Exhibit 1.01

Starbucks Corporation

Conflict Minerals Report

(For the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2024)

This is Starbucks Corporation’s (“Starbucks”) 2024 Conflict Minerals Report (“CMR”) pursuant to Rule 13p-1 and Form SD (the “Conflict Minerals Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the reporting period of January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”).

I. Introduction

Starbucks sells a variety of merchandise, in addition to coffee and other beverages and food products, to customers through our company-operated stores and to licensees and foodservice operators for re-sale to their customers. We also sell certain equipment (such as coffee brewers and espresso machines) and furniture to some of these licensees and foodservice operators for their use but not for re-sale to customers. All of these products are manufactured directly or indirectly by our suppliers. As a result of our position in the supply chain, we have no direct or contractual relationships with mines, smelters, refiners or other lower-tier suppliers of Conflict Minerals (defined below) sourced by our suppliers.

II. Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

Starbucks conducted a reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) under the Conflict Minerals Rule to determine whether any tantalum, tin, tungsten, or gold (“Conflict Minerals” or “3TG”) necessary to the functionality or production of products which we manufactured or contracted to manufacture originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries (collectively, “Covered Countries” or “DRC”), or are from recycled or scrap sources. Starbucks assembled teams of Starbucks employees from our Legal, Supply Chain and Global Responsibility functions to support this inquiry. The Supply Chain team conducted an investigation to compile a list of suppliers of potentially relevant products manufactured during the Reporting Period containing Conflict Minerals. The team queried employees involved in procuring and selling such products manufactured during the Reporting Period, including with respect to whether the Conflict Minerals were necessary for the functionality or production of the product and identifying the supplier of the product. If there was uncertainty as to whether Conflict Minerals were necessary to the functionality or the production of the product, the supplier remained on the list. A total of 15 suppliers (“Identified Suppliers”) were identified.

Starbucks also engaged a third-party service provider (“Service Provider”) to assist Starbucks with our RCOI and engage with Identified Suppliers. Starbucks worked with our Service Provider to collect information about the presence and sourcing of Conflict Minerals used in the products and components supplied to Starbucks. Our Service Provider utilizes an online system to collect, store and review information provided by suppliers, to identify downstream suppliers and sourcing practices, track information on smelters and refiners, and to identify risks in sourcing practices. The program utilized the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative’s Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”).

An introductory e-mail from Starbucks was sent to the Identified Suppliers describing the Conflict Minerals Rule and identifying our Service Provider as the third-party service provider assisting Starbucks with supplier engagement and the Conflict Minerals Rule’s compliance process. The introductory e-mail also conveyed that Starbucks expected the Identified Suppliers to cooperate with the compliance process. Following the introductory e-mail, our Service Provider sent a subsequent e-mail to the Identified Suppliers containing a registration and survey request link for the online data collection platform.

Identified Suppliers were also given access to our Service Provider's supplier resource center. The Service Provider's supplier resource center contains materials on the Conflict Minerals compliance requirements and process, applicable regulations, and answers to frequently asked questions concerning Conflict Minerals tracing, and also provides opportunities to participate in webinars providing information on the Conflict Minerals Rule.

Following the initial introductions to the program and information request, reminder e-mails were sent to each non-responsive Identified Supplier requesting survey completion. Identified Suppliers who remained non-responsive to these e-mail reminders were contacted by our Service Provider by telephone and offered assistance. If, after these efforts, an Identified Supplier still did not register or provide the information requested, Starbucks contacted the unresponsive Identified Supplier by e-mail and telephone to request their participation in the program. Our Service Provider then followed up with an e-mail to the Identified Supplier.

Identified Suppliers were asked to provide information regarding the sourcing of their materials with the ultimate goal of identifying the 3TG smelters or refiners (“SORs”) and associated mine countries of origin. Where an Identified Supplier was unable to provide a CMRT, our Service Provider requested information on the Identified Supplier’s suppliers of products or components which may require 3TG for their production or functionality. These suppliers, and subsequent tiers of suppliers as needed, were then engaged by our Service Provider following the contact procedures explained above.

The responses from Identified Suppliers were evaluated for plausibility, consistency and gaps, and additional contact was made with Identified Suppliers as needed to seek to resolve any inconsistencies and gaps.

Our Service Provider maintains an SOR database to document which companies are known metal processors (i.e., verified) and which companies are exclusive recyclers, as well as mine country-of-origin information and DRC conflict-free certification status. Our Service Provider collects SOR data submitted by suppliers via CMRTs and compares it against its existing database. Supplier responses listing entities that are not verified SORs are flagged, and suppliers are asked for further clarification.

III. Results of RCOI

Of the 15 Identified Suppliers engaged in the RCOI, 93% responded. Of these responding suppliers, 86% indicated that the products they supplied to Starbucks contained Conflict Minerals necessary to the functionality or production of such products. These products include certain equipment sold to licensees. Based on the RCOI process described above, 371 SORs were identified as sources of Conflict Minerals that may be contained in products we manufactured or contracted to manufacture during the Reporting Period. These SORs are listed in Annex I below. Based on the RCOI, Starbucks believes that the countries of origin of the Conflict Minerals may include the countries listed in Annex II below, as well as recycled or scrap sources.

Of the 371 SORs that were identified as sources of Conflict Minerals through the RCOI, there was an indication that 49 may have been sourcing from the DRC.

Starbucks determined that it was required to exercise due diligence on the Conflict Minerals’ source and chain of custody.

IV. Due Diligence

Due Diligence Design: Starbucks designed its due diligence measures based upon the internationally recognized due diligence framework set forth in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including the supplements thereto.

Due Diligence Measures Performed

As part of our due diligence process, Starbucks also engaged with our Service Provider.

For those supply chains with SORs that are known or thought to be sourcing from the DRC, additional investigation was conducted by our Service Provider to determine the source and chain-of-custody of the Conflict Minerals. Our Service Provider relied on the following internationally accepted audit standards to determine which SORs were considered not to be sourcing Conflict Minerals that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the DRC: the Responsible Minerals Initiative’s Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, the London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Program, and the Responsible Jewellery Council Chain-of-Custody Certification (such SORs are referred to as “Certified SORs”).

If the SOR was not certified by the above internationally recognized standards, our Service Provider attempted to contact the SOR to gain more information about their sourcing practices, including countries of origin and transfer, and whether there were any internal due diligence procedures in place or other processes the SORs engaged in to track the chain-of-custody or the source of mineral ores.

In addition to the due diligence measures described above, we have a Conflict Minerals Policy Statement, which is publicly available at https://content-prod-live.cert.starbucks.com/binary/v2/asset/144-71879.pdf, and the due diligence findings were reported to senior management.

V. Due Diligence Findings

As of April 15, 2025, 45 of the 49 SORs for which there was an indication that they may have been sourcing from the DRC were Certified SORs. Starbucks is not voluntarily electing to describe any of its products as “DRC conflict free.”

VI. Future Measures

Starbucks intends to continue its due diligence measures by taking the following steps:

This CMR contains forward-looking statements. All statements contained in this CMR other than statements of historical fact, including but not limited to statements relating to planned due diligence measures, are forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends. These statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. We assume no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this CMR, except as may be required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Web links in this CMR are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites does not constitute a part of this CMR.

ANNEX I

ANNEX II

14