Please wait
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box
| |
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
Giant Industries, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| |
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date
of its filing. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC.
23733 North Scottsdale Road
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
Notice of 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Dear stockholder:
Our 2005 annual meeting of stockholders will be held at
3:00 p.m. on April 27, 2005 at the Grand Hyatt New
York located at 109 East 42nd Street, New York, New
York 10017. At the meeting, you will be asked to:
|
|
| |
1. Elect three directors to hold office until the 2008
annual meeting of stockholders, |
| |
| |
2. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending
December 31, 2005, and |
| |
| |
3. Consider any other matters that may properly come before
the meeting. |
Stockholders of record at the close of business on
March 11, 2005 are entitled to vote at the meeting and at
any adjournment of the meeting. A list of stockholders entitled
to vote at the meeting will be open for inspection during
ordinary business hours at our corporate headquarters building
from April 15, 2005 to April 27, 2005. Our
stockholders may inspect this list for any purpose related to
the meeting.
Details regarding admission to the meeting and the business to
be conducted at the meeting are provided in the accompanying
proxy statement. It is important that your shares be represented
and voted whether or not you expect to attend the meeting in
person. Therefore, please date, sign and complete the enclosed
proxy and return it in the enclosed envelope, which requires no
postage stamp if mailed in the United States.
|
|
| |
By Order of the Board of Directors |
| |
| |
| |
 |
| |
Fred L. Holliger |
| |
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Scottsdale, Arizona
March 16, 2005
GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC.
23733 North Scottsdale Road
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
PROXY STATEMENT
The Annual Meeting
Our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to encourage
your participation in our upcoming annual meeting and to obtain
your support on each of the proposals. You also may attend the
meeting and vote your shares directly. Your vote is important.
As a result, even if you do not attend in person, we encourage
you to vote by proxy.
This year we will hold the meeting on Wednesday, April 27,
2005, at 3:00 p.m. We will hold it at the Grand Hyatt New
York located at 109 East 42nd Street, New York, New York
10017. This proxy statement contains important information for
you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought
before the meeting. Please read it carefully. We are first
mailing this proxy statement and the proxy card to stockholders
on or about March 21, 2005. We also are mailing our 2004
annual report to you with this proxy statement.
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting
|
|
|
What is the purpose of the meeting? |
At our annual meeting, stockholders will vote to elect three
directors and ratify the selection of our independent auditors.
In addition, management will report on our performance during
2004 and respond to questions from stockholders.
|
|
|
Who is entitled to vote at the meeting? |
The board has set March 11, 2005 as the record date for the
annual meeting. If you were a stockholder at the close of
business on March 11, 2005, you are entitled to vote at the
meeting.
As of the record date, 12,356,151 shares of our common
stock were issued and eligible to vote at the meeting. There
were 216 stockholders of record.
|
|
|
What are my voting rights? |
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share.
Therefore, a total of 12,356,151 votes are entitled to be cast
at the meeting. There is no cumulative voting.
|
|
|
How many shares must be present to hold the
meeting? |
In accordance with our bylaws, shares equal to at least one-half
of the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock as
of the record date must be present at the meeting in order to
hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum.
Shares are counted as present at the meeting if:
|
|
|
| |
• |
You are present and vote in person at the meeting, or |
| |
| |
• |
You have properly submitted a proxy card by mail. |
If you are stockholder of record, you can give a proxy to be
voted at the meeting by completing, signing and mailing the
enclosed proxy card. If you hold your shares in “street
name,” you must vote your shares through your broker or
nominee. Your broker or nominee has enclosed or will otherwise
provide to you a voting instruction card for your use in
directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares.
2
|
|
|
What is the difference between a stockholder of record and
a “street name” holder? |
If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are
considered the stockholder of record with respect to those
shares.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a
bank or other nominee, then the brokerage firm, bank or other
nominee is considered to be the stockholder of record with
respect to those shares. You, however, are still considered the
beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be
held in “street name.” Street name holders generally
cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the
brokerage firm, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares
using the method described above under “How do I vote my
shares?”.
|
|
|
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy
card? |
If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold
shares registered in more than one account or that more than one
person in your household holds our shares. To ensure that all of
these shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card.
|
|
|
Can I vote my shares in person at the meeting? |
If you are stockholder of record, you may vote your shares in
person by attending the meeting and completing a floor ballot.
Even if you currently plan to attend the meeting, we recommend
that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your
vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the
meeting.
If you are a street name holder, you may vote your shares in
person at the meeting only if you obtain a signed letter or
other proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you
the right to vote the shares at the meeting.
|
|
|
What vote is required for the matters brought before the
meeting? |
The election of directors requires the favorable vote of a
majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote. All
other items being submitted to stockholders for a vote require
the favorable vote of a majority of the shares of common stock
represented at the meeting and entitled to vote.
For the election of directors, you may vote in favor of or
withhold your vote from each nominee. If you withhold your vote,
that will have the same effect as a vote against the nominee.
You may abstain from voting on all proposals except the election
of directors. We do not include abstentions in determining how
many shares are represented for purposes of a quorum. If you
abstain from voting on a proposal, that will have the same
effect as a vote against the proposal.
If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting
instructions to your broker, bank or nominee, your shares will
not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have
discretionary authority to vote under the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange. In this situation, a “broker non-vote”
occurs. We do not count broker non-votes in determining whether
a quorum is present or whether a proposal passes.
Our transfer agent will count the votes. In advance of the
meeting, we will appoint an election inspector to count all the
votes cast at the meeting and to report on the results.
|
|
|
How does the board recommend that I vote? |
The board recommends a vote:
|
|
|
| |
• |
FOR the nominees for director, and |
| |
| |
• |
FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2005. |
3
|
|
|
What if I sign and return my proxy card but I do not
specify how I want my shares voted? |
If you do not specify how you want to vote your shares on your
proxy card, we will vote them:
|
|
|
| |
• |
FOR the nominees for director, and |
| |
| |
• |
FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2005. |
|
|
|
Can I change or revoke my vote after submitting my
proxy? |
Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time
before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting. You can change
your vote in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Delivering to our corporate secretary a written revocation
notice with a date later than the date of the proxy, |
| |
| |
• |
Signing and delivering to our corporate secretary a later proxy
relating to the same shares, or |
| |
| |
• |
Attending the meeting and voting in person. Please note that
simply attending the meeting is not sufficient to revoke your
proxy. To change or revoke your vote, you must submit a new
proxy card or a written revocation at the meeting. |
The proxy holders will vote all properly submitted proxies that
are not revoked.
|
|
|
How can I attend the meeting? |
Stockholders may be asked to present valid picture
identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,
before being admitted to the meeting. If you hold your shares in
street name, you will need proof of ownership in order to vote
at the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or letter from the
broker or bank are examples of proof of ownership.
|
|
|
Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and
solicitation? |
We are soliciting proxies by mail, and we will pay the costs of
soliciting these proxies. Our directors, executive officers and
employees also may solicit proxies personally, by telephone or
by mail. We may distribute proxy materials through brokers,
custodians and other similar parties to the owners of our stock.
We will reimburse them for their reasonable, out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding proxy materials to our stockholders.
Election of Directors
Nominees
We currently have seven members on our board of directors.
Effective at our last annual meeting in April 2004, we reduced
the size of our board from eight to seven directors.
Our board of directors is divided into three classes. As of
March 1, 2005, there were three class I directors
(Anthony J. Bernitsky, George M. Rapport and Donald M.
Wilkinson), two class II directors (Fred L. Holliger and
Brooks J. Klimley), and two class III directors (Larry L.
DeRoin and Richard T. Kalen, Jr.). The term of each class
of director is three years, with the term of one class expiring
at each of our annual meetings of stockholders. The term of
office of the class I directors expires at the 2005 annual
meeting of stockholders.
Our corporate governance and nominating committee recommended to
the board that Mr. Bernitsky, Mr. Rapport and
Mr. Wilkinson be nominees for director at the annual
meeting. Based on the committee’s recommendation, our board
nominated all three individuals for election to class I at
the annual meeting. Mr. Bernitsky, Mr. Rapport and
Mr. Wilkinson have consented to being named as nominees and
have indicated their intention to serve if elected. All three of
the nominees are currently serving as directors and a brief
description of their business experience is set forth below.
4
Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote for the
election of Mr. Bernitsky, Mr. Rapport and
Mr. Wilkinson. If for any reason any of the nominees should
become unable to serve as a director, the proxy holders may vote
for the election of a substitute nominee designated by the board.
| |
|
|
| |
|
Age (as of March 1, 2005), |
| Nominee |
|
Principal Occupation and Business Experience |
| |
|
|
|
Anthony J. Bernitsky
|
|
Anthony J. Bernitsky, age 75, has served as one of our
directors since August 1996. Mr. Bernitsky also serves as a
member of the audit committee, the compensation committee, and
the corporate governance and nominating committee.
Mr. Bernitsky has been a co-owner, director and the
president of PoorBern Leasing Company since he founded it in
1982. PoorBern Leasing Company leases property used in a
wholesale and retail gasoline business with service stations and
convenience stores located in New Mexico and on the Navajo
Indian Reservation to a third party that operates the business. |
|
George M. Rapport
|
|
George M. Rapport, age 61, has served as one of our
directors since September 2001. Mr. Rapport also serves as
chairman of the audit committee and as a member of the
compensation committee. He currently is a director and the chief
financial officer for Knightsbridge Petroleum (UK) Ltd., an
international oil and gas exploration and production company,
and the finance director for Knightsbridge Chemicals Limited, an
international chemicals manufacturing company. Both of these
companies are subsidiaries of Knightsbridge Investments Limited
(“Knightsbridge”). In August 2004, Knightsbridge
acquired Nimir Petroleum Limited (“Nimir”), an
international oil and gas exploration and production company.
From August 2001 to October 2004, Mr. Rapport was the
senior vice president and chief financial officer of Nimir. From
May 2001 to August 2001, Mr. Rapport was a financial
advisor to Nimir. From 1993 to May 2001, he was a managing
director — private banking for Chase Manhattan Bank in
New York. |
|
Donald M. Wilkinson
|
|
Donald M. Wilkinson, age 67, has served as one of our
directors since September 2003. Mr. Wilkinson also serves
as a member of the audit committee and the corporate governance
and nominating committee. Since 1984, Mr. Wilkinson has
been the chairman and chief investment officer of Wilkinson
O’Grady & Co., Inc., a global asset management
firm located in New York City that he co-founded in 1972.
Mr. Wilkinson is a member of the Board of Visitors of the
Virginia Military Institute and is a former chairman of the
Board of Trustees for the Darden School of Business Management
at the University of Virginia. |
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR its
nominees for director.
5
Other directors and executive officers
Our other directors whose terms will continue after the annual
meeting and our executive officers are listed below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Age as of | |
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
March 1, 2005 | |
|
Position |
|
Class(1) | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Fred L. Holliger
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
II 2006 |
|
|
Brooks J. Klimley
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
II 2006 |
|
|
Larry L. DeRoin
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
III 2007 |
|
|
Richard T. Kalen, Jr.
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
III 2007 |
|
|
Morgan Gust
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
Mark B. Cox
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
and Assistant Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
C. Leroy Crow
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Executive Vice President of our Refining Group Strategic
Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Keller
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
President of Phoenix Fuel Strategic Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Sprouse
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President of our Retail Group Strategic Business
Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
S. Leland Gould
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Governmental Affairs and Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
Kim H. Bullerdick
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Sandeen
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Information
Officer, and Assistant Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory A. Barber
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President, Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
Natalie R. Dopp
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Each director’s term of office expires in the year set
forth opposite his name above. Each officer serves until his or
her successor is chosen and qualified or until his or her
earlier resignation or removal. |
Fred L. Holliger has served as one of our directors since we
went public in October 1989 and as our chairman of the board and
chief executive officer since March 29, 2002. From October
1989 to March 29, 2002, Mr. Holliger was our executive
vice president and chief operating officer. Mr. Holliger
joined us as senior vice president, and president of our
refining division, in February 1989.
Brooks J. Klimley has served as one of our directors since
August 2002. Mr. Klimley also serves as a member of the
audit committee and the compensation committee and is chairman
of the corporate governance and nominating committee. Since
2004, Mr. Klimley has been a consultant providing strategic
and financial advice to public and private corporations. From
2001 to 2004, Mr. Klimley was a managing director at
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and its predecessor firm Salomon
Smith Barney, Inc., and he was the co-head of the diversified
industrials group. As co-head of the diversified industrials
group, he was responsible for the global client management of a
variety of large capitalization industrial companies. From 1998
to 2001, Mr. Klimley was senior managing director and
co-head of the natural resources group for Bear,
Stearns & Co., Inc., where he led origination and
execution teams covering a broad range of natural resources
companies. Mr. Klimley also is on the Board of Visitors of
Columbia College in the City of New York.
Larry L. DeRoin has served as one of our directors since June
2002. Mr. DeRoin also serves as a member of the audit
committee and the corporate governance and nominating committee
and is chairman of the
6
compensation committee. Since September 2000, Mr. DeRoin
has been the president of DeRoin Management, Inc., which
provides investment, management and consulting services. From
1993 to September 2000, Mr. DeRoin was chairman and chief
executive officer of Northern Border Partners, L.P., chairman of
the management committee for Northern Border Pipeline Co., and
president of Northern Plains Natural Gas Co.
Richard T. Kalen, Jr. has served as one of our directors
since December 1989. He has been the president and owner of
Kalen & Associates, an executive search and consulting
firm, since April 1988.
Morgan Gust has served as our president since March 29,
2002. From February 1999 to March 29, 2002, Mr. Gust
served as our executive vice president. Mr. Gust joined the
company in August 1990, and over the years served in various
senior management positions for us, including vice president,
vice president administration, general counsel, and corporate
secretary.
Mark B. Cox has served as our vice president, treasurer,
financial officer and assistant secretary since December 1998.
In March 2002, Mr. Cox was named chief financial officer
and in April 2004, Mr. Cox was made executive vice
president.
C. Leroy Crow has served as executive vice president of our
refining group strategic business unit since March 2000. From
February 1999 to February 2000, Mr. Crow served as our
senior vice president, refinery operations and raw material
supply. Mr. Crow joined us in June 1997 when we acquired
Phoenix Fuel, and since then has served in various senior
management positions for us, including senior vice president,
operations division and vice president of operations.
Jack W. Keller has served as the president of our Phoenix Fuel
strategic business unit since its formation in February 1999. He
also has served as the president of Phoenix Fuel since we
acquired it in June 1997 and as chief operating officer of
Phoenix Fuel since May 1998.
Robert C. Sprouse has served as executive vice president of our
retail group strategic business unit since April 2003. From
January 2000 to April 2003, Mr. Sprouse served as our
director of retail operations. From 1996 to January 2000,
Mr. Sprouse held several management positions with
Strasburger Enterprises, Inc., a retail management consulting
company.
S. Leland Gould has served as our executive vice president,
governmental affairs and real estate since June 2002. From March
2002 to June 2002, Mr. Gould served as our executive vice
president of retail operations. Mr. Gould joined us in
August 2000 as vice president, strategic business development.
Prior to August 2000, Mr. Gould was vice president and
national sales manager for Wolf Camera, a photo retail store
chain with 800 stores nationwide. Mr. Gould also is a
director and the treasurer for the New Mexico Oil and Gas
Association and is a director for the New Mexico Petroleum
Marketers Association.
Kim H. Bullerdick has served as our vice president and corporate
secretary since December 1998 and our general counsel since May
2000. In April 2004, Mr. Bullerdick was made senior vice
president. From December 1998 to May 2000, Mr. Bullerdick
was our legal department director.
Roger D. Sandeen has served as our vice president, chief
accounting officer and assistant secretary since July 2003. In
January 2004, Mr. Sandeen was also named as our chief
information officer. From January 2002 to July 2003,
Mr. Sandeen was senior vice president and chief financial
officer for Venerable Group, a privately-owned company involved
in the real estate, business and information consulting and
dental industries. From 2000 through 2001, Mr. Sandeen was
an independent financial consultant to several organizations,
including the Venerable Group. From 1989 to 2000,
Mr. Sandeen was an executive officer for Xcel Energy, Inc.,
serving from time to time in various senior management
positions, including chief financial officer, chief accounting
officer and chief information officer.
Gregory A. Barber has served as our vice president, corporate
controller since April of 2004. From March 2001 to June 2004,
Mr. Barber served as our vice president, special project
management. From February 1999 to March 2001, Mr. Barber
served as our vice president, branded wholesale marketing.
7
Natalie R. Dopp has served as our vice president, human
resources since September 2002. Prior to that, Ms. Dopp was
responsible for our recruiting and compensation functions.
Ms. Dopp joined us in April 2000 and prior to that she was
employed by Scottsdale Insurance Company, a subsidiary of
Nationwide Insurance.
About the board of directors
Our board of directors meets throughout the year on a set
schedule. The board also holds special meetings and acts by
unanimous written consent from time to time as appropriate. The
non-management members of the board periodically meet in
executive session without management present. As provided in the
corporate governance guidelines adopted by the board, the
non-management directors designate the director who will preside
at the executive sessions. The non-management directors have
designated Mr. Klimley as the presiding director. He will
continue to serve in that role until such time as the
non-management directors designate someone else to serve in that
role. It is anticipated that the non-management directors will
consider the designation at least once a year.
Our board held nine meetings during 2004. The board has
established an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a
corporate governance and nominating committee. During 2004, all
incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate of:
(1) the total number of meetings of the board, and
(2) the total number of meetings of all committees on which
the director served.
It is our policy that our board of directors should make every
effort to attend the annual meeting. Last year, all continuing
members of the board attended the annual meeting.
Independent directors
Our board has determined that it is comprised of a majority of
individuals who are independent under the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange and applicable federal law. The board has
determined that, at a minimum, the following directors are
independent: Anthony J. Bernitsky, George M. Rapport, Donald M.
Wilkinson, Brooks J. Klimley and Larry L. DeRoin.
In reaching that determination, the board affirmatively
determined that the individuals it considers independent have no
material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner,
shareholder or officer of a company that has a relationship with
us. In particular, the board determined that these individuals
satisfied all of the following standards, which the Board
amended in 2005, making certain standards more similar to the
New York Stock Exchange standards:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Neither they, nor any immediate member of their family, have
ever been employed by us. |
| |
| |
• |
Neither they, nor any immediate member of their family, has
received any direct compensation from us (director and committee
fees and pensions or other forms of deferred compensation for
prior service were not considered compensation for this purpose;
provided such compensation was not contingent in any way on
continued service) in any twelve-month period within the last
three years. |
| |
| |
• |
Neither the director, nor any immediate family member, is
employed by another company that makes payments to, or receives
payments from, us for property or services in an amount which,
in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds $60,000. |
| |
| |
• |
They satisfy each of the bright-line standards of the New York
Stock Exchange that must be met if a director is to be
considered independent. |
Our directors on the audit committee meet the following
additional two standards:
|
|
|
| |
• |
They have not accepted, directly or indirectly, any consulting,
advisory or other compensatory fee from us other than
(1) compensation for board or committee service, or
(2) fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan
for prior service that is not contingent on continued service. |
| |
| |
• |
They are not affiliated with us. By this we mean that the
director does not directly, or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, control us, and is not controlled by, or under
common control with, us. The director is not considered to be in
control of us if (1) he is not the beneficial owner,
directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of any class of our
voting equity securities, and (2) he is not one of our
executive officers. |
8
About the committees of the board of directors
Our board has an audit committee, a compensation committee, and
a corporate governance and nominating committee. Each of the
committees has a written charter that may be found on our
website at www.giant.com. In addition, copies of the
charters are available to all stockholders by calling
(480) 585-8888 or by writing to: Kim H. Bullerdick,
Corporate Secretary, at our corporate headquarters located at
23733 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85255. All of
the members of each of our committees are independent directors
as required by the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and
applicable federal law. The following table presents information
about each committee.
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
The members of the committee are George M. Rapport (Chairman),
Anthony J. Bernitsky, Larry L. DeRoin, Brooks J. Klimley, and
Donald M. Wilkinson. The committee met seven times, either in
person or by telephone, in 2004. Our board has determined that
Mr. Rapport qualifies as an “audit committee financial
expert” as that term is defined in the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Among other matters, the
committee: |
| |
|
|
|
• Directly hires and replaces the independent auditors
as appropriate. |
| |
|
|
|
• Evaluates the performance of, independence of, and
pre-approves the services provided by, the independent auditors. |
| |
|
|
|
• Discusses the quality of our accounting principles
and financial reporting procedures with management and our
independent auditors. |
| |
|
|
|
• Reviews with management and our independent auditors
our annual and quarterly financial statements and recommends to
the board whether the annual financial statements should be
included in our annual report. |
| |
|
|
|
• Oversees the internal auditing functions and
controls. |
| |
|
|
|
• Established procedures for handling complaints
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing
matters, including procedures for the confidential, anonymous
submission of concerns by employees regarding accounting and
auditing matters. |
| |
|
|
|
• Prepares the audit committee report required by the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| |
|
Compensation Committee |
|
The members of the committee are Larry L. DeRoin (Chairman),
Anthony J. Bernitsky, Brooks J. Klimley, and George M. Rapport.
The committee met five times, either in person or by telephone,
in 2004. Among other matters, the committee: |
| |
|
|
|
• Oversees the administration of our compensation
programs. |
| |
|
|
|
• Sets the compensation for our chief executive
officer and our president. |
| |
|
|
|
• Reviews the compensation of our executive officers. |
| |
|
|
|
• Prepares the report on executive compensation
required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
9
|
|
|
Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee |
|
The members of the committee are Brooks J. Klimley (Chairman),
Anthony J. Bernitsky, Larry L. DeRoin, and Donald J. Wilkinson.
The committee was formed in January 2004 and replaced our former
nominating committee. The committee met three times, either in
person or by telephone, in 2004. Among other matters, the
committee: |
| |
|
|
|
• Identifies individuals believed to be qualified to
become members of our board and recommends to the board the
nominees to stand for election as directors at the annual
meeting. |
| |
|
|
|
• Makes recommendations to the board as to changes
that the committee believes to be desirable to the size of the
board and any committee of the board and to the types of
committees of the board. |
| |
|
|
|
• Makes recommendations to the board regarding the
composition of board committees. |
| |
|
|
|
• Develops and recommends to the board a set of
corporate governance guidelines and reviews those guidelines at
least once a year. |
In identifying and nominating candidates to the board, the
corporate governance and nominating committee considers, among
other factors, the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Personal qualities, including background and reputation,
reflecting the highest personal and professional integrity. We
seek individuals of exceptional talent and judgment. We also
seek individuals with the ability to work with other directors
and director nominees to build a board that is effective and
responsive to the needs of the stockholders. |
| |
| |
• |
Current knowledge of (1) the communities in which we do
business, (2) our industry, (3) other industries
relevant to our business, or (4) other organizations of
similar size. |
| |
| |
• |
Ability and willingness to commit adequate time to board and
committee matters. |
| |
| |
• |
Diversity of viewpoints, background, experience and other
demographics. |
| |
| |
• |
The individual’s agreement with our corporate governance
guidelines. |
Director candidates proposed by you
The corporate governance and nominating committee may consider
candidates recommended by our stockholders. If a stockholder
wishes to propose a nominee for consideration by the committee,
he or she may do so by submitting name(s) and supporting
information to:
|
|
| |
Giant Industries, Inc. |
| |
23733 N. Scottsdale Rd. |
| |
Scottsdale, AZ 85255 |
| |
Attention: Corporate Secretary |
When submitting nominees for consideration, a stockholder should
explain why the proposed nominee meets the factors that the
corporate governance and nominating committee considers
important. All candidates proposed will be evaluated by the same
criteria regardless of who proposes the candidate.
Corporate governance guidelines
In March 2004, the board adopted corporate governance
guidelines. A copy of the corporate governance guidelines may be
found on our website at www.giant.com. In addition,
copies of the corporate governance
10
guidelines are available to all stockholders by calling
(480) 585-8888 or by writing to: Kim H. Bullerdick,
Corporate Secretary, at our corporate headquarters located at
23733 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85255. The
guidelines set out our thoughts on, among other things, the
following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
The role of our board and management. |
| |
| |
• |
The functions of our board and its committees and the
expectations we have for our directors. |
| |
| |
• |
The selection of directors, the chairman of the board and chief
executive officer. |
| |
| |
• |
Election terms, retirement of directors, and management
succession. |
| |
| |
• |
Executive and board compensation. |
| |
| |
• |
Evaluating board performance. |
| |
| |
• |
Communications with the board. |
Code of ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our
directors, executives and employees. We have filed a copy of our
code of ethics as Exhibit 14.1 to our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
code of ethics also is posted on our website at
www.giant.com. In addition, copies of the code of ethics
are available to all stockholders by calling (480) 585-8888
or by writing to: Kim H. Bullerdick, Corporate Secretary, at our
corporate headquarters located at 23733 N. Scottsdale
Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85255. We intend to report on Form 8-K
all amendments to or waivers from the code of ethics that are
required to be reported by the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Contacting the board
If you wish to contact the board, you may do so by writing the
board at:
|
|
| |
Giant Industries, Inc. |
| |
23733 N. Scottsdale Rd. |
| |
Scottsdale, AZ 85255 |
| |
Attention: Corporate Secretary (Board Matters) |
If you wish to contact the presiding director or the
non-management directors as a group, you may do so by sending
your correspondence to the attention of the Corporate Secretary
(Presiding Director) or to the attention of the Corporate
Secretary (Non-Management Directors), as appropriate. Our
corporate secretary will forward your correspondence to the
appropriate members of the board.
Compensation of directors
Effective May 1, 2004, our non-employee directors receive
the following compensation for serving as a director for us:
|
|
|
| |
• |
$2,500 per month or portion of a month served as a director. |
| |
| |
• |
$1,500 for each in-person meeting of the board attended and
$1,000 for each telephonic meeting of the board in which the
director participates. |
| |
| |
• |
$1,250 for each in-person committee meeting attended and $1,000
for each telephonic committee meeting in which the director
participates. |
| |
| |
• |
$1,000 for each in-person or telephonic meeting of any special
committee in which the director participates. |
| |
| |
• |
$750 per month or portion of a month served as chairman of
the audit committee and $500 per month or portion of a
month served as chairman of the compensation committee or the
corporate governance and nominating committee. |
11
Prior to May 1, 2004, our non-employee directors received
the following compensation for serving as a director for us:
|
|
|
| |
• |
$1,500 per month or portion of a month served as a director. |
| |
| |
• |
$1,500 for each in-person meeting attended. |
| |
| |
• |
$500 for each telephonic meeting in which the director
participates. |
| |
| |
• |
$750 for the chairman and $500 for each member for each
in-person committee meeting attended. |
In addition, we reimburse all directors for reasonable,
out-of-pocket expenses that they incur to attend our board and
committee meetings.
12
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation we paid in the
last three years to our chief executive officer and our four
other most highly compensated executive officers. We will refer
to these five persons as our “named executive
officers”.
Summary Compensation Table
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Awards | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Securities | |
|
All Other | |
| |
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
Compen- | |
| |
|
|
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compen- | |
|
Options/ | |
|
sation | |
| Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
($)(1) | |
|
($) | |
|
sation ($) | |
|
SARS (#) | |
|
($)(2) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Fred L. Holliger
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
503,077 |
|
|
$ |
825,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
11,939 |
|
| |
Chairman of the Board and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
420,923 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
10,592 |
|
| |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
366,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
8,434 |
|
|
Morgan Gust
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
| |
President |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
306,412 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
11,063 |
|
| |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
271,300 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
8,434 |
|
|
Mark B. Cox
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
197,846 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
9,841 |
|
| |
Executive Vice President, Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
169,616 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
47,915 |
(4) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
9,680 |
|
| |
Financial Officer and |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
146,812 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
| |
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Leroy Crow
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
215,231 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
11,911 |
|
| |
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
198,462 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
11,546 |
|
| |
of Refining Group Strategic |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
8,284 |
|
| |
Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Keller
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
186,123 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
| |
President of the Phoenix |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
183,692 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
11,592 |
|
| |
Fuel Strategic Business Unit |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
8,284 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
Includes compensation deferred at the election of the named
executive officer. |
| |
| (2) |
The amounts disclosed in this column for 2004 represent the
following: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Description |
|
Holliger | |
|
Gust | |
|
Cox | |
|
Crow | |
|
Keller | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
401(k) match
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
Discretionary 401(k) contribution from us for 2003 made in 2004
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
| |
The discretionary 401(k) contribution from us was made in the
form of shares of our stock. The amount reported in the table
above represents the value of the shares on the date of
contribution. |
|
|
| (3) |
No such compensation was paid other than perquisites and other
personal benefits that have not been included because their
aggregate value did not meet the reporting threshold of the
lesser of $50,000 or 10% of salary plus bonus. |
| |
| (4) |
Total for 2003 consists of perquisites and other personal
benefits provided to Mr. Cox, including $40,884, which
represents the incremental cost to us of the initiation fee and
monthly dues attributable to his personal use of a golf club
membership. |
13
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
During 2004, we did not make any grants of stock options to any
of our employees.
Aggregated Option/ SAR Exercises In Last Fiscal Year
And Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table provides information on option exercises
during 2004 by our named executive officers and the value of
their unexercised options at December 31, 2004.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money | |
| |
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options/SARS at Fiscal | |
|
Options/SARS at Fiscal | |
| |
|
Acquired on | |
|
|
|
Year-End (#) | |
|
Year-End ($) | |
| |
|
Exercise | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
| Name |
|
(#) | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Unexercisable(1) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Fred L. Holliger
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
97,000/20,000 |
|
|
|
$1,435,520/$425,400 |
|
|
Morgan Gust
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
469,198 |
|
|
|
67,000/20,000 |
|
|
|
$844,520/$425,400 |
|
|
Mark B. Cox
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
$ |
351,128 |
|
|
|
9,000/-0- |
|
|
|
$212,940/-0- |
|
|
C. Leroy Crow
|
|
|
27,500 |
|
|
$ |
395,981 |
|
|
|
10,000/-0- |
|
|
|
$236,600/-0- |
|
|
Jack W. Keller
|
|
|
29,500 |
|
|
$ |
415,883 |
|
|
|
12,000/-0- |
|
|
|
$283,920/-0- |
|
|
|
| (1) |
Calculated based upon the difference between the closing market
price per share for our common stock on December 31, 2004
($26.51), as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and the
exercise price. |
Employment agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with
Mr. Holliger, Mr. Gust and Mr. Cox. The
employment agreements expire on December 11, 2006 but will
automatically extend for successive one-year periods unless we
or the executive gives notice of termination.
Pursuant to the agreements, Mr. Holliger, Mr. Gust and
Mr. Cox currently receive base salary at an annual rate as
follows: Mr. Holliger — $550,000,
Mr. Gust — $375,000 and Mr. Cox —
$220,000. The amounts are subject to increase during the terms
of the agreements as the board deems appropriate with respect to
Mr. Holliger and Mr. Gust, and as the chief executive
deems appropriate and the compensation committee approves with
respect to Mr. Cox. The base salary for each executive may
only be reduced in connection with an across-the-board reduction
applicable to all of our senior executives. Each agreement
provides that the executive is entitled to participate in any
bonus or benefit plans that we make available to our senior
executives.
The following is a summary of the amounts or benefits each
executive or his estate will receive from us if he is terminated
under the circumstance noted. The complete agreements have been
filed as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
|
|
| |
(1) Employment of the executive is terminated
(1) because of the executive’s death or disability,
(2) by the executive without good reason, or (3) by us
with cause, in each case either prior to a change of control or
more than three years following a change in control: |
|
|
|
| |
• |
Any unpaid base salary as of the termination date. |
| |
| |
• |
Reimbursement in accordance with our policies then in effect of
any expenses incurred prior to termination. |
| |
| |
• |
Accrued and vested benefits due under our benefit plans. |
| |
| |
• |
Any discretionary bonus for a prior year that has been earned
but not paid. |
| |
| |
• |
The right for one year following termination to exercise all
vested stock options outstanding on the termination date. |
14
|
|
| |
(2) Employment of the executive is terminated
(1) within three years of a change of control (two years
for Mr. Cox) or by the executive with good reason, or
(2) upon the expiration of the term of the agreement within
three years of a change of control (two years for Mr. Cox): |
|
|
|
| |
• |
The amounts and benefits described in paragraph 1 above
except the stock option benefit. |
| |
| |
• |
An amount equal to three times (two times for Mr. Cox) the
sum of: (1) the base salary in effect at the time of
termination, and (2) the average annual bonuses paid to the
executive for the last three years (two years for Mr. Cox),
but in no event less than 25% of the executive’s base
salary. |
| |
| |
• |
The right for one year following termination to exercise all
stock options, whether vested or unvested, outstanding on the
termination date. |
| |
| |
• |
Reimbursement for certain taxes incurred by the executive as a
result of receiving the above amounts. |
|
|
| |
(3) Employment of the executive is terminated (1) by
the executive for good reason, (2) by us without cause, or
(3) because we gave notice of our intention not to renew
the agreement when it expires, in each case either prior to a
change of control or more than three years following a change of
control (two years for Mr. Cox): |
|
|
|
| |
• |
The amounts and benefits described in paragraph 1 above. |
| |
| |
• |
A lump sum equal to the executive’s base salary in effect
at the time of termination. |
15
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The following report of the compensation committee of the
board on executive compensation shall not be deemed to be
“soliciting material” or to be “filed” with
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor shall this
information be incorporated by reference into any future filing
made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except
to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference
into any filing.
The functions of the compensation committee include overseeing
the administration of our compensation programs, setting the
compensation for our chief executive officer and president,
reviewing and approving the compensation of executive officers,
preparing any report on executive compensation required by the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and addressing any further compensation matters requested by the
board. The compensation committee currently consists of four
members of the board, each of whom the board has determined is
independent.
Our annual bonus plans generally include criteria for cash
bonuses for key personnel who, by the nature and scope of their
positions, significantly impact our overall results and success.
We also have a stock incentive plan — the 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan. The purpose of the plan is to attract, retain
and motivate officers and other key employees and consultants
and to provide these persons with incentives and rewards for
superior performance linked to our profitability increases in
stockholder value.
The committee considers the following major elements in
establishing compensation for our executive officers:
|
|
| |
(1) The level of compensation paid to executive officers in
similar positions by other companies. To determine whether pay
is competitive, the committee, from time to time, compares our
total compensation and benefits packages with those of other
companies in the same or similar industries or with other
similar attributes such as size or capitalization. Some, but not
all, of these companies are included in the S&P Industrials
Index and the S&P Energy Composite Index that are used for
comparative purposes in the total return graph which follows
this report. Many of the companies used in these indexes are
engaged in different businesses than us and almost all are
larger. The committee recognizes that our asset and business mix
is rather unique given our relatively small size, making direct
comparisons of compensation difficult. The committee also
recognizes, however, that total compensation for similar
positions must be competitive to attract and retain competent
executives. |
| |
| |
(2) The individual performance of each executive officer.
Individual performance includes any specific accomplishments of
the executive officer, demonstration of job knowledge and
skills, teamwork and demonstration of our core values. |
| |
| |
(3) The responsibility and authority of each position
relative to other positions within our organization. |
| |
| |
(4) Corporate performance. Corporate performance is
evaluated both subjectively and objectively. Subjectively, the
committee discusses and makes its own determination of how we
performed relative to the opportunities and difficulties we
encountered during the year and relative to the performance of
our competitors and business conditions. Objectively, corporate
performance is measured by earnings, cash flow, and other
financial results compared to budgeted results. |
| |
| |
(5) Incentives for executive officers to make decisions and
take actions that will increase the market value of our stock
over the long-term and that encourage our officers to remain
with us as long-term employees. |
In the case of base salary and awards granted under the stock
plan to executive officers, the application and weight given
each of these factors is not done mechanically or
quantitatively, but rather the committee uses its discretion,
best judgment and the experience of its members to examine the
totality of all of the relevant factors. In exercising this
discretion, the committee believes that it generally tends to
give greater weight to factors (1), (2), and (3) above in
fixing base salary and any merit/ cost of living increase and to
factor (5) in making awards under the stock plan. In
applying factor (1), the committee believes that total
compensation does not exceed the third quartile of amounts paid
to equally competent employees in similar
16
positions at other companies, after giving effect to the fact
that we do not have a defined benefit or actuarial pension plan
for our executive officers, while contributions by companies
with these plans tend to be quite significant, and the belief
that we have historically granted fewer stock options than
appears to be the practice at other companies.
In applying the foregoing compensation policies to the salaries
of the chief executive officer (“CEO”) and the
president during 2004, the committee authorized an increase in
the CEO’s salary of $100,000, resulting in his base salary
being increased from $450,000 per year to $550,000 per
year, and an increase in the president’s salary of $50,000,
resulting in his base salary being increased from
$325,000 per year to $375,000 per year, both effective
May 1, 2004. The committee authorized these increases after
considering the foregoing compensation policies, information on
executive compensation paid by other companies, and various
other information relating to compensation.
For our executive officers, as well as for certain other key
management employees, we adopted the 2004 Management
Discretionary Bonus Plan. As to our CEO and president, the plan
is administered by the compensation committee. As to all other
eligible employees, the plan is administered by an
administrative committee consisting of our CEO, president, and
vice president of human resources.
The plan provided for the accrual during 2004 of a pool of money
from which bonuses could be paid based on an assessment by the
administrative committee of our anticipated performance and
other factors which it deemed appropriate. To consider the
payment of any bonuses, we had to meet a pre-tax earnings
threshold for 2004. The committee determined that our earnings
had exceeded the plan threshold and the bonus pool was funded.
Cash bonuses awarded to plan participants under the plan were
based on an evaluation of individual performance and
accomplishments and the participant’s contributions and
support of our achievement of our goals and objectives for 2004.
Such goals and objectives included pre-tax earnings, cash flow,
and capital expenditure targets, completing a refinancing/
recapitalization program, and implementing a long-term crude oil
supply agreement for our Yorktown refinery.
The actual bonus recommended, if any, was within the complete
and sole discretion of the participant’s supervisor, and
was subject to the final approval of the administrative
committee in its sole discretion. In recommending a bonus award,
supervisors could utilize measurable performance goals and
achievements, commitment to our values, and other incentive or
performance measurement criteria as applicable to the
individual’s area of responsibility. To receive a bonus,
the participant had to be employed by us at the time the funds
were awarded, which was February 4, 2005.
In reviewing the administrative committee’s proposed
bonuses for our executive officers, and determining the bonuses
to be paid our CEO and President, the compensation committee
reviewed and discussed information on executive compensation
paid by other companies as well as various other materials and
matters regarding the payment of bonuses to the
Corporation’s executive officers, including: (1) the
elements and criteria considered by the compensation committee
in setting executive compensation discussed above; (2) the
application of the provisions of the plan regarding the award of
bonuses, including how our results of operations for 2004
compared to our goals and objectives; and (3) the
performance and contribution of the executive officers.
In connection with the compensation committee’s discussion
of the 2004 performance and contribution of both our CEO and
president, the compensation committee took note of the
leadership role that they had played in the achievement of our
goals and objectives, including: (1) year-end financial
performance that exceeded the plan’s financial goals;
(2) our successful refinancing/ recapitalization activities
during the year, which resulted in the issuance of
3 million additional shares of common stock, the redemption
of a portion of our outstanding 11% senior subordinated
notes due 2012, and the execution of a new $100 million
three-year senior secured revolving credit facility with a group
of banks; and (3) the execution of a long-term supply
agreement with Statoil for the purchase of acidic crude oil for
use at our Yorktown refinery, as well as the completion of
upgrades at the refinery that enabled it to process larger
quantities of this crude oil.
17
The compensation committee and the board reserve the right, in
their sole discretion, to amend, modify or eliminate the annual
bonus plan or its application or administration, in whole or in
part, in future years. If the compensation committee determines
to continue such a plan to future years, the elements of the
plan will be adjusted to reflect the amount of earnings to be
required before the plan becomes effective, the range of bonuses
payable at various levels of earnings and other matters.
Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code includes a
provision limiting tax deductions for certain executive
compensation in excess of $1,000,000 for each executive. The
committee has analyzed the impact of this tax law on our
compensation policies, and has decided for the present to not
modify our compensation policies based on this tax law. The
committee will periodically reconsider its decision as
circumstances dictate.
|
|
| |
Compensation Committee: |
| |
| |
Larry L. DeRoin (Chairman) |
| |
George M. Rapport |
| |
Brooks J. Klimley |
| |
Anthony J. Bernitsky |
18
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return Among the Company,
S&P Industrials Index, and S&P Energy Composite
Index(1)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Company Index |
|
|
Dec 99 |
|
|
Dec 00 |
|
|
Dec 01 |
|
|
Dec 02 |
|
|
Dec 03 |
|
|
Dec 04 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Giant Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
87.31 |
|
|
|
$ |
110.21 |
|
|
|
$ |
35.22 |
|
|
|
$ |
143.04 |
|
|
|
$ |
316.54 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P Industrials-LTD
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
83.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
73.97 |
|
|
|
$ |
56.44 |
|
|
|
$ |
72.43 |
|
|
|
$ |
79.73 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy-500
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
115.68 |
|
|
|
$ |
103.65 |
|
|
|
$ |
92.12 |
|
|
|
$ |
115.73 |
|
|
|
$ |
152.23 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1999, and dividends
reinvested. Historical performance does not necessarily predict
future results. |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During 2004, our compensation committee was comprised of Larry
L. DeRoin (Chairman), Anthony J. Bernitsky, Richard T.
Kalen, Jr., Brooks J. Klimley, and George M. Rapport.
Mr. Kalen resigned from the committee on March 6, 2004
and Mr. Bernitsky was added to the committee on
April 29, 2004. No member of our compensation committee is
or ever was an officer or employee of ours. In addition, during
2004, there were no compensation committee interlock
relationships required to be disclosed under the federal
securities laws.
19
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth information concerning the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 14,
2005 (unless otherwise noted) by (1) each director and
nominee for director, (2) each named executive officer, and
(3) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except
as otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, all persons listed
below have sole voting and investment power with respect to
their shares, except to the extent that authority is shared by
spouses under applicable law. Our only outstanding class of
equity securities is our common stock.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Within | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
60 Days of | |
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Percent | |
| Name |
|
Common Stock | |
|
March 14 | |
|
401(k)(1) | |
|
Owned | |
|
of Class | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Fred L. Holliger
|
|
|
22,927 |
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
11,672 |
|
|
|
151,599 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
Morgan Gust
|
|
|
5,500 |
(2) |
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
92,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Mark B. Cox
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
C. Leroy Crow
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
15,606 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Jack W. Keller
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Anthony J. Bernitsky
|
|
|
28,000 |
(3) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Donald M. Wilkinson
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
George Rapport
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Richard T. Kalen, Jr.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Larry DeRoin
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Brooks Klimley
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (17 Persons)
|
|
|
77,437 |
|
|
|
250,500 |
|
|
|
32,365 |
|
|
|
360,302 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
| (1) |
The amount listed is the approximate number of our shares
allocated to the Giant Stock Fund portion of the
individual’s account in the Giant Industries, Inc. and
Affiliated Companies 401(k) Plan (the “401(k)”) as of
December 31, 2004. The Giant Stock Fund is composed
primarily of our common stock and a small amount (approximately
5%) of short-term money market funds. Ownership in the Giant
Stock Fund is measured in units rather than shares of common
stock. Each 401(k) participant has the right to direct the
401(k) trustee to vote the participant’s proportionate
share of the common stock underlying the units in the Giant
Stock Fund. We determine a participant’s proportionate
share by multiplying the total number of underlying shares held
in the Giant Stock Fund by a fraction, the numerator of which is
the number of underlying shares allocated to the participant and
the denominator of which is the number of underlying shares
allocated to all participants’ accounts as of the record
date. The 401(k) trustee and the participants have shared
dispositive power with respect to the underlying shares
allocated to a participant’s account. |
| |
| (2) |
Shares are held in a trust in which Mr. Gust and his spouse
are settlors, co-trustees and beneficiaries. |
| |
| (3) |
Shares are held in a living trust in which Mr. Bernitsky
and his spouse are settlors, co-trustees and beneficiaries. |
| |
| (4) |
To date, non-employee directors have not participated in our
stock incentive plans or the 401(k). |
20
Shares Owned By Certain Shareholders
The following table sets forth information concerning the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 14,
2005 (unless otherwise noted) by each stockholder who is known
by us to own beneficially in excess of 5% of our outstanding
common stock. Except as set forth below, no other person or
entity is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Amount and | |
|
|
| |
|
Nature of | |
|
|
| |
|
Beneficial | |
|
Percent | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owners |
|
Ownership | |
|
of Class | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Barclays entities
|
|
|
1,065,335 |
(1) |
|
|
8.62% |
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.
|
|
|
942,600 |
(2) |
|
|
7.63% |
|
| |
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Santa Monica, California 90401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Management Trust Company,
|
|
|
901,069 |
(3) |
|
|
7.29% |
|
| |
as Trustee of Giant Industries, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
401(k) Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
82 Devonshire Street, C8A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putnam, LLC dba Putnam Investments
|
|
|
627,493 |
(4) |
|
|
5.08% |
|
| |
One Post Office Square |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
As reported on a Schedule 13G, dated February 14,
2005. In the Schedule 13G, the following entities reported
ownership of our shares: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA
|
|
|
923,910 |
|
| |
45 Fremont Street |
|
|
|
|
| |
San Francisco, California 94105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Fund Advisors
|
|
|
123,225 |
|
| |
45 Fremont Street |
|
|
|
|
| |
San Francisco, California 94105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Capital Securities Limited
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
| |
5 The North Colonmade |
|
|
|
|
| |
Canary Wharf, London, England E14 4BB |
|
|
|
|
|
Palomino Limited
|
|
|
14,500 |
|
| |
Walker House |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mary Street |
|
|
|
|
| |
P. O. Box 908 GT |
|
|
|
|
| |
George Town, Grand Cayman (Cayman Islands) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,065,335 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the entities has sole voting and dispositive power with
respect to the shares noted except that Barclays Global
Investors, NA has sole voting power only as to
868,438 shares, and Barclays Global Fund Advisors has
sole voting power only as to 122,340 shares. |
|
|
| (2) |
As reported on a Schedule 13G, dated February 9, 2005,
filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.
(“Dimensional”). The Schedule 13G states that
Dimensional, a registered investment advisor, furnishes
investment advice to four registered investment companies, and
serves as investment manager to other commingled group trusts
and separate accounts (as used in this paragraph only,
collectively, the “Funds”). The Schedule 13G further
states that in its role as investment advisor or manager,
Dimensional possesses both voting and/or investment power over
our stock owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be beneficial
owner of our stock held by the Funds. The Schedule 13G
states that all of our stock reported in the Schedule 13G
is owned by the Funds, and that Dimensional disclaims beneficial
ownership of these securities. |
21
|
|
| (3) |
As of January 31, 2005. |
| |
| (4) |
As reported on Schedule 13G, dated February 10, 2005,
filed by Putnam, LLC dba Putnam Investments
(“PI”). PI, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”),
wholly owns two registered investment advisers: Putnam
Investment Management, LLC., which is the investment adviser to
the Putnam family of mutual funds, and The Putnam Advisory
Company, LLC., which is the investment adviser to Putnam’s
institutional clients. Both subsidiaries have dispository power
over the shares as investment managers, but each of the mutual
fund’s trustees have voting power over the shares held by
each fund, and The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC. has shared
voting power over the shares held by the institutional clients.
Pursuant to Rule 13d-4, MMC and PI declare that the filing
of the Schedule 13G shall not be deemed an admission by
either or both of them that they are, for the purposes of
Section 13(d) or 13(g), the beneficial owner of any
securities covered by the Schedule 13G, and further state
that neither of them have any power to vote or dispose of, or
direct the voting or disposition of, any of the securities
covered by the Schedule 13G. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
The federal securities laws require our officers and directors,
and persons who own more than 10 percent of our common
stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York
Stock Exchange. These individuals also are required to furnish
us with copies of all reports they file. Based solely upon a
review of the filings provided to us during 2004, or with
respect to 2004, or written representations that no filings were
required, we believe that, except as set forth below, each
person who at any time during 2004 was a director, officer, or
greater than 10 percent beneficial owner filed the required
reports on a timely basis.
James E. Acridge was a member of our board of directors until
April 29, 2004. Mr. Acridge has been involved in
bankruptcy proceedings since 2002. According to a Form 4
filed on March 7, 2002, Mr. Acridge reported that he
owned 1,400,695 shares of our common stock, including
200 shares owned by his wife as to which he disclaimed
beneficial ownership. The publicly available filings obtained by
us in the course of Mr. Acridge’s personal bankruptcy
proceeding indicate that a substantial number of
Mr. Acridge’s shares of common stock have been sold.
We believe that all of the sales transactions required the
filing of a Form 4 or a Form 5. We do not believe any
Form 4 or Form 5 filings were made. From the
information available to us, however, it is unclear precisely
how many reports were late or the number of transactions that
were not reported on a timely basis.
Audit Committee Report
The following report of the audit committee shall not be
deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be
“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor shall this information be incorporated by reference into any
future filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, except to the extent that we specifically
incorporate it by reference into any filing.
In accordance with the written charter adopted by the board, the
committee assists the board in fulfilling its responsibility for
oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting,
auditing and financial reporting practices. During 2004, our
audit committee met seven times. Each member of the committee is
independent under the standards maintained by the New York Stock
Exchange and under applicable federal law.
In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit
process, the audit committee: (1) obtained from the
independent auditors a formal written statement describing all
relationships between the auditors and us that might bear on the
auditors’ independence consistent with Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, “Independence
Discussions with Audit Committees,” (2) discussed with
the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity
and independence, and (3) satisfied itself as to the
auditors’ independence. The committee also discussed with
management and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy
of our internal controls.
22
The committee discussed and reviewed with the independent
auditors all communications required by generally accepted
auditing standards, including those described in Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication
with Audit Committees” and, with and without management
present, discussed and reviewed the results of the independent
auditors’ audit of the financial statements.
The committee reviewed and discussed our audited financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004
with management and the independent auditors. Our management has
the responsibility for preparing the financial statements and
the independent auditors have the responsibility for auditing
those statements.
Based on the review and discussions with management and the
independent auditors described in the preceding three
paragraphs, the committee recommended to the board that our
audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, for
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
committee also decided to reappoint the independent auditors.
|
|
| |
Audit Committee: |
| |
| |
George M. Rapport (Chairman) |
| |
Anthony J. Bernitsky |
| |
Larry L. DeRoin |
| |
Brooks J. Klimley |
| |
Donald M. Wilkinson |
Audit Fees
The following table sets forth fees for services
Deloitte & Touche LLP provided to us during 2004
and 2003:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
$ |
1,759,500 |
|
|
$ |
632,175 |
|
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
|
|
118,525 |
|
|
|
117,825 |
|
|
Tax fees(3)
|
|
|
103,535 |
|
|
|
58,996 |
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
1,981,560 |
|
|
$ |
808,996 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Represents aggregate fees for services in connection with the
audit of our annual financial statements and review of our
quarterly financial statements, attestation procedures on
internal controls over financial reporting (2004 only), and
services related to Securities and Exchange Commission matters
and filings. |
| |
| (2) |
Represents aggregate fees for services in connection with
agreed-upon procedures, employee benefit plan audits, and
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 404 advisory services. |
| |
| (3) |
Represents fees for services provided in connection with our tax
returns, tax planning, and alternative fuel tax credit services. |
The audit committee has determined that the provision of certain
non-audit services by Deloitte & Touche LLP is
compatible with maintaining their independence. Except as noted
below, the audit committee approves in advance all audit and
non-audit services provided by Deloitte &
Touche LLP. The chairman, or in his absence, any other
member of the audit committee also has delegated authority from
the committee to pre-approve services provided by
Deloitte & Touche LLP. In this case, the member
pre-approving the services must report the pre-approval to the
audit committee at its next meeting. In addition, as permitted
by SEC rules, our chief financial officer, chief accounting
officer, or controller may approve permitted non-audit services
having a value of less than $5,000 in certain limited
circumstances. During 2004, all services provided by
Deloitte & Touche LLP were pre-approved in
accordance with this policy.
23
Ratification of Appointment of Auditors
We have selected Deloitte & Touche LLP,
independent auditors, to audit our consolidated financial
statements for 2005. Deloitte & Touche LLP has
served as our independent auditors since we became a public
company in 1989. We are asking our stockholders to ratify the
appointment of Deloitte & Touche as independent
auditors for 2005.
In the event stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the
audit committee may reconsider this appointment. Even if the
appointment is ratified, the audit committee, in its discretion,
may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting
firm at any time during the year if the audit committee
determines that such a change would be in our stockholders’
best interests.
The audit committee has approved all services provided by
Deloitte & Touche LLP. A member of
Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the meeting,
will have the opportunity to make a statement, and will be
available to respond to appropriate questions you may ask.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as independent auditors.
Stockholders’ Proposals
We welcome comments or suggestions from our stockholders. In the
event that you desire to have a proposal formally considered at
the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, and evaluated by the
board for inclusion in the proxy statement for that meeting, the
proposal must be received in writing by our corporate secretary
at the address on the first page of this proxy statement on or
before November 16, 2005.
In the event you desire to present a proposal at our 2006 annual
meeting without seeking to have the proposal included in our
proxy statement, our proxies will not be allowed to use their
discretionary voting authority in connection with the proposal
if you provide a written statement to us telling us that you
intend to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders
of at least the percentage of our voting shares required under
applicable law to carry the proposal. The statement must be
provided to us within the time period specified in our bylaws
for the receipt of stockholder notices. Our bylaws provide that
notice of your proposal must be delivered to or mailed and
received at our principal executive offices not less than
90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the annual
meeting. In the event, however, that less than
100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the
date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, to be
timely, your notice must be received by us not later than the
close of business on the 10th day following the day on which the
notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public
disclosure was made, whichever first occurs. Your notice to us
must set forth as to each matter you propose to bring before the
meeting:
|
|
|
| |
• |
A brief description of the business desired to be brought before
the meeting. |
| |
| |
• |
The reasons for conducting the business at the meeting. |
| |
| |
• |
In the event that the business includes a proposal to amend
either our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, the language
of the proposed amendment. |
| |
| |
• |
Your name and address as they appear on our books. |
| |
| |
• |
The number of our shares you own. |
| |
| |
• |
Any material interest you have in the business. |
You also must include the statement in your filed proxy
materials. Immediately after you solicit the percentage of
stockholders required to carry the proposal, you must also
provide us with a statement from a solicitor or other person
with knowledge confirming that the necessary steps have been
taken to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders
of at least the percentage of our voting shares required under
applicable law to carry the proposal. All statements should be
sent in writing to our corporate secretary at the address set
forth on the first page of this proxy statement.
24
Other Matters
We are not aware of any other matters to be presented at the
annual meeting. If any other matter proper for action at the
annual meeting should be properly presented, the proxy holders
will vote the shares represented by the proxy on the matter in
accordance with their best judgment. If any matter not proper
for action at the annual meeting should be presented, the proxy
holders will vote against consideration of the matter or action
on the matter.
|
|
| |
By Order of the Board of Directors |
| |
| |
 |
| |
Secretary, Senior Vice President and General Counsel |
Scottsdale, Arizona
March 16, 2005
25
|
|
|
|
|
| PROXY
|
|
GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
PROXY |
|
|
|
23733 North Scottsdale Road |
|
|
|
|
|
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 |
|
|
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Mark B. Cox and Kim H. Bullerdick, and each of them, are appointed proxies, with full
power of substitution, to vote all of the stock of the undersigned shown on the reverse side hereof
at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Giant Industries, Inc. to be
held on Wednesday, April 27,
2005, or at any postponement or adjournment thereof, with the same effect as if the undersigned
were present and voting the stock on all matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, dated March 16, 2005, and the Proxy Statement, dated March 16, 2005, as directed on
the reverse side hereof.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder. Unless otherwise directed, or if no direction is given, this Proxy will be
voted FOR all of the nominees in Item 1, FOR Item 2, and in accordance with the best judgment of
the proxies or any of them on any other matters which may properly come before the meeting.
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED PREPAID ENVELOPE.
(Continued and to be signed on the other side.)
Giant Industries, Inc.
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN OVAL
IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY.
Å
| |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the nominees listed below and FOR Item 2. |
| |
| 1. |
Election of Directors — |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL
|
|
WITHHOLD ALL
|
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT |
Nominees:
|
|
Anthony J. Bernitsky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George M. Rapport
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
Donald M. Wilkinson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the “For All
Except” box and write that nominee’s name in the space provided below.) |
| 2. |
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP by the Audit Committee as the
independent auditors of the Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2005. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| o FOR
|
|
o AGAINST
|
|
o ABSTAIN |
| 3. |
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may
properly come before the meeting. |
| |
|
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy
Statement. |
| |
|
|
|
|
Dated: , 2005
|
|
Signature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Please date and sign exactly as your name or names appear herein. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity or as corporate officers should so indicate. |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED PREPAID ENVELOPE.