REQUESTING AN INDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIR
The Accountability Board, Inc. has advised us that it intends to submit the following proposal for consideration at the annual meeting. We are not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal, which is presented as received from the proponent in accordance with SEC rules. As explained below, our Board recommends that you vote “AGAINST” this shareholder proposal.
RESOLVED: Shareholders ask the Board to adopt a policy, and amend the bylaws as necessary, to require any Board Chair to be independent. The policy may provide that (i) if a Chair at any time ceases to be independent, he or she shall be replaced with an independent one, (ii) compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chair, and (iii) that the policy shall apply prospectively so as not to violate any legal obligation existing at its adoption.
DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:
In 2020, a shareholder proposal at Chipotle seeking an independent Chair policy nearly passed, with 44% of the vote. It was supported by ISS, Glass Lewis, and major investors, including AllianceBernstein, Amundi, BNY Mellon, Capital Group, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Invesco, T. Rowe Price, and UBS.
Despite the significant support, Chipotle continued combining the CEO and Chair positions.
So, when Brian Niccol resigned, Chipotle found itself with two empty critical positions (CEO and Chair) because of one person’s departure. Its stock dropped 7.5% when this was announced and it scrambled to adjust—resulting in an indefinite hold on the planned retirement of one executive, shifting others around, and granting tens of millions of dollars worth of restricted stock “retention awards” to keep officers from leaving.
We now ask shareholders to consider the matter of Chair independence again.
We appreciate that an independent Chair was, in fact, appointed upon Mr. Niccol’s departure. Regardless of whether that structure remains by the time this proposal is voted on, best governance practices and our company’s recent experience provide great insight into why shareholders should adopt a formal independent Chair policy going forward.
Indeed, ensuring independent leadership is important to the Board’s oversight role and decision-making involving corporate strategy, performance, succession, and other critical matters.
“The chair of the board should ideally be an independent director,” reports ISS, “to help provide appropriate counterbalance to executive management.”
And, says Glass Lewis, Chair independence can “protect shareholder interests by ensuring oversight of the Company on behalf of shareholders is led by an individual free from the insurmountable conflict of overseeing oneself.”
In fact, Chipotle’s own Corporate Governance Guidelines say the Board’s “primary responsibilities” include overseeing and monitoring senior management.
Thus, adoption of this proposal would help ensure the Board is able to fulfill its fundamental duties.
It would also ensure the CEO is able to focus on managing the business while the Chair focuses on matters of Board oversight and governance.
By contrast, continuing to allow the Board to freely combine the Chair and CEO roles as it pleases risks concentrating too much power in a single individual, leaving Chipotle vulnerable to significant disruption should a combined Chair/CEO depart (a danger that was recently highlighted in vivid detail), and inhibiting the Board’s ability to perform its primary functions overseeing management.
For all these reasons, we believe support for this proposal is warranted. Thank you.