Exhibit 1.01

Pro-Dex, Inc.

Conflict Minerals Report

For the Reporting Period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024

This Conflict Minerals Report (“Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2024 is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Rule”). This Report relates to the process undertaken for Pro-Dex products that were manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, during calendar year 2024 and that contain gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, wolframite, tantalum, tin, and tungsten (collectively, the “Conflict Minerals”). This Report has not been audited.

Product Overview

Pro-Dex designs and produces powered surgical instruments used in the medical industries. Our products are found in hospitals, medical engineering labs, and scientific research facilities around the world. Third party products that are not manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by Pro-Dex are outside the scope of this Report.

Statement Regarding Conflict Minerals

We are committed to the maintenance of a supply chain that aligns with the requirements of the Rule, and to continuing our evaluation of our quality management system (“QMS”) to provide for continued compliance.

Due Diligence Program

Based on our assessment of products known to be in our supply chain and a survey of responses received from those in our supply chain, we implemented a due diligence program (“Due Diligence Program”) to evaluate the source of certain Conflict Minerals included in our supply chain, as follows:

Our evaluation of the source of Conflict Minerals was incorporated into our QMS, a component of which is our internal compliance auditing that is conducted at scheduled frequencies and comprehensively reviewed annually.

Cross-functional teams, including Quality Assurance/Regulatory Affairs, Engineering, Materials/Production Management and Finance, reviewed our regulatory compliance matters in connection with the Rule.

We performed a product assessment to identify products and materials that were suspect or high-risk for Conflict Minerals, and maintained a list of such material and components.

We surveyed the suppliers of the suspect, high-risk and other components used in our products identified as containing Conflict Minerals and reviewed the responses that we received so as to evaluate and classify the use of Conflict Minerals and to determine necessary follow up. Based upon our 2024 survey of seventy-six (76) identified vendors, forty-two (42) indicated they are conflict free and the remaining thirty-four (34) vendors have not responded.

QMS procedures were established and updated, to provide for compliance with reporting and disclosure requirements of the Rule and concomitant supportive guidance documents, summarized as follows:

Procedures implemented define the methods and frequency associated with required audits.

Reporting procedures implemented integrate the results of the procedures described above with our financial reporting controls.

Recordkeeping procedures define methods to collect, identify, store, access, maintain and dispose of our records and documents associated with conflict minerals in conformity with record-retention requirements of all regulatory agencies and legislation to which we are subject.

Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry and Conclusion

After complying with the steps set forth by our Due Diligence Program, we have determined that we manufacture products containing Conflict Minerals in a manner necessary to the functionality of products manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by us. As of the date of this Report, we have not identified any Conflict Minerals in our supply chain that are sourced from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) or adjoining countries. However, because of the nature of our supply chain and the number of vendors that have not responded to our Conflict Minerals survey, we do not have sufficient information to definitively determine the origin of all of the Conflict Minerals that are subject to this Report. We continue to engage with our suppliers with the goal of increasing supplier response rates and improving the content of the supplier survey responses we receive.

Table 1.  Smelters or Refiners (“SOR”) List in the Company’s Supply Chain at December 31, 2024

The following table lists the SORs that the suppliers we surveyed reported as being in their supply chains as well as the country of origin. Many of our suppliers provided company-level data in their responses to us, which means that they may have provided information about Conflict Minerals used in products manufactured for us as well as other customers. As such, not all SORs listed below may have processed Conflict Minerals necessary to the function or production of our products. In addition, the list below may not be inclusive of all SORs in our supply chain as some of our suppliers were not able to identify the SORs used to process Conflict Minerals in the products they manufactured for us. In April 2024, we received an anonymous notice from our whistleblower hotline to alert us that we had listed a sanctioned supplier, the smelter African Gold Refinery (“AGR”) in Uganda, on our smelter list. We have communicated with the supplier that had reported using AGR and they informed us that they have been previously made aware of this and are working diligently to remove AGR from their supply chain, but as of the calendar year 2024, this smelter has still been reported by this supplier.