Please wait
Exhibit (a)(1)(A)
Offer to Purchase for
Cash
All Outstanding Shares of
Common Stock
(including the associated
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights)
of
GENESIS MICROCHIP
INC.
at
$8.65 NET PER SHARE
by
SOPHIA ACQUISITION
CORP.,
a wholly owned subsidiary
of
STMICROELECTRONICS
N.V.
THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 12:00
MIDNIGHT, NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON JANUARY 16, 2008, UNLESS THE
OFFER IS EXTENDED
THE OFFER IS BEING MADE PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER DATED AS OF DECEMBER 10, 2007 (THE
“MERGER AGREEMENT”) AMONG STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.
(“PARENT”), SOPHIA ACQUISITION CORP
(“PURCHASER”) AND GENESIS MICROCHIP INC. (THE
“COMPANY”). THE OFFER IS CONDITIONED UPON, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, (I) THERE HAVING BEEN VALIDLY TENDERED AND NOT
WITHDRAWN PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER AT LEAST THE
NUMBER OF SHARES (AS DEFINED HEREIN) THAT SHALL CONSTITUTE A
MAJORITY OF THE SUM OF (A) ALL SHARES OUTSTANDING AS OF THE
SCHEDULED EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER AND (B) ALL SHARES
ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE, CONVERSION OR EXCHANGE OF ALL
COMPANY STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER RIGHTS TO ACQUIRE SHARES
OUTSTANDING AS OF THE SCHEDULED EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER, LESS
(C) ANY SHARES ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE OF ANY COMPANY
STOCK OPTION (X) NOT EXERCISABLE ON OR PRIOR TO MAY 15,
2008 OR (Y) WITH AN EXERCISE PRICE GREATER THAN $10.50 PER
SHARE (THE MAJORITY OF SUCH SUM, THE “MINIMUM
CONDITION”) AND (II) ANY WAITING PERIODS UNDER THE
HART-SCOTT-RODINO
ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976, AS AMENDED (THE “HSR
ACT”), AND THE ANTITRUST LAWS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC
OF CHINA, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE REPUBLIC OF
HUNGARY AND THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA HAVING EXPIRED OR BEEN
TERMINATED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER (THE
“ANTITRUST CONDITION”). THE OFFER IS ALSO SUBJECT TO
CERTAIN OTHER CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS OFFER TO PURCHASE.
SEE SECTIONS 1 AND 14, WHICH SET FORTH IN FULL THE
CONDITIONS TO THE OFFER. THE OFFER IS NOT CONDITIONED UPON
PARENT OR PURCHASER OBTAINING FINANCING PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION
OF THE OFFER.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY HAS UNANIMOUSLY
DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING EACH OF THE OFFER AND THE MERGER
(EACH AS DEFINED HEREIN), ARE FAIR TO AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS
OF THE HOLDERS OF SHARES. HAS APPROVED AND AUTHORIZED THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING
EACH OF THE OFFER AND THE MERGER, AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE
HOLDERS OF SHARES ACCEPT THE OFFER AND TENDER THEIR SHARES
PURSUANT TO THE OFFER.
IMPORTANT
Any stockholder desiring to tender all or any portion of such
stockholder’s Shares should either (i) complete and
sign the accompanying Letter of Transmittal (or a manually
signed facsimile thereof) in accordance with the instructions in
the Letter of Transmittal and mail or deliver it together with
the certificate(s) evidencing tendered Shares, and any other
required documents, to the Depositary or tender such Shares
pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer set forth in
Section 3 or (ii) request such stockholder’s
broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee
to effect the transaction for such stockholder. Any stockholder
whose Shares are registered in the name of a broker, dealer,
commercial bank, trust company or other nominee must contact
such broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other
nominee if such stockholder desires to tender such Shares.
A stockholder who desires to tender Shares and whose
certificates evidencing such Shares are not immediately
available, or who cannot comply with the procedure for
book-entry transfer on a timely basis, may tender such Shares by
following the procedure for guaranteed delivery set forth in
Section 3.
Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the
Information Agent or to the Dealer Manager at their respective
addresses and telephone numbers set forth on the back cover of
this Offer to Purchase. Additional copies of this Offer to
Purchase, the Letter of Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery may also be obtained from the Information Agent or from
brokers, dealers, commercial banks or trust companies.
The Dealer Manager for the Offer is:
Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated
December 18, 2007
This summary term sheet highlights selected information from
this Offer to Purchase, and may not contain all of the
information that is important to you. To better understand our
offer to you and for a complete description of the legal terms
of the Offer, you should read this Offer to Purchase and the
accompanying Letter of Transmittal carefully and in their
entirety. Questions or requests for assistance may be directed
to the Information Agent or the Dealer Manager at their
respective addresses and telephone numbers on the last page of
this Offer to Purchase.
WHO IS
OFFERING TO BUY MY SECURITIES?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We are Sophia Acquisition Corp., a newly formed Delaware
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of STMicroelectronics
N.V. We have been organized in connection with this Offer and
have not carried on any activities other than in connection with
this Offer. See Section 8.
|
| |
| |
•
|
STMicroelectronics N.V. is a global independent semiconductor
company that designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad
range of semiconductor products used in a wide variety of
microelectronic applications, including automotive products,
computer peripherals, telecommunications systems, consumer
products, industrial automation and control systems.
|
WHAT ARE
THE CLASSES AND AMOUNTS OF SECURITIES SOUGHT IN THIS
OFFER?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We are seeking to purchase all the issued and outstanding shares
of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Genesis
Microchip, together with the associated preferred stock purchase
rights. See the “Introduction” and Section 1.
|
HOW MUCH
ARE YOU OFFERING TO PAY AND WHAT IS THE FORM OF
PAYMENT?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We are offering to pay $8.65 per share in cash, without interest
and less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and
subject to the conditions contained in this Offer to Purchase
and in the related Letter of Transmittal. If you are the record
owner of your shares and you tender your shares in the offer,
you will not have to pay any brokerage fees or similar expenses.
If you own your shares through a broker or other nominee, and
your broker tenders your shares on your behalf, your broker or
nominee may charge a fee for doing so. You should consult your
broker or nominee to determine whether any charges will apply.
See “Introduction,” Section 1 and Section 5.
|
WHAT ARE
THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We are not obligated to purchase any shares unless there have
been validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration
of the offer at least the number of shares that shall constitute
a majority of the sum of (a) all Shares outstanding as of
the scheduled expiration of the Offer and (b) all Shares
issuable upon the exercise, conversion or exchange of all
Company stock options and other rights to acquire Shares
outstanding as of the scheduled expiration of the Offer, less
(c) any Shares issuable upon the exercise of any Company
stock option (x) not exercisable on or prior to
May 15, 2008 or (y) with an exercise price greater
than $10.50 per share (the majority of such sum is referred to
in this Offer to Purchase as the “Minimum Condition”).
See Section 1 and Section 14.
|
| |
| |
•
|
We are not obligated to purchase any shares unless prior to the
expiration of the Offer any applicable waiting period under the
HSR Act or certain foreign antitrust laws has expired or been
terminated (the “Antitrust Condition”). See
Section 15.
|
These and other conditions to our obligations to purchase shares
tendered in the Offer are described in greater detail in
Sections 1 and 14.
DO YOU
HAVE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO MAKE PAYMENT?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Yes. STMicroelectronics N.V. will provide us with the funds
necessary to purchase the shares in the Offer. See
Section 9.
|
ii
IS YOUR
FINANCIAL CONDITION RELEVANT TO MY DECISION TO TENDER IN THE
OFFER?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Because the form of payment consists solely of cash and all of
the funding which will be needed has already been arranged, and
also because of the lack of any relevant historical information
concerning Sophia Acquisition Corp., we do not think the
financial condition of Sophia Acquisition Corp. is relevant to
your decision to tender in the Offer.
|
HOW LONG
DO I HAVE TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TENDER IN THE OFFER?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
You will have at least until 12:00 midnight, New York City time,
on January 16, 2008, to decide whether to tender your
shares in the offer. If you cannot deliver everything that is
required in order to make a valid tender by that time, you may
be able to use a guaranteed delivery procedure which is
described in Section 3 of this Offer to Purchase. See
Section 3.
|
CAN THE
OFFER BE EXTENDED, AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
If any of the conditions to the Offer set forth in
Section 14 hereto have not been satisfied at a scheduled
expiration date, as extended by us, we are obligated to extend
the Offer for successive periods of not more than ten business
days until such time as either (i) all of the conditions to
the Offer have been satisfied or waived or (ii) the Merger
Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions therein.
|
| |
| |
•
|
In addition, we may extend the offer for a subsequent offering
period of not less than three business days nor more than 20
business days. You will not have withdrawal rights during any
subsequent offering period. See Section 1 and
Section 2.
|
HOW WILL
I BE NOTIFIED IF THE OFFER IS EXTENDED?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
If we decide to extend the offer, or if we decide to provide for
a subsequent offering period, we will inform Mellon Investor
Services LLC, the Depositary, of that fact, and will issue a
press release giving the new expiration date no later than
9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the next business day
after the day on which the Offer was previously scheduled to
expire. See Section 1.
|
HOW DO I
TENDER MY SHARES?
To tender your shares in the Offer, you must:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
complete and sign the accompanying Letter of Transmittal (or a
manually signed facsimile of the Letter of Transmittal) in
accordance with the instructions in the Letter of Transmittal
and mail or deliver it together with your share certificates,
and any other required documents, to the Depositary;
|
| |
| |
•
|
tender your shares pursuant to the procedure for book-entry
transfer set forth in Section 3; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
if your share certificates are not immediately available or if
you cannot deliver your share certificates, and any other
required documents, to Mellon Investor Services LLC prior to the
expiration of the offer, or you cannot complete the procedure
for delivery by book-entry transfer on a timely basis, you may
still tender your shares if you comply with the guaranteed
delivery procedures described in Section 3.
|
UNTIL
WHAT TIME CAN I WITHDRAW PREVIOUSLY TENDERED SHARES?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
You may withdraw previously tendered shares any time prior to
the expiration of the Offer, and, unless we have accepted the
shares pursuant to the Offer, you may also withdraw any tendered
shares at any time after February 16, 2008. Shares tendered
during the subsequent offering period, if any, may not be
withdrawn. See Section 4.
|
HOW DO I
WITHDRAW PREVIOUSLY TENDERED SHARES?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
To withdraw previously tendered shares, you must deliver a
written or facsimile notice of withdrawal with the required
information to Mellon Investor Services LLC while you still have
the right to withdraw. If you
|
iii
|
|
|
| |
|
tendered shares by giving instructions to a broker or bank, you
must instruct the broker or bank to arrange for the withdrawal
of your shares. See Section 4.
|
WHAT DOES
GENESIS MICROCHIP’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The Board of Directors of Genesis Microchip has unanimously
determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including each of the Offer and the
Merger, are fair to and in the best interests of the holders of
Shares, has approved and authorized the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including each of the Offer
and the Merger, and recommends that the holders of Shares accept
the Offer and tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer. See
“Introduction.”
|
WILL
GENESIS MICROCHIP CONTINUE AS A PUBLIC COMPANY?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
If the Merger occurs, Genesis Microchip will no longer be
publicly owned. Even if the Merger does not occur, if we
purchase all the tendered shares, there may be so few remaining
stockholders and publicly held shares that the shares will no
longer be eligible to be traded through Nasdaq or other
securities markets, there may not be a public trading market for
the shares and Genesis Microchip may cease making filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise cease being
required to comply with Securities and Exchange Commission rules
relating to publicly held companies. See Section 13.
|
WILL THE
TENDER OFFER BE FOLLOWED BY A MERGER IF ALL THE SHARES ARE NOT
TENDERED?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
If we accept for payment and pay for any Shares, we intend to
merge with and into Genesis Microchip. If the Merger occurs,
Genesis Microchip will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
STMicroelectronics N.V., and each issued and then outstanding
share (other than any shares held in the treasury of Genesis
Microchip, or owned by STMicroelectronics N.V., Sophia
Acquisition Corp. or any of their subsidiaries or any subsidiary
of Genesis Microchip and any shares held by stockholders seeking
appraisal for their shares) shall be canceled and converted
automatically into the right to receive $8.65 per share in cash
(or any greater amount per share paid pursuant to the Offer),
without interest. See the “Introduction.”
|
IF I
DECIDE NOT TO TENDER, HOW WILL THE OFFER AFFECT MY
SHARES?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
If you decide not to tender your shares in the Offer and the
Merger occurs, you will receive in the Merger the same amount of
cash per share as if you had tendered your shares in the offer.
|
| |
| |
•
|
If you decide not to tender your Shares in the Offer and the
Merger does not occur, and we purchase all the tendered shares,
there may be so few remaining stockholders and publicly held
Shares that the Shares will no longer be eligible to be traded
through the Nasdaq Global Market or other securities markets,
there may not be a public trading market for the Shares and
Genesis Microchip may cease making filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission or otherwise cease being required to
comply with Securities and Exchange Commission rules relating to
publicly held companies. See Section 13.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Following the Offer it is possible that the Shares might no
longer constitute “margin securities” for purposes of
the margin regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, in which
case your Shares may no longer be used as collateral for loans
made by brokers. See Section 13.
|
WHAT IS
THE MARKET VALUE OF MY SHARES AS OF A RECENT DATE?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
On December 10, 2007, the last full trading day before we
announced our offer, the last reported closing price per share
reported on the Nasdaq Global Market was $5.40 per share. See
Section 7.
|
WITH WHOM
MAY I TALK IF I HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE OFFER?
|
|
|
| |
•
|
You can call Innisfree M&A Incorporated, the Information
Agent, at
(212) 750-5833
or
(888) 750-5834
or Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, the Dealer
Manager, at
(877) 247-9865.
See the back cover of this Offer to Purchase.
|
iv
To the Holders of Common Stock of
Genesis Microchip Inc.:
Sophia Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
(“Purchaser”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of
STMicroelectronics N.V., a limited liability company organized
under the laws of the Netherlands, with its corporate seat in
Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Parent”), hereby offers
to purchase all the issued and outstanding shares of common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common
Stock”), including the associated preferred stock purchase
rights (the “Rights”, and together with the Common
Stock, the “Shares”), of Genesis Microchip Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that are issued
and outstanding for $8.65 per Share, net to the seller in cash,
without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes, upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Offer
to Purchase and in the related Letter of Transmittal (which,
together with this Offer to Purchase and any amendments or
supplements hereto or thereto, collectively constitute the
“Offer”). See Section 8 for additional
information concerning Parent and Purchaser.
Tendering stockholders who are record owners of their Shares and
tender directly to the Depositary will not be obligated to pay
brokerage fees or commissions or, except as otherwise provided
in Instruction 6 of the Letter of Transmittal, stock
transfer taxes with respect to the purchase of Shares by
Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. If you own your shares through
a broker or other nominee, and your broker tenders your Shares
on your behalf, your broker or nominee may charge a fee for
doing so. You should consult your broker or nominee to determine
whether any charges or commissions will apply. Any tendering
stockholder or other payee that is a U.S. person or entity and
fails to complete and sign the Substitute
Form W-9,
which is included in the Letter of Transmittal, may be subject
to backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a rate
of 28% of the gross proceeds payable to such stockholder or
other payee pursuant to the Offer. See Section 5. Non-U.S.
persons should complete the appropriate Form W-8 and see
Instruction 9 of the Letter of Transmittal. Purchaser or
Parent will pay all charges and expenses of Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, which is acting as Dealer
Manager for the Offer (the “Dealer Manager”), Mellon
Investor Services LLC (the “Depositary”) and Innisfree
M&A Incorporated (the “Information Agent”)
incurred in connection with the Offer. See Section 16.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY (THE “BOARD”)
HAS UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING EACH OF THE OFFER
AND THE MERGER (EACH AS DEFINED HEREIN), ARE FAIR TO AND IN THE
BEST INTERESTS OF THE HOLDERS OF SHARES, HAS APPROVED AND
AUTHORIZED THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING EACH OF THE OFFER AND THE
MERGER, AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE HOLDERS OF SHARES ACCEPT THE
OFFER AND TENDER THEIR SHARES PURSUANT TO THE OFFER.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman Sachs”) has
delivered to the Board its written opinion dated
December 10, 2007, to the effect that, based upon and
subject to various considerations and assumptions set forth in
such opinion, the consideration proposed to be received by the
holders of Shares in the Offer and the Merger is fair from a
financial point of view to such holders. A copy of the written
opinion of Goldman Sachs is contained in the Company’s
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
(the
“Schedule 14D-9”),
which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Commission”) in connection with the Offer and
which is being mailed to the Company’s stockholders with
this Offer to Purchase. The Company’s stockholders are
urged to read such opinion carefully in its entirety for a
description of the assumptions made, matters considered and
limitations of the review undertaken by Goldman Sachs.
THE OFFER IS CONDITIONED UPON, AMONG OTHER THINGS,
(I) THERE HAVING BEEN VALIDLY TENDERED AND NOT WITHDRAWN
PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER AT LEAST THE NUMBER OF
SHARES THAT SHALL CONSTITUTE A MAJORITY OF THE SUM OF
(A) ALL SHARES OUTSTANDING AS OF THE SCHEDULED EXPIRATION
OF THE OFFER, AND (B) ALL SHARES ISSUABLE UPON THE
EXERCISE, CONVERSION OR EXCHANGE OF ALL COMPANY STOCK OPTIONS
AND OTHER RIGHTS TO ACQUIRE SHARES OUTSTANDING AS
OF THE SCHEDULED EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER, LESS (C) ANY
SHARES ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE OF ANY COMPANY STOCK OPTION
(X) NOT EXERCISABLE ON OR PRIOR TO MAY 15, 2008 OR
(Y) WITH AN EXERCISE PRICE GREATER THAN $10.50 PER SHARE
(THE MAJORITY OF SUCH SUM, THE “MINIMUM CONDITION”)
AND (II) ANY WAITING PERIODS UNDER THE
HART-SCOTT-RODINO
ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976, AS AMENDED, AND THE
ANTITRUST LAWS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, THE
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE
REPUBLIC OF KOREA HAVING EXPIRED OR BEEN TERMINATED PRIOR TO THE
EXPIRATION OF THE OFFER (THE “ANTITRUST CONDITION”).
THE OFFER IS ALSO SUBJECT TO CERTAIN OTHER CONDITIONS CONTAINED
IN THIS OFFER TO PURCHASE. SEE SECTIONS 1 AND 14, WHICH SET
FORTH IN FULL THE CONDITIONS TO THE OFFER.
The Offer is being made pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of December 10, 2007 (the “Merger
Agreement”), among Parent, Purchaser and the Company. The
Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that as promptly
as practicable after the purchase of Shares pursuant to the
Offer and the satisfaction or, if permissible, waiver of the
other conditions to the Merger set forth in the Merger Agreement
and in accordance with the relevant provisions of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“Delaware
Law”), Purchaser will be merged with and into the Company
(the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, the Company
will continue as the surviving corporation (the “Surviving
Corporation”) and will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent. At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective
Time”), each Share issued and outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time (other than Shares owned by Purchaser,
Parent or any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent or of the Company) will be canceled and converted
automatically into the right to receive $8.65 in cash, or any
higher price that may be paid per Share in the Offer, without
interest (the “Merger Consideration”), except for
Shares held by stockholders who demand and perfect appraisal
rights under Delaware Law. Stockholders who demand and fully
perfect appraisal rights under Delaware Law will be entitled to
receive, in connection with the Merger, cash for the fair value
of their Shares as determined pursuant to the procedures
prescribed by Delaware Law. See Section 11. The Merger
Agreement is more fully described in Section 10. Certain
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the sale of Shares
pursuant to the Offer and the Merger, as the case may be, are
described in Section 5.
The Merger Agreement provides that, promptly upon the purchase
by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer of such number of Shares
satisfying the Minimum Condition and from time to time
thereafter, Purchaser shall be entitled to designate up to such
number of directors, rounded up to the next whole number (but in
no event more than one less than the total number of directors
on the Board), on the Board as will give Purchaser
representation on the Board equal to the product of the total
number of directors on the Board (giving effect to the directors
elected pursuant to this section) multiplied by the percentage
that the aggregate number of Shares then owned by Purchaser or
any affiliate of Purchaser following such purchase bears to the
total number of Shares then outstanding. In the Merger
Agreement, subject to compliance with Section 14(f) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”) and
Rule 14f-1
promulgated thereunder, the Company has agreed, at such time, to
promptly take all actions reasonably necessary to, upon
Purchaser’s request, cause Purchaser’s designees to be
elected or appointed as directors of the Company, including
increasing the size of the Board or seeking and accepting the
resignations of incumbent directors, or both.
The consummation of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of certain conditions, including the consummation of the
Offer, and, if necessary, the adoption of the Merger Agreement
and the Merger by the affirmative vote of the stockholders of
the Company. For a more detailed description of the conditions
to the Merger, see Section 10. Under the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware Law, the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares is
required to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger.
Consequently, if Purchaser acquires (pursuant to the Offer or
otherwise) at least a majority of the outstanding Shares, then
Purchaser will have sufficient voting power to adopt the Merger
Agreement and approve the Merger without the vote of any other
stockholder. See Sections 10 and 11.
The Company has granted to Parent and Purchaser an irrevocable
option (the “Merger Option”) under the Merger
Agreement to purchase, following the consummation of the Offer
and subject to certain conditions and limitations, newly issued
Shares equal to the number of Shares that, when added to the
number of Shares owned by
2
Parent and Purchaser immediately following the consummation of
the Offer, shall equal one share more than 90% of the shares of
the Company’s common stock then outstanding on a diluted
basis (as calculated in accordance with the Merger Agreement).
The Merger Option will be exercisable only after the purchase of
and payment for Shares pursuant to the Offer as a result of
which Parent and Purchaser beneficially own at least 71% of the
then outstanding Shares on a diluted basis (as calculated in
accordance with the Merger Agreement).
Under Delaware Law, if Purchaser acquires, pursuant to the
Offer, the Merger Option, or otherwise, at least 90% of the then
outstanding Shares, Purchaser will be able to adopt the Merger
Agreement and approve the Merger without a vote of the
Company’s stockholders. In such event, Parent, Purchaser
and the Company have agreed to take all necessary and
appropriate action to cause the Merger to become effective in
accordance with Delaware Law as promptly as reasonably
practicable after such acquisition, without a meeting of the
Company’s stockholders. If, however, Purchaser does not
acquire at least 90% of the then outstanding Shares pursuant to
the Offer, the Merger Option, or otherwise, and a vote of the
Company’s stockholders is required under Delaware Law, a
significantly longer period of time will be required to effect
the Merger. See Section 11.
The Company has informed Purchaser that, as of December 14,
2007, 38,016,523 Shares were issued and outstanding,
5,799,848 Shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to
outstanding employee stock options and 841,398 Shares were
subject to forfeiture and a right of repurchase.
Purchaser may provide for a subsequent offering period in
connection with the Offer. If Purchaser elects to provide a
subsequent offering period, it will make a public announcement
thereof on the next business day after the previously scheduled
Expiration Date. See Section 1.
No appraisal rights are available in connection with the Offer;
however, stockholders may have appraisal rights in connection
with the Merger regardless of whether the Merger is consummated
with or without a vote of the Company’s stockholders. See
Section 11.
THIS OFFER TO PURCHASE AND THE RELATED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION WHICH SHOULD BE READ BEFORE ANY
DECISION IS MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE OFFER.
|
|
|
1.
|
Terms
of the Offer; Expiration Date.
|
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer
(including, if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and
conditions of such extension or amendment), Purchaser will
accept for payment and pay for all Shares validly tendered (and
not withdrawn in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Section 4) on or prior to the Expiration Date.
“Expiration Date” means 12:00 midnight, New York City
time, on January 16, 2008, unless and until Purchaser
(subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement)
shall have extended the period during which the Offer is open,
in which case Expiration Date shall mean the latest time and
date at which the Offer, as it may be extended by Purchaser,
shall expire.
The Offer is subject to the conditions set forth under
Section 14, including the satisfaction of the Minimum
Condition and the Antitrust Condition. Subject to the applicable
rules and regulations of the Commission and subject to the terms
and conditions of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser expressly
reserves the right to waive any such condition in whole or in
part, in its sole discretion. Subject to the applicable rules
and regulations of the Commission and subject to the terms and
conditions of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser also expressly
reserves the right to increase the price per Share payable in
the Offer and to make any other changes in the terms and
conditions of the Offer. However, unless previously approved by
the Company in writing, no change may be made that
(i) amends or waives the Minimum Condition,
(ii) decreases the price per share payable in the Offer,
(iii) changes the form of consideration to be paid in the
Offer, (iv) reduces the maximum number of Shares to be
purchased in the Offer, (v) imposes conditions to the Offer
in addition to those set forth in Section 14 hereto,
(vi) amends the conditions to the Offer set forth in
Section 14 hereto so as to broaden the scope of such
conditions to the Offer, (vii) extends, except as provided
for below, the Offer or (viii) makes any other changes to
any of the terms and conditions of the Offer that is adverse to
the holders of the Shares.
The Merger Agreement provides that Purchaser is obligated to
extend the Offer, until such time as either (A) all of the
conditions to the Offer have been satisfied or waived or
(B) the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to
3
the provisions therein, for one or more periods of not more than
ten business days each beyond the Expiration Date, as extended
by Purchaser, if, at the scheduled expiration of the Offer, any
of the conditions to the Offer set forth in Section 14
hereto, shall not be satisfied or waived. The Merger Agreement
also obligates Purchaser to extend the Offer for any period
required by any rule, regulation, position or interpretation of
the Commission, or the staff thereof, or of the Nasdaq Global
Market (“Nasdaq”), applicable to the Offer. During any
such extension, all Shares previously tendered and not withdrawn
will remain subject to the Offer, subject to the right of a
tendering stockholder to withdraw such stockholder’s
Shares. See Section 4. Under no circumstances will interest
be paid on the purchase price for tendered Shares, whether or
not the Offer is extended. Any extension of the Offer may be
effected by Purchaser giving oral or written notice of such
extension to the Depositary.
Purchaser shall, and Parent shall cause Purchaser to, pay for
all Shares validly tendered and not withdrawn as promptly as
practicable following the acceptance of Shares for payment
pursuant to the Offer. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding
sentence and subject to the applicable rules of the Commission
and the terms and conditions of the Offer, Purchaser also
expressly reserves the right to delay payment for Shares solely
in order to comply in whole or in part with applicable laws (any
such delay shall be effected in compliance with
Rule 14e-1(c)
under the Exchange Act, which requires Purchaser to pay the
consideration offered or to return Shares deposited by or on
behalf of stockholders promptly after the termination or
withdrawal of the Offer).
Any such delay will be followed as promptly as practicable by
public announcement thereof, such announcement in the case of an
extension to be made no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City
time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled
Expiration Date. Subject to applicable law (including
Rules 14d-4(d)(i),
14d-6(c) and
14e-1 under
the Exchange Act, which require that material changes be
promptly disseminated to stockholders in a manner reasonably
designed to inform them of such changes) and without limiting
the manner in which Purchaser may choose to make any public
announcement, Purchaser will have no obligation to publish,
advertise or otherwise communicate any such public announcement
other than by issuing a press release to the Dow Jones News
Service or the Public Relations Newswire.
If Purchaser makes a material change in the terms of the Offer
or the information concerning the Offer, or if it waives a
material condition of the Offer, Purchaser will extend the Offer
to the extent required by
Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act. Subject to the terms of the Merger
Agreement, if, prior to the Expiration Date, Purchaser should
decide to decrease the number of Shares being sought or to
increase or decrease the consideration being offered in the
Offer, such decrease in the number of Shares being sought or
such increase or decrease in the consideration being offered
will be applicable to all stockholders whose Shares are accepted
for payment pursuant to the Offer and, if at the time notice of
any such decrease in the number of Shares being sought or such
increase or decrease in the consideration being offered is first
published, sent or given to holders of such Shares, the Offer is
scheduled to expire at any time earlier than the period ending
on the tenth business day from and including the date that such
notice is first so published, sent or given, the Offer will be
extended at least until the expiration of such ten business day
period.
Purchaser may provide for a subsequent offering period in
connection with the Offer. If Purchaser does provide for such
subsequent offering period, subject to the applicable rules and
regulations of the Commission, Purchaser may elect to extend its
offer to purchase Shares beyond the Scheduled Expiration Date
for a subsequent offering period of not less than three business
days nor more than 20 business days (the “Subsequent
Offering Period”) to meet the objective that there be
validly tendered, in accordance with the terms of the Offer,
prior to the expiration of the Offer (as so extended), and not
withdrawn a number of Shares which, together with Shares then
owned by Parent and Purchaser, represents at least 90% of the
then outstanding Shares on a diluted basis (calculated in
accordance with the Merger Agreement) if, among other things,
upon the Expiration Date (i) all of the conditions to
Purchaser’s obligations to accept for payment, and to pay
for, the Shares are satisfied or waived and (ii) Purchaser
immediately accepts for payment, and promptly pays for, all
Shares validly tendered (and not withdrawn in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Section 4) prior to the
Expiration Date. Shares tendered during the Subsequent
Offering Period may not be withdrawn. See Section 4.
Purchaser will immediately accept for payment, and promptly pay
for, all validly tendered Shares as they are received during the
Subsequent Offering Period. Any election by Purchaser to include
a Subsequent Offering Period may be effected by Purchaser giving
oral or written notice of the Subsequent Offering Period to the
Depositary. If Purchaser decides to include a Subsequent
Offering Period, it will make a public announcement to that
effect on the next business day after the previously scheduled
Expiration Date.
4
For purposes of the Offer, a “business day” means any
day other than Saturday, Sunday or a United States federal
holiday.
The Company has provided Purchaser with the Company’s
stockholder list and security position listings for the purpose
of disseminating the Offer to holders of Shares. This Offer to
Purchase and the related Letter of Transmittal will be mailed by
Purchaser to record holders of Shares whose names appear on the
Company’s stockholder list and will be furnished, for
subsequent transmittal to beneficial owners of Shares, to
brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and similar
persons whose names, or the names of whose nominees, appear on
the stockholder list or, if applicable, who are listed as
participants in a clearing agency’s security position
listing.
|
|
|
2.
|
Acceptance
for Payment and Payment for Shares.
|
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer
(including, if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and
conditions of any such extension or amendment), Purchaser will
accept for payment promptly after the Expiration Date all Shares
validly tendered (and not properly withdrawn in accordance with
Section 4) prior to the Expiration Date. Purchaser
shall, and Parent shall cause Purchaser to, pay for all Shares
validly tendered and not withdrawn as promptly as practicable
following the acceptance of Shares for payment pursuant to the
Offer. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence and
subject to applicable rules and regulations of the Commission
and the terms of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser expressly
reserves the right to delay payment for Shares solely in order
to comply in whole or in part with applicable laws. See
Sections 1 and 15. If Purchaser decides to include a
Subsequent Offering Period, Purchaser will accept for payment,
and promptly pay for, all validly tendered Shares as they are
received during the Subsequent Offering Period. See
Section 1.
In all cases (including during any Subsequent Offering Period),
Purchaser will pay for Shares tendered and accepted for payment
pursuant to the Offer only after timely receipt by the
Depositary of (i) the certificates evidencing such Shares
(the “Share Certificates”) or timely confirmation (a
“Book-Entry Confirmation”) of a book-entry transfer of
such Shares into the Depositary’s account at The Depository
Trust Company (the “Book-Entry Transfer
Facility”) pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Section 3, (ii) the Letter of Transmittal (or a
manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly
executed, with any required signature guarantees, or in the case
of a book-entry transfer, an Agent’s Message (as defined
below) and (iii) any other documents required under the
Letter of Transmittal. The term “Agent’s Message”
means a message, transmitted by the Book-Entry Transfer Facility
to, and received by, the Depositary and forming a part of the
Book-Entry Confirmation which states that the Book-Entry
Transfer Facility has received an express acknowledgment from
the participant in the Book-Entry Transfer Facility tendering
the Shares that are the subject of such Book-Entry Confirmation,
that such participant has received and agrees to be bound by the
Letter of Transmittal and that Purchaser may enforce such
agreement against such participant.
For purposes of the Offer (including during any Subsequent
Offering Period), Purchaser will be deemed to have accepted for
payment (and thereby purchased) Shares validly tendered and not
properly withdrawn as, if and when Purchaser gives oral or
written notice to the Depositary of Purchaser’s acceptance
for payment of such Shares pursuant to the Offer. Upon the terms
and subject to the conditions of the Offer, payment for Shares
accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer will be made by
deposit of the purchase price therefor with the Depositary,
which will act as agent for tendering stockholders for the
purpose of receiving payments from Purchaser and transmitting
such payments to tendering stockholders whose Shares have been
accepted for payment. Under no circumstances will Purchaser
pay interest on the purchase price for Shares, regardless of any
delay in making such payment.
If any tendered Shares are not accepted for payment for any
reason pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Offer, or if
Share Certificates are submitted evidencing more Shares than are
tendered, Share Certificates evidencing unpurchased Shares will
be returned, without expense to the tendering stockholder (or,
in the case of Shares tendered by book-entry transfer into the
Depositary’s account at a Book-Entry Transfer Facility
pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 3, such
Shares will be credited to an account maintained at such
Book-Entry Transfer Facility), promptly following the expiration
or termination of the Offer.
Purchaser reserves the right to transfer or assign, in whole or
from time to time in part, to one or more of its affiliates, the
right to purchase all or any portion of the Shares tendered
pursuant to the Offer, but any such transfer or assignment will
not relieve Purchaser of its obligations under the Offer and
will in no way prejudice the rights of
5
tendering stockholders to receive payment for Shares validly
tendered and accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer.
|
|
|
3.
|
Procedures
for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.
|
In order for a holder of Shares validly to tender Shares
pursuant to the Offer, the Depositary must receive the Letter of
Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof), properly
completed and duly executed, together with any required
signature guarantees or, in the case of a book-entry transfer,
an Agent’s Message, and any other documents required by the
Letter of Transmittal, at one of its addresses set forth on the
back cover of this Offer to Purchase and either (i) the
Share Certificates evidencing tendered Shares must be received
by the Depositary at such address or such Shares must be
tendered pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer
described below and a Book-Entry Confirmation must be received
by the Depositary (including an Agent’s Message), in each
case prior to the Expiration Date or the expiration of the
Subsequent Offering Period, if any, or (ii) the tendering
stockholder must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures
described below.
Tendering stockholders who have Shares registered in their names
and who tender directly to Mellon Investor Services LLC will not
be charged brokerage fees or commissions or, except as set forth
in the Letter of Transmittal, transfer taxes on the purchase of
Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. Stockholders who hold
their Shares through a broker or bank should consult with that
institution as to whether it charges any service fees.
THE METHOD OF DELIVERY OF SHARE CERTIFICATES AND ALL OTHER
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING DELIVERY THROUGH THE BOOK-ENTRY
TRANSFER FACILITY, IS AT THE OPTION AND RISK OF THE TENDERING
STOCKHOLDER, AND THE DELIVERY WILL BE DEEMED MADE ONLY WHEN
ACTUALLY RECEIVED BY THE DEPOSITARY. IF DELIVERY IS BY MAIL,
REGISTERED MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, PROPERLY INSURED,
IS RECOMMENDED. IN ALL CASES, SUFFICIENT TIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED
TO ENSURE TIMELY DELIVERY.
Book-Entry Transfer. The Depositary will
establish accounts with respect to the Shares at the Book-Entry
Transfer Facility for purposes of the Offer within two business
days after the date of this Offer to Purchase. Any financial
institution that is a participant in the system of the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility may make a book-entry delivery of
Shares by causing the Book-Entry Transfer Facility to transfer
such Shares into the Depositary’s account at the Book-Entry
Transfer Facility in accordance with the Book-Entry Transfer
Facility’s procedures for such transfer. However, although
delivery of Shares may be effected through book-entry transfer
at the Book-Entry Transfer Facility, an Agent’s Message and
any other required documents, must, in any case, be received by
the Depositary at one of its addresses set forth on the back
cover of this Offer to Purchase prior to the Expiration Date or
the expiration of the Subsequent Offering Period, if any, or the
tendering stockholder must comply with the guaranteed delivery
procedure described below. Delivery of documents to the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility does not constitute delivery to the
Depositary.
Signature Guarantees. Signatures on all
Letters of Transmittal must be guaranteed by a firm which is a
member of the Security Transfer Agent Medallion Signature
Program, or by any other “eligible guarantor
institution,” as such term is defined in
Rule 17Ad-15
under the Exchange Act (each of the foregoing being referred to
as an “Eligible Institution”), except in cases where
Shares are tendered (i) by a registered holder of Shares
who has not completed either the box entitled “Special
Payment Instructions” or the box entitled “Special
Delivery Instructions” on the Letter of Transmittal or
(ii) for the account of an Eligible Institution. If a Share
Certificate is registered in the name of a person other than the
signer of the Letter of Transmittal, or if payment is to be
made, or a Share Certificate not accepted for payment or not
tendered is to be returned, to a person other than the
registered holder(s), then the Share Certificate must be
endorsed or accompanied by appropriate stock powers, in either
case signed exactly as the name(s) of the registered holder(s)
appear on the Share Certificate, with the signature(s) on such
Share Certificate or stock powers guaranteed by an Eligible
Institution. See Instructions 1, 5 and 7 of the Letter of
Transmittal.
Guaranteed Delivery. If a stockholder desires
to tender Shares pursuant to the Offer and such
stockholder’s Share Certificates evidencing such Shares are
not immediately available or such stockholder cannot deliver the
Share Certificates and all other required documents to the
Depositary prior to the Expiration Date, or such
6
stockholder cannot complete the procedure for delivery by
book-entry transfer on a timely basis, such Shares may
nevertheless be tendered, provided that all the following
conditions are satisfied:
(i) such tender is made by or through an Eligible
Institution;
(ii) a properly completed and duly executed Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery, substantially in the form made available by
Purchaser, is received prior to the Expiration Date by the
Depositary as provided below; and
(iii) the Share Certificates (or a Book-Entry Confirmation)
evidencing all tendered Shares, in proper form for transfer, in
each case together with the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually
signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed,
with any required signature guarantees or, in the case of a
book-entry transfer, an Agent’s Message, and any other
documents required by the Letter of Transmittal are received by
the Depositary within three Nasdaq Global Market
(“Nasdaq”) trading days after the date of execution of
such Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
The Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be delivered by hand or
mail or by facsimile transmission to the Depositary and must
include a guarantee by an Eligible Institution in the form set
forth in the form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery made
available by Purchaser. The procedures for guaranteed delivery
above may not be used during any Subsequent Offering Period.
In all cases (including during any Subsequent Offering Period),
payment for Shares tendered and accepted for payment pursuant to
the Offer will be made only after timely receipt by the
Depositary of the Share Certificates evidencing such Shares, or
a Book-Entry Confirmation of the delivery of such Shares, and
the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile
thereof), properly completed and duly executed, with any
required signature guarantees or, in the case of a book-entry
transfer, an Agent’s Message, and any other documents
required by the Letter of Transmittal.
Determination of Validity. All questions as
to the form of documents and the validity, form, eligibility
(including time of receipt) and acceptance for payment of any
tender of Shares will be determined by Purchaser, in its sole
discretion, which determination shall be final and binding on
all parties. Purchaser reserves the absolute right to reject
any and all tenders determined by it not to be in proper form or
the acceptance for payment of which may, in the opinion of its
counsel, be unlawful. Purchaser also reserves the absolute right
to waive any condition of the Offer to the extent permitted by
applicable law and the Merger Agreement or any defect or
irregularity in the tender of any Shares of any particular
stockholder, whether or not similar defects or irregularities
are waived in the case of other stockholders. No tender of
Shares will be deemed to have been validly made until all
defects and irregularities have been cured or waived. None of
Purchaser, Parent or any of their respective affiliates or
assigns, the Dealer Manager, the Depositary, the Information
Agent or any other person will be under any duty to give
notification of any defects or irregularities in tenders or
incur any liability for failure to give any such notification.
Purchaser’s interpretation of the terms and conditions
of the Offer (including the Letter of Transmittal and the
instructions thereto) will be final and binding.
A tender of Shares pursuant to any of the procedures described
above will constitute the tendering stockholder’s
acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Offer, as well as
the tendering stockholder’s representation and warranty to
Purchaser that (i) such stockholder has the full power and
authority to tender, sell, assign and transfer the tendered
Shares (and any and all other Shares or other securities issued
or issuable in respect of such Shares), and (ii) when the
same are accepted for payment by Purchaser, Purchaser will
acquire good and unencumbered title thereto, free and clear of
all liens, restrictions, charges and encumbrances and not
subject to any adverse claims.
The acceptance for payment by Purchaser of Shares pursuant to
any of the procedures described above will constitute a binding
agreement between the tendering stockholder and Purchaser upon
the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer.
Appointment as Proxy. By executing the Letter
of Transmittal, or through delivery of an Agent’s Message,
as set forth above, a tendering stockholder irrevocably appoints
Reza Kazerounian and Archibald Malone such stockholder’s
agents, attorneys-in-fact and proxies, each with full power of
substitution, in the manner set forth in the Letter of
Transmittal, to the full extent of such stockholder’s
rights with respect to the Shares tendered by such
7
stockholder and accepted for payment by Purchaser (and with
respect to any and all other Shares or other securities issued
or issuable in respect of such Shares on or after
December 10, 2007). All such powers of attorney and proxies
shall be considered irrevocable and coupled with an interest in
the tendered Shares. Such appointment will be effective when,
and only to the extent that, Purchaser accepts such Shares for
payment. Upon such acceptance for payment, all prior powers of
attorney and proxies given by such stockholder with respect to
such Shares (and such other Shares and securities) will be
revoked, without further action, and no subsequent powers of
attorney or proxies may be given nor any subsequent written
consent executed by such stockholder (and, if given or executed,
will not be deemed to be effective) with respect thereto. The
designees of Purchaser will, with respect to the Shares for
which the appointment is effective, be empowered to exercise all
voting and other rights of such stockholder as they in their
sole discretion may deem proper at any annual or special meeting
of the Company’s stockholders or any adjournment or
postponement thereof, by written consent in lieu of any such
meeting or otherwise. Purchaser reserves the right to require
that, in order for Shares to be deemed validly tendered,
immediately upon Purchaser’s payment for such Shares,
Purchaser must be able to exercise full voting rights with
respect to such Shares (and such other Shares and securities).
Under the backup withholding provisions of U.S. federal
income tax law, the Depositary may be required to withhold 28%
of any payments of cash pursuant to the Offer. To prevent backup
withholding of U.S. federal income tax with respect to
payment to certain stockholders of the purchase price of Shares
purchased pursuant to the Offer, each such stockholder that is a
U.S. person or entity must provide the Depositary with such
stockholder’s correct taxpayer identification number and
certify that such stockholder is not subject to backup
withholding of U.S. federal income tax by completing the
Substitute
Form W-9
in the Letter of Transmittal. See Instruction 9 of the
Letter of Transmittal.
Tenders of Shares made pursuant to the Offer are irrevocable
except that such Shares may be withdrawn at any time prior to
the Expiration Date and, unless theretofore accepted for payment
by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer, may also be withdrawn at any
time after February 16, 2008. If Purchaser extends the
Offer, is delayed in its acceptance for payment of Shares or is
unable to accept Shares for payment pursuant to the Offer for
any reason, then, without prejudice to Purchaser’s rights
under the Offer, the Depositary may, nevertheless, on behalf of
Purchaser, retain tendered Shares, and such Shares may not be
withdrawn except to the extent that tendering stockholders are
entitled to withdrawal rights as described in this
Section 4, subject to
Rule 14e-1(c)
under the Exchange Act. Any such delay will be by an extension
of the Offer to the extent required by law. If Purchaser decides
to include a Subsequent Offering Period, Shares tendered during
the Subsequent Offering Period may not be withdrawn. See
Section 1.
For a withdrawal to be effective, a written or facsimile
transmission notice of withdrawal must be timely received by the
Depositary at one of its addresses set forth on the back cover
page of this Offer to Purchase. Any such notice of withdrawal
must specify the name of the person who tendered the Shares to
be withdrawn, the number of Shares to be withdrawn and the name
of the registered holder of such Shares, if different from that
of the person who tendered such Shares. If Share Certificates
evidencing Shares to be withdrawn have been delivered or
otherwise identified to the Depositary, then, prior to the
physical release of such Share Certificates, the serial numbers
shown on such Share Certificates must be submitted to the
Depositary and the signature(s) on the notice of withdrawal must
be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution, unless such Shares
have been tendered for the account of an Eligible Institution.
If Shares have been tendered pursuant to the procedure for
book-entry transfer as set forth in Section 3, any notice
of withdrawal must specify the name and number of the account at
the Book-Entry Transfer Facility to be credited with the
withdrawn Shares.
All questions as to the form and validity (including time of
receipt) of any notice of withdrawal will be determined by
Purchaser, in its sole discretion, whose determination will be
final and binding. None of Purchaser, Parent or any of their
respective affiliates or assigns, the Dealer Manager, the
Depositary, the Information Agent or any other person will be
under any duty to give any notification of any defects or
irregularities in any notice of withdrawal or incur any
liability for failure to give any such notification.
8
Withdrawals of tenders of Shares may not be rescinded. Any
Shares properly withdrawn will thereafter be deemed not to have
been validly tendered for purposes of the Offer. However,
withdrawn Shares may be re-tendered in the Offer at any time
prior to the Expiration Date (or during the Subsequent Offering
Period, if any) by following one of the procedures described in
Section 3 (except Shares may not be re-tendered using the
procedures for guaranteed delivery during any Subsequent
Offering Period).
|
|
|
5.
|
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.
|
The following is a general discussion of the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Offer and the
Merger to holders whose Shares are purchased pursuant to the
Offer or whose Shares are converted into the right to receive
cash in the Merger (whether upon receipt of the Merger
Consideration or pursuant to the proper exercise of
dissenter’s rights). This discussion is based on the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the related Treasury
regulations, and administrative interpretations and court
decisions, all of which are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the accuracy of
the statements and the conclusions discussed below and the tax
consequences of the Offer and the Merger. This discussion
applies only to holders that hold their Shares as capital
assets. This discussion does not address all U.S. federal
income tax consequences that may be relevant to particular
holders, including holders that are subject to special tax
rules, such as dealers in securities; financial institutions;
insurance companies; tax-exempt organizations; holders that hold
their Shares as part of a position in a “straddle” or
as part of a “hedging” or “conversion”
transaction; holders that have a “functional currency”
other than the U.S. dollar; holders that own their Shares
indirectly through partnerships, trusts or other entities that
may be subject to special treatment; holders that acquired their
Shares pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or
otherwise as compensation, or to holders of Shares who are not
U.S. persons. For purposes of this discussion, U.S. persons
are (i) U.S. citizens or residents of the United States of
America, as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
(ii) corporations, or other entities taxable as corporations,
created or organized under the laws of the United States or any
political subdivision thereof, (iii) estates whose income is
subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source and
(iv) trusts (a) if a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision
over the trusts’ administration and one or more U.S.
persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of
the trusts or (b) that have valid elections in effect under
applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as U.S. persons.
THE TAX DISCUSSION SET FORTH BELOW IS INCLUDED FOR GENERAL
INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS BASED UPON PRESENT LAW (WHICH
MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, POSSIBLY ON A RETROACTIVE BASIS).
BECAUSE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES MAY DIFFER, EACH HOLDER OF
SHARES SHOULD CONSULT SUCH HOLDER’S OWN TAX ADVISOR TO
DETERMINE THE APPLICABILITY OF THE RULES DISCUSSED TO SUCH
HOLDER AND THE PARTICULAR TAX EFFECTS OF THE OFFER AND THE
MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF STATE, LOCAL AND
OTHER TAX LAWS.
The receipt of the offer price and the receipt of cash pursuant
to the Merger (whether as Merger Consideration or pursuant to
the proper exercise of dissenter’s rights) will be a
taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder
of Shares will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference
between such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Shares sold
pursuant to the Offer or converted to cash in the Merger and the
amount of cash received therefor. Gain or loss must be
determined separately for each block of Shares (i.e., Shares
acquired at the same cost in a single transaction) sold pursuant
to the Offer or converted to cash in the Merger. Such gain or
loss will be capital gain or loss. Non-corporate holders will be
subject to tax on the net amount of such gain at a maximum rate
of 15% provided that the Shares were held for more than one
year. The deduction of capital losses is subject to certain
limitations. Holders should consult their own tax advisors in
this regard.
Payments in connection with the Offer or the Merger may be
subject to backup withholding at a 28% rate. Backup withholding
generally applies if a holder (i) fails to furnish such
holder’s social security number or taxpayer identification
number (“TIN”), (ii) furnishes an incorrect TIN,
(iii) fails properly to report interest or dividends and is
notified by the Internal Revenue Service that the payee is
subject to backup withholding or (iv) under certain
circumstances, fails to provide a certified statement, signed
under penalties of perjury, that the TIN provided is such
holder’s correct number and that such holder is not subject
to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional
tax. Rather, the U.S. federal income tax liability of
persons subject to backup withholding will be reduced
9
by the amount of tax withheld. If withholding results in an
overpayment of taxes, a refund may be obtained provided that the
required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service in a timely manner. Certain persons, including
corporations and financial institutions generally, are exempt
from backup withholding. Certain penalties apply for failure to
furnish correct information and for failure to include the
reportable payments in income. Each holder should consult with
such holder’s own tax advisor as to such holder’s
qualifications for exemption from withholding and the procedure
for obtaining such exemption.
|
|
|
6.
|
Price
Range of Shares; Dividends.
|
The Shares are listed and principally traded on the Nasdaq under
the symbol “GNSS”. The following table sets forth, for
the quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices per Share
on Nasdaq as reported by the Dow Jones News Service.
Shares
Market Data
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
|
$
|
11.96
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
19.55
|
|
|
|
13.23
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
27.69
|
|
|
|
17.72
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
23.60
|
|
|
|
16.85
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.45
|
|
|
$
|
16.45
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
17.67
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
14.95
|
|
|
|
9.75
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
12.25
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.53
|
|
|
$
|
7.65
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.16
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through December 17, 2007)
|
|
$
|
8.73
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
On December 10, 2007, the last full trading day prior to
the announcement of the execution of the Merger Agreement and of
Purchaser’s intention to commence the Offer, the closing
price per Share as reported on Nasdaq was $5.40. On
December 17, 2007, the last full trading day prior to the
commencement of the Offer, the closing price per Share as
reported on Nasdaq was $8.48. As of December 14, 2007, the
approximate number of holders of record of the Shares was 160.
The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its
Shares.
Stockholders are urged to obtain a current market quotation
for the Shares.
|
|
|
7.
|
Certain
Information Concerning the Company.
|
Except as otherwise set forth in this Offer to Purchase, all of
the information concerning the Company contained in this Offer
to Purchase, including financial information, has been furnished
by the Company or has been taken from or based upon publicly
available documents and records on file with the Commission and
other public sources. Parent and Purchaser have relied on the
accuracy of such information furnished by the Company
and/or
included in the publicly available information on the Company
and have not made any independent attempt to verify the accuracy
of such information.
General. The Company is a Delaware corporation
with its principal executive offices located at
2525 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054,
Telephone Number:
(408) 919-8400.
The Company designs, develops and markets integrated circuits
called display controllers that receive and process analog and
digital video and graphic images for viewing on a flat-panel
display. The display controllers are typically located inside a
flat-panel display device, such as a flat-panel television or
computer monitor.
10
Certain Forecasts of the Company. Prior to
entering into the Merger Agreement, Parent conducted a due
diligence review of the Company and in connection with such
review received from the Company certain forecasts of the
Company’s future operating performance. Parent and
Purchaser have been advised by the Company that the Company does
not in the ordinary course publicly disclose forecasts and that
the forecasts provided to Parent and Purchaser by the Company
were prepared by the Company solely for the purpose of
negotiating with Parent the terms of the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer and
the Merger, and as basis for the financial analyses performed by
Goldman Sachs & Co., the Company’s financial
advisor, in connection with the preparation of its fairness
opinion, and were not prepared with a view to public disclosure.
The information set forth below is included in this Offer to
Purchase only because the Company provided non-public forecasts
of the Company’s future operating performance to Parent and
Purchaser. The Company has advised Parent and Purchaser that its
forecasts were prepared by the Company’s management based
on numerous assumptions including, among others, projections of
revenues, operating income, operating expenses, manufacturing
costs, pricing and sales volumes of existing and future products
and customer orders arising from new product introductions. No
assurances can be given with respect to any such assumptions.
The information set forth below does not give effect to the
Offer or the potential combined operations of Parent and the
Company or any alterations Parent may make to the Company’s
operations or strategy after the consummation of the Offer. The
information set forth below is presented for the sole purpose of
giving holders of Shares access to the material financial
forecasts prepared by the Company’s management that were
made available to Parent and Purchaser in connection with the
Merger Agreement and the Offer, and Goldman Sachs in connection
with the preparation of its fairness opinion.
Forecasted
Financial Information of the Company
FORECASTED
INCOME STATEMENT*
Genesis Microchip Inc. Management Forecasts (in millions, except
for EPS)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
197.8
|
|
|
$
|
231.8
|
|
|
$
|
334.5
|
|
|
Gross Profit(1)
|
|
$
|
69.7
|
|
|
$
|
88.3
|
|
|
$
|
135.3
|
|
|
Operating Profit(2)
|
|
$
|
(34.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
|
Net Income(2)
|
|
$
|
(38.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
Earnings per Share(2)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These statements are subject to the qualifications and
limitations set forth above and below under the heading
“Certain Forecasts of the Company” |
| |
|
(1) |
|
Does not include amortization of intangibles from operations or
stock based compensation from operations. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include amortization of intangibles from operations and
from research and development, stock based compensation and
impairment of goodwill. |
Certain matters discussed herein, including, but not limited to
these forecasts, are forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the
information set forth above under “Forecasted Financial
Information of the Company”. While presented with numerical
specificity, these forecasts were not prepared by the Company in
the ordinary course and are based upon a variety of estimates
and hypothetical assumptions which may not be accurate, may not
be realized, and are also inherently subject to significant
business, economic and competitive uncertainties and
contingencies, all of which are difficult to predict, and most
of which are beyond the control of the Company. In particular,
the Company operates in an intensely competitive industry
characterized by technological change, changes in customer
requirements, frequent new product introductions and
improvements, evolving industry standards and rapidly declining
average selling prices. In order to compete in the digital
television market, consumer electronics manufacturers must first
select the Company’s products for incorporation into their
digital televisions, giving the Company so-called “design
wins.” According to the Company, design wins for the
Company’s digital television products typically occur in
the first calendar quarter of each year with associated product
sales occurring only after the design win when the Company
actually ships its products. To the
11
extent the Company does not achieve design wins in calendar year
2009 for its products currently in development, the Company may
be unable to meet its forecasts. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that any of the forecasts will be realized and the
actual results for the fiscal years ending March 31, 2008,
2009 and 2010 may vary materially from those shown above.
Holders of Shares are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
the information set forth above.
In addition, these forecasts were not prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and neither the
Company’s nor Parent’s independent accountants has
examined or compiled any of these forecasts or expressed any
conclusion or provided any other form of assurance with respect
to these forecasts and accordingly assume no responsibility for
these forecasts. These forecasts were prepared with a limited
degree of precision, and were not prepared with a view to public
disclosure or compliance with the published guidelines of the
Commission or the guidelines established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding forecasts,
which would require a more complete presentation of data than as
shown above. The inclusion of these forecasts in this Offer to
Purchase should not be regarded as an indication that any of
Parent, Purchaser or the Company or their respective affiliates
or representatives considered or consider the projections to be
a reliable prediction of future events and the projections
should not be relied on as such. Since the information above
covers multiple years, such information by its nature becomes
less reliable with each successive year. None of Parent,
Purchaser, or any other person to whom these projections were
provided assumes any responsibility for their accuracy or
validity. None of Parent, Purchaser, the Company, or any of
their financial advisors, affiliates or representatives has made
or makes any representation to any person regarding the ultimate
performance of the Company compared to the information contained
in the forecasts. None of Parent, Purchaser, the Company or any
of their respective financial advisors, affiliates, or
representatives, intends to update or otherwise revise the
forecasts to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the
event that any or all of the assumptions underlying the
forecasts are shown to be in error.
Available Information. The Company is subject
to the informational filing requirements of the Exchange Act
and, in accordance therewith, is required to file periodic
reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Commission relating to its business, financial condition and
other matters. Information as of particular dates concerning the
Company’s directors and officers, their remuneration, stock
options granted to them, the principal holders of the
Company’s securities and any material interest of such
persons in transactions with the Company is required to be
disclosed in proxy statements distributed to the Company’s
stockholders and filed with the Commission. Such reports, proxy
statements and other information should be available for
inspection at the public reference facilities maintained by the
Commission at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such materials may also
be obtained by mail, upon payment of the Commission’s
customary fees, by writing to its principal office at
100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The Commission also maintains a
World Wide Website on the Internet at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the Commission.
|
|
|
8.
|
Certain
Information Concerning Purchaser and Parent.
|
General. Purchaser is a newly incorporated
Delaware corporation organized in connection with the Offer and
the Merger and has not carried on any activities other than in
connection with the Offer and the Merger. The principal offices
of Purchaser are located at 39, Chemin du Champ-des-Filles, 1228
Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland, Telephone:
+41-22-929-2929. Purchaser is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent.
Until immediately prior to the time that Purchaser will purchase
Shares pursuant to the Offer, it is not anticipated that
Purchaser will have any significant assets or liabilities or
engage in activities other than those incidental to its
formation and capitalization and the transactions contemplated
by the Offer and the Merger. Because Purchaser is newly formed
and has minimal assets and capitalization, no meaningful
financial information regarding Purchaser is available.
Parent is a limited liability company organized under the Laws
of the Netherlands, with its corporate seat in Amsterdam, the
Netherlands. Its principal offices are located at 39, Chemin du
Champ-des-Filles, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland,
Telephone: +41-22-929-2929. Parent is a global independent
semiconductor company that designs, develops, manufactures and
markets a broad range of semiconductor products used in a wide
variety of microelectronic applications, including automotive
products, computer peripherals, telecommunications systems,
consumer products, industrial automation and control systems.
12
The name, citizenship, business address, business telephone
number, principal occupation or employment, and five-year
employment history for each of the directors and executive
officers of Purchaser and Parent and certain other information
are set forth in Schedule I hereto. Except as described in
this Offer to Purchase and in Schedule I hereto, none of
Parent, Purchaser or, to the best knowledge of such
corporations, any of the persons listed on Schedule I to
the Offer of Purchase has during the last five years
(i) been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding
traffic violations or similar misdemeanors) or (ii) been a
party to any judicial or administrative proceeding (except for
matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that
resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the
person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities
subject to, federal or state securities laws or finding any
violation of such laws.
Except as described in this Offer to Purchase, (i) none of
Purchaser, Parent nor, to the best knowledge of Purchaser and
Parent, any of the persons listed in Schedule I to this
Offer to Purchase or any associate or majority owned subsidiary
of Purchaser, Parent or any of the persons so listed,
beneficially owns or has any right to acquire any Shares and
(ii) none of Purchaser, Parent nor, to the best knowledge
of Purchaser and Parent, any of the persons or entities referred
to above nor any director, executive officer or subsidiary of
any of the foregoing has effected any transaction in the Shares
during the past 60 days.
Except as provided in the Merger Agreement and as otherwise
described in this Offer to Purchase, none of Purchaser, Parent
nor, to the best knowledge of Purchaser and Parent, any of the
persons listed in Schedule I to this Offer to Purchase, has
any agreement, arrangement, understanding, whether or not
legally enforceable, with any other person with respect to any
securities of the Company, including, but not limited to, the
transfer or voting of such securities, joint ventures, loan or
option arrangements, puts or calls, guaranties of loans,
guaranties against loss or the giving or withholding of proxies,
consents or authorizations. Except as set forth in this Offer to
Purchase, since April 1, 2005, neither Purchaser nor Parent
nor, to the best knowledge of Purchaser and Parent, any of the
persons listed on Schedule I hereto, has had any
transaction with the Company or any of its executive officers,
directors or affiliates that is required to be reported under
the rules and regulations of the Commission applicable to the
Offer. Except as set forth in this Offer to Purchase, since
April 1, 2005, there have been no negotiations,
transactions or material contacts between any of Purchaser,
Parent, or any of their respective subsidiaries or, to the best
knowledge of Purchaser and Parent, any of the persons listed in
Schedule I to this Offer to Purchase, on the one hand, and
the Company or its affiliates, on the other hand, concerning a
merger, consolidation or acquisition, tender offer for or other
acquisition of any class of the Company’s securities, an
election of the Company’s directors or a sale or other
transfer of a material amount of assets of the Company.
|
|
|
9.
|
Financing
of the Offer and the Merger.
|
The total amount of funds required by Purchaser to consummate
the Offer and the Merger and to pay related fees and expenses is
estimated to be approximately $348.5 million. Purchaser
will obtain all of such funds from Parent or one of
Parent’s subsidiaries. Parent and its subsidiary will
provide such funds from existing resources.
|
|
|
10.
|
Background
of the Offer; Contacts with the Company; the Merger
Agreement.
|
Background
of the Offer
The Strategic Committee of Parent’s Supervisory Board and
senior management of Parent regularly review opportunities to
achieve Parent’s strategic goals through acquisitions or
other strategic transactions. In connection with such efforts,
in the first half of 2007, the management of the consumer
products group of Parent conducted a review of potential
strategic opportunities in the consumer products semiconductor
market, with a focus on the display image technology market.
During the course of this review, Parent evaluated several
potential acquisition targets. At the end of June 2007, Parent
had not yet determined whether to pursue a potential transaction
with any of the potential acquisition candidates.
On June 28, 2007, a representative of Goldman Sachs
contacted Loic Lietar, Group Vice President, Deputy General
Manager, Strategy, Strategy and System Technology, of Parent to
discuss a potential collaboration between the Company and
Parent. During that conversation, Mr. Lietar, on behalf of
Parent, expressed an interest in collaborating with the Company
and, as a result, agreed that representatives of Parent should
meet with representatives of the Company.
13
On July 12, 2007, Guy Lauvergeon, Group Vice President,
Corporate Strategy & Technology of Parent, spoke by
telephone with Hildy Shandell, Senior Vice President, Corporate
Development of the Company, and arranged a meeting at the
Company’s headquarters in Santa Clara, California on
July 25, 2007.
On July 25, 2007, Mr. Lauvergeon met with Elias
Antoun, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
Behrooz Yadegar, Senior Vice President, Product Development of
the Company, and Ms. Shandell at the Company’s
headquarters to explore potential collaboration between the two
companies. During this meeting, the parties exchanged
information about their respective businesses and the potential
strategic fit of the two companies. At this meeting,
Mr. Lauvergeon inquired as to whether the Company was
committed to continuing as a stand-alone company.
Mr. Antoun indicated that the Company was open to exploring
various alternatives with Parent, including a potential
acquisition of the Company by Parent.
Following the meeting in Santa Clara on July 25, 2007,
the management of Parent’s consumer products group
evaluated the possibility of acquiring the Company in light of
the Company’s willingness to consider such a transaction.
After a review of information about the Company and a discussion
of the strategic advantages of an acquisition of the Company,
Parent’s senior management authorized the management of
Parent’s consumer products group to continue discussions
with the Company.
On August 29, 2007, the Company entered into a
confidentiality agreement with Parent. On the same day,
Messrs. Antoun and Yadegar and Ms. Shandell met with
members of the management of Parent, including Philippe
Lambinet, Corporate Vice President, General Manager, Home
Entertainment and Displays Group, and Laurent Remont, Chief
System Architect, in Paris, France, to determine whether there
was enough interest to commence discussions regarding potential
business and strategic opportunities between the two companies.
The principal topic discussed at this meeting was a general
overview of the Company’s business and technology.
On September 13, 2007, following internal discussions at
Parent regarding the desirability of proceeding with a potential
acquisition of the Company, Mr. Lambinet confirmed to
Mr. Antoun Parent’s interest in pursuing further
discussions with the Company. At that time, Mr. Lambinet
provided a list of diligence questions with respect to the
Company’s business and operations.
On September 17, 2007, Mr. Antoun provided responses
to the diligence questions provided by Parent, but indicated to
Parent that the Company was not prepared to provide additional
information to Parent until Parent provided the Company with an
indication of serious interest.
Following Mr. Antoun’s response to Parent,
Parent’s senior management continued to evaluate whether or
not to submit a non-binding proposal to the Company in light of
other strategic opportunities potentially available to Parent.
On October 12, 2007, representatives of Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated (“Morgan
Stanley”) participated in a conference call with members of
Parent’s management and presented a preliminary review of
the Company, its business and its historical results of
operations.
On October 15, 2007, Messrs. Antoun, Lambinet and
Lauvergeon met in Geneva, Switzerland and discussed the
businesses of the Company and Parent and whether the parties
should engage in any further discussions regarding a potential
transaction.
Following the meeting in Geneva, Messrs. Lambinet and
Lauvergeon updated the senior management of Parent, including
Mr. Carlo Bozotti, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Parent, regarding their recent meetings with the Company.
Parent’s senior management authorized the submission by
Parent of a non-binding indication of interest to the Company.
In connection therewith, Parent’s Management began
preparing materials regarding the potential transaction to be
presented to the Strategic Committee of the Supervisory Board of
Parent at its next regularly scheduled meeting on
October 23, 2007.
On October 17, 2007, in connection with the preparation of
Parent’s preliminary indication of interest and in
contemplation of a possible acquisition transaction, Parent
retained Shearman & Sterling LLP
(“Shearman & Sterling”) to act as its legal
counsel.
14
On October 18, 2007, representatives of Morgan Stanley and
senior management of Parent met in Geneva, Switzerland to
discuss a possible acquisition of the Company. At this meeting,
representatives of Morgan Stanley presented a preliminary
financial analysis of the Company.
On October 22, 2007, Parent engaged Morgan Stanley to act
as its financial advisor, which relationship was later
formalized in an engagement letter entered into by Parent and
Morgan Stanley on December 6, 2007.
On October 23, 2007, the Strategic Committee of the
Supervisory Board of Parent held its regularly scheduled
meeting. At this meeting, senior management of Parent reviewed
with the members of the Strategic Committee, among other
projects, a potential acquisition of the Company, including the
principal terms on which Parent might propose to acquire the
Company. The members of the Strategic Committee reviewed the
proposal from management, and authorized management to submit a
non-binding proposal to the Company consistent with the terms
presented to the Strategic Committee. Thereafter, senior
management of Parent and representatives of Morgan Stanley and
Shearman & Sterling participated in several conference
calls to finalize the terms of Parent’s non-binding
proposal.
On November 5, 2007, Parent sent a non-binding letter of
intent, dated November 4, 2007, to the Company, in which
Parent proposed to acquire the Company through a cash tender
offer, followed by a merger (the “Proposal”). The
Proposal indicated that, subject to satisfactory results of a
due diligence review of the Company, approval by the Supervisory
Board of Parent and certain other conditions, Parent would be
prepared to pay to the Company’s stockholders $9.50 per
Share in cash. Also on November 5, 2007, Parent provided
the Company with a preliminary due diligence request list, a
draft exclusivity agreement containing a provision for specified
money damages in the event of a breach by the Company of the
exclusivity agreement and an amendment to the confidentiality
agreement, which revised the terms of the confidentiality
agreements so that the confidentiality agreement would apply to
the discussions between the Company and Parent with respect to
the potential acquisition and also to the Company’s and
Parent’s advisors. Parent indicated that it was not
prepared to commence discussions and begin incurring expenses
until a satisfactory exclusivity agreement had been executed.
The letter of intent from Parent expired in accordance with its
terms on November 8, 2007, and was never executed by the
Company.
On November 7, 2007, Mr. Antoun communicated to Parent
that, during a Board meeting held that day, the Board had
determined that it was interested in entering into discussions
with Parent in response to the Proposal, but that it was not
prepared to execute the exclusivity agreement in the form
proposed, which was a pre-condition to Parent’s entering
into discussions. In particular, the Board was not prepared to
agree to pay specified money damages for a breach of the
exclusivity agreement. Mr. Antoun communicated to Parent
the need to revise the proposed exclusivity agreement prior to
commencement of any discussions.
On November 9, 2007, following a telephonic meeting of the
Board, Mr. Antoun reiterated to Parent that the Company
would not execute the exclusivity agreement in the form provided
and was not prepared to confirm its acceptance of the per Share
price proposed by Parent.
On November 11, 2007, Parent received from the Company a
revised draft of the exclusivity agreement and a new
confidentiality agreement, which contained a standstill
provision prohibiting the acquisition of Shares by Parent
without the Company’s consent and an employee
non-solicitation provision.
Over the next several days, representatives of
Shearman & Sterling and WSGR engaged in negotiation
with respect to the exclusivity agreement and the amendment to
the confidentiality agreement.
On November 15, 2007, Parent and the Company entered into
the amendment to the confidentiality agreement, dated as
November 14, 2007, and the exclusivity agreement, dated as
of November 14, 2007, which did not contain the provision
for specified money damages in the event of a breach by Genesis
of the exclusivity agreement. Thereafter, late on
November 16, 2007, Parent and the Company commenced
discussions regarding a possible acquisition of the Company by
Parent and Parent and its representatives were granted access to
the Company’s electronic data room for purposes of
Parent’s due diligence review of the Company.
From November 16, 2007 through November 20, 2007,
representatives of the Company, including Messrs. Antoun
and Yadegar, Ms. Shandell and Jeffrey Lin, General Counsel
and Secretary of the Company, held due diligence meetings with
representatives of Parent in Palo Alto, California.
Representatives of Goldman
15
Sachs and representatives of Morgan Stanley also participated in
these due diligence meetings. From November 20, 2007, until
execution of the merger agreement, Parent continued to request,
receive and review additional due diligence materials and
continued to meet periodically with the Company management.
During this period, Parent and its financial and legal advisors
participated in regular conference calls to discuss their
ongoing financial, legal, tax, accounting, and business due
diligence review of the Company and the results thereof to date.
Representatives of Shearman & Sterling reviewed
documents provided by the Company at the offices of WSGR in Palo
Alto, California and participated in meetings and conference
calls with the Company in connection with Parent’s legal
due diligence review of the Company.
On November 19, 2007, the Supervisory Board of Parent held
an extraordinary meeting in Paris, France to discuss potential
acquisition opportunities. At this meeting, senior management of
Parent updated the members of the Supervisory Board regarding
the strategic rationale for the proposed acquisition of the
Company, the Company’s reaction to Parent’s Proposal,
the structure and anticipated timing of the proposed acquisition
of the Company, the price per Share and premium to be offered by
Parent and the results of the due diligence review conducted by
Parent and its advisors to date. Following a discussion of these
matters, the Supervisory Board authorized Geneva’s
Management Board, which is comprised solely of Mr. Bozotti,
to negotiate and enter into an agreement for Parent to acquire
the Company, including by means of a cash tender offer, subject
to the financial and other parameters set by the Supervisory
Board.
On November 21, 2007, Parent delivered to the Company an
initial draft of an Agreement and Plan of Merger.
On November 26, 2007, representatives of WSGR and
Shearman & Sterling met in Palo Alto, California to
negotiate the draft Merger Agreement.
On November 27, 2007, the Company responded to Parent with
a memorandum and proposed revisions to Parent’s draft
Merger Agreement.
On November 28, 2007, Messrs. Lambinet and Lauvergeon
spoke by telephone with Mr. Antoun. During this call,
Messrs. Lambinet and Lauvergeon updated Mr. Antoun on
the status of Parent’s due diligence review and highlighted
for Mr. Antoun certain matters identified by Parent during
its due diligence. Messrs. Lambinet and Lauvergeon also
discussed with Mr. Antoun the possibility of
Mr. Antoun entering into an employment agreement with
Parent in the event that Parent and the Company were able to
agree upon the terms of an acquisition of the Company by Parent.
On November 30, 2007, Parent distributed a revised draft of
the Merger Agreement to the Company. Shearman &
Sterling and WSGR met on December 3, 2007 to negotiate the
outstanding issues in the Merger Agreement.
On December 4, 2007, Parent sent a further revised draft of
the Merger Agreement to the Company. Parent and its advisors
also participated in a conference call during which
representatives of Shearman & Sterling and various
employees of Parent involved in the due diligence review of the
Company presented the results of their review to date.
On December 5, 2007, Mr. Antoun and
Messrs. Lambinet and Lauvergeon held a meeting in
Santa Clara, California. At this meeting,
Messrs. Lambinet and Lauvergeon indicated that Parent was
still interested in pursuing a transaction with the Company, but
that, in light of Parent’s due diligence review, Parent was
revising its proposal to offer the Company’s stockholders
$8.25 per Share in cash. Parent also noted that the recent stock
price performance of the Company was a consideration for Parent.
On December 6, 2007, Parent requested that the Company
enter into an amendment to the exclusivity agreement, in order
to extend the exclusivity period which was set to expire at
11:59 p.m. that day, until December 10, 2007. Parent
did not receive a response from the Company prior to the
expiration of the exclusivity period that evening.
On December 7, 2007, following a meeting of the Board on
December 6, 2007 at which the Board discussed Parent’s
revised proposal, Mr. Antoun informed Parent that the
Company was not willing to proceed with a transaction at a price
of $8.25 per Share in cash. Following this communication, Parent
and its advisors held a series of conference calls to discuss
how to proceed in light of the Company’ response to
Parent’s revised proposal.
16
On December 8, 2007, following further conference calls
involving management of Parent and representatives of
Parent’s legal and financial advisors, Parent informed the
Company that it would be willing to proceed with a transaction
at a price of $8.65 per share. In addition, Parent provided
proposed resolutions with respect to key unresolved negotiation
issues with respect to the draft merger agreement. Parent also
indicated to the Company that this proposal was its best and
final offer.
Later that same day, following the adjournment until the
following day of a meeting of the Board at which the Board
considered, among other things, how to proceed in light of
Parent’s final offer, Mr. Antoun conveyed to Parent
the status of the Board’s deliberations prior to its
adjournment. In response to Mr. Antoun’s update,
representatives of Parent indicated Parent was not prepared to
increase its proposed price.
On December 9, 2007, representatives of Parent indicated
that Parent was seeking a response to its proposal before
5 p.m. that day, when members of its management were
returning to Europe to focus on other matters.
Later that same day, the Board resumed the meeting adjourned the
previous day. Following this meeting, representatives of WSGR
informed representatives of Shearman & Sterling that
the Board would be prepared to proceed at the proposed price of
$8.65 per Share, provided certain changes were implemented to
the Draft Merger Agreement to ensure greater certainty that the
transaction would be completed by Parent. Representatives of
WSGR then negotiated with Parent and representatives of
Shearman & Sterling the changes to the Draft Merger
Agreement requested by the Board.
On the afternoon of December 10, 2007, the Board held a
meeting in Palo Alto, California. Later that day, during an
adjournment of the Board meeting, representatives of WSGR
communicated to representatives of Shearman & Sterling
that the Board had instructed WSGR to seek additional changes to
the Merger Agreement, including additional clarification of the
closing conditions, to ensure greater certainty that Parent
would complete the transaction, prior to the Board approving the
transaction. After Parent agreed to these changes, the Board
resumed its meeting. Later that evening, representatives of WSGR
communicated to representatives of Shearman & Sterling
that the Board had unanimously determined that the merger
agreement was advisable and fair to and in the best interests of
the Company’s stockholders and approved and authorized the
Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the Offer and the Merger, authorized the execution of
the Merger Agreement and recommended that the Company’s
stockholders accept the Offer. Also on December 10, 2007, a
representative of Shearman & Sterling delivered to
Mr. Antoun a draft letter agreement pursuant to which
Parent offered Mr. Antoun employment effective as of the
consummation of the Offer. Mr. Antoun and a representative
of Shearman & Sterling discussed this draft agreement,
and Parent agreed to make certain changes to the draft agreement
in response to comments from Mr. Antoun. Mr. Antoun
had engaged separate legal counsel to advise him in connection
with his employment arrangement with Parent.
On December 10, 2007, Parent, the Company and Purchaser
executed the Merger Agreement and Mr. Antoun and Parent
entered into a letter agreement regarding Mr. Antoun’s
employment with the Company following the completion of the
Offer.
Early in the morning on December 11, 2007, Parent and the
Company issued a joint press release announcing the execution of
the Merger Agreement.
The
Merger Agreement
The following is a summary of certain provisions of the
Merger Agreement. This summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Merger Agreement, which is incorporated herein
by reference, and a copy of which has been filed as an Exhibit
to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (the
“Schedule TO”) filed by Purchaser and Parent with
the Commission in connection with the Offer. Capitalized terms
not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
therein in the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement may be
examined and copies may be obtained at the places set forth in
Section 7.
The Offer. The Merger Agreement provides for
the commencement of the Offer as promptly as reasonably
practicable, but in no event later than five business days after
the initial public announcement of Purchaser’s intention to
commence the Offer. The obligation of Purchaser to accept for
payment Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer is subject to the
satisfaction of the Minimum Condition and certain other
conditions that are described in
17
Section 14 hereof. Purchaser and Parent have agreed that
unless previously approved in writing by the Company no change
in the Offer may be made that (i) amends or waives the
Minimum Condition, (ii) decreases the price per Share
payable in the Offer, (iii) changes the form of
consideration to be paid in the Offer, (iv) reduces the
maximum number of Shares to be purchased in the Offer,
(v) imposes additional conditions to the Offer,
(vi) amends the conditions to the Offer so as to broaden
the scope of such conditions, (vii) extends the Offer,
except as provided for in the Merger Agreement, or
(viii) makes any other change to any of the terms and
conditions of the Offer that is adverse to the holders of the
Shares.
The Merger. The Merger Agreement provides
that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, and
in accordance with Delaware Law, Purchaser will be merged with
and into the Company. As a result of the Merger, the separate
corporate existence of Purchaser will cease and the Company will
continue as the Surviving Corporation and will become a wholly
owned subsidiary of Parent. Upon consummation of the Merger,
each issued and then outstanding Share will be cancelled and
cease to exist, and will be converted automatically into the
right to receive the Merger Consideration, except that: any
Shares held in the treasury of the Company, or owned by
Purchaser, Parent or any direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent or of the Company shall be cancelled
without any conversion thereof; and any Shares which are held by
stockholders who have not voted in favor of the Merger or
consented thereto in writing and who shall demand properly in
writing appraisal for such Shares will be cancelled and the
holders thereof may be entitled to receive payment of the
appraised value of such Shares in accordance with Delaware Law.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, of Purchaser issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into
and exchanged for one validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of the Surviving Corporation.
The Merger Agreement provides that the directors of Purchaser
immediately prior to the Effective Time will be the initial
directors of the Surviving Corporation and that the officers of
the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time will be the
initial officers of the Surviving Corporation. Subject to the
Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation, as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time, will be amended and
restated in its entirety to be identical to the Certificate of
Incorporation of Purchaser; provided, however,
that, at the Effective Time, Article I of the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation will be amended to
read as follows: “The name of the corporation is Genesis
Microchip Inc.” Subject to the Merger Agreement, at the
Effective Time, the By-laws of Purchaser, as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time, will be the By-laws of
the Surviving Corporation.
Stockholders’ Meeting. Pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, the Company shall, if required by applicable
law in order to consummate the Merger, duly call, give notice
of, convene and hold a special meeting of its stockholders as
promptly as practicable following consummation of the Offer for
the purpose of considering and taking action on the Merger
Agreement and the Merger (the “Stockholders’
Meeting”). If Purchaser acquires at least a majority of the
outstanding Shares in this Offer, Purchaser will have sufficient
voting power to approve the Merger, even if no other stockholder
votes in favor of the Merger.
Proxy Statement. The Merger Agreement provides
that the Company shall, if approval of the Company’s
stockholders is required by applicable law to consummate the
Merger, promptly following consummation of the Offer, file with
the Commission under the Exchange Act, and use its reasonable
best efforts to have cleared by the Commission as promptly as
practicable, a proxy statement and related proxy materials (the
“Proxy Statement”) with respect to the
Stockholders’ Meeting and shall cause the Proxy Statement
and all required amendments and supplements thereto to be mailed
to stockholders of the Company at the earliest practicable time.
The Company has agreed, subject to the Board’s applicable
fiduciary obligations, to include in the Proxy Statement, and
not subsequently withdraw or modify in any manner adverse to
Purchaser or Parent, the recommendation of the Board that the
stockholders of the Company adopt the Merger Agreement and the
Merger and to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain such
adoption. Parent and Purchaser have agreed to cause all Shares
then owned by them and their affiliates to be voted in favor of
adoption of the Merger Agreement and the Merger. The Merger
Agreement provides that, in the event that Purchaser acquires at
least 90% of the then outstanding Shares, Parent, Purchaser and
the Company will take all necessary and appropriate action to
cause the Merger to become effective, in accordance
18
with Delaware Law, as promptly as reasonably practicable after
such acquisition, without a meeting of the Company’s
stockholders.
Merger Option. Pursuant to the terms of the
Merger Agreement, the Company has granted to Parent and
Purchaser the Merger Option to purchase, following the
consummation of the Offer and subject to certain conditions and
limitations, newly issued Shares equal to the number of Shares
that, when added to the number of Shares owned by Parent and
Purchaser immediately following the consummation of the Offer,
shall equal one share more than 90% of the Shares then
outstanding on a diluted basis (as calculated in accordance with
the Merger Agreement). The Merger Option will be exercisable
only after the purchase of and payment for Shares pursuant to
the Offer as a result of which Parent and Purchaser beneficially
own at least 71% of the Shares.
Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the
Merger. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the
Company has agreed that, between the date of the Merger
Agreement and the date on which a majority of the Company’s
directors are designees of Purchaser (the “Appointment
Time”), unless Parent otherwise agrees in writing, the
businesses of the Company and its subsidiaries (the
“Subsidiaries” and each, individually, a
“Subsidiary”) shall, subject to limited exceptions, be
conducted only in, and the Company and the Subsidiaries shall
not take any action except in, the ordinary course of business
and in a manner consistent with past practice, and the Company
shall use its reasonable best efforts to preserve substantially
intact the business organization of the Company and the
Subsidiaries, to keep available the services of the current
officers, employees and consultants of the Company and the
Subsidiaries and to preserve the current relationships of the
Company and the Subsidiaries with customers, suppliers, and
other persons with which the Company or any Subsidiary has
significant business relations.
The Merger Agreement provides that subject to certain limited
exceptions until the Appointment Time neither the Company nor
any Subsidiary shall, directly or indirectly, do, or propose to
do, any of the following, without the prior written consent of
Parent:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
amend or otherwise change its Certificate of Incorporation or
By-laws or equivalent organizational documents;
|
| |
| |
•
|
issue, sell, pledge, dispose of, grant or encumber, or authorize
the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition, grant or encumbrance of
(i) any shares or units (if applicable) of any class of
capital stock or other type of equity interest of the Company or
any Subsidiary, or any options, warrants, convertible securities
or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares or units (as
applicable) of such capital stock or other type of equity
interest, or any other ownership interest, of the Company or any
Subsidiary (except for the issuance of a maximum of
6,628,083 Shares issuable pursuant to Company stock options
and Company stock awards outstanding on the date of the Merger
Agreement) or (ii) any assets (including intellectual
property) of the Company or any Subsidiary, except in the
ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past
practice;
|
| |
| |
•
|
declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise,
with respect to any of its capital stock, except for dividends
by any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
to the Company or any other Subsidiary;
|
| |
| |
•
|
reclassify, combine, split, subdivide or redeem or purchase or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of its capital
stock, except for the repurchase or reacquisition of securities
in connection with the termination of service of any employee,
director or consultant of the Company or any Subsidiary;
|
| |
| |
•
|
take any of the following actions or enter into or amend any
contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to
any of the following matters:
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
acquire (including, without limitation, by any business
combination transaction) any other business organization or any
division thereof or acquire any material amount of assets (other
than certain licenses of intellectual property of the Company
and the Subsidiaries and acquisitions of inventory and supplies
that are consistent with past practice);
|
| |
| |
•
|
incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or issue any debt
securities or assume, guarantee or endorse, or otherwise become
responsible for, the obligations of any person, or make any
loans or advances (except for advances of business expenses in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice),
or
|
19
|
|
|
| |
|
grant any security interest in any of its assets, except in the
ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
enter into any contract or agreement other than in the ordinary
course of business and consistent with past practice;
|
| |
| |
•
|
authorize any capital expenditure in any manner not reflected in
the capital budget of the Company furnished to Parent; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
renew or enter into any noncompete, exclusivity or similar
agreement that would restrict or limit, in any material respect,
the operations of the Company or its Subsidiaries or, after the
consummation of the Offer, Parent or its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
hire additional employees, except hiring in the ordinary course
of business and consistent with past practice, or increase the
compensation payable or to become payable or the benefits
provided to its directors, officers or employees, except for
increases in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice in salaries, wages, bonuses, incentives or
benefits of employees of the Company or any Subsidiary who are
not directors or officers of the Company;
|
| |
| |
•
|
grant any severance or termination pay to, or enter into any
employment or severance agreement with any director, officer or
other employee of the Company or of any Subsidiary;
|
| |
| |
•
|
establish, adopt, enter into or amend any collective bargaining,
bonus, profit-sharing, thrift, compensation, stock option,
restricted stock, pension, retirement, deferred compensation,
employment, termination, severance or other plan, agreement,
trust, fund, policy or arrangement for the benefit of any
director, officer or employee, except for such amendments as may
be necessary or desirable to cause any such plan, agreement,
trust, fund, policy or arrangement to comply with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code so as to avoid
the imposition of additional tax with respect thereto;
|
| |
| |
•
|
take any action, other than reasonable and usual actions in the
ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice,
with respect to accounting policies or procedures;
|
| |
| |
•
|
make any material tax election or settle or compromise any
material U.S. federal, state, local or
non-U.S. income
tax liability;
|
| |
| |
•
|
pay, discharge or satisfy any claim, liability or obligation
(absolute, accrued, asserted or unasserted, contingent or
otherwise), other than the payment, discharge or satisfaction,
in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past
practice, of liabilities reflected or reserved against in the
consolidated balance sheet of the Company and the Subsidiaries
as at March 31, 2007 or subsequently incurred in the
ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice;
|
| |
| |
•
|
amend, modify or consent to the termination of any material
contracts, or amend, waive, modify or consent to the termination
of the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s material rights
thereunder in a manner adverse in any material respect to the
Company;
|
| |
| |
•
|
commence or settle any litigation, suit, claim, action,
proceeding or investigation;
|
| |
| |
•
|
permit any material item of company registered intellectual
property to lapse or to be abandoned, dedicated, or disclaimed,
fail to perform or make any applicable filings, recordings or
other similar actions or filings, or fail to pay all required
fees and taxes required or advisable to maintain and protect its
interest in each and every material item of company registered
intellectual property;
|
| |
| |
•
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
recapitalization or other reorganization; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
announce an intention, enter into any formal or informal
agreement or otherwise make a commitment, to do any of the
foregoing.
|
Company Board Representation. The Merger
Agreement provides that, promptly upon the purchase by Purchaser
pursuant to the Offer of such number of Shares as satisfies the
Minimum Condition, and from time to time thereafter, Purchaser
shall be entitled to designate up to such number of directors,
rounded up to the next whole
20
number (but in no event more than one less than the total number
of directors on the Board), on the Board as shall give Purchaser
representation on the Board equal to the product of the total
number of directors on the Board (giving effect to the directors
elected pursuant to this sentence), multiplied by the percentage
that the aggregate number of Shares owned by Purchaser or any
affiliate of Purchaser following such purchase bears to the
total number of Shares then outstanding, and the Company shall,
at such time, promptly take all actions reasonably necessary to
cause Purchaser’s designees to be elected as directors of
the Company, including increasing the size of the Board or
seeking and accepting the resignations of incumbent directors,
or both. The Merger Agreement also provides that, at such times,
the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause
persons designated by Purchaser to constitute the same
percentage as persons designated by Purchaser shall constitute
of the Board of (i) each committee of the Board,
(ii) each board of directors (or other similar body) of
each Subsidiary, and (iii) each committee of each such
board, in each case only to the extent permitted by applicable
law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, until the Effective Time,
(A) the Board shall always have at least two directors who
were directors prior to the consummation of the Offer and who
are not affiliated with Parent or Purchaser (such directors, the
“Continuing Directors”); provided,
however, that, if any Continuing Director resigns from
the Board or is unable to serve due to death or disability or
any other reason, the remaining Continuing Directors shall be
entitled to elect or designate such resigning director’s
successor to fill the vacancy, and such director shall be deemed
to be a Continuing Director and (B) the Company shall use
its reasonable best efforts to ensure that at least two members
of each committee of the Board and of such boards and committees
of the Subsidiaries, as of the date hereof, who are not
employees of the Company, shall remain members of such committee
of the Board and of such boards and committees of the
Subsidiaries. The Merger Agreement also provides that if the
number of Continuing Directors is reduced to fewer than two for
any reason prior to the Effective Time, the remaining and
departing Continuing Directors shall be entitled to designate a
person to fill the vacancy or vacancies such that there shall be
at least two Continuing Directors, who shall thereafter be
deemed to be a Continuing Director.
The Merger Agreement provides that, following the Appointment
Time and prior to the Effective Time, any amendment of the
Merger Agreement or the Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws
of the Company, any termination of the Merger Agreement by the
Company, any agreement or consent to amend the Merger Agreement
by the Company, any extension by the Company of the time for the
performance, or any waiver, of any of the obligations or other
acts of Parent or Purchaser, any waiver of any of the
Company’s rights, benefits or privileges under the Merger
Agreement, any determination with respect to any action to be
taken or not to be taken by or on behalf of the Company relating
to the Merger Agreement or the Merger, or any approval of any
other action by the Company that is reasonably likely to
adversely affect the interests of the holders of Shares (other
than Parent, Purchaser and their affiliates) with respect to the
Merger, will require the concurrence of a majority of the
Continuing Directors (or the sole Continuing Director if there
shall be only one Continuing Director).
Access to Information. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, until the Effective Time, the Company shall, and
shall cause the Subsidiaries and the officers, directors,
employees, auditors and agents of the Company and the
Subsidiaries to, afford the officers, employees and
representatives of Parent and Purchaser reasonable access at all
reasonable times to the officers, employees, agents, properties,
offices, plants and other facilities, books and records of the
Company and each Subsidiary, and shall furnish Parent and
Purchaser with such financial, operating and other data and
information (“Company Data”) as Parent or Purchaser,
through its officers, employees or agents, may reasonably
request (it being agreed that the Company and its Subsidiaries
shall not be required to furnish any Company Data in any format
in which such Company Data did not exist prior to the request
therefor by Parent or Purchaser); provided,
however, the Company may restrict such access to the
extent that (A) any law, applicable to the Company or its
Subsidiaries requires the Company or its Subsidiaries to
restrict or prohibit such access, or (B) such access would
otherwise be in breach of any confidentiality obligation in any
agreement or contract or other obligation by which the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries is bound. Parent and Purchaser have
agreed to keep such information confidential, except in certain
circumstances.
No Solicitation of Transactions. The Company
has agreed that neither it nor any Subsidiary nor any of the
directors, officers or employees of it or any Subsidiary will,
and that it will not authorize or permit its and its
21
Subsidiaries’ agents, advisors, investment bankers,
financial advisors, attorneys, accountants or other
representatives to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate
the making, submission or announcement of any Transaction
Proposal (as defined below);
|
| |
| |
•
|
enter into or maintain or continue discussions or negotiations
with any person or entity with respect to or in order to obtain
a Transaction Proposal; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
agree to, approve, endorse or recommend any Transaction Proposal
or enter into any letter of intent or other agreement otherwise
relating to any Transaction Proposal (except as permitted as
described below).
|
The Company has agreed to notify Parent within one business day
if any Transaction Proposal, or any inquiry or contact with any
person with respect thereto, is made, specifying the material
terms and conditions thereof and the identity of the party
making such Transaction Proposal.
“Transaction Proposal” is defined in the Merger
Agreement to mean any proposal or offer that relates to any of
the following:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or other similar
transaction involving the Company or any Subsidiary;
|
| |
| |
•
|
any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other disposition of
assets or businesses that constitute or represent 15% or more of
the total revenue, operating income, earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) or assets of the
Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
|
| |
| |
•
|
any sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of 15% or more
of any class of equity securities of the Company or of any
Subsidiary; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
any tender offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would
result in any person beneficially owning 15% or more of any
class of equity securities of the Company or of any Subsidiary.
|
The Merger Agreement provides that, if at any time prior to the
Acceptance Time, the Company receives a written, bona fide
Transaction Proposal not solicited in violation of the Merger
Agreement or the Exclusivity Agreement described below, the
Company may:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
furnish nonpublic information to the person making the
Transaction Proposal and its employees and
representatives; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
engage in discussions or negotiations with such person and its
employees and representatives with respect to the Transaction
Proposal,
|
so long as prior to furnishing such information or entering into
such discussions, the Board:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
determines, in its good faith judgment (after having received
the advice of a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation), that such Transaction Proposal constitutes, or is
reasonably likely to result in, a Superior Proposal (as defined
below);
|
| |
| |
•
|
determines, in its good faith judgment after consultation with
independent legal counsel, that, in light of such Transaction
Proposal, the failure to take such action would be reasonably
likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under
applicable law;
|
| |
| |
•
|
provides written notice to Parent of its intent to furnish
information or enter into discussions with such person at least
24 hours prior to taking any such action; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
obtains from such person an executed confidentiality agreement.
|
“Superior Proposal” is defined in the Merger Agreement
to mean an unsolicited written bona fide offer, which did not
result from a breach of the Company’s non-solicit
obligations, made by a third party to consummate any Transaction
Proposal (i) that the Board determines, in its good faith
judgment (after having received the advice of a financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation), to be
(A) more favorable to the Company’s stockholders from
a financial point of view than the Offer and Merger and
(B) reasonably likely to be consummated on the terms so
22
proposed, taking into account all relevant financial,
regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal, including
any conditions, and (ii) for which financing, to the extent
required, is then committed; provided, however,
that for purposes of the definition of “Superior
Proposal”, the references to “15%” in the
definition of Transaction Proposal shall be deemed to be
references to “50%”.
The Company has agreed that neither the Board nor any committee
thereof shall:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
withdraw or modify, or propose to withdraw or modify, in any
manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser, the approval or
recommendation by the Board or any such committee of this
Agreement, the Offer, the Merger or any other Transaction,
|
| |
| |
•
|
take any action to make the provisions of Section 203 of
Delaware Law inapplicable to any transaction other than the
Transactions; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
approve or recommend, or cause or permit the Company to enter
into any letter of intent, agreement or obligation with respect
to, any Transaction Proposal (any of the foregoing actions, a
“Change of Recommendation”).
|
However, the Merger Agreement provides that if prior to the
Acceptance Time, the Board determines, in its good faith
judgment after consultation with independent legal counsel, that
the failure to make a Change of Recommendation would be
reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary
obligations under applicable law, the Board may make a Change of
Recommendation, but only if, prior to making such Change of
Recommendation:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Board provides written notice to Parent advising Parent that
it intends to effect a Change of Recommendation and the manner
in which it intends to do so and, if the Board shall have
previously received a Superior Proposal, specifying the material
terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal, identifying the
person making such Superior Proposal, providing to Parent copies
of the definitive forms of all agreements pertaining to such
Superior Proposal;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Board determines, after taking into account any
modifications to the terms of the Transactions that are proposed
by Parent within three or, in the event that the Company has
previously received a Superior Proposal, four business days of
Parent’s receipt of written notice from the Company, that a
failure to make such Change of Recommendation would be
reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under applicable Law; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
if the Board shall have previously received a Superior Proposal,
the Company simultaneously terminates the Merger Agreement and
pays to Parent the Termination Fee described below in accordance
with the Merger Agreement.
|
The Company has agreed that during the three or four business
day period, as the case may be, prior to its effecting a Change
in Recommendation, the Company and its employees, officers,
directors and representatives will negotiate in good faith with
Parent and its employees, officers, directors and
representatives regarding any revisions to the terms of the
Offer and Merger that are proposed by Parent.
The Merger Agreement does not prohibit the Board from making
certain disclosures contemplated by securities laws.
Employee Stock Options and Other Employee
Benefits. The Merger Agreement also provides
that, as of the Effective Time, the Company will take all
necessary action to terminate the Company’s 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan, 2003 Stock Plan, 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option
Plan, 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, 1997 Employee Stock
Option Plan, 1997 Non-Employee Stock Option Plan, 1997 Paradise
Stock Option Plan and 1997 Sage Stock Plan, each as amended
through the date of the Merger Agreement (the “Company
Stock Plans”). Under the Merger Agreement, neither Parent
nor Purchaser nor the Surviving Corporation will assume any
Company options to purchase Shares or Company stock awards
granted under the Company Stock Plans. At the Effective Time,
each outstanding Company stock option that is unexercised and
each outstanding Company stock award, whether or not vested or
exercisable as of such date, will be cancelled without any
action on the part of the holder thereof. Each holder of a
Company stock option that is outstanding and unexercised at the
Effective Time, whether or not vested or exercisable, and that
has an exercise price per Share that is less than the Per Share
Amount, and each holder of a Company stock award that is
outstanding at
23
the Effective Time, whether or not vested, will be entitled to
be paid by the Surviving Corporation, with respect to each Share
subject to the Company stock option, an amount in cash equal to
the excess, if any, of the Per Share Amount over the applicable
per share exercise price of such Company stock option, and, with
respect to each Share subject to the Company stock award, an
amount in cash equal to the Per Share Amount. Any such payment
will be subject to all applicable federal, state and local tax
withholding requirements.
Under the Merger Agreement, each holder of one or more Company
stock options that are outstanding and unexercised at the
Effective Time and that were eligible for exchange (the
“Eligible Options”) in accordance with the terms of
the Company’s Offer to Exchange Certain Outstanding Options
for Restricted Stock Units, dated October 18, 2007 (the
“Exchange Offer”) will be entitled to be paid by the
Surviving Corporation an amount in cash equal to the Per Share
Amount for each Share subject to or otherwise issuable pursuant
to the restricted stock unit award such holder would have
received had he or she tendered all of his or her Eligible
Options in the Exchange Offer and been granted restricted stock
unit awards in exchange therefor pursuant to the terms of the
Exchange Offer. By the terms of the Merger Agreement, all such
cash amounts will be paid at the same time or times the
corresponding restricted stock unit awards would have otherwise
vested pursuant to the Exchange Offer, subject to the same
vesting requirements set forth in the Exchange Offer, it being
understood that service with Parent, the Surviving Corporation
or any of their respective subsidiaries will constitute the
provision of services for the purposes of vesting in the right
to receive the cash payments contemplated hereby.
The Company has agreed to take all necessary actions to shorten
any pending offering period under the Company’s 2007
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) and
establish a new exercise date prior to the expiration of the
Offer, as of a date selected by Parent (the “ESPP
Date”). After the ESPP Date, all offering and purchase
periods pending under the ESPP will be terminated and no new
offering or purchasing periods will be commenced. In addition,
the Company has agreed to take all actions as may be necessary
in order to freeze the rights of the participants in the ESPP,
effective as of the date of the Merger Agreement, to existing
participants and existing participation levels.
Parent has agreed that, after the Effective Time, it will cause
the Surviving Corporation and its subsidiaries to honor in
accordance with their terms, all contracts, agreements,
arrangements, policies, plans and commitments of the Company and
its Subsidiaries as in effect immediately prior to the Effective
Time that are applicable to any current or former employees,
consultants or directors of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries. Following the Effective Time, Parent has agreed to
give each Company employee credit for prior service with the
Company or its Subsidiaries, including predecessor employers,
for purposes of (i) eligibility and vesting under any
employee benefit plan of Parent or its applicable subsidiary in
which such employee becomes eligible to participate at or
following the Effective Time, and (ii) determination of
benefits levels under any vacation or severance plan of Parent
or its subsidiaries in which such employee becomes eligible to
participate at or following the Effective Time. Parent has
agreed to give credit under those of its and its
subsidiaries’ welfare benefit plans in which Company
employees and their eligible dependents become eligible to
participate at or following the Effective Time, for all
co-payments made, amounts credited toward deductibles and
out-of-pocket maximums, and time accrued against applicable
waiting periods, by Company employees and their eligible
dependents, in respect of the plan year in which the Effective
Time occurs or the plan year in which such individuals are
transitioned to such plans from the corresponding Plans, and
Parent has agreed to waive all requirements for evidence of
insurability and pre-existing conditions otherwise applicable,
except as would also be applicable under the corresponding
Plans, to Company employees and their eligible dependents under
the employee heath plans of Parent and its subsidiaries,
including medical, dental, vision and prescription drug plans,
in which such individuals become eligible to participate at or
following the Effective Time.
Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification
Insurance. From and after the Effective Time,
Parent and the Surviving Corporation have agreed to maintain in
effect in all respects the current obligations of the Company
pursuant to any indemnification agreements between the Company
and its directors, officers and employees (the “Indemnified
Parties”) in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time
and any indemnification provisions under the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws of the Company as in effect on the
date of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement further
provides that the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of
the Surviving Corporation shall contain provisions with respect
to exculpation and indemnification that are no less favorable to
the Indemnified Parties than are set forth in the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws of the Company, which
24
provisions shall not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified
for a period of six years from the Effective Time in any manner
that would affect adversely the rights thereunder of the
Indemnified Parties, unless such modification is required by law
and then only to the minimum extent required by law.
The Merger Agreement also provides that Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to maintain in effect for six years from
the Effective Time, if available, the current directors’
and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by
the Company with respect to matters occurring prior to the
Effective Time; provided, however, that in no
event shall the Surviving Corporation be required to expend more
than an amount per year equal to 250% of the current annual
premiums paid by the Company for such insurance (which premiums
the Company has represented to Parent and Purchaser to be
$905,063 in the aggregate); provided, however, that, if
the annual premiums for such insurance exceed such amount or in
the event of an expiration, termination or cancellation of such
current policies, the Surviving Corporation shall be required to
obtain as much coverage as is possible under substantially
similar policies for such maximum annual amount in aggregate
annual premiums; provided, further that Parent and the
Surviving Corporation may satisfy their respective obligations
by obtaining, at the Effective Time, prepaid (or
“tail”) directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance policy, in each case, the material terms of which,
including coverage, amount and creditworthiness of the issuer,
are no less favorable to such directors and officers than the
insurance coverage otherwise required by the Merger Agreement.
In such event, the Merger Agreement provides that Parent and the
Surviving Corporation shall maintain such “tail”
policy in full force and effect and continue to honor their
respective obligations thereunder for the six-year tail period;
provided that in no event shall the Surviving Corporation
pay a premium for such “tail” policy that in the
aggregate exceeds $2,000,000.
Further Action; Reasonable Best Efforts. The
Merger Agreement provides that, subject to its terms and
conditions, each of the parties thereto shall (i) make
promptly its respective filings, and thereafter make any other
required submissions, under the HSR Act or other applicable
foreign, federal or state antitrust, competition or fair trade
laws with respect to the Merger Agreement or the transactions
contemplated thereby and (ii) use reasonable best efforts
to take, or cause to be taken, all appropriate action, and to do
or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable
under applicable laws and regulations to consummate and make
effective the Merger including, without limitation, using its
reasonable best efforts to obtain all permits, consents,
approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of
governmental authorities and parties to contracts with the
Company and the Subsidiaries as are necessary for the
consummation of the Merger and to fulfill the conditions to the
Offer and the Merger. In case, at any time after the Effective
Time, any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out
the purposes of the Merger Agreement, the proper officers and
directors of each party to the Merger Agreement are required to
use their reasonable best efforts to take all such action.
The Merger Agreement also provides that each of Parent,
Purchaser and the Company will cooperate and use their
respective reasonable best efforts to vigorously contest and
resist any litigation or other legal proceeding, including
administrative or judicial actions, and to have vacated, lifted,
reversed or overturned any decree, judgment, injunction or other
order that is in effect and that restricts, prevents or
prohibits consummation of the Merger including, without
limitation, by vigorously pursuing all available avenues of
administrative and judicial appeal.
Representations and Warranties. In the Merger
Agreement, Parent and Purchaser, on one hand, and the Company on
the other hand have made certain representations and warranties
to each other. The Merger Agreement has been included with the
Schedule TO to provide investors with information regarding
its terms and is not intended to provide any other factual
information about Parent, Purchaser or the Company. The
assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were
made for purposes of the Merger Agreement and are subject to
qualifications and limitations agreed to by the respective
parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the Merger
Agreement, including information contained in a confidential
disclosure letter that the parties exchanged in connection with
signing the Merger Agreement. Accordingly, investors and
security holders should not rely on such representations and
warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts or
circumstances, since they were only made as of a specific date
and are modified in important part by the underlying disclosure
schedules. In addition, certain representations and warranties
may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality
different from what might be viewed as material to stockholders,
or may have been used for purposes of allocating risk between
the respective parties rather than establishing matters of fact.
Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of such
representations and warranties may change after the date of the
Merger Agreement, which subsequent
25
information may or may not be fully reflected in Parent’s
or the Company’s public disclosures. For the foregoing
reasons, holders of Shares should not rely on the
representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement
as statements of factual information.
The Company’s representations and warranties relate to,
among other things:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ organization,
standing and qualification to do business;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Company’s subsidiaries;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Company’s corporate power and authority to enter into
the Merger Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Company’s capitalization, including in particular the
number of Shares outstanding and the number of Shares issuable
pursuant to outstanding Company stock options and stock awards;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the inapplicability of anti-takeover laws to the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement or any anti-takeover
provision in the Company’s charter documents;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the amendment of the Company’s “Rights Agreement”
to permit the execution of the Merger Agreement and the
consummation of the Offer and the Merger without triggering any
event under the Rights Agreement that would adversely affect
Parent or Purchaser.
|
| |
| |
•
|
the enforceability of the Merger Agreement against the Company;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of violations of or conflicts with the
Company’s and its subsidiaries’ governing documents,
applicable law or certain agreements as a result of entering
into the Merger Agreement and consummating the Offer and the
Merger;
|
| |
| |
•
|
permits and compliance with applicable legal requirements;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the timeliness and compliance with requirements of the
Company’s SEC filings since March 31, 2005, including
the accuracy and compliance with requirements of the financial
statements contained therein;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the consolidated financial position of the Company and its
Subsidiaries;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the accounts receivable and payable of the Company and its
Subsidiaries;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of certain changes or events since March 31,
2007;
|
| |
| |
•
|
legal proceedings and governmental orders;
|
| |
| |
•
|
matters relating to employee benefit plans, employment
agreements and labor;
|
| |
| |
•
|
compliance with applicable securities law of the information
supplied by the Company for inclusion in filings made with the
SEC in connection with the Offer and the Merger;
|
| |
| |
•
|
leased and owned properties;
|
| |
| |
•
|
intellectual property;
|
| |
| |
•
|
tax matters;
|
| |
| |
•
|
environmental matters;
|
| |
| |
•
|
material contracts and performance of obligations thereunder;
|
| |
| |
•
|
customers and suppliers;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Company’s products and services
|
| |
| |
•
|
insurance;
|
26
|
|
|
| |
•
|
certain business practices and related party transactions;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
board of directors of certain employment arrangements;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of certain transactions between the Company and any
director, officer or other affiliate of the Company;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of undisclosed brokers’ fees; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the receipt by the Company’s board of directors of a
fairness opinion from Goldman Sachs.
|
Many of the Company’s representations and warranties are
qualified by a “Material Adverse Effect” standard. For
the purposes of the Merger Agreement, “Material Adverse
Effect” means, when used in connection with the Company or
any Subsidiary, any event, circumstance, change or effect that,
individually or in the aggregate with any other events,
circumstances, changes, and effects, is or is reasonably likely
to (i) be materially adverse to the business, financial
condition, assets, liabilities or results of operations of the
Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole or
(ii) prevent or materially delay the ability of the Company
to perform its obligations under this Agreement or to consummate
the Transactions. However, no event, circumstance, change or
effect resulting from any of the following will be considered in
determining whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
changes, after the date of the Merger Agreement, in general
economic or political conditions or the conditions of the
financial markets in the United States or in any other country;
|
| |
| |
•
|
general changes, after the date of the Merger Agreement, in the
industries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate;
|
| |
| |
•
|
changes, after the date of the Merger Agreement, in law or in
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (or the interpretation
thereof by any governmental authority);
|
| |
| |
•
|
acts of terrorism or war, earthquakes, fires or other force
majeure events;
|
except to the extent that any of the foregoing affect the
Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a
disproportionate manner relative to other entities operating in
the industry or industries in which the Company and its
Subsidiaries operate.
In addition, no event, circumstance, change or effect resulting
from any of the following will be considered in determining
whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the public announcement of the Merger Agreement or the pendency
or consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
| |
| |
•
|
any failure by the Company to take any action prohibited by the
Merger Agreement or the taking by the Company of any action that
Parent has approved in advance or requested in writing;
|
| |
| |
•
|
any legal proceedings made or brought by any of the current or
former stockholders of the Company (on their own behalf or on
behalf of the Company) resulting from, relating to or arising
out of the Merger Agreement or the transaction contemplated
thereby;
|
| |
| |
•
|
any change, in and of itself, in the Company’s stock price
or the trading volume of the Company’s stock;
|
| |
| |
•
|
any failure, in and of itself, by the Company to meet any
published analyst estimates of the Company’s revenue,
earnings or results of operations for any period or any failure,
in and of itself, by the Company to meet its internal budgets,
plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or results of
operations (with respect to the matters described in this bullet
point and the preceding bullet point the Merger Agreement
provides that the facts or occurrences giving rise or
contributing to any such change or failure that are not
otherwise excluded from the definition of “Material Adverse
Effect” may be deemed to constitute, or be taken into
account in determining whether there has been, is or would be a
Material Adverse Effect).
|
27
The Merger Agreement also contains various representations and
warranties made by Parent and Purchaser that are subject, in
some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications. The
representations and warranties relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Parent’s and Purchaser’s organization, standing and
qualification to do business;
|
| |
| |
•
|
Parent’s and Purchaser’s corporate power and authority
to enter into the Merger Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the enforceability of the Merger Agreement against Parent and
Purchaser;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of violations of or conflicts with Parent’s and
Purchaser’s governing documents, applicable law or certain
agreements as a result of entering into the Merger Agreement and
consummating the Offer and the Merger;
|
| |
| |
•
|
sufficiency of funds to consummate the Offer and the Merger and
perform Purchaser’s obligations under the Merger Agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
compliance with applicable securities law of the information
supplied by Parent and Purchaser for inclusion in filings made
with the SEC in connection with the Offer and the
Merger; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the absence of undisclosed brokers’ fees.
|
Conditions to the Merger. Under the Merger
Agreement, the respective obligations of each party to effect
the Merger are subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the
Effective Time, of the following conditions:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
if and to the extent required by Delaware Law, the Merger
Agreement and the Merger shall have been adopted by the
affirmative vote of the stockholders of the Company;
|
| |
| |
•
|
no governmental authority of competent jurisdiction shall have
enacted any law or order (whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent) which is then in effect and has the effect of making
the acquisition of Shares by Parent or Purchaser or any
affiliate of either of them illegal or otherwise restricting,
preventing or prohibiting consummation of the Merger; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
Purchaser or its permitted assignee shall have purchased all
Shares validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the Offer.
|
Termination. The Merger Agreement may be
terminated and the Merger and the Offer may be abandoned at any
time prior to the Acceptance Time in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
by mutual written consent of Parent, Purchaser and the
Company; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
by any of Parent, Purchaser or the Company if:
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Offer shall have expired or been terminated in accordance
with the terms hereof without Purchaser having accepted for
payment any Shares pursuant to the Offer on or before
March 15, 2008 (the “Initial Termination Date”);
provided, however, that in the event that the
Antitrust Condition shall not have been satisfied on or prior to
the Initial Termination Date, either Parent or the Company may
elect to extend the Initial Termination Date until May 15,
2008; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
any governmental authority shall have enacted, issued,
promulgated, enforced or entered any injunction, order, decree
or ruling which is then in effect and has the effect of making
consummation of the Offer or the Merger illegal or otherwise
preventing or prohibiting consummation of the Offer or the
Merger, which injunction, order, decree or ruling is final and
nonappealable;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Company shall have breached the Merger Agreement, such that
the conditions to the Offer set forth in Section 14,
clause (e) regarding the Company’s representations or
warranties in the Merger Agreement, or Section 14,
clause (f) regarding covenants and agreements of the
Company contained in the Merger Agreement, respectively, would
not be satisfied (and such breach is not cured within
45 days following notice of such breach);
|
28
|
|
|
| |
•
|
prior to the Acceptance Time, the Board or any committee thereof
shall have approved or recommended a Change of Recommendation;
|
| |
| |
•
|
prior to the Acceptance Time, the Company shall have suffered a
material adverse effect, which shall not have been cured within
45 calendar days following notice thereof from Parent;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Parent or Purchaser shall have breached any covenant, agreement,
representation or warranty, but only to the extent that such
breach would prevent or materially delay the ability of Parent
or Purchaser to consummate the Offer or the Merger (and such
breach is not cured within 45 days following notice of such
breach);
|
| |
| |
•
|
it makes a Change of Recommendation in order to enter into an
agreement for a Superior Proposal in compliance with its
non-solicit obligations under the Merger Agreement.
|
Effect of Termination. In the event of the
termination of the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement will
become void, and there will be no liability on the part of any
party thereto, except (i) as set forth below under the
section entitled “Fees and Expenses” and
(ii) nothing in the Merger Agreement will relieve any party
from liability for any intentional and material breach thereof
prior to the date of such termination, provided,
however, that certain confidentiality obligations will
survive any termination of the Merger Agreement.
Fees and Expenses. The Company will be
required to pay a $11,650,000 million termination fee (the
“Termination Fee”) to Parent if the Merger Agreement
is terminated:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
by the Company in order to accept a Superior Proposal; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
by Parent or Purchaser following a Change of Recommendation by
the Company.
|
The Company will also be required to pay the Termination Fee to
Parent if:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Merger Agreement is terminated by Parent, Purchaser or the
Company as a result of a failure to complete the Offer prior to
the Initial Termination Date or the Extended Termination Date
or, as applicable, by Parent or Purchaser following a breach of
any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement such that
the conditions to the Offer remain unsatisfied after the
45 day cure period,
|
| |
| |
•
|
at the time of such termination, the Company has breached any of
its covenant or agreements not to solicit alternative
transactions or has intentionally and materially breached any
other covenant, agreement, representation or warranty of the
Company in the Merger Agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
at the time of such termination, Parent and Purchaser have
complied, in all material respects, with their respective
obligations under the Merger Agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
following the execution of the Merger Agreement and prior to the
termination of the Merger Agreement, a third party has made a
Transaction Proposal and has not withdrawn such Transaction
Proposal; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
within twelve (12) months following the termination of the
Merger Agreement, either a Transaction Proposal is consummated
or the Company enters into a definitive agreement providing for
a Transaction Proposal and such Transaction Proposal is later
consummated.
|
In addition, the Company will also be required to pay the
Termination Fee to Parent if:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Merger Agreement is terminated by Parent, Purchaser or the
Company as a result of a failure to complete the Offer prior to
the Initial Termination Date or the Extended Termination Date,
as applicable;
|
| |
| |
•
|
at the time of such termination, all conditions to the Offer,
other than the Minimum Condition are satisfied;
|
| |
| |
•
|
following the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the
termination of the Merger Agreement, a third party publicly
makes a Transaction Proposal and has not publicly withdrawn such
Transaction Proposal;
|
29
|
|
|
| |
•
|
within twelve months following the termination of the Merger
Agreement, either a Transaction Proposal is consummated or the
Company enters into a definitive agreement providing for a
Transaction Proposal and such Transaction Proposal is later
consummated.
|
Except as set forth in the Merger Agreement, all costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement, the
Offer and the Merger will be paid by the party incurring such
expenses, whether or not any transaction contemplated hereby or
thereby is consummated.
Employment
Agreement with Mr. Elias Antoun
The following is a summary of certain provisions of the
Employment Agreement entered into by Parent and Mr. Elias
Antoun, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
Employment Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference,
and a copy of which has been filed as an Exhibit to the
Schedule TO filed by Purchaser and Parent with the
Commission in connection with the Offer. The Employment
Agreement may be examined and copies may be obtained at the
places set forth in Section 7.
On December 10, 2007, in connection with the execution of
the Merger Agreement, Elias Antoun, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Genesis entered into a letter agreement
(the “Letter Agreement”) with Parent, pursuant
to which Parent offered Mr. Antoun employment effective as
of the Acceptance Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement).
Mr. Antoun will serve as Group Vice President, TV and
Monitors Division General Manager of Parent. In the event
that the Acceptance Time does not occur, the Letter Agreement
will be null and void. Mr. Antoun’s employment with
Parent is an at-will employment arrangement whereby either
Parent or Mr. Antoun may terminate Mr. Antoun’s
employment with Parent at any time, with or without reason. If
Mr. Antoun’s employment is terminated on or prior to
December 31, 2009, other than for cause, he will be
entitled to receive his base salary and health insurance
coverage for 12 months, as well as prorated payments of his
annual bonus and a portion of his special performance bonus for
the year.
Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement, Mr. Antoun
will receive a base salary of $400,000 per year. In addition,
Mr. Antoun will be eligible to (i) participate in
Parent’s annual bonus plan and, subject to the terms of the
annual bonus plan, to receive payment of an annual bonus of up
to 30% of his base salary, (ii) receive special
performance-based bonuses for each of the 2008, 2009 and 2010
calendar years of up to 30% of base salary for 2008, 25% of base
salary for 2009 and 20% of base salary for 2010, based on the
achievement of agreed upon performance goals and
(iii) receive an employee retention bonus of up to 25% of
base salary for 2008 and 20% of base salary for 2009, based on
the achievement of specified employee retention goals for the
applicable year. A portion of the performance bonuses will be
automatically deferred and paid in 2011 and the employee
retention bonus will be paid in 2010. Mr. Antoun will also
be eligible to receive an award under Parent’s performance
share plan of 7,500 common shares of Parent for each of 2008,
2009 and 2010, as well as a monthly car allowance.
Confidentiality
and Exclusivity Agreements
The following summaries of the Confidentiality Agreement and
the Exclusivity Agreement are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the Confidentiality Agreement and the Exclusivity
Agreement, which are incorporated herein by reference and a
copies of which are filed as exhibits to the Schedule TO
that Parent and Purchaser have filed with the SEC. The
Confidentiality Agreement and the Exclusivity Agreements may be
examined and copies may be obtained in the manner set forth in
Section 7.
The Company and Parent entered into a Confidentiality Agreement,
dated November 14, 2007 (the “Confidentiality
Agreement”), to allow the exchange of information in
connection with the exploration of a possible transaction
between Parent and the Company. Under the Confidentiality
Agreement, the parties agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to
keep confidential any non-public information provided by the
other party and Parent and the Company agreed to certain
“standstill” provisions.
The Company and Parent also entered into an exclusivity
agreement, dated November 14, 2007 (the “Exclusivity
Agreement”). Under the Exclusivity Agreement, the Company
agreed that through the earlier of
30
(i) the execution of a definitive transaction agreement and
(ii) 11:59 p.m. on December 6, 2007, the Company
and its Subsidiaries and their respective employees, affiliates,
agents and representatives, would not:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
solicit inquiries, proposals or offers from any third party
relating to any acquisition or purchase of all or any portion of
the capital stock of the Company or any Subsidiary,
|
| |
| |
•
|
enter into any business combination agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
enter into any other extraordinary business transaction outside
the ordinary course of business involving or otherwise relating
to the Company; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
participate in any discussions, conversations, negotiations or
other communications with any other person regarding, or furnish
to any other Person any information with respect to, any of the
foregoing.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Purpose
of the Offer; Plans for the Company After the Offer and the
Merger.
|
Purpose of the Offer. The Offer is being made
pursuant to the Merger Agreement. The purpose of the Offer and
the Merger is for Parent to acquire control of, and the entire
equity interest in, the Company. The Offer, as the first step in
the acquisition of the Company, is intended to facilitate the
acquisition of all of the Shares. The purpose of the Merger is
for Parent to acquire all Shares not purchased pursuant to the
Offer. Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will become
a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.
Under Delaware Law, the approval of the Board and the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Shares is required to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby. The Board has unanimously
determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including each of the Offer and the
Merger, are fair to and in the best interests of the holders of
Shares, has approved and authorized the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including each of the Offer
and the Merger, and recommends that the holders of Shares accept
the Offer and tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer. Unless
the Merger is consummated pursuant to the short-form merger
provisions under Delaware Law described below, the only
remaining required corporate action of the Company is the
approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of
the Merger by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the Shares. Accordingly, if the Minimum Condition is
satisfied, Purchaser will have sufficient voting power to cause
the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval
of the Merger without the affirmative vote of any other
stockholder.
In the Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed to duly call,
give notice of, convene and hold a special meeting of its
stockholders as promptly as practicable following consummation
of the Offer for the purpose of considering and taking action on
the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
if such action is required by Delaware Law in order to
consummate the Merger. Parent and Purchaser have agreed that all
Shares owned by them and their subsidiaries will be voted in
favor of the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement and
the Merger.
The Merger Agreement provides that, promptly upon the purchase
by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer of such number of Shares as
satisfies the Minimum Condition, Purchaser will be entitled to
designate representatives to serve on the Board in proportion to
Purchaser’s ownership of Shares following such purchase.
See Section 10. Purchaser expects that such representation
would permit Purchaser to exert substantial influence over the
Company’s conduct of its business and operations.
Short-Form Merger. Under Delaware Law, if
Purchaser acquires, pursuant to the Offer, the Merger Option, or
otherwise, at least 90% of the then outstanding Shares,
Purchaser will be able to approve the Merger without a vote of
the Company’s stockholders. In such event, Parent,
Purchaser and the Company have agreed in the Merger Agreement to
take, at the request of Purchaser, all necessary and appropriate
action to cause the Merger to become effective as promptly as
reasonably practicable after such acquisition, without a meeting
of the Company’s stockholders. If, however, Purchaser does
not acquire at least 90% of the outstanding Shares pursuant to
the Offer, the Merger Option, or otherwise, and a vote of the
Company’s stockholders is required under Delaware Law, a
significantly longer period of time would be required to effect
the Merger.
31
Appraisal Rights. No appraisal rights are
available in connection with the Offer. However, if the Merger
is consummated, stockholders who have not tendered their Shares
will have certain rights under Delaware Law to dissent from the
Merger and demand appraisal of, and to receive payment in cash
of the fair value of, their Shares. Stockholders who perfect
such rights by complying with the procedures set forth in
Section 262 of the Delaware Law
(“Section 262”) will have the “fair
value” of their Shares (exclusive of any element of value
arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger)
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and will be
entitled to receive a cash payment equal to such fair value for
the Surviving Corporation. In addition, such dissenting
stockholders would be entitled to receive payment of a fair rate
of interest from the date of consummation of the Merger on the
amount determined to be the fair value of their Shares. In
determining the fair value of the Shares, the court is required
to take into account all relevant factors. Accordingly, such
determination could be based upon considerations other than, or
in addition to, the market value of the Shares, including, among
other things, asset values and earning capacity. In
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court
stated, among other things, that “proof of value by any
techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable
in the financial community and otherwise admissible in
court” should be considered in an appraisal proceeding. The
Weinberger court also noted that under Section 262,
fair value is to be determined “exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the
merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor,
Inc., however, the Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in
the context of a two-step cash merger, “to the extent that
value has been added following a change in majority control
before cash-out, it is still value attributable to the going
concern,” to be included in the appraisal process. As a
consequence, the value so determined in any appraisal proceeding
could be the same, more or less than the purchase price per
Share in the Offer or the Merger Consideration.
In addition, several decisions by Delaware courts have held
that, in certain circumstances, a controlling stockholder of a
company involved in a merger has a fiduciary duty to other
stockholders which requires that the merger be fair to such
other stockholders. In determining whether a merger is fair to
minority stockholders, Delaware courts have considered, among
other things, the type and amount of consideration to be
received by the stockholders and whether there was fair dealing
among the parties. The Delaware Supreme Court stated in
Weinberger and Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical
Corp. that the remedy ordinarily available to minority
stockholders in a cash-out merger is the right to appraisal
described above. However, a damages remedy or injunctive relief
may be available if a merger is found to be the product of
procedural unfairness, including fraud, misrepresentation or
other misconduct.
The foregoing summary of the rights of dissenting stockholders
under Delaware Law does not purport to be a complete statement
of the procedures to be followed by stockholders desiring to
exercise any dissenters’ rights under Delaware Law. The
preservation and exercise of dissenters’ rights require
strict adherence to the applicable provisions of Delaware Law.
Going Private Transactions. The Commission has
adopted
Rule 13e-3
under the Exchange Act which is applicable to certain
“going private” transactions and which may under
certain circumstances be applicable to the Merger or another
business combination following the purchase of Shares pursuant
to the Offer in which Purchaser seeks to acquire the remaining
Shares not held by it. Purchaser believes that
Rule 13e-3
will not be applicable to the Merger.
Rule 13e-3
requires, among other things, that certain financial information
concerning the Company and certain information relating to the
fairness of the proposed transaction and the consideration
offered to minority stockholders in such transaction be filed
with the Commission and disclosed to stockholders prior to
consummation of the transaction.
Plans for the Company. It is expected that,
initially following the Merger, the business and operations of
the Company will, except as set forth in this Offer to Purchase,
be continued by the Company substantially as they are currently
being conducted. Parent will continue to evaluate the business
and operations of the Company during the pendency of the Offer
and after the consummation of the Offer and the Merger, and will
take such actions as it deems appropriate under the
circumstances then existing. Parent intends to seek additional
information about the Company during this period. Thereafter,
Parent intends to review such information as part of a
comprehensive review of the Company’s business, operations,
capitalization and management with a view to optimizing
exploitation of the Company’s potential in conjunction with
Parent’s businesses. It is expected that the business and
operations of the Company would form an important part of
Parent’s future business plans.
32
Except as indicated in this Offer to Purchase, Parent does not
have any present plans or proposals which relate to or would
result in (i) any extraordinary transaction, such as a
merger, reorganization or liquidation of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries, (ii) any purchase, sale or transfer of a
material amount of assets of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, (iii) any material change in the
Company’s present indebtedness, capitalization or dividend
rate or policy, (iv) any change in the present board of
directors or management of the Company, (v) any other
material change in the Company’s corporate structure or
business, (vi) any class of equity security of the Company
being delisted from a national stock exchange or ceasing to be
authorized to be quoted in an automated quotations system
operated by a national securities association, or (vii) any
class of equity securities of the Company becoming eligible for
termination of registration under Section 12(g)(4) of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
12.
|
Dividends
and Distributions.
|
As discussed in Section 10, pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, without the prior approval of Parent, the Company has
agreed not to declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or
make any other distributions (whether in cash, stock or
property) in respect of, any of its capital stock or other
equity or voting interests, except for dividends by a direct or
indirect wholly owned Subsidiary to the Company or any other
Subsidiary.
|
|
|
13.
|
Possible
Effects of the Offer on the Market for Shares, Nasdaq Listing,
Margin Regulations and Exchange Act Registration.
|
Possible Effects of the Offer on the Market for the
Shares. The purchase of Shares by Purchaser
pursuant to the Offer will reduce the number of Shares that
might otherwise trade publicly and will reduce the number of
holders of Shares, which could adversely affect the liquidity
and market value of the remaining Shares held by the public.
Parent intends to cause the delisting of the Shares by Nasdaq
following consummation of the Merger.
Nasdaq Listing. Depending upon the number of
Shares purchased pursuant to the Offer, the Shares may no longer
meet the standards for continued listing on Nasdaq. According to
Nasdaq’s published guidelines, the Shares would not be
eligible to be included for listing if, among other things, the
number of Shares publicly held falls below 750,000, the number
of holders of Shares falls below 400 or the market value of such
publicly held Shares is not at least $5,000,000. If, as a result
of the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer, the Merger or
otherwise, the Shares no longer meet the requirements of Nasdaq
for continued listing, the listing of the Shares will be
discontinued. In such event, the market for the Shares would be
adversely affected. In the event the Shares were no longer
eligible for listing on Nasdaq, quotations might still be
available from other sources. The extent of the public market
for the Shares and the availability of such quotations would,
however, depend upon the number of holders of such Shares
remaining at such time, the interest in maintaining a market in
such Shares on the part of securities firms, the possible
termination of registration of such Shares under the Exchange
Act as described below and other factors.
Exchange Act Registration. The Shares are
currently registered under the Exchange Act. Such registration
may be terminated upon application by the Company to the
Commission if the Shares are not listed on a “national
securities exchange” and there are fewer than 300 record
holders. The termination of the registration of the Shares under
the Exchange Act would substantially reduce the information
required to be furnished by the Company to holders of Shares and
to the Commission and would make certain provisions of the
Exchange Act, such as the short-swing profit recovery provisions
of Section 16(b), the requirement of furnishing a proxy
statement or information statement in connection with
stockholders’ meetings pursuant to Section 14(a) or
14(c) of the Exchange Act and the related requirements of an
annual report, and the requirements of
Rule 13e-3
under the Exchange Act with respect to “going private”
transactions, no longer applicable to the Shares. In addition,
“affiliates” of the Company and persons holding
“restricted securities” of the Company may be deprived
of the ability to dispose of such securities pursuant to
Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. If registration of the Shares under the Exchange Act
were terminated, the Shares would no longer be eligible for
Nasdaq reporting. Purchaser currently intends to seek to cause
the Company to terminate the registration of the Shares under
the Exchange Act as soon after consummation of the Offer as the
requirements for termination of registration are met.
Margin Regulations. The Shares are currently
“margin securities”, as such term is defined under the
rules of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(the “Federal Reserve Board”), which has the effect,
among
33
other things, of allowing brokers to extend credit on the
collateral of such securities. Depending upon factors similar to
those described above regarding listing and market quotations,
following the Offer it is possible that the Shares might no
longer constitute “margin securities” for purposes of
the margin regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, in which
event such Shares could no longer be used as collateral for
loans made by brokers. In addition, if registration of the
Shares under the Exchange Act were terminated, the Shares would
no longer constitute “margin securities”.
|
|
|
14.
|
Certain
Conditions of the Offer.
|
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Offer, but subject to
the terms of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser shall not be
required to accept for payment any Shares tendered pursuant to
the Offer, and may extend, terminate or amend the Offer if
(i) immediately prior to the expiration of the Offer, the
Minimum Condition shall not have been satisfied, (ii) any
applicable waiting period under the HSR Act or the antitrust
laws the People’s Republic of China, the Federal Republic
of Germany, the Republic of Hungary and the Republic of Korea
shall not have expired or been terminated prior to the
expiration of the Offer or (iii) prior to the Expiration
Date, any of the following conditions shall exist and be
continuing:
(a) there shall have been instituted or be pending any
litigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation by
any governmental authority, (i) challenging or seeking to
make illegal, materially delay, or otherwise, directly or
indirectly, restrain or prohibit or make materially more costly,
the making of the Offer, the acceptance for payment of any
Shares by Parent, Purchaser or any other affiliate of Parent,
the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Merger Option, or the
consummation of any other transaction contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, or seeking to obtain material damages in connection
with any transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
(ii) seeking to prohibit or limit materially the ownership
or operation by the Company, Parent or any of their subsidiaries
of all or any of the business or assets of the Company, Parent
or any of their subsidiaries or to compel the Company, Parent or
any of their subsidiaries as a result of any of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement, to divest or to hold
separate, or enter into any licensing or similar arrangement
with respect to, all or any portion of the business or assets
(whether tangible or intangible) of the Company, Parent or any
of their subsidiaries, that is material to either Parent and its
subsidiaries or the Company and its subsidiaries, in each case,
taken as a whole; (iii) seeking to impose or confirm any
limitation on the ability of Parent, Purchaser or any other
affiliate of Parent to exercise effectively full rights of
ownership of any Shares, including, without limitation, the
right to vote any Shares acquired by Purchaser pursuant to the
Offer or the Merger Option or otherwise on all matters properly
presented to the Company’s stockholders including, without
limitation, the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby; (iv) seeking to require
divestiture by Parent, Purchaser or any other affiliate of
Parent of any Shares; or (v) which otherwise would have a
Material Adverse Effect;
(b) any Governmental Authority or court of competent
jurisdiction shall have issued an order, decree, injunction or
ruling or taken any other action permanently restraining,
enjoining or otherwise prohibiting or materially delaying or
preventing the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement
and such order, decree, injunction, ruling or other action shall
have become final and non-appealable;
(c) there shall have been any statute, rule, regulation,
legislation or interpretation enacted, promulgated, amended,
issued or deemed applicable to (i) Parent, the Company or
any subsidiary or affiliate of Parent or the Company or
(ii) any transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement,
by any United States or
non-United
States legislative body or Governmental Authority with
appropriate jurisdiction, other than the routine application of
the waiting period provisions of the HSR Act or foreign
antitrust laws to the Offer or the Merger, that is reasonably
likely to result in any of the consequences referred to in
clauses (i) through (v) of paragraph (a) above;
(d) any Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred since
the date of the Merger Agreement;
(e) (i) the representations and warranties of the
Company contained in Section 4.03(a)(Capitalization) of the
Merger Agreement shall not be true and correct (except for
inaccuracies regarding the number of Shares, Company stock
options or Company stock awards that in the aggregate are less
than 0.5% of the outstanding Shares on a diluted basis as of the
date of the Merger Agreement and calculated in accordance with
the Merger
34
Agreement), or (ii) the representations and warranties of
the Company contained in Section 4.14 (Intellectual
Property) of the Merger Agreement shall not be true and correct
in all material respects (without giving effect to any
qualifications or limitations as to materiality or Material
Adverse Effect set forth therein) or (iii) the
representations and warranties of the Company contained in any
other section of the Merger Agreement shall not be true and
correct (without giving effect to any qualifications or
limitations as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect set
forth therein), in each of cases (i), (ii) and (iii), as of
the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the date of
determination as though made on the date of determination
(except to the extent that such representation or warranty
expressly relates to a specified date, in which case as of such
specified date), except, in the case of clause (ii), where the
failure of such representations and warranties to be true and
correct in all material respects as of such dates is not
material to the business of the Company and the Subsidiaries as
currently conducted, taken as a whole, and in the case of clause
(iii), where the failure of such representations and warranties
to be true and correct as of such dates, has not had a Material
Adverse Effect;
(f) the Company shall have failed to perform, in any
material respect, any obligation or to comply, in any material
respect, with any agreement or covenant of the Company to be
performed or complied with by it under the Merger Agreement;
(g) the Merger Agreement shall have been terminated in
accordance with its terms; or
(h) the Company shall not have furnished Parent immediately
prior to the expiration of the Offer with a certificate signed
on the Company’s behalf by its Chief Executive Officer or
Chief Financial Officer attesting to the conditions set forth in
items (e) and (f) above;
and which, in the reasonable and good faith judgment of
Purchaser in any such case, and regardless of the circumstances
(including any action or inaction by Parent or any of its
affiliates) giving rise to any such condition, makes it
inadvisable to proceed with such acceptance for payment.
The foregoing conditions are for the sole benefit of Purchaser
and Parent and may be asserted by Purchaser or Parent regardless
of the circumstances giving rise to any such condition or,
subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, may be waived by
Purchaser or Parent in whole or in part at any time and from
time to time prior to the expiration of the Offer in their sole
discretion. The failure by Parent or Purchaser at any time to
exercise any of the foregoing rights shall not be deemed a
waiver of any such right; the waiver of any such right with
respect to particular facts and other circumstances shall not be
deemed a waiver with respect to any other facts and
circumstances; and each such right shall be deemed an ongoing
right that may be asserted at any time and from time to time
prior to the expiration of the Offer.
|
|
|
15.
|
Certain
Legal Matters and Regulatory Approvals.
|
General. Based upon its examination of
publicly available information with respect to the Company and
the review of certain information furnished by the Company to
Parent and discussions between representatives of Parent and
representatives of the Company during Parent’s
investigation of the Company (see Section 10), neither
Purchaser nor Parent is aware of (i) any license or other
regulatory permit that appears to be material to the business of
the Company or any of its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, which
might be adversely affected by the acquisition of Shares by
Purchaser pursuant to the Offer or (ii) except as set forth
below, of any approval or other action by any domestic (federal
or state) or foreign Governmental Authority which would be
required prior to the acquisition of Shares by Purchaser
pursuant to the Offer. Should any such approval or other action
be required, it is Purchaser’s present intention to seek
such approval or action. Purchaser does not currently intend,
however, to delay the purchase of Shares tendered pursuant to
the Offer pending the outcome of any such action or the receipt
of any such approval (subject to Purchaser’s right to
decline to purchase Shares if any of the conditions in
Section 14 shall have occurred). There can be no assurance
that any such approval or other action, if needed, would be
obtained without substantial conditions or that adverse
consequences might not result to the business of the Company,
Purchaser or Parent or that certain parts of the businesses of
the Company, Purchaser or Parent might not have to be disposed
of or held separate or other substantial conditions complied
with in order to obtain such approval or other action or in the
event that such approval was not obtained or such other action
was not taken. Purchaser’s obligation under the Offer to
accept for payment and pay for Shares is subject to certain
conditions, including conditions relating to the legal matters
discussed in this Section 15. See Section 14 for
certain conditions of the Offer.
35
State Takeover Laws. The Company is
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. In
general, Section 203 of Delaware Law prevents an
“interested stockholder” (generally a person who owns
or has the right to acquire 15% or more of a corporation’s
outstanding voting stock, or an affiliate or associate thereof)
from engaging in a “business combination” (defined to
include mergers and certain other transactions) with a Delaware
corporation for a period of three years following the date such
person became an interested stockholder unless, among other
things, prior to such date the board of directors of the
corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction in which the interested stockholder became an
interested stockholder. On December 10, 2007, prior to the
execution of the Merger Agreement, the Board by unanimous vote
of all directors present at a meeting held on such date,
approved the Merger Agreement, the Offer and the Merger and
determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including each of the Offer and the
Merger, are advisable and, taken together, are fair to, and in
the best interests of, the stockholders of the Company.
Accordingly, Section 203 is inapplicable to the Offer and
the Merger.
A number of other states have adopted laws and regulations
applicable to attempts to acquire securities of corporations
which are incorporated, or have substantial assets,
stockholders, principal executive offices or principal places of
business, or whose business operations otherwise have
substantial economic effects, in such states. In
Edgar v. MITE Corp., the Supreme Court of the United
States invalidated on constitutional grounds the Illinois
Business Takeover Statute, which, as a matter of state
securities law, made takeovers of corporations meeting certain
requirements more difficult. However, in 1987 in CTS
Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America, the Supreme Court
held that the State of Indiana may, as a matter of corporate law
and, in particular, with respect to those aspects of corporate
law concerning corporate governance, constitutionally disqualify
a potential acquiror from voting on the affairs of a target
corporation without the prior approval of the remaining
stockholders. The state law before the Supreme Court was by its
terms applicable only to corporations that had a substantial
number of stockholders in the state and were incorporated there.
The Company, directly or through its subsidiaries, conducts
business in a number of states throughout the United States,
some of which have enacted takeover laws. Purchaser does not
know whether any of these laws will, by their terms, apply to
the Offer or the Merger and has not complied with any such laws.
Should any person seek to apply any state takeover law,
Purchaser will take such action as then appears desirable, which
may include challenging the validity or applicability of any
such statute in appropriate court proceedings. In the event it
is asserted that one or more state takeover laws is applicable
to the Offer or the Merger, and an appropriate court does not
determine that it is inapplicable or invalid as applied to the
Offer, Purchaser might be required to file certain information
with, or receive approvals from, the relevant state authorities.
In addition, if enjoined, Purchaser might be unable to accept
for payment any Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer, or be
delayed in continuing or consummating the Offer, and the Merger.
In such case, Purchaser may not be obligated to accept for
payment any Shares tendered. See Section 14.
Antitrust. Under the HSR Act and the rules
that have been promulgated thereunder by the Federal Trade
Commission (“FTC”), certain acquisition transactions
may not be consummated unless certain information has been
furnished to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice
(“Antitrust Division”) and the FTC and certain waiting
period requirements have been satisfied. The acquisition of
Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer is subject to such
requirements. See Section 2.
Pursuant to the HSR Act, Parent will file a Premerger
Notification and Report Form in connection with the purchase of
Shares pursuant to the Offer with the Antitrust Division and the
FTC. Under the provisions of the HSR Act applicable to the
Offer, the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer may not be
consummated until the expiration or earlier termination of a
15-calendar day waiting period following the filing by Parent.
Since Purchaser has not yet filed its Premerger Notification and
Report Form, Purchaser does not yet know when the waiting period
under the HSR Act applicable to the purchase of Shares pursuant
to the Offer will expire. Pursuant to the HSR Act, Parent
intends to request early termination of the waiting period
applicable to the Offer. There can be no assurance, however,
that the
15-day HSR
Act waiting period will be terminated early. If either the FTC
or the Antitrust Division were to request additional information
or documentary material from Parent with respect to the Offer,
the waiting period with respect to the Offer would expire at
11:59 p.m., New York City time, on the tenth calendar day
after the date of substantial compliance with such request. If
the acquisition of Shares is delayed pursuant to a request by
the FTC or the Antitrust Division for additional information or
documentary material pursuant to the
36
HSR Act, the Offer shall be extended and, in any event, the
purchase of and payment for Shares will be deferred until
10 days after the request is substantially complied with,
unless the waiting period is sooner terminated by the FTC and
the Antitrust Division. Only one extension of such waiting
period pursuant to a request for additional information is
authorized by the HSR Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.
Any such extension of the waiting period will not give rise to
any withdrawal rights not otherwise provided for by applicable
law. See Section 4. It is a condition to the Offer that the
waiting period applicable under the HSR Act to the Offer expire
or be terminated. See Section 1 and Section 14.
The FTC and the Antitrust Division frequently scrutinize the
legality under the antitrust laws of transactions such as the
proposed acquisition of Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the
Offer. At any time before or after the purchase of Shares
pursuant to the Offer by Purchaser, the FTC or the Antitrust
Division could take such action under the antitrust laws as it
deems necessary or desirable in the public interest, including
seeking to enjoin the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer
or seeking the divestiture of Shares purchased by Purchaser or
the divestiture of substantial assets of Parent, the Company or
their respective subsidiaries. Private parties and state
attorneys general may also bring legal action under federal or
state antitrust laws under certain circumstances. Based upon an
examination of information available to Parent relating to the
businesses in which Parent, the Company and their respective
subsidiaries are engaged, Parent and Purchaser believe that the
Offer will not violate the antitrust laws. Nevertheless, there
can be no assurance that a challenge to the Offer on antitrust
grounds will not be made or, if such a challenge is made, what
the result would be. See Section 14 for certain conditions
to the Offer, including conditions with respect to litigation.
Non-US regulatory approvals. Based on publicly
available information concerning the Company, Parent has
determined that pre-merger filings may be required in certain
other jurisdictions, including, without limitation, the
People’s Republic of China, the Federal Republic of
Germany, the Republic of Hungary, and the Republic of Korea, and
intends to make any necessary filings promptly after the date of
this Offer to Purchase. Upon notification, the respective
competition authorities’ initial review of the Offer is
typically complete within the following time periods: the
People’s Republic of China — 30 working days; the
Federal Republic of Germany — one month; and the
Republic of Hungary — 45 days. For the Republic of
Korea, which has a post-closing waiting period, the review
period is 30 days. However, there can be no assurance that
non-US regulatory authorities may not extend the initial review
period, or challenge the Offer. If such a challenge is made,
there can be no assurance as to what the result would be.
Except as set forth below, Purchaser will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer or other person for soliciting
tenders of Shares pursuant to the Offer.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (“Morgan
Stanley”) is acting as Dealer Manager in connection with
the Offer and has provided certain financial advisory services
to Parent in connection with the acquisition of the Company.
Parent has agreed to pay Morgan Stanley reasonable and customary
compensation for its services as financial advisor in connection
with the Offer (including the services of Morgan Stanley as
Dealer Manager). Parent has also agreed to reimburse Morgan
Stanley for the expenses incurred by Morgan Stanley, including
the fees and expenses of legal counsel, and to indemnify Morgan
Stanley against certain liabilities and expenses in connection
with its engagement, including certain liabilities under the
federal securities laws.
Purchaser and Parent have retained Innisfree M&A
Incorporated, as the Information Agent, and Mellon Investor
Services LLC, as the Depositary, in connection with the Offer.
The Information Agent may contact holders of Shares by mail,
telephone, telex, telecopy, telegraph and personal interview and
may request banks, brokers, dealers and other nominee
stockholders to forward materials relating to the Offer to
beneficial owners. As compensation for acting as Information
Agent in connection with the Offer, Innisfree M&A
Incorporated will be paid reasonable and customary compensation
for its services and will also be reimbursed for certain
out-of-pocket expenses and may be indemnified against certain
liabilities and expenses in connection with the Offer, including
certain liabilities under the federal securities laws.
Purchaser will pay the Depositary reasonable and customary
compensation for its services in connection with the Offer, plus
reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, and will indemnify the
Depositary against certain
37
liabilities and expenses in connection therewith, including
under federal securities laws. Brokers, dealers, commercial
banks and trust companies will be reimbursed by Purchaser for
customary handling and mailing expenses incurred by them in
forwarding material to their customers.
The Offer is being made solely by this Offer to Purchase and the
related Letter of Transmittal and is being made to holders of
Shares. The Offer is not being made to (nor will tenders be
accepted from or on behalf of) holders of Shares in any
jurisdiction in which the making of the Offer or the acceptance
thereof would not be in compliance with the securities, blue sky
or other laws of such jurisdiction. In any jurisdiction where
the securities, blue sky or other laws require the Offer to be
made by a licensed broker or dealer, the Offer shall be deemed
to be made on behalf of Purchaser by the Dealer Manager or by
one or more registered brokers or dealers licensed under the
laws of such jurisdiction.
NO PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR MAKE
ANY REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF PARENT, PURCHASER OR THE COMPANY
NOT CONTAINED IN THIS OFFER TO PURCHASE OR IN THE LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL, AND IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR
REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN
AUTHORIZED.
Pursuant to
Rule 14d-3
of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act,
Parent and Purchaser have filed with the Commission the
Schedule TO, together with exhibits, furnishing certain
additional information with respect to the Offer. The
Schedule TO and any amendments thereto, including exhibits,
may be inspected at, and copies may be obtained from, the same
places and in the same manner as set forth in Section 7.
SOPHIA ACQUISITION CORP.
Dated: December 18, 2007
38
INFORMATION
CONCERNING THE DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF PARENT AND PURCHASER
|
|
|
1.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of Parent.
|
Supervisory
Board
The following table sets forth the name, current business
address, citizenship and current principal occupation or
employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or
employments and business addresses thereof for the past five
years of each member of the Supervisory Board of Parent. The
current business address of each person is 39, Chemin du
Champ-des-Filles, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland.
Unless otherwise indicated, each occupation set forth opposite
an individual’s name refers to employment with Parent.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Gérald Arbola
|
|
Mr. Arbola, a French citizen, was appointed to the
Supervisory Board at the 2004 annual shareholders’ meeting
and was reelected at the 2005 annual shareholders’ meeting.
Mr. Arbola was appointed the Chairman of the Supervisory
Board on March 18, 2005. Mr. Arbola previously served
as Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Board from April 23,
2004 until March 18, 2005. Mr. Arbola is also Chairman
of the Supervisory Board’s Compensation Committee and
Strategic Committee, and serves on its Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee. Mr. Arbola is now Managing Director
of Areva S.A., where he had also served as Chief Financial
Officer, and is a member of the Executive Board of Areva since
his appointment on July 3, 2001. Mr. Arbola is
currently a member of the boards of directors of AREVA NC, AREVA
NP, and Areva T&D Holdings. Mr. Arbola is a graduate
of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris and holds an
advanced degree in economics.
|
|
Bruno Steve
|
|
Mr. Steve, an Italian citizen, has been a member of the
Supervisory Board since 1989 and was appointed Vice Chairman of
the Supervisory Board on March 18, 2005. He previously
served as Chairman of the Supervisory Board from March 27,
2002 through March 18, 2005, from July 1990 through March
1993, and from June 1996 until May 1999. He also served as Vice
Chairman of the Supervisory Board from 1989 to July 1990 and
from May 1999 through March 2002. Mr. Steve serves on the
Supervisory Board’s Compensation Committee as well as on
its Nominating and Corporate Governance and Strategic
Committees. He was with Istituto per la Ricostruzione
Industriale-IRI S.p.A. (“IRI”), a former shareholder
of Finmeccanica, Finmeccanica and other affiliates of I.R.I. in
various senior positions for over 17 years. Mr. Steve
is currently Chairman of Statutory Auditors of Selex S. &
A. S. S.p.A., Chairman of Surveillance Body of
Selex S. & A. S. S.p.A. and member of
Statutory Auditors of Pirelli Tyres S.p.A. He is also a
professor at LUISS Guido Carli University in Rome.
|
|
Matteo del Fante
|
|
Mr. del Fante, an Italian citizen, was appointed to the
Supervisory Board at the 2005 annual shareholders’ meeting.
Mr. del Fante is also a non-voting observer on its Audit
Committee. Mr. del Fante has served as the Chief Financial
Officer of CDP in Rome since the end of 2003. Prior to joining
CDP, Mr. del Fante held several positions at JPMorgan Chase in
London, England, where he became Managing Director in 1999.
During his 13 years with JPMorgan Chase, Mr. del Fante
worked with large European clients on strategic and financial
operations. Mr. del Fante obtained his degree in Economics and
Finance from Università Bocconi in Milan in 1992, and
followed graduate specialization courses at New York
University’s Stern Business School.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Tom de Waard
|
|
Mr. Waard, a citizen of the Netherlands, has been a member
of the Supervisory Board since 1998. Mr. de Waard was appointed
Chairman of the Audit Committee by the Supervisory Board in 1999
and Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee in 2004 and 2005, respectively. He also serves on the
Supervisory Board’s Compensation Committee. Mr. de Waard
has been a partner of Clifford Chance, a leading international
law firm, since March 2000 and was the Managing Partner of
Clifford Chance Amsterdam office from May 1, 2002 until
May 1, 2005. From January 1, 2005 to January 1,
2007 he was a member of the Management Committee of Clifford
Chance. Prior to joining Clifford Chance, he was a partner at
Stibbe, where he held several positions since 1971 and gained
extensive experience working with major international companies,
particularly with respect to corporate finance. He is a member
of the Amsterdam bar and was President of the Netherlands Bar
Association from 1993 through 1995. He received his law degree
from Leiden University in 1971. Mr. de Waard is a member of the
Supervisory Board of BE Semiconductor Industries N.V.
(“BESI”) and of its audit and nominating committees.
He is also chairman of BESI’s compensation committee. Mr.
de Waard is a member of the board of the foundation
“Stichting Sport en Zaken”.
|
|
Douglas Dunn
|
|
Mr. Dunn, a U.K. citizen, has been a member of the
Supervisory Board since 2001. He is a member of its Audit
Committee since such date. He was formerly President and Chief
Executive Officer of ASML Holding N.V. (“ASML”), an
equipment supplier in the semiconductor industry, a position
from which he retired effective October 1, 2004.
Mr. Dunn was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors
of ARM Holdings plc (United Kingdom) in October 2006. In 2005,
Mr. Dunn was appointed to the boards of Philips-LG LCD
(Korea) and TomTom N.V. (Netherlands), and also serves as a
non-executive director on the board of SOITEC (France). He is
also a member of the audit committees of ARM Holdings plc,
SOITEC and TomTom N.V. In 2005, Mr. Dunn resigned from his
position as a non-executive director on the board of Sendo plc
(United Kingdom). Mr. Dunn was a member of the Managing
Board of Royal Philips Electronics in 1998. From 1996 to 1998 he
was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Philips Consumer
Electronics and from 1993 to 1996 Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Philips Semiconductors (now NXP Semiconductors). From
1980 to 1993 he held various positions at Plessey Semiconductors.
|
|
Didier Lamouche
|
|
Mr. Lamouche, a French citizen, has been a member of the
Supervisory Board since 2006. Mr. Lamouche is currently a
non-voting observer on the Audit Committee of the Supervisory
Board. Dr. Lamouche is a graduate of Ecole Centrale de Lyon
and holds a PhD in semiconductor technology. He has
25 years experience in the semiconductor industry.
Dr. Lamouche started his career in 1984 in the R&D
department of Philips before joining IBM Microelectronics where
he held several positions in France and the United States. In
1995, he became Director of Operations of Motorola’s
Advanced Power IC unit in Toulouse (France). Three years later,
in 1998, he joined IBM as General Manager of the largest
European semiconductor site in Corbeil (France) to lead its
turnaround and transformation into a joint venture between IBM
and Infineon: Altis Semiconductor. He managed Altis
Semiconductor as CEO for four years. In 2003, Dr. Lamouche
rejoined IBM and was the Vice President for Worldwide
Semiconductor Operations based in New York (United States) until
the end of 2004. Since December 2004, Dr. Lamouche has been
the Chairman and CEO of Groupe Bull, a France-based global
company operating in the IT sector. He is also a member of the
Board of Directors of CAMECA and SOITEC.
|
2
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Didier Lombard
|
|
Mr. Lombard, a French citizen, was first appointed to the
Supervisory Board at the 2004 annual shareholders’ meeting
and was reelected at the 2005 annual shareholders’ meeting.
He serves on the Compensation and Strategic Committees of the
Supervisory Board. Mr. Lombard was appointed Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of France Telecom in March 2005.
Mr. Lombard began his career in the Research and
Development division of France Telecom in 1967. From 1989 to
1990, he served as scientific and technological director at the
Ministry of Research and Technology. From 1991 to 1998, he
served as General Director for industrial strategies at the
French Ministry of Economy, Finances and Industry, and from 1999
to 2003 he served as Ambassador at large for foreign investments
in France and as President of the French Agency for
International Investments. From 2003 through February 2005, he
served as France Telecom’s Senior Executive Vice President
in charge of technologies, strategic partnerships and new usages
and as a member of France Telecom’s Executive Committee.
Mr. Lombard also spent several years as Ambassador in
charge of foreign investment in France. Mr. Lombard is also
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Orange and a member of the
Board of Directors of Thales and Thomson, as well as a member of
the Supervisory Board of Radiall. Mr. Lombard is a graduate
of the Ecole Polytechnique and the Ecole Nationale
Supérieure des Télécommunications.
|
|
Raymond Bingham
|
|
Mr. Bingham, a U.S. citizen, was appointed to the
Supervisory Board at the 2007 annual shareholders’ meeting
and serves on the Audit Committee. Since November, 2006,
Mr. Bingham has been a Managing Director of General
Atlantic LLC, a global private equity firm. From August 2005 to
October 2006, Mr. Bingham was a private investor.
Mr. Bingham was Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Cadence Design Systems Inc., a supplier of
electronic design automation software and services, from May
2004 to July 2005, and served as a director of Cadence from
November 1997 to July 2005. Prior to being Executive Chairman,
he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cadence
from April 1999 to May 2004, and as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer from April 1993 to April 1999.
Mr. Bingham also serves as a Director of Oracle
Corporation, Flextronics International, Ltd., and KLA-Tencor
Corporation.
|
|
Alessandro Ovi
|
|
Mr. Ovi, an Italian citizen, was appointed to the
Supervisory Board at the 2007 annual shareholders’ meeting,
and serves on the Strategic Committee. Previously, he was a
member of the Supervisory Board from 1994 until his term expired
at our annual general shareholders’ meeting on
March 18, 2005. He has been Special Advisor to the
President of the European Community for five years. Mr. Ovi
received a doctoral degree in Nuclear Engineering from the
Politecnico in Milan and a Master’s Degree in Operations
Research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has
served on the boards of Telecom Italia S.p.A, Finmeccanica SpA,
and Alitalia SpA. Until April 2000, Mr. Ovi was the Chief
Executive Officer of Tecnitel S.p.A., a subsidiary of Telecom
Italia Group. Prior to joining Tecnitel S.p.A., Mr. Ovi was
the Senior Vice President of International Affairs and
Communications at I.R.I.
|
3
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth the name, current business
address, citizenship and current principal occupation or
employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or
employments and business addresses thereof for the past five
years of each Executive Officer of Parent. The current business
address of each person is 39, Chemin du Champ-des-Filles, 1228
Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland. Unless otherwise
indicated, each occupation set forth opposite an
individual’s name refers to employment with Parent.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Carlo Bozotti
|
|
Carlo Bozotti, an Italian citizen, is our President, Chief
Executive Officer and the sole member of our Managing Board. As
CEO, Mr. Bozotti chairs our Executive Committee. Prior to
taking on this new role at the 2005 annual shareholders’
meeting, Mr. Bozotti served as Corporate Vice President,
MPG since August 1998. Mr. Bozotti joined SGS
Microelettronica in 1977 after graduating in Electronic
Engineering from the University of Pavia. Mr. Bozotti
served as Product Manager for the Industrial, Automotive and
Telecom products in the Linear Division and as Business Unit
Manager for the Monolithic Microsystems Division from 1987 to
1988. He was appointed Director of Corporate Strategic Marketing
and Key Accounts for the Headquarters Region in 1988 and became
Vice President, Marketing and Sales, Americas Region in 1991.
Mr. Bozotti served as Corporate Vice President, MPG from
August 1998 through March 2005, after having served as Corporate
Vice President, Europe and Headquarters Region from 1994 to 1998.
|
|
Alain Dutheil
|
|
Alain Dutheil, a French citizen, was appointed Chief Operating
Officer in 2005, with the endorsement of the Supervisory Board.
He is also the Vice Chairman of our Corporate Executive
Committee. Prior to his appointment as COO, he served as
Corporate Vice President, Strategic Planning and Human Resources
from 1994 and 1992, respectively. After graduating in Electrical
Engineering from the Ecole Supérieure
d’Ingénieurs de Marseille (“ESIM”),
Mr. Dutheil joined Texas Instruments in 1969 as a
Production Engineer, becoming Director for Discrete Products in
France and Human Resources Director in France in 1980 and
Director of Operations for Portugal in 1982. He joined Thomson
Semiconductors in 1983 as General Manager of a plant in
Aix-en-Provence, France and then became General Manager of
SGS-Thomson Discrete Products Division. From 1989 to 1994,
Mr. Dutheil served as Director for Worldwide Back-end
Manufacturing, in addition to serving as Corporate Vice
President for Human Resources from 1992 until 2005.
|
|
Laurent Bosson
|
|
Laurent Bosson, a French citizen, is currently Executive Vice
President of Front-End Technology and Manufacturing. He is also
a member of our Corporate Executive Committee. He served as
Corporate Vice President, Front-end Manufacturing and VLSI Fabs
from 1989 to 2004 and from 1992 to 1996 he was given additional
responsibility as President and Chief Executive Officer of our
operations in the Americas. Mr. Bosson remains Chairman of
the Board of STMicroelectronics Inc., our affiliate in the
United States. Mr. Bosson received a masters’ degree
in Chemistry from the University of Dijon in 1969. He joined
Thomson-CSF in 1964 and has held several positions in
engineering and manufacturing. In 1982, Mr. Bosson was
appointed General Manager of the Tours and Alençon
facilities of Thomson Semiconducteurs. In 1985, he joined the
French subsidiary of SGS Microelettronica as General Manager of
the Rennes, France manufacturing facility.
|
4
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Andrea Cuomo
|
|
Andrea Cuomo, an Italian citizen, is currently Executive Vice
President for the Advanced System Technology Group and Chief
Strategy Officer. Mr. Cuomo is also a member of our
Corporate Executive Committee. After studying at Milano
Politecnico in Nuclear Sciences, with a special focus on analog
electronics, Mr. Cuomo joined us in 1983 as a System
Testing Engineer, and from 1985 to 1989 held various positions
to become Marketing Manager in the automotive, computer and
industrial product segment. In 1989, Mr. Cuomo was
appointed Director of Strategy and Market Development for the
Dedicated Products Group, and in 1994 became Vice President
responsible for Marketing and Strategic Accounts within the
Headquarters Region. In 1998, Mr. Cuomo was appointed as
Vice President responsible for Advanced System Technology and in
2002, Mr. Cuomo was appointed as Corporate Vice President
and Advanced System Technology General Manager. In 2004, he was
given the additional responsibility of serving as our Director
of Strategic Planning and was promoted to Executive Vice
President.
|
|
Carlo Ferro
|
|
Carlo Ferro, an Italian citizen, is Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer. He is also a member of our Executive
Committee. Mr. Ferro has served as our CFO since May 2003.
Mr. Ferro graduated with a degree in Business and Economics
from the LUISS Guido Carli University in Rome, Italy in 1984,
and has a professional qualification as a Certified Public
Accountant. From 1984 through 1996, Mr. Ferro held a series
of positions in finance and control at Istituto per la
Ricostruzione Industriale-IRI S.p.A. (“IRI”), and
Finmeccanica. Mr. Ferro served as one of our Supervisory
Board Controllers from 1992 to 1996. Mr. Ferro was also a
part-time university professor of Planning and Control until
1996. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Ferro held positions at EBPA
NV, a process control company listed on the NYSE, rising to Vice
President Planning and Control and principal financial officer.
Mr. Ferro joined us in June 1999 as Group Vice President
Corporate Finance, overseeing finance and accounting for all
affiliates worldwide, and served as Deputy CFO from April 2002
through April 2003. Mr. Ferro has been designated by us to
serve as the statutory auditor for DNP Europe Srl, one of our
joint venture partners.
|
|
Philippe Geyres
|
|
Philippe Geyres, a French citizen, served as our Executive Vice
President for HPC until the end of 2006. He also served on our
Executive Committee. He served as Corporate Vice President and
General Manager of our former Consumer and Microcontroller Group
(formerly Programmable Products Group) from 1990 until 2004.
Mr. Geyres graduated from the École Polytechnique in
1973 and began his career with IBM in France before joining
Schlumberger Group in 1980 as Data Processing Director. He was
subsequently appointed Deputy Director of the IC Division at
Fairchild Semiconductors. Mr. Geyres joined Thomson
Semiconducteurs in 1983 as Director of the Bipolar Integrated
Circuits Division. He was appointed Strategic Programs Director
in 1987 and, later the same year, became our Corporate Vice
President, Strategic Planning until 1990.
|
5
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Carmelo Papa
|
|
Carmelo Papa, an Italian citizen, is our Executive Vice
President and General Manager of our Industrial &
Multisegment Sector. He is also a member of our Corporate
Executive Committee. He received his degree in Nuclear Physics
at Catania University. Mr. Papa joined us in 1983 and in
1986 was appointed Director of Product Marketing and Customer
Service for Transistors and Standard ICs. In 2000, Mr. Papa
was appointed Corporate Vice President, Emerging Markets and in
2001, he took on additional worldwide responsibility for our
Electronic Manufacturing Service to drive forward this new
important channel of business. From January 2003 through
December 2004, he was in charge of formulating and leading our
strategy to expand our customer base by providing dedicated
solutions to a broader selection of customers, one of our key
growth areas. In 2005, he was named Corporate Vice President,
MPA.
|
|
Tommi Uhari
|
|
Tommi Uhari, a Finnish citizen, was promoted to Executive Vice
President and General Manager of the Mobile,
Multimedia & Communications Group in January 2007.
Mr. Uhari is also a member of our Executive Committee.
After graduating from the University of Oulu with a
Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering and Management,
Mr. Uhari worked at Nokia in various R&D and
management positions. He started as a design engineer, working
on digital ASICs for mobile phones. In 2004, he was promoted
Vice President, Head of Wireless platforms. Mr. Uhari
joined our Company in 2006 as the Manager of the Personal
Multimedia Group.
|
|
Enrico Villa
|
|
Enrico Villa, an Italian citizen, is currently Executive Vice
President, Europe Region. He also serves on our Executive
Committee, representing the sales and marketing functions. He
was appointed Corporate Vice President, Europe Region on
January 1, 2000, after having served as Corporate Vice
President, Region 5 (now Emerging Markets) from January 1998
through 2000. Mr. Villa has served in various capacities
within our management since 1967 after obtaining a degree in
Business Administration from the University of Milan and has
40 years of experience in the semiconductor industry. He is
currently President of the European Electronics Components
Association (“EECA”) as well as Chairman for Europe at
the Joint Steering Committee of the World Semiconductor Council.
|
|
Georges Auguste
|
|
Georges Auguste, a French citizen, has served as Corporate Vice
President, Total Quality and Environmental Management since
1999. Mr. Auguste received a degree in Engineering from the
Ecole Supérieure d’Electricité
(“SUPELEC”) in 1974 and a diploma in Business
Administration from Caen University in 1976. Prior to joining
us, Mr. Auguste worked with Philips Components from 1974 to
1986, in various positions in the field of manufacturing. From
1990 to 1997, he headed our operations in Morocco, and from 1997
to 1999, Mr. Auguste served as Director of Total Quality
and Environmental Management.
|
|
Gian Luca Bertino
|
|
Gian Luca Bertino, an Italian citizen, graduated in 1985 in
Electronic Engineering from the Polytechnic of Turin. From 1986
to 1997 he held several positions within the Research and
Development organization of Olivetti’s semiconductor group
before joining ST in 1997. He was Group Vice President,
Peripherals, General Manager of our Data Storage Division within
the Telecommunications, Peripherals and Automotive (TPA) Groups,
until he was appointed Corporate Vice President, CPG.
|
6
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Ugo Carena
|
|
Ugo Carena, an Italian citizen, graduated in Mechanical
Engineering from the Polytechnic of Turin in 1970. His
semiconductor career began in 1977 within Olivetti’s
semiconductor group. He joined ST in 1997 and he held the
position of Telecommunications, Peripherals and Automotive (TPA)
Groups Vice President, General Manager Computer Peripherals and
Industrial Group, until he was named Corporate Vice President,
APG in 2005.
|
|
Marco Luciano Cassis
|
|
Marco Luciano Cassis, an Italian citizen, graduated from the
Polytechnic of Milan with a degree in Electronic Engineering.
Cassis joined us in 1988 as a mixed-signal analog designer for
car radio applications. In 1993, Cassis moved to Japan to
support our newly created design center with his expertise in
audio products. Then in 2000, Cassis took charge of the Audio
Business Unit and a year later he was promoted to Director of
Audio and Automotive Group, responsible for design, marketing,
sales, application support, and customer services. In 2004,
Cassis was named Vice President of Marketing for the automotive,
computer peripheral, and telecom products. In 2005, he advanced
to Vice President APG and joined the Board of the Japanese
subsidiary, STMicroelectronics K.K. Mr. Cassis was
appointed Corporate Vice President, Japan region on
September 6, 2005.
|
|
Patrice Chastagner
|
|
Patrice Chastagner, a French citizen, is a graduate of the HEC
business school in France and in 1988 became the Grenoble Site
Director, guiding the emergence of this facility to become one
of the most important hubs in Europe for advanced, complex
silicon chip development and solutions. As Human Resources
Manager for the Telecommunications, Peripherals and Automotive
(TPA) Groups, which was our largest product group at the time,
he was also TQM Champion and applied the principle of continuous
improvement to human resources as well as to manufacturing
processes. Since March 2003, he has also been serving as
Chairman of STMicroelectronics S.A. in France. Upon his
promotion to Corporate Vice President, Human Resources in
January 2005, he took the leadership of a group with about
50,000 people.
|
|
Claude Dardanne
|
|
Claude Dardanne, a French citizen, was promoted to Corporate
Vice President and General Manager of our newly created
Microcontrollers, Memories & Smartcards (MMS) Group,
part of our Industrial & Multisegment Sector, in
January 2007. Mr. Dardanne graduated from the Ecole
Supérieure d’Ingénieurs en Génie Electrique
de Rouen in France with a Master’s degree in Electronic
Engineering. After graduation, Mr. Dardanne spent five
years at Thomson Semiconducteurs in France before moving to
North America as a Field Application Engineer. From 1982,
Mr. Dardanne was responsible for marketing of
Microcontrollers & Microprocessor products in North
America and, in 1987, Mr. Dardanne was appointed
Thomson’s Worldwide Marketing Manager for
Microcontrollers & Microprocessors in France. In 1989,
Mr. Dardanne joined Apple Computer, France, as Marketing
Director, responsible for business development in segments
including Industrial, Education, Banking and Communications.
From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Dardanne served as Marketing
Director at Alcatel-Mietec in Belgium and in 1994,
Mr. Dardanne rejoined Thomson (which by then had merged
with SGS Microelettronica) as Director of Central Marketing for
the Memory Products Group (MPG). In 1998, Mr. Dardanne
became the head of the EEPROM division. In 2002,
Mr. Dardanne was promoted to Vice President of the Memory
Products Group and General Manager of the Serial Non-Volatile
Memories division and in 2004, he was promoted to Deputy General
Manager, Memory Products Group, where his responsibilities
included the management of our Smart Card Division.
|
7
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
François Guibert
|
|
François Guibert, a French citizen, was born in Beziers,
France in 1953 and graduated from the Ecole Supérieure
d’Ingénieurs de Marseilles in 1978. After three years
at Texas Instruments, he joined Thomson Semiconducteurs in 1981
as Sales Manager Telecom. From 1983 to 1986, he was responsible
for ICs and strategic marketing of telecom products in North
America. In 1988 he was appointed Director of our Semicustom
Business for Asia Pacific and in 1989 he became President of
ST-Taiwan. Since 1992 he has occupied senior positions in
Business Development and Investor Relations and was Group Vice
President, Corporate Business Development which includes
M&A activities from 1995 to the end of 2004. In January
2005, Mr. Guibert was promoted to the position of Corporate
Vice President, Emerging Markets Region and in October 2006, he
was appointed Corporate Vice President, Asia Pacific Region.
|
|
Reza Kazerounian
|
|
Reza Kazerounian, a U.S. citizen, is a graduate of the
University of Illinois and received his PhD from the University
of California, Berkeley in electrical engineering and computer
sciences. In 1985, Mr. Kazerounian started his professional
career as a research and development engineer at WaferScale
Integration (WSI), specializing in Programmable System Devices.
At WSI, he became Vice President of Technology and Product
Development (1995) and later Chief Operating Officer in
1997. When we acquired WSI in 2000, Mr. Kazerounian became
the general manager of the newly formed Programmable Systems
Division, charged with the development of 8- and 32-bit embedded
systems. In 2003, he was appointed Group Vice President and
General Manager of the Smart Card IC Division. Reza Kazerounian
was appointed Corporate Vice President for the North America
Region on September 6, 2005.
|
|
Otto Kosgalwies
|
|
Otto Kosgalwies, a German citizen, was appointed Corporate Vice
President, Infrastructure and Services in November 2004, with
responsibility for all of our corporate activities related to
Information Technology, Logistics, and Procurement and Material
Management, with particular emphasis on the complete supply
chain between customer demand, manufacturing execution,
inventory management, and supplier relations.
Mr. Kosgalwies has been with us since 1984 after graduating
with a degree in Economics from Munich University. From 1992
through 1995, he served as European Manager for Distribution,
from 1995 to 2000 as Sales and Distribution Director for Central
Europe, and since 1997 as CEO of our German subsidiary. In 2000,
Mr. Kosgalwies was appointed Vice President for Sales and
Marketing in Europe and General Manager for Supply Chain
Management, where he was responsible at a corporate level for
the effective flow of goods and information from suppliers to
end users.
|
|
Robert Krysiak
|
|
Robert Krysiak, a U.K. citizen, graduated from Cardiff
University with a degree in Electronics and holds an MBA from
the University of Bath. In 1983, Mr. Krysiak joined INMOS,
as a VLSI Design Engineer. Then in 1992, Mr. Krysiak formed
a group dedicated to the development of CPU products based on
the Reusable-Micro-Core architecture. Mr. Krysiak was
appointed Group Vice President and General Manager of our
16/32/64 and DSP division in 1997. In 1999, Mr. Krysiak
became Group Vice President of the Micro Cores Development, and
in 2001, he took charge of our DVD division. Mr. Krysiak
was appointed on October 17, 2005 as Corporate Vice
President and General Manager of our Greater China region, which
focuses exclusively on our operations in China, Hong Kong and
Taiwan. Before that, Mr. Krysiak was Marketing Director for
HPC..
|
8
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Mario Licciardello
|
|
Mario Licciardello, an Italian citizen, was born in Catania,
Italy, on January 28, 1942. He graduated in Physics from
the University of Catania in 1964. Mr. Licciardello has
spent his entire career within companies that have evolved into
the current STMicroelectronics. In 1965 he joined ATES, a
predecessor of ST, initially in process development, then in
strategic planning, after one year spent at the Catania
University engaged in various research programs. In 1970, he
joined the MOS field where he spent a large part of his
professional career in various positions ranging from Operations
Manager to Business Unit Manager contributing to the success in
the market of several product lines. From 1986 to 1990 he
covered the role of Director of Marketing and Business
Management for the Semicustom Product Division (named IST). The
position included the worldwide responsibility for the external
design centers network. From 1990 to 1993, as Director of
Corporate Strategic Planning with the relevant Corporate Central
Organization, his responsibility ranged from Capital Investment
Control to shareholder relations. He moved to MPG in 1993 and in
2003 was promoted from General Manager of our Flash Memories
Division to Deputy General Manager of MPG. In 2005, he was named
Corporate Vice President and General Manager of MPG.
|
|
Jean-Claude Marquet
|
|
Jean-Claude Marquet, a French citizen, has served as Corporate
Vice President, Asia Pacific Region since July 1995. After
graduating in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from ESIEE
Paris, Mr. Marquet began his career in the French National
Research Organization and later joined Alcatel. In 1969, he
joined Philips Components. He remained at Philips until 1978,
when he joined Ericsson, eventually becoming President of
Ericsson Components’ French operations. In 1985,
Mr. Marquet joined Thomson Semiconducteurs as Vice
President Sales and Marketing, France. Thereafter,
Mr. Marquet served as Vice President Sales and Marketing
for France and Benelux, and Vice President Asia Pacific and
Director of Sales and Marketing for the region.
|
|
Carlo Emanuele Ottaviani
|
|
Carlo Emanuele Ottaviani, an Italian citizen, was named
Corporate Vice President, Communications in March 2003. He began
his career in 1965 in the Advertisement and Public Relations
Office of SIT-SIEMENS, today known as ITALTEL. He later had
responsibility for the activities of the associated
semiconductor company ATES Electronic Components. ATES merged
with the Milan-based SGS in 1971, and Mr. Ottaviani was in
charge of the advertisement and marketing services of the newly
formed SGS-ATES. In 1975, he was appointed Head of Corporate
Communication worldwide, and has held this position since that
time. In 2001, Mr. Ottaviani was also appointed President
of STMicroelectronics Foundation.
|
|
Jeffrey See
|
|
Jeffrey See, a Singapore citizen, was appointed Corporate Vice
President, Central Back-end General Manager in April 2006. After
Mr. See graduated from the Singapore Polytechnic in 1965,
he became a Chartered Electronic Engineer at the Institution of
Electrical Engineers (IEE) in the UK. In 1969, Mr. See
joined SGS Microelettronica, a forerunner company of ST, as a
Quality Supervisor at its first Assembly and Test facility in
Toa Payoh, Singapore and was promoted to Deputy Back-End Plant
Manager in 1980. In 1983, Mr. See was appointed to manage
the start-up
of the region’s first wafer fabrication plant
(125-mm) in
Ang Mo Kio, Singapore and became General Manager of the
front-end operations in 1992. In 2001, Mr. See was
appointed Vice President and Assistant General Manager of
Central Front-End Manufacturing and General Manager of the Asia
Pacific Manufacturing Operations, responsible for wafer
fabrication and electrical wafer sort in the region.
|
9
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Giordano Seragnoli
|
|
Giordano Seragnoli, an Italian citizen, has served as Corporate
Vice President, Subsystems Products Group since 1987 and since
1994, as Director for Worldwide Back-end Manufacturing. After
graduating in Electrical Engineering from the University of
Bologna, Mr. Seragnoli joined the Thomson Group as RF
Application Designer in 1962 and joined SGS Microelettronica in
1965. Thereafter, Mr. Seragnoli served in various
capacities within our management, including Strategic Marketing
Manager and Subsystems Division Manager, Subsystems
Division Manager (Agrate), Technical Facilities Manager,
Subsystems Division Manager and Back-End Manager.
|
|
Thierry Tingaud
|
|
Thierry Tingaud, a French citizen, was promoted to Corporate
Vice President, Emerging Markets Region General Manager,
responsible for our sales and marketing operations in Africa and
the Middle East, India, Latin America, Russia and the Eastern
European countries in July 2006. Mr. Tingaud graduated from
INSA Lyon in 1982 with a Master’s degree in Electronic
Engineering and he also holds an MBA from Ecole Supérieure
des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales (ESSEC).
Mr. Tingaud joined the sales and marketing organization of
Thomson Semiconducteurs, a forerunner company of ST, in 1985.
Three years later, he took responsibility for the Company’s
telecommunications business in France. In 1996, Mr. Tingaud
moved to North America as Corporate Strategic Key Account
Director for our Headquarters Region. In this role, he
strengthened the strategic alliance with a major key account,
responsible for its operations in Europe, North America, Mexico,
and Malaysia. In 1999, Mr. Tingaud was appointed Vice
President for Sales and Marketing of Telecommunications in
Europe.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of Purchaser.
|
The following table sets forth the name, current business
address, citizenship and present principal occupation or
employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or
employments and business addresses thereof for the past five
years of each director and executive officer of Purchaser. The
current business address of each person is 39, Chemin du
Champ-des-Filles, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland.
Unless otherwise indicated, each occupation set forth opposite
an individual’s name, refers to employment with Purchaser.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Archibald Malone
|
|
Archibald Malone, a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain, is President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
of Purchaser. Mr. Malone also currently serves as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of STMicroelectronics
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. After receiving a
Higher National Diploma in Business Administration from the
Falkirk College of Business in 1967, Mr. Malone began his
career that same year with SGS Fairchild, one of the predecessor
entities to STMicroelectronics N.V. Mr. Malone has served
in his current position at STMicroelectronics Inc. since 1988
and has previously held various other business and financial
positions within Parent.
|
10
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Citizenship; Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions Held
|
|
|
|
During the Past Five Years and
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Addresses Thereof
|
|
|
|
Reza Kazerounian
|
|
Reza Kazerounian, a U.S. citizen, is the sole director of
Purchaser. Mr. Kazerounian is a graduate of the University
of Illinois and received his PhD from the University of
California, Berkeley in electrical engineering and computer
sciences. In 1985, Mr. Kazerounian started his professional
career as a research and development engineer at WaferScale
Integration (WSI), specializing in Programmable System Devices.
At WSI, he became Vice President of Technology and Product
Development (1995) and later Chief Operating Officer in
1997. When Parent acquired WSI in 2000, Mr. Kazerounian
became the general manager of the newly formed Programmable
Systems Division, charged with the development of 8- and 32-bit
embedded systems. In 2003, he was appointed Group Vice President
and General Manager of the Smart Card IC Division. Reza
Kazerounian was appointed Corporate Vice President for the North
America Region of Parent on September 6, 2005.
|
11
Manually signed facsimiles of the Letter of Transmittal,
properly completed, will be accepted. The Letter of Transmittal
and certificates evidencing Shares and any other required
documents should be sent or delivered by each stockholder or his
broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee
to the Depositary at one of its addresses set forth below.
The
Depositary for the Offer is:
Mellon
Investor Services LLC
By Facsimile
Transmission (for Eligible Institutions only):
(412) 209-6443
Confirm by Telephone:
(201) 680-4860
| |
|
|
|
|
|
By Overnight
Courier:
|
|
By Mail:
|
|
By Hand:
|
|
|
|
Mellon Investor Services LLC
|
|
Mellon Investor Services LLC
|
|
Mellon Investor Services LLC
|
|
Attn.: Corporate Actions Dept.
|
|
Attn.: Corporate Actions Dept.
|
|
Attn: Corporate Actions Dept
|
|
FL 27
|
|
P. O. Box 3301
|
|
FL 27
|
|
480 Washington Boulevard
|
|
South Hackensack, NJ 07606
|
|
480 Washington Boulevard
|
|
Jersey City, NJ 07310
|
|
|
|
Jersey City, NJ 07310
|
Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the
Information Agent or the Dealer Manager at their respective
addresses and telephone numbers listed below. Additional copies
of this Offer to Purchase, the Letter of Transmittal and the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be obtained from the
Information Agent. A stockholder may also contact brokers,
dealers, commercial banks or trust companies for assistance
concerning the Offer.
The
Information Agent for the Offer is:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Ave, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders Call Toll-Free:
(888) 750-5834
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5833
The Dealer Manager for the Offer is:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(877) 247-9865