Please wait
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
| |
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement. |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement. |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials. |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12. |
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| |
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
| |
|
|
When is the annual meeting?
|
• |
9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time, May 18, 2011 |
|
|
|
Where is the annual meeting held?
|
• |
Fort Worth Club
|
|
|
306 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor |
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas 76102 |
|
|
|
What are the items of business?
|
• |
Elect three directors, Thomas F. Darden, W. Byron Dunn and Mark
J. Warner |
|
|
|
|
• |
Advisory vote on executive compensation |
|
|
|
|
• |
Advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on
executive compensation |
|
|
|
|
• |
Transact other business as may properly come before the meeting,
and any adjournment or postponement thereof |
|
|
|
Who can vote?
|
• |
You can vote if you were a stockholder of record on March 21,
2011. Your shares can be voted at the meeting only if you are present
or represented by a valid proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend
the annual meeting, Quicksilver encourages you to vote by proxy at
your earliest convenience. |
|
|
|
How can I vote?
|
• |
Your vote is important. Please vote in one of the following ways: |
|
|
|
|
|
- By proxy — submit your instructions over the internet or by
telephone or complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed
proxy card (or if you are a participant in the Quicksilver 401(k)
Plan, the enclosed voting instruction card) in the pre-addressed,
postage-paid envelope. |
|
|
|
|
|
- In person — submit a ballot at the annual meeting on May 18, 2011.
If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, in the name of a
bank, broker or other holder of record), you must obtain a proxy from
that entity and bring it with you to hand in with your ballot, in
order to be able to vote your shares at the meeting. |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be
Held on May 18, 2011: The proxy statement and Quicksilver’s annual report to security holders are
also available for your review at www.proxydocs.com/kwk.
John C. Cirone
Senior Vice President — General Counsel
April 6, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
| NOTE: |
|
All share information included in this proxy statement has
been adjusted to reflect, as necessary, a two-for-one stock split in January 2008. |
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
PROXY STATEMENT
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
What is the purpose of this proxy statement?
The purpose of this proxy statement is to provide information regarding matters to be voted on
at the annual meeting of stockholders of Quicksilver Resources Inc. to be held on May 18, 2011.
Additionally, it contains certain information that the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
and the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, require Quicksilver to provide to its stockholders. This
proxy statement is also the document used by Quicksilver’s Board of Directors to solicit proxies to
be used at the annual meeting. Quicksilver pays the costs of soliciting proxies. Proxies are
solicited to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on the matters to be presented
at the annual meeting, even if they cannot attend the meeting.
When is the proxy statement being mailed?
This proxy statement is first being mailed to Quicksilver’s stockholders on or about April 6,
2011.
Who is entitled to vote on the matters discussed in this proxy statement?
You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record of Quicksilver common stock as of
the close of business on March 21, 2011. Your shares can be voted at the meeting only if you are
present or represented by a valid proxy. If your shares are held in street name, you must obtain a
proxy, executed in your favor, from your bank, broker or other holder of record to be able to vote
at the annual meeting.
How many votes do I have?
Each share of Quicksilver common stock that you held on March 21, 2011 entitles you to one
vote at the annual meeting. At the close of business on March 21, 2011, there were a total of
171,117,739 shares of Quicksilver common stock outstanding that are entitled to vote at the annual
meeting.
How can I vote?
You can vote in person by completing a ballot at the annual meeting, or you can vote prior to
the meeting by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, Quicksilver encourages
you to vote by proxy at your earliest convenience. You may vote by proxy over the internet, by
telephone or by mail as discussed below.
How do I vote by proxy?
If you choose to vote your shares by proxy, you have the following options:
| |
• |
|
Over the internet — you can vote over the internet at the web address shown on your
proxy card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you
vote over the internet, you should not return your proxy card. |
| |
| |
• |
|
By telephone — you can vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number on your
proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your
instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone, you should not
return your proxy card. |
| |
| |
• |
|
By mail — you can vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and mailing your
proxy card to the Secretary of Quicksilver in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope
provided. If you sign your proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares to
be voted, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board. If you mail the proxy
card, but fail to sign it your vote cannot be counted. |
How can I vote my shares held in the Quicksilver 401(k) Plan?
If you participate in the Quicksilver 401(k) Plan, you will receive a voting instruction card
that lists shares of Quicksilver common stock credited to your 401(k) Plan account as of the close
of business on March 21, 2011. To cast your vote with respect to these shares, you must instruct
The Charles Schwab Trust Company, the trustee for the 401(k) Plan, as to how to vote your shares
held in the 401(k) Plan through one of the following options:
| |
• |
|
Over the internet — you can instruct the trustee how to vote over the internet at
the web address shown on your voting instruction card. Internet voting instructions
may be submitted 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you instruct the trustee how to
vote over the internet, you should not return your voting instruction card. |
| |
| |
• |
|
By telephone — you can instruct the trustee how to vote by telephone by calling the
toll-free number on your voting instruction card. Telephone voting instructions may be
submitted 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to
instruct the trustee how to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have
been properly recorded. If you instruct the trustee how to vote by telephone, you
should not return your voting instruction card. |
| |
| |
• |
|
By mail — you can instruct the trustee how to vote by mail by completing, signing,
dating and mailing your voting instruction card to the trustee in the pre-addressed,
postage-paid envelope provided. |
To allow the trustee sufficient time to vote shares held in the 401(k) Plan, you must submit
your voting instructions by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 10, 2011. If you do not
instruct the trustee how to vote your shares held in the 401(k) Plan, those shares will be voted in
the same proportion as the shares held in the 401(k) Plan for which voting instructions are
received.
Can I change my mind after I vote?
If you vote by proxy, you can revoke that proxy at any time before it is voted at the annual
meeting. You can do this by:
| |
• |
|
giving written notice to the Secretary of Quicksilver at 801 Cherry Street, Suite
3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102; |
| |
| |
• |
|
voting again over the internet or by telephone; |
| |
| |
• |
|
signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it prior to the annual
meeting; or |
| |
| |
• |
|
attending the annual meeting in person and casting a ballot. |
What constitutes a quorum for the annual meeting?
A majority of Quicksilver common stock entitled to vote must be present, either in person or
by proxy, in order to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the annual meeting. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the
meeting. Broker non-votes are shares held by a broker or nominee that are represented at the
meeting, but with respect to which the beneficial owner of the shares has not instructed the broker
or nominee on how to vote the shares on a particular matter and with respect to which the broker or
nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter.
How many votes are required to elect the director nominees?
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes present in person or by proxy entitled to
vote, which means that the three nominees who receive the highest number of votes will be elected
as directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of the
election of directors.
How many votes are required to approve the other matters to be voted on?
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted, either in person or by proxy, at the
annual meeting is needed to approve the advisory vote on executive compensation. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of this vote.
2
The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes
cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has
been selected by stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on the
outcome of this vote.
Where else are proxy materials available?
The proxy statement and Quicksilver’s annual report to security holders are also available for
your review at www.proxydocs.com/kwk.
Where can I find directions to the annual meeting location?
Directions to the Fort Worth Club are available at www.fortworthclub.com.
3
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
The Board of Directors
At the date of this proxy statement, the Board consists of seven members, four of whom are
non-employee directors. Quicksilver’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Board will
have not less than three nor more than nine members as fixed from time-to-time by vote of a
majority of the entire Board. A majority of the entire Board previously fixed the number of
directors at seven.
The Board is currently divided into three classes with three-year terms. The terms are
staggered so that the term of one class expires at each annual meeting of Quicksilver’s
stockholders. Three director nominees, Messrs. Thomas F. Darden, W. Byron Dunn and Mark J. Warner,
have been nominated for election at the annual meeting. Messrs. Darden, Dunn and Warner are
standing for re-election to the Board by the stockholders of Quicksilver.
The age, principal occupation and certain other information for each director nominee and
other directors serving unexpired terms are set forth below. Also presented below is information
regarding each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to the conclusion that he or she should serve as a
director of Quicksilver.
Nominees for election at this meeting to a term expiring in 2014:
| |
• |
|
Thomas F. Darden, age 57, has served on the Board since December 1997 and became
Chairman of the Board in March 1999. Prior to joining Quicksilver, Mr. Darden was
employed by Mercury Exploration Company for 22 years in various executive level
positions. He has served as a director of Crestwood Gas Services GP LLC (formerly
known as Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC) since July of 2007. Crestwood Gas Services
GP LLC is the general partner of Crestwood Midstream Partners LP (formerly known as
Quicksilver Gas Services LP, “KGS”) and was a subsidiary of Quicksilver until the
closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests in KGS and Quicksilver Gas
Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010. We believe Mr. Darden’s qualifications to serve on
the Board include his strategic, operating and marketing expertise from 35 years of
experience in the oil and gas industry, his depth of knowledge of Quicksilver and his
positions with Quicksilver and Crestwood Gas Services GP LLC. |
| |
| |
• |
|
W. Byron Dunn, age 57, has served on the Board since October 2007. Mr. Dunn has
been a Principal of Tubular Synergy Group L.P., a wholesale marketer of steel tubular
products, since February 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Dunn served with Lone Star Steel
Company, a subsidiary of Lone Star Technologies, Inc., for 32 years, including as
President and Chief Executive Officer from August 1997 until retiring in June 2007. We
believe Mr. Dunn’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive executive
leadership and management experience in the oil and gas service industry, including as
Chief Executive Officer of a subsidiary of a publicly-traded company. |
| |
| |
• |
|
Mark J. Warner, age 47, has served on the Board since March 1999. Mr. Warner serves
as Managing Director of Natural Resource Investments for The University of Texas
Investment Management Company and has served in other capacities since November 2007.
Mr. Warner served as the Director of Corporate Development of PointOne, a
telecommunications company, from April 2004 to November 2007. Mr. Warner served as
Senior Vice President of Growth Capital Partners, L.P., an investment banking firm,
from 2000 to 2004 and as Director of Domestic Finance of Enron Corporation, an energy
company, from 1995 to 2000. Mr. Warner previously served as a director for Hornbeck
Offshore Services, a marine transport provider, from 1998 to 2001. We believe Mr.
Warner’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his 26 years of experience in the
oil and gas industry, his investing and transactional experience, particularly in the
energy industry, and his 11 years of experience as a director of Quicksilver. |
Directors whose terms expire in 2012:
| |
• |
|
Glenn Darden, age 55, has served on the Board since December 1997 and became our
Chief Executive Officer in December 1999. He served as Quicksilver’s Vice President
until he was elected |
4
| |
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer in March 1999. He served as a director of
Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC from March 2007 to October 2010. Prior to working for
Quicksilver, he served with Mercury Exploration Company for 18 years, the last five as
Executive Vice President. Prior to working for Mercury, Mr. Darden worked as a
geologist for Mitchell Energy Company LP (subsequently merged with Devon Energy). We
believe Mr. Darden’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his depth of knowledge
of Quicksilver, including its strategies, operations and markets, his 31 years of
experience in the oil and gas industry and his previous position with Quicksilver Gas
Services GP LLC. |
| |
• |
|
W. Yandell Rogers, III, age 48, has served on the Board since March 1999. Since
2008, Mr. Rogers has served as Chief Executive Officer of Lewiston Atlas Ltd., a
privately-owned holding company with investments in service, manufacturing and oil and
gas interests since 2008. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Priest River Ltd., a
privately-owned holding company, from 2002 to 2008. He served as Chief Executive
Officer of Ridgway’s, Inc., a provider of reprographics to the engineering and
construction industries, from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Rogers has also served as a director
of BreitBurn GP, LLC since April 2010. We believe Mr. Roger’s qualifications to serve
on the Board include his executive leadership and management experience, his depth of
knowledge of Quicksilver and 11 years of experience as a director of Quicksilver. |
Directors whose terms expire in 2013:
| |
• |
|
Anne Darden Self, age 53, has served on the Board since August 1999 and became
Quicksilver’s Vice President — Human Resources in July 2000. Ms. Self has also served
as President of Mercury Exploration Company since 2000. She served as Vice President
— Human Resources of Mercury Exploration from 1992 to 2000. We believe Ms. Self’s
qualifications to serve on the Board include her executive leadership and management
experience, her depth of knowledge of Quicksilver and 11 years of experience as a
director of Quicksilver. |
| |
| |
• |
|
Steven M. Morris, age 59, has served on the Board since March 1999. Mr. Morris is a
Certified Public Accountant and has served as President of Morris & Company, a private
investment firm, since 1992. We believe Mr. Morris’ qualifications to serve on the
Board include his experience in public accounting and his 24 years of experience in the
oil and gas industry, including 11 years as director of Quicksilver. |
Family Relationship Among Directors
Thomas F. Darden, Glenn Darden and Anne Darden Self are siblings.
Independent Directors
An important component of a strong company is an independent Board that is accountable to
Quicksilver and its stockholders. Quicksilver’s Board has been composed of a majority of
independent directors since going public in 1999. The categorical independence standards for
directors adopted by the Board appear in the Corporate Governance section of Quicksilver’s website
(www.qrinc.com/corporate_governance).
The Board determined that each of Messrs. Dunn, Morris, Rogers and Warner satisfies
Quicksilver’s categorical independence standards and further determined that each of them is
independent of Quicksilver and its management within the meaning of the NYSE’s listing standards.
Presiding Non-Management Director and Executive Sessions
Quicksilver’s non-management directors meet in executive session without management either
before or after all regularly scheduled Board meetings. In May 2010, the Board elected W. Yandell
Rogers, III as Presiding Non-Management Director, in accordance with the NYSE rules. In his
capacity as Presiding Non-Management Director, Mr. Rogers’s primary responsibility is to preside
over executive sessions of Quicksilver’s non-management directors.
5
Corporate Governance Principles, Processes and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
You may find the full texts of Quicksilver’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as the charters for the Audit Committee, Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee, in the Corporate Governance section of
Quicksilver’s website (www.qrinc.com/corporate_governance). Quicksilver intends to post any
amendments to or waivers of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics with respect to its directors
or executive officers in the Corporate Governance section of its website.
Committees of the Board
The Board has standing Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation
Committees, each of which is composed solely of independent directors. Messrs. Dunn, Morris,
Rogers and Warner serve on each of these Committees.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with applicable
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its purposes are to:
| |
• |
|
oversee management’s conduct of Quicksilver’s financial reporting process and
systems of internal accounting and financial controls to assist in the Board’s
oversight of: (i) the integrity of Quicksilver’s financial statements; (ii)
Quicksilver’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the independent
registered public accounting firm’s qualification and independence; and (iv) the
performance of Quicksilver’s internal audit function and independent registered public
accounting firm; |
| |
| |
• |
|
select, determine the compensation of, and monitor the independence and performance
of Quicksilver’s independent registered public accounting firm; |
| |
| |
• |
|
select, determine the compensation of, and monitor the performance of Quicksilver’s
Director of Internal Audit; |
| |
| |
• |
|
provide an avenue of communication among the independent registered public
accounting firm, management and the Board; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
prepare the report that the SEC rules require be included in Quicksilver’s annual
proxy statement. |
The Audit Committee met 10 times during 2010. The Board has determined that (i) each of
Messrs. Dunn, Morris, Rogers and Warner meets the additional audit committee independence criteria
specified in SEC rules and the NYSE’s listing standards; (ii) each of Messrs. Dunn, Morris, Rogers
and Warner has a basic understanding of finance and accounting and is able to read and understand
fundamental financial statements; (iii) each of Messrs. Dunn, Morris, Rogers and Warner has
accounting or related financial management expertise; and (iv) Mr. Morris, the Chair of the Audit
Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The purposes of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, also referred to as the NCG Committee, are to:
| |
• |
|
identify individuals qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with
criteria approved by the Board; |
| |
| |
• |
|
recommend director nominees for each annual meeting of Quicksilver’s stockholders; |
| |
| |
• |
|
develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines
applicable to Quicksilver; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
oversee the evaluation of the Board and management. |
6
The NCG Committee met five times during 2010. The NCG Committee recommended to the Board that
Messrs. Thomas F. Darden, W. Byron Dunn and Mark J. Warner be nominated to serve as directors for a
term ending on the date of the 2014 annual meeting.
The NCG Committee also has oversight over Quicksilver’s compliance program. The NCG Committee
has implemented a board education program designed to familiarize members of the Board with their
responsibilities.
Criteria and Procedures for Selection of Director Nominees. In considering candidates for
nomination, the NCG Committee will first determine the incumbent directors whose terms expire at
the upcoming meeting and who wish to continue their service on the Board. As to each such
incumbent director, the NCG Committee considers the director’s qualifications for Board membership
using the criteria set forth below, the performance of the director during his or her current term,
whether any special, countervailing considerations exist against re-nominating the director and
such other factors as it deems appropriate. If the NCG Committee determines that an incumbent
director consenting to re-nomination continues to be qualified and has satisfactorily performed his
or her duties as a director during the preceding term, and there exist no reasons, including
considerations relating to the composition and functional needs of the Board as a whole, why the
incumbent should not be re-nominated, the NCG Committee will, absent special circumstances, propose
the incumbent director for re-election. In the event of the resignation, retirement, removal,
death or disability of an incumbent director or a decision of the directors to expand the size of
the Board or not to re-nominate an incumbent director, the NCG Committee will identify and evaluate
potential candidates for recommendation to the Board for nomination. The NCG Committee will
solicit recommendations for candidates for nomination from the NCG Committee members, the Board,
management and other persons that the NCG Committee believes are likely to be familiar with
qualified candidates. The Committee may also determine to engage a professional search firm to
assist in identifying qualified candidates; where such a search firm is engaged, the Committee
shall determine such firm’s scope of engagement and compensation. As to each candidate that the
Committee believes merits consideration, the Committee will cause to be assembled information
concerning the background and qualifications of the candidate, including information concerning the
candidate required to be disclosed in Quicksilver’s proxy statement or other filings with the SEC
and any relationship between the candidate and the person or persons recommending the candidate.
In considering nominees for election as directors, the NCG Committee takes into consideration
the following criteria:
| |
• |
|
personal and professional qualities, characteristics, attributes, accomplishments
and reputation in the business community; |
| |
| |
• |
|
current knowledge and contacts in the communities in which Quicksilver does business
and in its industry or other industries relevant to its business; |
| |
| |
• |
|
ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters,
including service on boards of other publicly-traded companies; |
| |
| |
• |
|
skills and personality and how they fit with those of other directors and potential
directors in building a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs
of Quicksilver; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
diversity of viewpoints, background, experience and other demographics versus those
of other directors and potential directors. |
The NCG Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate,
including the current composition of the Board, the balance of management directors and independent
directors, the need for Audit Committee expertise and its evaluations of other candidates.
Stockholder Recommendations for Nomination of Directors. The NCG Committee will consider
nominees for directors recommended by stockholders of Quicksilver and will evaluate such nominees
using the same criteria used to evaluate director candidates otherwise identified by the NCG
Committee. Stockholders wishing to make such recommendations should write to the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee c/o Elizabeth K. Giddens, Secretary, Quicksilver Resources Inc., 801
Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
7
Stockholder Nomination of Directors. Any stockholder entitled to vote in the election of
directors at an annual meeting of stockholders may nominate persons for election as directors of
Quicksilver at such meeting. Any stockholder who intends to make a nomination at the annual
meeting of stockholders must deliver notice addressed to Elizabeth K. Giddens, Secretary,
Quicksilver Resources Inc., 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. The
notice should be delivered for receipt not more than 90 days and not less than 60 days prior to the
first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided that, in the
event that the date of the meeting of stockholders is more than 30 days before or after such
anniversary date, stockholder recommendations for nominees should be delivered for receipt not
later than the close of business on the 15th day following the earlier of the day the notice was
mailed or public disclosure of the meeting was made. Persons making submissions must include:
| |
• |
|
as to each nominee whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director: |
| |
– |
|
the name, age, business address and residence address of the nominee |
| |
| |
– |
|
the principal occupation or employment of the nominee |
| |
| |
– |
|
the class and number of shares of capital stock of Quicksilver which are
beneficially owned by the nominee |
| |
| |
– |
|
any other information concerning the nominee that would be required, under
the rules of the SEC, in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of
such nominee |
| |
• |
|
as to the stockholder giving the notice: |
| |
– |
|
the name and record address of the stockholder and of each beneficial owner
on behalf of which the stockholder is acting |
| |
| |
– |
|
the class and number of shares of capital stock of Quicksilver which are
beneficially owned by the stockholder and by any such beneficial owner |
| |
| |
– |
|
a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of capital
stock of Quicksilver entitled to vote at such annual meeting and intends to appear
in person or by proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the nominee for election as
a director |
| |
| |
– |
|
a description of all arrangements or understandings between or among any of
such stockholder, the beneficial owner on whose behalf the notice is given, each
nominee, and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant
to which the nominations are to be made by such stockholder |
| |
| |
– |
|
whether the proponent intends or is part of a group which intends to
solicit proxies from other stockholders in support of the nomination |
This notice must also include a signed consent of each nominee to serve as a director, if elected.
Compensation of Non-Management Directors. The NCG Committee is also responsible for
conducting an annual review of the compensation of the non-management directors and, when it deems
appropriate, recommending changes in their compensation to the Board. Hewitt Associates, LLC
(“Hewitt”), an independent compensation consulting firm directly engaged by the Compensation
Committee, assisted the NCG Committee in reviewing the 2010 compensation of the non-management
directors by providing the NCG Committee with competitive market data of non-management director
compensation of comparably sized publicly-traded oil and gas companies and an analysis of the types
and amounts of non-management director compensation shown in this analysis. Based on the
information provided by Hewitt, the NCG Committee made its recommendations to the Board, generally
targeting between the 50th and 75th percentiles of comparable non-management director compensation.
Based on the recommendations of the NCG Committee, the Board approves the amount of compensation
that the non-management directors receive for service on the Board and its committees. In the fourth
quarter of 2010, the
8
Compensation Committee transitioned from engaging Hewitt as its independent
compensation consulting firm to Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), a spin-off from
Hewitt.
Compensation Committee. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board in
discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of Quicksilver’s executives. The
Committee has the authority to engage compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of
compensation matters, and sole authority to retain and terminate any such consultants, including
sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for:
| |
• |
|
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation
of the Chief Executive Officer, evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in
light of those goals and objectives, and determining and approving the Chief Executive
Officer’s compensation level based on this evaluation; |
| |
| |
• |
|
reviewing and approving non-CEO executive officer compensation; |
| |
| |
• |
|
making recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and
equity-based plans that are subject to Board approval; |
| |
| |
• |
|
granting awards under the Quicksilver Resources Inc. 2006 Equity Plan, other than
awards to non-employee directors under such plan; |
| |
| |
• |
|
establishing, in the Committee’s discretion, any equity-based award pool (other than
an option pool) to be allocated among Quicksilver’s non-executive officer employees by
another committee of the Board; |
| |
| |
• |
|
establishing, in the Committee’s discretion, salary increase, bonus, other
non-equity-based award and option pools to be allocated among Quicksilver’s
non-executive officer employees by another committee of the Board or one or more
members of management; |
| |
| |
• |
|
reviewing the potential effect on Quicksilver of any risks arising from
Quicksilver’s employee compensation policies and practices; |
| |
| |
• |
|
reviewing and discussing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
disclosure required to be included in Quicksilver’s annual proxy statement or annual
report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and, based on this review and discussion,
determining whether to recommend to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis disclosure be included in Quicksilver’s annual proxy statement or annual
report on Form 10-K; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
publishing an annual Compensation Committee Report required by the SEC to be
included in Quicksilver’s annual proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC. |
Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for
consideration of executive compensation is set forth under “Executive Compensation —
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Quicksilver’s 2006 Equity Plan permits the Compensation Committee to delegate its
authority to grant awards, except for certain awards to executive officers and directors, to
one or more executive officers of Quicksilver. Pursuant to this authority, the Compensation
Committee has delegated to the Equity Awards Committee, which consists of Glenn Darden, the
authority to make certain awards to individuals other than executive officers and directors of
Quicksilver. Glenn Darden is a director and the Chief Executive Officer of Quicksilver.
The Compensation Committee met eight times during 2010.
9
Role of the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee engaged Hewitt during the
first three quarters of 2010, and Meridian during the fourth quarter of 2010 and in 2011, each
an independent compensation consultant, to provide research data and advice to the Compensation
Committee in connection with its determination of the types and amounts of compensation to be
provided to Quicksilver’s executives. The consultant provides its services at the request, and
under the direction, of the Compensation Committee. As discussed in further detail under
“Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the consultant provides the
Compensation Committee with competitive market data from a peer group and a survey, as well as
assists the Compensation Committee in evaluating and structuring its executive compensation
programs. In addition to the services provided to the Compensation Committee, as discussed
above, the consultant provides services to the NCG Committee in connection with its
determination of the types and amounts of compensation to be provided to Quicksilver’s
non-employee directors. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and
provides no other human resource services or advice to Quicksilver other than the services
provided to the Compensation Committee and the NCG Committee.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Dunn, Morris, Rogers and Warner serve on Quicksilver’s Compensation Committee. Byron
Dunn, the son of Quicksilver’s director W. Byron Dunn, is employed by Quicksilver as a landman.
For more information regarding the compensation received by Byron Dunn for his services see
“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Messrs. Glenn Darden and Thomas Darden are executive officers and directors of
Quicksilver, and Messrs. Jeff Cook and Philip Cook are executive officers of Quicksilver.
During 2010, each of Messrs. Glenn Darden, Thomas Darden, Jeff Cook and Philip Cook served as
executive officers and directors of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC. Quicksilver Gas Services
GP LLC did not have a compensation committee. During 2010, each of Messrs. Glenn Darden,
Thomas Darden, Jeff Cook and Philip Cook participated, in his capacity as a director, in the
deliberations of the board of directors of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC concerning executive
officer compensation. Upon the closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests in KGS
and Crestwood Gas Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010, each of Messrs. Glenn Darden, Jeff Cook
and Philip Cook resigned as executive officers and directors, and Mr. Thomas Darden resigned as
an executive officer (but continued to serve as a director) of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC.
For information regarding certain related-party transactions among Quicksilver and the Darden
family see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Board Leadership
Quicksilver separates the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in
recognition of the distinct contributions of these positions. The Chief Executive Officer is
responsible for the day-to-day leadership, management direction and performance of the company,
while the Chairman of the Board is responsible for determining growth opportunities, and
together with the Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for the strategic direction of
Quicksilver and presides over meetings of the full Board.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The Board utilizes an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process to assist in fulfilling its
oversight of Quicksilver’s risks. Management, which is responsible for day-to-day risk
management, conducts a risk assessment of Quicksilver’s business semiannually. The risk
assessment process is global in nature and has been developed to identify and assess
Quicksilver’s risks and to identify steps to mitigate and manage the risks, which may be
financial, operational or strategic in nature. All Quicksilver’s key business leaders,
functional heads and other managers are surveyed or interviewed to develop this information.
While risk oversight is a full Board responsibility, the responsibility for monitoring the
ERM process has been delegated to the Audit Committee. The results of each risk assessment are
reviewed with the Audit Committee and the full Board. The centerpiece of the assessment is a
discussion of Quicksilver’s key risks, which includes a review of the potential magnitude and
likelihood of each risk, the senior managers responsible for managing each risk and
management’s initiatives to manage each risk. Because overseeing risk is an
10
ongoing process and inherent in Quicksilver’s strategic decisions, the Board also
discusses risk throughout the year at other meetings in relation to specific proposed actions.
Director Compensation for 2010
Directors who are also employees of Quicksilver are not separately compensated for their
services as directors. For 2010, each non-employee director is entitled to an annual fee of
$205,000, with $49,500 of the fee payable in restricted stock, $49,500 payable in stock options and
$106,000 of the fee payable in cash (subject to elections by the directors to receive restricted
stock or stock options in lieu of some or all of the cash portion of the fee). The Quicksilver
restricted stock and stock options were granted in accordance with the terms of Quicksilver’s 2006
Equity Plan on January 4, 2010. In addition to the annual fee, each non-employee director also
received a one-time cash fee of $75,000 in connection with his service on the Transaction Committee
of the Board, which was formed to consider any transaction proposed by members of the Darden family
as well as alternative transactions.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation earned in 2010
by Quicksilver’s non-employee directors.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Fees Earned or |
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
|
| |
|
Paid in Cash |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Total |
| Name (1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
($) |
W. Byron Dunn |
|
|
75,000 |
(5) |
|
|
49,500 |
|
|
|
155,500 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
Steven M. Morris |
|
|
181,000 |
|
|
|
49,500 |
|
|
|
49,500 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
W. Yandell Rogers, III |
|
|
181,000 |
|
|
|
49,500 |
|
|
|
49,500 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
Mark J. Warner |
|
|
75,000 |
(5) |
|
|
49,500 |
|
|
|
155,500 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Messrs. Glenn Darden and Thomas Darden and Ms. Self serve as directors and executive officers
of Quicksilver and are not separately compensated for their services as directors. For
information regarding the compensation that Messrs. Glenn Darden and Thomas Darden received
for their services as Quicksilver’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Quicksilver’s
Chairman of the Board, respectively, see “Executive Compensation.” For information regarding
the compensation that Ms. Self received for her services as Quicksilver’s Vice President —
Human Resources, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” |
| |
| (2) |
|
This column reports the amount of compensation earned in 2010 and paid in cash for Board and
committee service. |
| |
| (3) |
|
The grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the 3,117
shares of restricted stock granted to each of the non-employee directors on January 4, 2010
was $49,500. Additional information regarding the calculation of this amount is included in
Note 2 and Note 16 to Quicksilver’s audited financial statements included in Quicksilver’s
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2010, the non-employee directors held the
following numbers of shares of unvested restricted stock: Mr. Dunn — 9,497; Mr. Morris —
9,497; Mr. Rogers — 9,497; and Mr. Warner — 9,497. |
| |
| (4) |
|
This column reports the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Additional information regarding the calculation of these
amounts is included in Note 2 and Note 16 to Quicksilver’s audited financial statements
included in Quicksilver’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The grant date fair value
calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the option to purchase 5,010 shares of
common stock granted to each of the non-employee directors on January 4, 2010 was $49,500.
The grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the option to
purchase 11,112 shares of common stock granted to each of Messrs. Dunn and Warner on January
4, 2010 in lieu of annual cash fees was $106,000. As of December 31, 2010, the non-employee
directors held options to purchase the following numbers of shares of common stock: Mr. Dunn
— 62,453; Mr. Morris — 69,701; Mr. Rogers — 42,920; and Mr. Warner — 80,813. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Messrs. Dunn and Warner elected to receive all of the annual $106,000 cash fee in the form of
an option to purchase 11,112 shares of common stock in accordance with the terms of
Quicksilver’s 2006 Equity Plan. |
11
Communication with the Board
Any stockholder or other interested party who wishes to communicate directly with the Board or
any of its members may do so by writing to: Board of Directors (or one or more named individuals)
c/o John C. Cirone, Senior Vice President — General Counsel, Quicksilver Resources Inc., 801
Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. Additionally, a stockholder or other
interested party can contact the non-employee directors at (800) 826-6762.
Board, Committee and Annual Meetings
The Board held 18 meetings during 2010. Each director attended at least 75% of the total
number of meetings of the Board and committees held during the periods that he or she served. All
persons serving on the Board at the time of such meetings attended the 2010 annual meeting of
Quicksilver’s stockholders and each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board in 2010.
Under Quicksilver’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director is expected to dedicate
adequate time, energy and attention to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties, which
includes attending meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she is a member. In
addition, Board members are expected to expend reasonable efforts to attend annual meetings of
Quicksilver’s stockholders.
12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL HOLDERS
Quicksilver Resources Inc.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of
Quicksilver common stock as of February 16, 2011, by:
| |
• |
|
each director of Quicksilver; |
| |
| |
• |
|
each named executive officer of Quicksilver; |
| |
| |
• |
|
all directors and executive officers of Quicksilver as a group; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
each person known to Quicksilver to beneficially own more than 5% of Quicksilver common
stock. |
Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the beneficial owner exercises sole voting and
investment power over the shares. The percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated on the
basis of 171,081,330 shares of Quicksilver common stock outstanding as of February 16, 2011.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number |
|
Percent of |
| Beneficial Owner |
|
of Shares |
|
Outstanding Shares |
Directors and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn Darden (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
45,525,480 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Thomas F. Darden (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
45,638,080 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Anne Darden Self (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
43,964,693 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
W. Byron Dunn (3)(5)(6) |
|
|
110,534 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven M. Morris (3)(5) |
|
|
380,502 |
|
|
|
* |
|
W. Yandell Rogers, III (3)(4)(5) |
|
|
163,697 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark J. Warner (3)(5) |
|
|
121,992 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John C. Cirone (3)(5)(7) |
|
|
228,518 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeff Cook (3)(5) |
|
|
820,989 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Philip W. Cook (2)(3)(4)(5)(6) |
|
|
316,019 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Directors
and executive officers as a group (14
persons)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) |
|
|
54,305,042 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of More Than 5% Not Named Above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Management, LLC (8) |
|
|
41,677,288 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
Quicksilver Energy L.P. (8) |
|
|
41,677,288 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
SPO Advisory Corp. (9) |
|
|
24,985,154 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
BlackRock, Inc. (10) |
|
|
9,702,864 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
| * |
|
Indicates less than 1% |
| |
| (1) |
|
Includes as to each of Messrs. Glenn Darden and Thomas Darden and Ms. Self: 41,677,288 shares
beneficially owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P., for which he or she has shared voting and
investment power as a member of Pennsylvania Management, LLC, the sole general partner of
Quicksilver Energy L.P. Each of Messrs. Glenn Darden and Thomas Darden and Ms. Self disclaims
beneficial ownership of all shares owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P., except to the extent of
his or her pecuniary interest therein. The business address of each of Messrs. Glenn Darden
and Thomas Darden and Ms. Self is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas
76102. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Includes with respect to each of the following individuals and all directors and executive
officers as a group, the following approximate numbers of shares represented by units in a
Unitized Stock Fund held through Quicksilver’s 401(k) Plan: Mr. Glenn Darden — 33,590; Mr.
Thomas Darden — 98,760; Ms. Self — 52,489; Mr. Philip W. Cook — 11,822; and all directors
and executive officers as a group — 206,464. |
13
|
|
|
| (3) |
|
Includes with respect to each of the following individuals and all directors and executive
officers as a group, the following numbers of shares subject to options that will vest on or
before April 17, 2011: Mr. Glenn Darden — 339,396; Mr. Thomas Darden — 339,396; Ms. Self —
43,584; Mr. Dunn — 54,197; Mr. Morris — 61,445; Mr. Rogers — 34,664; Mr. Warner — 72,557;
Mr. Cirone — 89,582; Mr. Jeff Cook — 161,409; Mr. Philip Cook — 87,804; and all directors
and executive officers as a group — 1,438,488. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Includes with respect to each of the following individuals and all directors and executive
officers as a group, the following numbers of shares pledged as collateral security for loans
or loan commitments or in accordance with customary terms and conditions of standard margin
account arrangements: Mr. Glenn Darden — 10,529,573 (including 9,685,861 shares beneficially
owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P.); Mr. Thomas Darden — 11,986,213 (including 9,685,861 shares
beneficially owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P.); Ms. Self — 9,785,861 (including 9,685,861
shares beneficially owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P.); Mr. Philip Cook — 54,117; and all
directors and executive officers as a group — 12,984,042 (including 9,685,861 shares
beneficially owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P.). |
| |
| (5) |
|
Includes with respect to each of the following individuals and all directors and executive
officers as a group, the following numbers of shares of unvested restricted stock for which
the indicated beneficial owners have no investment power: Mr. Glenn Darden — 333,400; Mr.
Thomas Darden — 333,400; Ms. Self — 28,647; Mr. Dunn — 15,186; Mr. Morris — 15,186; Mr.
Rogers — 8,062; Mr. Warner — 8,062; Mr. Cirone — 31,527; Mr. Jeff Cook — 160,417; Mr.
Philip Cook — 130,722; and all directors and officers as a group — 1,198,466. |
| |
| (6) |
|
Includes as to each of Messrs. Dunn and Philip Cook, 31,289 and 101,164 shares, respectively,
held by him jointly with his spouse. |
| |
| (7) |
|
Includes 2,502 shares subject to restricted stock units that will vest on or before April 17,
2011 and for which Mr. Cirone has no voting or investment power. |
| |
| (8) |
|
As sole general partner of Quicksilver Energy L.P., Pennsylvania Management, LLC has sole
voting and investment power with respect to 41,677,288 shares of Quicksilver common stock
beneficially owned by Quicksilver Energy L.P. The address of Pennsylvania Management, LLC and
Quicksilver Energy L.P. is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. |
| |
| (9) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13D filed by SPO Advisory Corp. with the SEC on March 17, 2011, SPO
Advisory Corp. had sole voting and investment power over 24,985,154 shares, SPO Partners II,
L.P. had sole voting and investment power over 23,311,254 shares, SPO Advisory Partners, L.P.
had sole voting and investment power over 23,311,254 shares, San Francisco Partners, L.P. had
sole voting and investment power over 1,673,900 shares, SF Advisory Partners, L.P. had sole
voting and investment power over 1,673,900 shares, John H. Scully had sole voting and
investment power over 19,900 shares and shared voting and investment power over 24,985,154
shares, William E. Oberndorf had sole voting and investment power over 155,400 shares and
shared voting and investment power over 24,985,154 shares, and Edward H. McDermott had sole
voting and investment power over 2,300 shares and shared voting and investment power over
24,985,154 shares. The address of SPO Advisory Corp., SPO Partners II, L.P., SPO Advisory
Partners, L.P., San Francisco Partners, L.P., SF Advisory Partners, L.P., John H. Scully,
William E. Oberndorf, and Edward H. McDermott is 591 Redwood Highway, Suite 3215, Mill Valley,
California 94941. |
| |
| (10) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 8, 2011, BlackRock,
Inc. had sole voting and investment power over 9,702,864 shares of Quicksilver common stock.
The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022. |
14
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Quicksilver’s executive officers
and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of its equity securities, to
file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and
greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC rules to furnish Quicksilver with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
To Quicksilver’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to
Quicksilver with respect to 2010 and written representations from Quicksilver’s directors,
executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders, Quicksilver believes that during 2010 all of
its executive officers and directors and all owners of more than 10% of Quicksilver common stock
were in compliance with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that Mark J.
Warner filed one late report disclosing one transaction not timely reported.
15
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2010, with respect to shares of
common stock that may be issued under Quicksilver’s existing equity compensation plans.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of common |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock remaining available for |
| |
|
Number of shares of |
|
Weighted-average exercise |
|
future issuance under equity |
| |
|
common stock to be issued upon |
|
price of outstanding |
|
compensation plans (excluding |
| |
|
exercise of outstanding options, |
|
options, warrants and |
|
shares of common stock |
| Plan Category |
|
warrants and rights |
|
rights |
|
reflected in column (a)) |
| |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity compensation plans approved
by stockholders (1) |
|
|
3,478,218 |
(2) |
|
$ |
11.10 |
(3) |
|
|
14,146,840 |
(4) |
Equity compensation plans not
approved by stockholders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
3,478,218 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
|
14,146,840 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Consists of the 2006 Equity Plan and the Amended and Restated 2004 Non-Employee Director
Equity Plan. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Consists of 3,348,642 options and 129,576 stock-settled restricted stock units. Each
restricted stock unit entitles the holder to receive, upon vesting and without payment of any
cash, one share of common stock with respect to each restricted stock unit. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Reflects the weighted-average exercise price for the 3,348,642 options outstanding under
equity compensation plans approved by stockholders. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Upon stockholder approval of Quicksilver’s 2006 Equity Plan, Quicksilver ceased to grant
awards under the 2004 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan. Accordingly, this number reflects
only shares of common stock remaining available for future issuance under the 2006 Equity
Plan. |
16
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of 2010 Compensation
Below is an overview of the more detailed disclosure in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis regarding Quicksilver’s 2010 compensation program for Quicksilver’s named executive
officers.
| |
• |
|
There were no changes to the compensation philosophy, objectives or components from
2009 to 2010. |
| |
| |
• |
|
The main objectives of the compensation program are to improve company performance
by creating a direct relationship between compensation and company performance and to
attract, retain and motivate high-quality executive officers. |
| |
| |
• |
|
Quicksilver provides the following elements of compensation for the named executive
officers: base salary, annual cash and equity bonuses, long-term incentive equity
awards, retirement benefits and limited perquisites. |
| |
| |
• |
|
Quicksilver targets the 50th percentile of the competitive market when considering
cash compensation and between the 50th and 75th percentiles when considering long-term
incentives. |
| |
| |
• |
|
The annual bonus program provides awards based on achievement of financial and
operational goals. The 2010 performance goals consisted of cash flow from operations,
earnings per share, finding and development cost, production and reserves. During
2010, in spite of the economic conditions, Quicksilver’s strong operating and financial
performance resulted in an annual bonus payout of 99% percent of target. |
| |
| |
• |
|
Quicksilver encourages the named executive officers to think and act like owners and
enhance their commitment to Quicksilver’s success through the award of equity-based
long-term incentive grants. In 2010, the grants to the named executive officers
included: stock options to purchase Quicksilver common stock; shares of restricted
stock or restricted stock units; and awards of phantom units payable in KGS common
units. |
| |
| |
• |
|
The Compensation Committee makes all compensation decisions regarding the named
executive officers, but may seek input and guidance from the Chief Executive Officer,
senior management and the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant. |
Objectives
Quicksilver’s philosophy with respect to compensation of its executive officers is to improve
company performance by creating a direct relationship between compensation and company performance
and by providing competitive compensation in order to attract, retain and motivate high-quality
executive officers. To accomplish the objectives of this philosophy, the Compensation Committee
believes that compensation should:
| |
• |
|
take into account both personal performance and Quicksilver’s performance; |
| |
| |
• |
|
be structured to advance both the short- and long-term interests of Quicksilver and
its stockholders; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
tie a significant portion of the named executive officers’ compensation to the value
of Quicksilver stock to encourage them to think and act like owners and enhance their
commitment to Quicksilver’s success. |
17
Compensation Strategies
To achieve these objectives, the Compensation Committee employs the following general
compensation strategies with respect to compensation of the named executive officers:
| |
• |
|
target base salary and cash bonus at the 50th percentile of competitive market data
for a peer group of 13 companies in the oil and natural gas exploration and production
industry and competitive market data for a survey of companies in the industry, as
described below; |
| |
| |
• |
|
target long-term incentive compensation, in the form of equity-based awards, between
the 50th and 75th percentiles of the competitive market data (or higher if base salary
or target cash bonus is set below the 50th percentile); and |
| |
| |
• |
|
target total compensation between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the competitive
market data. |
In considering the 2010 compensation packages for the named executive officers, the
Compensation Committee discussed potential changes from 2009 compensation packages to the level and
form of compensation in light of Quicksilver’s compensation philosophy, the overall economy and
Quicksilver’s and individual performance. The Compensation Committee also examined the objectives
behind each component of compensation for each of the named executive officers and considered the
potential economic consequences of making changes from both an operational standpoint and a
stockholder perspective.
As part of this process, the Compensation Committee worked with Hewitt, the Chief Financial
Officer, the Vice President — Human Resources and the Senior Vice President — General Counsel to
evaluate whether risks arising from Quicksilver’s compensation policies and practices are
reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Quicksilver. Following this review, the
Compensation Committee concluded that Quicksilver’s current compensation policies and practices do
not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Quicksilver.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has the responsibility for reviewing and recommending Quicksilver’s
executive compensation program, including reviewing and approving all compensation decisions for
Quicksilver’s named executive officers. The Compensation Committee strives to maintain sound basic
practices for the development and administration of Quicksilver’s compensation program. The
Compensation Committee has set forth certain practices to effectively carry out its
responsibilities, such as:
| |
• |
|
maintaining membership of only independent directors in accordance with NYSE
requirements; |
| |
| |
• |
|
holding executive sessions without senior management present; |
| |
| |
• |
|
annually reviewing detailed compensation tally sheets for each of the named
executive officers; |
| |
| |
• |
|
engaging an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation
Committee; |
| |
| |
• |
|
meeting with the independent compensation consultant without senior management
present at least once during the year to discuss Quicksilver’s compensation program and
actions on a confidential basis; |
| |
| |
• |
|
assessing the independent compensation consultant’s performance and providing
feedback as appropriate; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
evaluating the performance of the Compensation Committee each year. |
18
Role of Executive Management
Each year senior management presents Quicksilver’s financial and operating budget to the Board
for the next fiscal year for approval. The performance measures and targets for the annual bonus
awards are recommended by senior management to the Compensation Committee based on the
Board-approved budget. After year end, senior management reviews the actual performance with the
Compensation Committee and recommends annual bonus awards for each named executive officer.
All compensation decisions include an assessment of individual performance, including each
named executive officer’s contribution to Quicksilver’s overall performance for the applicable
performance period, experience, skills, scope of responsibility and tenure. The Chief Executive
Officer each year evaluates all named executive officers and makes compensation recommendations to
the Compensation Committee for all named executive officers except himself. In making individual
compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses these recommendations.
The Compensation Committee completes a performance assessment of the Chief Executive Officer each
year, which is discussed with him. In executive session, the Compensation Committee develops its
own recommendation for, and approves, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer.
Certain members of senior management have key roles in supporting the Compensation Committee
as described above including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Vice
President — Human Resources.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of
outside advisors, experts and others to assist the Compensation Committee in the performance of its
duties. During 2009 and the first three quarters of 2010, the Compensation Committee engaged
Hewitt and, during fourth quarter of 2010, engaged Meridian to serve as the Compensation
Committee’s independent compensation consultant on matters related to executive compensation. The
consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and provides no other human resource
services or advice to Quicksilver other than the services provided to the Compensation Committee
and the NCG Committee. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and establishes the scope of
the engagement of the consultant, which is reflected in an annual engagement letter between the
consultant and the Compensation Committee.
The consultant provides advice to the Compensation Committee on matters related to the
fulfillment of its responsibilities under its charter, including the overall design of
Quicksilver’s executive compensation program, competitive compensation market data, review of the
disclosures in Quicksilver’s proxy statement, annual review of the Compensation Committee’s
charter, legislative and regulatory developments and all other matters related to the compensation
of Quicksilver’s named executive officers.
The Compensation Committee at its request can meet with its consultant in executive session
without members of management present. The consultant also communicates with the Compensation
Committee Chairman outside of the meetings. The consultant reviews materials prepared by senior
management, including recommendations and proposals being submitted to the Compensation Committee
and provides advice and guidance to the Compensation Committee regarding these recommendations.
The consultant also gathers and provides competitive market data and other background information
for consideration by the Compensation Committee.
Senior management works with the consultant as necessary to support the work of the consultant
on behalf of the Compensation Committee. The interactions of the consultant with senior management
are limited to those that are on the Compensation Committee’s behalf or related to proposals that
will be presented to the Compensation Committee for review and approval.
Summary of 2010 Compensation
The named executive officers are Quicksilver’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and the three most highly-compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer who served as an executive officer as of December 31, 2010.
For 2010, the named executive officers were Messrs. Glenn Darden, Philip W. Cook, Thomas F. Darden,
Jeff Cook and John C. Cirone.
19
General
Each element of Quicksilver’s compensation program is intended to advance Quicksilver’s
objectives of attracting, retaining and motivating talented executives, and to enhance
Quicksilver’s competitive position in the market for executive-level talent and to improve company
performance. Quicksilver’s compensation program for the named executive officers in 2010 consisted
of base salary, annual cash and equity bonuses, long-term incentive equity awards, retirement
benefits and limited perquisites. In addition, Quicksilver provides change-in-control benefits for
each of the named executive officers.
The charts below reflect the average percentage of total target compensation represented by
each element of the compensation package for (1) the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of
the Board and (2) the other named executive officers. For purposes of computing these percentages,
target opportunity (rather than actual payments) of both the cash and equity awards granted under
the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan were used.
| |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
Other Named Executive Officers |
The Compensation Committee believes that this mix of compensation elements provides sufficient
fixed cash compensation in the form of base salary to attract and retain qualified executives. The
Compensation Committee also believes the mix places an adequate amount of potential cash
compensation at risk to motivate the executives to achieve annual company goals, and provides the
executives with sufficient equity incentives to motivate them to achieve long-term company goals.
In addition, because the equity component vests over time, it encourages executives to continue
their employment relationship with Quicksilver.
All compensation decisions include an assessment of individual performance, including the
named executive officer’s contribution to our overall performance for the applicable performance
period, experience, skills, scope of responsibility and tenure. The Chief Executive Officer each
year evaluates all named executive officers and makes compensation recommendations to the
Compensation Committee for all named executive officers except himself. In making individual
compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses these recommendations.
The Compensation Committee completes a performance assessment of the Chief Executive Officer each
year, which is discussed with him. In executive session, the Compensation Committee develops its
own recommendation for, and approves, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. In
addition, the Compensation Committee reviews tally sheets presenting the individual components and
total compensation for each named executive officer to provide an overall current and historical
perspective of each individual’s compensation and an annual growth and compensation analysis
presenting changes in Quicksilver’s performance relative to changes in compensation of the named
executive officers and other employees of Quicksilver. While not directly considered when making
compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews the equity holdings and
wealth accumulation analyses of the named executive officers, which include unvested stock awards
and unexercised stock options. In arriving at the compensation packages for the named executive
officers for 2010, the Compensation Committee received input from Hewitt and senior management.
The companies included in the competitive market data are identical to the companies included
in Quicksilver’s 2009 peer group. Quicksilver’s peer group for 2010 consisted of the following 13
small to midsize
20
publicly-traded companies engaged in oil and natural gas production and exploration: Cabot
Oil & Gas Corporation, Cimarex Energy Co., Comstock Resources, Inc., Denbury Resources Inc., Forest
Oil Corporation, Newfield Exploration Company, Petrohawk Energy Corporation, Range Resources
Corporation, Southwestern Energy Company, St. Mary Land & Exploration Company, Swift Energy
Company, Ultra Petroleum Corp. and Whiting Petroleum Corporation. Factors considered in selecting
the 2010 peer group included type of business, revenue, assets, market capitalization and
enterprise value. Hewitt provided the Compensation Committee with a detailed report on the
compensation of executives serving companies in the 2010 peer group, as well as competitive market
data from a North American oil and gas exploration and production industry survey.
Base Salaries
Base salaries are intended to attract executive talent and compensate executives for their
experiences, skills, scope of responsibility and tenure. In evaluating the 2010 base salaries of
the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considered Quicksilver’s performance and
each executive’s skills and experience, the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the performance
of the Chief Executive Officer and, with respect to the other named executive officers, the Chief
Executive Officer’s evaluation of the performance of each named executive officer. In addition,
the Compensation Committee considered competitive market data with a view to targeting the 50th
percentile for comparable positions.
In November 2009, after considerable discussion of Quicksilver’s compensation philosophy, the
overall economy and Quicksilver’s and individual performance, and in consultation with Hewitt and
senior management, upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation
Committee determined that no salary adjustments for 2010 would be made for any of the named
executive officers, even though the base salaries of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer were below the 25th percentile and the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
— Operations were at the 25th percentile of the competitive market data while the Senior Vice
President — General Counsel was between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the competitive market
data.
Bonuses
Annual bonus targets are set to reflect a range of award levels that are intended to be
competitive with awards offered by other peer companies to reward similarly situated executives.
The Compensation Committee includes annual bonuses in the named executive officers’ pay mix to
ensure their focus on the annual performance goals that have been developed to align with
Quicksilver’s long-term strategy and objectives that it believes will ultimately increase
stockholder value. Because payouts under Quicksilver’s annual bonus plan each year are linked to
the achievement of overall corporate goals for that year (with the relevant goals and objectives
established and communicated near the beginning of each year), these bonuses are designed to
incentivize the named executive officers to achieve Quicksilver’s near-term objectives. In
addition, to encourage the named executive officers to continually focus on meeting stockholder
value over the long term, Quicksilver pays a portion of the annual bonus in shares of restricted
stock or restricted stock units that vest over three years, one third on each of the first three
anniversaries of the date of grant. Annual bonuses were awarded under the 2010 Executive Bonus
Plan in 2011.
Quicksilver’s Chief Executive Officer formulated a proposed 2010 Executive Bonus Plan, which
he presented to the Compensation Committee for consideration in November 2009. The Chief Executive
Officer’s proposal recommended annual cash bonuses providing target opportunities sufficient to
bring the named executive officers’ total cash compensation to between the 25th and 50th
percentiles of total compensation for similar positions in the competitive market data except for
the Executive Vice President — Operations whose total cash compensation was at the 25th percentile
and the Senior Vice President — General Counsel whose total cash compensation was between the 50th
and 75th percentiles. The Senior Vice President — General Counsel’s target and maximum
opportunities for the cash bonus were increased to 85% and 170%, respectively, and for the
restricted stock unit bonus to 55% and 110%, respectively. The Chief Executive Officer recommended
this increase in bonus opportunity because of the Senior Vice President — General Counsel’s
breadth of responsibilities and contributions to Quicksilver, to provide greater retentive
incentive for the Senior Vice President — General Counsel and to bring his bonus in line with that
of Quicksilver’s other senior vice president. The Compensation Committee also explored with senior
management the likelihood of Quicksilver achieving the targeted performance measures. The
Compensation Committee considered Hewitt’s review regarding the proposed 2010 Executive Bonus Plan.
21
On November 17, 2009, the Compensation Committee adopted the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan subject
to the Board’s approval of Quicksilver’s 2010 budget on December 8, 2009. The Compensation
Committee established target and maximum levels with respect to the cash bonuses to be paid under
the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan for the named executive officers as a percentage of each
participant’s base salary for 2010, as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Cash Bonus |
| |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
| |
|
Percentage |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
Dollar |
| |
|
of |
|
Amount |
|
of |
|
Amount |
| Name |
|
Base Pay |
|
($) |
|
Base Pay |
|
($) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
150 |
% |
|
|
660,000 |
|
|
|
300 |
% |
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
280,500 |
|
|
|
170 |
% |
|
|
561,000 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
150 |
% |
|
|
660,000 |
|
|
|
300 |
% |
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
770,000 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
|
170 |
% |
|
|
510,000 |
|
The Compensation Committee also established target and maximum levels with respect to the
restricted stock or restricted stock unit bonus to be paid under the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan for
the named executive officers, expressed as a percentage of each participant’s base salary for 2010,
as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Bonus |
| |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
| |
|
Percentage |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
Dollar |
| |
|
of |
|
Value |
|
of |
|
Value |
| Name |
|
Base Pay |
|
($) |
|
Base Pay |
|
($) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
880,000 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
181,500 |
|
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
363,000 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
880,000 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
462,000 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
330,000 |
|
The 2010 Executive Bonus Plan provides that the number of shares of restricted stock or restricted
stock units to be received as a bonus would be determined by dividing the applicable dollar amount
of the bonus by the closing market price of Quicksilver’s common stock on the date of grant (i.e.,
the payment date). The Compensation Committee believes these grants of restricted stock or
restricted stock units encourage the named executive officers to think and act like owners and to
enhance their commitment to Quicksilver. The awards are intended to reward the long-term
performance of Quicksilver and how that performance is viewed by its stockholders.
The Compensation Committee established the performance measures, the relative weight to be
assigned to each performance measure and the percentage of target bonus to be awarded for
achievement of various performance levels with respect to each performance measure under the 2010
Executive Bonus Plan. The Compensation Committee revised the weights from 2009 to more heavily
weight finding and development costs for new reserves to focus more awareness on effectively
managing these costs while decreasing the weighting on reserves and production measures.
Quicksilver believes these adjustments better reflect current year objectives that it expects its
employees to achieve. Bonus payouts under the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan are based on actual
performance relative to the established performance targets and weightings.
The 2010 Executive Bonus Plan provides for payment of the target payout if 100% of budget is
achieved for all performance measures. A threshold payment of 50% of target is earned for a
performance measure if achievement for such performance measure is more than 50% but less than 80%
of budget. A payment of 60% of target is earned for a performance measure if achievement for such
performance measure is 80% of budget. A maximum payment of 200% of target is earned for a
performance measure if achievement for such performance measure is 120% of budget. Payments earned
increase in 5% increments from 60% to 100% of target for a performance measure as achievement for
such performance measure against budget increases in 10% increments from 80% to 100% of budget.
Payments earned increase in 25% increments from 100% to 200% of target for a
22
performance measure as achievement for such performance measure against budget increases in 5%
increments from 100% to 120% of budget. The Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust
downward a named executive officer’s potential award based on qualitative individual performance
measures. In addition, if 50% or less of budget is achieved for a performance measure, the
Compensation Committee has the discretion to pay a named executive officer an amount not to exceed
25% of the individual’s target amount with respect to that performance measure. The Compensation
Committee believes that paying such bonuses in appropriate circumstances could advance
Quicksilver’s objectives of attracting, retaining and motivating talented executives.
Each performance measure, its assigned weight, the level at which its achievement would result
in payment of the target and maximum amounts, and the level at which it was actually achieved are
set forth in the table below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
of Budget |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Budget |
|
for |
|
Percentage of |
|
Percentage |
| Performance |
|
Assigned |
|
|
|
|
|
for Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Budget |
|
of Target |
| Measure |
|
Weight |
|
Budget |
|
Payout |
|
Payout |
|
Achieved |
|
Awarded |
Cash flow from operations |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$539.2 Million |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
Earnings per share |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Finding and development costs |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$1.40 per Mcfe |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
125 |
% |
Production |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
163.8 Bcfe |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Reserves |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
2,600 Bcfe |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
112 |
% |
|
|
150 |
% |
The 2010 Executive Bonus Plan provides that the performance levels are to be calculated to exclude
the effects of any extraordinary or nonrecurring events, changes in accounting principles and
acquisitions or divestitures, and may be otherwise adjusted as permitted in the 2006 Equity Plan,
which indicates that the performance targets may be modified in circumstances in which the
Compensation Committee deems such modification appropriate and equitable.
Based on Quicksilver’s achievement of performance levels with respect to the performance
measures, as adjusted, each of the named executive officers received 99% of his target bonus
payout. Accordingly, the named executive officers received the following annual bonuses:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Bonus |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
| |
|
Cash Bonus |
|
Dollar Amount |
|
Restricted Stock |
| Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
Units (1) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
653,400 |
|
|
|
435,600 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
277,695 |
|
|
|
179,685 |
|
|
|
12,815 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
653,400 |
|
|
|
435,600 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
381,150 |
|
|
|
228,690 |
|
|
|
16,310 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
252,450 |
|
|
|
163,350 |
|
|
|
11,650 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
All the named executive officers received their restricted stock bonuses in the
form of restricted shares, except for Mr. Cirone who received his in the form of
restricted stock units because he will be retirement eligible under the 2006 Equity Plan
during the term of his grant. |
The cash bonuses were paid on March 16, 2011 and are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2010. The shares of restricted stock and
restricted stock units were granted under the 2006 Equity Plan on March 11, 2011, and, therefore,
in accordance with SEC rules, do not appear in the Summary Compensation Table for 2010.
23
Long-Term Equity Awards
The Compensation Committee includes long-term equity awards in the named executive officers’
pay mix to encourage them to think and act like owners and to enhance their long-term commitment to
Quicksilver. The awards are intended to reward the named executive officers for long-term
performance of Quicksilver and how that performance is viewed by its stockholders. In November
2009, the Compensation Committee considered appropriate long-term incentive awards for 2010. The
Compensation Committee considered that these long-term incentive awards should be in amounts to
position total compensation for all of the named executive officers between the 50th and 75th
percentiles of similarly positioned executives included in the competitive market data, except for
the Chief Financial Officer whose total compensation was at the 50th percentile and the Senior Vice
President — General Counsel whose total compensation was just above the 75th percentile. The
Compensation Committee determined that the amount of long-term incentives awarded would be the same
dollar amount awarded in 2009 for each of the named executive officers except for the Senior Vice
President — General Counsel. The Chief Executive Officer recommended an increase in the amount of
the Senior Vice President — General Counsel’s long-term incentive awards because of his breadth of
responsibilities and contributions to Quicksilver, to provide greater retentive incentive for him
to bring his grant in line with that of Quicksilver’s other senior vice president.
Based on the belief that stock options provide a greater focus on stock price performance than
restricted stock (because stock options will ultimately deliver value only to the extent the price
of Quicksilver common stock at the time of the exercise exceeds the exercise price) and that the
peer group companies include grants of stock options as part of their long-term incentive
compensation portfolio, the Chief Executive Officer recommended to the Compensation Committee that,
in addition to the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted as part of the annual bonus
award, a portion of the named executive officers’ long-term incentive compensation should be
granted in the form of stock options.
Prior to October 1, 2010, the named executive officers of Quicksilver were also the executive
officers of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC. On October 1, 2010, Quicksilver sold its interests in
KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC and the named executive officers resigned as officers of
Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC. Pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement among Quicksilver, Quicksilver
Gas Services GP LLC and KGS that was effect until October 1, 2010, KGS was allocated a portion of
the costs associated with the compensation and benefits provided by Quicksilver to the named
executive officers.
In discussing the allocation to KGS of a portion of the cost of providing compensation and
benefits to the named executive officers, Quicksilver’s Chief Executive Officer (who served as the
Chairman of the Board of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC) in November 2009 determined that, for
2010, it would be appropriate for KGS to bear a portion of these costs in two forms. First, KGS
would be allocated a percentage of costs for the base salary and benefits (excluding annual
bonuses) provided by Quicksilver, generally based on the estimated percentage of time the named
executive officers devote to KGS versus Quicksilver in 2010. The second component would be in the
form of equity, as to which KGS would provide 25% of the total long-term incentive equity awards
payable to each named executive officer, to provide a direct connection to KGS’s performance and to
encourage the named executive officers to think and act like owners of KGS as well as Quicksilver.
Based on the foregoing considerations, after consultation with Hewitt, the Compensation
Committee approved the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation that the long-term incentive
compensation provided to the named executive officers in the form of equity-based awards consist of
three components in the following percentages (based on grant date values) for 2010: stock options
to purchase Quicksilver common stock (37.5%); restricted shares or restricted stock units of
Quicksilver common stock (37.5%); and awards of phantom units payable in KGS common units (25%).
The structure was presented to the board of directors of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC (which
consisted of four Quicksilver executives and three members independent of Quicksilver and KGS),
which concurred that this structure is appropriate and approved the grant of phantom units to the
named executive officers.
Accordingly, based on these factors, the overall economy and Quicksilver’s performance, and
consistent with the Compensation Committee’s policy to grant long-term incentive awards near the
beginning of each year, effective January 4, 2010, the Compensation Committee made grants of
restricted stock or restricted stock units and stock options to the named executive officers under
the 2006 Equity Plan and the board of directors of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC made grants of
KGS phantom units as set forth under “Executive Compensation — Grants of
24
Plan-Based Awards in 2010.” The Compensation Committee grants long-term incentive awards near
the beginning of each year to align the performance periods for the awards with Quicksilver’s
fiscal periods. Each Quicksilver grant vests one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of
the date of grant. The KGS phantom units were to vest one-third on the first business day
occurring on or after each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant (or the named
executive officer’s death or disability or a change-in-control) and were to be settled in KGS
common units immediately upon vesting. However, on October 1, 2010, in connection with
Quicksilver’s sale of its interests in KGS, all unvested KGS phantom units granted to each of the
named executive officers vested as a result of a change-in-control under the KGS 2007 Equity Plan.
Retirement Benefits
The Compensation Committee includes retirement benefits as part of the compensation for named
executive officers in order to attract and retain executive talent. The named executive officers
are eligible to participate in Quicksilver’s 401(k) plan on the same basis as other Quicksilver
U.S. employees, including with regard to the receipt of contributions to the 401(k) plan by
Quicksilver. In addition, all outstanding Quicksilver equity awards granted to named executive
officers generally vest immediately upon a qualified retirement.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
Quicksilver does not view perquisites as a significant element of compensation and,
accordingly, limits the use of perquisites to those that the Compensation Committee believes are
necessary for competitive reasons. The named executive officers are also eligible to receive the
health, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment, and long-term disability
insurance generally available to all Quicksilver U.S. employees.
Summary of 2011 Compensation
General
In 2010, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian to serve as its independent compensation
consultant in connection with 2011 compensation for the named executive officers. The Compensation
Committee received input from Meridian and senior management in arriving at the compensation
packages for the named executive officers for 2011.
The Compensation Committee considered publicly available compensation information filed with
the SEC by the companies in Quicksilver’s 2011 peer group, as compiled by Meridian, and competitive
market data from a North American oil and gas exploration and production industry survey.
Quicksilver’s peer group for 2011 consisted of the following 13 small to midsize publicly-traded
companies engaged in oil and natural gas production and exploration: Berry Petroleum Company, Bill
Barrett Corporation, Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Forest Oil Corporation, Newfield Exploration
Company, Petrohawk Energy Corporation, QEP Resources, Inc., Range Resources Corporation,
Southwestern Energy Company, SM Energy Company (formerly known as St. Mary Land & Exploration
Company), Swift Energy Company, Ultra Petroleum Corp. and Whiting Petroleum Corporation. After
consultation among the Compensation Committee, Meridian and the Vice President — Human Resources,
Berry Petroleum Company, Bill Barrett Corporation and QEP Resources, Inc. were added to the peer
group for 2011. These additions were made to maintain Quicksilver’s relative asset, revenue and
market capitalization position among the peers and to replace three companies no longer used
because they failed to meet Quicksilver’s selection criteria for the peer group. Factors
considered in selecting the 2011 peer group included type of business, revenue, assets, market
capitalization, enterprise value and total stockholder return.
In considering the compensation packages, the Compensation Committee discussed potential
changes to the level and form of compensation in light of Quicksilver’s compensation philosophy and
Quicksilver’s and individual performance. The Compensation Committee also examined the objectives
behind each component of compensation for each of the named executive officers and considered the
potential economic consequences from both an operational standpoint and a stockholder perspective.
25
Base Salaries
Based on the foregoing considerations, the Compensation Committee approved the following
increases in the base salaries of the named executive officers in November 2010:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Salary Increase |
|
Salary Increase |
| Name |
|
($) |
|
(%) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
The Compensation Committee determined that the above adjustments would be made for 2011 in
light of each named executive officer’s individual performance and the Compensation Committee’s
desire to retain these individuals by positioning the base salaries of each between the 25th and
50th percentiles of the competitive market data except for the Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer whose base salaries were below the 25th percentile of the competitive market
data.
Bonuses
Consistent with Quicksilver’s compensation strategies, the Compensation Committee approved the
2011 Executive Bonus Plan in February 2011. The structure of the 2011 Executive Bonus Plan is
similar to that of the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan except for the addition of a provision to conform
the treatment of payments in the event of a change in control under the 2011 Executive Bonus Plan
with the treatment under the Change in Control Plan. As a percentage of base pay, the target and
maximum opportunities are the same as those provided to the named executive officers in 2010,
positioning target total cash compensation below the 25th percentile of the competitive market data
for the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, between the 25th and 50th
percentiles for the Chief Financial Officer and between the 50th and 75th percentiles for the
Executive Vice President — Operations and the Senior Vice President — General Counsel. The
specified company performance measures for 2011 and assigned weights are also the same as under the
2010 Executive Bonus Plan, with bonus amounts to be based on actual performance relative to
Quicksilver’s 2011 budget.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
For long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity-based awards, the Compensation
Committee, considered the mix of long-term incentive awards. The targeted value of the long-term
incentive awards position target total compensation for all of the named executive officers between
50th and 75th percentiles of the competitive market data for the Chairman of the Board and the
Chief Executive Officer, at the 50th percentile for the Chief Financial Officer and the Executive
Vice President — Operations and above the 75th percentile for the Senior Vice President — General
Counsel. Similar to 2010, the Chief Executive Officer recommended to the Compensation Committee
that 50% of the value of total Quicksilver equity-based awards granted to each named executive
officer should be in the form of restricted stock or restricted stock units with the remaining 50%
in the form of stock options. The Compensation Committee concurred with his recommendation.
26
Accordingly, in November 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the Quicksilver equity
grants made on January 3, 2011, to the named executive officers as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
| |
|
Number of Shares |
|
of Restricted Stock |
| |
|
of Common Stock |
|
or Restricted |
| Name |
|
Underlying Options |
|
Stock Units (1) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
169,747 |
|
|
|
104,167 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
65,708 |
|
|
|
40,323 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
169,747 |
|
|
|
104,167 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
79,398 |
|
|
|
48,723 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
60,233 |
|
|
|
36,962 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
All the named executive officers received shares of restricted stock, except
Mr. Cirone who received restricted stock units because he will be retirement eligible
under the 2006 Equity Plan during the term of his grant. |
All of these equity awards have terms consistent with equity awards previously granted by
Quicksilver.
Change in Control Arrangements
Quicksilver has certain change in control plans and certain features in its incentive
compensation plans that relate to a change in control of Quicksilver. These plans are intended to
provide for continuity of management in connection with a change in control of Quicksilver.
On August 24, 2004, the Board adopted the Change in Control Plan in which each of the named
executive officers participates. Severance benefits are provided if, within a specified period
after a change in control occurs, there is an involuntary termination of a covered individual
(including termination for specified “good reason” events). The Board adopted this “double
trigger” provision because the Board determined that an individual who retained his or her position
after a change in control should not receive a severance benefit simply because a change in control
occurred. The benefits provided upon an involuntary termination under the plan include (i) a lump
sum payment of three times the sum of a named executive officer’s base salary plus benchmark bonus;
(ii) certain medical, dental, vision and group life insurance coverage and (iii) accelerated
vesting of outstanding equity awards and 401(k) account balances, to the extent permitted by law.
For more information regarding the Change in Control Plan see “—Potential Payments Upon
Termination or in Connection with a Change in Control.” On November 24, 2008, upon the
Compensation Committee’s recommendation, the Board amended the Change in Control Plan to provide
that Quicksilver will make an additional payment to a named executive officer equal to the excise
tax imposed, if any, together with any interest or penalties with respect to the excise tax. For
more information regarding the amendment see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or in
Connection with a Change in Control. The Compensation Committee and Board believe that providing
this tax protection helps Quicksilver to attract and retain high-quality named executive officers.
If a named executive officer participating in the Change in Control Plan remains employed by
Quicksilver for six months following a change in control, the named executive officer would be
entitled to a retention bonus equal to one-half of the individual’s base salary, payable as a lump
sum payment. The Board adopted this provision to encourage the named executive officers to remain
with the acquired company for a sufficient period of time after a change in control to assist with
a successful transition. Also, the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan and 2011 Executive Bonus Plan provide
that, if a change in control occurs during the plan year, each named executive officer is entitled
to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to his maximum potential payout under the plan for the
full plan year. The 2011 Executive Bonus Plan also provides, in conformity with the Change in
Control Plan, for an additional payment to a named executive officer equal to the excise tax
imposed, if any, together with any interest or penalties with respect to excise taxes. In
addition, the agreements evidencing Quicksilver equity awards provide that those awards vest upon
the occurrence of a change in control. The Compensation Committee believes that these
change-in-control arrangements help to maintain the named executive officers’ objectivity in
decision making, provide a retention incentive in circumstances where executive continuity may be
particularly important and retention risks may be particularly acute, and otherwise align the
interests of the named executive officers with those of Quicksilver’s stockholders.
27
Tax and Accounting Considerations
The Compensation Committee considers the tax and accounting treatment of compensation elements
in determining types and levels of compensation for the named executive officers. For example,
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) places a limit of $1 million on
the amount of compensation that may be deducted for tax purposes by Quicksilver in any one fiscal
year with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and the other three most highly compensated
individuals (other than the Chief Financial Officer) who are executive officers as of the end of
the fiscal year. This deduction limitation, however, does not apply to certain “performance based”
compensation. It is the Compensation Committee’s general policy to consider whether particular
payments and awards to the named executive officers are deductible for federal income tax purposes,
along with such other factors as may be relevant in the circumstances, in establishing executive
compensation programs. Quicksilver also structures compensation in a manner intended to avoid the
incurrence of any additional tax, interest or penalties under Section 409A of the Code.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis with management of Quicksilver. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation
Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in
this proxy statement and in Quicksilver’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.
The foregoing report was submitted by the Compensation Committee and shall not be deemed to be
“soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A promulgated by the
SEC or Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
Members of the Compensation Committee
| |
|
|
W. Byron Dunn
|
|
W. Yandell Rogers, III |
Steven M. Morris
|
|
Mark J. Warner |
28
Summary Compensation Table for 2010
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of the named
executive officers.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
All Other |
|
|
| Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
| Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
($) |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
($) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
2,524,593 |
|
|
|
1,162,496 |
|
|
|
653,400 |
|
|
|
19,130 |
|
|
|
4,799,619 |
|
President and |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
2,734,398 |
|
|
|
1,152,211 |
|
|
|
706,200 |
|
|
|
21,492 |
|
|
|
5,054,301 |
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
2,458,263 |
|
|
|
988,526 |
|
|
|
904,200 |
|
|
|
24,321 |
|
|
|
4,815,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
990,019 |
|
|
|
450,001 |
|
|
|
277,695 |
|
|
|
18,299 |
|
|
|
2,066,014 |
|
Senior Vice President — |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
1,062,825 |
|
|
|
446,016 |
|
|
|
300,135 |
|
|
|
17,726 |
|
|
|
2,156,702 |
|
Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
|
|
997,707 |
|
|
|
391,858 |
|
|
|
366,818 |
|
|
|
16,676 |
|
|
|
2,088,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
2,524,593 |
|
|
|
1,162,496 |
|
|
|
653,400 |
|
|
|
34,586 |
(5) |
|
|
4,815,075 |
|
Chairman of the |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
2,734,398 |
|
|
|
1,152,211 |
|
|
|
706,200 |
|
|
|
24,718 |
|
|
|
5,057,527 |
|
Board |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
2,458,263 |
|
|
|
988,526 |
|
|
|
904,200 |
|
|
|
17,157 |
|
|
|
4,808,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
|
1,209,703 |
|
|
|
543,745 |
|
|
|
381,150 |
|
|
|
19,130 |
|
|
|
2,538,728 |
|
Executive
Vice President |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
|
1,298,608 |
|
|
|
538,937 |
|
|
|
411,950 |
|
|
|
18,786 |
|
|
|
2,653,281 |
|
— Operations |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
365,000 |
|
|
|
1,450,778 |
|
|
|
498,718 |
|
|
|
500,050 |
|
|
|
17,736 |
|
|
|
2,832,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
819,569 |
|
|
|
412,504 |
|
|
|
252,450 |
|
|
|
19,130 |
|
|
|
1,803,653 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
659,499 |
|
|
|
297,347 |
|
|
|
224,700 |
|
|
|
18,786 |
|
|
|
1,500,332 |
|
— General Counsel |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
573,236 |
|
|
|
231,540 |
|
|
|
263,725 |
|
|
|
17,736 |
|
|
|
1,361,237 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
This column reports the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 718 for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted by Quicksilver and
phantom units granted by KGS. Additional information regarding the calculation of these
amounts is included in Note 2 and Note 16 to Quicksilver’s audited financial statements
included in Quicksilver’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| |
| (2) |
|
This column reports the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 718 for options granted by Quicksilver. Additional information regarding the
calculation of these amounts is included in Note 2 and Note 16 to Quicksilver’s audited
financial statements included in Quicksilver’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| |
| (3) |
|
For 2008, 2009 and 2010, this column reports the cash portion of the bonus paid to each of
the named executive officers under the 2008 Executive Bonus Plan, the 2009 Executive Bonus
Plan and the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan in February 2009, February 2010 and March 2011,
respectively. The material terms of the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan are described under
“—Compensation Discussion and Analysis¯Overview of 2010 Compensation¯Bonuses.” |
| |
| (4) |
|
For 2010, for each of the named executive officers, the amount in this column includes
company payments of 401(k) plan matching and fixed contributions in an aggregate amount of
$17,520, life insurance premiums, accidental death and dismemberment insurance premiums and
long-term disability insurance premiums. Occasionally, at no incremental cost to Quicksilver,
a guest has accompanied a named executive officer on an aircraft leased by Quicksilver for a
business trip. |
| |
| (5) |
|
In addition to the items listed in footnote 4 above, this amount includes $15,456 of taxes
paid for Mr. Thomas Darden, related to travel by guests on an aircraft leased by Quicksilver. |
29
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2010
The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of non-equity awards under
the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan and equity awards under the 2006 Equity Plan, KGS’s 2007 Equity Plan
and the 2009 Executive Bonus Plan granted to the named executive officers in 2010. The table does
not include equity awards granted to the named executive officers in 2011 under the 2010 Executive
Bonus Plan. The 2010 Executive Bonus Plan is described under “—Compensation Discussion and
Analysis—Overview of 2010 Compensation—Bonuses.” The 2006 Equity Plan generally allows the
Compensation Committee of the Board to make Quicksilver equity grants to directors, executive
officers and selected employees and consultants of Quicksilver, and KGS’s 2007 Equity Plan
generally allowed the board of directors of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC to make KGS equity
grants to employees, consultants, officers and directors of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC and its
affiliates, including Quicksilver. The 2009 Executive Bonus Plan generally provides for awards of
cash and equity incentive bonuses to executives and other officers of Quicksilver for performance
in 2009.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Option |
|
Exercise |
|
Fair |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts |
|
Estimated Possible Payouts |
|
Number of |
|
Awards: |
|
or Base |
|
Value of |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity |
|
Under Equity |
|
Shares or |
|
Number of |
|
Price of |
|
Stock and |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards |
|
Incentive Plan Awards |
|
Units of |
|
Securities |
|
Option |
|
Option |
| |
|
Grant |
|
Approval |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Stock |
|
Underlying |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
| Name |
|
Date |
|
Date |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
Options (#) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
($)(1) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
76,279 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,211,311 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,327 |
(3) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
1,162,496 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/19/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38,182 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
807,549 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/10 |
(5) |
|
|
2/23/10 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
880,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
505,533 |
|
|
|
|
— |
(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
660,000 |
|
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
29,527 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
468,889 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44,643 |
(3) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
450,001 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/19/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,780 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
312,597 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/10 |
(5) |
|
|
2/23/10 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
181,500 |
|
|
|
363,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
208,533 |
|
|
|
|
— |
(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
280,500 |
|
|
|
561,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
76,279 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,211,311 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,327 |
(3) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
1,162,496 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/19/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38,182 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
807,549 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/10 |
(5) |
|
|
2/23/10 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
880,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
505,533 |
|
|
|
|
— |
(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
660,000 |
|
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,679 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
566,583 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
53,943 |
(3) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
543,745 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/19/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,859 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
377,718 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/10 |
(5) |
|
|
2/23/10 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
462,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
265,403 |
|
|
|
|
— |
(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
|
770,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27,067 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
429,824 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/17/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
40,923 |
(3) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
412,504 |
|
|
|
|
1/4/10 |
|
|
|
11/19/09 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,548 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
286,540 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/10 |
(5) |
|
|
2/23/10 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
103,405 |
|
|
|
|
— |
(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
This column shows the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718
for equity awards granted to the named executive officers in 2010. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Number of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units granted to the named executive
officer under the 2006 Equity Plan. Restrictions on these shares lapsed as to one third of
the shares on January 4, 2011 and will lapse as to one third of these shares on each of
January 4, 2012 and 2013. These restrictions may lapse earlier upon death, disability,
qualified retirement or a change in control (see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or in
Connection with a Change in Control”). |
30
|
|
|
| (3) |
|
Number of shares subject to stock options granted to the named executive officer under the
2006 Equity Plan. These options became exercisable with respect to one third of the shares on
January 4, 2011 and will become exercisable as to one third of these shares on each of January
4, 2012 and 2013. These options may become exercisable earlier upon death, disability,
qualified retirement or a change in control (see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or in
Connection with a Change in Control”). |
| |
| (4) |
|
Number of phantom units granted to the named executive officer under KGS’s 2007 Equity Plan,
which settled in KGS common units upon vesting. All of these phantom units vested upon the
closing of sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests in KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC
on October 1, 2010. |
| |
| (5) |
|
The 2009 Executive Bonus Plan was adopted November 24, 2008. On February 23, 2010, the
following cash amounts and numbers of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units
were granted to the named executive officers for performance in 2009: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
| Name |
|
Cash Bonus ($) |
|
of Shares (#) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
706,200 |
|
|
|
36,686 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
300,135 |
|
|
|
15,133 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
706,200 |
|
|
|
36,686 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
411,950 |
|
|
|
19,260 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
224,700 |
|
|
|
7,504 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restrictions on these shares lapsed as to one third of the shares on February 23, 2011 and
will lapse as to one third of the shares on each of February 23, 2012 and 2013. In accordance
with SEC rules, the portion of this bonus paid in cash was included in the Grants of Plan-Based
Awards in 2009 table included in Quicksilver’s proxy statement for the May 19, 2010 annual
meeting of stockholders. |
| |
| (6) |
|
The 2010 Executive Bonus Plan was adopted November 17, 2009. On March 11, 2011, the
following cash amounts and numbers of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units
were granted to the named executive officers for performance in 2010: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares or |
| Name |
|
Cash Bonus ($) |
|
Units (#) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
653,400 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
277,695 |
|
|
|
12,815 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
653,400 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
381,150 |
|
|
|
16,310 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
252,450 |
|
|
|
11,650 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
In accordance with SEC rules, the portion of this bonus paid in restricted stock or
restricted stock units is not included in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2010 table because
it is considered an equity award granted in 2011. Restrictions on these shares or units will
lapse as to one third of these shares or units on each of March 11, 2012, 2013 and 2014. |
31
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End in 2010
The following table sets forth information regarding the December 31, 2010 holdings by the
named executive officers of Quicksilver of options, restricted stock and restricted stock units.
Each equity grant is shown separately for each named executive officer.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
| |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market Value of |
| |
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or Units |
|
Shares or Units |
| |
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Option |
|
of Stock That |
|
of Stock That |
| |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Have Not Vested |
|
Have Not Vested |
| Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
($) |
|
Date |
|
(#) |
|
($)(1) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
48,227 |
|
|
|
24,113 |
(2) |
|
|
30.95 |
|
|
|
01/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,307 |
|
|
|
228,613 |
(3) |
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
01/01/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,327 |
(4) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
01/03/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,158 |
(5) |
|
|
179,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,490 |
(6) |
|
|
80,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,004 |
(7) |
|
|
1,975,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,203 |
(8) |
|
|
1,020,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,279 |
(9) |
|
|
1,124,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,686 |
(10) |
|
|
540,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
9,558 |
(2) |
|
|
30.95 |
|
|
|
01/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
88,495 |
(3) |
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
01/01/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44,643 |
(4) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
01/03/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,819 |
(5) |
|
|
71,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398 |
(6) |
|
|
35,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,872 |
(7) |
|
|
764,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,248 |
(8) |
|
|
401,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,527 |
(9) |
|
|
435,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,133 |
(10) |
|
|
223,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
48,227 |
|
|
|
24,113 |
(2) |
|
|
30.95 |
|
|
|
01/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,307 |
|
|
|
228,613 |
(3) |
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
01/01/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,327 |
(4) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
01/03/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,158 |
(5) |
|
|
179,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,490 |
(6) |
|
|
80,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,004 |
(7) |
|
|
1,975,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,203 |
(8) |
|
|
1,020,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,279 |
(9) |
|
|
1,124,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,686 |
(10) |
|
|
540,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
24,330 |
|
|
|
12,166 |
(2) |
|
|
30.95 |
|
|
|
01/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,466 |
|
|
|
106,932 |
(3) |
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
01/01/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
53,943 |
(4) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
01/03/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,295 |
(5) |
|
|
122,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,864 |
(6) |
|
|
42,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,680 |
(7) |
|
|
923,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,444 |
(8) |
|
|
507,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,679 |
(9) |
|
|
525,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,260 |
(10) |
|
|
283,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
5,648 |
(2) |
|
|
30.95 |
|
|
|
01/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,499 |
|
|
|
58,997 |
(3) |
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
01/01/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
40,923 |
(4) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
01/03/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,848 |
(5) |
|
|
41,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261 |
(6) |
|
|
18,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,582 |
(7) |
|
|
509,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,975 |
(8) |
|
|
191,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,067 |
(9) |
|
|
398,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,504 |
(10) |
|
|
110,609 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
The market value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards is based on the closing
market price of Quicksilver common stock on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of fiscal
2010, which was $14.74. |
| |
| (2) |
|
The option became exercisable with respect to all of the shares on January 2, 2011. |
32
|
|
|
| (3) |
|
The option became exercisable with respect to one half of these shares on January 2, 2011;
the option will become exercisable with respect to one half of these shares on January 2,
2012. |
| |
| (4) |
|
The option became exercisable with respect to one third of these shares on January 4, 2011;
the option will become exercisable with respect to one third of these shares on each of
January 4, 2012 and 2013. |
| |
| (5) |
|
All of these shares of restricted stock vested on January 2, 2011. |
| |
| (6) |
|
All of these shares of restricted stock vested on February 20, 2011. |
| |
| (7) |
|
One half of these shares of restricted stock vested on January 2, 2011; the remaining one
half of these shares of restricted stock will vest on January 2, 2012. |
| |
| (8) |
|
One half of these shares of restricted stock vested on February 19, 2011; the remaining one
half of these shares of restricted stock will vest on February 19, 2012. |
| |
| (9) |
|
One third of these shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units vested on January 4,
2011, and one third of these shares will vest on each of January 4, 2012 and 2013. |
| |
| (10) |
|
One third of these shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units vested on February
23, 2011, and one third of these shares will vest on each of February 23, 2012 and 2013. |
33
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010
The following table sets forth information regarding the aggregate options exercised by the
named executive officers in 2010 and Quicksilver restricted stock or restricted stock units or KGS
phantom units held by the named executive officers that became vested during 2010.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
| |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized |
| |
|
Acquired on Exercise |
|
Exercise |
|
Acquired on Vesting |
|
on Vesting |
| Name |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
Glenn Darden (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,253 |
|
|
|
2,208,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,778 |
|
|
|
3,346,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip W. Cook (2) |
|
|
44,248 |
|
|
|
266,386 |
|
|
|
57,445 |
|
|
|
861,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,679 |
|
|
|
1,299,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas F. Darden (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,253 |
|
|
|
2,208,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,778 |
|
|
|
3,346,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cook (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,054 |
|
|
|
1,065,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,578 |
|
|
|
1,581,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Cirone (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,221 |
|
|
|
558,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,550 |
|
|
|
943,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,219 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Restrictions with respect to Mr. Darden’s restricted stock lapsed on the following dates with
respect to the numbers of shares and at the market prices per share of the common stock
indicated below: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number |
|
Market |
| Date |
|
of Shares (#) |
|
Price ($) |
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
79,161 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
February 19, 2010 |
|
|
34,602 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
February 20, 2010 |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restrictions with respect to 37,511 units of Mr. Darden’s KGS phantom units, which settled
in common units, lapsed on January 4, 2010, when the market price of the common units was
$21.15; restrictions with respect to 103,267 units of Mr. Darden’s KGS phantom units, which
settled in common units, lapsed upon the closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests
in KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010, when the market price of the
common units was $24.72. Mr. Darden realized $75,559 of value upon the vesting of 3,333 KGS
phantom units, which settled in cash, on August 10, 2010, when the market price of KGS common
units was $22.67 per unit. |
| |
| (2) |
|
On May 13, 2010, Mr. Cook exercised options, at an exercise price of $6.21 per share, to
purchase 13,348 shares of common stock, when the market price of the common stock was $12.60
per share, and 30,900 shares of common stock, when the market price of the common stock was
$12.0706 per share. Restrictions with respect to Mr. Cook’s restricted stock lapsed on the
following dates with respect to the numbers of shares and at the market prices per share of
the common stock indicated below: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number |
|
Market |
| Date |
|
of Shares (#) |
|
Price ($) |
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
10,667 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
30,756 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
February 19, 2010 |
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
February 20, 2010 |
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
34
|
|
|
| |
|
Restrictions with respect to 14,613 units of Mr. Cook’s KGS phantom units, which settled
in common units, lapsed on January 4, 2010, when the market price of the common units was
$21.15; restrictions with respect to 40,066 units of Mr. Cook’s KGS phantom units, which
settled in common units, lapsed upon the closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests
in KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010, when the market price of the
common units was $24.72. Mr. Cook realized $37,791 of value upon the vesting of 1,667 KGS
phantom units, which settled in cash, on August 10, 2010, when the market price of KGS common
units was $22.67 per unit. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Restrictions with respect to Mr. Darden’s restricted stock lapsed on the following dates with
respect to the numbers of shares and at the market prices per share of the common stock
indicated below: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number |
|
Market |
| Date |
|
of Shares (#) |
|
Price ($) |
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
79,161 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
February 19, 2010 |
|
|
34,602 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
February 20, 2010 |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restrictions with respect to 37,511 units of Mr. Darden’s KGS phantom units, which settled
in common units, lapsed on January 4, 2010, when the market price of the common units was
$21.15; restrictions with respect to 103,267 units of Mr. Darden’s KGS phantom units, which
settled in common units, lapsed upon the closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests
in KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010, when the market price of the
common units was $24.72. Mr. Darden realized $75,559 of value upon the vesting of 3,333 KGS
phantom units, which settled in cash, on August 10, 2010, when the market price of KGS common
units was $22.67 per unit. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Restrictions with respect to Mr. Cook’s restricted stock lapsed on the following dates with
respect to the numbers of shares and at the market prices per share of the common stock
indicated below: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number |
|
Market |
| Date |
|
of Shares (#) |
|
Price ($) |
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
11,333 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
39,635 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
February 19, 2010 |
|
|
17,223 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
February 20, 2010 |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restrictions with respect to 17,911 units of Mr. Cook’s KGS phantom units, which settled
in common units, lapsed on January 4, 2010, when the market price of the common units was
$21.15; restrictions with respect to 48,667 units of Mr. Cook’s KGS phantom units, which
settled in common units, lapsed upon the closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests
in KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010, when the market price of the
common units was $24.72. Mr. Cook realized $37,791 of value upon the vesting of 1,667 KGS
phantom units, which settled in cash, on August 10, 2010, when the market price of KGS common
units was $22.67 per unit. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Restrictions with respect to Mr. Cirone’s restricted stock lapsed on the following dates with
respect to the numbers of shares and at the market prices per share of the common stock
indicated below: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number |
|
Market |
| Date |
|
of Shares (#) |
|
Price ($) |
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
9,333 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
20,139 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
February 19, 2010 |
|
|
6,488 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
February 20, 2010 |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restrictions with respect to 9,443 units of Mr. Cirone’s KGS phantom units, which settled
in common units, lapsed on January 4, 2010, when the market price of the common units was
$21.15; restrictions with respect to 30,107 units of Mr. Cirone’s KGS phantom units, which
settled in common units, lapsed upon the closing of the sale of all of Quicksilver’s interests
in KGS and Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC on October 1, 2010, when the market price of the
common units was $24.72. Mr. Cirone realized $30,219 of value upon the vesting of 1,333 KGS
phantom units, which settled in cash, on August 10, 2010, when the market price of KGS common
units was $22.67 per unit. |
35
Potential Payments Upon Termination or in Connection with a Change in Control
Death and Disability
Under the terms of the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan, if a named executive officer dies or becomes
disabled and unable to work during the plan year, the named executive officer, or his beneficiary,
is entitled to receive a pro-rated award based on results at the end of the performance period and
the number of calendar days that the named executive officer participated in the year prior to
death or disability. The pro-rated award will be paid at the same time and in the same manner as
awards for the plan year are paid to the other participants in the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan,
except that any equity award provided under the plan will be paid in the form of a lump sum cash
payment rather than in equity. The 2011 Executive Bonus Plan provides for the same treatment of
awards upon a named executive officer’s death or disability.
Under the terms of the equity awards granted under the 2006 Equity Plan to each of the named
executive officers, each outstanding award will immediately vest in full upon the holder’s death or
disability. Awards will convert or become exercisable or transfer restrictions will lift, as
applicable, upon vesting. Stock options that vest due to a named executive officer’s death or
disability remain exercisable for five years following such death or disability.
Retirement
Under the terms of the equity awards granted under the 2006 Equity Plan to each of the named
executive officers, each outstanding award will immediately vest in full upon the holder’s
retirement after attaining age 62 and completing five years of service with Quicksilver. Awards
will convert or become exercisable or transfer restrictions will lift, as applicable, upon vesting.
Stock options that vest due to a named executive officer’s eligible retirement remain exercisable
for five years following such retirement.
Change in Control
Under the terms of the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan, if a “change in control” of Quicksilver
occurs during the plan year, each named executive officer is entitled to receive his maximum
possible payout under the plan for the full plan year. Such payment will be made within 30 days
after the change-in-control event and any equity award provided under the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan
will be paid in the form of a lump sum cash payment rather than in equity. Pursuant to the terms
of the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan, if any payments under the plan would on their own constitute an
“excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then the payments to be
made under the 2010 Executive Bonus Plan will be reduced to the minimum extent necessary (but not
to less than zero) so that no portion of any such payment, as so reduced, constitutes an excess
parachute payment, provided that the foregoing reduction will be made only if and to the extent
that such reduction would result in an increase in the aggregate payment to be provided, determined
on an after-tax basis (taking into account any excise tax imposed pursuant to Section 4999 of the
Code, tax imposed by any comparable provision of state law and applicable federal, state and local
income and employment taxes). To the extent that any amounts payable under the 2010 Executive
Bonus Plan aggregated with all other payments made to the named executive officer upon a change in
control would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then, under the
Change in Control Plan, Quicksilver is required to make an additional payment to the named
executive officer such that after payment of all taxes on the additional payment, the named
executive officer retains an amount equal to the excise tax imposed on such individual by Section
4999 of the Code, as described below. The 2011 Executive Bonus Plan provides for the same
treatment of awards upon a change in control, except for the addition of a provision to conform the
treatment of payments in the event of a change in control under the 2011 Executive Bonus Plan with
the treatment under the Change in Control Plan.
Under the terms of the equity awards granted under the 2006 Equity Plan to each of the named
executive officers, each outstanding award will immediately vest in full upon a “change in control”
of Quicksilver that occurs while the named executive officer is an employee of Quicksilver. Awards
will convert or become exercisable or transfer restrictions will lift, as applicable, upon vesting.
Payments Upon Termination Following a Change in Control. Under the terms of the Change in
Control Plan, if, on or within two years after the occurrence of a “change in control” of
Quicksilver there is an involuntary
36
termination of a named executive officer (including termination for specified “good reason”
events), the named executive officer is entitled to the following benefits:
| |
• |
|
a lump sum cash payment on the 60th day (unless subject to the six-month payment
delay under Section 409A of the Code) following the named executive officer’s
separation from service equal to three times the sum of his (i) base salary plus (ii)
“benchmark bonus” (generally defined as the greater of (a) the average of the last
three consecutive annual bonuses earned by the named executive officer (or, all annual
bonuses earned by him if he has been employed by Quicksilver for less than three years)
or (b) the named executive officer’s target annual bonus in the year in which the
change in control occurs), subject to the execution of a general release by the named
executive officer; |
| |
| |
• |
|
accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards held by the named executive
officer; |
| |
| |
• |
|
continued group medical, dental, vision and life insurance coverage, paid by
Quicksilver, for two years following the named executive officer’s termination date,
subject to the execution of a general release by the named executive officer; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
accelerated vesting of the named executive officer’s 401(k) plan account balance, to
the extent permitted by law. |
Benefits provided pursuant to the Change in Control Plan are required to be reduced by any
severance, termination or similar payment made to the named executive officer pursuant to any
employment, change in control, severance or similar agreement with Quicksilver or a subsidiary of
Quicksilver, unless the other agreement expressly provides that such payment is in addition to
payments under the Change in Control Plan.
Retention Bonus Following a Change in Control. Under the Change in Control Plan, each of the
named executive officers who remains employed by Quicksilver throughout the six-month period
following a change in control is entitled to a lump sum cash retention bonus equal to one-half of
the named executive officer’s base salary, without regard to whether he is or ever will become
entitled to severance benefits under the Change in Control Plan.
If any payment or benefit to be paid or provided by Quicksilver or its subsidiaries under the
Change in Control Plan or otherwise would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of
the Code on “excess parachute payments,” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then
Quicksilver is required to make an additional payment to the named executive officer such that
after payment of all taxes on the additional payment (including income and employment taxes, as
well as interest and penalties), the named executive officer retains an amount equal to the excise
tax imposed on such individual by Section 4999 of the Code.
The “change in control” definitions under the 2010 and 2011 Executive Bonus Plans, the 2006
Equity Plan and the Change in Control Plan are substantially the same. “Change in control”
generally means the occurrence of one of the following events: any person is or becomes the
beneficial owner of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock
of Quicksilver, except acquisitions approved by the incumbent directors and acquisitions by
specified related persons; a majority of the board ceases to be comprised of incumbent directors;
or the consummation of a business combination transaction, including a sale of all or substantially
all assets, immediately after which the voting stock of Quicksilver outstanding immediately prior
to such transaction does not continue to represent at least 50% of the combined voting power of the
then-outstanding shares of voting stock of the surviving entity. Under the Change in Control Plan,
a “good reason” event generally means the occurrence of one of the following events with regard to
a participant: a change in duties or position; a reduction in base salary or incentive bonus
opportunity; a change in compensation or benefits without provision of comparable, or, for certain
specified benefits, the same, compensation or benefits; a relocation of workplace outside a radius
of 50 miles; failure of Quicksilver to honor any provision of the Change in Control Plan; or notice
of termination of an employment agreement.
37
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table
The following table sets forth the payments that each of the named executive officers could
receive upon the occurrence of any of the events described below. The payments set forth in the
table are based on the assumption that the event occurred on December 31, 2010, the last business
day of 2010. The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits, such as accrued
salary, accrued vacation and severance, to the extent that they are provided on a
non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-Based Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term |
|
Stock or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Retention |
|
Cash |
|
Incentive |
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
Tax |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bonus |
|
Severance |
|
Compensation |
|
Stock Units |
|
Options |
|
Premiums |
|
Gross-Up |
|
Total |
| Name |
|
Event |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
($)(5) |
|
($)(6) |
|
(7) |
|
($) |
Glenn Darden |
|
Death |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,089,000 |
|
|
|
4,920,507 |
|
|
|
1,950,069 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,959,576 |
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,089,000 |
|
|
|
4,920,507 |
|
|
|
1,950,069 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,959,576 |
|
|
|
Retirement (8) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Change in control |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
5,445,540 |
|
|
|
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
4,920,507 |
|
|
|
1,950,069 |
|
|
|
42,808 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,778,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
Death |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
457,380 |
|
|
|
1,930,896 |
|
|
|
754,862 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,143,138 |
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
457,380 |
|
|
|
1,930,896 |
|
|
|
754,862 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,143,138 |
|
|
|
Retirement (8) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Change in control |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
2,729,538 |
|
|
|
924,000 |
|
|
|
1,930,896 |
|
|
|
754,862 |
|
|
|
42,808 |
|
|
|
1,312,457 |
|
|
|
7,859,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
Death |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,089,000 |
|
|
|
4,920,507 |
|
|
|
1,950,069 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,959,576 |
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,089,000 |
|
|
|
4,920,507 |
|
|
|
1,950,069 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,959,576 |
|
|
|
Retirement (8) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Change in control |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
5,445,540 |
|
|
|
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
4,920,507 |
|
|
|
1,950,069 |
|
|
|
42,808 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,778,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cook |
|
Death |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
609,840 |
|
|
|
2,405,892 |
|
|
|
912,130 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,927,862 |
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
609,840 |
|
|
|
2,405,892 |
|
|
|
912,130 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,927,862 |
|
|
|
Retirement (8) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Change in control |
|
|
192,500 |
|
|
|
3,436,233 |
|
|
|
1,232,000 |
|
|
|
2,405,892 |
|
|
|
912,130 |
|
|
|
42,808 |
|
|
|
1,380,858 |
|
|
|
9,602,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Cirone |
|
Death |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
415,800 |
|
|
|
1,271,133 |
|
|
|
503,244 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,190,177 |
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
415,800 |
|
|
|
1,271,133 |
|
|
|
503,244 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,190,177 |
|
|
|
Retirement (8) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Change in control |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2,160,000 |
|
|
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
1,271,133 |
|
|
|
503,244 |
|
|
|
12,438 |
|
|
|
941,185 |
|
|
|
5,878,000 |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Pursuant to the Change in Control Plan, this amount is payable as a lump sum only if the
named executive officer remains employed by Quicksilver throughout the six-month period
following a change in control of Quicksilver. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Pursuant to the Change in Control Plan, this amount is payable as a lump sum only if there is
an involuntary termination of the named executive officer on or within two years after a
change in control of Quicksilver occurs. |
| |
| (3) |
|
This amount is payable as a lump sum and is calculated based on the 2010 Executive Bonus
Plan. |
| |
| (4) |
|
This amount reflects the market value, as of December 31, 2010, the last trading day of
fiscal 2010, of unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units of Quicksilver
that would vest upon the occurrence of the applicable event. The closing market price of the common stock of Quicksilver was
$14.74 on December 31, 2010. |
38
|
|
|
| |
| (5) |
|
This amount reflects the difference between $14.74, the closing price of the common stock of
Quicksilver on December 31, 2010, and the option exercise price of unvested options that would
vest upon the occurrence of the applicable event. This amount does not include any amounts
that would be realizable by the named executive officer in connection with the exercise of
options that were vested but unexercised as of December 31, 2010. For information regarding
options that were vested but unexercised as of December 31, 2010, see “—Outstanding Equity
Awards at Fiscal Year-End in 2010.” |
| |
| (6) |
|
For each named executive officer, consists of health insurance and life insurance premiums
payable under the Change in Control Plan over the two-year period following a change in
control of Quicksilver in the amounts set forth opposite his name: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Health Insurance |
|
Life Insurance |
| |
|
Premium |
|
Premium |
| Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
Glenn Darden |
|
|
41,848 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
Philip W. Cook |
|
|
41,848 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
Thomas F. Darden |
|
|
41,848 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
Jeff Cook |
|
|
41,848 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
John C. Cirone |
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
|
| (7) |
|
This amount is an estimate of the lump sum payment Quicksilver would be required to make to
the named executive officer because certain payments to the named executive officer are
subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code. |
| |
| (8) |
|
As described above under “—Retirement,” the vesting of awards granted under the 2006 Equity
Plan accelerate on retirement after attaining age 62 and completing five years of service. As
of December 31, 2010, none of the named executive officers satisfied the age and service
condition. Each of the named executive officers would first satisfy these conditions on the
date indicated: Mr. Glenn Darden — September 22, 2017; Mr. Philip Cook — November 12, 2023;
Mr. Thomas Darden — July 7, 2015; Mr. Jeff Cook — July 23, 2018; and Mr. Cirone — January
22, 2012. |
39
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Management is responsible for Quicksilver’s system of internal controls and the overall
financial reporting process. Quicksilver’s independent registered public accounting firm is
responsible for performing an independent audit of Quicksilver’s consolidated financial statements
and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and to issue reports thereon. The Audit
Committee is responsible for overseeing management’s conduct of the financial reporting process and
systems of internal accounting and financial controls.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with both management and Deloitte & Touche LLP,
Quicksilver’s independent registered public accounting firm, all annual and quarterly financial
statements prior to their issuance. Management advised the Audit Committee that each set of
financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Audit Committee.
These reviews by the Audit Committee included discussion with Deloitte & Touche LLP of matters
required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with
Audit Committees), as amended and adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,
including the quality of Quicksilver’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant
judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee also
discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP matters relating to its independence, including a review of
audit and non-audit fees and the written disclosures and letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP to the
Audit Committee pursuant to Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees). Additionally, the Audit Committee reviewed key initiatives and programs
aimed at strengthening the effectiveness of Quicksilver’s internal and disclosure control
structure, including its internal control over financial reporting.
Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, the Audit Committee recommended to
the Board that it approve the inclusion of Quicksilver’s audited financial statements in
Quicksilver’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.
The foregoing report was submitted by the Audit Committee and shall not be deemed to be
“soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A promulgated by the
SEC or Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
Members of the Audit Committee
| |
|
|
W. Byron Dunn
|
|
W. Yandell Rogers, III |
Steven M. Morris
|
|
Mark J. Warner |
40
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Audit Committee charter requires that the Audit Committee review and evaluate the
independence, performance and compensation of, and annually appoint, the independent registered
public accounting firm. The Audit Committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP, which served as
Quicksilver’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2010, to continue to serve as
Quicksilver’s independent registered public accounting firm for the first quarter of 2011. The
Audit Committee expects to receive from Deloitte a formal audit proposal for the full year prior to
the Committee’s regularly scheduled meeting in May, at which time it will consider appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP for the remainder of 2011. There are no disagreements with Deloitte & Touche
LLP on any accounting or auditing matters.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting and
will be offered the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. They will also be available
to answer questions.
The table below summarizes the fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Deloitte Entities”),
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Audit Fees (1) |
|
$ |
1,112,028 |
|
|
$ |
1,195,531 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (2) |
|
|
313,894 |
|
|
|
1,018,240 |
|
Tax Fees (3) |
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
37,641 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
These amounts consist of the aggregate fees billed by the Deloitte Entities for professional
services rendered for the audit of Quicksilver’s annual financial statements and the review of
the financial statements included in Quicksilver’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. |
| |
| (2) |
|
These amounts consist of the aggregate fees billed by the Deloitte Entities for assurance and
related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
Quicksilver’s financial statements and are not described above under “Audit Fees.” In 2010,
audit-related fees consisted of fees related to consents associated with a capital markets
transaction and consultation regarding financial accounting and reporting standards. In 2009,
audit-related fees consisted of fees related to due diligence and consents associated with
capital markets transactions and consultation regarding financial accounting and reporting
standards. |
| |
| (3) |
|
The amount for 2010 consists of fees billed by the Deloitte Entities for limited review of
Quicksilver’s 2009 federal income tax return. The amount for 2009 consists of fees billed by
the Deloitte Entities for review of Quicksilver’s 2008 federal income tax return. |
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. In general, all engagements of Quicksilver’s
independent registered public accountants, whether for auditing or non-auditing services, must be
pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Chair of the Audit Committee, Mr. Morris, is authorized
to pre-approve any audit and non-audit services on behalf of the Audit Committee, provided that
these decisions are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
None of the services described above as Audit-Related Fees were exempt from the pre-approval
requirements set forth in SEC rules and regulations.
41
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Related-Party Transaction Policy
The Board has adopted a written related-party transaction policy pursuant to which it has
delegated to the Audit Committee the responsibility for reviewing and, if appropriate, approving or
ratifying related-party transactions. The policy covers transactions to which Quicksilver or any
of its subsidiaries is a party and in which any director, director nominee or executive officer of
Quicksilver or any person that beneficially owns more than 5% of the common stock of Quicksilver
(each a “related party”), or an immediate family member of such director, nominee, officer or
owner, had, has or will have a direct or indirect interest, other than a transaction involving (i)
$120,000 or less, (ii) compensation by Quicksilver of a related party or an immediate family member
of a related party for services as a director or executive officer of Quicksilver that has been
approved by the Compensation Committee or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, (iii)
only Quicksilver and any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, (iv) only Quicksilver’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, (v) an interest of a related party or any immediate family member of such related
party that arises solely from (a) such person’s position as a director of another corporation or
organization that is a party to the transaction, (b) from the direct or indirect ownership by all
related parties and immediate family members of such related parties, in the aggregate, of less
than 10% equity interest (other than a general partner interest) in another entity which is a party
to the transaction or (c) from both such position and ownership, or (vi) an interest of a related
party, any immediate family member of such related party or any related entity of such related
party that arises solely from the ownership of Quicksilver equity securities and all holders of
that class of Quicksilver equity securities receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis. The
policy instructs directors and executive officers to bring any possible related-party transaction
to the attention of Quicksilver’s General Counsel or Compliance Officer, who, unless he or she
determines that the transaction is not a related-party transaction, will notify the Chairman of the
Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews each related-party transaction of which it becomes aware and may
approve or ratify a related-party transaction if the Audit Committee determines that the
transaction is in the best interest of Quicksilver and its stockholders. In making this
determination, the Audit Committee considers (i) whether the terms of the related-party transaction
are more or less favorable to Quicksilver than those that could be expected to be obtained from an
unrelated third party on an arm’s length basis; (ii) any provisions in Quicksilver’s financing
arrangements relating to transactions with related parties or affiliates; and (iii) any other
matters the Audit Committee deems relevant and appropriate. The Audit Committee reports
periodically to the Board on the nature of the related-party transactions that have been presented
to the Audit Committee and the determinations that the Audit Committee has made with respect to
those transactions. The Audit Committee has reviewed and approved or ratified each of the
related-party transactions discussed below other than Ms. Self’s compensation as an officer of
Quicksilver, which was reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
Related-Party Transactions
Quicksilver paid $0.6 million in 2010, and expects to pay $0.1 million in 2011, for rent on
buildings owned by Pennsylvania Avenue, L.P. (a limited partnership owned by members of the Darden
family and Mercury Exploration Company, a corporation owned by members of the Darden family) and
WFMG, L.P. (a limited partnership owned 80% by Pennsylvania Avenue and 20% by unrelated parties).
Rental rates are determined based on comparable rates charged by third parties.
Quicksilver paid $0.1 million in 2010, and expects to pay $0.1 million in 2011, to Red Oak
Realty, LLC, a limited liability company in which members of the Darden family own interests,
pursuant to a property management agreement with Red Oak.
In August 2010, Quicksilver entered into a lease of office space from Behringer Harvard
Burnett Plaza LP. In connection with the lease, Red Oak Realty, LLC received a $1.4 million
commission from Behringer Harvard.
Quicksilver received from Mercury Exploration $0.3 million in 2010, and expects to receive
from Mercury Exploration $0.1 million in 2011, for sublease and lease rentals and reimbursement for
employee insurance coverage and administrative services.
During 2010, Quicksilver paid $0.8 million to Executive Flight Services, Inc. (an unrelated
airplane management company), and Executive Flight Services paid $0.5 million to Sevens Aviation,
LLC (a limited liability
42
company owned indirectly by members of the Darden family), in connection with Quicksilver’s
use of an airplane owned by Sevens Aviation. Usage rates are determined based on comparable rates
charged by third parties. Quicksilver expects to continue to use the plane in 2011, but is unable
to predict the aggregate usage fees that it will pay.
On June 23, 2006, Quicksilver received an assignment from KC7 Ranch Ltd. of an oil and gas
lease dated October 25, 2005 from Si Bar, KC Ranch, Ltd. as lessor to KC7 Ranch Ltd. as lessee
covering 2,773 acres in exchange for $0.2 million in cash. Under the terms of the assignment of
the lease, KC7 is entitled to a 3.3% overriding royalty interest, pursuant to which KC7 will
receive payments from Quicksilver based on any future production of oil or gas from the acreage
subject to the lease. On July 7, 2006, KC7 Ranch Ltd. as lessor granted an oil and gas lease to
Quicksilver covering 2,773 acres in exchange for a cash payment of $0.3 million. The lease has a
three-year primary term and KC7 is entitled to receive a 20% royalty interest pursuant to which it
will receive payments from Quicksilver based on any future production of oil or gas from the
acreage subject to the lease. Aggregate payments to KC7 Ranch Ltd. in 2010 were $2,500. Future
payments, if any, pursuant to the royalty and overriding royalty interests cannot be estimated at
this time. KC7 is a limited partnership in which Quicksilver Energy LP, an entity controlled by
members of the Darden family, owns an 80% limited partner interest and maintains additional
preferences in distributions of profit from KC7; the other 20% limited partner interest is owned or
controlled by Jeff Cook, Quicksilver’s Executive Vice President — Operations, and his spouse and
children. KC7’s general partner is owned equally by Glenn Darden, Thomas Darden, and Anne Darden
Self. The purchase price to acquire the leases and the terms of the leases were determined based
on comparable prices and terms paid and granted to third parties with respect to similar leases in
the area. The approximate 80% net revenue interest that Quicksilver has in these leases after
deducting the royalty and, as applicable, overriding royalty is commensurate with that which
Quicksilver has with respect to other leases in the area.
For her service during 2010 as Quicksilver’s Vice President — Human Resources, Anne Darden
Self received total compensation (calculated in the same manner as total compensation in the
Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement) of $749,032. Ms. Self continues to serve as
Vice President — Human Resources, and Quicksilver anticipates her total compensation for 2011 will
not be less than that she received in 2010.
For his service during 2010 as a landman for Quicksilver, Byron Dunn received total
compensation (calculated in the same manner as total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table
in this proxy statement) of $205,567. Mr. Dunn continues to be employed as a landman, and
Quicksilver anticipates his total compensation for 2011 will not be less than that he received in
2010. Mr. Dunn is the son of Quicksilver’s director W. Byron Dunn. W. Byron Dunn has no material
direct or indirect interest in his son’s compensation.
For her service during 2010 as Human Resources Director for Quicksilver, Rena Mundy received
total compensation (calculated in the same manner as total compensation in the Summary Compensation
Table in this proxy statement) of $344,800. Ms. Mundy continues to be employed as Human Resources
Director, and Quicksilver anticipates her total compensation for 2011 will not be less than that
she received in 2010. Ms. Mundy is the spouse of Quicksilver’s Vice President — Engineering,
Chris M. Mundy.
43
PROPOSAL 1.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The following nominees have been selected by the NCG Committee and approved by the Board for
submission to the stockholders, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of
Quicksilver’s stockholders in 2014:
| |
• |
|
Thomas F. Darden; |
| |
| |
• |
|
W. Byron Dunn; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
Mark J. Warner. |
The Board believes that each director nominee will be able to stand for election. If any
nominee becomes unable to stand for election, proxies in favor of that nominee will be voted in
favor of the remaining nominees and in favor of any substitute nominee named by the Board upon
recommendation of the NCG Committee. If you do not wish your shares voted for one or more of the
nominees, you may so indicate when you vote.
Your Board recommends a vote “FOR” the above nominees.
PROPOSAL 2.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Pursuant to recent amendments to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Quicksilver is providing its stockholders with an opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory
(non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy
statement in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Accordingly, Quicksilver will ask stockholders
to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the annual meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Quicksilver Resources Inc. (the “Company”) approve,
on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the
Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the
compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2010 Summary Compensation Table and the other
related tables and disclosure.”
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the compensation programs for Quicksilver’s named
executive officers to ensure that they achieve the desired goals of aligning the interests of
executive management with stockholders, attracting, retaining and motivating high-quality executive
officers and creating long-term value. We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section of this proxy statement, which describes how the executive compensation program
reflects Quicksilver’s compensation philosophy and objectives and the decisions made by the
Compensation Committee for 2010 and 2011 in detail.
Quicksilver is asking stockholders to indicate their support for the named executive officer
compensation described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay”
proposal, gives Quicksilver’s stockholders the opportunity to express their views on Quicksilver’s
named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of
compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the named executive officers and the
philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.
44
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on Quicksilver, the Compensation
Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing
and administering Quicksilver’s executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by
stockholders in their vote on this proposal and to the extent there is any significant vote against
the executive compensation program as disclosed in this proxy statement, will consider
stockholders’ concerns and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those
concerns.
Your Board recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 2.
PROPOSAL 3.
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Quicksilver is also providing
its stockholders with an opportunity to indicate how frequently Quicksilver should seek an advisory
vote on the compensation of named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s
compensation disclosure rules, such as Proposal 2 included in this proxy statement. By voting on
this Proposal 3, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named
executive officer compensation once every one, two or three years.
After careful consideration of this Proposal 3, the Board has determined that an advisory vote
on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative, and therefore
recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.
In formulating its recommendation, the Board considered that an annual advisory vote on executive
compensation will allow stockholders to provide direct input on Quicksilver’s compensation
philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year. You may cast
your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of every one year, every two
years, every three years or abstain from voting when you vote in response to the resolution set
forth below.
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company determine, on an advisory basis, that
the frequency with which the stockholders of the Company shall have an advisory vote on the
compensation of the Company’s named executive officers set forth in the Company’s proxy
statement pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules
is:
Choice 1 — every one year;
Choice 2 — every two years;
Choice 3 — every three years; or
Choice 4 — abstain from voting.”
The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes
cast by stockholders will be deemed by Quicksilver to be the choice of the frequency for the
advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by stockholders. Although this
advisory vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board will take into account the
outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive
compensation.
Your Board recommends a vote for the option of “EVERY ONE YEAR” as the frequency with which
stockholders are provided an advisory vote on executive compensation.
45
OTHER MATTERS
The Board does not know of any other matters that are to be presented for action at the annual
meeting. If, however, any other matters properly come before the annual meeting or any
adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof, it is intended that the enclosed proxy will be voted in
accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxy.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholder Proposals for Annual Meeting in 2012
Any stockholder who satisfies the SEC requirements and desires to submit a proposal to be
considered for inclusion in Quicksilver’s proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders to
be held in 2012 must submit the proposal to Quicksilver’s Secretary at 801 Cherry Street, Suite
3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. The proposal must be received no later than December 8,
2011 for Quicksilver to consider it for inclusion.
Other Stockholder Business at Annual Meeting in 2012
Stockholders who desire to present other business at the annual meeting of stockholders to be
held in 2012, including a nomination of a candidate for election as director at such meeting, must
notify Quicksilver’s Secretary of such intent in accordance with Quicksilver’s Bylaws by writing to
Quicksilver’s Secretary at 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. To be
timely, such notice must be received no earlier than February 18, 2012 and no later than March 19,
2012. The advance notice must also meet the other requirements of Bylaw 9 (in the case of business
other than nominations) or Bylaw 14 (in the case of nominations) of Quicksilver’s Bylaws. You may
obtain a copy of Quicksilver’s Bylaws by writing to Quicksilver’s Secretary at the address above.
The above Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and this proxy statement are sent by order
of the Board.
John C. Cirone
Senior Vice President — General Counsel
April 6, 2011
Copies of Quicksilver’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available, without charge, to each
stockholder upon written request to the Investor Relations Department at 801 Cherry Street, Suite
3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 (a copy of any exhibit to the Form 10-K will also be
provided without charge upon written request).
46
YOUR VOTE IS
IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.
We encourage you
to take advantage of Internet or telephone voting.
Both are available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week.
Internet and
telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day prior to the
stockholder meeting date.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.proxyvoting.com/kwk |
|
| |
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your
proxy card in hand when you access the web
site.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TELEPHONE
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-866-540-5760 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your
proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you
call.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by
telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your
proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes
the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked,
signed and returned your proxy card.
|
|
97466
6 FOLD
AND DETACH HERE 6
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please
mark your votes as
|
|
x |
|
|
|
indicated
in this example
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
FOR ALL |
|
WITHHOLD FOR ALL |
|
*EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees: 01 Thomas F. Darden
02 W. Byron Dunn 03 Mark J. Warner
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
Proposal
2. |
ADVISORY
VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
2 years
|
|
3 years
|
|
ABSTAIN |
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee,
mark the “Exceptions” box above and write that
nominee’s name in the space provided below.)
|
|
Proposal
3. |
ADVISORY
VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF HOLDING AN ADVISORY VOTE ON
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *Exceptions
|
|
|
All shares will be voted as directed herein and, unless otherwise directed, will be voted “For” the nominees listed in
proposal 1, “For” proposal 2, for “1 year” on proposal 3 and
in accordance with the discretion of the person voting the
proxy with respect to any other business properly brought
before the annual meeting. You may revoke this proxy at any
time prior to the time this proxy is voted.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please check the following
box if you plan to attend the
annual meeting in person.
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Here for Address Change or
Comments SEE REVERSE
|
|
o |
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. In
the case of a corporation, partnership or other entity, the full name of the organization
should be used and the signature should be that of a duly authorized officer or person.
You can now access your Quicksilver Resources Inc. account online.
Access your Quicksilver Resources Inc. account online via Investor ServiceDirect®
(ISD).
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, the transfer agent for Quicksilver Resources Inc., now makes it
easy and convenient to get current information on your stockholder account.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• View account status |
|
• View payment history for
dividends |
|
|
|
• View certificate history |
|
• Make address changes |
|
|
|
• View book-entry information |
|
• Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form |
Visit us on the web at http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess
For Technical Assistance
Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
Investor ServiceDirect
®
Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163
Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the annual meeting of
stockholders. The Proxy Statement and the 2010 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at:
http://www.proxydocs.com/kwk
6FOLD AND DETACH HERE 6
PROXY
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
801
CHERRY STREET, SUITE 3700, UNIT 19, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Quicksilver
Resources Inc.
for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May
18, 2011.
The undersigned hereby appoints Philip W. Cook and John C. Cirone and each of them as proxies,
each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to vote all
shares of Quicksilver Resources Inc. common stock which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at
the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Wednesday, May
18, 2011 at the Fort Worth Club, 306 West Seventh Street, 12th floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, or
at any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon the matters set forth on the reverse side and
described in the accompanying proxy statement and upon such other business as may properly come
before the annual meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted “For” the nominees listed in
proposal 1, “For” proposal 2, for “1 year” on proposal 3 and in accordance with the discretion of
the person voting the proxy with respect to any other business properly brought before the annual
meeting.
Address
Change/Comments
(Mark the corresponding box on the
reverse side)
BNY MELLON SHAREOWNER
SERVICES
P.O. BOX
3550
SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ
07606-9250
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
97466