Please wait

LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION
12300 LIBERTY BOULEVARD
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112

February 6, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn: Larry Spirgel, Assistant Director

Re:   Liberty Media Corporation (the "Company")
Schedule 14A—Amendment No. 2 (File No. 001-16615)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        We have electronically filed, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), the Company's Form S-4 Registration Statement (the "Registration Statement") containing Amendment No. 2 ("Amendment No. 2") to our preliminary proxy statement, which was originally filed on December 16, 2005 ("Original Filing") and amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed on January 20, 2006 (as so amended, the "Preliminary Proxy Statement"). Please be advised that the filing fee prescribed by Section 6(b) of the Securities Act with respect to the Registration Statement was paid with the Original Filing. Courtesy copies in paper form of Amendment No. 2 (marked to show changes), the Registration Statement and this letter are being delivered to you and the other members of the Staff listed on the last page of this letter.

        Set forth below are our responses to the comments contained in your letter to us, dated January 30, 2006 (the "SEC Letter"), regarding the Preliminary Proxy Statement and the other filings identified in your letter. The numbered paragraphs below correspond to the numbered paragraphs of the SEC Letter.

General

1.
Comment: We note your response to our prior comment one. The September 2004 Supplement does not limit unbundling concerns to changes in corporate-governance and control-related provisions, which concerns are offered in the Supplement as only examples. In addition, considering our discussion in the Supplement under "Applying the Unbundling Rule When a New Acquisition Vehicle Is Used" and that you have created New Liberty "solely for purposes of effecting the restructuring," it appears that you have in substance created provisions for your stockholders that were not previously part of your charter, which implicates the first bulleted point in the Supplement. As a result, please address in your response letter any immateriality, for unbundling purposes, of particular provisions with new concepts for your stockholders, such as the provisions concerning redemption and sale of all or substantially all of the assets of a group. As part of your analysis, tell us how you considered any stockholder voting requirements under Delaware law, for example, regarding the asset sale provision and how you considered the importance an investor would attach to the redemption or asset sale provision in making an investment decision.

Risk Factors, page 15

If New Liberty's board of directors causes a separation of either group from New Liberty…, page 15

2.
Comment: We note that approval of the proposals would give the board the power to sell the assets of either group and then redeem a number of shares of the group for cash. In such a

The Restructuring Proposals, page 36

The Restructuring, page 37

3.
Comment: We note your response to prior comment 25. Although you have clarified the types of businesses and assets that will be attributed to both groups, it is not clear what you mean by "non-strategic assets" that will be attributed to your Capital Group. Please clarify the differences between the "non-strategic assets" and "operating assets" or "strategic assets" of the Capital Group (bottom of page 39).


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10. Income Taxes, page B-1-56

4.
Comment: We continue to evaluate your response to prior comment 51.

Notes to Historical Attributed Financial Information, page B-2-13

5.
Comment: Refer to your response to prior comment 45. Please expand further the footnotes to the historical attributed financial information to show explicitly how management and the board have allocated and attributed revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and cash flows. You should include disclosures similar to the disclosures on pages 38, 40, 46-49 in the front part of the document. In this regard we refer you to "Recommended approach to disclosure about targeted stock" included in http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/ cfactfaq.htm.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations, page B-3-36

6.
Comment: We note your response to prior comment 50. Please confirm that you will recognize the loss when incurred. Specifically, clarify to us that you will not recognize the loss ratably over the contract period.

* * *

        As previously discussed with Cheryl Grant of your office, we hope to submit the reclassification proposal (as described in Amendment No. 2) to a vote of our stockholders at a special meeting to be held in mid-March. To meet this timing, we must mail the definitive proxy statement prior to February 14, 2006 (the date on which the financial statements included in Amendment No. 2 become stale). Accordingly, we would appreciate the Staff's assistance in completing the review process prior to Thursday, February 9, 2006, if possible.

        If you have any questions with respect to the foregoing responses to the SEC Letter or require further information, please contact the undersigned at (720) 875-5440 or Robert W. Murray Jr. or Renee L. Wilm of Baker Botts at (212) 408-2540 or (212) 408-2503, respectively.

        Very truly yours,
        Liberty Media Corporation

 

 

 

 

By:

 

/s/ Charles Y. Tanabe

        Name:   Charles Y. Tanabe
        Title:   Senior Vice President,
Secretary and General Counsel

cc:

 

Securities and Exchange Commission
Cheryl Grant, Staff Attorney
Ivette Leon, Assistant Chief Accountant
Nasreen Mohammed, Staff Accountant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Robert W. Murray Jr.
Renee L. Wilm