master video files into formats compatible with the target Devices), real-time data and other data assets, and Digital Services;
|
| |
●
|
Acting as the origin for data exchange between the Digital Service and target Devices in a rapid and cost-effective manner across multiple transport partners;
|
| |
●
|
Procuring and managing a series of integrated, cost-effective and scalable cloud-based services, through a cloud services platform that enables and supports the storage, processing (e.g., encoding, transcoding), and transit of Digital Services to a diverse market of Devices;
|
| |
●
|
Developing and managing a cloud-based services platform that supports a range of Digital Media delivery formats and protocols, including: H.264/AAC, HTTP Dynamic Streaming (HDS), HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), Real-Time Messaging Protocol (RTMP) and Progressive;
|
| |
●
|
Developing and managing a digital broadcasting platform that provides data processing, content and channel management, business logic, and publishing capabilities between broadcasting endpoints (i.e., Devices), as well as the cloud services and back-end business systems (e.g., account and user management) supporting the Digital Service, which platform should include the following services: channel ingest, mapping and metadata; user, account, and eligibility entitlements; digital media and data management and transformation; Pairing and publishing digital media to eligible and authenticated subscribers/users; and application processing interface (“API”) management;
|
| |
●
|
Rapidly resolving any of a series of service incidents that could “break” one or more of the App(s) and/or materially adversely affect the functioning of the Digital Service, such as: operating system updates, software bugs and patches, problems with upstream vendor systems and/or source feeds, or other incidents anywhere within the Digital Broadcasting Workflow; and
|
| |
●
|
Managing complex user and Device entitlements (e.g., conditional access, tokenization, policy management modules, types of encryption, digital rights management) to restrict access to content to authenticated subscribers/users of a Digital Service, across targeted Device types and operating system platforms, in accordance with customer or media and entertainment studio requirements.
|
Designing and developing the App that supports the Digital Service on the target Device types and platforms is another significant challenge. Device manufacturers currently operate in a highly competitive marketplace where Devices based on many different operating systems (e.g., Apple OS / iOS, Windows / RT, Google Android, Blackberry and others) compete for market share. Many of the operating systems powering these Devices have different or incompatible features such as user interface standards, security protocols, audio / video decoders, embedded services and screen resolutions. In addition, the complexity of operating system differences is compounded as they occur over four fundamentally different Device platforms (i.e., mobile, desktop, gaming and digital television), causing the barriers to successfully develop, operate and support a cross-platform Digital Service to increase significantly.
As a result of these challenges and others, the overall investment required to develop, operate and support a Digital Service, through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow, to a series of target Devices can be prohibitive and/or intimidating for many of AllDigital’s customers. Many lack the technical expertise, time and/or resources to cost-effectively distribute their Digital Services beyond a traditional desktop computer Web-page experience. Digital Service and App pioneers (such as Facebook, Netflix, Pandora and MLB.com) have made, and must continue to make, significant, ongoing investments in order to maintain the Pairing of their services to hundreds of different types of Devices. Smaller and emerging companies typically lack the scale and expertise to compete.
AllDigital was founded to enable its customers to outsource the complex processes of developing, operating and supporting Digital Services on a large and diverse market of Devices, through Digital Broadcasting Workflows, to a trusted, third party service provider.
Industry Overview
The Internet plays a crucial role in the way organizations and individuals conduct business and communicate internally and externally. The development of various Internet-based technologies has enabled fundamental and structural changes in the way digital media, Digital Services and/or Apps are published, combined, operated, implemented, broadcast and retrieved. Over the past few years, this includes the ability to develop, deliver and remotely manage a wide variety of Digital Services, through various Digital Broadcasting Workflows, from and to various Device broadcasting endpoints.
AllDigital expects that the need for digital broadcasting solutions will continue to accelerate significantly over the next 2-3 years, which it anticipates will be driven by the convergence of the following key market dynamics:
The market for Devices is substantial and rapidly growing
| |
●
|
According to CNET, there will be approximately 24.45 billion Devices connected to the Internet in use by 2020.
|
| |
●
|
According to Chetan Sharma Consulting, there are currently more than 10 billion connected Devices in the world today.
|
| |
●
|
According to IMS Research, the global shipment of televisions that connect to the Internet is expected to increase from 25% in 2011 to 70% in 2016.
|
| |
●
|
According to Apple, Inc.: more than 400 million iOS devices (iPhones, iPod Touches, and iPads) have been sold through June 2012; over 700,000 apps were in the Apple Store as of September 2012, with the average customer using more than 100 apps; the company shipped 47.8 million iPhones in 4Q12, the biggest volume ever in one quarter and a year-to-year increase of 29%.
|
| |
●
|
According to Google in September 2012, 500 million Android devices had been sold worldwide, with 1.3 million Android activations made per day.
|
Digital Services are increasingly critical to enterprise core business applications, are implemented to achieve a wide variety of objectives, and are rapidly proliferating.
| |
●
|
According to comScore, almost 180 million Americans (83.5% of the US Internet audience) watched 36.2 billion videos online in January 2013, and 9.1 billion video ads.
|
| |
●
|
According to Cisco’s VNI dated February 6, 2013, video streaming and communications applications such as YouTube, Hulu and Netflix use 45% of data consumption on smartphones and 50% of data consumption on tablets.
|
| |
●
|
According to Netflix, as of the period ending December 31, 2012, Netflix’ Internet-based video streaming service has grown to over 33 million global subscribers. Internet-based video services are now available on seven different device types (smartphones, tablets, HDTVs, home theatre systems, etc.), more than 50 different Device platform manufacturers and hundreds of Devices in the U.S.
|
| |
●
|
According to Facebook, in September 2012 the site has 604 million mobile users per month, with 470 million users per month accessing the site via the smartphone app.
|
| |
●
|
According to Vertic, by 2015 mobile app development projects will outnumber native PC projects by a ratio of 4:1.
|
AllDigital expects that Digital Services will continue to proliferate as media and entertainment companies, individual media brands, commercial enterprises, government agencies, nonprofits, and entrepreneurs continue to create new applications for, and subsequently develop and launch a wide variety of Digital Services.
Over the past few years, certain of AllDigital’s target customers have attempted to address Digital Service and Digital Broadcasting Workflow initiatives through: custom software development projects with companies like AllDigital; establishing new internal departments (i.e., cost centers); reorganizing or temporarily assigning internal personnel on a project basis; or a hybrid approach of the foregoing. These approaches generally do not harness the cost efficiencies, economies of scale, development and integration time, and performance benefits, related to working with a vendor dedicated to providing digital broadcasting solutions for numerous clients. As the total investment required, technical complexity and other challenges of successfully developing, operating and maintaining a Digital Service continue to grow, AllDigital believes these considerations must be increasingly addressed. AllDigital also believes the growth of the Digital Services market will not be sustainable without the creation of trusted third party providers of digital broadcasting solutions.
Target Market Segments
AllDigital has targeted several industry segments that AllDigital believes to be responsive to a comprehensive offering of digital broadcasting solutions. AllDigital’s business strategy is to provide the technology and services that enable its target customers to cost-effectively and securely distribute, with a high quality of service, a wide range of Digital Services to a wide variety of Devices without requiring significant in-house technical resources.
Adoption of Digital Service business models has seen significant growth in recent years among AllDigital’s target customers, in part because media and entertainment companies, individual media brands, social networking sites and communication companies are typically the earliest adopters of such new technologies. AllDigital is not only targeting new market opportunities, but also is attempting to capture the outsourcing of Digital Service and Digital Broadcasting Workflow implementations by early adopters. AllDigital believes that its technology and services offerings can provide significant performance improvements, cost efficiencies, time to market, new features and capabilities, and the ability to Pair Digital Services with greater numbers and types of Devices than earlier digital media distribution models.
Examples of AllDigital’s targeted industry segments include:
Media Content and Services. There are a number of companies of various sizes and specializations, with media content, online services and/or other business and software application needs that can be distributed to Devices via Digital Services. Examples include:
Media and Entertainment: This sub-segment includes movie studios, filmmakers, news broadcasters, talk-show hosts, sports broadcasters and communications services providers. Targeted media brands in this sub-segment generally require a broad range of platform capabilities and services for originating, transporting and selling or otherwise monetizing their media content on Devices via Digital Service offerings. They generally also require assistance with generating revenues from media distribution, increasing audience size, gathering market data, payment processing, providing dynamic updates, and managing entitlements, including conditional access.
Social Networking: Some of the most widely used Digital Service applications are through popular established brands such as Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Match.com and Twitter. Each of these established brands is continuously evolving their Digital Services applications to include: the integration and “on-boarding” of partner Digital Services; the expansion of their Digital Service business models for both recurring and event-based purposes, and; expanding their reach and footprint to additional Devices and Device platforms. New social networking sites are also emerging, developing and launching Digital Services dedicated to the creation of on-demand content, originated from Devices, delivered to and stored in a centralized repository, and available for viewing, sharing, fundraising, and other purposes. There are also many smaller and more vertical social networking websites that could be converted to either a mobile and/or digital television experience via a Digital Service. Each of the examples above could be supported by the digital broadcasting solutions offered by AllDigital.
Music and Radio: Radio stations, musicians and Digital Service Providers benefit from increasing the distribution of their content. Through Internet-based broadcasting of their programming content, they can increase the size of their potential listening audience to a variety of Devices and into areas not reachable by their conventional broadcast signal, effectively allowing their content to be available to a much larger and more diverse audience. There are a growing number of online radio stations and services utilizing Digital Services to reach various Devices, such as Pandora Radio, FreeStreams, and similar websites.
Education: Community colleges, universities and other educational organizations can expand upon current course offerings with live or recorded audio and video webcasting. Many of these institutions are already equipped with wireless broadband access and have an Internet savvy student population. Internet-based digital broadcasting allows educational institutions to give students and teachers access to classes whenever and wherever they want. Dedicated online services that enable teaching to those who are remotely located or physically disabled (such as an Amazon “Kindle” for education) could benefit greatly from AllDigital’s products and services. For example, using AllDigital’s publishing features and capabilities, educators could use its platform to bring needed revenue to their learning institutions.
Interactive Gaming : Interactive gaming has become increasingly popular, with many new computer games offering online functionality that enables players to interact with other players, play against other players over the Internet, or stream or download new scenes or worlds for their games, each a Digital Service. This includes the availability of games on a growing number of Device platforms. Examples include some of the most popular games currently on the market, such as League of Legends and Halo 4. League of Legends is available on various PC desktop and laptop Devices, and was recently released in beta format for Apple OS X desktop and laptop Devices. Halo 4 is available via Microsoft’s Xbox gaming console. Another interactive game, Call of Duty: Black Ops, is available via Microsoft’s Xbox and Sony’s PS3 gaming consoles, as well as various PC desktop Devices and tablets such as Apple’s iPad.
Enterprise/Government/Nonprofit. While consumer adoption of Digital Service applications and business models has already seen significant growth, many corporations, government agencies and nonprofits appear to be at the early stages of a similar paradigm shift. For example, companies are seeking new and creative ways to cut travel costs by offering live, high-quality, reliable, and secure corporate training on Devices. Corporate communications such as presentations, public relations campaigns, quarterly earnings reports or company news, are also increasingly frequently being delivered broadly to and managed through multiple Devices. Secure voting and polling among international employees is another example of a Digital Service application. As companies develop and launch unique and successful Digital Services, AllDigital expects that this target market will provide significant growth opportunities. Government agencies for example may want to develop and implement Digital Service applications for streaming military training and time sensitive news videos to military bases and troop deployments globally, which also result in significant cost savings.
Faith-Based Organizations. Digital broadcasting to Devices or Digital Service applications have also seen penetration and growth within a variety of faith-based organizations such as churches and ministries, as well as affiliate organizations and service providers dedicated to supporting their missions. Live broadcasts and on-demand re-broadcasts of various forms of video and audio content, including online libraries of worship services, specialized teachings, instructional courses, daily devotions and other key messages, can be facilitated through an array of Digital Service models and implementations.
Hardware Manufacturers. Hardware manufacturers produce a broad spectrum of products that target both business and consumer markets. Examples of products by category include: digital signage at financial institutions, retail stores, and restaurants; medical devices; robotics and artificial intelligence; business and home security Devices; “smart” appliances; business / home automation and resource conservation; toys; and consumer electronics. As smartphones and tablet products such as the iPhone and iPad continue to demonstrate new and unique capabilities through a wide array of innovative Apps being developed and made available for download from Apple’s App Store, AllDigital believes that a similar evolution and economic ecosystem will occur with Devices outside of traditional consumer electronics.
Products and Services
AllDigital provides digital broadcasting solutions. Its digital broadcasting solutions consist of the technology and services required to develop, operate and support a variety of Digital Service implementations, through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow, across a large and diverse market of Devices. AllDigital’s business model targets a variety of organizations and existing providers of Digital Services, such as media and entertainment companies, enterprises, government agencies, and nonprofits.
The core of its solutions is AllDigital Cloud. AllDigital Cloud is a unified digital broadcasting and cloud services platform dedicated to ingesting, storing, preparing, securing, managing, monetizing, converting and distributing digital media across Devices. It enables and supports a variety of complex Digital Broadcasting Workflow and Digital Service implementations. AllDigital Cloud also maximizes the performance of, and offers significant scale and pricing advantages related to, the cloud-based storage, cloud processing and origin transit of digital media to and from Devices.
AllDigital’s customers have the option to contract the following digital broadcasting solutions, or purchase a combination of technology and service elements: (i) AllDigital Broadcast (i.e., AllDigital Cloud, App Frameworks, Integration Services, collectively branded “AllDigital Broadcast”); (ii) AllDigital Cloud (i.e., AllDigital Cloud Platform, AllDigital Cloud Storage, AllDigital Cloud Processing, AllDigital Origin Transit); (iii) Integration Services (i.e., including App Frameworks); and (iv) Technical Support and App Maintenance.
AllDigital typically charges monthly recurring platform (AllDigital Broadcast or AllDigital Cloud) fees, as well as monthly recurring fees for its storage, processing, and origin transit cloud-based services. AllDigital also typically charges monthly recurring fees for the technical support and maintenance of Apps that it develops (i.e., Technical Support and App Maintenance), and that act as the front-end of a Digital Service. Non-recurring revenues typically come from platform customization and integration services, sometimes referred to as “platform on-boarding”, as well as professional services related to custom App development for targeted Devices and Device platforms (i.e., Integration Services), leveraging its App Frameworks. The term of AllDigital’s customer contracts currently range from a two-month (paid) trial to two years.
Since AllDigital’s inception, because of the complex and evolving nature of Apps, Digital Services, Digital Broadcasting Workflows, and Devices, AllDigital’s customer requirements have varied widely. Many of its customers have specific functional requirements or a specific concept to develop and manage a Digital Service to one or more target Device types and platforms. Other customers, including large enterprises, begin with only a general concept to distribute their digital media assets through a software application as a service to achieve certain objective(s). These customers typically require some level of professional services support to initially define and discover functional requirements prior to the development and launch of their Digital Services.
AllDigital Cloud
AllDigital Cloud is a unified digital broadcasting and cloud services platform. It is dedicated to ingesting, storing, preparing, securing, managing, monetizing, converting and distributing digital media across Devices. AllDigital Cloud enables and supports a variety of complex Digital Broadcasting Workflow and Digital Service implementations. It also maximizes the performance of, and offers significant scale and pricing advantages related to, the cloud-based storage, cloud processing and origin transit of digital media to and from Devices.
AllDigital Cloud Platform
The AllDigital Cloud platform contains a multi-layered integrated service model. Modular service layers directly support the following: digital asset management; content management; data management; workflow services (e.g., publishing, content subscription, service automation); Application Programming Interface (“API”) management (e.g., customized data ingest/retrieval, authentication); content ingest services; cloud processing services; storage services; and media delivery services. The platform also contains service layer capabilities related to channel and account management, entitlements (e.g., eligibility) and conditional access (e.g., digital rights management). Service layer capabilities require platform customization and integration with customer and/or customer third party vendor feeds and systems. A role-based management portal serves as a control panel for customers and AllDigital to: manage their accounts; view reporting, logging, analytics, and billing statistics; and view other capabilities and information.
A series of other AllDigital Cloud platform features and capabilities also enable: (i) “plug and play” with multiple 3rd party systems and service providers; (ii) virtualized or hardware-based deployments with minimal customization, resulting in the ability to support the steady or rapid growth and scale of a Digital Service without significant manual or other system re-configuration requirements; (iii) operating efficiencies and robust service-level / system performance; and (iv) customer-driven configurations to match the needs and requirements of their specific offering.
AllDigital intends to continue to develop and mature its AllDigital Cloud platform and roadmap to add additional features and capabilities in response to customer requirements, industry trends, and overall market demand.
AllDigital Cloud Storage
AllDigital provides centralized, fault-tolerant, replicated, asset storage. Its storage platform and capabilities are based on the “cloud storage” methodology where data is stored on multiple servers located in one or more data centers typically shared by more than one customer.
The asset storage capability in AllDigital’s AllDigital Cloud Storage service layer is specifically tailored to deliver robust performance and availability for large media libraries, among other attributes. For example, the storage repository can independently scale beyond traditional storage systems in both capacity and performance. The platform also contains a parallel computing approach that overcomes common input/output bottlenecks present in other cloud storage offerings. AllDigital also offers customers standards-based access using dedicated or managed computing resources, providing AllDigital’s customers the unique ability to integrate custom features and applications into their Digital Broadcasting Workflows. AllDigital’s storage platform may be accessed through an API or a Web-based user interface.
AllDigital Cloud Processing
Cloud processing (e.g., encoding and transcoding) is a form of Internet-based computing, whereby shared resources, software and data are provided to computers, servers and other Devices on demand. In order to provide services such as the encoding and transcoding of digital media (e.g., convert a master file into a format compatible for a specific Device), AllDigital provides cloud-computing assets on the same network as its cloud-storage platform. The advantage of this model is to provide AllDigital’s customers with a low latency and cost-effective platform to execute business rules, as well as to operate and support their Digital Service.
AllDigital Cloud includes a range of content processing tools to prepare and convert digital media for multiplatform delivery. The system’s transcoding technology applies industry-standard audio and video codecs to ensure that assets will be delivered in the required output formats for all target Device platforms.
AllDigital Origin Transit
Origin transit is the service of allowing network traffic to cross or “transit” a computer network. AllDigital’s transit model focuses on optimizing the two-way delivery of data to and from a Device. Customers, or Devices, can send a single transit of data (e.g., a large file) to AllDigital’s storage platform. AllDigital refers to that transit as the “ingress” of data. Once the data is stored or prepared for targeted or widespread delivery over the Internet to one or more content delivery networks (“CDNs”), Internal Service Providers (“ISPs”), or other transport models, AllDigital “egresses” (or sends) the data to these upstream partners.
As end-user demand increases for data intensive Digital Services (e.g., hi-definition video distribution), certain ISPs are demanding extra fees from Digital Service providers for access to their network to offset the cost of providing massive spikes of data to their subscribers. AllDigital’s Origin Transit models allows its customers to send data intensive files once to the ISP as opposed to millions of ISP subscribers potentially downloading the same file directly from the Digital Service provider. The ISP can then distribute the file multiple times to their subscribers at a far lower cost of delivery and distribution since they generally own their own network.
Integration Services
Integration Services refers to the varying levels of professional services required to customize and integrate the AllDigital Cloud platform to support a Digital Service with a customer’s proprietary systems and/or other specific requirements. This is sometimes referred to as “platform on-boarding.” Integration Services also refers to custom App development for targeted Devices. With each App serving as the front-end of a Digital Service, professional services associated with custom App development also involves integrating and Pairing each App with the AllDigital Cloud platform, or applicable platform components.
App Frameworks
AllDigital has developed a series of proven mobile, desktop, and connected television advanced App frameworks. It has developed and continually improved these App frameworks through a variety of customer experiences, and as a byproduct of its learning related to the complex and evolving nature of Apps, Digital Services, Digital Broadcasting Workflows, and Devices. AllDigital’s library of App frameworks enables the highly cost-effective and timely development of high quality, secure, and reliable Apps and Digital Services across a large and fragmented market of Devices types and platforms.
Technical Support and App Maintenance
Technical Support and App Maintenance generally refers to support services, as well as AllDigital Cloud Platform support. AllDigital’s App support services generally include: level three support; quality of service monitoring and alerting; application and system maintenance; and service incident reporting and project management. AllDigital’s App maintenance services include performing ongoing software maintenance releases containing bug fixes and/or enhancements, as well as rapidly modifying and upgrading the Apps to support Device OS updates shortly after the final release of such Device OS. Technical Support also refers to supporting agreed upon platform quality of service levels throughout the term of the customer contract. AllDigital has the experience and capabilities to support a broad range of digital broadcasting solutions at the highest quality of service levels, leveraging from its robust AllDigital Cloud platform, highly scalable cloud services, and digital broadcasting infrastructure.
Sales and Marketing
AllDigital has provided and/or is actively providing services to a variety of media and entertainment, enterprise, and organization (government/non-profit) customers since it began operations in August 2009. All of AllDigital’s customers to date, through its earliest stages of operations, have largely been a result of direct sales, word of mouth or partner referrals.
To attract customers going forward, AllDigital has formulated, but only partially implemented, a marketing strategy that employs multiple channels to get its message out to likely users of its digital broadcasting solutions. These channels include highly scalable online marketing, direct business development among the target market segments, advertising through highly targeted print and electronic media, recruitment of resellers, adoption into OEM software such as content management system offerings and authoring tools, bundling and referral arrangements with industry partners that offer complementary products and services, and participation in trade shows, seminars and other educational forums directed to AllDigital’s target market segments.
AllDigital’s business will primarily depend on aggressive business development efforts. This will require a persistent and sustained effort to maintain relationships and communication lines with the key decision makers at AllDigital’s target customers.
Competition
The Digital Media Stack
The process of transferring data to and from a Device generally involves the origin, conversion, management, transport and delivery of that data through a distribution process. The major components of the data distribution process are collectively referred to as the digital media “stack.” Data may originate from a Digital Service or a Device, and that data must be routed over the Internet. AllDigital’s customers require a place to store, run and manage their Digital Service. They require a method to transport data to and from the target Devices and Device platforms that they support. AllDigital’s customers also frequently require technical support services, including software application maintenance and support, and data management services, to manage the ongoing Pairing of their Digital Service to one or more Devices.
Examples of companies that provide services related to, or operating within, the digital media stack include ISPs, CDNs, content management systems (“CMS”), utility computing providers, systems integrators and vertical solutions providers.
An ISP is a company that offers access to the Internet. The ISP connects to its customers using a data transmission technology appropriate for delivering Internet Protocol data over dial-up, DSL, cable modem, wireless or dedicated high-speed connections. Examples include: AT&T, Quest and Verizon.
A CDN is a system of computers containing copies of data, placed at various points in a network so as to maximize bandwidth for access to the data from clients throughout the network. A client accesses a copy of the data near to the client, as opposed to all clients accessing the same central server, to avoid bottlenecks near that server. Content types include web objects, downloadable objects (media files, software, documents), applications, real time media streams and other components of Internet delivery (DNS, routes, and database queries). Examples include: Akamai, Level 3 Communications and Limelight Networks.
CMS companies typically provide website authoring and administration tools designed to allow users to manage their media assets (such as hi-definition video files) prior to distribution over the Internet or other content delivery mechanisms. Examples include: Brightcove, Kaltura and Ooyala.
Utility computing companies provide cloud-based services such as data storage and processing. Examples include 3Par, Amazon and IBM. These companies typically focus on providing “raw” storage and processing capacity.
A systems integrator is a person or company that specializes in bringing together component subsystems into a whole and ensuring that those subsystems function together efficiently to achieve their intended objectives. Systems integrators work within and across a wide variety of industries, applications, and subsystems, and typically target as their customers Fortune 500 companies, major media brands, as well as hardware and Device manufacturers. Examples of large systems integrators include: IBM, PWC, EDS and Accenture.
Vertical solution providers are typically smaller companies that provide individual or multiple technical solutions targeted towards customer support, field services or mobile environments.
AllDigital’s Competitors
AllDigital’s core business is digital broadcasting solutions, which is an evolving business offering. AllDigital is not aware of any direct competitors offering and/or providing its comprehensive portfolio of digital broadcasting solutions. Various components of AllDigital’s product and service offering, however, are provided by several companies which operate in the digital media “stack.” For example, a CMS platform may provide tools for managing the distribution of video files, which overlaps with a subcomponent of AllDigital Cloud Platform capabilities. CMS providers now also offer certain professional services and digital media to Device solutions that directly compete with certain subcomponents of AllDigital’s offerings and capabilities. A CDN may be AllDigital’s partner, hosting video files or other data in various data centers for a mutual client, but that CDN may also provide professional services that include ensuring the compatibility of a Digital Service with a Device, which overlaps with a subcomponent of AllDigital’s offerings and capabilities. AllDigital also competes with certain vertical solution providers and system integrators that provide individual implementations of a Digital Service to a Device.
Dependence on Certain Customers
AllDigital has served and/or is actively serving a variety of media and entertainment, enterprise, and organization (government/non-profit) customers since it began operations in August of 2009. As of December 31, 2012, AllDigital had 10 direct customers. AllDigital also acted as subcontractors for certain of these customers, servicing and supporting a total of 19 accounts. Through the year ending December 31, 2012, AllDigital’s three largest billing relationships accounted for approximately 85% of its total billings. C2 Hosting accounted for approximately 22%, Rogers Communications accounted for approximately 21%, Cox Media Group accounted for approximately 17%, Ooyalla accounted for approximately 13% and Chideo accounted for approximately 12%.
Intellectual Property
AllDigital depends on its ability to develop and maintain the proprietary aspects of its technology. AllDigital also seeks to protect its copyrights, trade secrets and other proprietary information through a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures and common law copyright and trademark principles.
AllDigital has not sought or obtained registered copyright or patent protection for any of its intellectual property. AllDigital has applied for federal registration of certain trademarks in order to develop a trademark portfolio and protect its brand. Two applications related to the registration of the word mark for ALLDIGITAL were filed on October 16, 2009. As of April 2011, both of AllDigital’s applications were approved as registered marks. AllDigital plans to explore applying for additional trademarks in 2013.
AllDigital believes that elements of its existing AllDigital Cloud platform, certain components of its advanced App frameworks, and certain new technologies under development may have patent potential. As AllDigital raises additional capital, it expects to investigate such potential, and if appropriate, commence a provisional patent application filing process.
Government Regulation
Other than business license requirements, laws and regulations applicable to substantially all business entities in the jurisdictions in which AllDigital operates, AllDigital does not need any material government approvals in connection with its businesses and is not subject to material government regulation.
Research and Development
AllDigital did not spend material amounts on research and development during fiscal years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Environmental Laws
AllDigital does not use hazardous substances in its operations and has not incurred, and does not expect to incur, material costs associated with compliance with environmental laws at the federal, state and local levels.
Employees
AllDigital has twenty-two full time employees, including its five-person executive management team identified below. None of AllDigital’s employees is represented under a collective bargaining agreement.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – ALLDIGITAL
This discussion contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “likely,” “believe,” “intend” or “expect” “will” or similar words. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors noted in the section of this prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 11 and other cautionary statements throughout this prospectus. You should also keep in mind that all forward-looking statements in this section are based on AllDigital management’s existing beliefs about present and future events outside of AllDigital management’s control and on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect.
General Outlook
AllDigital expects that the need for digital broadcasting solutions will accelerate significantly over the next 2-3 years, which acceleration it anticipates will be driven by the convergence of the following two key market dynamics: (1) The market for Devices is substantial and rapidly growing, and, (2) Digital Services are increasingly critical to enterprise core business applications, are implemented to achieve a wide variety of objectives, and are rapidly proliferating. AllDigital believes that the growth of the Digital Services market will not be sustainable, however, without the creation of third party service providers that offer the digital broadcasting solutions required to successfully develop, operate and support Digital Services to a large and diverse market of Devices.
AllDigital’s ability to successfully generate future revenues is dependent on a number of factors, including: (i) the availability of capital to continue to develop, operate and maintain its proprietary AllDigital Cloud platform and services, (ii) the ability to commercialize its portfolio of digital broadcasting solutions to media and entertainment companies, enterprises, government agencies, and non-profits, and (iii) its ability to attract and retain key sales, business and product development, and other personnel as its business and offerings continue to mature. AllDigital may encounter setbacks related to these activities.
Results of Operations – Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The following discussions are based on the consolidated balance sheets as June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 and statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited) and notes thereto.
The tables presented below, which compare AllDigital’s results of operations from one period to another, present the results for each period and the change in those results from one period to another in both dollars and percentage change. The columns present the following:
|
|
·
|
The first two data columns in each table show the dollar results for each period presented.
|
|
|
·
|
The columns entitled “Dollar variance” and “% variance” show the change in results, both in dollars and percentages. These two columns show favorable changes as positive and unfavorable changes as negative. For example, when net sales increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a positive number in both columns. Conversely, when expenses increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a negative in both columns.
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| |
|
For the three months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar variance
favorable
|
|
|
% variance
favorable
|
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,026,187 |
|
|
$ |
646,427 |
|
|
$ |
379,760 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
607,792 |
|
|
|
599,696 |
|
|
|
(8,096 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
418,395 |
|
|
|
46,731 |
|
|
|
371,664 |
|
|
|
795.3 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing and
advertising
|
|
|
99,741 |
|
|
|
201,054 |
|
|
|
101,313 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
440,900 |
|
|
|
359,415 |
|
|
|
(81,485 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
%) |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
540,641 |
|
|
|
560,469 |
|
|
|
19,828 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(122,246 |
) |
|
|
(513,738 |
) |
|
|
391,492 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(69.3 |
%) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Other income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
%) |
|
Total other income
(expense)
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
(85.2 |
%) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before
provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(122,121 |
) |
|
|
(512,895 |
) |
|
|
390,774 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
% |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(122,121 |
) |
|
$ |
(512,895 |
) |
|
$ |
390,774 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
% |
Net Sales. Net sales increased by $379,760, or 59% in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012, primarily due to $279,149 increase in non-recurring projects and a $100,611 increase in recurring monthly maintenance and support contracts with new and existing customers.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by $371,664, or 795%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase in gross profit resulted from an increase of $379,760 in net sales and $16,179 decrease in 3rd party contracted resources as AllDigital transitioned to more in-house personnel and $7,770 in salaries and related expenses for new engineering and software development resources for current and upcoming projects, offset by increases of $24,201 in travel and $7,844 increase in other costs of sales.
Selling, Marketing and Advertising Expenses. Selling, marketing and advertising expenses decreased by $101,313, or 50%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. The decrease resulted from decreases of $78,770 in salary and payroll related expenses, primarily due to two fewer employees in 2013 as compared to 2012, $11,050 in consultants and outside services, $10,592 in advertising, and $901 in other expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and Administrative expenses increased by $81,485, or 23%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase was primarily due to increases of $52,252 in legal expense, $39,989 in salary and payroll related expenses, $8,275 in business insurance expense, $4,989 in public reporting expense, and $10,348 in other expenses, offset by decreases of $12,500 in software expenses, $9,446 in equipment expenses, $7,307 audit expenses, and $5,115 in outside services.
Results of Operations – Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The following discussions are based on the consolidated balance sheets as June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 and statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited) and notes thereto.
The tables presented below, which compare AllDigital’s results of operations from one period to another, present the results for each period and the change in those results from one period to another in both dollars and percentage change. The columns present the following:
|
|
·
|
The first two data columns in each table show the dollar results for each period presented.
|
|
|
·
|
The columns entitled “Dollar variance” and “% variance” show the change in results, both in dollars and percentages. These two columns show favorable changes as positive and unfavorable changes as negative. For example, when net sales increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a positive number in both columns. Conversely, when expenses increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a negative in both columns.
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| |
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
Dollar variance
favorable
|
|
|
% variance
favorable
|
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
(unfavorable) |
|
|
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,038,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,598,276 |
|
|
$ |
440,018 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,217,977 |
|
|
|
1,242,975 |
|
|
|
24,998 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
820,317 |
|
|
|
355,301 |
|
|
|
465,016 |
|
|
|
130.9 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing and
advertising
|
|
|
215,841 |
|
|
|
387,533 |
|
|
|
171,692 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
900,023 |
|
|
|
828,910 |
|
|
|
(71,113 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
%) |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,115,864 |
|
|
|
1,216,443 |
|
|
|
100,579 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(295,547 |
) |
|
|
(861,142 |
) |
|
|
565,595 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(66.7 |
%) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Other income
|
|
|
66,653 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
66,132 |
|
|
|
12,693.3 |
% |
|
Total other income
(expense)
|
|
|
66,937 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
65,649 |
|
|
|
5,097.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before
provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(228,610 |
) |
|
|
(859,854 |
) |
|
|
631,244 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
% |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(229,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(862,254 |
) |
|
$ |
632,844 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
% |
Net Sales. Net sales increased by $440,018, or 28% in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012, due to $311,464 increase in recognition of percentage of completion related to its contracts and completion of projects with new customers, and $128,554 in recurring monthly maintenance and support contracts with new and existing customers.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by $465,016, or 131%, in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012. The increase in gross profit resulted from an increase of $440,018 in net sales and $103,607 decrease in 3rd party contracted resources as AllDigital transitioned to more in-house personnel, offset by $45,338 increase in salaries and related expenses for new engineering and software development resources for current and upcoming projects, $20,255 travel, $5,011 operating leases, $4,837 licenses, and $3,168 increase in other costs of sales.
Selling, Marketing and Advertising Expenses. Selling, marketing and advertising expenses decreased by $171,692, or 44%, in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012. The decrease resulted from decreases of $133,177 in salary and payroll related expenses, primarily due to three fewer employees in 2013 as compared to 2012, $24,060 in advertising expense, $7,603 in travel expense, and $8,497 in other selling expenses, offset by an increase of $1,645 in consultants and outside services expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and Administrative expenses increased by $71,113, or 9%, in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012. The increase was primarily due to increases of $70,029 in salary and payroll related expenses, $50,383 in legal expense, $17,207 in business insurance, $12,132 in travel expense, $6,681 in public reporting expense, $5,855 in depreciation and amortization expense, and $2,399 in other expenses, offset by a decrease of $34,072 in bad debt expense, $26,955 in consultants and outside services, $19,893 in software maintenance and support, and $12,653 in equipment expense.
Other Income. Other income was $66,653 in the first six months of 2013 compared to $521 in the first six months of 2012. $66,847 was the result of a settlement with a former customer.
Results of Operations 2012 and 2011
The following discussions are based on AllDigital’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and statement of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and notes thereto.
The tables presented below, which compare AllDigital’s results of operations from one period to another, present the results for each period and the change in those results from one period to another in both dollars and percentage change. The first two data columns in each table show the dollar results for each period presented.
The columns entitled “Dollar variance” and “% variance” show the change in results, both in dollars and percentages. These two columns show favorable changes as positive and unfavorable changes as negative. For example, when net sales increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a positive number in both columns. Conversely, when expenses increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a negative in both columns.
Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011
| |
|
For the years ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar variance
favorable
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
% variance
favorable
(unfavorable)
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,307,167
|
|
|
$
|
2,852,350
|
|
|
$
|
454,817
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,486,388
|
|
|
|
1,702,670
|
|
|
|
(783,718
|
)
|
|
|
(46.0
|
)%
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
820,779
|
|
|
|
1,149,680
|
|
|
|
(328,901
|
)
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing and advertising
|
|
|
600,789
|
|
|
|
267,637
|
|
|
|
(333,152
|
)
|
|
|
(124.5
|
)%
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,587,445
|
|
|
|
1,164,941
|
|
|
|
(422,504
|
)
|
|
|
(36.3
|
)%
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,188,234
|
|
|
|
1,432,578
|
|
|
|
(755,656
|
)
|
|
|
(52.7
|
)%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,367,455
|
)
|
|
|
(282,898
|
)
|
|
|
(1,084,557
|
)
|
|
|
(383.4
|
)%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(26,070
|
)
|
|
|
25,958
|
|
|
|
99.6
|
%
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
195,521
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
195,521
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Organization costs write-off
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(790,840
|
)
|
|
|
790,840
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
196,646
|
|
|
|
(815,978
|
)
|
|
|
1,012,624
|
|
|
|
124.1
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,170,809
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098,876
|
)
|
|
|
(71,933
|
)
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,173,209
|
)
|
|
|
(1,101,276
|
)
|
|
|
(71,933
|
)
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,173,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,096,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,933
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
Net Sales. Net sales increased by $454,817, or 16% for the year 2012 compared to the year 2011, due to a $341,772 increase in recurring monthly maintenance and support contracts with new and existing customers, and a $113,045 increase in recognition of percentage of completion revenue related to AllDigital’s contracts with existing and new customers.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased by $328,901, or 29%, for the year 2012 compared to the year 2011. The decrease in gross profit resulted from increases of $651,589 in salaries and related expenses for new engineering and software development resources for current and upcoming projects, $57,512 in 3rd party contracted resources as AllDigital transitioned to more in-house personnel, $34,548 in operating leases, $29,644 in equipment expenses, and $20,364 in licenses expenses, offset by a decrease of $9,939 in other cost of sales and an increase of $454,817 in net sales.
Selling, Marketing and Advertising Expenses. Selling, marketing and advertising expenses increased by $333,152, or 125%, for the year 2012 compared to the year 2011. The increase resulted from increases of $218,432 in salary and payroll related expenses, primarily due to the addition of one new employee in August 2011 and one in September 2011, $46,380 in advertising, $31,499 in travel, $24,480 in consultants and outside services, and the remaining $12,361 in other selling expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and Administrative expenses increased by $422,504, or 36%, for the year 2012 compared to the year 2011. The increase was due to increases of $250,318 in salary and payroll related expenses, $81,844 in rent, $47,446 in software maintenance and support, $34,072 in bad debts expense, $27,747 in legal expense, $22,284 in depreciation and amortization expense, $16,078 in phone expenses, $12,800 in dues and subscriptions, $10,458 in accounting expenses, and $26,553 in other expenses, offset by decreases of $85,806 in consulting and outside services and $21,290 in travel expenses.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $25,958, or 100%, for the year of 2012 as compared to the year 2011. The decrease was due to $25,616 in interest expense that accrued on the principal balance of the outstanding notes during 2011 compared to $0 in 2012 as the notes were converted to equity in 2011.
Organization Costs Writeoff. Organization costs writeoff was $790,840 for 2011 compared to $0 for 2012. These costs were incurred in connection with AllDigital’s merger with Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. (“Aftermarket”) in the third quarter of 2011. AllDigital determined that the value of the intangible assets identified and unidentified was $0. As such, AllDigital recorded a charge of $790,840 to its consolidated statement of operations in 2011 relating to the reverse acquisition because the value of the consideration given was in excess of the value of the assets acquired and was akin to organization costs.
Other Income. $195,000 of other income was the result of a settlement with a former client.
Discontinued Operations. Income from discontinued operations was $5,000 for 2011 compared to $0 for 2012. Income from discontinued operations during 2011 was generated from the post-merger operations of Aftermarket and the gain on the sale of the Aftermarket business to the former president of Aftermarket, which occurred on September 27, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2013, AllDigital had current assets of $1,075,770, including $912,400 in cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2012, AllDigital had current assets of $638,187, including $462,761 in cash and cash equivalents.
Cash increased $449,639 from $462,761 at December 31, 2012 to $912,400 at June 30, 2013, due primarily to net cash provided by operating activities of $490,083 in the first six months of 2013. Net cash provided by operating activities consisted of increases of $514,018 in deferred revenue, $82,791 in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and $110,628 in noncash adjustments and a decrease in accounts receivable of $14,335, offset by $229,410 operating loss and an increase of $2,279 in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Net cash used in operating activities was $351,529 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
$41,444 of cash was used in investing activities in the first six months of 2013 for the purchase of computer equipment. $26,760 was used in investing activities for the purchase of computer equipment, furniture and fixtures, and signs, and $8,500 was used for the purchase of a domain name in the first six months of 2012. $1,000 in cash was provided by financing activities in the first six months of 2013 as 4,000 common stock options were exercised by a former employee in the first quarter of 2013. No cash was provided by financing activities in the first six months of 2012.
AllDigital monitors its financial resources on an ongoing basis and may adjust planned business activities and operations as needed to ensure that it has sufficient operating capital. AllDigital evaluates its capital needs, and the availability and cost of capital on an ongoing basis and expects to seek capital when and on such terms as deemed appropriate based upon an assessment of then-current liquidity, capital needs, and the availability and cost of capital. Given AllDigital’s early stage of operations, its does not expect that bank or other institutional debt financing will be available. AllDigital expects that any capital it raises will be through the issuance of equity securities, warrants or similar securities. AllDigital believes that it will be able to obtain financing when and as needed, but may be required to pay a high price for capital.
Executive Officers and Directors of AllDigital
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of AllDigital’s current executive officers and directors. For information on the directors expected to serve as directors of the combined company effective as of the effective time of the merger, see “Executive Officers and Directors of Broadcast.”
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Paul Summers
|
47
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Timothy Napoleon
|
38
|
Chief Strategist
|
|
Stephen Smith
|
45
|
Vice President of Network Services and Director
|
|
John Walpuck
|
51
|
COO and CFO
|
|
David Williams
|
49
|
Director
|
|
Konstantin Wilms
|
41
|
Chief Architect
|
Executive Officers and Directors of Broadcast
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of Broadcast’s current executive officers and directors as well as the executive officers and directors of Broadcast who will be appointed at the effective time of the merger.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
William Boyd
|
71
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Rodney M. Tiede
|
51
|
President and Director
|
|
James E. Solomon
|
62
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
R. Phil Zobrist
|
66
|
Director
|
|
Steven Ledger
|
53
|
Director
|
|
Donald A. Harris
|
60
|
Director
|
|
Paul Summers
|
47
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director*
|
|
John Walpuck
|
51
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer*
|
|
Tim Napoleon
|
38
|
Chief Strategist*
|
|
Konstantin Wilms
|
41
|
Chief Architect*
|
|
Steve Smith
|
45
|
Vice President of Network Services*
|
|
David Williams
|
49
|
Director*
|
|
*Effective as of the effective time of the merger.
|
|
|
William A. Boyd has been a director since November 2007. Mr. Boyd has served as the Chairman of the Board of Agility Recovery Solutions, a privately held disaster recovery and business continuity company since 2006. He was CEO of Muzak Corporation from 1996 to 2000 and continued with Muzak in an advisory executive position and on the Board until August 2006. He became associated with Muzak Corporation in 1968 as a sales representative and continued as a manager and franchise owner until he became CEO in 1996. Mr. Boyd received a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science in 1963 from Beloit College in Wisconsin. Mr. Boyd’s CEO level experience with Muzak and his overall experience in satellite networks, management, operations and financing matters are qualities and expertise that were determined to be particularly useful as a member of Broadcast’s board of directors.
Rodney M. Tiede has been Broadcast’s president and a director since October 2003 and was Broadcast’s chief executive officer from October 2003 until July 2012. From August 2000 to the present, Mr. Tiede has been the president, chief executive officer and a director of BI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast. From April 2003 to the present, Mr. Tiede has also been the chief executive officer and a director of Interact Devices, Inc., or IDI, a consolidated subsidiary of Broadcast. From November 1987 to August 2000, Mr. Tiede was employed as director of sales, vice president and general manager of Broadcast. Mr. Tiede received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Washington in 1983. Mr. Tiede has been a part of Broadcast’s operations for more than 20 years and as a result has significant knowledge, insight and understanding that he provides as a director.
James E. Solomon has been Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Broadcast from September 2008. From 1995 to January 2002, Mr. Solomon was a business consultant primarily for emerging growth companies. In January 2002, he formed Corporate Development Services, Inc., a business consulting firm, and has served as President since its formation. From June 1993 to the present, Mr. Solomon has been an adjunct professor at the Graduate School of Business at the University of Utah. Mr. Solomon served on the Board of Directors of Nevada Chemicals, Inc., a public company, until October 2008, as well as several privately-held companies. Mr. Solomon received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Finance from the University of Utah in 1972. Mr. Solomon became a Certified Public Accountant in 1974. Mr. Solomon’s experience in finance, accounting and business consulting, together with his role as Broadcast’s CFO and prior public company directorship, provide Mr. Solomon with expertise enabling critical input to Broadcast’s decision-making processes.
R. Phillip Zobrist has been a director of Broadcast since June 2009. He currently manages his own investments and since 1996 has been President and Chairman of the Board of Valley Property Management, a privately held real estate management company headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, which he founded. He also serves as an independent consultant for Sundance Builders, LLC, a privately held real estate construction company and serves on the board of directors of Greffex, Inc., a start up bio-technology company in Aurora, Colorado. Mr. Zobrist was the president and CEO of a $150 million enterprise for more than ten years and gained valuable business experience in dealing with financing, employee relations, and sales and marketing that make his advice and counsel valuable for Broadcast.
Steven Ledger has been a director of Broadcast since May, 2011. He is the Founder of, and from September, 2002 to the present has been the Managing Partner at, Tamalpais Partners LLC, a privately held company that acts as a principal investor in, and advisor to, emerging growth companies. From August, 1999 to December, 2002 he served as co-founder and managing partner of eCompanies Venture Group, a privately held company that managed an Internet focused, strategic venture capital fund whose investors included Sprint, Disney, Earthlink and Sun America. From January, 1994 to December, 1999, Mr. Ledger served as the co-founder and managing partner of Storie Partners, L.P., a technology focused investment fund that provided early lead investment capital to Earthlink Networks and SeeBeyond Technologies Corporation (acquired by Sun Microsystems). From September, 1989 to October, 1993 Mr. Ledger was a managing partner with Kayne Anderson Investment Management. Mr. Ledger graduated from the University of Connecticut in 1982 with a BA in Economics. Mr. Ledger’s experience with technology companies and their financing was deemed valuable to Broadcast.
Donald A. Harris was appointed to Broadcast’s board of directors in June, 2012. He has been President of 1162 Management, the General Partner of 5 Star Partnership, a private equity firm, since June 2006. Mr. Harris has been President and Chief Executive Officer of UbiquiTel Inc., a telecommunications company organized by Mr. Harris and other investors, since its inception in September, 1999 and also its Chairman since May 2000. Mr. Harris served as the President of Comcast Cellular Communications Inc. from March 1992 to March 1997. Mr. Harris serves on the Board of Directors of Westower Corporation, a privately held company in the wireless communications industry. Mr. Harris received a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States Military Academy and an MBA from Columbia University. Mr. Harris’s experience in the telecommunications industry and his association with private equity funding qualify him as a director.
Paul Summers has served as AllDigital’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since late July 2011. Mr. Summers is a co-founder of AllDigital, and has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AllDigital since its inception in August 2009. Prior to AllDigital, Mr. Summers was a co-founder of VitalStream Holdings, Inc. where he served as President and CEO from 2000 to 2004. Prior to VitalStream, Mr. Summers founded AnaServe, Inc., in 1995. Anaserve was a privately held Web hosting company that sold to Concentric Network Corporation in 1998. During the periods from 1998 – 2000 and 2004 – 2009, Mr. Summers was self-employed, managing his investments. He has over 20 years of executive management and digital media services experience. He is an alumnus of the University of Southern California where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree. Mr. Summers was appointed as a director of AllDigital in light of his executive management experience with small public companies, his experience in the industry and his knowledge of the Company and its markets and products.
John Walpuck has served as AllDigital’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer since July 2011. Mr. Walpuck began serving as a consultant to AllDigital in July 2010, and was appointed the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AllDigital in December 2010. Mr. Walpuck brings over 25 years of experience in finance and general management to AllDigital. Prior to AllDigital, Mr. Walpuck served as the President and CEO of Disaboom, Inc., where he worked from 2007 to 2010. Disaboom is an online business and social network dedicated to people with disabilities. Prior to Disaboom, from 2005 to 2007, he served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nine Systems Corporation, a digital media services company acquired by Akamai (NYSE: AKAM) in 2007. Mr. Walpuck has an MBA from the University of Chicago. He is a CMA, CPA and holds other professional certifications.
Tim Napoleon has served as AllDigital’s Chief Strategist since February 2012 and a director since July 2011. Mr. Napoleon is a co-founder of AllDigital, Inc. and served as Vice President of Media Services of AllDigital, Inc. from its inception in August 2009 until July 2011 and in the same position for AllDigital Holdings until February 2012. In February 2012, he was appointed Chief Strategist of AllDigital Holdings, and no longer serves in the capacity of Vice President of Media Services. Prior to AllDigital, Mr. Napoleon was the Chief Strategist, Media and Entertainment, for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: AKAM), where he worked from 2005 until August 2009. Prior to Akamai, Mr. Napoleon was the Vice President of Business Development at VitalStream Holdings, Inc., where he worked from 2000 to 2005. Mr. Napoleon’s career background thus far has been as a digital media product architect, as well as a marketing and business development executive in the online media and entertainment industries for the past 10 years. Mr. Napoleon received his MBA from the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business after earning a Bachelor of Arts degree in Communications from the California State University at Fullerton.
Konstantin Wilms has served as AllDigital’s Chief Architect since July 2011. Mr. Wilms has over 16 years of experience in the design, development and deployment of media delivery systems in a range of markets including mobile, satellite, content delivery, encryption, and IPTV networks. Prior to AllDigital, Mr. Wilms served as Chief Architect at StreamingMediaHosting from 2008 through 2011, and was responsible for the architecture, design and development of the entire end-to-end service, which won multiple awards as the best American Content Delivery Network. Prior to this, he served in senior engineering roles at Logic Innovations and News Digital Systems amongst others. He has served on broadcast standards committees including OASIS-CAP (which defined the new post-9/11 Emergency Alerting Standard for the USA), and the ATSC A/92 (which defined the Data Broadcast standard for digital delivery of IP data over terrestrial networks for the USA, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, and Honduras). Mr. Wilms earned his Bachelor of Science degree (Hons) from Nelson Mandela University.
Steve Smith has served as AllDigital’s Vice President of Network Services and a director since July 2011. Mr. Smith is a co-founder of AllDigital, and has served as the Vice President of Network Services and a Director of AllDigital since September 2009. Mr. Smith has over 25 years of highly specialized experience in a wide variety of storage technologies, hosting applications and digital broadcasting solutions delivery technologies. From October 2006 to September 2009, Mr. Smith was the Founder and President of HCI, which provided specialized technical and security-intensive management services for a variety of Internet-based companies. Prior to HCI, Mr. Smith served as the CTO of VitalStream Holdings, Inc.'s integrated content services business unit, where he worked from 2000 through October 2006.
David Williams has been a director of AllDigital since September 2011. Mr. Williams is presently the president and owner of Advanced Dental Designs, a specialty manufacturer of precision dental equipment, where he has worked since 2009. Prior to this, from 2006 to 2009, he was the Manager of Affiliate Operations for Google, where he oversaw a national team managing 1,600 radio stations as part of Google’s ad network. From 2005 to 2006, Mr. Williams was the Manager of Affiliate Operations at dMarc Broadcasting (acquired by Google for $475M cash). From 2001 to 2005, he was the VP of Operations at VitalStream, where he managed several teams responsible for solutions deployment, customer service and network operations. Before VitalStream, Mr. Williams had co-founded SiteStream along with Steve Smith, which was later acquired by VitalStream. Mr. Williams received his MBA in Finance from Wharton Business School and received his Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with an accounting major from the University of Southern California. Mr. Williams was appointed as a director of AllDigital in light of his experience in of the industry.
Broadcast’s directors generally serve until the next annual or special meeting of stockholders held for the purpose of electing directors. Broadcast’s officers generally serve at the discretion of the board of directors.
In connection with the merger and as required by the merger agreement, it is anticipated that Messrs. Tiede and Solomon will resign as officers, and Messrs. Boyd, Tiede, Zobrist and Ledger will resign as directors, effective as of the effective time of the merger. At the same time, it is anticipated that Messrs. Summers, Walpuck, Napoleon, Wilms and Smith will be appointed as executive officers of Broadcast and Messrs. Summers and Williams will be appointed to serve as directors of Broadcast.
Board and Committee Matters
During 2012, Broadcast’s board of directors held twelve meetings and took four separate actions by unanimous written consent resolution. Each serving director attended at least 75% of the board meetings . The board of directors is accountable to Broadcast stockholders to build long-term financial performance and value. The board of directors’ responsibilities include overseeing the business and affairs of Broadcast, hiring and evaluating its chief executive officer; providing guidance, counsel and direction to management in formulating and evaluating operational strategies; monitoring company performance and capital requirements; and ensuring adherence to ethical practices and compliance with federal and state laws, including providing full and fair disclosure to stockholders pursuant to SEC regulations. Broadcast encourages, but does not require, directors and director nominees to attend stockholder meetings.
Broadcast maintains an audit committee and a compensation committee of the board, each of which is discussed below. Broadcast’s board of directors has determined that each of its current directors is “independent” under the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ listing standards, except for Mr. Tiede, Broadcast’s president. The board has made no determination with regard to the three new directors to be appointed at the effective time of the merger, but Paul Summers will not be an independent director as the terms of the merger agreement require that he be appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Broadcast effective as of the effective time of the merger.
Broadcast does not have a nominating committee of the board. Because all Broadcast directors participate in the consideration of director nominees, Broadcast’s board believes that such a committee is not necessary at this time. Broadcast does not have a formal policy concerning stockholder recommendations of candidates for board of director membership. Broadcast’s board believes that a formal policy is not necessary at the present time given the board’s willingness to consider candidates recommended by stockholders. Broadcast stockholders may recommend candidates by writing to Broadcast’s Secretary at its principal offices: 6952 S. High Tech Drive, Suite C, Midvale, Utah 84047-3772 , giving the candidate’s name, contact information, biographical data and qualifications. A written statement from the candidate consenting to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director should accompany any such recommendation. Stockholders who wish to nominate a director for election are generally advised to submit a shareholder proposal no later than December 31 for the next year’s annual meeting of shareholders.
Audit Committee and Financial Expert
Broadcast’s audit committee currently includes Messrs. Boyd and Zobrist. Mr. Boyd serves as chairman of the audit committee. The functions of the audit committee include engaging an independent registered public accounting firm to audit Broadcast’s annual financial statements, reviewing the independence of Broadcast’s auditors, the financial statements and the auditors’ report, and reviewing management’s administration of Broadcast’s system of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. The board of directors has adopted a written audit committee charter. A current copy of the Broadcast audit committee charter is available to security holders on Broadcast’s website at www.brin.com. The board has determined that each of the current members of the audit committee is “independent” under the definition of independence in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ listing standards and Section 10A(m)(3) under the Exchange Act.
Broadcast’s board of directors has determined that Mr. Boyd meets the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC regulations.
Membership in the Broadcast audit committee following the merger will be determined following the merger by Broadcast’s post-merger board of directors.
Broadcast’s compensation committee currently includes Messrs. Boyd and Zobrist. Mr. Zobrist serves as chairman of the compensation committee. The functions of the compensation committee include reviewing and approving corporate goals relevant to compensation for executive officers, evaluating the effectiveness of Broadcast’s compensation practices, evaluating and approving the compensation of Broadcast’s executive officers, recommending compensation for board members, and reviewing and making recommendations regarding incentive compensation and other employee benefit plans. Broadcast’s board of directors has adopted a written compensation committee charter. A current copy of the compensation committee charter is available to security holders on Broadcast’s website at www.brin.com. The board has determined that each of the members of the compensation committee is “independent” under the definition of independence in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ listing standards.
Membership in the Broadcast audit committee following the merger will be determined following the merger by Broadcast’s post-merger board of directors.
Board Leadership
The role of chairman of the board of directors and principal executive officer are held by separate people at Broadcast. Mr. Boyd, who is not an officer of Broadcast, serves as the chairman of Broadcast’s board of directors while Mr. Tiede is Broadcast’s principal executive officer.
Communication with the Board
Broadcast has not, to date, developed a formal process for stockholder communications with the board of directors. Broadcast believes that its current informal process, in which any communication sent to the board of directors, either generally or in care of the chief executive officer, secretary or other corporate officer or director, is forwarded to all members of the board of directors, has served the board’s and the stockholders’ needs.
Conflicts of Interests
On an annual basis, each Broadcast director and executive officer is obligated to complete a director and officer questionnaire that requires disclosure of any transactions with Broadcast, including related person transactions reportable under SEC rules, in which the director or executive officer, or any member of his or her immediate family, have a direct or indirect material interest. Under Broadcast’s standards of conduct for employees, all employees, including the executive officers, are expected to avoid conflicts of interest. Pursuant to Broadcast’s code of ethics for the chief executive officer and senior finance officers (as discussed below), such officers are prohibited from engaging in any conflict of interest unless a specific exception has been granted by the board. All of Broadcast’s directors are subject to general fiduciary standards to act in the best interests of Broadcast and its stockholders. Conflicts of interest involving an executive officer or a director are generally resolved by the board.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Broadcast’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of its common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Broadcast common stock and other equity securities. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To Broadcast’s knowledge, during the year ended December 31, 2012, its directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, although on two occasions filings for all of Broadcast’s directors’ filings were late.
Broadcast has adopted a code of ethics for its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code of ethics is included on Broadcast’s website at www.brin.com.
Compensation of Directors
For a discussion of the compensation of Broadcast directors, please see the section entitled “Director Compensation” beginning on page 135.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – BROADCAST
Throughout this section, the individuals who served as Broadcast’s chief executive officer and/or president and chief financial officer during 2012 are collectively referred to as the “named executive officers.”
Broadcast’s compensation committee has overall responsibility to review and approve Broadcast’s compensation structure, policy and programs and to assess whether the compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees. The compensation committee annually reviews and determines the salary and any bonus and equity compensation that may be awarded to Broadcast’s chief executive officer and/or president, or CEO/President and its chief financial officer, or CFO. The compensation committee oversees the administration of Broadcast’s long-term incentive plan and employee benefit plans.
The compensation committee’s chairman regularly reports to Broadcast’s board on compensation committee actions and recommendations. The compensation committee has authority to retain, at its expense, outside counsel, experts, compensation consultants and other advisors as needed.
2012 and 2011 Company Performance. Because of the stage of Broadcast’s development, the compensation committee looks at various factors in evaluating the progress Broadcast has made and the services provided by the named executive officers. In considering executive compensation, the compensation committee noted certain aspects of Broadcast’s financial performance and accomplishments in 2012 and 2011 including the following:
|
|
·
|
Operations. Broadcast’s revenues decreased approximately 11% from $8,446,082 in 2011 to $7,523,624 in 2012, which was principally the result of decreased services provided for its largest customer in 2012. This customer has more retail locations than all of Broadcast’s other existing customers combined. Broadcast was able to install its proprietary digital signage delivery and management hardware and software, which incorporates portions of Broadcast’s CodecSys software, at approximately 2,500 locations and managed approximately 33,000 screens for this customer as of December 31, 2012. For the first time, Broadcast did not receive a 100% vendor rating by the client. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, Broadcast’s license fees revenue increased by $396,847, revenue from studio and production services increased by $137,606 and revenue from web services and other services increased by $142,388. However, these increases in revenues were offset by a decrease in system sales and installation revenue of $1,588,277, almost all of which resulted from fewer work orders from Broadcast’s largest customer.
|
|
|
·
|
CodecSys Milestones. Broadcast’s executive officers also made significant progress on the development of the CodecSys technology. In 2011, Broadcast added Fujitsu North America to its list of technology partners and sales channel partners. Broadcast trained salesmen and sales engineers for Fujitsu as an integral part of Fujitsu’s sales initiative for 2012, which has yielded no significant revenues. Fujitsu joins IBM, Microsoft, and HP as large companies that have included Broadcast’s video compression technology as a video compression solution and have proceeded with sales presentations and testing with their large video customers, which include large broadcasters, cable companies, and satellite companies.
|
|
|
·
|
During 2011 and 2012, Broadcast expanded the installed base of test locations of its CodecSys version 2.0 to over 35 locations consisting principally of large international telecommunication companies and have moved toward contract with most of the test sites.
|
|
|
·
|
In December 2011, Broadcast entered into its first customer agreement with a cable company located in Mexico to utilize CodecSys technology in providing an “over-the-top” product offering to the cable company’s subscribers. CodecSys was installed at the cable company and is operational in providing the service. During 2012, Broadcast continued its development of this opportunity, and although there have not been material revenues generated from the contract, it is important because it represents the first commercial installation of Broadcast’s CodecSys product.
|
Compensation Philosophy. Broadcast’s general compensation philosophy is designed to link an employee’s total cash compensation with Broadcast’s performance, the employee’s department goals and individual performance. Given Broadcast’s stage of operations and limited capital resources, it is subject to various financial restraints in its compensation practices. As an employee’s level of responsibility increases, there is a more significant level of variability and compensation at risk. The compensation committee believes linking incentive compensation to Broadcast’s performance creates an environment in which employees are stakeholders in Broadcast’s success and, thus, benefits all stockholders.
Executive Compensation Policy. Broadcast’s executive compensation policy is designed to establish an appropriate relationship between executive pay and annual performance, long-term growth objectives, individual performance of the executive officer and ability to attract and retain qualified executive officers. The compensation committee attempts to achieve these goals by integrating competitive annual base salaries with bonuses based on corporate performance and on the achievement of specified performance objectives, and to a lesser extent, awards through Broadcast’s long-term incentive plan. The compensation committee believes that cash compensation in the form of salary and bonus provides executives with short-term rewards for success in operations. The compensation committee also believes Broadcast’s executive compensation policy and programs do not promote inappropriate risk-taking behavior by executive officers that could threaten the value of the company.
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
The compensation committee makes all compensation decisions for the named executive officers and approves recommendations regarding equity awards to all other senior management personnel. The CEO/President annually reviews the performance of the CFO and other senior management. The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual award amounts, are presented to the compensation committee. The compensation committee is charged with the responsibility of ensuring a consistent compensation plan throughout the company and providing an independent evaluation of the proposed adjustments or awards at all levels of management. As such, the compensation committee has determined that it have the discretion to modify or adjust any proposed awards and changes to management compensation to be able to satisfy these responsibilities.
2012 Executive Compensation Components
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the principal components of compensation for the named executive officers were:
|
|
performance-based bonus compensation.
|
Base Salary. The compensation committee determined that the executive officers had been compensated fairly relative to similarly situated executives, and approved decreases in 2012 to the base salary of the CEO/President and CFO. In determining the base salary of each executive officer, the compensation committee relied on publicly available information gathered by the compensation committee related to salaries paid to executive officers of similarly situated small public companies.
Performance-based Incentive Compensation. Annual incentives for the executive officers are intended to recognize and reward those employees who contribute meaningfully to an increase in shareholder value and move the company toward profitability. No cash bonuses were paid for 2012 due to fiscal restraints and no restricted stock units were issued to executive officers.
Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation. Long-term incentive compensation encourages participants to focus on Broadcast’s long-term performance and provides an opportunity for executive officers and certain designated key employees to increase their stake in Broadcast through grants of options to purchase Broadcast common stock. No stock options or restricted stock units were granted during 2012 to any of the named executive officers. The board made awards of stock options to other employees under Broadcast’s equity incentive plan.
All awards made under Broadcast’s equity incentive plan are made at the market price at the time of the award. Annual awards of stock options to executives are made at the discretion of the compensation committee at such times throughout the year at it deems most desirable. Newly hired or promoted executives, other than executive officers, generally receive their award of stock options on the first business day of the month following their hire or promotion. Grants of stock options to newly hired executive officers who are eligible to receive them are made at the next regularly scheduled compensation committee meeting following their hire date.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. Broadcast provides no perquisites to its named executive officers other than matching 401(k) contributions described below and other group benefits offered generally to all salaried employees.
Retirement and Related Plans. Broadcast maintains a 401(k) profit sharing plan for all non-temporary employees. Employee contributions are matched by Broadcast in an amount of 100% of employee contributions up to 3% of employee salaries and 50% of employee contributions up to an additional 2% of their salaries. Participants vest immediately in the company matching contributions.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer/President. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, Broadcast paid Rodney M. Tiede, CEO/President, a salary of $225,690, representing a decrease from a salary of $250,690 paid to Mr. Tiede in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. The compensation committee met with Mr. Tiede twice during 2012 to review his performance and individual objectives and goals versus results achieved. The compensation committee reviewed all components of the CEO’s compensation, including salary, bonus, and equity incentive compensation, and under potential severance and change-in-control scenarios. Mr. Tiede’s compensation package was determined to be reasonable and not excessive by the compensation committee based on compensation surveys for chief executive officers of small public companies. The compensation committee also considered the continuing economic recession and market conditions in determining the compensation of the CEO/President or other management personnel.
In April 2004, Broadcast and Mr. Tiede entered into an employment agreement covering Mr. Tiede’s employment for a term commencing upon the execution thereof and continuing until December 31, 2006. The contract continues for additional terms of one year each until terminated by Broadcast or Mr. Tiede. The agreement calls for payment of a gross annual salary of not less than $120,000, payable in equal bi-weekly installments for the year ended December 31, 2004, subject to such increases as the board of directors may approve. The employment agreement further provides that Mr. Tiede shall receive a performance bonus on an annual basis equal to up to 100% of his base salary for the fiscal year then ended, the exact percentage to be determined in the sole discretion of the board of directors (or the compensation committee thereof) based upon an evaluation of the performance of Mr. Tiede during the previous fiscal year. The agreement also provides for participation in Broadcast’s stock option plan, the payment of severance pay, and other standard benefits such as vacation, participation in Broadcast’s other benefit plans and reimbursement for necessary and reasonable business expenses. In the event of a change in control of the company, defined as the purchase of shares of Broadcast capital stock enabling any person or persons to cast 20% or more of the votes entitled to be voted at any meeting to elect directors, Mr. Tiede shall have the right to terminate the employment agreement and receive severance pay equal to the base salary and a bonus equal to 50% of the salary for the remainder of the employment term or two years, whichever is longer. In addition, if the change of control event results in Broadcast shareholders exchanging their shares for stock or other consideration, Mr. Tiede shall receive an amount equal to the per share price paid to the shareholders less the pre-announcement price multiplied by 50,000.
In September 2008, Broadcast and Mr. Solomon entered into an employment agreement covering Mr. Solomon’s employment for a term commencing upon the execution thereof and continuing until December 31, 2011. The contract continues for additional terms of one year each until terminated by Broadcast. The agreement calls for payment of a gross annual salary of not less than $225,000, payable in equal bi-weekly installments for the year ended December 31, 2008, subject to such increases as the board of directors may approve. The employment agreement further provides that Mr. Solomon shall receive a performance bonus on an annual basis equal to up to 100% of his base salary for the fiscal year then ended, the exact percentage to be determined in the sole discretion of the board of directors (or the compensation committee thereof) based upon an evaluation of the performance of Mr. Solomon during the previous fiscal year. The agreement also provides for participation in Broadcast’s stock option plan, the payment of severance pay, and other standard benefits such as vacation, participation in Broadcast’s other benefit plans and reimbursement for necessary and reasonable business expenses. In the event of a change in control of the company, defined as the purchase of shares of Broadcast capital stock enabling any person or persons to cast 20% or more of the votes entitled to be voted at any meeting to elect directors, Mr. Solomon shall have the right to terminate the employment agreement and receive severance pay equal to the base salary and a bonus equal to 50% of the salary for the remainder of the employment term or two years, whichever is longer. In addition, if the change of control event results in Broadcast shareholders exchanging their shares for stock or other consideration, Mr. Solomon shall receive an amount equal to the per share price paid to the shareholders less the pre-announcement price multiplied by 50,000.
On January 6, 2013, Broadcast entered into an Amendment and Settlement Agreement with each of Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon, modifying their respective existing employment agreements described above as follows: the salary of each officer is reduced to $180,000 per year, each officer’s employment is terminable at will, each officer is to report to the executive committee of the board of directors, each officer’s termination and change of control benefits are terminated, each officer waives his accrued vacation benefits, each officer and Broadcast grant each other mutual releases, and Broadcast agrees to issue to each officer 529,100 shares of Broadcast common stock if such officer remains employed by Broadcast for 60 days following January 6, 2013, or if such officer is terminated by Broadcast at any time following January 6, 2013.
Stock Option Plans
Under Broadcast’s 2004 Long-term Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), the board of directors may issue incentive stock options to employees and directors and non-qualified stock options to consultants of the company. Options generally may not be exercised until twelve months after the date granted and expire ten years after being granted. Options granted vest in accordance with the vesting schedule determined by the board of directors, usually ratably over a three-year vesting schedule upon the anniversary date of the grant. Should an employee’s director’s or consultant’s relationship with the company terminate before the vesting period is completed, the unvested portion of each grant is forfeited. Broadcast continues to maintain and grant awards under the 2004 Plan which will remain in effect until the earlier of its expiration by its terms or its termination as required by the merger agreement. The number of unissued stock options authorized under the 2004 Plan at December 31, 2012 was 3,779,508.
The Broadcast International, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) has become Broadcast’s primary plan for providing stock-based incentive compensation to its eligible employees and non-employee directors and consultants of the company. The provisions of the 2008 Plan are similar to the 2004 Plan except that the 2008 Plan allows for the grant of share equivalents such as restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, performance shares and restricted stock units in addition to non-qualified and incentive stock options. The number of unissued shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2008 Plan was 774,867 at December 31, 2012.
The purpose of Broadcast’s incentive plans is to advance the interests of Broadcast stockholders by enhancing Broadcast’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who are expected to make important contributions to the company by providing them with both equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives intended to align their interests with those of Broadcast’s stockholders. These plans are designed to provide Broadcast with flexibility to select from among various equity-based compensation methods, and to be able to address changing accounting and tax rules and corporate governance practices by optimally utilizing stock options and shares of common stock.
Summary Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of the named executive officers in their respective capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. When setting total compensation for each of the named executive officers, the compensation committee reviewed tally sheets which show the executive’s current compensation, including equity and non-equity based compensation. Broadcast has omitted in this report certain tables and columns otherwise required to be included because there was no compensation made with respect to such tables and columns, as permitted by applicable SEC regulations. The amounts shown as salary in the following table for 2010 include an amount equal to 10% of total salary for each executive which had been accrued for 2009, but the payment was deferred and paid and included in 2010 compensation shown below.
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
|
Name and
Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Restricted
Stock
Unit
Awards ($)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)(1)
|
Total
($)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodney M. Tiede
President & Chief Executive
Officer*
|
2012
2011
2010
|
$225,690
250,690
273,078
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
$555,000
--
|
$4,841
7,333
7,333
|
$230,531
813,023
280,411
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Solomon
Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
|
2012
2011
2010
|
$256,980
256,980
283,270
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
$333,000
--
|
$9,494
10,200
11,331
|
$240,974
600,180
294,601
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts shown in column (g) reflect for each named executive officer matching contributions made by Broadcast to its 401(k) employee retirement plan. The amounts shown in column (g) do not reflect premiums paid by Broadcast for any group health or other insurance policies that apply generally to all salaried employees on a nondiscriminatory basis.
|
|
*
|
From and after July 16, 2012, Mr. Tiede served as Broadcast’s president and no officer held the title of chief executive officer.
|
Broadcast does not have any non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
| |
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value of
shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
($)
|
Number of
Unearned
shares,
units or
other
rights that
have not
vested
(#)
|
Market or
payout value
of unearned
shares, units
or other
rights that
have not
vested ($)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
|
Rodney M. Tiede
|
50,000
|
--
|
2.25
|
04/28/2014
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
James E. Solomon
|
75,000
25,000
|
--
--
|
2.25
1.17
|
09/15/2015
12/27/2016
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
The amount of compensation payable to the named executive officers upon voluntary termination, retirement, involuntary not-for-cause termination, termination following a change of control and in the event of disability or death of the executive of prior employment agreements is summarized below. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2012, and thus include amounts earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon their termination if it were to occur as of such date. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation.
As discussed above, Broadcast entered into an Amendment and Settlement Agreement with each of the named executive officers on January 6, 2013, that terminated each officer’s change of control benefits as of such date.
Payments Made Upon Termination
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment is terminated, he is entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment. Such amounts include:
|
|
·
|
grants under Broadcast’s stock option and equity plans, subject to the vesting and other terms applicable to such grants;
|
|
|
·
|
amounts contributed and vested under Broadcast’s 401(k) plan; and
|
In addition to the amounts above, pursuant to the January 6, 2013 Amendment and Settlement Agreement with each of Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon, modifying their respective employment agreements, Broadcast agreed to issue each of Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon 529,100 shares of common stock if such officer is terminated by Broadcast at any time following January 6, 2013. All other termination benefits and severance benefits for Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon, except for those set forth in this section, were terminated as of January 6, 2013.
Payments Made Upon Death or Disability
In the event of the death or disability of a named executive officer, in addition to the benefits listed under the heading “Payments Made Upon Termination,” the named executive officers will receive benefits under any group life or disability insurance plan, as appropriate, that Broadcast may have in effect from time to time. Broadcast currently maintains a group term life insurance plan that generally pays a death benefit equal to two times base salary up to a maximum of $300,000.
Payments Made Upon a Change of Control
As of December 31, 2012, if there is a change of control, which is defined as the purchase of shares of capital stock of the company enabling any person or persons to cast 20% or more of the votes entitled to be voted at any meeting to elect directors, Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon may each elect to terminate employment and would receive under the terms of their employment agreements:
|
|
·
|
a lump sum severance payment up to the sum of two years of the base salary;
|
|
|
·
|
any bonus compensation earned, if any; and
|
|
|
·
|
If the change of control event results in Broadcast stockholders exchanging their shares for stock, the executive would receive an amount equal to the per share price paid to stockholders, less the pre-announcement share price, multiplied by 50,000. For example and illustration purposes only, if the share price paid to stockholders were $3.00 and the pre-announcement share price were $1.50, Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon would receive an amount equal to $75,000 under this provision.
|
In the event of a change in control as defined above, Mr. Tiede would receive a lump sum payment of $500,000 and Mr. Solomon would receive a lump sum payment of $510,000. In addition, they would be entitled to receive the share price differential, if any, as discussed above.
As discussed above, Broadcast entered into an Amendment and Settlement Agreement with each of the named executive officers on January 6, 2013, that terminated each such officer’s termination and change of control benefits as of such date. As a result, neither Mr. Tiede nor Mr. Solomon will receive any payment upon consummation of a change of control.
Non-compete Agreement
Included in Mr. Tiede’s and Mr. Solomon’s employment agreements is a two year non-compete agreement.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
None of Broadcast’s executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee or as a director of any other company during 2012.
Director Compensation
Broadcast uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on its board of directors. In setting director compensation, Broadcast considers the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties as well as the skill-level required by Broadcast of members of the board.
Broadcast’s non-employee directors generally receive fees of $48,000 per year, paid quarterly, and an initial grant of stock options to purchase 100,000 shares (thereafter annual grants of 25,000 options or restricted stock units) of Broadcast common stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Given Broadcast’s financial condition in 2012, the board approved and the non-employee directors accepted the 2012 compensation set forth in the director summary compensation table below. In addition, non-employee directors may be entitled to receive special awards of stock options from time to time as determined by the board. The chairman of the board and the chairman of each of the audit and compensation committees receive no additional fees for serving in such capacities. There is no additional compensation for meeting attendance. Directors who are employees of Broadcast receive no additional compensation for serving as directors. All stock options granted to outside directors are immediately exercisable and expire ten years from the date of grant. All restricted stock units granted to outside directors are immediately vested and are settled by the issuance of Broadcast common stock upon their respective retirements from the board of directors. Directors are reimbursed for ordinary expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings. The directors voluntarily deferred a significant portion of their 2012 cash compensation and agreed to receive common shares of Broadcast in 2013 in payment of the accrued directors’ fees.
Director Summary Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by Broadcast to its directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
|
Name
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($) (1)
|
Options/Awards
($)
|
Restricted Stock
Units ($) (2)
|
Total ($)
|
|
William Boyd
|
$27,000
|
--
|
$ 7,000
|
$34,000
|
|
Mark F. Spagnolo(3)
|
27,000
|
--
|
7,000
|
34,000
|
|
Rodney M. Tiede (4)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
R. Phil Zobrist
|
27,000
|
--
|
7,000
|
34,000
|
|
Steven Ledger
|
27,000
|
|
7,000
|
34,000
|
|
Donald A. Harris (5)
|
6,500
|
--
|
37,500
|
44,000
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Of the fees earned, $15,000 was accrued and remained unpaid to each of Messrs. Boyd, Spagnolo, Zobrist and Ledger and $6,500 was accrued and remained unpaid to Mr. Harris at December 31, 2012.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Each of Messrs. Boyd, Spagnolo, Zobrist and Ledger were granted a total of 58,553 restricted stock units with an estimated value of $7,000. Mr. Harris was granted a total of 155,921 restricted stock units with an estimated value of $37,500, including 100,000 restricted stock units upon his appointment to Broadcast’s board of directors.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Spagnolo resigned from the board of directors effective February 12, 2013.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Tiede receives no compensation for serving as a director, but is compensated in his capacity as Broadcast’s CEO/President.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Harris was appointed to Broadcast’s board of directors in June 2012.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION – ALLDIGITAL
Compensation Processes and Procedures
Because of AllDigital’s early stage of operations and limited resources, its process for determining compensation is informal. AllDigital does not have a compensation committee or a compensation committee charter. AllDigital has not, and in the near future does not expect to, engage a compensation consultant with respect to compensation. Compensation decisions are made by the entire board of directors of AllDigital, including Paul Summers, its Chief Executive Officer, based upon the board of directors’ subjective determination of what salaries AllDigital can afford with its limited resources and what level of equity-based compensation is necessary to attract and retain key personnel. Based upon the subjective knowledge of the industry and other public companies, AllDigital believes that its salaries currently in place or proposed for its executive officers are below market. In the future, particularly as AllDigital hires outside personnel without significant equity stakes, AllDigital expects that the cash portion of the compensation for new, and possibly existing, executives will increase.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the total compensation of AllDigital’s “named executive officers”, which include (i) any person who served as AllDigital’s Chief Executive Officer during the most recent fiscal year, and (ii) the two most highly compensated other executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during either of the last two fiscal years.
|
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(3)(2)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
Paul Summers
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
144,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,468
|
|
|
$
|
188,468
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer(4)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,238
|
|
|
$
|
175,238
|
|
|
Tim Napoleon
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
144,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
27,942
|
|
|
$
|
189,942
|
|
|
Chief Strategist(4)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
129,932
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
27,442
|
|
|
$
|
174,374
|
|
|
John Walpuck,
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
144,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
84,079
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
246,079
|
|
|
CFO and COO (4)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
90,313
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
257,313
|
|
|
(1)
|
Information with respect to employment agreements is set forth in “Executive Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements” below.
|
| |
|
|
(2)
|
The value of equity awards was calculated based on the aggregate grant date fair value of $.17 per share and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information on assumptions used in calculating such value, see the Financial Statements, Note 7 Stockholders’ Equity -- Stock Options.
|
| |
|
|
(3)
|
Represents a reimbursement of health insurance costs.
|
| |
|
|
(4)
|
Assumed office in July 2011 in connection with the Aftermarket Merger.
|
Executive Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements
AllDigital entered into employment agreements with each of the named executive officers as of August 1, 2011, each of which was amended as of June 28, 2013. Except for differences in the titles and duties of the executive officers and as otherwise described below, each of the employment agreements is in the same form.
The employment agreements provide for a minimum salary of $144,000 per annum for each of the executive officers. As amended, the employment agreement provide that the base salaries of the executive officers will be increased by a minimum of 15% within 60 days of the date AllDigital and its consolidated affiliates achieves a cash and modified accounts receivable level of $3,500,000.
Pursuant to each the employment agreements, the executive officer is entitled to the minimum base salary specified in the prior paragraph and an annual bonus target opportunity equal to 50% of his base salary upon achievement of certain performance measures on a quarterly basis, and standard health and other benefits. The executive officer’s employment relationship is “at-will.” The employment agreement includes a provision relating to the protection of confidential information, a covenant by the executive officer to work and reside in Orange County, California, a non-competition covenant during the term of his employment and a 12-month non-solicitation covenant. Under the employment agreement, if the executive officer’s employment is terminated by him for good reason, which includes, (a) a material change in the terms and conditions of his employment, (b) a change in the principal place of employment materially increasing his commute time, or (c) any other event that is a functional equivalent of an involuntary termination and which falls within the safe-harbor provisions related to termination for good reason set forth in the regulations implementing Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, he is entitled to a severance benefit equal to his base salary and health benefits for one year. If the executive officer is terminated by AllDigital without cause, he is entitled to a severance benefit equal to his base salary and health benefits for one year. None of the executive officers are entitled to any severance if his employment is terminated at any time by AllDigital with cause or by the executive officer without good reason.
In addition to the foregoing, Mr. Walpuck’s employment agreement includes a provision under which the vesting of his unvested stock options automatically accelerates upon a change of control. Mr. Walpuck has waived the application of this provision with respect to the proposed merger with Broadcast.
Change of Control Compensation
Golden Parachute Compensation -- AllDigital
The following table sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation for AllDigital’s named executive officers based on the proposed merger, assuming that the merger is completed on May 31, 2013 and each of the named executive officers is terminated without cause on the same day.
Golden Parachute Compensation—AllDigital(1)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Equity/
Performance
Awards
|
|
|
Pension /
NQDC
|
|
|
Perquisites /
Benefits
|
|
|
Tax
Reimburs-
ement
|
|
|
Total(3)
|
|
|
Paul Summers, Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Tim Napoleon, Chief
Strategist
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
John Walpuck, CFO and
COO
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
$
|
0(2)
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents amounts payable by AllDigital, Inc. under its existing agreements with the named executive officers. None of the named executive officers has entered into an employment agreement with Broadcast.
|
|
(2)
|
Because Mr. Walpuck has waived the application of a provision in his employment agreement that would have caused certain unvested options to become exercisable upon closing of the merger, the value of such provisions is reported as zero. Had Mr. Walpuck not waived the application of such accelerated vesting provision, the value would have been reported as $497,556, which represents the value of 695,208 unvested options to purchase AllDigital common stock held by Mr. Walpuck, the vesting of which is accelerated upon the closing of the merger. The value of each such option is determined as the amount by which $1.01, the average closing market price for AllDigital’s common stock over five business days following the announcement of the merger on January 7, 2013 (during which period no actual trading occurred), exceeds the exercise price of the such option. Any options that were not in the money using the average closing price for such five-day period are excluded.
|
|
(3)
|
This amount includes the aggregate dollar value of the sum of all amounts reported in the preceding columns.
|
The tabular disclosure does not include information with respect to cash severance that the named executive officers may be entitled to upon termination of their employment without cause or for good reason because such provisions do not reference and are not affected by change of control events. For information on the general severance benefits of the named executive officers if their employment is terminated under specified circumstances, see “Executive Compensation Information – ALLDIGITAL–Executive Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements”. None of the named executive officers is entitled to any pension, perquisite, tax reimbursement of similar benefits in connection with the termination of their employment.
Non-Equity Incentive Plans
Under their employment agreements, each of AllDigital’s executive officers is entitled to an annual bonus target opportunity equal to 50% of his base salary (or $72,000) upon achievement of certain corporate-level performance criteria. The criteria are set in advance of each calendar quarter, and the independent director of AllDigital’s board of directors determines following each quarter whether the criteria have been met and bonuses should be paid. AllDigital’s board of directors approved Management Bonus Opportunity (MBO) bonus programs for the first, second, and third quarters of 2012 for the four executive officers. The MBO targets for the first quarter of 2012 were based upon current assets and current ratio targets to be realized at the end of the quarter. The MBO targets for the second and third quarters of 2012 were based upon cash equivalents and current ratio targets to be realized at the end of each quarter. The MBO targets were met for the first quarter of 2012, but were not met for the second and third quarters of 2012. Bonuses of $18,000 were paid to each of the executive officers with respect to 2012.
For 2013, AllDigital’s board of directors determined that, due to the manner in which expenses associated the merger may affect current ratio, cash equivalent and other possible targets, quarterly bonuses would be given in the discretion of the independent director on AllDigital’s board of directors. Quarter MBO plans will identify criteria that the independent director will consider in exercising his discretion, but he will have broad discretion in deciding whether to award, or not award, quarterly bonuses.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information regarding equity awards held by AllDigital’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2012:
| |
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
|
|
|
John Walpuck
|
|
|
906,250
|
|
|
|
593,750
|
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
07/28/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
John Walpuck
|
|
|
119,583
|
|
|
|
290,417
|
(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
11/02/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
Vest at 31,250 per month through July 2014
|
| |
|
|
(2)
|
25% vested in October 2011, the balance vest equally over the following 36 months
|
None of AllDigital’s named executive officers held any equity awards as of December 31, 2012.
Compensation of AllDigital Directors
|
Director Compensation
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
David Williams
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
12,750
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
12,750
|
|
|
(1)
|
The value of equity awards was calculated based on the aggregate grant date fair value of $.17 per share and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information on assumptions used in calculating such value, see the Financial Statements, Note 7 Stockholders’ Equity -- Stock Options.
|
Paul Summers, Timothy Napoleon and Steve Smith did not receive any compensation as directors of AllDigital as they are compensated as executive officers.
In 2011, AllDigital granted David Williams a total of 150,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share during a ten-year term. 75,000 options vest one year after grant date and 75,000 options vested upon two years of service on AllDigital’s board of directors, provided that Mr. Williams is elected or re-elected at a shareholder meeting to continue to serve as a member of AllDigital’s board of directors through the two years after grant date. In the event Mr. Williams serves on AllDigital’s board of directors for a period between one and two years, the remaining 75,000 options will be vested pro-rata for the period between one and two years of service. The options have a fair value of $0.17 each. David Williams received no AllDigital options in 2012.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS — BROADCAST
In January 2011, Broadcast granted options to Leon Frenkel, the holder of its $1.0 million unsecured convertible note and a greater-than-5% stockholder of Broadcast, to acquire up to 500,000 shares of Broadcast common stock for services performed pursuant to a consulting agreement with Mr. Frenkel. The options were exercisable at $1.00 per share and were exercisable for five years. These options were converted to 250,000 shares of Broadcast common stock in January 2012.
In April 2011, Broadcast issued 293,517 shares of its common stock and granted a warrant to acquire an additional 146,758 shares of its common stock in payment of accrued interest to Leon Frenkel, the holder of its $1.0 million unsecured convertible note and a greater-than 5% stockholder of Broadcast. The warrant is exercisable at $.90 per share and expires five years from the date of issuance.
In March and April of 2012, R. Phillip Zobrist, a Broadcast director, invested a total of $50,000 in Broadcast as a part of the 2012 Equity Funding. In exchange for his investment he received 200,000 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire an additional 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.35 per share. The warrant is currently exercisable and expires six years from the date of issuance.
In December of 2012, and January 2013, Donald A. Harris, a Broadcast director, loaned a total of $300,000 to Broadcast pursuant to a written securities purchase agreement and promissory note. The notes bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum and are due and payable on October 31, 2013. The notes are convertible to common stock at the rate of $.25 per share. In addition, Mr. Harris received a warrant to acquire an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.25 per share. The warrant is currently exercisable and expires six years after the date of issuance.
On February 21, 2013, Broadcast issued restricted stock units that may be settled by the issuance of 200,000 shares of its common stock to each of three of its directors and 86,667 shares to one of its directors for a total of 686,667 shares in consideration of unpaid director fees, which aggregated $51,500, or $0.075 per share.
In April 2013, Broadcast entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with Mr. Harris pursuant to which he agreed to purchase $750,000 of Broadcast’s accounts receivable generated over the next succeeding three months. The $750,000 was discounted by $45,000 and Broadcast received net proceeds from the accounts receivable purchase agreement of $705,000.
In June 2013, Broadcast issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $20,000 to Mr. Frenkel in satisfaction of a portion of the interest owned to Mr. Frenkel for the last quarter. The note is due on December 31, 2013 and bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
On August 8, 2013, Broadcast entered into a consent to convert account receivable agreement with Mr. Harris whereby he agreed to accept a senior secured convertible promissory note in a principal amount of $750,000 in full satisfaction of Broadcast’s obligations to him under the accounts receivable purchase agreement. The note bears interest of 12% per annum, is due October 31, 2013 and is convertible into shares of its common stock at a rate of $0.25 per share at the option of the holder.
On August 26, 2013, AllDigital sold and issued, and Broadcast countersigned, a combined convertible note to Mr. Harris in a principal amount of $750,000. Such combined convertible note bears interest at a rate of 9% per annum from and after December 1, 2013, is due on August 1, 2014 and, if the merger closes prior to November 30, 2013, automatically converts into shares of Broadcast common stock at a price equal to the lesser of (a) the lowest price per share at which Broadcast common stock is sold in an offering of capital stock for cash by Broadcast that closes, or in which firm commitments are received, on or about the closing date of the merger, and (b) the quotient of (i) $15,000,000 divided by (ii) the number of shares of Broadcast common stock issued and outstanding following the closing of the merger (assuming the exercise or conversion of all options or warrants to purchase, and all instruments convertible into, Broadcast common stock, other than the combined convertible notes and related agreements). Upon the earlier to occur of (a) November 30, 2013, if the merger has not closed, or (b) the termination of the merger agreement (such earlier date, the “merger termination date”, such combined convertible note will automatically convert into shares of common stock of AllDigital at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) the lowest price per share at which AllDigital common stock is sold in an offering of capital stock for cash by AllDigital that closes, or in which firm commitments are received, after the date of the combined convertible note and prior to the merger termination date, and (ii) the quotient of (A) $6,750,000 divided by (B) the number of shares of AllDigital common stock issued and outstanding on the merger termination date (assuming the exercise or conversion of all options or warrants to purchase, and all instruments convertible into, AllDigital, other than the combined convertible notes and agreements on substantially similar terms).
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS — ALLDIGITAL
Other than the employment and director compensation relationships discussed in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION —ALLDIGITAL above and the transactions described below, there have been no material transactions between AllDigital and any executive officer, director, 5% stockholder or immediate family member of the same during the period commencing on January 1, 2012, through the date of this prospectus, and none are contemplated as of the date of this prospectus.
As of the date of this prospectus, AllDigital owes Mr. Summers a total of $45,324 in deferred compensation related to 2009, 2010, and 2011.
On June 28, 2013, AllDigital entered into an Escrow and Contribution Agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) with Steve Smith, a director and its Vice President of Network Services, Tim Napoleon, a director and its Chief Strategist, and Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, P.C., acting as escrow agent. Pursuant to the Escrow Agreement, each of Steve Smith and Tim Napoleon have deposited with the escrow agent certificates representing 600,000 shares of AllDigital common stock, together with stock powers in favor of AllDigital. At or about the same time as the Escrow Agreement was signed, AllDigital agreed to grant incentive stock options to each of John Walpuck, its Chief Financial Officer, and Konstantin Wilms, its Chief Architect, for the purchase of 600,000 shares of AllDigital common stock during a ten-year term at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the AllDigital common stock on July 8, 2013. These options vest over 30 months, with one-third becoming exercisable every ten months after the grant date. As the options vest, the escrow agent is authorized under the Escrow Agreement to transfer an equivalent number of shares to AllDigital, pro rata from the shares contributed by Smith and Napoleon. If the holders of the options leave AllDigital before the options vest, any shares remaining with the escrow agent are to be returned to Smith and Napoleon, with each receiving 50%. The intent of the transaction is to provide additional incentives to John Walpuck and Konstantin Wilms without diluting the other stockholders of AllDigital.
On August 26, 2013, AllDigital sold and issued, and Broadcast countersigned, a combined convertible note to Mr. Smith in a principal amount of $50,000. Such combined convertible note bears interest at a rate of 9% per annum from and after December 1, 2013, is due on August 1, 2014 and, if the merger closes prior to November 30, 2013, automatically converts into shares of Broadcast common stock at a price equal to the lesser of (a) the lowest price per share at which Broadcast common stock is sold in an offering of capital stock for cash by Broadcast that closes, or in which firm commitments are received, on or about the closing date of the merger, and (b) the quotient of (i) $15,000,000 divided by (ii) the number of shares of Broadcast common stock issued and outstanding following the closing of the merger (assuming the exercise or conversion of all options or warrants to purchase, and all instruments convertible into, Broadcast common stock, other than the combined convertible notes and related agreements). Upon the earlier to occur of (a) November 30, 2013, if the merger has not closed, or (b) the termination of the merger agreement (such earlier date, the “merger termination date”, such combined convertible note will automatically convert into shares of common stock of AllDigital at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) the lowest price per share at which AllDigital common stock is sold in an offering of capital stock for cash by AllDigital that closes, or in which firm commitments are received, after the date of the combined convertible note and prior to the merger termination date, and (ii) the quotient of (A) $6,750,000 divided by (B) the number of shares of AllDigital common stock issued and outstanding on the merger termination date (assuming the exercise or conversion of all options or warrants to purchase, and all instruments convertible into, AllDigital, other than the combined convertible notes and agreements on substantially similar terms).
On July 27, 2012, CTC Resources Inc. dba U.S. Media Capital (“CTC”) filed a lawsuit in the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake City, State of Utah against ACC Capital Corporation (“ACC”), Loni L. Lowder and Broadcast (the “CTCD Lawsuit”) asserting claims for relief for breach of contract against ACC, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud against ACC and Mr. Lowder and civil conspiracy against ACC, Mr. Lowder and Broadcast, and seeking injunctive relief and constructive trust as to all defendants as well as money damages. This matter was settled and dismissed with prejudice on June 13, 2013 in exchange for Broadcast’s payment of $370,000, all of which had previously been deposited in escrow with the Court.
Broadcast was a judgment debtor in a lawsuit seeking payment for goods supplied to Broadcast, the total amount in dispute for which was approximately $130,000. The judgment was settled in April 2013 for the payment of $25,000.
In April 2013, Broadcast was named as defendant in a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior court seeking payment for services rendered by the Plaintiff, Audio Visual Plus, Inc. The total amount in dispute is approximately $29,235. An answer was filed in the lawsuit and Broadcast has paid $14,617 to the Plaintiff to stay the proceedings until Broadcast has the funds to satisfy the debt.
In May 2013, Broadcast was named as defendant in a lawsuit filed in the Small Claims Court in the Third Judicial District, State of Utah, seeking payment for services rendered by the Plaintiff, Performance Audio. The total amount in dispute for which is approximately $9,663. Broadcast is attempting to negotiate with the plaintiff.
DESCRIPTION OF BROADCAST CAPITAL STOCK
Broadcast’s authorized capital stock presently consists of 180,000,000 shares of Broadcast common stock, par value $0.05 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value. Upon the filing of the Broadcast amended and restated articles prior to the merger, the number of authorized shares of Broadcast common stock will be 120,000,000 shares, no par value (on a post-reverse-stock-split basis), and the number of shares of Broadcast preferred stock will be 20,000,000 shares, no par value (on a post-reverse-stock-split basis). As of August 15, 2013, Broadcast had 110,233,225 shares of common stock outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. The following is a summary of the terms of Broadcast’s capital stock, which terms will not change as a result of the filing of the Broadcast amended and restated articles in connection with the merger except as set forth in the second sentence of this paragraph.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. Accordingly, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all of the directors standing for election. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends, as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefor, subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock. Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Broadcast, the holders of common stock, subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, are entitled to receive ratably Broadcast’s net assets available after the payment of its debts and other liabilities. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Broadcast’s board of directors has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the designations, powers, preferences, privileges and relative participating, option, or special rights and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of those series, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. The board of directors, without shareholder approval, can issue preferred stock with voting, conversion or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of common stock. Preferred stock could thus be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of management more difficult. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of decreasing the market price of Broadcast common stock and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of Broadcast common stock. No shares of preferred stock are outstanding.
Unsecured Convertible Note
On November 2, 2006, Broadcast closed on a convertible note securities agreement, dated October 28, 2006, and issued to the convertible note holder thereunder an unsecured convertible note in the principal amount of $1,000,000 representing the funding received by Broadcast from an affiliate of the convertible note holder on September 29, 2006. In connection with the 2010 Debt Restructuring, Broadcast amended this $1.0 million unsecured convertible note, pursuant to which the maturity date of the note was extended to December 31, 2013. The unsecured convertible note is convertible into shares of Broadcast common stock at a conversion price of $.25 per share, convertible any time during the term of the note, and is subject to standard anti-dilution rights. Broadcast anticipates that this note will be terminated in exchange for shares of Broadcast common stock in the exchange offer.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –Broadcast – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Secured Convertible Notes
Beginning on July 13, 2012, Broadcast issued secured convertible notes pursuant to a Note and Warrant Purchase and Security Agreement and referred to herein as the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering. Up to $5,000,000 in secured convertible notes may be issued and as of June 30, 2013, secured convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $3,475,000 had been issued. The secured convertible notes issued in the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering are due October 31, 2013, are secured by all of Broadcast’s assets other than equipment and receivables secured by Broadcast’s equipment lessor and are convertible into shares of Broadcast common stock at a conversion price of $0.25 per share, convertible any time during the term of the such notes.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Broadcast – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2013, information regarding Broadcast’s equity compensation plans under which shares of common stock are authorized for issuance.
| |
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
outstanding securities)
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders(1)
|
3,368,247
|
$0.92
|
88,200
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders (2)
|
1,422,033
|
$1.45
|
4,290,578
|
|
Total
|
4,790,280
|
$1.06
|
4,378,778
|
|
(1)
|
Broadcast’s 2008 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units to Broadcast employees, directors and consultants. The plan covers a total of 4,000,000 shares of Broadcast common stock. As of June 30, 2013, restricted stock units covering 285,000 units had been settled through the issuance of common stock and 3,368,247 were outstanding. The plan is administered by Broadcast’s board of directors or compensation committee of the board. Awards may be vested on such schedules determined by the plan administrator. Broadcast anticipates that a significant number of the options outstanding under the 2008 Plan will be terminated in exchange for shares of Broadcast common stock in the exchange offer.
|
|
(2)
|
Broadcast’s long-term incentive plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock to Broadcast employees, directors and consultants. The plan covers a total of 6,000,000 shares of Broadcast common stock. As of June 30, 2013, options to purchase 287,389 shares of common stock had been exercised. All awards must be granted at fair market value on the date of grant. The plan is administered by Broadcast’s board of directors or compensation committee of the board. Awards may be vested on such schedules determined by the plan administrator. Broadcast anticipates that a significant number of the options outstanding under the long-term incentive plan will be terminated in exchange for shares of Broadcast common stock in the exchange offer.
|
Broadcast has previously issued additional warrants in several private transactions. Under the terms of these warrants, as of June 30, 2013, an aggregate of 41,674,936 shares of Broadcast common stock may be purchased at exercise prices ranging from $0.25 to 1.18 per share. The warrants may be exercised any time prior to their expiration dates which range from December 2014 to April 2018. Broadcast anticipates that a significant number of these warrants will be terminated in exchange for shares of Broadcast common stock in the exchange offer.
Control Shares Act
Broadcast is subject to the Control Shares Act, and consequently, certain holders of Broadcast’s capital stock may be subject to the voting and/or other limitations set forth in the Control Shares Act. For further information on the Control Shares Act, see “Description of Common Stock – Anti-Takeover Statutes” above.
INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Broadcast’s articles of incorporation as currently in effect and the proposed Broadcast amended and restated articles provide for limitation of liability of Broadcast’s directors and for indemnification of Broadcast’s directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Utah law. Broadcast’s directors and officers may be liable for a breach or failure to perform their duties in accordance with Utah law only if their breach or failure to perform constitutes gross negligence, willful misconduct or intentional harm on Broadcast or its shareholders. Broadcast’s directors may not be personally liable for monetary damages for action taken or failure to take action as a director except in specific instances established by Utah law.
In accordance with Utah law, Broadcast may generally indemnify a director or officer against liability incurred in a proceeding if he or she acted in good faith, and believed that his or her conduct was in Broadcast’s best interest and that he or she had no reason to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Broadcast may not indemnify a director or officer if the person was adjudged liable to it or in the event it is adjudicated that the director or officer received an improper personal benefit.
Under Utah law, Broadcast is required to indemnify a director or officer who is successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any proceeding, or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter in the proceeding, to which he or she was a party because he or she is or was a director or an officer, as the case may be, against reasonable expenses incurred by him or her in connection with the proceeding or claim with respect to which he or she has been successful.
Broadcast maintains a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy which, subject to the limitations and exclusions stated therein, covers its directors and officers for certain actions or inactions they may take or omit to take in their capacities as directors and officers.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of Broadcast pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, Broadcast has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by a registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, Broadcast will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
HJ & Associates, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited Broadcast’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, as set forth in their report dated March 29, 2013, which is included in this prospectus. Broadcast’s financial statements are included herein in reliance on HJ & Associates, LLC and its respective report, given its authority as an expert in accounting and auditing matters.
Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited AllDigital’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, as set forth in their report dated March 28, 2013, which is included in this prospectus. AllDigital’s financial statements are included herein in reliance on Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP and its respective report, given its authority as an expert in accounting and auditing matters.
The validity of the securities offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for Broadcast by Reed L. Benson, Esq., Salt Lake City, Utah.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Broadcast Financial Statements
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
BF-2
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
|
BF-3
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011
|
BF-4
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended
December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
BF-5
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012
and December 31, 2011
|
BF-6
|
| |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
BF-7
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013
|
BF-32
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements for Operations for the three and six months
ending June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013
|
BF-33
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ending June 30, 2012
and June 30, 2013
|
BF-34
|
| |
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
BF-35
|
AllDigital Financial Statements
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
AF-2
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
|
AF-3
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011
|
AF-4
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012
and December 31, 2011
|
AF-5
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
AF-7
|
| |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
AF-8
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013
|
AF-19
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements for Operations for the three and six months
ending June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013
|
AF-20
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ending June 30, 2012
and June 30, 2013
|
AF-21
|
| |
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
AF-22
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Broadcast International, Inc.
Salt Lake City, Utah
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Broadcast International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Broadcast International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ HJ & Associates, LLC
HJ & Associates, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 29, 2013
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
DEC 31, 2011
|
|
|
DEC 31, 2012
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
961,265 |
|
|
$ |
394,342 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
140,700 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,239,903 |
|
|
|
821,608 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
60,851 |
|
|
|
306,296 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
203,973 |
|
|
|
90,067 |
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,465,992 |
|
|
|
1,753,013 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,417,134 |
|
|
|
572,107 |
|
|
Other Assets, non current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt offering costs
|
|
|
123,278 |
|
|
|
42,176 |
|
|
Patents, net
|
|
|
131,079 |
|
|
|
120,928 |
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
406,004 |
|
|
|
196,292 |
|
|
Total other assets, non current
|
|
|
660,361 |
|
|
|
359,396 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,543,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,684,516 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
1,252,538 |
|
|
$ |
2,293,470 |
|
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
|
|
390,206 |
|
|
|
363,568 |
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
175,008 |
|
|
|
299,728 |
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
10,449 |
|
|
|
51,335 |
|
|
Current portion of notes payable (net of discount of $103,859 and
$947,994, respectively)
|
|
|
2,068,016 |
|
|
|
3,102,006 |
|
|
Other current obligations
|
|
|
1,067,649 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Derivative valuation
|
|
|
3,760,200 |
|
|
|
1,191,269 |
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,724,066 |
|
|
|
7,301,376 |
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of notes payable (net of discount of $659,496 and $0,
respectively)
|
|
|
6,349,445 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
6,349,445 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
15,073,511 |
|
|
|
7,301,376 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Common stock, $.05 par value, 180,000,000 shares authorized; 75,975,656
and 107,473,820 shares issued as of December 31, 2011 and December 31,
2012, respectively
|
|
|
3,798,783 |
|
|
|
5,373,691 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
96,859,058 |
|
|
|
99,594,490 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(111,187,865 |
) |
|
|
(109,585,041 |
) |
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(10,530,024 |
) |
|
|
(4,616,860 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
|
$ |
4,543,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,684,516 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Year Ended Dec
31, 2011
|
|
|
For the Year Ended Dec
31, 2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,446,082 |
|
|
$ |
7,523,624 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
5,868,601 |
|
|
|
4,819,624 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,577,481 |
|
|
|
2,704,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and general
|
|
|
6,172,794 |
|
|
|
4,546,612 |
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
1,277,629 |
|
|
|
1,908,763 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,410,249 |
|
|
|
1,754,163 |
|
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
685,191 |
|
|
|
558,148 |
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
10,572,043 |
|
|
|
8,767,686 |
|
|
Total operating loss
|
|
|
(7,994,562 |
) |
|
|
(6,063,686 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,327 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,000,072 |
) |
|
|
(1,542,424 |
) |
|
Gain on derivative valuation
|
|
|
11,724,400 |
|
|
|
8,829,748 |
|
|
Note conversion offering expense
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(47,348 |
) |
|
Retirement of debt offering costs
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(53,150 |
) |
|
Debt conversion costs
|
|
|
(476,234 |
) |
|
|
(1,095,309 |
) |
|
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(954,017 |
) |
|
|
1,578,914 |
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
(4,433 |
) |
|
Total other income
|
|
|
9,299,008 |
|
|
|
7,666,510 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,304,446 |
|
|
|
1,602,824 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,304,446 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,824 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
Income per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
75,416,916 |
|
|
|
100,798,223 |
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
78,098,166 |
|
|
|
106,533,844 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
| |
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
| |
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
74,078,153 |
|
|
$ |
3,703,908 |
|
|
$ |
92,867,561 |
|
|
$ |
(112,492,311 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,920,842 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued on debt conversion, net of
costs
|
|
|
1,307,153 |
|
|
|
65,357 |
|
|
|
1,230,790 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,296,147 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for interest
|
|
|
135,369 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
74,453 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
81,221 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for option exercises
|
|
|
55,098 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
18,304 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for warrant exercises
|
|
|
372,272 |
|
|
|
18,614 |
|
|
|
241,386 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in exchange for IDI shares
|
|
|
27,611 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,760 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity issued for interest
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
157,400 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
157,400 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,262,540 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,262,540 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,304,446 |
|
|
|
1,304,446 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2011
|
|
|
75,975,656 |
|
|
$ |
3,798,783 |
|
|
$ |
96,859,058 |
|
|
$ |
(111,187,865 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,530,024 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for 2012 equity financing
and debt restructuring, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
25,402,164 |
|
|
|
1,270,108 |
|
|
|
837,726 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,107,834 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued on debt conversion
|
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
1,380,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,660,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services rendered
|
|
|
496,000 |
|
|
|
24,800 |
|
|
|
152,513 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
177,313 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and restated 6.25% note conversion
feature
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
81,500 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
81,500 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
283,693 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
283,693 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,602,824 |
|
|
|
1,602,824 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2012
|
|
|
107,473,820 |
|
|
$ |
5,373,691 |
|
|
$ |
99,594,490 |
|
|
$ |
(109,585,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,616,860 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| |
|
For the Year
Ended Dec 31,
2011
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended Dec 31,
2012
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
1,304,446 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,824 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,483,868 |
|
|
|
1,024,754 |
|
|
Common stock issued for services
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
177,313 |
|
|
Common stock issued for interest
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Common stock issued for in process research and development
|
|
|
10,760 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Accretion of discount on convertible notes payable
|
|
|
340,377 |
|
|
|
941,225 |
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
2,262,540 |
|
|
|
283,693 |
|
|
Warrants issued for interest
|
|
|
157,400 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Warrants issued for debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
404,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Warrants issued and expensed for issuance costs
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,095,309 |
|
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
954,017 |
|
|
|
(1,578,914 |
) |
|
Expensed note conversion costs
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
47,348 |
|
|
Gain on derivative liability valuation
|
|
|
(11,724,400 |
) |
|
|
(8,829,748 |
) |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
Retirement of debt offering costs
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
53,150 |
|
|
Loss on impairment of assets
|
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
10,149 |
|
|
|
31,982 |
|
|
Changes in assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(124,997 |
) |
|
|
386,313 |
|
|
Increase in inventories
|
|
|
(8,676 |
) |
|
|
(245,445 |
) |
|
Decrease (increase) in debt offering costs
|
|
|
(102,978 |
) |
|
|
105,805 |
|
|
Decrease in prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
205,498 |
|
|
|
323,618 |
|
|
Changes in liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
(267,452 |
) |
|
|
1,040,932 |
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,823 |
|
|
|
136,682 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues
|
|
|
(128,988 |
) |
|
|
40,886 |
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(5,164,437 |
) |
|
|
(3,362,785 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment
|
|
|
(472,505 |
) |
|
|
(172,825 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
3,761 |
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(471,322 |
) |
|
|
(169,064 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants
|
|
|
18,304 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Proceeds from equity financing
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,150,000 |
|
|
Payments on principal on debt
|
|
|
(1,526,834 |
) |
|
|
(4,017,649 |
) |
|
Equity issuance costs
|
|
|
(24,078 |
) |
|
|
(776,483 |
) |
|
Proceeds from equipment financing
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Payments for debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(275,041 |
) |
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(140,700 |
) |
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
2,024,799 |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
467,392 |
|
|
|
2,964,926 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,168,367 |
) |
|
|
(566,923 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
6,129,632 |
|
|
|
961,265 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
961,265 |
|
|
$ |
394,342 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
357,246 |
|
|
$ |
347,902 |
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation
Broadcast International, Inc. (the Company) is the consolidated parent company of BI Acquisitions, Inc. (BI), a wholly-owned subsidiary, and Interact Devices, Inc. (IDI), a 94% owned subsidiary.
BI was incorporated in Utah in December 1999 and began operations in January 2000. It is a communications services and technology company headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. The Company operates two divisions – BI Networks and CodecSys.
On October 1, 2003, the Company (formerly known as Laser Corporation) acquired BI by issuing shares of its common stock representing 98% of the total equity ownership in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding BI common stock. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, or recapitalization of BI, with BI being treated as the accounting acquirer. Effective January 13, 2004, the company changed its name from Laser Corporation to Broadcast International, Inc.
On May 18, 2004, the Debtor-in-Possession’s Plan of Reorganization for IDI was confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court. As a result of this confirmation and subsequent share acquisitions, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company owned, on a fully diluted basis, approximately 55,897,169 common share equivalents of IDI, representing approximately 94% of the equity of IDI.
The audited consolidated financial statements herein include operations from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. IDI produced losses from operations during the period; therefore, 100% of the results from operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated statements.
Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all cash on hand and in banks, and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had bank balances of $38,847 and $909,182, respectively in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In addition we have restricted cash of $140,700, which represents a deposit to the Utah District Court, which is held pending the outcome of our litigation with our equipment lessor. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Current financial market conditions have had the effect of restricting liquidity of cash management investments and have increased the risk of even the most liquid investments and the viability of some financial institutions. We do not believe, however, that these conditions will materially affect our business or our ability to meet our obligations or pursue our business plans.
Account Receivables
Trade account receivables are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received.
A trade receivable is considered to be past due if any portion of the receivable balance is outstanding for more than 90 days. After the receivable becomes past due, it is on non-accrual status and accrual of interest is suspended.
Inventories
Inventories consisting of electrical and computer parts are stated at the lower of cost or market determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the property, generally from three to five years. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred except when such repairs significantly add to the useful life or productive capacity of the asset, in which case the repairs are capitalized.
Patents and Intangibles
Patents represent initial legal costs incurred to apply for United States and international patents on the CodecSys technology, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of approximately 20 years. We have filed several patents in the United States and foreign countries. As of December 31, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had approved four patents. Additionally, eleven foreign countries had approved patent rights. While we are unsure whether we can develop the technology in order to obtain the full benefits, the patents themselves hold value and could be sold to companies with more resources to complete the development. On-going legal expenses incurred for patent follow-up have been expensed from July 2005 forward. For the year ended December 31, 2011 we recorded a $26,180 valuation impairment related to two patent applications for areas outside the United States.
Amortization expense recognized on all patents totaled $10,151 for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense, if all patents were issued at the beginning of 2013, for each of the next five years is as follows:
|
Year ending
December 31:
|
|
|
2013
|
$11,343
|
|
2014
|
10,121
|
|
2015
|
10,121
|
|
2016
|
10,121
|
|
2017
|
10,121
|
Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets, including patents, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future un-discounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, then the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Fair value is determined by using cash flow analyses and other market valuations. After our review at December 31, 2012 it was determined that no adjustment was required.
Stock-based Compensation
In accordance with ASC Topic 718, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the awards, and recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award for awards expected to vest.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes prescribed by ASC Topic 740. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when evidence exists that there is an arrangement between us and our customers, delivery of equipment sold or service has occurred, the selling price to our customers is fixed and determinable with required documentation, and collectability is reasonably assured. We recognize as deferred revenue, payments made in advance by customers for services not yet provided.
When we enter into a multi-year contract with a customer to provide installation, network management, and satellite transponder and help desk, or combination of these services, we recognize this revenue as services are performed and as equipment is sold. These agreements typically provide for additional fees, as needed, to be charged if on-site visits are required by the customer in order to ensure that each customer location is able to receive network communication. As these on-site visits are performed the associated revenue and cost are recognized in the period the work is completed. If we install, for an additional fee, new or replacement equipment to an immaterial number of new customer locations, and the equipment immediately becomes the property of the customer, the associated revenue and cost are recorded in the period in which the work is completed.
In instances where we have entered into license agreements with a third parties to use our technology within their product offering, we recognize any base or prepaid revenues over the term of the agreement and any per occurrence or periodic usage revenues in the period they are earned.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. We expensed $1,754,163 and $2,410,249 of research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable. In the normal course of business, we provide credit terms to our customers. Accordingly, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain allowances for possible losses which, when realized, have been within the range of management’s expectations.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had the same customer that individually constituted 85% and 89%, of our total revenues, respectively. Although the initial contract for this customer has expired, we received a contract extension through May 31, 2013 to continue to provide services. Unless we can replace that customer with another similarly large customer or customers, revenues will decline substantially, which will harm our business.
Weighted Average Shares
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, plus the dilutive common stock equivalents that would rise from the exercise of stock options, warrants and restricted stock units outstanding during the period, using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the period, plus the effect of assuming conversion of the convertible debt. The computation of diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion or exercise of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012:
| |
|
For the Year
Ended 2011
|
|
|
For the year
Ended 2012
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,304,446 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,824 |
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
75,416,916 |
|
|
|
100,798,223 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and warrants
|
|
|
131,250 |
|
|
|
2,510,488 |
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
|
3,225,133 |
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
78,098,166 |
|
|
|
106,533,844 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Potentially dilutive securities representing 18,568,963 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2012, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Potentially dilutive securities representing 24,597,134 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2011, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Advertising Expenses
We follow the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $35,168 and $68,703, respectively.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU No 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections. This Update makes changes to several of the SEC guidance literature sections within the Codification. The main focus is to update the SEC guidance as per SAB 114 to reference the codification sections rather than the old standards prior to the codification. The changes were mainly references and were not intended to change guidance. The amendments in this Update are effective immediately. This guidance didn’t have a significant impact on the Company’s financials since it was an update of SEC referenced guidance and didn’t change existing guidance.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The objective of this Update is to simplify how entities test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment and to have the testing be in-line with the updated guidance issued in 2011 related to impairment testing for goodwill. This Update allows entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative analysis. The more likely than not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50%. The option to first assess qualitative factors can be bypassed and an entity can proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test and still be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in subsequent years. Some examples of circumstances to consider are 1) cost factors that have a negative impact on earnings, 2) financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows, 3) legal, regulatory, contractual, political or business conditions, 4) other relevant entity specific events 5) industry and market conditions, and 6) macroeconomic conditions. The Update is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012 if the financial statements have not been issued. The Company doesn’t expect this Update to impact the Company’s financials since it currently has no indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill, but the Company will plan on utilizing the qualitative assessment options if any are acquired.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This Update eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity in order to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income items and to facilitate convergence with IFRS. The Update requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements (a statement of income and statement of other comprehensive income). Additionally, adjustments for items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be presented on the face of the financial statements. This Update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the Update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the Update is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. This impacts how items for Other Comprehensive Income are presented and the Company will follow the guidance starting in Q1 2012.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This Update is applicable to all entities that have financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either 1) offset in accordance with current guidance or 2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. The Update requires an entity with these types of instruments to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements. Both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities is required to be disclosed. This Update is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company doesn’t expect this Update to impact the Company’s financials since it does not currently have any financial instruments or derivative instruments that are offset.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)- Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The objective of this Update is to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment. This Update now allows entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step process of (1) comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value and (2) test to measure the amount of the impairment loss if the fair value is less than the carrying value. The more likely than not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50%. The option to first assess qualitative factors can be bypassed and an entity can proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. Some examples of circumstances to consider are 1) macroeconomic conditions, 2) industry and market conditions, 3) cost factors that have a negative impact on earnings, 4) overall financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows 5) other relevant entity specific events and 6) sustained decrease in stock price. The Update is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011 if the financial statements have not been issued. If necessary, the Company will evaluate whether or not it will utilize the qualitative assessment option prior to performing the first goodwill impairment test in 2012, typically done during the 4th quarter.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRSs. The Amendments in this Update will improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP and IFRSs. The Boards of both organizations worked together to ensure fair value has the same meaning and the measurement and disclosures would be the same other than minor differences in wording. The Amendments explain how to measure fair value and do not require any additional fair value measurements. A couple of the more significant changes are 1) Clarification that quantitative information about unobservable inputs categorized as Level 3 should be disclosed, 2) Specifies that premiums and discounts should be applied in the absence of Level 1 input if market participants would do so, but that premiums or discounts related to size/quantity should not be considered, 3) Additional disclosure requirements for fair value measurements categorized as Level 3, an entity’s us of a nonfinancial asset in a way that differs from the asset’s highest and best use and the categorization by level for items not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, but for which fair value disclosure is required. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively. The Update is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company doesn’t expect this guidance to have a significant impact on its financials since the amount of items disclosed at fair value is minimal, but will ensure the guidance is followed for items disclosed at fair value.
Note 3 – Accounts Receivable
Included in our $821,608 and $1,239,903 net accounts receivable for the years ending December 2012 and 2011, respectively, were (i) $856,462 and $1,269,579 for billed trade receivables, respectively; (ii) $44,478 and $23,814 of unbilled trade receivables, respectively; (iii) $1,808 and $0 for employee travel advances and other receivables, respectively; less (iv) $81,140 and $53,490 for allowance for uncollectible accounts, respectively.
Included in the numbers above is our single largest customer for each year ended December 31, 2012 and, 2011, which provided 85% and 89% of total revenue and represented 71% and 79% of our trade receivables on December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Our largest customer initially signed a three-year agreement which has now expired, although we did receive a contract extension through May 31, 2013 to continue to provide services. Unless we can replace that customer with another similarly large customer or customers, revenues will decline substantially, which will harm our business.
Note 4 – Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring
2012 Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring
On March 26, 2012, we closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of our outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”) resulting in complete satisfaction of our senior indebtedness.
We entered into an Engagement Agreement, dated October 28, 2011, with MDB Capital Group, LLC (“MDB”), pursuant to which MDB agreed to act as the exclusive agent of the Company on a “best efforts” basis with respect to the sale of up to a maximum gross consideration of $6,000,000, subsequently verbally increased to $10,000,000, of the Company’s securities, subject to a minimum gross consideration of $3,000,000. The Company agreed to pay to MDB a commission of 10% of the gross offering proceeds received by the Company, to grant to MDB warrants to acquire up to 10% of the shares of our common stock and warrants issued in the financing, and to pay the reasonable costs and expenses of MDB related to the offering.
Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) dated March 23, 2012 with select institutional and other accredited investors for the private placement of 27,800,000 units of our securities. The SPA included a purchase price of $0.25 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and two forms of Warrant: (1) The “A” Warrant grants the investors the right to purchase an additional share of common stock for each two shares of common stock purchased, for a term of six years and at an exercise price of $0.35 per share; and (2) The “B” Warrant will not be exercisable unless and until the occurrence of a future issuance of stock at less than $0.25 per share, but, in the event of such issuance, grants the investors the right to acquire additional shares at a price of $0.05 to reduce the impact of the dilution caused by such issuance, but in no event shall the number of shares to be issued under the B Warrant cause us to exceed the number of authorized shares of common stock. The shares in excess of our authorized shares that would have been issuable under the B Warrant shall be “net settled” by payment of cash in an amount equal to the number of shares in excess of the authorized common shares multiplied by the closing price of our common stock as of the trading day immediately prior to the applicable date of the exercise of such B Warrant. The holders of the B Warrants agreed in December 2012 to amend the terms of the B Warrant to reduce the amount of subsequent financing required to extinguish the B Warrants with the result that the B Warrants have now been extinguished.
Net proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing, after deducting the commissions and the estimated legal, printing and other costs and expenses related to the financing, were approximately $6.1 million. Coincident to the closing of the 2012 Equity Financing, we also closed on the 2012 Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, the Company paid $2,750,000 to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), and issued to Castlerigg 2,000,000 shares of common stock in full and complete satisfaction of the senior convertible note and all accrued interest. In consideration of negotiating the 2012 Debt Restructuring, we issued to one of our placement agents 586,164 shares of our common stock and paid them $275,041.
In December 2011, we entered into a loan with 7 accredited individuals and entities under the terms of which we borrowed $1,300,000 to be used as working capital (“Bridge Loan”). The Bridge Loan bears an interest rate of 18% per annum and had a maturity date of February 28, 2012, which was subsequently extended to the earlier of the date nine months from the original maturity date or the date we close on an additional sale of our securities that results in gross proceeds to us of $12 million. In consideration of the Bridge Loan we granted to the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a five year term to purchase 357,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share. In consideration of the extension of the maturity date of the Bridge Loan, we granted the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a six year term to purchase 247,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share.
In connection with the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the SPA, two of the above described bridge lenders converted the principal balance of their portion of the bridge loan in the amount of $400,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing. In addition, one other entity converted the amount owed by us for equipment purchases in the amount of $500,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing. The proceeds from these conversions were treated as funds raised with respect to the financing.
In connection with the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the SPA, the Company agreed to prepare and file, within 60 days following the issuance of the securities, a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock sold in the financing and the shares of common stock underlying the Warrants. The Company filed the registration statement on April 9, 2012 and it was declared effective on August 1, 2012.
On April 5, 2012 we secured an additional $154,000 from 1 company and 4 individuals (three of which are members of our Board of Directors) on the same terms and conditions as the investors of the 2012 Equity Financing. As a result of this funding we issued 616,000 shares of our common stock and A warrants totaling 400,400 of which 308,000 were issued to investors and 92,400 were issued to our investment banker.
All warrants listed below were issued with price protection provisions and were accounted for as derivative liabilities. The A Warrants were valued using the Black Scholes pricing model and the B Warrants were valued using the Geometric Brownian Motion methodology with a risk neutral Monte Carlo approach.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Common
Shares
Issued
|
|
|
Number of
A Warrants
|
|
|
Value of A
Warrants
|
|
|
Value of
B
Warrants
|
|
|
Total
Warrant
Value
|
|
|
Investors
|
|
|
24,816,000 |
|
|
|
12,408,000 |
|
|
$ |
469,464 |
|
|
$ |
39,387 |
|
|
$ |
508,851 |
|
|
Bridge Loan Conversion
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
30,268 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
32,807 |
|
|
Equipment Finance Conversion
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
37,836 |
|
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
41,010 |
|
|
Agency
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,262,400 |
|
|
|
161,270 |
|
|
|
13,531 |
|
|
|
174,801 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,416,000 |
|
|
|
18,470,400 |
|
|
$ |
698,838 |
|
|
$ |
58,631 |
|
|
$ |
757,469 |
|
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $757,469 as of December 31, 2012, related to the reset feature of the A warrants and the B warrants mentioned above. A derivative valuation gain of $4,365,323 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability from the time the warrants issued. The aggregate derivative liability of $757,469 was calculated as follows: (1) $698,838 for the reset feature of the A warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.72%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 5.2; (iii) expected volatility of 85.49%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08 and (2) $58,631 for the B warrants using the Geometric Brownian Motion methodology with a risk neutral Monte Carlo approach.
2010 Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring
On December 24, 2010, we closed on an equity financing (the “Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of our then outstanding convertible indebtedness (the “Debt Restructuring”). The Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring are described as follows.
We entered into a Placement Agency Agreement, dated December 17, 2010, with Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation (“PBC”), pursuant to which PBC agreed to act as the exclusive agent of the Company on a “best efforts” basis with respect to the sale of up to a maximum gross consideration of $15,000,000 of units of the Company’s securities, subject to a minimum gross consideration of $10,000,000. The units consisted of two shares of our common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of our common stock. The Company agreed to pay PBC a commission of 8% of the gross offering proceeds received by the Company, to issue PBC 40,000 shares of its common stock for each $1,000,000 raised, and to pay the reasonable costs and expenses of PBC related to the offering. The Company also agreed to pay PBC a restructuring fee in the amount of approximately $180,000 upon the closing of the Equity Financing and the simultaneous Debt Restructuring.
Pursuant to the Placement Agency Agreement, we entered into Subscription Agreements dated December 23, 2010 with select institutional and other accredited investors for the private placement of 12,500,000 units of our securities. The Subscription Agreements included a purchase price of $1.20 per unit, with each unit consisting of two shares of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock. The warrants have a term of five years and had an exercise price of $1.00 per share which was reset to $0.78 pursuant to the 2012 Equity Financing.
Net proceeds from the Equity Financing, after deducting the commissions and debt restructuring fees payable to PBC and the estimated legal, printing and other costs and expenses related to the financing, were approximately $13.5 million. We used a portion of the net proceeds of the Equity Financing to pay down debt and the remainder was used for working capital.
On November 29, 2010, we entered into a bridge loan transaction with three accredited investors pursuant to which we issued unsecured notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0 million. Upon the closing of the Equity Financing, the lenders converted the entire principal amount plus accrued interest into the same units offered in the Equity Financing and the proceeds from the bridge loan transaction were treated as funds raised with respect to the financing.
In connection with the Equity Financing and under the terms of the Subscription Agreements, the Company agreed to prepare and file, and did file, within 60 days following the issuance of the securities, a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock sold in the financing and the shares of common stock underlying the warrants. The registration statement was declared effective June 16, 2011 satisfying the obligation contained in the Subscription Agreements.
On December 24, 2010, we also closed on the Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, we (i) issued an Amended and Restated Senior Convertible Note in the principal amount of $5.5 million (the “Amended and Restated Note”) to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), (ii) paid $2.5 million in cash to Castlerigg, (iii) cancelled warrants previously issued to Castlerigg that were exercisable for a total of 5,208,333 shares of common stock, (iv) issued 800,000 shares of common stock to Castlerigg in satisfaction of an obligation under a prior loan amendment, (v) entered into the Letter Agreement pursuant to which we paid Castlerigg an additional $2.75 million in cash in lieu of the issuance of $3.5 million in stock and warrants as provided in the loan restructuring agreement under which the Amended and Restated Note and other documents were issued (the “Loan Restructuring Agreement”), and (vi) entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with Castlerigg dated December 23, 2010. As a result of the foregoing, Castlerigg forgave approximately $7.2 million of principal and accrued but unpaid interest.
The Amended and Restated Note, dated December 23, 2010, was a senior, unsecured note that matured in three years from the closing and bore interest at an annual rate of 6.25%, payable semi-annually. We paid the first year’s interest of $350,434 at the closing. The Amended and Restated Note was convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.35 per share, subject to adjustment. The Amended and Restated Note was convertible in whole or in part at any time upon notice by Castlerigg to us. The Amended and Restated Note also contained various restrictions, acceleration provisions and other standard and customary terms and conditions. Two of our consolidated subsidiaries guaranteed our obligations under the Amended and Restated Note.
The Investor Rights Agreement provides Castlerigg with certain registration rights with respect to the Company’s securities held by Castlerigg. These registration rights include an obligation of the Company to issue additional warrants to Castlerigg if certain registration deadlines or conditions are not satisfied. The agreement also contains full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than the conversion price described above.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued Castlerigg 400,000 warrants pursuant to a waiver agreement dated March 10, 2011 allowing the issuance of shares and warrants for the conversion of the AR Note Payable without adjusting the conversion price of the Amended and Restated Senior 6.25% Convertible Note. These warrants contain full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than the conversion price described above and were accounted for as embedded derivatives and valued on the transaction date using a Black Scholes pricing model. During the three and six months ended June 30 ,2011 the warrant holder exercised these warrants using a cashless provision resulting in the company issuing 372,272 shares of our common stock. A valuation gain of $144,000 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative from the time of issue to the date of conversion.
In connection with the Debt Restructuring, the Company amended the note with the holder of a $1.0 million unsecured convertible note, pursuant to which the maturity date of the note was extended to December 31, 2013. We also issued 150,000 shares and 75,000 warrants to acquire our common stock at $.90 per share to the holder of this note as consideration to extend the term of the note.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of our outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”) resulting in complete satisfaction our senior indebtedness.
A portion of the net proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing was used to close on the 2012 Debt Restructuring therewith. The Company paid $2,750,000 and issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $760,000 to Castlerigg in satisfaction of the $5,500,000 senior convertible note and $680,816 of accrued interest.
Investor warrants totaling 12,499,980 issued under the Subscription Agreements contain price protection adjustments in the event we issue new common stock or common stock equivalents in certain transactions at a price less than $1.00 per share and were accounted for as embedded derivatives and valued on the transaction date using a Black Scholes pricing model. The exercise price has been reset to $0.7312 per share due to subsequent financings.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $109,400 and $2,785,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the reset feature of the warrants issued under the Placement agency Agreement. A derivative valuation gain of $2,765,600 and $7,875,000, respectively, were recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $109,400 for the conversion feature of the note was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.36%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 3.0; (iii) expected volatility of 85.10%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
Note 5 – Notes Payable
The recorded value of our notes payable (net of debt discount) for the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:
| |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
2012 Secured Convertible Notes
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,428,166 |
|
|
Unsecured Convertible Note
|
|
|
340,504 |
|
|
|
673,840 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Senior 6.25% Convertible Note
|
|
$ |
6,180,816 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
Bridge Loan Note Payable
|
|
|
1,196,141 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Equipment Purchase and Sale Agreement
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,417,461 |
|
|
|
3,102,006 |
|
|
Less Current Portion
|
|
|
(2,068,016 |
) |
|
|
(3,102,006 |
) |
|
Total Long-term
|
|
$ |
6,349,445 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
2012 Secured Convertible Notes
We engaged Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation to raise funds through the issuance of convertible promissory notes. We anticipated issuing promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to $5,000,000 (“2012 Convertible Debt Offering”). As of December 31, 2012 we have issued notes having an aggregate principal value of $3,050,000 as explained below. The notes are due and payable on or before July 13, 2013. The notes bear interest at 12% per annum and may convertible to common stock at a $.25 per share conversion price. We also granted holders of the notes warrants with a five year life to acquire up to 200,000 shares of our common stock for each $100,000 of principal amount of the convertible notes. The notes are secured by all of our assets with the exception of the equipment and receivables secured by the equipment lessor for equipment used in providing services for our largest customer’s digital signage network.
In July 2012, we entered into a note and warrant purchase and security agreement with individual investors and broke escrow on the initial funding under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering, the principal amount of which was $1,900,000, which included the conversion of $900,000 of previously issued short term debt (See Bridge Loan described above) to the 2012 convertible Debt Offering, which extinguished the Bridge Loan. Of the $1,000,000 non-converted principal amount, we realized $923,175 of cash in the initial closing and issued warrants to acquire 3,800,000 shares of our common stock. We paid $76,825 in investment banking fees and costs of the offering.
In August 2012, we continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering by issuing short term debt with a principal amount of $900,000, issued warrants to acquire 1,800,000 shares of our common stock, from which we realized cash of $851,624 after payment of investment banking fees of $48,376.
In December 2012, we continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering by issuing short term debt with a principal amount of $250,000, issued warrants to acquire 500,000 shares of our common stock to one member of our Board of Directors.
The notes and warrants mentioned above were issued with price protection provisions and were accounted for as derivative liabilities and valued on the dates issued using a Black-Scholes pricing model.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $74,500 as of December 31, 2012, related to the conversion feature of the note. A derivative valuation gain of $423,500 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability from the time the notes were issued. The aggregate derivative liability of $74,500 was calculated as follows using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.11%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 0.50; (iii) expected volatility of 129.08%, (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
Additionally, we recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $183,000 as of December 31, 2012, related to the warrant reset provision. A derivative valuation gain of $442,000 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability from the time the warrants were issued. The aggregate derivative liability of $183,000 was calculated as follows using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.63%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 4.50; (iii) expected volatility of 85.75%, (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
Unsecured Convertible Note
On September 29, 2006, we entered into a letter of understanding with Triage Capital Management, or Triage, dated September 25, 2006. The letter of understanding provided that Triage loan $1,000,000 to us in exchange for us entering into, on or prior to October 30, 2006, a convertible note securities agreement. It was intended that the funding provided by Triage be replaced by a convertible note and accompanying warrants, as described below. Effective November 2, 2006, we entered into securities purchase agreement, a 5% convertible note, a registration rights agreement, and four classes of warrants to purchase our common stock, all of which were with an individual note holder, the controlling owner of Triage, who caused our agreement with Triage to be assigned to him, which satisfied our agreement with Triage.
Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, (i) we sold to the convertible note holder a three-year convertible note in the principal amount of $1,000,000 representing the funding received by us on September 29, 2006; (ii) the convertible note bears an annual interest rate of 5%, payable semi-annually in cash or shares of our common stock; (iii) the convertible note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions ; and (iv) we issued to the convertible note holder four classes of warrants (A Warrants, B Warrants, C Warrants and D Warrants), which give the convertible note holder the right to purchase a total of 5,500,000 shares of our common stock as described below. The A and B Warrants originally expired one year after the effective date of a registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to register the subsequent sale of shares received from exercise of the A and B Warrants. The C Warrants and D Warrants originally expired eighteen months and twenty four months, respectively, after the effective date of a registration statement to be filed under the Securities Act. The A Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.60 per share, the B Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share, the C Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.10 per share, and the D Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the convertible note holder exercised 454,000 A Warrants. We entered into an exchange agreement dated October 31, 2007 in which the convertible note holder received 650,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for cancellation of the C and the D Warrants. The expiration date of the A Warrants and the B Warrants was extended from January 11, 2008 to December 3, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the convertible note holder exercised 64,400 A Warrants. On December 3, 2008, the remaining 231,600 A Warrants and 750,000 B Warrants were unexercised and expired.
On December 23, 2009 we entered into an amendment with the holder of our unsecured convertible note in the principal amount of $1.0 million which (i) extended the note maturity date to December 22, 2010 and (ii) increased the annual rate of interest from 5% to 8% commencing October 16, 2009. All other terms and conditions of the note remain unchanged.
On December 24, 2010 we closed on a Debt Restructuring as mentioned above, In connection with that Debt Restructuring the Company amended the note with the holder of a $1.0 million unsecured convertible note, pursuant to which the maturity date of the note was extended to December 31, 2013. We issued 150,000 shares to the holder of this note as consideration to extend the term of the note.
During March 2011, we issued 135,369 shares of common stock to the holder of our unsecured convertible note in satisfaction of $81,221 of accrued interest on the unsecured convertible note. Also in connection with the satisfaction of the accrued interest we granted to the holder a warrant to acquire up to 221,758 additional shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.96 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time for a five-year period. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the $157,400 value of the warrant was included in interest expense.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $46,400 and $300,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the conversion feature of the note. A derivative valuation gain of $253,600 and $1,101,900, respectively, was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $46,400 for the conversion feature of the note was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.16%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 1.0; (iii) expected volatility of 112.04%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
In connection with the amendment mentioned above, the principal value of the note is being accreted due to the difference in the value of the conversion feature before and after the amendment. The principal value of $1,000,000 of the unsecured convertible note was accreted over the amended term of the obligation, for which $333,336 was included in interest expense for each the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The note bears an 8% annual interest rate payable semi-annually, and for each the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, $80,000, was included in interest expense.
Senior Unsecured 6.25% Convertible Note
On December 24, 2007, we entered into a securities purchase agreement in which we raised $15,000,000 (less $937,000 of prepaid interest). We used the proceeds from this financing to support our CodecSys commercialization and development and for general working capital purposes. Pursuant to the financing, we issued a senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $15,000,000 (which principal amount has been increased as discussed below).The senior secured convertible note was originally due December 21, 2010, but was extended to December 21, 2013 and has been subsequently retired. The senior secured convertible note bore interest at 6.25% per annum (which rate has been changed as discussed below) if paid in cash. Interest for the first year was prepaid at closing. Interest-only payments thereafter in the amount of $234,375 are due quarterly and commenced in April 2009. Interest payments may be made through issuance of common stock in certain circumstances or may be capitalized and added to the principal. The original principal of the note was convertible into 2,752,294 shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $5.45 per share, convertible any time during the term of the note. We granted a first priority security interest in all of our property and assets and of our subsidiaries to secure our obligations under the note and related transaction agreements. In August 2009 we received a waiver from the note holder releasing their security interest for the equipment purchased under our sale lease back financing.
In connection with the 2007 financing, the senior secured convertible note holder received warrants to acquire 1,875,000 shares of our common stock exercisable at $5.00 per share. We also issued to the convertible note holder 1,000,000 shares of our common stock valued at $3,750,000 and incurred an additional $1,377,000 for commissions, finder’s fees and other transaction expenses, including the grant of a three-year warrant to purchase 112,500 shares of our common stock to a third party at an exercise price of $3.75 per share, valued at $252,000. A total of $1,377,000 was included in debt offering costs and is being amortized over the term of the note.
From March 26, 2010 through October 29, 2010, we entered into a series of amendments to the senior secured convertible note. Each of these amendments is described below.
On March 26, 2010, we entered into an amendment and extension agreement with the holder of the senior secured convertible note. The agreement conditionally amended the maturity date of the note to December 21, 2011. If we are unsuccessful in raising at least $6.0 million in equity financing before September 30, 2010, the maturity date of the note will automatically be restored to its original date of December 21, 2010. In consideration of entering into the agreement, the note holder was issued 1,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock valued at $990,000. In addition, we agreed to the inclusion of three additional terms and conditions in the note: (i) from and after the additional funding, we will be required to maintain a cash balance of at least $1,250,000 and provide monthly certifications of the cash balance to the note holder; (ii) we will not make principal payments on our outstanding $1.0 million unsecured convertible note without the written consent of the holder of the senior secured convertible note; and (iii) we will grant board observation rights to the note holder. Given these additional terms, unless the senior secured convertible note holder provides consent, of which there can be no assurance, we will be precluded from repaying the $1.0 million unsecured convertible note when it becomes due on December 22, 2010.
On July 30, 2010, we entered into a further amendment agreement with the holder of the senior secured convertible note regarding the note and warrant reset provisions. The July 30, 2010 amendment conditionally amended the maturity date of the note to June 21, 2012. If we are unsuccessful in raising the $6.0 million in equity financing referenced above, the maturity date of the note will automatically be restored to its original date of December 21, 2010. The holder of the note agreed to a conversion price of the note of $1.80 per share instead of the price at which we sell equity between now and September 30, 2010 and reduced the required cash balance referenced in the March 26, 2010 amendment above from $1,250,000 to $950,000. In addition, the number of warrants originally granted to the holder pursuant to the 2007 financing increased from 1,875,000 to 5,208,333 and were exercisable at $1.80 per share instead of $5.00 per share. The warrants continued to be exercisable any time for the five years from the original date of grant. In consideration of entering into the July 30, 2010 amendment the note holder was issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock and would be issued an additional 800,000 shares of our common stock contingent upon completion of the required equity raise.
On September 27, 2010, we entered into a further amendment agreement with the holder of the senior secured convertible note regarding the note. Pursuant to this amendment, the due date for the required equity financing was extended to October 31, 2010.
On October 29, 2010, we entered into a fourth amendment agreement with the holder of the senior secured convertible note regarding the note and warrant provisions. The fourth amendment (i) increased the amount of the required equity raise to $8.0 million, approximately $2.5 million of which had been raised or committed by investors at the time of the amendment; (ii) extended the time in which we can complete the equity financing to December 3, 2010; (iii) deleted the provision of the senior secured convertible note that granted the Company the option to redeem the note prior to its maturity date; (iv) changed the conversion price of the note upon successful completion of the required capital raise to an amount equal to 150% of the lowest price at which Company common stock is sold during calendar year 2010; (v) changed the exercised price of the warrants to an amount equal to 150% of the lowest price at which Company common stock is sold during calendar year 2010; (vi) provides that if we are successful in completing the required capital raise the number of warrants will be increased as currently provided in the 6.25% senior secured convertible promissory note; and (vii) extended the expiration date of the warrants to December 31, 2013.
If the additional funding was not completed by December 3, 2010, certain provisions of the prior amendments became void in that the maturity date will revert back to December 21, 2010, the conversion price became the lowest price at which equity securities had been sold, the exercise price became the lowest price at which equity securities have been sold, the number of warrants then outstanding would be determined by the original purchase documents, and the Company would not have an obligation to maintain a balance of cash and marketable securities equal to $950,000.
On December 24, 2010, we closed on the Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, we (i) issued an Amended and Restated Senior Convertible Note in the principal amount of $5.5 million (the “Amended and Restated Note”) to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), (ii) paid $2.5 million in cash to Castlerigg, (iii) cancelled warrants previously issued to Castlerigg that were exercisable for a total of 5,208,333 shares of common stock, (iv) issued 800,000 shares of common stock to Castlerigg in satisfaction of an obligation under a prior loan amendment, (v) entered into the Letter Agreement pursuant to which we paid Castlerigg an additional $2.75 million in cash in lieu of the issuance of $3.5 million in stock and warrants as provided in the loan restructuring agreement under which the Amended and Restated Note and other documents was issued (the “Loan Restructuring Agreement”), and (vi) entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with Castlerigg dated December 23, 2010. As a result of the foregoing, Castlerigg forgave approximately $7.2 million of principal and accrued but unpaid interest. The Debt Restructuring was considered a troubled-debt restructuring and a gain on debt restructuring of $3,062,457 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010, which was the difference between the adjusted carrying value of the original note and the carrying value of the Amended and Restated Note.
The Amended and Restated Note, dated December 23, 2010, is a senior, unsecured note that matures in three years from the closing and bore interest at an annual rate of 6.25%, payable semi-annually. We paid the first year’s interest of approximately $344,000 at the closing. The Amended and Restated Note is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.35 per share, subject to adjustment. The Amended and Restated Note is convertible in whole or in part at any time upon notice by Castlerigg to us. The Amended and Restated Note also contains various restrictions, acceleration provisions and other standard and customary terms and conditions. Two of our consolidated subsidiaries guaranteed our obligations under the Amended and Restated Note.
The Investor Rights Agreement provides Castlerigg with certain registration rights with respect to the Company’s securities held by Castlerigg. These registration rights include an obligation of the Company to issue additional warrants to Castlerigg if certain registration deadlines or conditions were not satisfied. The agreement also contains full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than the conversion price described above.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”), as well as a restructuring of our outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”), resulting in complete satisfaction of our senior indebtedness under the Amended and Restated Note.
A portion of the net proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing was used to close on the 2012 Debt Restructuring. The Company paid $2,750,000 and issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $760,000 in satisfaction of the Amended and Restated Note and remaining interest value of $680,816. In consideration of negotiating the 2012 Debt Restructuring and amending our agreement with our placement agent, we paid $275,041 and issued 586,164 shares of our common stock valued at $222,742 to our placement agent, and recognized a $2,173,033 gain on extinguishment of debt as a result of this retirement.
With the retirement of the Amended and Restated Note we recorded no aggregate derivative liability at December 31, 2012, however at the date of retirement we recorded a derivative valuation gain of $203,700, related to the conversion feature of the Amended and Restated Note to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative from December 31, 2011 to the date of retirement. The derivative value of $81,500 at the date of retirement was recorded as additional paid in capital.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $285,200 at December 31, 2011, related to the conversion features of the Amended and Restated Note and the conversion feature and warrants related to the Original Note. A derivative valuation gain of $2,322,200 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2011 to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative.
The $6,180,816 value of the Amended and Restated Note at December 31, 2011 consists of $5,500,000 for the principal due of the note plus $680,816 for aggregate future interest due of which $171,875 is payable in 2012 and has been included in current debt obligations at December 31, 2011 and was retired pursuant to the 2012 Debt Restructuring noted above.
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreements
During the year ended December 31, 2010 we entered into two Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreements with one individual for an aggregate amount of $775,000. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we remitted $100,000 of the principal balance plus accrued interest of $8,360 and converted the remaining $675,000 of principal balance plus $109,292 of accrued and unpaid interest into 1,307,153 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 653,576 shares of our common stock. The warrants contain anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than $1.00 per share. The current exercise price has been reset to $0.725 per share due to subsequent financings.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $5,900 and $156,300 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the conversion feature of the note. A derivative valuation gain of $253,600 and $293,800, respectively, was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $5,900 for the conversion feature of the note was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.36%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 3.20; (iii) expected volatility of 83.16%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
Bridge Loan
On December 28, 2011 we entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase and Security Agreement with seven individuals for an aggregate of $1,300,000 (“Bridge Loan”) to be used as working capital. The note bears an annual interest rate of 18%, payable monthly in cash. Additionally, we granted to the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a five year term to purchase an aggregate of 357,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65. The note was due on February 28, 2012, but the term was subsequently extended to the earlier of the date nine months from the original maturity date or the date we closed on an additional sale of our securities that resulted in gross proceeds to us of $12 million. In consideration of the extension of the maturity date of the Bridge Loan, we granted the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a six year term to purchase 247,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. This note is collateralized by a security interest in all of our accounts receivable
In connection with the Bridge Loan, we paid an $84,500 placement fee and issued warrants to purchase 65,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share and subsequently reset to $0.53, to our investment banker for services in completing the above transaction and paid a $3,000 escrow fee to the Escrow Agent in exchange for holding the funds prior to their disbursement to us.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the associated securities purchase agreement, two of the above described bridge lenders converted the principal balance of their portion of the bridge loan in the amount of $400,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing, reducing the outstanding principal balance to $900,000. The warrants issued had a total value of $222,426 which resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $222,426. The aggregate derivative liability and valuation gain or loss for the warrants issued for the converted portion of the principal balance are included in the aggregate of 2012 Equity Financing information.
All warrants mentioned above were issued with price protection provisions and were accounted for as derivative liabilities and valued using a Black Scholes pricing model.
On July 13, 2012 the $900,000 principal balance was retired and was included as part of the 2012 Convertible Note (as described below) and recorded a (i) $93,661 loss on extinguishment of debt related to the remaining un-accreted portion of the note and (ii) $53,160 expense related to unrecognized offering costs, at the time of retirement.
At December 31, 2012 we recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $7,400 related to the reset provision for the original and placement warrants issued. A derivative valuation gain of $136,300 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability from December 31, 2011. The aggregate derivative liability of $7,400 for the reset provision of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.54%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 4.0; (iii) expected volatility of 82.55%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
At December 31, 2012 we recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $7,200 related to the reset provision for the warrants issued for an extension of the maturity date. A derivative valuation gain of $89,325 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability from the time the warrants were issued. The aggregate derivative liability of $7,200 for the reset provision of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.54%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 4.0; (iii) expected volatility of 82.55%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
The principal value of the note was being accreted over the amended term of the obligation, for which $106,723 and 7,041 were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The note bore an 18% annual interest rate, and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, $100,899 and $2,564, respectively were included in interest expense.
Equipment Purchase and Sale Agreement
In October 2011, we entered into an Equipment Purchase and Sale Agreement with a Utah corporation whereby we use the funds advanced to purchase certain electronic receiving and digital signage equipment along with installation costs. A 3% fee is due each month the amount remains outstanding. At December 31, 2011 we had an outstanding amount owed of $700,000 and had accrued two months of fees totaling $42,000 which was included as interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2011.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the associated securities purchase agreement the above described lender converted the principal balance of its portion of the loan in the amount of $500,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing, the remaining $200,000 principal balance plus $105,000 of interest due was paid in cash. The warrants issued had a total value of $278,032 which resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $278,032. The aggregate derivative liability and valuation gain or loss for the warrants issued for the converted portion of the principal balance are included in the aggregate of 2012 Equity Financing information.
The 3% fee mention above was recorded as interest expense and or the years ended December 31 2012 and 2011, $63,000 and $42,000 were included, respectively.
Note 6 – Investment in Interact Devices, Inc (IDI)
We began investing in and advancing monies to IDI in 2001. IDI was developing technology which became an initial part of the CodecSys technology.
On October 23, 2003, IDI filed for Chapter 11 Federal Bankruptcy protection. We desired that the underlying patent process proceed and that the development of CodecSys technology continue. Therefore, we participated in IDI’s plan of reorganization, whereby we would satisfy the debts of the creditors and obtained certain licensing rights. On May 18, 2004, the debtor-in-possession’s plan of reorganization for IDI was confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court. As a result of this confirmation, we issued to the creditors of IDI shares of our common stock and cash in exchange for approximately 50,127,218 shares of the common stock of IDI. Since May 18, 2004, we have acquired additional common share equivalents IDI. During the year ended December 31, 2012 we did not acquire any IDI share equivalents. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we acquired 414,172 IDI common share equivalents in exchange for 27,611 shares of our common stock valued at $10,760. As of December 31, 2012, we owned approximately 55,897,169 IDI common share equivalents, representing approximately 94% of the total outstanding IDI share equivalents
Since May 18, 2004, we have advanced additional cash to IDI for the payment of operating expenses, which continues development and marketing of the CodecSys technology. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we have advanced an aggregate amount of $3,347,255 and $3,126,772 respectively, pursuant to a promissory note that is secured by assets and technology of IDI.
Note 7 – Operating Leases
Our executive offices are located at 7050 Union Park Avenue, Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84047. We occupy the space at the executive offices under a 39-month lease, the term of which ends January 31, 2015. The lease covers approximately 13,880 square feet of office space leased at a rate of $23,049 per month. We occupy a production studio located at 6952 South 185 West, Unit C, Salt Lake City, Utah 84047, which consists of approximately 7,500 square feet on a month to month basis, at the rate of $7,000 per month plus utilities. We have no other properties. We recognized rent expense of approximately $352,789 and $463,694, in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
We also lease copy machines on multi-year leases that expire in March 2014 at a minimum rate of $655 per month.
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2012 are as follow:
|
2013
|
|
$ |
284,447 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
278,552 |
|
|
2015
|
|
|
23,049 |
|
| |
|
$ |
586,048 |
|
Note 8 – Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Net deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components as of December 31, 2011 and 2012:
| |
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL carry-forward
|
|
$ |
23,862,500 |
|
|
$ |
25,881,900 |
|
|
General business credit carry-forwards
|
|
|
1,147,000 |
|
|
|
1,158,900 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
83,500 |
|
|
|
78,500 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(173,000 |
) |
|
|
61,700 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(24,941,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,212,600 |
) |
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 due to the following:
| |
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax (expense) benefit at statutory rates
|
|
$ |
1,902,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,600 |
|
|
State income tax (expense) benefit at statutory rates
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
269,300 |
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,182,500 |
) |
|
|
(2,100,900 |
) |
| |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
At December 31, 2012, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $66,364,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2013 through 2032. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2011 and 2012 consolidated financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
Due to change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry-forwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carry-forwards may be limited as to use in future years.
Note 9 – Preferred and Common Stock
We have authorized two classes of stock, 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with no par value and 180,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.05 par value. No preferred stock has been issued, while 107,473,820 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012. Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends if and when declared and are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we issued 31,498,164 shares of our common stock as follows: (i) 24,816,000 related to our 2012 Equity Financing and Debt Restructuring, (ii) 5,600,000 for debt conversions and (iii) 1,082,164 for services rendered by consultants.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 1,897,503 shares of our common stock as follows: (i) 1,307,153 for debt to equity conversions, (ii) 372,272 for warrant exercises, (iii) 135,369 for interest instead of cash, (iv) 55,098 for employee option exercises and (v) 27,611 shares for conversion of IDI share equivalents.
Note 10 – Stock-based Compensation
In accordance with ASC Topic 718, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the awards, and recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award for awards expected to vest.
Stock Incentive Plans
Under the Broadcast International, Inc. 2004 Long-term Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), the board of directors may issue incentive stock options to employees and directors and non-qualified stock options to consultants of the company. Options generally may not be exercised until twelve months after the date granted and expire ten years after being granted. Options granted vest in accordance with the vesting schedule determined by the board of directors, usually ratably over a three-year vesting schedule upon anniversary date of the grant. Should an employee terminate before the vesting period is completed, the unvested portion of each grant is forfeited. We have used the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate fair value of our stock-based awards, which requires various judgmental assumptions including estimated stock price volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected life. Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility. The number of unissued stock options authorized under the 2004 Plan at December 31, 2012 was 3,779,508.
The Broadcast International, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) has become our primary plan for providing stock-based incentive compensation to our eligible employees and non-employee directors and consultants of the company. The provisions of the 2008 Plan are similar to the 2004 Plan except that the 2008 Plan allows for the grant of share equivalents such as restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, performance shares and restricted stock units in addition to non-qualified and incentive stock options. We continue to maintain and grant awards under our 2004 Plan which will remain in effect until it expires by its terms. The number of unissued shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2008 Plan was 774,867 at December 31, 2012.
Stock Options
We estimate the fair value of stock option awards granted beginning January 1, 2006 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We then amortize the fair value of awards expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the period from the grant date to the end of the vesting period. The Black-Scholes valuation model requires various judgmental assumptions including the estimated volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the stock option award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option award. The expected option term is derived from an analysis of historical experience of similar awards combined with expected future exercise patterns based on several factors including the strike price in relation to the current and expected stock price, the minimum vest period and the remaining contractual period.
The fair values for the options granted in 2012 and 2011 were estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
78.97 |
% |
|
|
80.89 |
% |
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $0.27 and $0.61, respectively.
Warrants
We estimate the fair value of issued warrants on the date of issuance as determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model. We amortize the fair value of issued warrants using a vesting schedule based on the terms and conditions of each associated underling contract, as earned. The Black-Scholes valuation model requires various judgmental assumptions including the estimated volatility, risk-free interest rate and warrant expected exercise term. Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the warrant was issued with a maturity equal to the expected term of the warrant.
The fair values for the warrants granted in 2012 and 2011 were estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
82.79 |
% |
|
|
85.37 |
% |
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
The weighted average fair value of warrants granted during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $0.23 and $0.67, respectively.
Results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 includes $283,692 and $2,262,540, respectively, of non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Restricted stock units and options issued to directors vest immediately. All other restricted stock units, options and warrants are subject to applicable vesting schedules. Expense is recognized proportionally as each award or grant vests.
For the year ended December 31, 2012 we recognized $283,692 of stock based compensation as follows: (i) $65,500 for 390,133 restricted stock units issued to 5 members of the board of directors, (ii) $833 for 50,000 options granted to 4 employees and (iii) $217,359 resulting from the vesting of unexpired options and warrants issued prior to January 1, 2012.
For the year ended December 31, 2011 we recognized $2,262,540 of stock based compensation expense as follows: (i) $1,544,000 for 1,400,000 restricted stock units issued to all 5 members of the board of directors, (ii) $124,000 for 200,000 restricted stock units issued to one employee, (iii) $364,000 for 600,000 options issued to one individual and one corporation for consulting services, (iv) $96,489 for 909,200 options granted to 43 employees, (v) $15,000 for 50,000 options granted to one member of our advisory board, (vi) $4,263 for 8,700 options granted to 15 of our non-employee installation technicians and (vi) $114,788 resulting from the vesting of unexpired options and warrants issued prior to January 1, 2011. Additionally, we issued (i) 221,758 warrants to our unsecured convertible note holder, (ii) 653,576 warrants related to our accounts receivable purchase agreements, (iii) 422,500 warrants related to our Bridge Loan. See Note 5. There were 400,000 warrants exercised in the year ending December 31, 2011.
The following table summarizes option and warrant activity during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
| |
|
Options
and
Warrants
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
20,442,170 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
1,567,900 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
Warrants issued
|
|
|
1,697,834 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(302,054 |
) |
|
|
18.67 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,510,201 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(455,098 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
20,440,551 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
Warrants issued
|
|
|
24,817,900 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(252,669 |
) |
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,658,919 |
) |
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
43,396,863 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants outstanding at December 31, 2012.
| |
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
|
Contractual
Life (years)
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
| $ |
0.17-0.95 |
|
|
|
39,583,684 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
39,207,017 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
| |
1.00-1.59 |
|
|
|
3,306,679 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
3,248,146 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
| |
2.25-4.00 |
|
|
|
506,500 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
506,500 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
| $ |
0.17-4.00 |
|
|
|
43,396,863 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
42,961,663 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
There were no options exercised in the year ended December 31, 2012 and 55,098 options were exercised in the year ended December 31, 2011. There was no intrinsic value of options and warrants available and exercisable for the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.
Restricted Stock Units
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, 390,133 and 1,600,000 restricted stock units were awarded, respectively. The cost of restricted stock units is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of the grant and compensation expense is recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule. All of the restricted stock units vested during the year they were awarded.
The following is a summary of restricted stock unit activity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
| |
|
Restricted
Stock Units
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
950,000 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
Awarded at fair value
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Settled by issuance of stock
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
Awarded at fair value
|
|
|
390,133 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Settled by issuance of stock
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
2,940,133 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
Vested at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
2,940,133 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
Included in stock based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2012, was $65,500 for 390,133 restricted stock units issued to all 5 members of the board of directors, all of which were recorded in general and administrative expense.
Included in stock based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2011, was $1,668,000 as follows; (i) $1,544,000 for 1,400,000 restricted stock units issued to all 5 members of the board of directors, (ii) $124,000 for 200,000 restricted stock units issued to one employee, all of which were recorded in general and administrative expense.
The impact on our results of operations for recording stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
| |
|
For the years ended
|
|
| |
|
December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
185,478 |
|
|
$ |
2,043,386 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
98,214 |
|
|
|
219,154 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
283,692 |
|
|
$ |
2,262,540 |
|
Total unrecognized stock-based compensation was $180,732 at December 31, 2012, which we expect to recognize over the next three years in accordance with vesting provisions as follows:
|
2013
|
|
$118,127
|
|
2014
|
|
62,038
|
|
2015
|
|
567
|
|
Total
|
|
$180,732
|
Note 11 – Equipment Financing
On August 27, 2009, we completed an equipment lease financing transaction with a financial institution. Pursuant to the financing, we entered into various material agreements with the financial institution. These agreements are identified and summarized below.
We entered into a Master Lease Agreement dated as of July 28, 2009 with the financial institution pursuant to which we sold to the financing institution certain telecommunications equipment to be installed at 1,981 (subsequent additional locations have increased the customer’s network to an aggregate of approximately 2,100 locations) of our customer’s retail locations in exchange for a one-time payment of $4,100,670 by the financial institution. We paid to the financial institution 36 monthly lease payments of approximately $144,000 plus applicable sales taxes. We had the right to terminate the lease after making 33 payments for a termination fee of the higher of approximately 10% of the original equipment value (approximately $410,000) or the then “in-place fair market value” after which payment we would own all of the equipment. We gave timely notice of exercise of this option. We are currently a party to a lawsuit to determine if the “in-place fair market value” exceeds the 10% of the original lease value and by what amount. We contend that the three payments made subsequent to the notice exercising our right to purchase constitute full payment for the equipment. The equipment broker contends that we owe an additional amount. Our accounting records reflect that the capital lease has been retired and the equipment has been fully depreciated.
We also entered into a security agreement with the financial institution pursuant to which we granted a first priority security interest in the equipment, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, and in our customer service agreement and service payments thereunder during the term of the equipment lease.
During 2012 we had made lease payments totaling approximately $1,125,588 of which $1,067,649 was applied toward the outstanding lease and $57,939 was included in interest expense. Included in the $1,125,588 is approximately $422,100 paid toward the in place fair market value. Additionally during the year ended December 31, 2012 we made payments of $140,700 into an escrow account held by the court pending resolution of our dispute. For the year ending December 31, 2012, we expensed the final $33,512 of our lease acquisition fee of $150,792 which was being recognized over the life of the lease included in interest expense.
During 2011 we had made lease payments totaling approximately $1,688,382 of which $1,423,528 was applied toward the outstanding lease and $264,854 was included in interest expense. Additionally, we expensed $50,268 of our lease acquisition fee of $150,792 which is being recognized over the life of the lease included in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Note 12 – Fair Value Measurements
We adopted ASC Topic 820 as of January 1, 2008 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). These tiers include:
|
|
·
|
Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
We measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows at December 31, 2012:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative valuation (1)
|
|
$ |
1,191,269 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
1,191,269 |
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$ |
1,191,269 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
1,191,269 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Notes 4 & 5 for additional discussion.
|
|
The table below presents our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at December 31, 2012. We classify financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model.
| |
|
Derivative
|
|
| |
|
Valuation
|
|
| |
|
Liability
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
(3,760,200 |
) |
|
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net income
|
|
|
8,829,748 |
|
|
Valuation adjustment
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(6,260,817 |
) |
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
$ |
(1,191,269 |
) |
Money Market Funds and Treasury Securities
The money market funds and treasury cash reserve securities balances are classified as cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheet.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of our accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their immediate or short-term maturities. The aggregate carrying amount of the notes payable approximates fair value as the individual notes bear interest at market interest rates and there hasn’t been a significant change in our operations and risk profile.
Note 13 – Retirement Plan
We have implemented a 401(k) employee retirement plan. Under the terms of the plan, participants may elect to contribute a portion of their compensation, generally up to 60%, to the plan, subject to IRS Code Section 415 limitations. We match contributions up to 100% of the first 3% of a participant’s compensation contributed to the plan and 50% of the next 2%. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan after three months of service as defined by the plan. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we made matching contributions totaling $99,761 and $90,453, respectively.
Note 14 – Legal Proceedings
We have pending legal matters. We have a judgment rendered against us in a lawsuit, the total amount in dispute in which is approximately $130,000.
On July 27, 2012, CTC Resources Inc. dba U.S. Media Capital (“CTC”) filed a lawsuit in the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake City, State of Utah against ACC Capital Corporation (“ACC”), Loni L. Lowder and the Company (the “CTCD Lawsuit”) asserting claims for relief for breach of contract against ACC, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud against ACC and Mr. Lowder and civil conspiracy against ACC, Mr. Lowder and the Company, and seeking injunctive relief and constructive trust as to all defendants as well as money damages. On October 9, 2012, we filed our answer as well as a cross claim against ACC seeking declaratory relief as to the price to be paid by us for the leased equipment and specific performance against ACC. On January 7, 2013 in a hearing relative to a temporary injunction previously granted by the Court, the Court took testimony and heard arguments from the parties on the matter and the Court and the parties agreed that a trial would be unnecessary. Both parties submitted briefs regarding the law and summarizing the testimony elicited at the hearing. The Court’s judgment rendered on February 25, 2013 vacated the parties’ joint appraisal and required that the parties jointly secure another appraisal for the equipment, the results of which will be binding on the parties. We have paid $424,500 toward the purchase price of the equipment, which we believe satisfies our payment obligation, but pursuant to a restraining order we sought to prevent the lessor from contacting our customer as of March 26, 2013 we have escrowed an aggregate of $425,100 with the Court and have a current obligation to continue making monthly escrow payments in the amount of $141,700 pending a decision in the matter.
Note 15 – Liquidity
Broadcast experienced negative cash flow used in operations during the year of $3,362,785 compared to negative cash flow used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $5,164,437. Our current monthly excess of cash expenses over income is approximately $300,000 per month. During 2012 the decreased in negative cash flow was realized primarily through a reduction in the number of employees by approximately 40%, with more reductions scheduled, as well as additional expense reduction actions including reducing sales and general and administrative expenses. In addition, we have commenced an initiative designed to satisfy accounts payable through the issuance of common stock, which will further decrease our need for cash. We have to date received verbal and/or written commitments to accept partial payments and/or stock in full satisfaction of at least $600,000 of current payables and indebtedness.
The negative cash flow was met by cash reserves from the completion of the 2012 Equity Financing and the issuance of the 2012 Convertible Debt in the total amount of $3,050,000, which included $900,000 of Bridge Loan indebtedness that was converted to the 2012 Convertible Debt. In addition, we received $400,000 in January, 2013. We have commitments from current debt holders to fund up to an additional $1.550 million of our 2012 Convertible debt to offset future negative cash flow. We expect to continue to experience negative operating cash flow as long as we continue our current expenditures related primarily to bringing CodecSys products to market, continue our development of CodecSys or until we begin to receive licensing revenue from sales of CodecSys proprietary software or increase sales in our network division by adding new customers. We are actively pursuing potential customers to replace lost revenues when the BofA contract expires.
Note 16 – Supplemental Cash Flow Information
2012
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2012 we issued 586,164 shares our common stock, valued at $222,742 to a placement agency for services rendered related to our 2012 Equity Financing and Debt Restructuring agreement
|
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we issued 496,000 shares of our common stock valued at $177,313 to two consultants and one corporation of which (i) 250,000 shares was in consideration for cancellation of a warrant issued for consulting services rendered and (ii) 246,000 was for consulting services rendered.
|
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized $1,024,754 in depreciation and amortization expense from the following: (i) $466,606 related to cost of sales for equipment used directly by or for customers, (ii) $547,997 related to equipment other property and equipment, and (iii) $10,151 for patent amortization.
|
|
|
·
|
For the year ended December 31, 2012, an aggregate non-cash expense of $941,225 was recorded for the accretion of our convertible notes of which (i) $501,166 was for the accretion of our 2012 Secured Convertible Note (ii) $333,336 was related to our unsecured convertible note and (iii) $106,723 was for our bridge loan.
|
2011
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we granted options to acquire up to 600,000 shares of our common stock valued at $389,000 to two consultants in consideration of consulting services to be rendered by the consultants over a one-year period pursuant to a written consulting agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the value of options is being recognized over the contract period and $364,000 was included in stock based compensation.
|
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011 we issued 135,369 shares our common stock to an individual for interest owed on a debt obligation, valued at $81,221 which was accrued at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011 we acquired 414,172 IDI common share equivalents in exchange for 27,611 shares of our common stock valued at $10,760 which was expensed to research and development.
|
|
|
·
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized $1,483,868 in depreciation and amortization expense from the following: (i) $798,677 related to cost of sales for equipment used directly by or for customers, (ii) $675,040 related to equipment other property and equipment, and (iii) $10,151 for patent amortization.
|
|
|
·
|
For the year ended December 31, 2011, an aggregate non-cash expense of $340,377 was recorded for the accretion of our convertible notes of which (i) $333,336 was related to our unsecured convertible note and (ii) $7,041 was for our bridge loan.
|
|
|
·
|
On March 21, 2011, the Company, converted $784,292 of its short-term debt into equity through the issuance of common stock and warrants to two lenders at the same unit pricing as the Equity Financing. In consideration of converting the short- term loans on the basis of $1.20 for two shares of common stock plus one warrant at an exercise price of $1.00, the Company issued 1,307,153 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire up to 653,576 shares of common stock, which warrants have a five year term and are exercisable at $1.00 per share. The $784,292 above is net of expense and includes $109,292 of interest of which $89,658 was accrued in the year ended December 31, 2010 and $19,634 which was included as interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company’s objective for converting the short-term debt into equity is to conserve cash for further market development.
|
|
|
·
|
In March 2011, we granted to the holder of our senior unsecured convertible note a warrant to acquire 400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $.05 per share in consideration of a waiver of the holder’s reset provision that allowed us to convert certain short terms loans to equity without causing an adjustment in the conversion price of our senior note. The warrants had a 5-year life from the date of grant, contained full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions and were valued at $404,000 using a Black Scholes pricing model on the date of grant. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the warrant holder exercised these warrants using a cashless provision resulting in the company issuing 372,272 shares of our common stock
|
We paid no cash for income taxes during the years ended December 31 2012 and 2011.
Note 17 – Subsequent Events
During January 2013, we sold additional convertible promissory notes in the principal amount of $425,000 on our 2012 Convertible Note offering due on July 13, 2013. The notes are convertible at $.25 per share and are secured by all of our assets. In addition, we issued warrants to acquire up to 850,000 shares of our common stock to the holders of the notes. The warrants have a five year life and are exercisable at $.25 per share.
In March 2013 we issued 258,553 shares of common stock to a former director in settlement of his Restricted Stock Units. In addition, we issued to him 200,000 shares of common stock in satisfaction of unpaid director’s fees of $15,000.
In March 2013 we granted Restricted Stock Units to four of our directors in satisfaction of unpaid director’s fees of $51,500. The Restricted Stock Units may be settled by the issuance of 686,667 shares of our common stock at the time the directors retire from the board.
On January 7, 2013 we entered into a Merger Agreement with AllDigital, Inc., a Nevada corporation. The merger is subject among other things to normal due diligence, approval of the shareholders of both companies, and the filing and effectiveness of a registration statement. The registration statement requires year-end financial statements be included with the proxy statements furnished to the shareholders and will not be effective until at least the second quarter of 2013. On February 8, 2013, All Digital notified us that we were in breach of certain covenants regarding unencumbered ownership or potential claims against our technology and intellectual property, which gave us 30 days to cure the alleged defects before the merger agreement could be terminated. On March 8, 2013 All Digital notified us that sufficient progress had been made that the cure period was extended to April 8, 2013 for the remainder of the alleged defects to be cured or waived
Pursuant to the January 6, 2013 Amendment and Settlement Agreement with each of Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon, their respective employment agreements were modified and we agreed to issue each of Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon 529,100 shares of common stock if they were terminated by us at any time following January 6, 2013. All other termination benefits and severance benefits for Mr. Tiede and Mr. Solomon, were terminated as of January 6, 2013. We had an obligation as of March 6, 2013 to issue to each of them 529,100 shares of common stock.
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
394,342 |
|
|
$ |
686,347 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
140,700 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
821,608 |
|
|
|
93,379 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
306,296 |
|
|
|
26,269 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
90,067 |
|
|
|
71,443 |
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,753,013 |
|
|
|
877,438 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
572,107 |
|
|
|
108,225 |
|
|
Other Assets, non current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt offering costs
|
|
|
42,176 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
Patents, net
|
|
|
120,928 |
|
|
|
127,382 |
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
196,292 |
|
|
|
115,853 |
|
|
Total other assets, non current
|
|
|
359,396 |
|
|
|
246,477 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,684,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,232,140 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
2,293,470 |
|
|
$ |
1,038,464 |
|
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
|
|
363,568 |
|
|
|
138,924 |
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
299,728 |
|
|
|
470,268 |
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
51,335 |
|
|
|
13,539 |
|
|
Current portion of notes payable (net of discount of $947,994
and $212,529, respectively)
|
|
|
3,102,006 |
|
|
|
5,032,471 |
|
|
Derivative valuation
|
|
|
1,191,269 |
|
|
|
1,275,275 |
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,301,376 |
|
|
|
7,968,941 |
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,301,376 |
|
|
|
7,968,941 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Common stock, $.05 par value, 180,000,000 shares authorized;
107,473,820 and 110,233,225 shares issued as of December 31,
2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively
|
|
|
5,373,691 |
|
|
|
5,511,661 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
99,594,490 |
|
|
|
99,681,351 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(109,585,041 |
) |
|
|
(111,929,813 |
) |
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(4,616,860 |
) |
|
|
(6,736,801 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
|
$ |
2,684,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,232,140 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
| |
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
For the six months ended
|
|
| |
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,999,988 |
|
|
$ |
974,657 |
|
|
$ |
3,745,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,455,226 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,345,966 |
|
|
|
796,333 |
|
|
|
2,591,458 |
|
|
|
1,573,902 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
654,022 |
|
|
|
178,324 |
|
|
|
1,153,627 |
|
|
|
881,324 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and general
|
|
|
1,259,320 |
|
|
|
642,116 |
|
|
|
2,588,601 |
|
|
|
1,628,325 |
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
598,841 |
|
|
|
47,539 |
|
|
|
1,115,240 |
|
|
|
185,008 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
464,847 |
|
|
|
168,939 |
|
|
|
1,021,414 |
|
|
|
394,313 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
164,043 |
|
|
|
54,016 |
|
|
|
326,675 |
|
|
|
149,880 |
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,487,051 |
|
|
|
912,610 |
|
|
|
5,051,930 |
|
|
|
2,357,526 |
|
|
Total operating loss
|
|
|
(1,833,029 |
) |
|
|
(734,286 |
) |
|
|
(3,898,303 |
) |
|
|
(1,476,202 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(263,483 |
) |
|
|
(591,398 |
) |
|
|
(606,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,125,183 |
) |
|
Gain (loss) on derivative valuation
|
|
|
2,959,155 |
|
|
|
709,509 |
|
|
|
4,588,480 |
|
|
|
(25,606 |
) |
|
Equity issuance costs related to warrants
|
|
|
(18,836 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(1,095,309 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
345,397 |
|
|
|
1,672,575 |
|
|
|
414,484 |
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,799 |
) |
|
|
(186,621 |
) |
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
(136,621 |
) |
|
Other income , net
|
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
4,356 |
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,680,221 |
|
|
|
277,077 |
|
|
|
4,560,018 |
|
|
|
(868,570 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
847,192 |
|
|
|
(457,209 |
) |
|
|
661,715 |
|
|
|
(2,344,772 |
) |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Net profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
847,192 |
|
|
$ |
(457,209 |
) |
|
$ |
661,715 |
|
|
$ |
(2,344,772 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit (loss) per share – basic
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
Net profit (loss) per share – diluted
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares – basic
|
|
|
107,193,974 |
|
|
|
108,284,171 |
|
|
|
94,167,466 |
|
|
|
107,977,505 |
|
|
Weighted average shares –diluted
|
|
|
114,128,974 |
|
|
|
108,284,171 |
|
|
|
104,042,079 |
|
|
|
107,977,505 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| |
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
| |
|
June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
661,715 |
|
|
$ |
(2,344,772 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
723,194 |
|
|
|
151,047 |
|
|
Common stock issued for services
|
|
|
137,500 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
Accretion of discount on convertible notes payable
|
|
|
265,636 |
|
|
|
793,865 |
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
193,586 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
136,621 |
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(1,672,575 |
) |
|
|
(414,484 |
) |
|
Gain (loss) on derivative liability valuation
|
|
|
(4,588,480 |
) |
|
|
25,606 |
|
|
Warrants issued and expensed for issuance costs
|
|
|
1,095,309 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
|
(28,147 |
) |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
26,358 |
|
|
|
763,461 |
|
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories
|
|
|
(270,721 |
) |
|
|
17,915 |
|
|
Decrease in debt offering costs
|
|
|
58,907 |
|
|
|
38,934 |
|
|
Decrease in prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
195,030 |
|
|
|
87,534 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,414,189 |
|
|
|
(246,728 |
) |
|
Decrease in deferred revenues
|
|
|
(9,009 |
) |
|
|
(37,796 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(1,773,339 |
) |
|
|
(1,052,472 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment
|
|
|
(142,699 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
75,423 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(141,949 |
) |
|
|
75,423 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity financing
|
|
|
6,150,000 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
Proceeds from debt financing
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
770,000 |
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
(3,741,194 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
Equity issuance costs
|
|
|
(776,483 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
140,700 |
|
|
Payments for debt extinguishment and related costs
|
|
|
(275,041 |
) |
|
|
(66,646 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,357,282 |
|
|
|
1,269,054 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(558,006 |
) |
|
|
292,005 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash beginning of period
|
|
|
961,265 |
|
|
|
394,342 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash end of period
|
|
$ |
403,259 |
|
|
$ |
686,347 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
248,643 |
|
|
$ |
65,700 |
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
BROADCAST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
June 30, 2013
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Broadcast International, Inc. (“we” or the “Company”) contain the adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly our financial position at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, with the cash flows for each of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Note 2 - Reclassifications
Certain 2012 financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to 2013 presentations.
Note 3 – Weighted Average Shares
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, plus the dilutive common stock equivalents that would rise from the exercise of stock options, warrants and restricted stock units outstanding during the period, using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the period, plus the effect of assuming conversion of the convertible debt.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2013:
| |
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
For the six months ended
|
|
| |
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
847,192 |
|
|
$ |
(457,209 |
) |
|
$ |
661,715 |
|
|
$ |
(2,344,772 |
) |
|
Effect on earnings of dilutive convertible debt
|
|
|
(225,266 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
233,068 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Net income (loss) plus assumed conversions
|
|
|
621,926 |
|
|
|
(457,209 |
) |
|
|
894,783 |
|
|
|
(2,334,772 |
) |
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
107,193,974 |
|
|
|
108,284,171 |
|
|
|
94,167,466 |
|
|
|
107,977,505 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and warrants
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,939,613 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
2,935,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,935,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
114,128,974 |
|
|
|
108,284,171 |
|
|
|
104,042,079 |
|
|
|
107,977,505 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
As we experienced net losses during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2013 no common stock equivalents have been included in the diluted earnings per common share calculations as the effect of such common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
Options and warrants to purchase 43,291,969 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.25 to $4.00 per share were outstanding at June 30, 2013. Additionally we had restricted stock units of 3,368,247 outstanding at June 30, 2013. Furthermore, the Company had convertible debt that was convertible into 17,900,000 shares of common stock at June 30, 2013. All the above were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.
Note 4 – Stock-based Compensation
In accordance with ASC Topic 718, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the awards, and recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award for awards expected to vest.
Stock Incentive Plans
Under the Broadcast International, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), the board of directors may issue incentive stock options to employees and directors and non-qualified stock options to consultants of the company. Options generally may not be exercised until twelve months after the date granted and expire ten years after being granted. Options granted vest in accordance with the vesting schedule determined by the board of directors, usually ratably over a three-year vesting schedule upon the anniversary date of the grant. Should an employee terminate before the vesting period is completed, the unvested portion of each grant is forfeited. We have used the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate fair value of our stock-based awards, which requires various judgmental assumptions including estimated stock price volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected life. Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility. The number of unissued stock options authorized under the 2004 Plan at June 30, 2013 was 4,290,578.
The Broadcast International, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) has become our primary plan for providing stock-based incentive compensation to our eligible employees and non-employee directors and consultants of the company. The provisions of the 2008 Plan are similar to the 2004 Plan except that the 2008 Plan allows for the grant of share equivalents such as restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, performance shares and restricted stock units in addition to non-qualified and incentive stock options. We continue to maintain and grant awards under our 2004 Plan which will remain in effect until it expires by its terms. The number of unissued shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2008 Plan was 88,200 at June 30, 2013.
Stock Options
We estimate the fair value of stock option awards granted beginning January 1, 2006 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We then amortize the fair value of awards expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the period from the grant date to the end of the vesting period. The Black-Scholes valuation model requires various judgmental assumptions including the estimated volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the stock option award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option award. The expected option term is derived from an analysis of historical experience of similar awards combined with expected future exercise patterns based on several factors including the strike price in relation to the current and expected stock price, the minimum vest period and the remaining contractual period.
The fair values for the options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| |
Six Months Ended June
30, 2012
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
1.82%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
10.0
|
|
Expected volatility
|
77.78%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.37. There were no options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Warrants
We estimate the fair value of issued warrants on the date of issuance as determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model. We amortize the fair value of issued warrants using a vesting schedule based on the terms and conditions of each associated underlying contract, as earned. The Black-Scholes valuation model requires various judgmental assumptions including the estimated volatility, risk-free interest rate and warrant expected exercise term. Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the warrant was issued with a maturity equal to the expected term of the warrant.
The fair values for the warrants issued for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 estimated at the date of issuance using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| |
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
1.32%
|
0.65%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
5.99
|
4.42
|
|
Expected volatility
|
85.65%
|
90.68%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
The weighted average fair value of warrants issued during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $0.27 and $0.05, respectively.
Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 includes $193,585 and $272 respectively, of non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Restricted stock units and options issued to directors vest immediately. All other restricted stock units, options and warrants are subject to applicable vesting schedules. Expense is recognized proportionally as each award or grant vests.
Included in the $193,585 non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 are (i) $31,000 for 100,000 restricted stock units issued to one member of the board, (ii) $1,608 for 30,000 options granted to 2 employees and (iii) $160,977 resulting from the vesting of unexpired options and warrants issued prior to January 1, 2012.
The $272 non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was from the vesting of unexpired options and warrants issued prior to January 1, 2013 which includes is a $2,552 net credit for the three months ended June 30, 2013 related to forfeited employee options.
The impact on our results of operations for recording stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 is as follows:
| |
|
For the three months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
61,098 |
|
|
$ |
(2,552 |
) |
|
$ |
120,228 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
36,322 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
73,357 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
97,420 |
|
|
$ |
(2,552 |
) |
|
$ |
193,585 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
Due to unexercised options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2013, we will recognize an aggregate total of $58,959 of compensation expense over the next two years based upon option and warrant award vesting parameters as shown below:
| |
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
28,334 |
|
|
2014
|
|
|
30,625 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
58,959 |
|
The following unaudited tables summarize option and warrant activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
| |
|
Options
and
Warrants
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
43,396,863 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Warrants issued
|
|
|
850,000 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(448,094 |
) |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(506,800 |
) |
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2013
|
|
|
43,291,969 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2013.
| |
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Contractual
Life (years)
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
| $ |
0.25-0.95 |
|
|
|
40,124,414 |
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
39,957,747 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
| |
1.00-1.59 |
|
|
|
2,823,055 |
|
|
3.12 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
2,803,222 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
| |
2.25-4.00 |
|
|
|
344,500 |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
344,500 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
| $ |
0.25-4.00 |
|
|
|
43,291,969 |
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
43,105,469 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
Restricted Stock Units
The value of restricted stock units is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of the award and compensation expense is recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, 686,667 restricted stock units valued at $51,500 were awarded to five members of our board of directors for services rendered during the year ended 2012. One member of our board of directors settled 258,553 restricted stock units at the conclusion of his board participation during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The value of the units awarded had been expensed as directors fees in the year ended December 31, 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 100,000 restricted stock units were awarded to one member of our board of directors.
The following is a summary of restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
| |
|
Restricted
Stock Units
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
2,940,133 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
Awarded at fair value
|
|
|
686,667 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Settled by issuance of stock
|
|
|
(258,553 |
) |
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2013
|
|
|
3,368,247 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
Vested at June 30, 2013
|
|
|
3,368,247 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Note 5 - Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all cash on hand and in banks, and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had bank balances of $321,023 and $38,847, respectively, in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Current financial market conditions have had the effect of restricting liquidity of cash management investments and have increased the risk of even the most liquid investments and the viability of some financial institutions. We do not believe, however, that these conditions will materially affect our business or our ability to meet our obligations or pursue our business plans.
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when collected.
Included in our $93,379 and $821,608 net accounts receivable for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively, were (i) $132,973 and $856,462 for billed trade receivables, respectively; (ii) $(3,113) and $44,478 of unbilled trade receivables less invoiced unearned revenue (iii) $1,479 and $1,808 for employee travel advances and other receivables, respectively; less (iv) ($37,960) and ($81,140) for allowance for uncollectible accounts, respectively.
The service contract with our largest customer expired May 31, 2013. The revenues from this customer accounted for 87% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Inventories
Inventories consisting of electrical and computer parts are stated at the lower of cost or market determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the property, generally from three to five years. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred except when such repairs significantly add to the useful life or productive capacity of the asset, in which case the repairs are capitalized.
Patents and Intangibles
Patents represent initial legal costs incurred to apply for United States and international patents on the CodecSys technology, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of approximately 20 years. We have filed several patents in the United States and foreign countries. As of March 31, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had approved four patents. Additionally, eleven foreign countries had approved patent rights. While we are unsure whether we can develop the technology in order to obtain the full benefits, the patents themselves hold value and could be sold to companies with more resources to complete the development. On-going legal expenses incurred for patent follow-up have been expensed from July 2005 forward.
Amortization expense recognized on all patents totaled $2,538 and $5,075 for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Estimated amortization expense, if all patents were issued at the beginning of 2013, for each of the next five years is as follows:
|
Year ending
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
11,343 |
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
10,121 |
|
|
2015
|
|
$ |
10,121 |
|
|
2016
|
|
$ |
10,121 |
|
|
2017
|
|
$ |
10,121 |
|
Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets, including patents, annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, then the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Fair value is determined by using cash flow analyses and other market valuations. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 we recorded a $136,621 loss on disposal of assets of which (i) $40,824 was for the abandonment of lease hold improvements related to our move from our 7050 Union Park location, (ii) $25,685 related to the retirement of furniture & fixtures, (iii) $70,112 related to equipment sold or no longer in use.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes prescribed by ASC Topic 740. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when evidence exists that there is an arrangement between us and our customers, delivery of equipment sold or service has occurred, the selling price to our customers is fixed and determinable with required documentation, and collectability is reasonably assured. We recognize as deferred revenue, payments made in advance by customers for services not yet provided.
When we enter into a multi-year contract with a customer to provide installation, network management, satellite transponder and help desk, or combination of these services, we recognize this revenue as services are performed and as equipment is sold. These agreements typically provide for additional fees, as needed, to be charged if on-site visits are required by the customer in order to ensure that each customer location is able to receive network communication. As these on-site visits are performed the associated revenue and cost are recognized in the period the work is completed. If we install, for an additional fee, new or replacement equipment to an immaterial number of new customer locations, and the equipment immediately becomes the property of the customer, the associated revenue and cost are recorded in the period in which the work is completed.
In instances where we have entered into license agreements with a third parties to use our technology within their product offering, we recognize any base or prepaid revenues over the term of the agreement and any per occurrence or periodic usage revenues in the period they are earned.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. We expensed $168,939 and $394,313 of research and development costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. We expensed $464,847 and $1,021,414 of research and development costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable. In the normal course of business, we provide credit terms to our customers. Accordingly, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain allowances for possible losses which, when realized, have been within the range of management’s expectations.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we had the same customer that individually constituted 87% and 86%, respectively of our total revenues.
The service contract with our largest customer expired May 31, 2013. The revenues from this customer accounted for 87% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Note 6 – Notes Payable
The recorded value of our notes payable (net of debt discount) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and year ended December 31, 2012 was as follows:
| |
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 Secured Convertible Notes
|
|
$ |
2,428,166 |
|
|
$ |
3,421,963 |
|
|
Unsecured Convertible Note
|
|
|
673,840 |
|
|
|
840,508 |
|
|
2013 Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
Interest Promissory Note
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,102,006 |
|
|
|
5,032,471 |
|
|
Less Current Portion
|
|
|
(3,102,006 |
) |
|
|
(5,032,471 |
) |
|
Total Long-term
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
2012 Secured Convertible Notes
We engaged Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation to raise funds through the issuance of convertible promissory notes. We anticipated issuing promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to $5,000,000 (“2012 Convertible Debt Offering”). As of June 30, 2013 we have issued notes having an aggregate principal value of $3,475,000 as explained below. The notes were originally due and payable on or before July 13, 2013; however on August 6, 2013, we and the requisite parties executed an amendment of the notes whereby, effective as of July 13, 2013, the maturity date of the notes was extended to October 31, 2013. The notes bear interest at 12% per annum and may convertible to common stock at a $0.25 per share conversion price. We also granted holders of the notes warrants with a five year life to acquire up to 200,000 shares of our common stock for each $100,000 of principal amount of the convertible notes. The notes are secured by all of our assets with the exception of the equipment and receivables secured by the equipment lessor for equipment used in providing services for our largest customer’s digital signage network.
In July 2012, we entered into a note and warrant purchase and security agreement with individual investors and broke escrow on the initial funding under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering, the principal amount of which was $1,900,000, which included the conversion of $900,000 of previously issued short term debt (See Bridge Loan described above) to the 2012 convertible Debt Offering, which extinguished the Bridge Loan. Of the $1,000,000 non-converted principal amount, we realized $923,175 of cash in the initial closing and issued warrants to acquire 3,800,000 shares of our common stock. We paid $76,825 in investment banking fees and costs of the offering.
In August 2012, we continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering by issuing short term debt with a principal amount of $900,000, issued warrants to acquire 1,800,000 shares of our common stock, from which we realized cash of $851,624 after payment of investment banking fees of $48,376.
In December 2012, we continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering by issuing short term debt with a principal amount of $250,000, issued warrants to acquire 500,000 shares of our common stock to one member of our Board of Directors.
In January 2013, we continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering by issuing short term debt with a principal amount of $425,000, issued warrants to acquire 850,000 shares of our common stock to; (i) one member of our Board of Directors, (ii) three individuals and (iii) two companies.
Before June 30, 2013 we received oral assurance that the maturity date of our senior secured convertible notes would be extended to October 31, 2013 and the cumulative effect of that extension has been reflected in our financial statements for the period ending June 30, 2013.
The notes and warrants mentioned above were issued with price protection provisions and were accounted for as derivative liabilities and valued on the dates issued using a Black-Scholes pricing model.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $60,660 as of June 30, 2013, related to the conversion feature of the note. A derivative valuation gain of $28,940 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012. The aggregate derivative liability of $60,660 was calculated as follows using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.04%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 0.34; (iii) expected volatility of 143.51%, (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $237,700 as of June 30, 2013, related to the warrant reset provision. A derivative valuation loss of $11,400 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012. The aggregate derivative liability of $237,700 was calculated as follows using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.57%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 4.10; (iii) expected volatility of 91.86%, (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
The principal value of the secured convertible notes is being accreted over the extended term of the obligation, for which $51,525 and $360,494 was included in interest expense for each the three and six months June 30, 2013, respectively. The notes bear a 12% annual interest rate for which $103,964 and $202,825 was included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
Unsecured Convertible Note
On September 29, 2006, we entered into a letter of understanding with Triage Capital Management, or Triage, dated September 25, 2006. The letter of understanding provided that Triage loan $1,000,000 to us in exchange for us entering into, on or prior to October 30, 2006, a convertible note securities agreement. It was intended that the funding provided by Triage be replaced by a convertible note and accompanying warrants, as described below. Effective November 2, 2006, we entered into securities purchase agreement, a 5% convertible note, a registration rights agreement, and four classes of warrants to purchase our common stock, all of which were with an individual note holder, the controlling owner of Triage, who caused our agreement with Triage to be assigned to him, which satisfied our agreement with Triage.
Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, (i) we sold to the convertible note holder a three-year convertible note in the principal amount of $1,000,000 representing the funding received by us on September 29, 2006; (ii) the convertible note bears an annual interest rate of 5%, payable semi-annually in cash or shares of our common stock; (iii) the convertible note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions ; and (iv) we issued to the convertible note holder four classes of warrants (A Warrants, B Warrants, C Warrants and D Warrants), which give the convertible note holder the right to purchase a total of 5,500,000 shares of our common stock as described below. The A and B Warrants originally expired one year after the effective date of a registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to register the subsequent sale of shares received from exercise of the A and B Warrants. The C Warrants and D Warrants originally expired eighteen months and twenty four months, respectively, after the effective date of a registration statement to be filed under the Securities Act. The A Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.60 per share, the B Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share, the C Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.10 per share, and the D Warrants grant the convertible note holder the right to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the convertible note holder exercised 454,000 A Warrants. We entered into an exchange agreement dated October 31, 2007 in which the convertible note holder received 650,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for cancellation of the C and the D Warrants. The expiration date of the A Warrants and the B Warrants was extended from January 11, 2008 to December 3, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the convertible note holder exercised 64,400 A Warrants. On December 3, 2008, the remaining 231,600 A Warrants and 750,000 B Warrants were unexercised and expired.
On December 23, 2009 we entered into an amendment with the holder of our unsecured convertible note in the principal amount of $1.0 million which (i) extended the note maturity date to December 22, 2010 and (ii) increased the annual rate of interest from 5% to 8% commencing October 16, 2009. All other terms and conditions of the note remain unchanged.
On December 24, 2010 we closed on a Debt Restructuring as mentioned above, In connection with that Debt Restructuring the Company amended the note with the holder of a $1.0 million unsecured convertible note, pursuant to which the maturity date of the note was extended to December 31, 2013. We issued 150,000 shares to the holder of this note as consideration to extend the term of the note.
During March 2011, we issued 135,369 shares of common stock to the holder of our unsecured convertible note in satisfaction of $81,221 of accrued interest on the unsecured convertible note. Also in connection with the satisfaction of the accrued interest we granted to the holder a warrant to acquire up to 221,758 additional shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.96 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time for a five-year period.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $34,600 and $326,400 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the conversion feature of the note. A derivative valuation gain of $11,800 and a derivative valuation loss of $26,400, respectively, was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $34,600 for the conversion feature of the note was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.10%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 0.5; (iii) expected volatility of 143.51%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
In connection with the amendment mentioned above, the principal value of the note is being accreted due to the difference in the value of the conversion feature before and after the amendment. The principal value of $1,000,000 of the unsecured convertible note was accreted over the amended term of the obligation, for which $83,334 and $166,668 was included in interest expense for each the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The note bears an 8% annual interest rate payable semi-annually, and for each the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, $20,000 and $40,000, respectively was included in interest expense.
2013 Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
In April 2013 we entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with one of our directors under the terms of which he agreed to purchase $750,000 of our accounts receivable generated over the next succeeding three months. Because our receivables are no longer in excess of the amount purchased, we have classified our obligation as short term debt in our financial statements.
Interest Promissory Note
On April 17, 2013 we entered into a $20,000 Promissory Note with the holder of our Unsecured Convertible Note for unpaid interest due at that time on the note The Promissory Note is due on December 31, 2013 and contains a 12% annual interest rate.
Senior Unsecured 6.25% Convertible Note
On December 24, 2007, we entered into a securities purchase agreement in which we raised $15,000,000 (less $937,000 of prepaid interest). We used the proceeds from this financing to support our CodecSys commercialization and development and for general working capital purposes. Pursuant to the financing, we issued a senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $15,000,000 (which principal amount has been increased as discussed below).The senior secured convertible note was originally due December 21, 2010, but was amended, restated and extended to December 21, 2013 and was subsequently retired as discussed below.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”), as well as a restructuring of our outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”), resulting in complete satisfaction of our senior indebtedness under the Amended and Restated Note.
A portion of the net proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing was used to close on the 2012 Debt Restructuring. The Company paid $2,750,000 and issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $760,000 in satisfaction of the Amended and Restated Note and remaining interest value of $680,816. In consideration of negotiating the 2012 Debt Restructuring and amending our agreement with our placement agent, we paid $275,041 and issued 586,164 shares of our common stock valued at $222,742 to our placement agent, and recognized a $2,173,033 gain on extinguishment of debt as a result of this retirement.
With the retirement of the Amended and Restated Note we recorded no aggregate derivative liability at June 30, 2012, however at the date of retirement we recorded a derivative valuation gain of $203,700, related to the conversion feature of the Amended and Restated Note to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative from December 31, 2011 to the date of retirement. The derivative value of $81,500 at the date of retirement was recorded as additional paid in capital.
2010 Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreements
During the year ended December 31, 2010 we entered into two Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreements with one individual for an aggregate amount of $775,000. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we remitted $100,000 of the principal balance and converted the remaining $675,000 of principal balance plus accrued and unpaid interest into 1,307,153 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 653,576 shares of our common stock. The warrants contain anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than $1.00 per share. The current exercise price has been reset to $0.725 per share due to subsequent financings.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $7,700 and $50,200 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the warrant reset provision. A derivative valuation loss of $1,800 and a derivative valuation gain of $106,100, respectively, were recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $7,700 was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.66%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 2.7; (iii) expected volatility of 96.68%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
2011 Bridge Loan
On December 28, 2011 we entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase and Security Agreement with seven individuals for an aggregate of $1,300,000 (“Bridge Loan”) to be used as working capital. The note bears an annual interest rate of 18%, payable monthly in cash. Additionally, we granted to the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a five year term to purchase an aggregate of 357,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65. The note was due on February 28, 2012, but the term was subsequently extended to the earlier of the date nine months from the original maturity date or the date we closed on an additional sale of our securities that resulted in gross proceeds to us of $12 million. In consideration of the extension of the maturity date of the Bridge Loan, we granted the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a six year term to purchase 247,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. This note is collateralized by a security interest in all of our accounts receivable
In connection with the Bridge Loan, we paid an $84,500 placement fee and issued warrants to purchase 65,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share and subsequently reset to $0.53, to our investment banker for services in completing the above transaction and paid a $3,000 escrow fee to the Escrow Agent in exchange for holding the funds prior to their disbursement to us.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the associated securities purchase agreement, two of the above described bridge lenders converted the principal balance of their portion of the bridge loan in the amount of $400,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing, reducing the outstanding principal balance to $900,000. The warrants issued had a total value of $222,426 which resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $222,426. The aggregate derivative liability and valuation gain or loss for the warrants issued for the converted portion of the principal balance are included in the aggregate of 2012 Equity Financing information.
All warrants mentioned above were issued with price protection provisions and were accounted for as derivative liabilities and valued using a Black Scholes pricing model.
On July 13, 2012 the $900,000 principal balance was retired and was included as part of the 2012 Convertible Note (as described below) and recorded a (i) $93,661 loss on extinguishment of debt related to the remaining un-accreted portion of the note and (ii) $53,160 expense related to unrecognized offering costs, at the time of retirement.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $8,700 and $46,700 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the reset provision for the original and placement warrants issued. A derivative valuation loss of $1,300 and a derivative valuation gain of $97,000, respectively, were recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $8,700 for the reset provision of the warrants and placement warrants issued was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.85%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 3.5; (iii) expected volatility of 92.74%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $7,700 and $34,700 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the reset provision for the warrants issued for an extension of the maturity date. A derivative valuation loss of $500 and a derivative valuation gain of $61,825, respectively, were recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $7,700 for the reset provision of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.85%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 3.5; (iii) expected volatility of 94.74%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
The principal value of the note was being accreted over the amended term of the obligation, for which $51,848 and $98,968 was included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The note bore an 18% annual interest rate and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $40,389 and $95,130, respectively was included in interest expense
Equipment Purchase and Sale Agreement
In October 2011, we entered into an Equipment Purchase and Sale Agreement with a Utah corporation whereby we use the funds advanced to purchase certain electronic receiving and digital signage equipment along with installation costs. A 3% fee is due each month the amount remains outstanding. At December 31, 2011 we had an outstanding amount owed of $700,000 plus accrued unpaid interest.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the associated securities purchase agreement the above described lender converted the principal balance of its portion of the loan in the amount of $500,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing, the remaining $200,000 principal balance plus $105,000 of interest due was paid in cash. The warrants issued had a total value of $278,032 which resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $278,032. The aggregate derivative liability and valuation gain or loss for the warrants issued for the converted portion of the principal balance are included in the aggregate of 2012 Equity Financing information.
The 3% fee mention above was recorded as interest expense for which $63,000 was included for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Note 7 – Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring
2012 Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring
On March 26, 2012, we closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of our outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”) resulting in complete satisfaction of our senior indebtedness.
We entered into an Engagement Agreement, dated October 28, 2011, with MDB Capital Group, LLC (“MDB”), pursuant to which MDB agreed to act as the exclusive agent of the Company on a “best efforts” basis with respect to the sale of up to a maximum gross consideration of $6,000,000, subsequently verbally increased to $10,000,000, of the Company’s securities, subject to a minimum gross consideration of $3,000,000. The Company agreed to pay to MDB a commission of 10% of the gross offering proceeds received by the Company, to grant to MDB warrants to acquire up to 10% of the shares of our common stock and warrants issued in the financing, and to pay the reasonable costs and expenses of MDB related to the offering.
Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) dated March 23, 2012 with select institutional and other accredited investors for the private placement of 27,800,000 units of our securities. The SPA included a purchase price of $0.25 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and two forms of Warrant: (1) The “A” Warrant grants the investors the right to purchase an additional share of common stock for each two shares of common stock purchased, for a term of six years and at an exercise price of $0.35 per share; and (2) The “B” Warrant will not be exercisable unless and until the occurrence of a future issuance of stock at less than $0.25 per share, but, in the event of such issuance, grants the investors the right to acquire additional shares at a price of $0.05 to reduce the impact of the dilution caused by such issuance, but in no event shall the number of shares to be issued under the B Warrant cause us to exceed the number of authorized shares of common stock. The shares in excess of our authorized shares that would have been issuable under the B Warrant shall be “net settled” by payment of cash in an amount equal to the number of shares in excess of the authorized common shares multiplied by the closing price of our common stock as of the trading day immediately prior to the applicable date of the exercise of such B Warrant. A majority of the holders of the B Warrants agreed in December 2012 to amend the terms of the B Warrant to reduce the amount of subsequent financing required to extinguish the B Warrants with the result that the B Warrants may now be extinguished through notice to the Warrant Holders.
Net proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing, after deducting the commissions and the estimated legal, printing and other costs and expenses related to the financing, were approximately $6.1 million. Coincident to the closing of the 2012 Equity Financing, we also closed on the 2012 Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, the Company paid $2,750,000 to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), and issued to Castlerigg 2,000,000 shares of common stock in full and complete satisfaction of the senior convertible note and all accrued interest. In consideration of negotiating the 2012 Debt Restructuring, we issued to one of our placement agents 586,164 shares of our common stock and paid them $275,041.
In December 2011, we entered into a loan with 7 accredited individuals and entities under the terms of which we borrowed $1,300,000 to be used as working capital (“Bridge Loan”). The Bridge Loan bears an interest rate of 18% per annum and had a maturity date of February 28, 2012, which was subsequently extended to the earlier of the date nine months from the original maturity date or the date we close on an additional sale of our securities that results in gross proceeds to us of $12 million. In consideration of the Bridge Loan we granted to the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a five year term to purchase 357,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share. In consideration of the extension of the maturity date of the Bridge Loan, we granted the holders of the Bridge Loan warrants with a six year term to purchase 247,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share.
In connection with the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the SPA, two of the above described bridge lenders converted the principal balance of their portion of the bridge loan in the amount of $400,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing. In addition, one other entity converted the amount owed by us for equipment purchases in the amount of $500,000 to common stock and warrants as part of and on the same terms as the 2012 Equity Financing. The proceeds from these conversions were treated as funds raised with respect to the financing.
In connection with the 2012 Equity Financing and under the terms of the SPA, the Company agreed to prepare and file, within 60 days following the issuance of the securities, a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock sold in the financing and the shares of common stock underlying the Warrants. The Company filed the registration statement on April 9, 2012 and it was declared effective on August 1, 2012.
On April 5, 2012 we secured an additional $154,000 from 1 company and 4 individuals (three of which are members of our Board of Directors) on the same terms and conditions as the investors of the 2012 Equity Financing. As a result of this funding we issued 616,000 shares of our common stock and A warrants totaling 400,400 of which 308,000 were issued to investors and 92,400 were issued to our investment banker.
All warrants listed below were issued with price protection provisions and were accounted for as derivative liabilities. The A Warrants were valued using the Black Scholes pricing model and the B Warrants were valued using the Geometric Brownian Motion methodology with a risk neutral Monte Carlo approach.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Common
Shares
Issued
|
|
|
Number of
A Warrants
|
|
|
Value of A
Warrants
|
|
|
Value of
B
Warrants
|
|
|
Total
Warrant
Value
|
|
|
Investors
|
|
|
24,816,000 |
|
|
|
12,408,000 |
|
|
$ |
487,095 |
|
|
$ |
39,387 |
|
|
$ |
526,482 |
|
|
Bridge Loan Conversion
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
31,405 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
33,944 |
|
|
Equipment Finance Conversion
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
39,257 |
|
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
42,431 |
|
|
Agency
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,262,400 |
|
|
|
167,327 |
|
|
|
13,531 |
|
|
|
180,858 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,416,000 |
|
|
|
18,470,400 |
|
|
$ |
725,084 |
|
|
$ |
58,631 |
|
|
$ |
783,715 |
|
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $783,715 and $3,101,537 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the reset feature of the A warrants and the B warrants mentioned above. A derivative valuation loss of $26,246 and a derivative valuation gain of $1,659,855 were recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability from December 31, 2012 and the time the warrants were first issued, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $783,715 was calculated as follows: (1) $725,084 for the reset feature of the A warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 1.41%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 4.7; (iii) expected volatility of 91.50%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08 and (2) $58,631 for the B warrants using the Geometric Brownian Motion methodology with a risk neutral Monte Carlo approach.
2010 Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring
On December 24, 2010, we closed on an equity financing (the “Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of our then outstanding convertible indebtedness (the “Debt Restructuring”). The Equity Financing and the Debt Restructuring are described as follows.
We entered into a Placement Agency Agreement, dated December 17, 2010, with Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation (“PBC”), pursuant to which PBC agreed to act as the exclusive agent of the Company on a “best efforts” basis with respect to the sale of up to a maximum gross consideration of $15,000,000 of units of the Company’s securities, subject to a minimum gross consideration of $10,000,000. The units consisted of two shares of our common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of our common stock. The Company agreed to pay PBC a commission of 8% of the gross offering proceeds received by the Company, to issue PBC 40,000 shares of its common stock for each $1,000,000 raised, and to pay the reasonable costs and expenses of PBC related to the offering. The Company also agreed to pay PBC a restructuring fee in the amount of approximately $180,000 upon the closing of the Equity Financing and the simultaneous Debt Restructuring.
Pursuant to the Placement Agency Agreement, we entered into Subscription Agreements dated December 23, 2010 with select institutional and other accredited investors for the private placement of 12,500,000 units of our securities. The Subscription Agreements included a purchase price of $1.20 per unit, with each unit consisting of two shares of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock. The warrants have a term of five years and had an exercise price of $1.00 per share which was reset to $0.78 pursuant to the 2012 Equity Financing.
Net proceeds from the Equity Financing, after deducting the commissions and debt restructuring fees payable to PBC and the estimated legal, printing and other costs and expenses related to the financing, were approximately $13.5 million. We used a portion of the net proceeds of the Equity Financing to pay down debt and the remainder was used for working capital.
On November 29, 2010, we entered into a bridge loan transaction with three accredited investors pursuant to which we issued unsecured notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0 million. Upon the closing of the Equity Financing, the lenders converted the entire principal amount plus accrued interest into the same units offered in the Equity Financing and the proceeds from the bridge loan transaction were treated as funds raised with respect to the financing.
In connection with the Equity Financing and under the terms of the Subscription Agreements, the Company agreed to prepare and file, and did file, within 60 days following the issuance of the securities, a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock sold in the financing and the shares of common stock underlying the warrants. The registration statement was declared effective June 16, 2011 satisfying the obligation contained in the Subscription Agreements.
On December 24, 2010, we also closed on the Debt Restructuring. In connection therewith, we (i) issued an Amended and Restated Senior Convertible Note in the principal amount of $5.5 million (the “Amended and Restated Note”) to Castlerigg Master Investment Ltd. (“Castlerigg”), (ii) paid $2.5 million in cash to Castlerigg, (iii) cancelled warrants previously issued to Castlerigg that were exercisable for a total of 5,208,333 shares of common stock, (iv) issued 800,000 shares of common stock to Castlerigg in satisfaction of an obligation under a prior loan amendment, (v) entered into the Letter Agreement pursuant to which we paid Castlerigg an additional $2.75 million in cash in lieu of the issuance of $3.5 million in stock and warrants as provided in the loan restructuring agreement under which the Amended and Restated Note and other documents were issued (the “Loan Restructuring Agreement”), and (vi) entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with Castlerigg dated December 23, 2010. As a result of the foregoing, Castlerigg forgave approximately $7.2 million of principal and accrued but unpaid interest.
The Amended and Restated Note, dated December 23, 2010, was a senior, unsecured note that matured in three years from the closing and bore interest at an annual rate of 6.25%, payable semi-annually. We paid the first year’s interest of $350,434 at the closing. The Amended and Restated Note was convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.35 per share, subject to adjustment. The Amended and Restated Note was convertible in whole or in part at any time upon notice by Castlerigg to us. The Amended and Restated Note also contained various restrictions, acceleration provisions and other standard and customary terms and conditions. Two of our consolidated subsidiaries guaranteed our obligations under the Amended and Restated Note.
The Investor Rights Agreement provides Castlerigg with certain registration rights with respect to the Company’s securities held by Castlerigg. These registration rights include an obligation of the Company to issue additional warrants to Castlerigg if certain registration deadlines or conditions are not satisfied. The agreement also contains full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than the conversion price described above.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued Castlerigg 400,000 warrants pursuant to a waiver agreement dated March 10, 2011 allowing the issuance of shares and warrants for the conversion of the AR Note Payable without adjusting the conversion price of the Amended and Restated Senior 6.25% Convertible Note. These warrants contain full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provisions in the event the Company issues stock or convertible debt with a purchase price or conversion price less than the conversion price described above and were accounted for as embedded derivatives and valued on the transaction date using a Black Scholes pricing model. During the three and six months ended June 30 ,2011 the warrant holder exercised these warrants using a cashless provision resulting in the company issuing 372,272 shares of our common stock. A valuation gain of $144,000 was recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative from the time of issue to the date of conversion.
In connection with the Debt Restructuring, the Company amended the note with the holder of a $1.0 million unsecured convertible note, pursuant to which the maturity date of the note was extended to December 31, 2013. We also issued 150,000 shares and 75,000 warrants to acquire our common stock at $.90 per share to the holder of this note as consideration to extend the term of the note.
On March 26, 2012, we closed on an equity financing (the “2012 Equity Financing”) as well as a restructuring of our outstanding senior convertible indebtedness (the “2012 Debt Restructuring”) resulting in complete satisfaction our senior indebtedness.
A portion of the net proceeds from the 2012 Equity Financing was used to close on the 2012 Debt Restructuring therewith. The Company paid $2,750,000 and issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $760,000 to Castlerigg in satisfaction of the $5,500,000 senior convertible note and $680,816 of accrued interest.
Investor warrants totaling 12,499,980 issued under the Subscription Agreements contain price protection adjustments in the event we issue new common stock or common stock equivalents in certain transactions at a price less than $1.00 per share and were accounted for as embedded derivatives and valued on the transaction date using a Black Scholes pricing model. The exercise price has been reset to $0.7312 per share due to subsequent financings.
We recorded an aggregate derivative liability of $134,500 and $750,000 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the reset feature of the warrants issued under the Placement Agency Agreement. A derivative valuation loss of $25,100 and derivative valuation gain $2,125,000, respectively, were recorded to reflect the change in value of the aggregate derivative liability since December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate derivative liability of $134,500 for the conversion feature of the note was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate 0.51%, (ii) expected life (in years) of 2.5; (iii) expected volatility of 98.23%; (iv) expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and (v) stock trading price of $0.08.
Note 8 – Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2013, we had cash of $686,347, total current assets of $877,438, total current liabilities of $7,968,941 and total stockholders' deficit of $6,736,801. Included in current liabilities is $1,275,275 related to the value of the embedded derivatives for our senior secured convertible notes, our unsecured convertible note, and warrants issued in connection with our 2012 Equity Financing and notes. All of our notes mature within the next six months and must either be refinanced or otherwise retired. We do not have the liquidity to do so nor do we have the ability to raise additional equity to retire the notes.
Cash used in operations during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $1,052,472 compared to cash used in operations for the six months June 30, 2012 of $1,773,339. Although the net cash used in operations decreased it was primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable of $763,461 and a decrease in accounts payable of $246,738. The negative cash flow was sustained by cash reserves from the issuance of our senior secured convertible notes and the sales of our accounts receivable to a related party, which has been treated as debt in our financial statements. We expect to continue to experience negative operating cash flow until we consummate the merger with AllDigital or until we secure additional customers that replace the revenue no longer realized from our former largest customer.
We initiated discussions with various of our accounts payable vendors to settle some of our accounts payable for less than face value in exchange for a payment in cash and/or issuance of common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2013 we entered into agreements to discount our payables by approximately $962,630 through the payment of cash and/or issuance of stock and return of equipment to a vendor. We paid cash of $66,646, issued 2,240,852 shares of our common stock valued at $153,860 from which we recognized a $414,484 gain from the reduction of these company obligations. At June 30, 2013 our accounts payable included $76,409 which we owed to vendors as part of these settlements. Additionally, we returned equipment to a vendor for which we had been invoiced $327,640.
In April 2013 we entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with one of our directors under the terms of which he agreed to purchase $750,000 of our accounts receivable generated over the next succeeding three months.
The current recession and market conditions have had substantial impacts on the global and national economies and financial markets. These factors, together with soft credit markets, have slowed business growth and generally made potential funding sources more difficult to access. We continue to be affected by prevailing economic and market conditions, which present considerable risks and challenges to it.
Because we have not been successful in deploying our CodecSys technology with customers sufficient to achieve a breakeven and are finding it difficult to raise additional investment capital, we determined that we should seek an alternative to continuing to commercialize CodecSys by ourselves. Accordingly we sought a merger partner that has compatible video broadcasting products and services, with which we could integrate our CodecSys encoding system. In January 2013 we entered into a Merger Agreement with AllDigital, Inc., a Nevada corporation. The merger is subject among other things to normal due diligence, approval of the shareholders of both companies, and the filing and effectiveness of a registration statement. The registration statement requires year-end financial statements be included with the proxy statements furnished to the shareholders and will not be effective until at least the third quarter of 2013. On February 8, 2013, AllDigital notified us that we were in breach of certain covenants regarding unencumbered ownership or potential claims against our technology, which gave us 30 days to cure the alleged defects before the merger agreement could be terminated. On March 8, 2013 AllDigital notified us that sufficient progress had been made that the cure period was extended to April 8, 2013 and later to May 8, 2013 for the remainder of the alleged defects to be cured or waived. On April 10, 2013, the parties entered into an amendment to the Merger Agreement which provides that either party may (i) terminate the Merger Agreement upon 3 days notice, with or without cause, without liability, (ii) eliminates the cure period date requirement and (iii) that the “No Shop” provision preventing us from contacting other potential purchasers or merger partners was removed. On June 30, 2013, we entered into a second amendment to the Merger Agreement which (i) increases the percentage of our outstanding common stock AllDigital’s shareholders would receive in the merger from 54% to 58%, (i) modifies a number of the closing conditions of the merger, including the working capital and net cash flow require, (iii) adds a new closing condition that we have post-merger financing commitments in place for the purchase of no less than $1.5 million, nor more than $3.5 million, of our common stock, (iv) extends the “end date” (a date upon which either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the merger has not been consummated) from July 31, 2013 to October 31, 2013, (v) eliminates one of our existing directors from the post-closing board of directors such that the post-closing directors are expected to be Donald A. Harris, Paul Summers, David Williams and up to two additional directors mutually approved by us and AllDigital prior to the closing of the merger and (vi) changes the reverse stock split ratio from a 10 to 1 reverse stock split to a 15 to 1 reverse stock split. On July 9, 2013, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-189869) with the SEC in connection with the anticipated merger.
To fund operations, we engaged our investment banker to raise funds through the issuance of convertible promissory notes. We anticipate issuing promissory notes with a principal amount of up to $5,000,000 (“2012 Convertible Debt Offering”) due and payable on or before July 13, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, we had issued notes with an aggregate principal value of $3,475,000 as explained below. The notes bear interest at 12% per annum and may be convertible to common stock at a $0.25 per share conversion price. We also granted holders of the notes warrants with a five year life to acquire up to 200,000 shares of our common stock for each $100,000 of principal amount of the convertible notes. The notes are secured by all of our assets. On July 13, 2012, we entered into a note and warrant purchase and security agreement with individual investors and broke escrow on the initial funding under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering, the principal amount of which was $1,900,000, which included the conversion of $900,000 of previously issued short term debt (See Bridge Loan described below) to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering, which extinguished the Bridge Loan. We realized $923,175 of cash in the initial closing, issued warrants to acquire 3,800,000 shares of our common stock and paid $76,825 in investment banking fees and costs of the offering. We have continued sales of convertible debt under the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering and as of March 31, 2013 have issued additional short term debt with a principal amount of $1,575,000, from which we realized cash of $1,526,624 after payment of investment banking fees of $48,376. We have, however, paid no investment banking fees on sales of our 2012 Convertible Debt Offering since August 2012 and do not anticipate paying additional investment banking fees for the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering. We have issued warrants to acquire a total of 6,950,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering. On August 6, 2013, we and the requisite parties executed an amendment of the notes issued pursuant to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering whereby, effective as of July 13, 2013, the maturity date of the notes was extended to October 31, 2013.
Our monthly operating expenses, since our expense reductions including that for CodecSys technology research and development expenses, no longer exceeds our monthly net sales. However, at the end of May when our largest customer contract expired our revenues have been significantly reduced to the point where if we do not locate new customers our ability to continue without additional adjustments and expense reductions will be negatively impacted. The foregoing estimates, expectations and forward-looking statements are subject to change as we make strategic operating decisions from time to time and as our expenses and sales fluctuate from period to period.
The amount of our operating deficit could decrease or increase significantly depending on strategic and other operating decisions, thereby affecting our need for additional capital. We expect that our operating expenses will continue to outpace our net sales until we are able to generate additional revenue. Our business model contemplates that sources of additional revenue include (i) sales from private communication network services, (ii) sales resulting from new customer contracts, and (iii) sales, licensing fees and/or royalties related to commercial applications of CodecSys technology, and (iv) operational efficiencies to be obtained through the merger will AllDigital.
Our long-term liquidity is dependent upon execution of our business model and the realization of additional revenue and working capital as described above, and upon capital needed for continued commercialization and development of the CodecSys technology. Commercialization and future applications of the CodecSys technology are expected to require additional capital for the foreseeable future. The amount required will be determined based on specific opportunities and available funding.
To date, we have met our working capital needs primarily through funds received from sales of common stock and from convertible debt financings. Until our operations become profitable, we will continue to rely on proceeds received from external funding. We expect additional investment capital may come from (i) the exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase capital stock currently held by existing warrant holders; (ii) additional private placements of common stock with existing and new investors; and (iii) the private placement of other securities with institutional investors similar to those institutions that have provided funding in the past.
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements
The Company has certain financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-tier fair value hierarchy has been established which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). These tiers include:
|
·
|
Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
|
|
·
|
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
|
|
·
|
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
We measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows at June 30, 2013:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative valuation (1)
|
|
$ |
1,275,275 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
1,275,275 |
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$ |
1,275,275 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
1,275,275 |
|
|
(1) See Notes 6 & 7 for additional discussion.
|
|
The table below presents our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at June 30, 2013. We classify financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model.
| |
|
Derivative
|
|
| |
|
Valuation
|
|
| |
|
Liability
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
$ |
(1,191,269 |
) |
|
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net loss
|
|
|
(25,606 |
) |
|
Valuation adjustment
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(58,400 |
) |
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2013
|
|
$ |
(1,275,275 |
) |
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of our accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their immediate or short-term maturities. The aggregate carrying amount of the notes payable approximates fair value as the individual notes bear interest at market interest rates and there has not been a significant change in our operations and risk profile.
Note 10 – Equipment Financing
On August 27, 2009, we completed an equipment lease financing transaction with a financial institution. Pursuant to the financing, we entered into various material agreements with the financial institution. These agreements are identified and summarized below.
We entered into a Master Lease Agreement dated as of July 28, 2009 with the financial institution pursuant to which we sold to the financing institution certain telecommunications equipment to be installed at 1,981 (subsequent additional locations have increased the customer’s network to an aggregate of approximately 2,100 locations) of our customer’s retail locations in exchange for a one-time payment of $4,100,670 by the financial institution. We paid to the financial institution 36 monthly lease payments of approximately $144,000 plus applicable sales taxes. We had the right to terminate the lease after making 33 payments for a termination fee of the higher of approximately 10% of the original equipment value (approximately $410,000) or the then “in-place fair market value” after which payment we would own all of the equipment. We gave timely notice of exercise of this option. We are currently a party to a lawsuit to determine if the “in-place fair market value” exceeds the 10% of the original lease value and by what amount. We contend that the three payments made subsequent to the notice exercising our right to purchase constitute full payment for the equipment. The equipment broker contends that we owe an additional amount. Our accounting records reflect that the capital lease has been retired and the equipment has been fully depreciated.
During the year ended December 31, 2012 we included in our lease payments approximately $422,100 toward the in place fair market value. Additionally during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the five months ended May 31, 2013 we made payments of $140,700 and $284,400, respectively, into an escrow account held by the court pending resolution of our dispute.
On June 13, 2013 this matter was settled resulting in a $370,000 payment to the plaintiff which had previously been deposited in escrow with the Court. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 we recorded this expense as part of our cost of sales as it was related to the equipment used by one of our customers.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we made lease payments totaling approximately $422,096 and $844,191 of which $402,614 and $791,195 was applied toward the outstanding lease with $19,482 and $52,996, respectively, included in interest expense. Additionally, we recognized amortization of the lease acquisition fee of $12,567 and $25,134 which was included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
Note 11 – Interact Devices Inc. (IDI)
We began investing in and advancing monies to IDI in 2001. IDI was developing technology which became an initial part of the CodecSys technology.
On October 23, 2003, IDI filed for Chapter 11 Federal Bankruptcy protection. We desired that the underlying patent process proceed and that the development of CodecSys technology continue. Therefore, we participated in IDI’s plan of reorganization, whereby we would satisfy the debts of the creditors and obtained certain licensing rights. On May 18, 2004, the debtor-in-possession’s plan of reorganization for IDI was confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court. As a result of this confirmation, we issued to the creditors of IDI shares of our common stock and cash in exchange for approximately 50,127,218 shares of the common stock of IDI. Since May 18, 2004, we have acquired additional common share equivalents IDI. As of June 30, 2013, we owned approximately 55,897,169 IDI common share equivalents, representing approximately 94% of the total outstanding IDI share equivalents
Since May 18, 2004, we have advanced additional cash to IDI for the payment of operating expenses, which continues development and marketing of the CodecSys technology. As of June 30, 2013 we have advanced an aggregate amount of $3,393,149, pursuant to a promissory note that is secured by assets and technology of IDI.
Note 12 – Employment Amendment and Settlement Agreements
Pursuant to the January 6, 2013 Amendment and Settlement Agreement with each of Mr. Tiede, Mr. Solomon, and a Senior Vice President their respective employment agreements were modified and we agreed to issue each individual 529,100 shares of common stock if they were terminated by us at any time following January 6, 2013. All other termination benefits and severance were terminated as of January 6, 2013. We had an obligation as of March 6, 2013 to issue to each of them 529,100 shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2013 these shares had not been issued, however an aggregate of $60,481 has been accrued representing the value of the benefits which will be exchanged for the shares.
Note 13 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) – Parents Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. This Update indicates that when the reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity, the parent is required to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. This should be done if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. Partial sale guidance for an equity method investment that is a foreign entity still applies resulting in a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment being released to net income upon a partial sale of the equity method investment. This Update is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 for public companies and after December 15, 2014 for non-public companies. The Company doesn’t expect this Update to significantly impact its financials since it does not have any foreign entities. However, the guidance will be applied if it does occur.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405) – Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The Update requires a company to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date as the sum of the following: 1) The amount the entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and 2) Any additional amount the entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. This Update is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 for public companies and after December 15, 2014 for non-public companies. The Company doesn’t expect this Update to impact its financials since it does not have any obligations from joint and several liability arrangements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The main purpose of this Update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Update requires that the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income be reported on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified in its entirety to net income. For those items not reclassified in its entirety to net income, a cross-reference to other disclosures providing information about those amounts. Furthermore, information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income must be shown by component. This Update is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 for public companies and after December 15, 2013 for non-public companies. The Company doesn’t expect this Update to impact its financials since it does not have any comprehensive income items. However, if any are noted in the future, the appropriate disclosures will be incorporated.
.
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The main purpose of this Update is to clarify that the disclosures regarding offsetting assets and liabilities per ASU 2011-11 apply to derivatives including embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are offset or subject to a master netting agreement. Other types of transactions are not impacted. This Update is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and for all interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company doesn’t expect this Update to impact the Company’s financials since it does not have instruments noted in the Update that are offset.
Note 14 – Supplemental Cash Flow Information
2013
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 we issued 458,553 shares of our common stock to one former member of our board of directors for services rendered of which (i) 258,553 was for the settlement of previously awarded restricted stock units and (ii) 200,000 valued at $15,000 for unpaid services rendered in 2012, which had been expensed and included in our accounts payable at December 31, 2012.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 we issued an aggregate of 60,000 shares of our common stock valued at $4,200 to six individuals for services rendered.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 we awarded 686,667 restricted stock units issued valued at $51,500 to four members of our board of directors for services rendered in 2012. The value of these awards had been expensed and included in our Accounts Payable at December 31, 2012.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 we recorded a $136,621 loss on disposal of assets of which (i) $40,824 was for the abandonment of lease hold improvements related to our move from our 7050 Union Park location, (ii) $25,685 related to the retirement of furniture & fixtures, (iii) $70,112 related to equipment sold or no longer in use. Additionally, we received cash proceeds net of costs from these sales of $75,423.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 we recorded a $414,474 gain on extinguishment of debt resulting from the issuance of 2,240,852 shares of our common stock valued at $153,860 and the payment of $137,865 in cash, of which $66,646 had been paid at June 30, 2013, to 19 of our accounts payable vendors.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 an aggregate non-cash expense of $527,162 was recorded for the accretion of notes payable as follows: (i) $166,668 for our unsecured convertible note and (ii) $360,494 for our 2012 secured convertible notes.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $151,047 in depreciation and amortization expense from the following: (i) $1,167 related to cost of sales for equipment used directly by or for customers, (ii) $144,805 related to other property and equipment, and (iii) $5,075 for patent amortization.
2012
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock valued at $137,500 to one consultant in consideration for cancellation of a warrant issued for consulting services rendered.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012 an aggregate non-cash expense of $265,636 was recorded for the accretion of notes payable as follows: (i) $166,668 for the unsecured convertible note and (ii) $98,968 for the Bridge Loan.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $723,194 in depreciation and amortization expense from the following: (i) $396,520 related to cost of sales for equipment used directly by or for customers, (ii) $321,599 related to other property and equipment, and (iii) $5,075 for patent amortization.
Note 15 – Subsequent Events
On August 6, 2013, we and the requisite parties executed an amendment of the notes issued pursuant to the 2012 Convertible Debt Offering whereby, effective as of July 13, 2013, the maturity date of the notes was extended to October 31, 2013.
On August 8, 2013, we entered into a consent to convert accounts receivable agreement with one of our directors whereby he agreed to accept a convertible promissory note in a principal amount of $750,000 in full satisfaction of our obligations to him under an accounts receivable purchase agreement between us and him. The note bears interest of 12% per annum, is due October 31, 2013 and is convertible into shares of our common stock at a rate of $0.25 per share at the option of the holder.
We evaluated subsequent events pursuant to ASC Topic 855 and have determined that there are no additional events that need to be reported.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (ALLDIGITAL)
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
AF-2
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
|
AF-3
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011
|
AF-4
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012
and December 31, 2011
|
AF-5
|
| |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
AF-7
|
| |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
AF-8
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013
|
AF-19
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements for Operations for the three and six months ending
June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013
|
AF-20
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ending
June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013
|
AF-21
|
| |
|
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
AF-22
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
AllDigital Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AllDigital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AllDigital Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP
Encino, California
March 28, 2013
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
462,761 |
|
|
$ |
998,853 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $0 and $0
|
|
|
122,064 |
|
|
|
109,556 |
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,680 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
53,362 |
|
|
|
38,999 |
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
638,187 |
|
|
|
1,159,088 |
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
80,311 |
|
|
|
88,467 |
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
Intangibles – domain name
|
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
749,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,269,969 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
520,308 |
|
|
$ |
289,302 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
347,773 |
|
|
|
212,781 |
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
868,081 |
|
|
|
502,083 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none and none issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 90,000,000 shares
authorized, 25,440,728 and 25,390,728 issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
25,441 |
|
|
|
25,391 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,277,132 |
|
|
|
1,990,528 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(2,421,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,248,033 |
) |
|
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(118,669 |
) |
|
|
767,886 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
(deficit)
|
|
$ |
749,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,269,969 |
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
|
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,307,167 |
|
|
$ |
2,852,350 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,486,388 |
|
|
|
1,702,670 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
820,779 |
|
|
|
1,149,680 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing, and advertising
|
|
|
600,789 |
|
|
|
267,637 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,587,445 |
|
|
|
1,164,941 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,188,234 |
|
|
|
1,432,578 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,367,455 |
) |
|
|
(282,898 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(26,070 |
) |
|
Organization costs writeoff
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(790,840 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
195,521 |
|
|
|
- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
196,646 |
|
|
|
(815,978 |
) |
|
Loss from continuing operations before
provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,170,809 |
) |
|
|
(1,098,876 |
) |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,173,209 |
) |
|
|
(1,101,276 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(1,173,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,096,276 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted net loss from continuing
operations per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
Net income from discontinued operations
per share
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
25,405,892 |
|
|
|
21,148,125 |
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| |
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(1,173,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,096,276 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net profit (loss) to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
40,812 |
|
|
|
18,527 |
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
271,604 |
|
|
|
132,154 |
|
|
Warrants issued for services
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
33,150 |
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
34,072 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Stock and warrants issued for services
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
790,840 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(46,580 |
) |
|
|
(66,998 |
) |
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
11,680 |
|
|
|
86,994 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(14,363 |
) |
|
|
(27,943 |
) |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,164 |
) |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
134,992 |
|
|
|
69,658 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
231,006 |
|
|
|
199,424 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
|
|
(507,436 |
) |
|
|
149,066 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(32,656 |
) |
|
|
(101,522 |
) |
|
Payment for intangible – domain name
|
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Cash received in acquisition
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(41,156 |
) |
|
|
(99,844 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable – bridge
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
481,650 |
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
681,650 |
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
|
|
(536,092 |
) |
|
|
730,872 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents – beginning of period
|
|
|
998,853 |
|
|
|
267,981 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents – end of year
|
|
$ |
462,761 |
|
|
$ |
998,853 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into the following noncash transactions:
|
|
·
|
Issued 15,000 warrants for services valued at $2,550.
|
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, the Company entered into the following noncash transactions:
|
|
·
|
Issued 210,000 warrants for services valued at $33,150.
|
|
|
·
|
Converted $500,000 in bridge notes payable and $28,582 in accrued interest into 2,114,332 shares of common stock and 1,057,166 warrants.
|
|
|
·
|
Converted $10,700 in a note payable into 42,800 shares of common stock and 21,400 warrants.
|
|
|
·
|
Converted $10,000 in accrued expenses into 40,000 shares of common stock and 20,000 warrants.
|
|
|
·
|
Recorded $790,840 in organization costs in the Aftermarket Merger.
|
|
|
·
|
Converted $47,500 in accrued expenses into 190,000 shares of common stock and 95,000 warrants.
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
| |
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE – December 31, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(151,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(148,757 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for conversion of pre-
merger Aftermarket Enterprises shares,
$0.001 per share
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,076,996 |
|
|
|
18,077 |
|
|
|
751,105 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
769,182 |
|
|
Shares issued for conversion of bridge
notes and accrued interest, $0.25 per
share
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,114,332 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
526,468 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
528,582 |
|
|
Shares issued in private placement,
$0.25 share
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,926,600 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
479,723 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
481,650 |
|
|
Conversion of accrued expenses to officer, $0.25 per share
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
47,310 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
47,500 |
|
|
Conversion of note payable, $0.25 per
share
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
42,800 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
Shares issued for services, $0.25 per
share
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
9,960 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
Warrants issued for services
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
33,150 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
33,150 |
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
132,155 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
132,155 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,096,276 |
) |
|
|
(1,096,276 |
) |
|
BALANCE – December 31, 2011
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
25,390,728 |
|
|
$ |
25,391 |
|
|
$ |
1,990,528 |
|
|
$ |
(1,248,033 |
) |
|
$ |
767,886 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for services
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
Shares issued for exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
12,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
271,604 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
271,604 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,173,209 |
) |
|
|
(1,173,209 |
) |
|
BALANCE – December 31, 2012
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
25,440,728 |
|
|
$ |
25,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,277,132 |
|
|
$ |
(2,421,242 |
) |
|
$ |
(118,669 |
) |
The number of shares have been retroactively restated to present the pre-merger equity of AllDigital, Inc., using the capital structure of AllDigital Holdings, Inc.
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
AllDigital, Inc. (“AllDigital”) was incorporated in the State of California on August 3, 2009, with the primary purpose of providing digital broadcasting solutions dedicated to managing the complex pairing of cloud-based digital media and digital services with Internet-connected devices.
Our digital broadcasting solutions consist of the technology and services required to develop, operate and support a variety of complex Digital Service and Digital Broadcasting Workflow implementations across a diverse market of Devices. We accomplish this by enabling, and maximizing the performance of, the cloud-based storage, processing and transit of digital media and digital services to multiple devices simultaneously. Our business model targets a variety of entities and existing providers of Digital Services that need to develop, operate and support a cost-effective, high quality and secure Digital Service, through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow, across a large and diverse market of Devices.
Our ability to successfully generate future revenues is dependent on a number of factors, including: (i) the availability of capital to continue to develop, operate and maintain our proprietary AllDigital Cloud platform and services, (ii) the ability to commercialize our portfolio of digital broadcasting solutions to media and entertainment companies, enterprises, government agencies, and non profits, and (iii) our ability to attract and retain key sales, business and product development, and other personnel as our business and offerings continue to mature. We may encounter setbacks related to these activities.
In November 2010, AllDigital commenced an offering of up to $500,000 in convertible promissory notes (“the Notes”) in a bridge financing in order to raise funds primarily to pay the legal, audit and other transaction costs directly related to a merger (the "Aftermarket Merger") with Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. (“Aftermarket”), a fully reporting company quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (but not actively traded). Following consummation of the Aftermarket Merger, AllDigital’s shareholders held a majority of the outstanding capital stock of Aftermarket. In connection with the Aftermarket Merger, Aftermarket (which was the surviving company in the Aftermarket Merger and subsequently renamed AllDigital Holdings, Inc.), also conducted an offering to raise a minimum of $1,000,000 in aggregate proceeds (including the Notes). As of December 31, 2011, AllDigital raised $500,000 in Notes through the bridge financing (See Note 5). On July 29, 2011, the Aftermarket Merger was consummated and Aftermarket acquired all of the assets and operations of AllDigital (See Note 11), including the conversion of the $500,000 in Notes plus accrued interest.
Effective August 25, 2011, the name of Aftermarket was changed to AllDigital Holdings, Inc (together with AllDigital, “we,” “us” or “the Company”). Immediately following closing of the Aftermarket Merger, Aftermarket had two business lines: AllDigital’s digital services business and Aftermarket’s automotive accessories business. On September 27, 2011, the Company sold the automotive accessories business to the former president of Aftermarket.
Although from a legal perspective, Aftermarket acquired AllDigital in the Aftermarket Merger, from an accounting perspective, the Aftermarket Merger is viewed as a reverse acquisition whereby AllDigital acquired the assets of Aftermarket. The transaction is equivalent to the issuance of common stock by AllDigital for the net assets of Aftermarket. The Aftermarket Merger is viewed as a reverse acquisition because post-Merger AllDigital’s shareholders own approximately 73% of the outstanding shares of Aftermarket, AllDigital’s directors and officers now serve as the directors and officers of the Company, and the operations of AllDigital is the ongoing business of the Company. The statement of stockholders’ equity (deficit) has been restated to retroactively reflect the number of shares of AllDigital, using the capital structure of Aftermarket and to present the accumulated deficit of AllDigital as of the date of the Aftermarket Merger. The value of the consideration transferred in the Aftermarket Merger ($769,182) was determined using the guidance of ASC 805-40-30. Amounts acquired by the Company were comprised of $1,700 cash and the assumption of $23,270 of liabilities. The Company determined that the value of the intangible assets identified and unidentified was $0. As such, the Company recorded a charge of $790,840 to its consolidated statement of operations relating to the reverse acquisition because the value of the consideration in excess of the value of the assets acquired was akin to organization costs.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The use of estimates may also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates made by management include, among others, estimates of costs used in the calculation of percentage of completion contracts, realization of capitalized assets, valuation of equity instruments and other instruments indexed to the Company’s common stock, and deferred income tax valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Following are discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of the Company's assets and the satisfaction of its liabilities in the normal course of conducting its business. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability or classification of assets and liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company has to date incurred recurring losses and has accumulated losses aggregating approximately $2.4 million as of December 31, 2012. The Company's business strategy includes attempting to increase its revenue through investing further in its product development and sales and marketing efforts, and expanding into international markets. The Company intends to finance this portion of its business strategy by using its current working capital resources and cash flows from operations. Management believes its cash flows from operations, together with its liquid assets will be sufficient to fund ongoing operations through at least December 31, 2013. The Company's business strategy also includes the possibility of engaging in strategic acquisitions or otherwise taking steps to more rapidly increase its growth rates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AllDigital, Inc. that are consolidated in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). AllDigital, Inc. is wholly-owned by AllDigital Holdings, Inc. There are no intercompany transactions as all accounts are in the name of AllDigital, Inc.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes recurring and nonrecurring service revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition, including guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. In general, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Revenue from certain design and development contracts, where a solution is designed, developed or modified to a customer’s specifications, is recognized on a percentage of completion basis in accordance with ASC 605-35 based on the cost-to-cost method, provided such costs can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s revenue recognition practices related to such contracts include: developing an approved budget; comparing actual period costs to the budget as a percentage; recognizing revenue for the period based upon the percentage of actual costs incurred compared to total estimated costs, and; performing monthly budget-actual reviews, updates, and adjustments as needed. The impact on revenues as a result of these revisions is included in the periods in which the revisions are made. For contracts for which the Company is unable to reasonably estimate total contract costs, the Company waits until contract completion to recognize the associated revenue.
Nonrecurring revenues also include “on-boarding” professional services that involve the development or integration of a customer’s software application, digital service, system, or Application Programming Interface (“API”) to connect with the AllDigital platform. On-boarding professional services projects are typically of a short duration and smaller revenue amounts. The Company recognizes revenue for on-boarding professional services upon project completion and acceptance.
Monthly recurring revenues are recognized ratably over the period in which they are delivered and earned. The Company typically charges monthly recurring platform fees, as well as monthly recurring charges for our back-end storage, cloud processing, origin transit, and maintenance and support services. These fees are generally billed based on a minimum commitment plus actual usage basis, and the term of such customer contracts vary typically from 12 to 24 months.
Rarely, a customer contract will include revenue arrangements that consist of multiple product and service deliverables. Such contracts are accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-25, as amended by ASU 2009-13. For the Company’s multiple-element arrangements, deliverables are separated into more than one unit of accounting when (i) the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially in the control of the Company. Revenue is then allocated to each unit of accounting based on the estimated selling price determined using a hierarchy of evidence based first on Vendor-Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”) if it exists, based next on Third-Party Evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE does not exist, and finally, if both VSOE and TPE do not exist, based on the Company’s best estimate of selling price (“BESP”). If deliverables cannot be separated into more than one unit, then the Company does not recognize revenue until all deliverables have been delivered and accepted.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded at their face amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s best estimate of probable losses in the accounts receivable balance. Management determines the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience, and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011. The Company generally requires a deposit or advance services payments from its customers for certain contracts involving upfront capital investment, on-boarding, or development contracts to facilitate its working capital needs.
Earnings and Loss per Share
The Company computes net earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260-10 that establishes standards for computing and presenting net earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.
At December 31, 2012, the Company had 3,892,274 warrants and 2,070,597 options that could potentially dilute the number of shares outstanding. At December 31, 2011, the Company had 3,892,274 warrants and 670,139 options that could potentially dilute the number of shares outstanding. These instruments were excluded from the computation of the diluted loss per share as their impact is anti-dilutive.
Fair Value of Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
|
Level Input:
|
|
Input Definition:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
|
| |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level I, that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
|
| |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
|
Assets subject to this classification at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, were cash and cash equivalents and are considered Level 1 assets.
For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying amount of the Company’s notes payable approximates fair value based on prevailing interest rates.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the estimated future tax effects, calculated at the tax rate expected to be in effect at the time of realization. We record a valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.
ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. We classify interest and penalties as a component of interest and other expenses. To date, we have not been assessed, nor have we paid, any interest or penalties.
The Company follows guidance issued by the FASB with regard to its accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements. Such guidance prescribes a recognition threshold of more likely than not and a measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In making this assessment, a company must determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, based solely on the technical merits of the position and must assume that the tax position will be examined by taxing authorities.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance of equipment are charged to expense as incurred. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
5 years
|
|
Computer equipment
|
3 years
|
|
Software
|
3 years
|
|
Signs
|
3 years
|
Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the results of operations when realized.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for long-lived assets, that include property and equipment and identifiable intangible assets with infinite useful lives, in accordance with FASB ASC 350-30, that requires that the Company review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company may not recover the carrying amount of an asset. The Company measures recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the expected future undiscounted net cash flows generated by the asset. If the Company determines that the asset may not be recoverable, the Company recognizes an impairment charge to the extent of the difference between the asset’s fair value and the asset’s carrying amount. The Company recorded $790,840 in organization costs writeoff related to the Aftermarket Merger during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The Company had no other impairment charges during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, and had no impairment charges during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC 718, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to be based on estimated fair values. We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of our stock options at the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of subjective assumptions to calculate the value of stock options. We use historical data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which amended the guidance in ASU 2011-08 to simplify the testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill for impairment. ASU 2012-02 becomes effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning on or after September 15, 2012 and earlier adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this guidance to have any impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this update require enhanced disclosures around financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2012. The Company does not expect this guidance to have any impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”), which amends the guidance in ASC 350-20, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other – Goodwill. ASU 2011-08 provides entities with the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit when testing goodwill for impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is determined, based on qualitative factors, to be more likely than not less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit, the entities are required to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2011-04”), which amended ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), providing a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and expands the disclosure requirements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment as of December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, consisted of the following:
| |
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
$ |
11,618 |
|
|
$ |
5,451 |
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
80,771 |
|
|
|
56,332 |
|
|
Signs
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Software
|
|
|
45,833 |
|
|
|
45,833 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(59,961 |
) |
|
|
(19,149 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
80,311 |
|
|
$ |
88,467 |
|
NOTE 4 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, consisted of the following:
| |
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
252,793 |
|
|
$ |
108,222 |
|
|
Accrued personnel costs
|
|
|
155,243 |
|
|
|
170,365 |
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
45,847 |
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
66,425 |
|
|
|
4,111 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
520,308 |
|
|
$ |
289,302 |
|
NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable – bridge financing, related and unrelated parties
In November 2010, the Company commenced an offering of up to $500,000 in Notes in a bridge financing in order to raise funds primarily to pay the legal, audit and other transaction costs directly related to the Aftermarket Merger, and to address certain of the Company’s short-term working capital needs. At the holder’s option, the Notes were convertible into common stock of Aftermarket on the same terms as the simultaneous offering conducted by Aftermarket. The Notes bore interest at 10% per annum, and if not converted, would have had a one-year term. On July 29, 2011, the Company successfully completed the proposed merger and related offering, which included the conversion of the $500,000 in Notes into the units of common stock and warrants offered in the offering. (See Note 7).
NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
On August 28, 2009, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of office space at 2821 McGaw Avenue, Irvine, California, 92614, which was used as corporate offices. The lease commenced on September 15, 2009, and terminated on December 31, 2011, as the Company moved into another facility owned by the same landlord. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, monthly rent paid was $3,826. Rent expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $128,997 and $47,154, respectively.
On October 10, 2011, the Company entered into a five-year Lease Agreement for the lease of office space at 220 Technology Suite 100, Irvine, California, 92618, which is used as corporate offices effective January 1, 2012. The lease commenced on January 1, 2012, and terminates on December 31, 2016. On November 18, 2011, the lease of office space at 220 Technology Drive Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618 was modified from a five year term to a three year term. All other terms of the October 10, 2011, lease agreement remain the same. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, monthly rent paid will be $10,297 in year one, $10,504 in year two, and $10,717 in year three.
Effective May 1, 2011, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of computer servers. The lease amount is $423 per month.
Effective June 1, 2011, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of computer servers. The lease amount is $892 per month.
Effective October 4, 2011, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of computer servers. The lease amount is $902 per month.
Effective December 21, 2011, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of a phone system. The lease amount is $940 per month.
Effective February 4, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of computer servers. The lease amount is $767 per month.
Effective May 4, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of computer servers. The lease amount is $921 per month.
Effective October 15, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year Lease Agreement for the lease of computer servers. The lease amount is $334 per month.
Future minimum lease payments under operating leases at December 31, 2012 are:
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
188,207 |
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
222,009 |
|
|
2015
|
|
$ |
8,006 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
418,222 |
|
Legal Matters
The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings in the normal conduct of its business. In the opinion of management, the disposition of all such proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue Preferred Stock in one or more series and to, within the limits set forth by Nevada law and without shareholder action:
|
|
·
|
designate in whole or in part, the powers, preferences, limitations, and relative rights, of any class of shares before the issuance of any shares of that class;
|
|
|
·
|
create one or more series within a class of shares, fix the number of shares of each such series, and designate, in whole or part, the powers, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the series, all before the issuance of any shares of that series;
|
|
|
·
|
alter or revoke the powers, preferences, limitations, and relative rights granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued class of shares or any wholly unissued series of any class of shares; or
|
|
|
·
|
increase or decrease the number of shares constituting any series, the number of shares of which was originally fixed by the Board of Directors, either before or after the issuance of shares of the series; provided that, the number may not be decreased below the number of shares of the series then outstanding, or increased above the total number of authorized shares of the applicable class of shares available for designation as a part of the series.
|
The issuance of Preferred Stock by our Board of Directors could adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock. The potential issuance of Preferred Stock may:
|
|
·
|
Have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company;
|
|
|
·
|
Discourage bids for the common stock at a premium over the market price of the common stock; and
|
|
|
·
|
Adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
|
Common Stock
In July 2011, the Company converted 30,000,000 shares of outstanding $0.0001 par value common stock to 18,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock in relation to the Aftermarket Merger. Aftermarket had 3,076,996 shares of common stock as of date of the Aftermarket Merger. 190,000 shares of common stock were issued in July 2011 to an officer in payment of an accrued liability to the officer. $500,000 in Notes and $28,582 in related accrued interest expense were converted to 1,057,166 units in the offering (the “Units”), consisting of 2,114,332 shares of common stock and 1,057,166 warrants, in July 2011 in connection with the offering (See Note 5). 963,300 Units, consisting of 1,926,600 shares of common stock and 963,300 warrants, were issued in July 2011 in the offering for $481,650 cash in connection with the Aftermarket Merger (see Note 12). 40,000 shares of common stock along with 20,000 warrants were issued in August 2011 for outside services of $10,000. 42,800 shares of common stock along with 21,400 warrants were issued in September 2011 to the former president of Aftermarket in payment of a note payable of $10,700. 50,000 shares of common stock were issued in September 2012 upon the exercise of stock options.
Stock Options
On July 28, 2011, AllDigital adopted, and in the Aftermarket Merger, the Company assumed the 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for directors, employees, consultants and other persons acting on behalf of the Company, under which 4,500,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance. Options granted under the Plan vest on the date of grant, over a fixed period of time, or upon the occurrence of certain events and have a contractual term of up to ten years. Effective January 3, 2012, a majority of shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized from 4,500,000 to 8,500,000.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 1,101,000 options under the Plan to certain employees, 50,000 options were exercised, and 791,000 options were forfeited by employees who resigned from the Company. At December 31, 2012, there were 4,610,000 total options outstanding.
As of December 31, 2012, there were 3,840,000 shares of common stock available for grant under the Plan.
A summary of the status of the options granted is as follows:
| |
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise price
|
|
|
Average
remaining
contractual term -
years
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
9.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
4,350,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
9.63 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,101,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
9.32 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(50,000 |
)5 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
9.63 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(791,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
4,610,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
8.70 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Exercisable:
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
2,070,597 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
- |
|
At December 31, 2012, 2,070,597 options had vested and 2,539,403 options are expected to vested.
As of December 31, 2012, there was $498,028 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.44 years. The total fair value of options vested during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was $257,760. The aggregate intrinsic value of the options expected to vest in the future was $579,727.
Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $271,604 and $132,154, respectively.
The fair value of the options granted by AllDigital Holdings, Inc., for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is estimated at $446,550 and $730,838, respectively.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The determination of the fair value of each stock option is affected by our stock price on the date of grant, as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. The assumptions used to value stock options are as follows:
| |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.49% to 2.00%
|
|
|
|
1.88% to 2.98%
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
196%
|
|
|
|
196%
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6 – 6.5
|
|
|
|
6 – 6.5
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per share of options
granted
|
|
|
$0.41
|
|
|
|
$0.17
|
|
The dividend yield is zero as the Company currently does not pay a dividend.
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury bond.
Volatility is estimated based on comparable companies in the industry.
Warrants
In July 2011, the Company issued 963,300 warrants as part of the Units sold in a $481,650 offering. In July 2011, the Company issued 1,057,166 warrants as part of the Units in conversion of $500,000 of Notes and $28,582 related accrued interest expense. In July 2011, the Company issued 95,000 warrants to an officer as part of the Units as payment for $47,500 accrued expenses. In July 2011, the Company issued 60,000 warrants to a consultant as part of a payment for an accrued expense. In July 2011, the Company issued 45,000 warrants to a consultant as part of a payment for an accrued expense. In August 2011, the Company issued 20,000 warrants to a consultant as part of a payment for $10,000 of accrued expenses. In August 2011, the Company issued 45,000 warrants to a consultant as part of a payment for an accrued expense. In September 2011, the Company issued 21,400 warrants to the former owner of Aftermarket as part of a payment for a $10,700 note payable. In September 2011, the Company issued 45,000 warrants to a consultant as part of a payment for an accrued expense. In October 2011, the Company issued 1,525,408 warrants to the pre-merger Aftermarket Enterprises stockholders. In October 2011, the Company issued 15,000 warrants to a consultant as part of a payment for an accrued expense. As of December 31, 2012, no warrants had been exercised, and all warrants were outstanding.
A summary of the status of the warrants granted is as follows:
| |
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2011
|
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2012
|
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable – December 31, 2012
|
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding at December 31, 2012:
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Range of
exercise
prices
|
|
Number of
warrants
outstanding
|
|
Weighted-average
remaining contractual
life (in years)
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
|
|
Number of
warrants
exercisable
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
|
|
$0.25
|
|
150,000
|
|
3.66
|
|
$0.25
|
|
150,000
|
|
$0.25
|
|
$0.275
|
|
60,000
|
|
3.58
|
|
$0.275
|
|
60,000
|
|
$0.275
|
|
$0.50
|
|
3,682,274
|
|
1.68
|
|
$0.50
|
|
3,682,274
|
|
$0.50
|
|
$0.25 - $0.50
|
|
3,892,274
|
|
1.78
|
|
$0.49
|
|
3,892,274
|
|
$0.49
|
NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES
The components of the income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
| |
|
December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 differed from the amounts computed applying the federal statutory rate of 34% to pre-tax income as a result of:
| |
|
December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed "expected" tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(398,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(369,000)
|
|
|
Income taxes resulting from expenses not deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
92,300
|
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
Org cost impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
269,000
|
|
|
Change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets net of return to
provision adjustment
|
|
|
301,600
|
|
|
|
53,600
|
|
|
State and local income taxes, net of tax benefit
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities for federal income taxes at December 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted of the following:
| |
|
December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
30,400
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
18,100
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(49,200
|
)
|
|
|
(68,500)
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
-
|
|
|
$ |
-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
$
|
542,000
|
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(40,000)
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(542,300
|
)
|
|
|
(170,000
|
)
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the Company’s recorded net deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company must take into account all positive and negative evidence with regard to the utilization of a deferred tax asset. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets totaled approximately $591,500 and $238,500, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the increase in the valuation allowance was $353,000.
The Company plans to continue to provide a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until it can sustain an appropriate level of profitability and until such time, the Company would not expect to recognize any significant tax benefits in its future results of operations.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $1,376,000 and $1,270,000, respectively, which expire through 2032. The utilization of net operating loss carryforwards may be limited under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions due to a change in ownership.
The Company has not recognized any liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company expects any resolution of unrecognized tax benefits, if created, would occur while the full valuation allowance of deferred tax assets is maintained; therefore the Company does not expect to have any unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no accrual for the payment of interest or penalties. All years for which income tax returns have been prepared are subject to examination.
NOTE 9 - CONCENTRATIONS
Major Customers
At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, three and four customers accounted for 82% and 98% of the outstanding accounts receivable, respectively.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, three and three customers accounted for 67% and 74% of total revenue, respectively.
Major Vendors
At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, four and four vendors accounted for 85% and 87% of the outstanding accounts payable, respectively.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, four and two vendors accounted for 75% and 53% of total purchases, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that may subject the Company to credit risk include uninsured cash-in-bank balances. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions located in Southern California. From time to time, such balances exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to its cash balances. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s uninsured cash was $100,423.
NOTE 10 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company currently operates in one business segment, digital broadcasting solutions. All fixed assets are located at the Company’s headquarters and data centers located in the United States. All sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, were in the United States and Canada.
NOTE 11 - SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS
Reverse Merger
On December 29, 2010, the Company entered into, and on April 29, 2011, subsequently agreed to extend, a Letter of Intent with Aftermarket, a fully reporting company quoted (but not actively traded) on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, pursuant to which Aftermarket planned to acquire AllDigital in a reverse merger transaction. If the Aftermarket Merger were consummated, the Company’s stockholders would hold a majority of the outstanding capital stock of Aftermarket following the closing. In connection with the proposed Merger, Aftermarket, which would subsequently be renamed AllDigital Holdings, Inc., also conducted an offering to raise a minimum of $1,000,000 in aggregate proceeds, including those from the Notes (see Notes 5 and 7). On July 29, 2011, the Company successfully completed the proposed Merger and related offering in which Aftermarket acquired all of the assets and operations of AllDigital, Inc. Effective August 25, 2011, the name of Aftermarket was changed to AllDigital Holdings, Inc. As of the date of the Aftermarket Merger, the Company had two business lines: AllDigital’s digital broadcasting solutions business and Aftermarket’s automotive accessories business. On September 27, 2011, the Company paid $3,769 in connection with the sale of the automotive accessories business to the former president of Aftermarket, who assumed $9,494 in liabilities and $857 in receivables. AllDigital Holdings, Inc. recognized $4,868 as a gain on the sale and recognized discontinued operations related to the operations of the automotive business in September 2011. The Company recognized $132 in profit in discontinued operations from the month of July through September August 2011.
NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTIES
During the years 2010 and 2011, $475,000 in Notes were issued by the Company to two of the Company’s shareholders, who also serve as officers at the Company, an employee, and friends and family members of such shareholders (See Note 5). The Notes were converted to stock and warrants on July 29, 2011.
NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 2, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 132,000 options to employees.
On January 6, 2013, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Broadcast Merger Agreement”) with Broadcast International, Inc., a Utah corporation (“Broadcast International”) and Alta Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast International (“Merger Sub”). Assuming conditions to closing are satisfied, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Company, and Company will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast International (the “Broadcast Merger”). On February 6, 2013, after having conducted further due diligence, AllDigital provided written notice of its belief that certain material representations and warranties in the Broadcast Merger Agreement were inaccurate when made. In the notice, AllDigital also identified its requirements for curing these alleged inaccuracies and notified Broadcast International that if such alleged inaccuracies are not cured or otherwise resolve within thirty (30) days of such notice, or if it earlier becomes apparent that such alleged inaccuracies cannot be cured, AllDigital may terminate the Broadcast Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. Broadcast International and AllDigital have been working together on the issues identified in the such notice. In light of progress made to date related to these issues, on March 6, 2013, AllDigital provided written notice to Broadcast International that it was extending the cure period identified in the Initial Notice to April 7, 2013.
On January 15, 2013, the Company issued 4,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of options.
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
June 30, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
912,400
|
|
|
$
|
462,761
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $0 and $0
|
|
|
107,728
|
|
|
|
122,064
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
55,641
|
|
|
|
53,362
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,075,769
|
|
|
|
638,187
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
97,811
|
|
|
|
80,311
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
11,164
|
|
|
|
11,164
|
|
|
Intangibles – domain names
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,204,494
|
|
|
$
|
749,412
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
603,099
|
|
|
$
|
520,308
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
861,791
|
|
|
|
347,773
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,464,890
|
|
|
|
868,081
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none and none issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 90,000,000 shares
authorized, 25,444,728 and 25,440,728 issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
25,445
|
|
|
|
25,441
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,364,811
|
|
|
|
2,277,132
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(2,650,652
|
)
|
|
|
(2,421,242
|
)
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
(260,396
|
)
|
|
|
(118,669
|
)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
1,204,494
|
|
|
$
|
749,412
|
|
See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
| |
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
| |
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,026,187
|
|
|
$
|
646,427
|
|
|
$
|
2,038,294
|
|
|
$
|
1,598,276
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
607,792
|
|
|
|
599,696
|
|
|
|
1,217,977
|
|
|
|
1,242,975
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
418,395
|
|
|
|
46,731
|
|
|
|
820,317
|
|
|
|
355,301
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing, and
advertising
|
|
|
99,741
|
|
|
|
201,054
|
|
|
|
215,841
|
|
|
|
387,533
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
440,900
|
|
|
|
359,415
|
|
|
|
900,023
|
|
|
|
828,910
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
540,641
|
|
|
|
560,469
|
|
|
|
1,115,864
|
|
|
|
1,216,443
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(122,246
|
)
|
|
|
(513,738
|
)
|
|
|
(295,547
|
)
|
|
|
(861,142
|
)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
66,653
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
Total other income
(expense)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
66,937
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before
provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(122,121
|
)
|
|
|
(512,895
|
)
|
|
|
(228,610
|
)
|
|
|
(859,854
|
)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(122,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
(512,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
(229,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(862,254
|
)
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per
share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted-
average shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,444,728
|
|
|
|
25,390,728
|
|
|
|
25,444,419
|
|
|
|
25,390,728
|
|
See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
| |
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(229,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(862,254
|
)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,944
|
|
|
|
19,033
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
86,684
|
|
|
|
106,639
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,072
|
|
|
Warrants issued for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
14,335
|
|
|
|
(56,042
|
)
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,680
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(2,279
|
)
|
|
|
(62,096
|
)
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
514,018
|
|
|
|
170,672
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
82,791
|
|
|
|
284,217
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
|
|
490,083
|
|
|
|
(351,529
|
)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(41,444
|
)
|
|
|
(26,760
|
)
|
|
Payment for intangible - domain name
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,500
|
)
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(41,444
|
)
|
|
|
(35,260
|
)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
|
|
449,639
|
|
|
|
(386,789
|
)
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents – beginning of period
|
|
|
462,761
|
|
|
|
998,853
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents – end of period
|
|
$
|
912,400
|
|
|
$
|
612,064
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
ALLDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
AllDigital, Inc. was incorporated in the State of California on August 3, 2009, with the primary purpose of providing digital broadcasting solutions dedicated to managing the complex pairing of cloud-based digital media and digital services with Internet-connected devices. AllDigital, Inc. merged with and into a subsidiary of Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. (now known as AllDigital Holdings, Inc.) on July 29, 2011 (the “Aftermarket Merger”), and the business of Aftermarket was immediately terminated. References to the “Company”, forms of “we” and “AllDigital” in this Report generally refer to AllDigital Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including AllDigital, Inc..
Our digital broadcasting solutions consist of the technology and services required to develop, operate and support a variety of complex Digital Service and Digital Broadcasting Workflow implementations across a diverse market of Devices. We accomplish this by enabling, and maximizing the performance of, the cloud-based storage, processing and transit of digital media and digital services to multiple devices simultaneously. Our business model targets a variety of entities and existing providers of Digital Services that need to develop, operate and support a cost-effective, high quality and secure Digital Service, through a Digital Broadcasting Workflow, across a large and diverse market of Devices.
Our ability to successfully generate future revenues is dependent on a number of factors, including: (i) the availability of capital to continue to develop, operate and maintain our proprietary AllDigital Cloud platform and services, (ii) the ability to commercialize our portfolio of digital broadcasting solutions to media and entertainment companies, enterprises, government agencies, and non profits, and (iii) our ability to attract and retain key sales, business and product development, and other personnel as our business and offerings continue to mature. We may encounter setbacks related to these activities.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The use of estimates may also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates made by management include, among others, estimates of costs used in the calculation of percentage of completion contracts, realization of capitalized assets, valuation of equity instruments and other instruments indexed to the Company’s common stock, and deferred income tax valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Following are discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of the Company's assets and the satisfaction of its liabilities in the normal course of conducting its business. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability or classification of assets and liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company has to date incurred recurring losses and has accumulated losses aggregating approximately $2.7 million as of June 30, 2013. The Company's business strategy includes attempting to increase its revenue through investing further in its product development and sales and marketing efforts, and expanding into international markets. The Company intends to finance this portion of its business strategy by using its current working capital resources and cash flows from operations. Management believes its cash flows from operations, together with its liquid assets will be sufficient to fund ongoing operations through at least June 30, 2014. The Company's business strategy also includes the possibility of engaging in strategic acquisitions or otherwise taking steps to more rapidly increase its growth rates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AllDigital, Inc. that are consolidated in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). AllDigital, Inc. is wholly-owned by AllDigital Holdings, Inc. There are no intercompany transactions as all accounts are in the name of AllDigital, Inc.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes recurring and nonrecurring service revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition, including guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. In general, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Revenue from certain design and development contracts, where a solution is designed, developed or modified to a customer’s specifications, is recognized on a percentage of completion basis in accordance with ASC 605-35 based on the cost-to-cost method, provided such costs can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s revenue recognition practices related to such contracts include: developing an approved budget; comparing actual period costs to the budget as a percentage; recognizing revenue for the period based upon the percentage of actual costs incurred compared to total estimated costs, and; performing monthly budget-actual reviews, updates, and adjustments as needed. The impact on revenues as a result of these revisions is included in the periods in which the revisions are made. For contracts for which the Company is unable to reasonably estimate total contract costs, the Company waits until contract completion to recognize the associated revenue.
Nonrecurring revenues also include “on-boarding” professional services that involve the development or integration of a customer’s software application, digital service, system, or Application Programming Interface (“API”) to connect with the AllDigital platform. On-boarding professional services projects are typically of a short duration and smaller revenue amounts. The Company recognizes revenue for on-boarding professional services upon project completion and acceptance.
Monthly recurring revenues are recognized ratably over the period in which they are delivered and earned. The Company typically charges monthly recurring platform fees, as well as monthly recurring charges for our back-end storage, cloud processing, origin transit, and maintenance and support services. These fees are generally billed based on a minimum commitment plus actual usage basis, and the term of such customer contracts vary typically from 12 to 24 months.
Rarely, a customer contract will include revenue arrangements that consist of multiple product and service deliverables. Such contracts are accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-25. For the Company’s multiple-element arrangements, deliverables are separated into more than one unit of accounting when (i) the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially in the control of the Company. Revenue is then allocated to each unit of accounting based on the estimated selling price determined using a hierarchy of evidence based first on Vendor-Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”) if it exists, based next on Third-Party Evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE does not exist, and finally, if both VSOE and TPE do not exist, based on the Company’s best estimate of selling price (“BESP”). If deliverables cannot be separated into more than one unit, then the Company does not recognize revenue until all deliverables have been delivered and accepted.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded at their face amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s best estimate of probable losses in the accounts receivable balance. Management determines the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience, and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company generally requires a deposit or advance services payments from its customers for certain contracts involving upfront capital investment, on-boarding, or development contracts to facilitate its working capital needs.
Earnings and Loss per Share
The Company computes net earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260-10 that establishes standards for computing and presenting net earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.
At June 30, 2013, the Company had 3,892,274 warrants and 2,547,431 options that could potentially dilute the number of shares outstanding. At June 30, 2012, the Company had 3,892,274 warrants and 1,024,306 options that could potentially dilute the number of shares outstanding. These instruments were excluded from the computation of the diluted loss per share as their impact is anti-dilutive.
Fair Value of Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
|
Level Input:
|
|
Input Definition:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
|
| |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level I, that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
|
| |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
|
Assets subject to this classification at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, were cash and cash equivalents and are considered Level 1 assets.
For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying amount of the Company’s notes payable approximates fair value based on prevailing interest rates.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the estimated future tax effects, calculated at the tax rate expected to be in effect at the time of realization. We record a valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.
ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. We classify interest and penalties as a component of interest and other expenses. To date, we have not been assessed, nor have we paid, any interest or penalties.
The Company follows guidance issued by the FASB with regard to its accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements. Such guidance prescribes a recognition threshold of more likely than not and a measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In making this assessment, a company must determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, based solely on the technical merits of the position and must assume that the tax position will be examined by taxing authorities.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance of equipment are charged to expense as incurred. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
5 years
|
|
Computer equipment
|
3 years
|
|
Software
|
3 years
|
|
Signs
|
3 years
|
Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the results of operations when realized.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for long-lived assets, that include property and equipment and identifiable intangible assets with infinite useful lives, in accordance with FASB ASC 350-30, that requires that the Company review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company may not recover the carrying amount of an asset. The Company measures recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the expected future undiscounted net cash flows generated by the asset. If the Company determines that the asset may not be recoverable, the Company recognizes an impairment charge to the extent of the difference between the asset’s fair value and the asset’s carrying amount. The Company had no impairment charges during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC 718, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to be based on estimated fair values. We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of our stock options at the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of subjective assumptions to calculate the value of stock options. We use historical data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which amended the guidance in ASU 2011-08 to simplify the testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill for impairment. ASU 2012-02 becomes effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning on or after September 15, 2012 and earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this update require enhanced disclosures around financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:
| |
|
June 30, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
$ |
11,618 |
|
|
$ |
11,618 |
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
122,215 |
|
|
|
80,771 |
|
|
Software
|
|
|
45,833 |
|
|
|
45,833 |
|
|
Signs
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(83,905 |
) |
|
|
(59,961 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
97,811 |
|
|
$ |
80,311 |
|
NOTE 4 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:
| |
|
June 30, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
294,624 |
|
|
$ |
252,793 |
|
|
Accrued personnel costs
|
|
|
222,261 |
|
|
|
155,243 |
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
30,976 |
|
|
|
45,847 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
55,238 |
|
|
|
66,425 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
603,099 |
|
|
$ |
520,308 |
|
NOTE 5 - LEASE OBLIGATIONS
On October 10, 2011, the Company entered into a five-year Lease Agreement for the lease of office space at 220 Technology Suite 100, Irvine, California, 92618, which is used as corporate offices effective January 1, 2012. The lease commenced on January 1, 2012, and terminates on December 31, 2016. On November 18, 2011, the lease of office space at 220 Technology Drive Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618 was modified from a five year term to a three year term. All other terms of the October 10, 2011, lease agreement remain the same. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, monthly rent paid will be $10,297 in year one, $10,504 in year two, and $10,717 in year three. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $96,296 and $91,306, respectively.
The Company has entered into the following leases:
|
Effective Date
|
Term
|
Purpose
|
Monthly lease
|
| |
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2011
|
Three years
|
Computer servers
|
$423
|
|
June 1, 2011
|
Three years
|
Computer servers
|
$892
|
|
October 4, 2011
|
Three years
|
Computer servers
|
$902
|
|
December 21, 2011
|
Three years
|
Phone system
|
$940
|
|
February 14, 2012
|
Three years
|
Computer servers
|
$767
|
|
May 4, 2012
|
Three years
|
Computer servers
|
$921
|
|
October 15, 2012
|
Three years
|
Computer servers
|
$334
|
Future minimum lease payments under operating leases at June 30, 2013 are:
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
187,748
|
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
135,202
|
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
1,168
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
324,118
|
|
NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue Preferred Stock in one or more series and to, within the limits set forth by Nevada law and without shareholder action:
|
|
·
|
designate in whole or in part, the powers, preferences, limitations, and relative rights, of any class of shares before the issuance of any shares of that class;
|
|
|
·
|
create one or more series within a class of shares, fix the number of shares of each such series, and designate, in whole or part, the powers, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the series, all before the issuance of any shares of that series;
|
|
|
·
|
alter or revoke the powers, preferences, limitations, and relative rights granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued class of shares or any wholly unissued series of any class of shares; or
|
|
|
·
|
increase or decrease the number of shares constituting any series, the number of shares of which was originally fixed by the Board of Directors, either before or after the issuance of shares of the series; provided that, the number may not be decreased below the number of shares of the series then outstanding, or increased above the total number of authorized shares of the applicable class of shares available for designation as a part of the series.
|
The issuance of Preferred Stock by our Board of Directors could adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock. The potential issuance of Preferred Stock may:
|
|
·
|
have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company;
|
|
|
·
|
discourage bids for the common stock at a premium over the market price of the common stock; and
|
|
|
·
|
adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
|
Common Stock
50,000 shares of common stock were issued in September 2012 upon the exercise of stock options. 4,000 shares of common stock were issued in January 2013 upon the exercise of stock options.
Stock Options
On July 28, 2011, AllDigital adopted, and in the Aftermarket Merger, the Company assumed the 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for directors, employees, consultants and other persons acting on behalf of the Company, under which 4,500,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance. Options granted under the Plan vest on the date of grant, over a fixed period of time, or upon the occurrence of certain events and have a contractual term of up to ten years. Effective January 3, 2012, a majority of shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized from 4,500,000 to 8,500,000.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 1,720,000 options under the Plan to certain employees, 4,000 options were exercised, and 366,000 options were forfeited by employees who resigned from the Company. At June 30, 2013, there were 5,960,000 total options outstanding. In relation to 1,200,000 options of the 1,720,000 issued, two officers have agreed to give back to the Company 1,200,000 shares of common stock so that there will be no dilutive effect to the Company. Such shares have not been returned to the Company as of the date of this report.
As of June 30, 2013, there were 2,486,000 shares of common stock available for grant under the Plan.
A summary of the status of the options granted is as follows:
| |
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise price
|
|
|
Average
remaining
contractual
term - years
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
4,610,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
8.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,720,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
9.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(366,000 |
) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Outstanding,
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
5,960,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
8.69 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Exercisable:
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
2,547,431 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
8.16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
At June 30, 2013, 2,547,431 options had vested and 3,412,569 options are expected to vest in the future.
As of June 30, 2013, there was $556,022 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.40 years. The total fair value of options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $109,834. The aggregate intrinsic value of the options expected to vest in the future was $0.
Stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $86,684 and $106,639, respectively.
The fair value of the options granted by AllDigital Holdings, Inc., for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is estimated at $241,370 and $378,550, respectively.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The determination of the fair value of each stock option is affected by our stock price on the date of grant, as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. The assumptions used to value stock options are as follows:
| |
|
Period Ended
|
|
| |
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.76% to 2.65%
|
|
|
1.49% to 2.00%
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
196%
|
|
|
196%
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
6 – 6.5
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per share of
options granted
|
|
$0.13
|
|
|
$0.41
|
|
The dividend yield is zero as the Company currently does not pay a dividend.
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury bond.
Volatility is estimated based on comparable companies in the industry.
Warrants
A summary of the status of the warrants granted is as follows:
| |
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2012
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$0.49 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Outstanding – June 30, 2013
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$0.49 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable – June 30, 2013
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$0.49 |
|
The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding at June 30, 2013:
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Range of
exercise
prices
|
|
|
Number of
warrants
outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-average
remaining contractual
life (in years)
|
|
|
Weighted-
average exercise
price
|
|
|
Number of
warrants
exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted-
average exercise
price
|
|
| $0.25 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
$0.25 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$0.25 |
|
| $0.275 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
$0.275 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
$0.275 |
|
| $0.50 |
|
|
|
3,682,274 |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
$0.50 |
|
|
|
3,682,274 |
|
|
$0.50 |
|
| $0.25 - $0.50 |
|
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
$0.49 |
|
|
|
3,892,274 |
|
|
$0.49 |
|
NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES
The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the Company’s recorded net deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company must take into account all positive and negative evidence with regard to the utilization of a deferred tax asset. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets totaled approximately $616,000 and $591,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the increase in the valuation allowance was $25,000.
The Company plans to continue to provide a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until it can sustain an appropriate level of profitability and until such time, the Company would not expect to recognize any significant tax benefits in its future results of operations.
As of June 30, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, which expire through 2033. The utilization of net operating loss carryforwards may be limited under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions due to a change in ownership.
The Company has not recognized any liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company expects any resolution of unrecognized tax benefits, if created, would occur while the full valuation allowance of deferred tax assets is maintained; therefore the Company does not expect to have any unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no accrual for the payment of interest or penalties. All years for which income tax returns have been prepared are subject to examination.
NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS
Major Customers
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, three and three customers accounted for 93% and 82% of the outstanding accounts receivable, respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, four and two customers accounted for 90% and 50% of total revenue, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, four and three customers accounted for 81% and 68% of total revenue, respectively.
Major Vendors
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, two and four vendors accounted for 84% and 85% of the outstanding accounts payable, respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, four and five vendors accounted for 73% and 87% of total purchases, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, four and three vendors accounted for 73% and 72% of total purchases, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that may subject the Company to credit risk include uninsured cash-in-bank balances. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions located in Southern California. From time to time, such balances exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to its cash balances. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s uninsured cash was $688,646.
Plan of Merger and Reorganization
On January 6, 2013, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Broadcast Merger Agreement”) with Broadcast International, Inc., a Utah corporation (“Broadcast International”) and Alta Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast International (“Merger Sub”).
On April 9, 2013, Broadcast, Merger Sub and the Company entered into a First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Amendment”) with Broadcast International, Inc., a Utah corporation (“Broadcast International”) and Alta Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast International (“Merger Sub”).
On June 30, 2013, we entered into a Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Second Amendment”) with Broadcast International, Inc., a Utah corporation (“Broadcast International”) and Alta Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast International (“Merger Sub”).
Assuming conditions to closing are satisfied, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Company, and Company will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcast international (the “Broadcast Merger”).
NOTE 9 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company currently operates in one business segment, digital media services. All fixed assets are located at the Company’s headquarters and data centers located in the United States. All sales for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were in the United States and Canada.
NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 1, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 65,000 options to an employee.
An entity contributing approximately 20% of our revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2013, which entity is a customer and also a supplier, has initiated a discussion regarding a reduction in the use of Company services. We expect to negotiate a modified relationship with this customer and supplier. The Company anticipates that the modified relationship will negatively affect the Company’s revenue but that it will not have a material impact on the Company’s cash flow from operations or profitability.