​

​

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.__)

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐   Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒    Definitive Proxy Statement

☐    Definitive Additional Materials

☐    Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

​

AutoZone, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

​

​

Dear Stockholders,

In connection with our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the J.R. Hyde III, Store Support Center in downtown Memphis on December 17^th, 2025, it is my honor to address you, our owners, on key developments that have occurred since our last annual meeting.  

As a reminder, last year for the first time in nearly two decades, our Board of Directors (“Board”) elected a new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Board conducted a rigorous and robust succession planning process which lasted over three years and culminated in the selection of Phil Daniele, who on January 2^nd, 2024, became AutoZone’s fifth CEO in our rich history. As part of the succession planning process, the Board had requested that I assume the role of Executive Chairman where I continue to work with Phil and our talented Executive Committee (the senior most leaders of the management team).  In this capacity, my role was to serve as an advisor, coach, sounding board and mentor – Phil, in his role as President and CEO, is the ultimate decision maker.  These changes resulted in us splitting the roles of Chairman and CEO for the first time since 2007.  

Today, we continue to believe the split role of Chairman and CEO is the best leadership structure for AutoZone. I have thoroughly enjoyed working with Phil in the first year of his CEO tenure and know he is the strong and capable CEO we all expected him to be. Accordingly, the Board has approved my transition from the role of Executive Chairman to Chairman, effective January 2026. Our Board believes in optimizing the structure based on the talents and capabilities of the leadership at the time.

We have also prioritized board succession planning and refreshment, given that our overall tenure in recent years was increasing. At last year’s annual meeting, two of our longer-tenured Board members elected to not stand for re-election. Following their decisions, we began a formal search process led by a third party to identify two new, independent directors. We are pleased to announce that the search was a success resulting in the appointment of Claire McDonough and Constantino Spas Montesinos, two outstanding new directors who we believe bring uniquely valuable perspectives and impressive professional experiences to our Board. We also rotated Committee appointments and Board leadership positions, including naming Brian Hannasch as our new Lead Independent Director and Linda Goodspeed as our new Audit Committee Chair.

Over the course of the last few months, we have held off-season engagement discussions with you, our owners, to discuss recent changes and also to listen to your thoughts and ideas.  We thank you for sharing and continue to take your feedback to heart.  As always, we strive to execute changes in a thoughtful and disciplined manner.

On behalf of the Board, I invite you to join us for our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and as always, we appreciate your investment in us and your continued support.  

Sincerely,

Bill Rhodes

Executive Chairman

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

This Proxy Summary provides general information about AutoZone and highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the entire Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2025 before you vote. In this Proxy Statement, we use the term “AutoZone,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” to refer to AutoZone, Inc.

MEETING INFORMATION

​

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

​

VOTING

We strongly encourage you to submit your vote as promptly as possible through the Internet, by telephone or by mailing your completed and signed proxy card (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or nominee), even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

​

For more specific instructions on how to vote as well as how to attend the Annual Meeting, please see page 72.

ABOUT THESE MATERIALS

We began mailing our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to each shareholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on or about October 28, 2025. Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has sent you this Proxy Statement to solicit your vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

​

Table of Contents

​

* Information reflected as of, and for the fiscal year ended, August 30, 2025, as applicable

Disclaimer: The contents of any websites, reports or other materials are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and do not constitute a part of this proxy statement.

​

Table of Contents

​

Forward Looking Statements: Certain statements contained in this proxy statement, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These are based on assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are discussed in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section contained in Item 1A under Part 1 of the Company’s FY25 Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Table of Contents

Board of Directors Nominees

Table of Contents

BOARD Skills

BOARD COMPOSITION

​

​

Executive Committee AT-A-Glance

AutoZone is committed to continuing to build a diverse organization that represents our customers and the communities in which we serve, because when our store teams mirror the communities they serve, we perform better. This commitment to diversity begins at the top, and we are proud of the quality, strength, experience, tenure and racial, ethnic and gender diversity of both our Board and our Executive Committee.

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

AutoZone has a long-standing commitment to promoting the long-term interests of our customers, AutoZoners and shareholders. In furtherance of this commitment, the Board has adopted a comprehensive governance framework to allow it to provide effective oversight and make informed decisions relating to the business, strategy, risk, culture and more. The following section discusses key aspects of our corporate governance structure, principles and practices.

Governance Framework

Board leadership structure

We do not have an express policy on whether the roles of Board Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be combined or separated. Instead, the Board prefers to maintain the flexibility to determine which leadership structure best serves the interests of our shareholders. If the positions of the Chairman of the Board and CEO are held by the same person, or if the Chairman is employed by or not independent of AutoZone, then the Board will select an independent director to serve as the Lead Independent Director.

Currently, our Board believes that having an Executive Chairman, a Lead Independent Director, Independent Committee Chairs, Independent Committee members for all Standing Committees and a substantial majority of Independent Board members provides the best Board structure for AutoZone. Additionally, the Board believes having an Executive Chairman with a recently appointed CEO allows for a more thoughtful leadership transition among management and at the Board level. This structure, together with our other corporate governance practices, provides strong independent oversight of management while ensuring clear strategic alignment throughout the Company.

The Board has regularly reevaluated this leadership structure as part of the Board evaluation and Board succession planning processes to ensure these important governance matters are considered thoroughly and holistically. As part of this review, the Board has approved the transition of Mr. Rhodes from his current role of Executive Chairman to the role of Chairman, effective January 2026.

Lead Independent Director

​

Table of Contents

Director independence

As stated in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, a substantial majority of the Board of Directors should be independent in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Board annually assesses each director’s independence after reviewing relevant relationships involving the director and AutoZone. As part of this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board considered all such relationships involving AutoZone’s non-employee directors, including the below matters.

Ordinary Course Transactions and Business Relationships. The Company routinely procures goods or services from, or sells parts and products to, various entities for which a director or his or her immediate family member may be affiliated. During FY25, all such transactions were conducted in the ordinary course of business and on an arms-length basis.

Current or Prior Employment of Immediate Family Member. Directors may have an immediate family member who is an AutoZoner. In FY25, all such employment relationships were in a non-officer capacity and all compensation-related decisions were made in a manner that is consistent with internal practices and policies.

Charitable Contributions or Event Sponsorships. The Company periodically makes donations to not-for-profit organizations or sponsors events with which Board members or their immediate family members may be affiliated. During FY25, all such contributions were conducted in the ordinary course of business and consistent with AutoZone’s charitable giving guidelines or otherwise in furtherance of a business purpose.

As such, the Board concluded that none of these transactions were, individually or cumulatively, material to AutoZone and also did not materially benefit any director, directly or indirectly. Accordingly, the Board affirmatively determined that none of Mses. Goodspeed, King, McDonough or Soltau or Messrs. George, Graves, Hannasch, Mrkonic or Spas has a material relationship with the Company other than in their capacities as Board members and that all of them are independent within the meaning of the AutoZone Corporate Governance Principles, the NYSE listing standards and applicable law. The Board also determined that Messrs. Rhodes and Daniele are not independent since each is an employee of the Company.

COMMITTEES. AutoZone’s Board has three standing committees, each consisting solely of independent directors—the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Additional information about each of the Standing Committees is included below.

GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS. The key governance documents and policies adopted by the Board are:

Table of Contents

The Board reviews these corporate governance documents and policies from time to time and revises them when it believes it serves the interests of the Company and its shareholders to do so, such as in response to changing governance practices or legal requirements. For example, in FY2024, following the CEO succession, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, together with input and feedback from all Board members, conducted a thorough review and update of the Corporate Governance Principles. In FY25, the Board amended its Bylaws to reduce the threshold necessary to call a special meeting of shareholders, consistent with the feedback and majority vote received at last year’s annual meeting. Also in FY25, the charters of each of its Standing Committees to reflect evolving expectations from investors and other stakeholders. For example, the Audit Committee Charter now states the committee shall oversee the Company’s practices with respect to cybersecurity, information security and service continuity, as well as the steps taken to monitor or mitigate risks in these areas—a practice that was already in effect and has now been memorialized in the charter. Each of these documents is available on our website at investors.autozone.com and is also available, free of charge, in print to any shareholder who requests it.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS. As part of our commitment to continuous improvement and maximizing long-term shareholder value, the Company remains committed to corporate responsibility. Our 2025 Corporate Responsibility Report (CRR) is available on our website at www.investors.autozone.com.

Our website and the information contained therein or linked thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Proxy Statement. Further, our CRR is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement or incorporated by reference herein or into any of our other filings with the SEC.

Risk Oversight

Oversight of risk management is a responsibility of the Board and is an integral part of the Board’s oversight of AutoZone’s business. The primary responsibility for the identification, assessment and management of the various risks faced by AutoZone resides with AutoZone’s management. The Board is primarily responsible for ensuring that management has established and adequately resourced processes for identifying and preparing the Company to manage risks effectively.

Strategic Planning and Operating Risks

The Board reviews the Company’s principal strategic and operating risks as part of its regular discussion and consideration of AutoZone’s strategy and operating results. The Board also regularly reviews with the General Counsel legal matters that may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with laws, and any material reports received from regulatory agencies.

Financial Risks

The Audit Committee plays a key role in the Board’s oversight of risk management. At each of its regular meetings, the Audit Committee reviews the Company’s major financial exposures and the steps management has taken to identify, assess, monitor, control, remediate and report such exposures. The Audit Committee, along with management, also evaluates the effectiveness of the risk avoidance and mitigation processes in place and reports its findings to the full Board as part of the Board’s overall consideration of risks facing AutoZone.

Enterprise Risks

To assist with risk management and oversight, AutoZone has adopted the concept of Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) using the framework issued in 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s Vice President of Internal Audit, who reports directly to the Audit Committee, leads the Company’s ERM processes with the assistance of Company management. The Vice President of Internal Audit presents to the Audit Committee a comprehensive review of the Company’s ERM processes quarterly. This presentation includes an overview of all significant risks that have been identified and assessed and strategies developed by management for managing such risks. The Vice President of Internal Audit leads open discussions with the Audit Committee members to analyze the significance of the risks identified and seeks to verify that the list is all-inclusive. Company management is also involved in these discussions to ensure that the Board gains a full understanding of the risks and strategies that management has implemented to manage the risks.

​

Table of Contents

Cybersecurity and Related Risks

The Audit Committee, in connection with its oversight of the Company’s ERM processes described above, reviews and discusses the Company’s cybersecurity risks directly with the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer. Specifically, they review the Company’s practices with respect to cybersecurity, information security and service continuity and the steps taken to monitor or mitigate such risks. This review takes place at each routine, quarterly committee meeting and includes a discussion of significant threats, risk mitigation strategies, any IT security program assessments and identified improvements. Additionally, such matters are included within a broader IT update which is periodically presented to the full Board of Directors.

Corporate Responsibility

The Board exercises its oversight of corporate responsibility matters both as a full Board and through its committees depending on the subject matter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has primary responsibility for assisting the Board in overseeing human capital management matters, whereas the Compensation Committee oversees the alignment between AutoZone’s compensation programs and human capital management strategy. Environmental risk is currently a matter of shared oversight. For example, reporting of initiatives and goals relating to our greenhouse gas emissions is overseen by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee; oversight of environmental-related compliance is overseen by the Audit Committee; and to the extent environmental matters present a strategic risk or opportunity, such issues are overseen by the full Board. Each of the Standing Committees provides updates and feedback on these matters to the full Board for its collective review and discussion.

​

Table of Contents

Board and Committee Meetings

Board Meetings and Attendance

During FY25, the Board held 4 meetings. The independent members of our Board regularly meet in executive sessions in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting, with our Lead Independent Director, Mr. Hannasch, presiding at these sessions. Additionally, non-independent directors meet regularly with our Chair presiding and the non-independent directors meet periodically with our Chair and CEO separately. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and their assigned committees during FY25. All directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of shareholders. At our 2024 Annual Meeting, all directors standing for election were present and available to answer questions.

Audit Committee

​

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee

​

NOMINating and corporate governance Committee

​

Table of Contents

Board Composition

Personal Characteristics and Core Competencies

The Board believes each individual director should possess certain personal characteristics, and that the Board as a whole should possess certain core competencies. Such personal characteristics are integrity and accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy, mature confidence, high performance standards, and passion. They should also have demonstrated the confidence to be truly independent, as well as be business savvy, have an owner orientation and have a genuine interest in AutoZone. Core competencies of the Board as a whole, include accounting and finance, business judgment, management expertise, crisis response, industry knowledge, international markets, strategy and vision. These characteristics and competencies are set forth in more detail in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on AutoZone’s website at investors.autozone.com.

DIRECTOR SKILLS

The Board believes it can be most effective in exercising its responsibilities when it is made up of individuals who collectively possess a diverse, yet balanced, set of skills, qualifications and expertise gained from different experiences and professional settings. As such, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the skills represented on the Board, which then provides a foundation for Board refreshment, Board succession planning and director nominations.

In 2023, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee refreshed its method of reviewing and evaluating Board skills in an effort to (i) develop a more meaningful skills matrix that reflects each individual’s strengths and expertise and (ii) better communicate to shareholders the key qualifications that each director nominee brings to the Board. In doing so, the Committee identified a certain set of “core skills” which nearly all directors possess because these skills are integral to carrying out the Board’s responsibilities. In addition to these “core skills,” the Committee identified certain “distinct strengths” which our directors possess. These strengths allow our Board, as a whole, to offer a comprehensive set of experiences, perspectives and expertise to guide our decision making. In some instances, we have intentionally sought more candidates with a specific attribute, such as CEO experience or retail industry experience, because such experience is particularly relevant to our business and valuable to our Board. In other instances, we have considered a candidate as a whole and concluded that he or she presents a variety of strengths that add to the richness of our Board. As a result, we may have a larger number of Board members with a particular strength or attribute; but it is our belief that all of these skills and experiences are of value and together allow for more thoughtful dialog and more effective execution of Board responsibilities.

Table of Contents

​

​

​

Table of Contents

BOARD DIVERSITY

Consistent with AutoZone’s Pledge and Values, the Board embraces diversity in its broadest sense and believes it is important to have directors with diverse thoughts, skills, knowledge and backgrounds.

​

Board Refreshment

The Board has a variety of mechanisms in place to promote Board refreshment in a manner that we believe is well aligned with the long-term interests of AutoZone and its shareholders. In particular, the Board relies upon thorough and meaningful evaluations as well as a resignation policy in the event a director experiences a change in professional role or responsibility.

The Board does not have an age-based or tenure-based resignation policy. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and full Board reconsidered the issue in FY23. After extensive discussion on the topic, the Board continues to believe a rigid numerical policy in either of these areas cannot adequately assess an individual director’s contribution, engagement and value to the overall effectiveness of the Board. Instead, we believe thoughtful succession planning and reflection of the Board’s overall composition allow us to refresh the makeup of the Board in a more organic and intentional manner. In fact, this commitment to refreshment is evidenced by the fact that we have had eight directors choose not to stand for reelection over the last decade, and five of our eleven directors have served for less than five years.

Table of Contents

​

Director Tenure. The Board regularly considers the tenure of our independent directors, noting that Mr. Graves and Mr. Mrkonic have each served on the Board for greater than 15 years. Mr. Graves brings a wealth of experience and historical knowledge regarding the Board and how it has been most effective in executing its oversight responsibilities. Mr. Mrkonic has a deep understanding of both the Company as well as the retail industry as a whole, allowing him to challenge the status quo and offer insightful perspectives on matters of strategy, operations and corporate governance. For these reasons, the Board believes each of Mr. Graves and Mr. Mrkonic continues to be a valued member of the Board.

AutoZone has historically had a very tenured management team as is the case today. Just as we believe that a “tenured” management team is a huge asset and key contributor of our tremendous success in delivering returns in excess of 15% compounded annually when measured over a 10, 20 or even 30-year period, we also believe having seasoned Board members is equally important. Similarly, our tenure on the management team could become a weakness if we didn’t successfully recruit new AutoZoners who have differentiated skills and experiences, as evidenced by five Executive Committee members with tenure of five years or less. We have the same beliefs on our Board composition—that a strong mix of seasoned Board members and fresh perspectives provides for optimal effectiveness. As we work through Board succession and overall tenure, we don’t simply apply a first-in-first-out methodology. Instead, we thoughtfully explore the skills, contributions and experiences we believe are most important in the ensuing years while also ensuring we have sufficient objectivity, freshness of perspectives and independence. This philosophy is evidenced by the appointment of Ms. McDonough and Mr. Spas, who were appointed to the Board this past year after two directors chose not to stand for re-election at our last annual meeting.

Board Evaluations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and approves the process by which the Board, its Committees and the individual directors conduct an evaluation. These evaluations help inform Board succession planning as well as contribute to different enhancements that may allow the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities more effectively. The annual Board and Committee evaluation process, including in FY25, is typically administered by the Corporate Secretary’s office. Additionally, the Board has routinely engaged a third-party consultant to administer an enhanced process every few years to obtain more detailed and specific feedback on individual member and overall board effectiveness. For example, for the fourth time in the past 12 years, at the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board evaluation was administered by an independent, third-party in FY24 and consisted of both survey data and one-on-one interviews. These findings were then aggregated, analyzed and reported to the full Board collectively and specific feedback was provided to each individual director. These qualitative and quantitative assessments provide detailed feedback to each director on their strengths and opportunities for enhanced contributions. They also facilitate more open dialog regarding directors’ intentions on service and serve as a key tool to Board succession planning.

​

Table of Contents

Director Nominations

Prior to each annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers incumbent directors and other qualified individuals, if appropriate, as potential director nominees. In evaluating a potential nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the personal characteristics described above, reviews the composition of the full Board and reflects upon learnings from the Board evaluations to determine the areas of expertise and core competencies needed to enhance the effectiveness of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board also consider the specific experiences and skills that an individual nominee possesses and how such experiences might be of value to the Board and the management team. Finally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider other factors such as the size of the Board, whether a candidate is independent, the listing standards requirements of the NYSE and how many other public company directorships a candidate holds.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying potential nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current Board members, shareholders or other persons. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may retain a search firm or other consulting firm from time to time to identify potential nominees. Nominees recommended by shareholders in accordance with the procedure described below, i.e., submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Corporate Secretary, accompanied by the biographical and business experience information regarding the nominee and the other information required by Article III, Section 1 of AutoZone’s Ninth Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”), will receive the same consideration as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s other potential nominees.

​

Director Nominations by Shareholders

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s policy is to consider director candidate recommendations from shareholders if they are submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Corporate Secretary in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article III, Section 1 of the By-Laws, including biographical and business experience, information regarding the nominee and other information required by such provision in the By-laws. Copies of the By-Laws will be provided upon written request to AutoZone’s Corporate Secretary and are also available on AutoZone’s website at investors.autozone.com.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under AutoZone’s By-laws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than AutoZone’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) no later than October 18, 2026.

​

Table of Contents

Director Compensation

AutoZone’s current director compensation program became effective January 1, 2024 (the “Director Compensation Program”).

Annual Retainer Fees. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer fee (the “Annual Retainer”). Furthermore, each director is eligible to receive an additional fee (“Additional Fee”), the amount of which varies depending on his or her role. The Additional Fees and the Annual Retainer, enumerated below, together comprise the “Director Compensation”. There are no meeting fees.

​

​

Under the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Award Plan (the “2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) and Director Compensation Program, non-employee directors receive Director Compensation in the form of immediately vested Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). A non-employee director may elect to receive a fixed portion of the Annual Retainer plus any Additional Fees in the form of cash, paid in quarterly installments (the “Cash Election”), with the remainder of the Annual Retainer paid in the form of RSUs. The Cash Election during calendar year 2025 was $100,000 but all directors elected to receive compensation fully in RSUs. RSUs are typically granted on January 1 of the applicable calendar years.

If a non-employee director is elected to the Board or assumes a different position after January 1, he or she will receive the Annual Retainer and/or Additional Fees, prorated based on the number of days remaining in the calendar year, for RSUs, or the number of days remaining in the quarter, for cash, as applicable.

RSUs granted to non-employee directors are fully vested on the date of grant and become payable, or are settled, on the date on which the non-employee director ceases to be a director (the “Payment Date”), or at the director’s election, on the first or fifth anniversary of the grant date. Upon timely delivery of an election form, a non-employee director may elect to receive payment on the date on which he or she ceases to be a director. RSUs are payable in shares of AutoZone common stock no later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the tax year in which such Payment Date occurs.

Beginning in January 2026, Mr. Rhodes is expected to receive $250,000 annually in the form of immediately vested restricted stock units for his service as Chairman of the Board. There currently is not a separate grant for the Board Chairman as Mr. Rhodes holds the role of Executive Chairman.

Director Compensation Table

This table shows the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the 2025 fiscal year.

​

​

​

Table of Contents

​

COMPENSATION-SETTING PROCESS. The Compensation Committee reviews the Board’s compensation on a biennial basis to ensure that non-employee directors are reasonably compensated in relation to AutoZone’s peer group companies (discussed in detail under Benchmarking) and to comparable U.S. companies in general. AutoZone’s 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan contains a dollar limit of $750,000 on the total amount of annual compensation payable to its non-employee directors, provided that the Board may make exceptions to this limit under extraordinary circumstances.

Stock Ownership Requirement. The Board has established a stock ownership requirement for non-employee directors. Each director is required to own AutoZone common stock and/or RSUs having a cumulative fair market value in an amount equal to seven times the value of the cash Annual Retainer payable pursuant to the Director Compensation Program within five years of joining the Board, and to maintain such ownership level thereafter. Exceptions to this requirement may only be made by the Board under compelling mitigating circumstances. Shares, Stock Units and RSUs issued under the AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan, the 2003 Director Compensation Plan, the 2011 Equity Plan, the Amended 2011 Equity Plan and the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan count toward this requirement. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, each director meets or exceeds his or her obligations under the requirement.

OTHER PREDECESSOR PLANS. The AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan was terminated in December 2002 and was replaced by the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director Compensation Plan (the “2003 Director Compensation Plan”) and the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Director Stock Option Plan”). The 2003 Director Compensation Plan and the 2003 Director Stock Option Plan were terminated in December 2010 and replaced by the 2011 Equity Plan. The 2011 Equity Plan was terminated in December 2015 and replaced with the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. In December 2020, shareholders approved the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan and no further grants have been made under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. However, grants made under those plans continue in effect under the terms of the grant made and are included in the aggregate awards outstanding shown above.

​

Table of Contents

Shareholder Engagement

At AutoZone, we have long believed maintaining a strong and transparent relationship with our shareholders is essential. We have always been committed to engaging with our shareholders on key issues, including board composition, leadership transitions, executive compensation and governance practices. We believe our engagement efforts allow us to better understand the priorities, perspectives, and concerns of our shareholders, strengthen our relationships with our shareholders and make more informed decisions for the benefit of our shareholders.

Engagement Team. Our engagement team typically includes one or more of our Executive Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Vice President of Investor Relations. However, depending on the specific topic that our investors may wish to discuss, we may have independent members of the Board, other members of our Executive Committee or internal subject-matter leaders participate.

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Engagement Framework. Our engagement program has evolved over the years, consistent with the expectations of our investors. Historically, we have taken a more organic approach to shareholder engagement, primarily focused on financial performance and long-term strategy. In recent years, we invited shareholders to discuss governance or corporate responsibility topics with us, with the majority of these calls occurring “off-season” or not in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders. Today, we have a more intentional and proactive approach to shareholder engagement, in which we both invite and seek feedback and perspectives on a variety of topics during the year. We believe these various engagement efforts, whether they are part of a broad-based discussion or the result of a targeted outreach effort we have initiated, are invaluable as they allow us to better understand the priorities, perspectives and suggestions or concerns of our shareholders, strengthen our relationships and make more informed decisions for their benefit.

​

Recent Actions in Response to Shareholder Feedback. Below is a sample of new or revised practices we’ve adopted in direct response to feedback we’ve received from our shareholders.

​

FY25 Shareholder Engagement—Governance. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, we invited our top shareholders to a general structured discussion on a variety of topics as well as any other feedback or suggestions they might have for the Board to consider.

​

Table of Contents

Procedure for Communication with the Board of Directors

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing to the Board, to any individual director or to the non-management directors as a group c/o Corporate Secretary, AutoZone, Inc., 123 South Front Street, Dept. 8074, Memphis, Tennessee 38103. The Company’s General Counsel and Corporate Secretary will review all such correspondence and will forward correspondence that, in her opinion, deals with the function of the Board or that she otherwise determines requires the attention of any member, group or committee of the Board. Communications addressed to the Board or to the non-management directors as a group, and determined by the Company’s General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to merit their attention, will be forwarded to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and communications addressed to a committee of the Board, and determined by the Company’s General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to merit their attention, will be forwarded to the chair of that committee.

Related Party Transactions

Our Board has adopted a Related Person Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) which requires the Audit Committee of the Board to conduct a reasonable prior review of, and approve or ratify, all Related Person Transactions. The Audit Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances of each transaction, including but not limited to the benefits to the Company; the impact on a director’s independence in the event the Related Person is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer; the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; the terms of the transaction; the terms available to unrelated third parties generally and the existence of any potential conflicts of interest. The Policy further provides that the Audit Committee shall not approve or ratify any such transaction it determines to be inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its shareholders. Related Person Transactions must also comply with the policies and procedures specified in our Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance Principles, as described below.

The Policy also requires disclosure of all Related Person Transactions that are required to be disclosed in AutoZone’s filings with the SEC, in accordance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

A “Related Person Transaction” is defined in the Policy as a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) that occurred since the beginning of the Company’s most recent fiscal year in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. “Related Persons” include a director or executive officer of the Company, a nominee to become a director of the Company, any person known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to the Company’s directors, officers and other AutoZoners. The Code of Conduct prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in activities that create conflicts of interest, taking corporate opportunities for personal use or competing with the Company, among other things. Our Board has also adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives (the “Financial Code of Conduct”) that applies to the Company’s officers and employees who hold the position of principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller as well as to the Company’s officers and other AutoZoners who perform similar functions (“Financial Executives”). The Financial Code of Conduct requires the Financial Executives to, among other things, report any actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal or professional relationships involving the Company’s management or any other AutoZoner with a role in financial reporting disclosures or internal controls. Additionally, our Corporate Governance Principles require each director who is faced with an issue that presents, or may give the appearance of presenting, a conflict of interest to disclose that fact to the Chairman of the Board and the Corporate Secretary, and to refrain from participating in discussions or votes on such issue unless a majority of the Board determines, after consultation with counsel, that no conflict of interest exists as to such matter.

Table of Contents

We have concluded there are no material Related Party Transactions or agreements that were entered into during the fiscal year ended August 30, 2025, and through the date of this proxy statement requiring disclosure under these policies.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board of AutoZone, Inc. has reviewed and discussed AutoZone’s audited financial statements for the year ended August 30, 2025 with AutoZone’s management. In addition, we have discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No.1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as amended and as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the charter of the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee also has received the written disclosures and letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and we have discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee has discussed with AutoZone’s management and the auditing firm such other matters and received such assurances from them as the Committee deemed appropriate.

As a result of our review and discussions, we have recommended to the Board the inclusion of AutoZone’s audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2025 for filing with the SEC.

While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AutoZone’s financial statements are complete, accurate, or in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); AutoZone’s management and the independent auditor have this responsibility. Nor does the Audit Committee have the duty to assure compliance with laws and regulations and the policies of the Board.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

Linda A. Goodspeed (Chair)

Michael A. George

Claire R. McDonough

George R. Mrkonic, Jr.

Constantino Spas Montesinos

​

Table of Contents

THE PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL 1: Election of 11 Directors

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. Elect 11 director nominees. Each director shall serve for a 1-year term, until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

VOTES REQUIRED. The election of directors at this 2025 Annual Meeting is an uncontested election. As such, a director nominee is elected to the Board if the number of votes cast FOR such nominee exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST such nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to this matter and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1. If the number of nominees were to exceed the number of directors to be elected, for example in a contested election, directors would be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

IMPACT OF VOTE. Each of these nominees has consented to serve if elected. Should any nominee be unavailable to serve, your proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee recommended by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors on the Board.

Pursuant to AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, incumbent directors must agree to tender their resignation if they fail to receive more votes for, than votes against, their reelection. In such event, the Board will act within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote to determine whether to accept the director’s resignation. These procedures are described in more detail in our Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on our website at www.investors.autozone.com. The Board may consider any factors it deems relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation. If a director’s resignation offer is not accepted by the Board, that director will continue to serve until AutoZone’s next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal.

Any director nominee who is not an incumbent director and who does not receive a majority vote in an uncontested election will not be elected as a director, and a vacancy will be left on the Board. The Board, in its sole discretion, may either fill a vacancy resulting from a director nominee not receiving a majority vote pursuant to the By-Laws or decrease the size of the Board to eliminate the vacancy.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION. Each of the nominees named below currently serve as a director, and, other than Ms. McDonough and Mr. Spas who were newly appointed to the Board in FY25, was elected as a director at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders. As part of the Board’s determination to nominate these existing directors for reelection, the Board has determined that each of the directors has valuable experiences, skills and qualifications necessary to carry out their responsibilities effectively.