Exhibit 1.01

INTERLINK ELECTRONICS, INC.

Conflict Minerals Report
For the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2023

1.0            Introduction

This Conflict Minerals Report (“Report”) of Interlink Electronics, Inc. has been prepared in accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Rule 13p-1”) for the reporting period January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. As used in this Report and unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, all references to “Interlink,” “we,” “our,” “Company” and similar references are references to Interlink Electronics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Final Conflict Minerals Rule  (SEC Final Rule)¹ requires a three-step compliance process: the first step is determining the applicability of the rule; the second step is conducting a “reasonable country of origin inquiry” (RCOI) to determine whether or not there is reason to believe that tin, tungsten, tantalum or gold (3TG), also referred to as conflict minerals, from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries (collectively, the “Covered Countries”) are present in the company’s products or are from recycled or scrap sources; and if so, the third step is conducting due diligence to determine the source and origin of those conflict minerals based on the facilities (smelter or refiners, “SORs”) in which they were processed. Companies requiring due diligence must use a nationally or internationally recognized standard such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Guidance ²) to meet the SEC regulatory requirements. The sections below describe Interlink’s approach as part of our internal regulatory compliance program activities to meet each of the three steps in the SEC Final Rule compliance process; these activities were completed in concert with Source Intelligence as our outside consultant.

The first step in SEC Final Rule compliance is examining the rule’s applicability to Interlink’s activities. According to the Final Rule, there are four decision criteria:

Interlink engaged a third-party consulting firm, Source Intelligence (https://www.sourceintelligence.com/), to assist with the collection of information about the presence and sourcing of conflict minerals used in the products and components supplied to us. We provided a list of Tier 1 suppliers determined to be in-scope for regulatory purposes to Source Intelligence. Based on Interlink’s influence over the manufacturing process (i.e., meeting the manufacture or contract to manufacture definitions in Rule 13p-1) and potential use of 3TG these suppliers were engaged following the RCOI process described in section 4.1 below.

¹ Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 240 and 249b, http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf.

² OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/GuidanceEdition2.pdf.

³ Conflict minerals are considered “outside the supply chain” if they were smelted or refined or were outside of a covered country prior to January 31, 2013.

2.0            Company Overview

Interlink designs, develops, manufactures, and sells a range of force-sensing and gas-sensing technologies that incorporate our proprietary materials technology, firmware, and software into a portfolio of standard sensor-based products and custom sensor-system solutions. These include sensor components, sub-assemblies, modules, and products that support effective, efficient cursor control and novel three-dimensional user inputs. Our human machine interface technology platforms are deployed in a wide range of markets including consumer electronics, automotive, industrial, and medical.

In March 2023, Interlink acquired Calman Technology Ltd., a manufacturer of membrane keypads, graphic overlays and printed electronics based in Irvine, Scotland. Calman have over 30 years’ experience in developing keypad and related solutions for diverse customers across markets including industrial, medical, consumer and defense. The Conflict Minerals reporting rule permits a reporting company which acquires another company that manufactures or contracts for the manufacture of products which potentially contain conflict minerals and which previously had not been required to file a Form SD report for those minerals, to delay the reporting on the acquired company’s products until the end of the first calendar year that begins no sooner than eight months after the closing date of the acquisition. As such this current report does not include the products of Calman Technology. These will be included in the next reporting period.

3.0            Conflict Minerals Policy

We have adopted a Conflict Minerals Policy that states our commitment to ethical business conduct and the responsible sourcing of minerals throughout our global supply chain. The Conflict Minerals Policy is available on our website at www.interlinkelectronics.com under “About Us - Environment and Sustainability” and can be directly accessed using the following link - https://www.interlinkelectronics.com/hubfs/Conflict_Minerals_Policy_January_2020.pdf

4.0            Supply Chain and Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

We determined that certain conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality of one or more of our products that we manufactured or had manufactured during the Reporting Period, and thus conducted a reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI) to determine whether any conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of such products originated in the Covered Countries or are from recycled or scrap sources. We established an internal team responsible for the reasonable country of origin inquiry, which included employees involved with material procurement. We engaged with an outside contractor, Source Intelligence Inc., to help with the logistics and compilation of the responses from our supply chain.

We contract with numerous suppliers that contribute to the manufacture of our products, and are several levels removed from the smelters or refiners (“SORs”) that process the minerals used in our products and from the mines of origin for those minerals. Interlink does not purchase raw ore or unrefined conflict minerals, and we made no purchases in the Covered Countries. As a result, in conducting our RCOI, we necessarily relied upon our suppliers to provide conflict minerals sourcing information and identify those SORs that represent the sources of conflict minerals in our supply chain.

4.1.            Reasonable Country of Inquiry Process

The RCOI began with an evaluation of our suppliers who provided materials, components or products that became part of products we manufactured or contracted to be manufactured in 2023 which contained or were likely to contain conflict minerals necessary to the production or functionality of those products. To complete the RCOI required by the SEC Final Rule, Source Intelligence engaged our suppliers to collect information about the presence and sourcing of tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold (3TG) used in the products and components supplied to Interlink. The program utilized the Responsible Minerals Initiative’s (RMI) Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT). Only CMRTs version 6.22 or higher were accepted. Suppliers were offered two options to submit the required information, either by uploading the CMRT in MS Excel format or by completing an online survey version of this template directly in the SI platform. In certain cases, if a supplier was unable to complete it on the platform, we or Source Intelligence uploaded the CMRT on their behalf.

4.2.            Supplier Engagement

We provided Source Intelligence with at least one method of contact for each Tier 1 supplier designated as in-scope (email address, telephone number, fax number, or mailing address). Email was the preferred and primary method of communication.

The RCOI began with an introductory email to our suppliers describing the Conflict Minerals Compliance Program (CMCP) requirements and identifying Source Intelligence as our partner in the process. Following that introductory email, Source Intelligence sent a subsequent email to suppliers containing a registration and survey request link for the on-line data collection platform. Following the initial introductions to the program and information request, up to 8 reminder emails were sent to each non-responsive supplier requesting survey completion.

4.3.            Escalation

If, after these efforts, a given supplier still did not register with the system or provide the information requested, an escalation process was initiated. The escalation process consisted of direct outreach by Interlink. Specifically, Interlink contacted these suppliers by email to request their participation in the program. Source Intelligence followed up with an additional email in a timely manner.

4.4.            New Information Cut-off

In recognition that the information requested can take time to collect and aggregate, suppliers were given a final deadline of May 3,^rd 2024 to provide information about the metal processors present in their supply chains for the 2023 reporting year.

4.5.            Information Requested

Suppliers were asked to provide information regarding the sourcing of their materials with the goal of identifying the 3TG smelters or refiners (“SORs”) and associated mine countries of origin. Suppliers who had already performed a RCOI using the CMRT were asked to upload this document into the Source Intelligence system or to provide this information in the online survey version.

We chose to give our suppliers the ability to share information at a level with which they were most comfortable, i.e. company, product or user-defined, but the declaration scope had to be specified.

Suppliers were requested to provide an electronic signature before submitting their data to Interlink to verify that all answers submitted were accurate to the best of the supplier’s knowledge, but the suppliers were not required to provide an electronic signature to submit their data.

4.6.            Quality Assurance

Supplier responses were evaluated for plausibility, consistency, and gaps. If any of the following “quality control” (QC) flags were raised, suppliers were automatically contacted by the Source Intelligence platform on a bi-weekly basis up to 3 contacts.

5.0            RCOI Results

Source Intelligence provided Interlink with a comprehensive report of the results of their RCOI campaign. We have extracted the necessary information for this report and presented it in the attached Annexes.

A total of 46 Tier 1 suppliers were identified as in-scope for conflict mineral regulatory purposes and contacted as part of the RCOI process conducted by Source Intelligence. The response rate among these suppliers was 61%.

Of these responding suppliers, 39% indicated one or more of the regulated metals (3TG) as necessary to the functionality or production of the products they supply to Interlink.

Based on Source Intelligence’s smelter/refiner database⁴, and as shown in the attached Data Summaries, there was an indication of DRC or covered country sourcing for only 43 out of 246 verified smelters/refiners.

⁴ Source Intelligence maintains a smelter/refiner database to document which companies are known metal processors (i.e., verified), which companies are exclusive recyclers, mine country of origin information, and DRC conflict-free certification status. Source Intelligence collects SOR data submitted by suppliers via CMRTs and compares it against its existing database. Supplier responses listing entities that are not verified smelters/refiners are flagged and suppliers are asked for further clarification.

The 246 SORs along with the specific metals they refine are listed in Annex I. The 43 SORs identified as potentially sourcing from covered countries are listed in Annex II of this report. All 43 of these SORs are RMI certified Conflict Free by either RMAP (Responsible Minerals Assurance Process) or LBMA (London Bullion Market Association) and are certified Conflict Free.

In addition, there were also 7 SORs in our supply chain where the source of the covered metals was unknown. 6 of these has a RMI Risk Level of 1 (little to no risk) and 1 was rated with an RMI Risk Level of 2 (low to medium risk).

4.7.            Detailed Survey Data and Conclusion

Source Intelligence provided Interlink with a comprehensive report of the results of their RCOI campaign. We have extracted the necessary information for this report and presented it in the attached Annexes.

Based on our best efforts, Interlink has concluded that certain of its products in calendar year 2023 may contain conflict minerals that may have originated in the Covered Countries and were not from scrap or recycled sources.

For those supply chains with 43 SORs that are known or thought to be sourcing conflict minerals in the Covered Countries, additional investigation is needed to determine the source and chain-of-custody of the conflict minerals. In addition, there are 7 SORs that have unknown sources of conflict minerals. For these reasons, and because only 61% of the Identified Suppliers responded to our RCOI request for information, we are unable to determine whether any conflict minerals in products that we manufactured or had manufactured in 2023 financed or benefited armed groups in a Covered Country. However, of the 43 SORs that have been identified all have been certified Conflict Free by Third Party audit.

6.0            SOR Summary

In response to our RCOI, our responding suppliers identified 246 SORs in their CMRTs which may have processed conflict minerals contained in materials, components or products provided to us. A list of these SORs is set forth in Annex I. We cross-referenced these SORs against the list of facilities that have received a “conflict free” designation from the Conflict-Free Smelter Program (“CFSP”) and its cross-recognized programs (e.g. the Responsible Jewellery Council and the London Bullion Market Association), whose designations provide country of origin and additional due diligence information on the conflict minerals sourced by such facilities. Of these 246 identified SORs 43 SORs were identified as sourcing from Covered Countries, as of May 3^rd, 2023. A list of these is set forth in Annex II:

7.0            Risk Mitigation Efforts

Interlink believes that the Subject Minerals contained in our products originate from the countries listed in Annex III below, as well as from recycled and scrap sources.

Interlink intends to undertake the following additional steps to continue to mitigate any potential risk that the necessary conflict minerals in our products could benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries:

8.0            Definitions

The detailed reports provided to us by Source Intelligence and used in the preparation of this Conflict Mineral Report contained detailed data regarding the certification status and the types of certifications that each SOR has obtained. These are not reported here but below is a list of some of the definitions that are used to support this report.

Certification Status:

Responsible Minerals Assurance Process: Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI)

Responsible Gold Certificate: London Bullion Market Association (LBMA)

Chain of Custody Certificate: Responsible Jewelry Council (RJC)

Verification Status:

RMI Standard Smelter: Smelter or Refiner (SOR) is listed on the CMRT Smelter Look-up tab.

Sourcing Country Level:

RMI Standard Smelter

Smelter or Refiner (SOR):

A smelter or refiner is any company that procures and processes mineral ore, slag and/or materials from recycled or scrap sources into refined metal or metal-containing intermediate products. The output can be pure (99.5% or greater) metals, powders, ingots, bars, grains, oxides, or salts. The following additional definitions are used in the classification of these SORs.

Probable - SOR company website indicates that company meets CFSI definition of SOR, but SI has not received email or phone confirmation from SOR.

Alleged - 3rd party website indicates that company meets CFSI definition of SOR, but SI has not received email or phone confirmation from SOR.

Uncertain - Information about the SOR cannot be found. The name may have been provided by a supplier through a CMRT but no further evidence about the company has been located.

Removed - The CFSI has determined that the smelter no longer meets the definition of a SOR.

Retired - The CFSI has retired the parent or group level smelter and CID and replaced it with separate smelting facilities.

Inactive - Source Intelligence has determined through outreach or research that the entity no longer meets the definition of a SOR.

In Progress - SI’s Smelter Verification team is currently researching and contacting the SOR to determine if it meets the definition of a SOR.

Non-Processor -The company does not actually process/smelt the mineral.

CFSI - Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative

Annex I

SMELTERS AND REFINERS IN SUPPLY CHAIN

246 Smelters Or Refiners (SORs) Reported In Interlink’s Supply Chain For 2023

Annex II

SMELTERS AND REFINERS SOURCING FROM COVERED COUNTRIES

SMELTERS AND REFINERS SOURCING FROM UNKNOWN COUNTRIES

43 Smelters or Refiners (SORs) Reported In Interlink’s Supply Chain Who Source Metals from Covered Countries but are Certified Conflict Minerals Free by Third Party Audit For the Year 2023

In addition, there are a total of 7 Smelters or Refiners (SORs) reported where there is no known country of origin for the specific metals. However, 5 of these are Level 1 risk and only 1 is classified as Level 2 risk (low-medium).

7 Smelters or Refiners (SORs) Reported In Interlink’s Supply Chain Who Source Metals from unknown sources.

Annex III

COUNTRIES FROM WHICH SUBJECT MINERALS ARE SOURCED