Please wait
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
| |
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials
|
|
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
HARRIS INTERACTIVE, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
| þ |
No fee required.
|
| |
| o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
| (1) |
Title of each class of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
| (2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
| (3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of
transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
| (4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
| o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
| |
| o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
| (1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
| (2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
60 Corporate Woods
Rochester, New York 14623
September 12, 2007
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Harris Interactive Inc., which will be held on
Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at the Memorial Art Gallery, 500
University Avenue, Rochester, New York 14607 at 5:15 p.m.
(local time).
At the Annual Meeting you will be asked to elect three directors
to our Board of Directors, to approve our 2007 Long Term
Incentive Plan, to approve our 2007 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and to ratify the selection of our independent registered
public accounting firm.
On the following pages, you will find the formal Notice of
Annual Meeting and our Proxy Statement. Included with our Proxy
Statement is a copy of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. We encourage you
to read the Proxy Statement as well as our
Form 10-K.
These documents will provide you with information about our
management, operations, markets and services, as well as our
audited financial statements.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please
register your vote as soon as possible to ensure that your
shares of Harris Interactive common stock will be represented at
the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to take advantage of the
option to vote by telephone or the Internet. If you prefer, you
may complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card
in the enclosed postage paid envelope.
We hope that many of you will be able to attend the Annual
Meeting in person. We look forward to seeing you there.
Sincerely,
Gregory T. Novak
President and Chief Executive Officer
George Bell
Chairman
60 Corporate Woods
Rochester, New York 14623
Notice of Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held October 30,
2007
To Our
Stockholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Harris Interactive Inc. (“Harris
Interactive” or the “Company”), which will be
held at the Memorial Art Gallery, 500 University Avenue,
Rochester, New York 14607, on October 30, 2007 at
5:15 p.m., (local time), for the following purposes:
1. To elect three (3) Class II directors to the
Board of Directors to hold office for a three year term;
2. To approve our 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan;
3. To approve our 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
4. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal
2008; and
5. To act upon such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
A copy of Harris Interactive’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 is enclosed with
this Notice of Annual Meeting and attached Proxy Statement. For
ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of the
stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be
available for examination by any stockholder of record for any
purpose germane to the Annual Meeting during ordinary business
hours at Harris Interactive’s offices at 60 Corporate
Woods, Rochester, New York 14623. The list also will be
available at the Annual Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Ronald E. Salluzzo
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary
September 12, 2007
Rochester, New York
IMPORTANT: To assure that your shares are represented at the
Annual Meeting, you must complete your proxy as soon as
possible. You may vote your shares by telephone at
1-800-690-6903
or via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com by following the
enclosed instruction form. If you prefer, you may fill in, date,
sign and promptly mail the enclosed proxy card in the
accompanying postage paid envelope. If you attend the Annual
Meeting, you may choose to vote in person even if you have
previously sent in your proxy card.
Stockholders should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully
prior to returning their proxies.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
i
60 Corporate Woods
Rochester, New York 14623
PROXY
STATEMENT
September 12, 2007
FOR ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
To Be Held October 30, 2007
The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
(the “Board”) of Harris Interactive Inc. (“Harris
Interactive” or the “Company”) for use at the
2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday,
October 30, 2007, at 5:15 p.m. (local time) or any
adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will
be held at the Memorial Art Gallery, 500 University Avenue,
Rochester, New York 14607. The date of this Proxy Statement is
September 12, 2007. The approximate date on which this
Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy were first
sent or given to stockholders is September 21, 2007.
Record Date;
Voting Securities
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
September 4, 2007 are entitled to vote their shares of
Harris Interactive common stock at the meeting and any
adjournment thereof. As of September 4, 2007, there were
53,108,611 shares of Harris Interactive’s common stock
issued and outstanding. Each holder of shares of common stock is
entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held.
Stockholders may vote in person or by proxy.
Voting Your
Proxy
To ensure that your vote is recorded promptly, please vote as
soon as possible, even if you intend to attend the annual
meeting in person. You may grant a proxy to vote your shares via
Internet, telephone, or mail as more fully described below:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
By Internet: Go to www.proxyvote.com as
described in the instructions accompanying this Proxy Statement.
You will need your proxy card or electronic delivery notice to
cast your vote.
|
| |
| |
•
|
By Telephone: Call
1-800-690-6903
and follow the voice prompts. You will need your proxy card or
electronic delivery notice to cast your vote.
|
| |
| |
•
|
By Mail: Mark your vote, sign your name
exactly as it appears on your proxy card, date your card, and
return it in the envelope provided.
|
If you properly submit a proxy without giving specific voting
instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the
recommendations of the Board FOR
|
|
|
| |
•
|
all nominees for director;
|
| |
| |
•
|
approval of the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2007
Incentive Plan”);
|
1
|
|
|
| |
•
|
approval of the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
“2007 Purchase Plan”); and
|
| |
| |
•
|
ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
|
If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for
a vote at the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted by the
proxy holders in accordance with the recommendation of the
Board, or, in the absence of any such recommendation, in
accordance with their best judgment. Such persons also have
discretionary authority to vote to adjourn the Annual Meeting.
Revoking Your
Proxy
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
sending a written notice of revocation to Harris Interactive
Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 60 Corporate Woods,
Rochester, New York 14623;
|
| |
| |
•
|
submitting a later dated proxy by mail, telephone, or the
Internet; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
|
Quorum
A majority of the shares of Harris Interactive common stock
entitled to vote must be present either in person or by proxy at
the Annual Meeting before any business may be conducted.
Tabulation of
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the number
of shares present for purposes of determining whether a quorum
is present at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will also be
counted as shares “present” and “entitled to
vote.” A broker non-vote occurs when a broker has not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the
shares and the broker does not have the authority to vote the
shares because the proposal is non-routine. Broker non-votes are
not counted as shares “entitled to vote” with respect
to proposals over which they do not have discretionary
authority. Therefore, while broker non-votes are considered
“present” for purposes of determining whether there is
a quorum, they are not considered “present” for
purposes of determining the majority of shares at the meeting
and entitled to vote on a particular action.
Shares Held in
Street Name
If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another
nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of
those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to
direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares, and your
broker or nominee is required to vote your shares in accordance
with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your
broker or nominee, then your broker or nominee will be entitled
to vote your shares in its discretion as to the Election of
Directors and ratification of the selection of our independent
registered public accounting firm, but will not be entitled to
vote your shares as to the proposals to approve the 2007
Incentive Plan and the 2007 Purchase Plan.
As the beneficial owner of shares, you are invited to attend the
Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if you are a
beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares in person at the
Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from
your broker or nominee that holds your shares.
Electronic
Delivery
We can reduce our expenses if you elect to receive your annual
reports and proxy materials via the Internet. If you request,
you can receive email notifications when these documents are
available electronically on the Internet. You may sign up for
this service at www.proxyvote.com.
2
Householding
Unless we have received contrary instructions, we send a single
copy of the annual report, proxy statement and notice of annual
or special meeting to any household at which two or more
stockholders reside if we believe the stockholders are members
of the same family. Each stockholder in the household will
continue to receive a separate proxy card. This process, known
as “householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate
information received at your household and helps us reduce our
expense. The Company will deliver promptly, upon written or oral
request, a separate copy of the annual report and proxy
statement to any stockholder sharing an address to which a
single copy of the documents was delivered. You may request such
separate copies, or request that separate copies of the annual
report, proxy statement, or Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials, be delivered in the future, by sending written
notice to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Householding
Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, or
by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061. Stockholders
sharing an address can request delivery of a single copy of the
annual report, proxy statement, or Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials if they are receiving multiple
copies by notice to the same address or calling the same
telephone number.
Solicitation of
Proxies
Harris Interactive will bear all costs of this proxy
solicitation. In addition to soliciting stockholders by mail and
through its regular employees, Harris Interactive will request
banks and brokers, other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to
solicit their customers who have shares of Harris Interactive
common stock registered in their names and will reimburse them
for their reasonable, out-of-pocket costs. Harris Interactive
may use the services of its officers, directors and others to
solicit proxies, personally or by telephone, facsimile or
electronic mail, without additional compensation.
STOCK
OWNERSHIP AND REPORTING
Certain
Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of Harris Interactive common stock as of
September 4, 2007 by each person or entity who is known by
the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding
shares of the Company’s common stock. This table is based
on information provided to us or filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) by our principal
stockholders.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
Percent of
Common
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Stock
Beneficially
|
|
|
Name and
Address
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company LLP
|
|
|
5,778,500
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
75 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
|
|
|
5,123,917
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
1299 Ocean Avenue,
11th Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financiere de Sainte-Marine
|
|
|
4,350,589
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
31/32 quai de Dion Bouton
92800 Puteaux, France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The percentage of shares beneficially owned is based on the
53,108,611 shares of Harris Interactive common stock
outstanding as of September 4, 2007. Beneficial ownership
is determined in accordance with rules of the SEC and generally
includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. |
3
Directors
And Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of Harris Interactive common stock as of
September 4, 2007 by (i) each director and
director-nominee, (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and each other executive officer named in the
Summary Compensation Table, and (iii) all directors and
executive officers as a group. All shares are subject to the
named person’s sole voting and investment power except
where otherwise indicated. This table is based on information
provided to us or filed with the SEC by our directors and
executive officers.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
Total
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Issuable Upon
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Name of
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
Owned(1)(6)
|
|
Owned(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
Mr. Gregory T. Novak(3)
|
|
|
68,226
|
|
|
|
857,480
|
|
|
|
925,706
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
Mr. Leonard R. Bayer(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,788,567
|
|
|
|
39,479
|
|
|
|
1,828,046
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
Mr. Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
21,763
|
|
|
|
138,542
|
|
|
|
160,305
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. David B. Vaden
|
|
|
147,681
|
|
|
|
291,771
|
|
|
|
406,202
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Dr. George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
57,170
|
|
|
|
292,188
|
|
|
|
349,358
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. George Bell(3)
|
|
|
21,704
|
|
|
|
40,917
|
|
|
|
62,621
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. David Brodsky(3)
|
|
|
194,049
|
|
|
|
29,583
|
|
|
|
223,632
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. Stephen D. Harlan(3)
|
|
|
34,204
|
|
|
|
44,306
|
|
|
|
78,510
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. James R. Riedman(3)(5)
|
|
|
153,762
|
|
|
|
85,176
|
|
|
|
238,938
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Dr. Subrata K. Sen(3)
|
|
|
29,204
|
|
|
|
39,444
|
|
|
|
68,648
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. Howard L. Shecter(3)
|
|
|
124,704
|
|
|
|
39,306
|
|
|
|
164,010
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mr. Antoine G. Treuille(3)
|
|
|
24,204
|
|
|
|
29,583
|
|
|
|
53,787
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
All directors and current
executive officers as a group (18 persons)(7)
|
|
|
2,797,024
|
|
|
|
2,194,088
|
|
|
|
5,014,449
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
| |
|
(1) |
|
Reflects common shares that may be purchased upon the exercise
of stock options that were exercisable as of September 4,
2007 or that will become exercisable on or before
November 3, 2007. Such shares are deemed to be outstanding
and beneficially owned only for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of the specific individual and not for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
The percentage of shares outstanding is based on
53,108,611 shares of Harris Interactive common stock
outstanding as of September 4, 2007, except as noted in
footnote (1) above. Beneficial ownership is determined in
accordance with rules of the SEC and generally includes voting
or investment power with respect to securities. |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Director. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 318,997 shares held by Lorraine W. Bayer,
Mr. Bayer’s wife. |
| |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 129,558 shares of common stock held by Riedman
Corporation, of which Mr. Riedman is the former President
and is currently a director and shareholder. |
| |
|
(6) |
|
No shares held by any of the persons shown are pledged as
security. |
| |
|
(7) |
|
Includes executive officers of Harris Interactive who are not
identified in the table above. |
4
Equity
Compensation Plan Table
The following table provides information as of June 30,
2007 with respect to shares of common stock that may be issued
under the terms of the Company’s equity compensation plans,
including the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan, adopted
in 1999, as amended (the “1999 Incentive Plan”):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance
Under
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
of
|
|
|
(Excluding
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding
Options,
|
|
|
Reflected in
Column
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants and
Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and
Rights
|
|
|
(a))
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by stockholders(1)
|
|
|
5,046,757
|
|
|
$
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
851,774
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by stockholders(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,546,757
|
|
|
$
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
851,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes outstanding options for 29,616 shares at a
weighted average price of $2.04 per share. These options were
assumed in connection with the acquisition of Total Research
Corporation. No additional awards can be granted under the plan
pursuant to which these options were originally issued. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Represents (a) 150,000 options issued in fiscal 2004 and
fiscal 2005 to certain employees hired in connection with the
acquisition of Novatris, S.A., and (b) 350,000 options
issued in fiscal 2006 in connection with the hiring of the
Company’s current Chief Financial Officer, Ronald E.
Salluzzo, all of which options were awarded pursuant to
individual arrangements and not under the Company’s 1999
Incentive Plan. |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Except as described in footnotes (4) and (5), all of the
options have terms, including vesting and exercise provisions,
generally consistent with options issued under the
Company’s 1999 Incentive Plan. The options were issued at
fair market value on the date of issuance. With respect to
employee stock options, 25% of each respective grant is vested
one year after the date of issuance, and 1/48th of each grant is
vested each month thereafter. With respect to director stock
options,
1/36th
of each grant made after July 1, 2005 is vested each month
after the date of issuance. All vesting of options ceases upon
termination of an individual’s employment or service as a
director, and all options vest immediately upon a change in
control of the Company during the term of the holder’s
employment or service as a director. The options are generally
not transferable. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
The options granted to former employees of Novatris, S.A. during
fiscal 2004 have an exercise price of $8.55. The options granted
to former employees of Novatris, S.A. during fiscal 2005 have an
exercise price of $4.98 and were for a ten year term; provided,
however, they must be exercised on or before the date of
termination of employment of the respective holders. The options
fully vest upon the holder’s death or disability. The
shares issuable upon exercise of these options were registered
by the Company on
Form S-8
filed with the SEC on March 8, 2004. |
| |
|
(5) |
|
The options granted to Ronald E. Salluzzo have an exercise price
of $5.56, fully vest upon his death or disability if such event
occurs one year or more after the grant date, and were for a ten
year term, provided, however, they must be exercised within
three months after termination of his employment with the
Company or one year after his death or disability. The shares
issuable upon exercise of these options were registered by the
Company on
Form S-8
filed with the SEC on June 30, 2006. |
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Securities Exchange Act”), and related
SEC regulations, require the Company’s directors and
executive officers, and persons who
5
own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s
equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership of those securities with the SEC, and to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based solely upon review of the copies of such reports furnished
to the Company and written representations that no other reports
were required, the Company believes that during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2007, all filing requirements under
Section 16(a) applicable to its executive officers,
directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied
with, except for one filing of a Form 4 for Dee Allsop,
President, U.S. Solutions Research Groups, with respect to
one disposition of stock of the Company on September 7,
2006, which filing was late by one business day.
Directors
and Committee Membership
The current members of the Board and each of its standing
committees are set forth in the following table. The standing
committees include an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee,
a Nominating and Governance Committee and a Research and
Development Committee.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Research and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Independent(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Bell(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
David Brodsky
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Stephen D. Harlan(3)
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Riedman
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Subrata K. Sen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Howard L. Shecter(4)
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Antoine G. Treuille
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Number of meetings held
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
“C” |
|
Signifies committee chairman |
| |
|
“M” |
|
Signifies committee member |
| |
|
“X” |
|
Signifies an independent director as described in “Director
Independence” below |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See “Director Independence” below for applicable
definitions |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Board chairman |
| |
|
(3) |
|
The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Harlan is an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item
407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Lead Director |
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines
(“Guidelines”) which are posted at the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate
Governance — “section of the Company’s
website located at www.harrisinteractive.com. The
Guidelines require that independent directors constitute a
substantial majority of the Board, and that all members of the
Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees be
independent. The Guidelines provide that a director is
independent when the director is free from any relationship that
would interfere with his or her exercise of independent business
judgment,
6
and who is “independent” under the standards for
independence of the Nasdaq Stock Exchange and applicable law.
The Nominating and Governance Committee, based upon its review
of responses to questionnaires inquiring about transactions,
relationships and arrangements of directors and family members
with the Company, recommended to the Board, and the Board
determined, that seven of the nine directors currently serving
are independent under the Guidelines and as defined under Nasdaq
Rule 4200(a)(15). Directors found to be independent are
designated as such in the “Directors and Committee
Membership” table above. Dr. Richard B. Wirthlin, who
served as a director until he retired effective January 31,
2007, was not an independent director because he received
compensation as an employee of the Company during applicable
periods.
All members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and
Governance Committees are among the directors found by the Board
to be independent. In addition, the requirements for
independence contained in Nasdaq Rule 4350(d) require that
members of the Audit Committee meet the criteria for
independence set forth in
Rule 10A-3(b)(1)
promulgated by the SEC. The Board has determined that all
members of the Audit Committee meet this criteria. The Board
also has found that all members of the Compensation Committee
fall within the “outside director” standard for
purposes of Rule 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “IRC”).
Board
and Committee Meetings
The Board held a total of ten meetings during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2007, and took three actions by written
consent. The independent directors, identified below, met
separately in executive session in accordance with Nasdaq
Rule 4350(c) five times during fiscal 2007. The number of
meetings held by each Committee is identified above in the table
in “Directors and Committee Membership.” During the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, each director attended at
least 75% of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of
meetings of the Board of Directors (held during the period for
which he was a director) and (ii) the total number of
meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on
which he served (held during the periods that he served).
Director
Attendance at Annual Meetings
In September 2007, the Board of Directors adopted a policy
requiring directors to attend the Annual Meeting absent
compelling circumstances preventing such attendance. Nine of the
ten directors then serving attended the 2006 Annual Meeting.
Membership
The current members of the Audit Committee are identified in the
“Directors and Committee Membership” table above. The
Board of Directors has determined that Stephen D. Harlan, the
Committee Chairman, is an “audit committee financial
expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K.
Scope and
Authority
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (a) monitors
the integrity of the accounting policies, financial reporting,
and disclosure practices of the Company, (b) reviews the
results of the Company’s quarterly and annual financial
statements and annual audit and recommends to the Board approval
of their inclusion in the Company’s quarterly and annual
reports, (c) appoints and monitors the independence and
performance of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm, (d) approves the compensation of the
independent registered public accounting firm and approves in
advance all permitted non-audit services to be provided by the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm,
(e) meets with the Company’s independent registered
public accounting firm to review the Company’s critical
7
accounting policies, internal controls, and financial management
practices, (f) monitors the processes established and
maintained by management in order for management to assure that
an adequate system of internal accounting and financial control
is functioning within the Company, (g) monitors the
processes established by management in order for management to
assure corporate compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, and (h) monitors the processes established
and maintained by management for measuring, managing, and
monitoring areas of enterprise risk designated by the Board.
This Committee also receives, reviews and takes action with
respect to complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters.
Audit Committee
Charter
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by
the Board. A copy of the Company’s Audit Committee Charter
is available in the “Investor Relations” —
“Corporate Governance — Committees” section
in the section of the Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com. In August 2007, the Audit
Committee conducted a review of its compliance with the Audit
Committee Charter and determined that it has operated in
compliance with the Charter’s provisions.
Audit
Committee’s Role in Connection with the Financial
Statements and Controls of the Company
Management of the Company has primary responsibility for the
Company’s financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered
public accounting firm has responsibility for the integrated
audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting. The responsibility of the
Audit Committee is to oversee financial and control matters,
among its other duties as specified in the Audit Committee
Charter. The Audit Committee is responsible for retention and
approval of compensation of the independent registered public
accounting firm, and pre-approval of the permitted non-audit
services to be provided by such firm. The Audit Committee meets
regularly with the independent registered public accounting
firm, without the presence of management, to ensure candid and
constructive discussions about the Company’s compliance
with accounting standards and best practices among public
companies comparable in size and scope to Harris Interactive.
The Audit Committee also reviews with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm material
developments in accounting that may be pertinent to the
Company’s financial reporting practices.
Conduct of Audit
Committee Meetings
The Audit Committee met with representatives of Pricewaterhouse
Coopers, LLP (“PwC”), the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm, at five of its six meetings
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The Audit
Committee’s agenda was established by its chairperson and
the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The meetings were
designed to facilitate and encourage communication among members
of the Audit Committee and management.
At each meeting, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed
various financial and regulatory issues, reviewed and discussed
reports regarding internal audit matters, and received a summary
of complaints received through the Company’s anonymous
complaint procedure with respect to internal accounting controls
or auditing matters. The Audit Committee reviewed policies and
procedures from time to time, including among others the
Company’s Internal Disclosure Controls Procedures and the
Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Party
Transactions. The Audit Committee also periodically had separate
executive sessions with representatives of PwC, representatives
of Ernst & Young, which provides internal audit
services to the Company, the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer and the Company’s principal outside corporate legal
counsel. Executive sessions included candid discussions of
financial management, accounting, internal controls, legal and
compliance issues. Additionally, the Audit Committee’s
chairperson periodically held separate discussions with
representatives of PwC and Ernst & Young, and the
Company’s Chief Financial Officer and principal outside
corporate legal counsel.
8
Audit Committee
Review of Periodic Reports
The Audit Committee reviews each of the Company’s quarterly
and annual reports, including the Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained therein. As part of this review, the Audit Committee
discusses the reports with the Company’s management and
considers the audit and review reports prepared by the
independent registered public accounting firm about the
Company’s quarterly and annual reports. The Audit Committee
also considers related matters such as the quality and
appropriateness, not just the acceptability, of the
Company’s accounting principles, alternative methods of
accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles and the preferences of the independent registered
public accounting firm in this regard, the Company’s
critical accounting policies and the clarity and completeness of
the Company’s financial and other disclosures.
Audit
Committee’s Role in Connection with the Company’s
Report on Internal Controls
The Audit Committee reviewed management’s report on
internal control over financial reporting, required under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related
rules. As part of this review, the Audit Committee reviewed the
bases for management’s conclusions in that report and the
attestation report of the independent registered public
accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting.
Throughout fiscal 2007, the Audit Committee reviewed the results
of management’s plan for documenting and testing controls,
any deficiencies discovered and the resulting remediation of any
such deficiencies.
Review and
Discussions with Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
In its meetings with representatives of PwC, the Audit Committee
asked the independent registered public accounting firm to
address and discuss their responses to several questions that
the Audit Committee believed were particularly relevant to its
oversight. These questions included:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Are there any significant judgments made by management in
preparing the financial statements that would have been made
differently had PwC itself prepared and been responsible for the
financial statements?
|
| |
| |
•
|
Based on PwC’s experience and their knowledge of the
Company, do the Company’s financial statements fairly
present to investors, with clarity and completeness, the
Company’s financial position and performance for the
reporting period in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and SEC disclosure requirements?
|
| |
| |
•
|
Based on PwC’s experience and their knowledge of the
Company, has the Company implemented internal controls over
financial reporting that are appropriate for the Company?
|
| |
| |
•
|
During the course of the fiscal year, has PwC received any
communication or discovered any information indicating any
improprieties with respect to the Company’s accounting and
reporting procedures or reports?
|
The Audit Committee also has discussed with PwC that it is
retained by the Audit Committee and that PwC must raise any
concerns about the Company’s financial reporting and
procedures directly with the Audit Committee. Based on these
discussions, its discussions with management and its review of
applicable periodic reports and financial statements, the Audit
Committee believes it has a reasonable basis for its oversight
judgments and for recommending that the Company’s audited
financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
Membership
The current members of the Compensation Committee are identified
in the “Directors and Committee Membership” table
above.
9
Scope and
Authority
The Compensation Committee (a) reviews and recommends
compensation of the Chief Executive Officer for approval by the
Nominating and Governance Committee, (b) reviews and
approves compensation and benefits for all other executive
officers of the Company, and (c) establishes and reviews
general policies relating to compensation and benefits for the
Company’s employees. The Compensation Committee also
recommends, for approval by the Board of Directors, compensation
of non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee reviews
and approves the incentive cash bonus plans of the Company. In
addition, the Compensation Committee administers the
Company’s 1999 Incentive Plan and will administer the
Company’s 2007 Incentive Plan if it is approved by the
stockholders.
Charter
The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter, a copy
of which is posted in the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate
Governance — Committees” section of the
Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal
2007 (identified in the “Directors and Committee
Membership” table above) is or has been an officer or
employee of Harris Interactive or any of its subsidiaries. No
interlocking relationship, as described in SEC
Regulation S-K
Item 407(e)(4), existed during the last completed fiscal
year between the Company’s Board or Compensation Committee
and the board of directors or compensation committee of any
other company.
Procedures for
Determination of Compensation
The Compensation Committee oversees the design, development and
implementation of the compensation for the directors, Chief
Executive Officer, and other executive officers.
For the directors, the Company’s Executive Vice President,
Human Resources gathers data regarding benchmark and peer group
compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews the data,
information from other sources and the scope of activity of the
Board and its respective committees. Based upon that review the
Committee recommends cash and equity compensation for directors
to the full Board of directors for final approval.
The process used for determination of compensation for the
Company’s executive officers, including the CEO, is
described below in “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis — Role of Compensation Committee and CEO;
Procedures for Determination of Compensation.”
Role of
Compensation Consultants
The role of consultants in the determination of compensation is
discussed below in “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis — Role of Compensation Consultants.”
Research
and Development Committee
Membership
The current members of the Research and Development Committee
are identified in the “Directors and Committee
Membership” table above.
Scope and
Authority
The Research and Development Committee (a) reviews the
status of the Company’s technology and its adequacy for
operation of the Company’s business and achievement of the
Company’s strategic objectives, (b) monitors the
research products and branded methodology as well as the
technology of the Company’s primary competitors as compared
to the Company’s relative offerings, (c) periodically
reviews
10
new product proposals and technological initiatives, and
(d) reviews budgets for new research product development
and technology and determines relevant priorities.
Charter
The Research and Development Committee has adopted a written
charter, a copy of which is posted in the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate
Governance — Committees” section of the
Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com.
Nominating
and Governance Committee
Membership
The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee
are identified in the “Directors and Committee
Membership” table above.
Scope and
Authority
The Nominating and Governance Committee (a) makes
recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the overall
structure, size and composition of the Board of Directors,
(b) selects director nominees for approval at the annual
meeting of the Company’s stockholders, (c) makes
recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding committees
of the Board and membership on those committees,
(d) oversees matters related to succession planning for the
office of the Chief Executive Officer, (e) approves goals
and objectives as well as compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer, and (f) oversees matters related to the governance
of the Company.
Charter
The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a written
charter, a copy of which is posted in the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate
Governance — Committees” section of the
Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com.
Director
Nomination Process
The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that any
nominee recommended by the Committee for a position on the
Company’s Board of Directors must have personal character
and integrity, must have sound judgment, must be willing to
commit the time required for Board service, must have a
commitment to representing the interests of all of the
Company’s stockholders, must have experience relevant to
the Company in one or more fields and must be proficient in
knowledge of corporate governance. In considering candidates for
the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee
requires that independent directors, as defined under Nasdaq
Rule 4200(a)(15), comprise a substantial majority of the
Board. The Committee also requires that at least three of such
independent directors must qualify as independent under SEC
Rule 10A-3(b)(1)
and also satisfy the financial literacy requirements for Audit
Committee membership, and that at least one such member of the
Audit Committee be a “financial expert” as defined in
Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC.
The Nominating and Governance Committee further believes that
one or more, but not necessarily all, of the members of the
Board of Directors should have:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
experience with compensation, executive development, and
executive recruitment matters,
|
| |
| |
•
|
market research industry expertise,
|
| |
| |
•
|
experience with mergers and acquisitions,
|
| |
| |
•
|
experience with strategic and operations planning,
|
| |
| |
•
|
experience with public company operations,
|
11
|
|
|
| |
•
|
experience as a senior executive,
|
| |
| |
•
|
expertise related to global markets,
|
| |
| |
•
|
knowledge of crisis management, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
experience with investor and media relations.
|
Procedures used by the Nominating and Governance Committee in
identifying and evaluating candidates for election to the
Company’s Board of Directors are posted in the
“Investor Relations” — “Corporate
Governance — “Committees” section of the
Company’s website located at www.harrisinteractive.com.
The Committee believes that the continuing service of
qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity in the
board room, contributing to the Board’s ability to work as
a collective body, while giving the Company the benefit of the
familiarity and insight into the Company’s affairs that its
directors have accumulated during their tenure. Accordingly, the
process of the Committee for identifying nominees reflects the
Committee’s practice of re-nominating incumbent directors
who continue to satisfy the Committee’s criteria for
membership on the Board, whom the Committee believes continue to
make important contributions to the Board and who consent to
continue their service on the Board. Consistent with this
policy, in considering candidates for election at annual
meetings of stockholders, the Committee will first determine the
incumbent directors whose terms expire at the upcoming meeting
and who wish to continue their service on the Board. The
Committee will evaluate the qualifications and performance of
the incumbent directors who desire to continue their service. In
particular, as to each such incumbent director, the Committee
will:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
consider whether the director continues to satisfy the minimum
qualifications for director candidates adopted by the Committee,
including among others compliance with the Company’s Code
of Ethics and the Company’s policies related to trading in
the Company’s securities, director ownership of Company
stock and majority vote for directors,
|
| |
| |
•
|
assess the performance of the director including, among others,
attendance at Board and Committee meetings, attendance at the
annual meeting of stockholders and participation in director
education, during the preceding term, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
determine whether any special, countervailing considerations
exist against re-nomination of the director.
|
The Committee will, absent special circumstances, propose the
incumbent director for re-election if the Committee determines
that the incumbent director consents to re-nomination, continues
to be qualified, has satisfactorily performed his or her duties
as director during the preceding term, and there exist no
reasons, including considerations relating to the composition
and functional needs of the Board as a whole, why in the
Committee’s view the incumbent should not be re-nominated.
The Committee will identify and evaluate new candidates for
election to the Board where there is no qualified and available
incumbent, including for the purpose of filling vacancies
arising by reason of the resignation, retirement, removal, death
or disability of an incumbent director or a decision of the
directors to expand the size of the Board. The Committee will
solicit recommendations for nominees from persons whom the
Committee believes are likely to be familiar with qualified
candidates. These persons may include members of the Board and
management of the Company. The Committee also may determine to
engage a professional search firm to assist in identifying
qualified candidates. As to each recommended candidate that the
Committee believes merits consideration, the Committee will:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
cause to be assembled information concerning the background and
qualifications of the candidate, including information
concerning the candidate required to be disclosed in the
Company’s proxy statement under the rules of the SEC and
any relationship between the candidate and the person or persons
recommending the candidate,
|
| |
| |
•
|
determine if the candidate satisfies the minimum qualifications
required by the Committee of candidates for election as
director, including among others the candidate’s agreement
to comply
|
12
|
|
|
| |
|
with the Company’s Code of Ethics and the Company’s
policies related to trading in the Company’s securities,
director ownership of Company stock and majority vote for
directors,
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
determine if the candidate possesses any of the specific
qualities or skills that under the Committee’s policies
must be possessed by one or more members of the Board,
|
| |
| |
•
|
consider the contribution that the candidate can be expected to
make to the overall functioning of the Board, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
consider the extent to which the membership of the candidate on
the Board will promote diversity among the directors.
|
The Committee may, in its discretion, solicit the views of the
Chief Executive Officer, other members of the Company’s
senior management and other members of the Board regarding the
qualifications and suitability of candidates to be nominated as
directors. In addition, in its discretion, the Committee may
designate one or more of its members to interview any proposed
candidate. Based on all available information and relevant
considerations, the Committee will select a candidate who, in
the view of the Committee, is most suited for membership on the
Board.
During fiscal 2007, the Company did not pay any fee to a third
party to identify or evaluate or assist with the identification
or evaluation of director nominees.
In making its selection, the Committee will evaluate candidates
proposed by stockholders under criteria similar to the
evaluation of other candidates, including among others the
candidate’s agreement to comply with the Company’s
Code of Ethics and the Company’s policies related to
trading in the Company’s securities, director ownership of
Company stock and majority vote for directors. The Committee may
consider, as one of the factors in its evaluation of stockholder
recommended nominees, the size and duration of the interest of
the recommending stockholder or stockholder group in the equity
of the Company. The Committee also may consider the extent to
which the recommending stockholder intends to continue holding
its interest in the Company, including, in the case of nominees
recommended for election at an annual meeting of stockholders,
whether the recommending stockholder intends to continue holding
its interest at least through the time of such annual meeting.
Nominees for
Election at the 2007 Annual Meeting
The Nominating and Governance Committee has nominated and
recommended Stephen D. Harlan, Howard L. Shecter and Antoine G.
Treuille for election to the Board by the stockholders at the
2007 Annual Meeting.
Candidates
Recommended by Stockholders
Stockholders may recommend qualified director candidates for
consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee using
procedures posted in the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate Governance”
section of the Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com. The procedures generally
require that the recommendation be submitted in writing by mail,
courier, or personal delivery, addressed to: Chairman of the
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors,
c/o Corporate
Secretary, Harris Interactive Inc., 60 Corporate Woods,
Rochester, New York 14623. The envelope should indicate that it
contains a stockholder recommendation for director nomination.
Submissions should be as required by the procedures and in
general must include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the stockholder’s name, address, telephone number, number
of shares owned, length of period held, proof of ownership, and
statement as to whether the stockholder has a good faith
intention to continue to hold the reported shares through the
next annual meeting of stockholders,
|
| |
| |
•
|
name, age and address of the candidate,
|
13
|
|
|
| |
•
|
a detailed resume describing, among other things, the
candidate’s educational background, occupation, five years
business experience and material outside commitments (e.g.,
memberships on other boards and committees, charitable
foundations etc.),
|
| |
| |
•
|
a description of all arrangements or understandings between the
stockholder and the nominee and any other person or persons
(naming them) pursuant to which the nomination is being made by
the stockholder,
|
| |
| |
•
|
information regarding the nominee’s ownership of securities
of the Company, certain types of legal proceedings, and business
relationships and transactions between the nominee and the
Company,
|
| |
| |
•
|
all other information regarding the candidate that would be
required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to
the then-current proxy rules of the SEC, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the candidate’s written consent: (i) to being named in
the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if
elected, and (ii) to comply with all policies applicable to
directors of the Company including among others the
Company’s Code of Ethics and the Company’s policies
related to trading in the Company’s securities, director
ownership of Company stock and majority vote for directors.
|
Nominating recommendations for an annual meeting of stockholders
must be received by the Company at least 90 calendar days prior
to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for
the prior annual meeting of stockholders. The Nominating and
Governance Committee will review and evaluate each candidate
whom it believes merits serious consideration using the
Nominating and Governance Committee Procedures described above.
In addition to recommending candidates to the Nominating and
Governance Committee, a stockholder may directly nominate a
director by giving written notice in proper written form to the
Corporate Secretary pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company which
are posted in the “Investor Relations” —
“Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s
website located at www.harrisinteractive.com. To be
timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Secretary must be
delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive
offices of the Company not less than 90 calendar days nor more
than 120 calendar days before the first anniversary of the
mailing date of the proxy statement for the prior annual meeting
of stockholders. To be in proper written form, a
stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must set
forth as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to
nominate for election as a director:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the name, age, business address and residence address of the
person,
|
| |
| |
•
|
the principal occupation or employment of the person,
|
| |
| |
•
|
the class or series and number of shares of stock of the Company
which are owned beneficially or of record by the person:
|
| |
| |
•
|
any other information relating to the person that would be
required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings
required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies
for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the
Securities Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
|
In addition, the notice must set forth as to the stockholder
giving the notice:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the name and record address of such stockholder,
|
| |
| |
•
|
the class or series and number of shares of stock of the Company
which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder,
|
| |
| |
•
|
a description of all arrangements or understandings between such
stockholder and each proposed nominee and any other person or
persons (including their names) pursuant to which the
nomination(s) are to be made by such stockholder,
|
14
|
|
|
| |
•
|
a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in
person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persons named
in its notice, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
any other information relating to such stockholder that would be
required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings
required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies
for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the
Securities Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
|
Such notice must be accompanied by a written consent of each
proposed nominee to being named as a nominee and to serve as a
director if elected.
Stockholder
Communications
The Company’s policy is to facilitate communications
between stockholders and other interested parties and the Board
of Directors. Stockholders wishing to communicate with the
Company’s Board of Directors should follow the detailed
procedures posted in the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate Governance”
section of the Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com. The procedures, as detailed on
the website, provide for communications to be in writing and
mailed to Board of Directors, Harris Interactive Inc.,
c/o Harris
Beach PLLC, Attention: Beth Ela Wilkens, 99 Garnsey Road,
Pittsford, New York 14534. The Board of Directors has adopted a
separate procedure for communications regarding accounting,
auditing, and financial reporting matters. Communications of
this nature should be submitted following the Company’s
“Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing
Matters” which may be found in the “Investor
Relations” — “Corporate
Governance” — “Report an Issue” section
of the Company’s website located at
www.harrisinteractive.com.
In September, 2006, the Board adopted Governance Guidelines for
the Company. A copy of such Guidelines may be found in the
“Investor Relations” — “Corporate
Governance” section of the Company’s website located
at www.harrisinteractive.com. The Guidelines generally
describe the respective roles and responsibilities of the Board
of Directors and management and the expectations of individual
directors. The Guidelines, among other matters,
|
|
|
| |
•
|
require a substantial majority of the Board to be independent,
|
| |
| |
•
|
continue the Company’s current practice of having both a
Chairman of the Board of Directors and a Lead Director, both of
whom are independent,
|
| |
| |
•
|
require a member of management to resign from the Board upon
termination of employment unless otherwise determined by the
Nominating and Governance Committee,
|
| |
| |
•
|
require a non-employee director whose employment status,
position, or business or professional association changes to
notify the Nominating and Governance Committee, which will
consider that factor at the time it considers whether to
re-nominate the director,
|
| |
| |
•
|
establish a general policy that directors should limit their
service on boards of publicly traded companies to no more than
five (including the Company’s Board), and should limit
their service on audit committees of such companies to no more
than three (including the Company’s Audit Committee), and
requires the Nominating and Governance Committee to take any
exceptions into account at the time it considers whether to
re-nominate the director,
|
| |
| |
•
|
create an expectation that each director will attend at least
one director education program each year,
|
| |
| |
•
|
establish guidelines for Board operations,
|
| |
| |
•
|
require that a meaningful portion of non-employee director
compensation will be provided in, or based upon, the
Company’s stock in order to align interests of directors
with those of the stockholders,
|
15
|
|
|
| |
•
|
require directors to hold at least 25,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock, of which at least 10,000 should be
purchased either directly or through exercise of options,
subject to a phase-in process, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
require directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders
absent compelling circumstances preventing such attendance.
|
In addition, the Governance Guidelines establish a majority vote
standard for directors, as described below.
The Board of Directors has adopted the following policy
providing for resignation of a director upon receipt of a
greater number of “Withhold” votes than
“For” votes in an election of directors.
In an uncontested election of directors (i.e., an election where
the only nominees are those recommended by the Board of
Directors), any nominee for director who receives a greater
number of votes “withheld” from his or her election
than votes “for” his or her election will promptly
tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board
following certification of the stockholder vote.
The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors will promptly consider the resignation submitted by a
director receiving a greater number of votes
“withheld” than votes “for” his or her
election, and will recommend to the Board of Directors whether
to accept or reject the tendered resignation. In making its
recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may
consider any factors or other information that it considers
appropriate and relevant, including without limitation, any
known stated reasons why stockholders “withheld” votes
for election from such director, the length of service and
qualifications of the director, the director’s
contributions to the Company, and this policy. The Board of
Directors will act to accept or reject the tendered resignation,
taking into account the Nominating and Governance
Committee’s recommendation and any other information and
factors it deems relevant, within 90 days after the date of
certification of the election results. Promptly after making its
decision, the Board of Directors will publicly disclose, by a
filing with the SEC, its decision regarding the tendered
resignation and the rationale behind it.
Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this
provision will not participate in the Nominating and Governance
Committee recommendation or Board consideration as to whether or
not to accept the tendered resignation.
If one or more director’s resignations are accepted by the
Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee will
recommend to the Board of Directors whether to fill such vacancy
or vacancies pursuant to the provisions of Article III,
Section 5 of the Bylaws of the Company, or to reduce the
size of the Board of Directors pursuant to the provisions of
Article III, Section 1 of the Bylaws of the Company.
If the Board of Directors determines to fill such vacancy or
vacancies, the Nominating and Governance Committee will nominate
a person or persons to fill such vacancy or vacancies for
consideration by the Board of Directors.
If a director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board of
Directors, such director will continue to serve until the
expiration of his or her term, or his or her earlier resignation
or removal.
The information contained in this Audit Committee Report shall
not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be
“filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A
or 14C promulgated by the SEC or the liabilities of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically requests that the
information be treated as soliciting material or specifically
incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”) or the Securities Exchange Act. The information
contained in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to
be
16
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent Harris
Interactive specifically incorporates it by reference.
The Audit Committee has:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial
statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007,
included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
with the Company’s management,
|
| |
| |
•
|
discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication
with Audit Committees, as amended and as adopted by the
Public Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3600T, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
received from PwC the written disclosures and the letter
required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as
adopted by the Public Accounting Oversight Board in
Rule 3200T, discussed with PwC its independence, and
concluded that PwC is independent from the Company and its
management.
|
Based upon its review and discussion with management and the
Company’s independent registered public accountants, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s
audited financial statements be included in the Company’s
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board:
Mr. Stephen D. Harlan (Chairman)
Mr. David Brodsky
Mr. James R. Riedman
Mr. Howard L. Shecter
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this Compensation Committee Report
shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to
be “filed” with the SEC or subject to
Regulation 14A or 14C promulgated by the SEC or the
liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that
the information be treated as soliciting material or
specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed
under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act. The
information contained in this Compensation Committee Report
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act,
except to the extent Harris Interactive specifically
incorporates it by reference.
The Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with the
Company’s management, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
based upon such review and discussion, recommended to the Board
that such Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in
this Proxy Statement.
|
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board:
Mr. James R. Riedman (Chairman)
Mr. David Brodsky
Mr. Howard L. Shecter
Mr. Antoine G. Treuille
17
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Under the direction of the Compensation Committee, the Company
has designed a compensation program for its NEOs (defined below
in “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers”)
intended to balance the need to provide compensation competitive
with that provided by the Company’s peers with
accountability for performance. The program provides:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
cash base compensation and contractual protections competitive
within the industry, designed to enable the Company to recruit
and retain highly qualified individuals,
|
| |
| |
•
|
cash bonus incentives that directly link pay to performance,
designed to motivate executives to deliver superior
results, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
long term equity incentives, specifically stock options and
restricted stock awards, designed to align the interests of
Company executives with those of Harris Interactive’s
stockholders in achieving long-term growth.
|
While the compensation programs are designed to deliver
competitive total compensation by setting targets at
approximately the median level of peer group total compensation,
the Compensation Committee also believes that it is important to
have flexibility to reward performance and to adjust for
evolving business conditions. Generally, the Compensation
Committee does not adhere to rigid formulas or react to
short-term changes in business performance in determining the
mix of compensation elements. It relies on the formulaic
achievement of financial goals only in the instance of the
Company’s Corporate and Business Unit cash bonus plans, and
only in part within those plans.
Consistent with the Committee’s focus on encouraging
collaboration at all levels of the Company, the types of
compensation and benefits provided to the NEOs are similar in
most respects to those provided to the Company’s other
executives. The Compensation Committee avoids providing
significant perquisites to NEOs, and has provided only limited
severance and change of control protection.
Implementing
the Compensation Committee’s Objectives
Overall
Competitive Compensation Package
The Company’s compensation programs are designed to deliver
competitive total compensation by setting targets at
approximately the median level of “Peer Group” total
compensation. The Compensation Committee benchmarks not only
total compensation but also individual elements (such as base
salaries, annual incentive compensation, and equity-based
incentives) against those of the Peer Group and other published
survey sources. For fiscal 2007, the Peer Group consisted of
Arbitron Inc., Autobytel Inc., Forrester Research, Inc.,
Gartner, Inc., Greenfield Online, Inc., ICT Group, Innotrac
Corp., Keynote Systems, Inc., Mapinfo Corp., Netratings Inc.,
PDI, Inc., Rentrak Corp., Source Interlink Cos., and inVentiv
Health, Inc.. Other survey sources consulted included ECS-Watson
Wyatt Data Services — 2006/2007 Survey of Top
Management Compensation, and Mercer Executive Compensation
Services — 2006 Executive Benchmark Database.
Individual factors affecting overall compensation for the
Company’s NEOs include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
level of responsibility and experience,
|
| |
| |
•
|
achievement of established individual goals,
|
| |
| |
•
|
leadership qualities,
|
| |
| |
•
|
operational performance, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
fostering the importance of high standards of ethical and legal
compliance throughout the Company.
|
18
NEOs with business unit responsibility are also measured by
achievement of targeted client satisfaction scores.
Mix of Types
of Compensation
The Compensation Committee strives to achieve an appropriate mix
between types of compensation in order to meet the
Company’s objectives. Any apportionment goal is not applied
rigidly and does not control compensation decisions. Rather, the
Compensation Committee assesses an executive’s total
compensation opportunities and whether the Company has provided
the appropriate mix of incentives to remain competitive, reward
recent results, and motivate long-term performance. The
Committee therefore balances compensation elements that provide
a competitive base with those that provide pay for financial
performance and those that are aligned with long-term
performance of the Company’s stock.
The Compensation Committee applies a different mix of base
salary and cash bonus compensation to different executive
officer positions, which it reviews each year. Cash bonuses
range from 50% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer to
approximately 31% of base salary for most group presidents. In
order to reach and exceed mean Peer Group total cash
compensation, NEOs would need to earn a combination of base
salary and performance-based bonus compensation. In addition,
subject to then-existing circumstances, the Compensation
Committee generally targets making equity grants to employees
and directors of the Company of between 1.5% and 2% of
outstanding common shares on an annual basis. Of those grants,
approximately 65% are targeted for executive officers, with the
aggregate of all grants in a particular fiscal year targeted to
include a mix of approximately 60% non-qualified stock options
and 40% shares of restricted common stock.
Base
Salary — Remaining Competitive
Base salary is part of each executive’s compensation
package because the Compensation Committee believes that the
Company must guarantee a fixed portion of cash compensation in
order to remain competitive in recruiting and retaining
executives. Competitive pay practices are the primary
determinant of the range within which individual salaries are
set.
Base salaries are established using Peer Group median
compensation as a reference point, and taking into account the
level of responsibility and role of the individual NEO.
Adjustments are made on a subjective basis taking into account
Peer Group references and the executive’s performance. The
Compensation Committee reviews base salaries annually, and in
the interim if an NEO’s position and responsibilities
change. Salaries are not automatically increased if the
Committee believes that a raise is not warranted by either
individual or Company performance, or that other forms of
compensation are more appropriate to further stated objectives.
For example, Gregory T. Novak’s base salary has changed in
connection with changes in his responsibilities in the Company.
His salary was increased to $368,000 in fiscal 2004 upon his
promotion to President and Chief Operating Officer. It was again
increased in fiscal 2005 to $425,000 upon him being named Acting
Chief Executive Officer and in fiscal 2006 to $475,000 upon his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer. In addition to
increases related to changes in responsibility,
Mr. Novak’s salary was increased from $475,000 to
$500,000 at the end of fiscal 2006 in order to keep his base
salary competitive with the Peer Group. By contrast, salaries of
NEOs who did not have a change in responsibilities in fiscal
2007 were reviewed based upon individual and overall Company
performance and Peer Group reports. No NEO received a base
salary increase for fiscal 2008.
Cash Bonus
Plan — Linking Compensation to
Performance
The Company’s cash bonus plans are designed to directly
link executive officer’s, including NEO’s, pay to
Company, and in some cases specific business unit, performance.
Actual payouts under the plans are determined through targeted
levels of achievement for specified metrics. The metrics are
intended to be those most closely linked to Company performance
objectives over which the Compensation Committee believes the
plan participants have the most direct control.
19
NEO participation in the Company’s cash bonus plans was as
follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Bonus
|
|
Business Unit
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan
|
|
Bonus
Plan
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
100%
|
|
—
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
100%
|
|
—
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
100%
|
|
—
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
FY 2007 — 50%
|
|
FY 2007 — 50%
|
|
|
|
FY 2008 — 0%
|
|
FY 2008 — 100%
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
—
|
|
100%
|
Under the Corporate Bonus Plan, a fixed dollar pool of $945,000
is established. The actual payout from the pool increases or
decreases based upon achievement of pre-set metrics. For NEOs,
the applicable metric in fiscal 2007 was pre-tax profits, and in
fiscal 2008 will be “Adjusted EBITDA” (EBITDA adjusted
to remove the effect of non-cash stock-based compensation
expense). Each participant in the Corporate Bonus Plan is
allocated a specified percentage of the pool.
In order for a participant in the Corporate Bonus Plan to
achieve his or her full personal target bonus, pre-tax earnings
in fiscal 2007, or Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2008, would have to
be 4% greater than budget. Based upon better or worse
performance, bonus payouts can increase or decrease. Absent any
discretionary allocation, 64% of targeted bonus pool is payable
if performance is equal to budget. No bonus was payable if
performance was less than 85% of budget in fiscal 2007 and for
fiscal year 2008, no bonus is payable if performance is less
than 90% of budget.
Under the Business Unit Bonus Plan, individual metrics are
established for each participant. The following percentages of
the bonus for each NEO paid out of the Business Unit Bonus Plan
are based upon the following metrics:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
% — Metric(1)
|
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
100% — Metrics related
to research operations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
25% — Company-wide
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65% — Budgeted operating
income for North America operations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% — Evaluation of
performance against individual management objectives
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
25% — Company-wide
Adjusted pre-tax profit(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65% — Budgeted operating
income for European operations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% — Evaluation of
performance against individual management objectives
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
25% — Company-wide
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65% — Budgeted operating
income for European operations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% — Evaluation of
performance against individual management objectives
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Vaden’s bonus may be increased by up to 15% or
decreased by as much as 10% based upon actual client
satisfaction scores in North America. Dr. Terhanian’s
bonus may be increased by up to 10% or decreased by as much 5%
based upon actual client satisfaction scores in Europe. |
20
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Related to the 50% portion of his bonus paid out of the Business
Unit Bonus Plan. He participated in the Corporate Bonus Plan for
the remaining 50% of his bonus opportunity. |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Same sliding scale as applicable to the Corporate Bonus Plan |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Absent any discretionary allocation, 100% of targeted bonus is
payable if performance is equal to budget. No bonus is payable
if performance is less than 70% of budget. Between 70% and 100%
performance, a sliding scale applies (for example, 40% payout at
70% of budgeted performance and 70% payout at 90% of budgeted
performance). |
In fiscal 2007 the Corporate Bonus Plan did not have a
discretionary component, and a small percentage of the pool
under the Company’s other bonus plans including the
Business Unit Bonus Plan was discretionary for allocation within
the particular plan. Beginning in fiscal 2008, up to $850,000
under all of the Company’s bonus plans, including the
Corporate Bonus Plan, will be available to be awarded to the
participants in any of those plans in the discretion of the
Chief Executive Officer, subject in the case of executive
officers to approval by the Compensation Committee.
Target bonuses for each of the NEOs as compared to payouts for
fiscal 2007 were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fiscal 2007
Target($)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
Payout($)
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
96,048
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
57,629
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
51,866
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
94,294
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
71,197
|
|
Messrs. Vaden and Terhanian received a higher percentage of
target bonus than the other NEOs because of higher achievement
of objectives under the Business Unit Bonus Plan. For fiscal
2008, Mr. Vaden’s target bonus was increased to
$150,000 based upon his change of position to President,
North America and Global Operations, and
Dr. Terhanian’s target bonus was increased to $100,000
based upon his performance in fiscal 2007.
The Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify the
payouts that would otherwise be applicable under the Corporate
Bonus Plan, such as to include or exclude items in the pre-tax
profit or Adjusted EBITDA calculation that were unexpected and
that the Committee believes would cause the calculation,
strictly applied, to be unfair to the NEOs or the Company. In
fiscal 2007, the Committee exercised its discretion to
re-allocate approximately $800,000 in bonus pool funds between
the Corporate and Business Unit Bonus Plans to avoid what the
Committee believed to be an unfair result to specific employees.
Based upon overall Company performance, the reallocation was
intended to keep actual bonuses well below target levels,
particularly among NEOs who participate only in the Corporate
Bonus Plan, but to compensate for the structure of the plans
that would have prevented the payment of any bonus to executives
whose individual efforts during the year, in the judgment of the
Committee, merited a limited cash incentive compensation payment.
Equity
Incentive Compensation — Aligning Compensation with
Stockholder Value
The Compensation Committee seeks to align the interests of the
Company’s NEOs with those of its stockholders by providing
a significant portion of total compensation in the form of
equity grants, generally through the Company’s 1999
Incentive Plan. The Committee also uses equity awards as
incentives for NEOs to continue employment with the Company over
the longer term, as such awards generally include four-year
vesting schedules.
Historically, the Company’s equity grants were only in the
form of stock options, under which executives recognize value
commensurate with increases in long-term stockholder value. More
recently, the Compensation Committee also has made restricted
stock grants. Restricted stock provides immediate value to the
NEO, but places him or her at risk for actual losses in the
event that stockholder value decreases. Both stock options and
restricted stock link compensation to long-term performance.
Both also
21
have a retentive effect because they vest over a period of time.
Beginning in fiscal 2008, restricted stock granted to NEOs also
will be more closely linked to individual performance as well as
stockholder value because vesting will require not only
continued service but also achievement of specific performance
targets identified by the Compensation Committee at the time of
the grant.
The equity incentives provided to each individual are based upon
industry competitive practices, advice from consultants, and
judgments made by the Compensation Committee as to relative
position, responsibilities, and historical and expected
contributions to the Company, taking into account existing stock
ownership and previous stock-based grants. Primary weight is
given to relative rank and responsibilities. Initial grants
designed to recruit an executive officer to join the Company
have been based on negotiations with the officer and reference
to historical option grants to existing executive officers.
The Compensation Committee weighs the cost of equity grants with
their potential benefits as a compensation tool. The Committee
believes that issuing equity-based awards on an annual basis in
an aggregate range less than or equal to 2% of the total shares
outstanding of the Company’s stock is appropriate. The
current practice is to provide the bulk of equity incentives to
the executive officers whose individual performance has the
greatest impact on overall Company performance. As such, the
Compensation Committee targets approximately 65% of annual
grants for the executive officer group, but reserves the right
to change its targets from time to time.
Beginning in fiscal 2006, the Compensation Committee targeted an
approximate mix of 60% stock options and 40% restricted stock as
providing an effective balance between providing retentive value
to the Company’s NEOs and further incentivizing the NEOs to
deliver long-term value to the Company’s stockholders.
Stock options incentivize the delivery of long-term value to
stockholders because they only have value to the NEOs to the
extent that the price of the Company’s stock on the date of
exercise exceeds the exercise price on the grant date. Their
retentive value is limited because they have value only if the
stock price increases over the term of the award. Restricted
stock has more retentive value than stock options because it
offers immediate value to executives which can be lost if the
executive does not remain with the Company until the
restrictions lapse. In addition, restricted stock closely aligns
the interests of NEOs with stockholders because NEOs suffer the
same loss of value as other stockholders if the Company’s
stock price declines. Thus, restricted stock serves not only to
reward and retain executives, but also to place them at risk for
decreases in stockholder value.
Stock options are granted at fair market value and generally
vest over a four-year period. 25% become exercisable on the
one-year anniversary of the grant date, with the remainder
vesting ratably over the remaining 36 months.
The Compensation Committee awards restricted stock at the market
price on the date of grant, typically with a four-year
forfeiture schedule. Historically, forfeitures lapsed on the
same schedule as the Committee uses for stock option vesting.
Starting in fiscal 2008, forfeitures of 25% of restricted stock
awards will lapse on each of the first four anniversaries
following the award date. Of the NEOs, only Mr. Vaden, the
Company’s President, North America and Global Operations,
received grants of stock options and restricted stock in fiscal
2007. The grants were made in consideration of his assumption of
increased corporate duties.
Beginning in fiscal 2008, restricted stock awards to certain
NEOs may fully vest in less than four years and generally will
include performance-based vesting requirements in addition to
the continued service requirement. To that end, awards of shares
of restricted stock made on August 31, 2007 to
Messrs. Novak, Salluzzo, and Terhanian will be forfeited
unless the Company achieves 20.3% year-over-year revenue growth,
adjusted for acquisitions, in fiscal 2008 with minimum Adjusted
EBITDA of 9.5%. For performance above the minimum thresholds,
the shares will vest proportionately with better results based
upon a 60% Adjusted EBITDA-40% revenue growth weighted average.
For example, with 25.1% year-over-year revenue growth, adjusted
for acquisitions in fiscal 2008, and 11.7% Adjusted EBITDA, 100%
of the award will vest on August 31, 2008. The Committee
believes that performance-based awards provide additional
linkage between executive compensation and longer term growth of
the Company.
22
Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 1999 Long Term
Incentive Plan (and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, if
approved by the stockholders), all of the equity awards granted
by the Company vest immediately upon a change in control of the
Company. The Compensation Committee believes that the vesting
schedule contributes to the Company’s ability to retain
executives and motivate long-term performance. Vesting upon a
change of control provides an incentive to employees to remain
with the Company during a transition period in the event the
Board decides to pursue a change of control transaction, and
recognizes that the linkage between performance and stockholder
value will not be the same after the change of control.
Other
Compensation
Deferred
Compensation Plans
The Company does not offer any deferred compensation plans to
its executives other than the 401(k) Plan available to all
employees, described below.
401(k)
Plan
The Company maintains a 401(k) Plan for its employees, including
executive officers, to encourage employees to save some
percentage of their cash compensation, through voluntary
deferrals, for their eventual retirement. The 401(k) Plan
permits employees to make such deferrals in a tax efficient
manner. The Company may, in its discretion, match employee
deferrals. For fiscal 2007, the Company made matching
contributions equal to up to 100% of the first 6% of
compensation deferred by employees (subject to IRS limits and
non-discrimination testing).
Perquisites and
Other Benefits
Incidental to their employment by, and the nature of their
duties to the Company, the NEOs receive some compensation in the
forms of perquisites and personal benefits. For fiscal 2007, of
the Named Executive Officers, only Dr. Terhanian received
total perquisites that exceeded $10,000. The most common forms
of perquisites provided by Harris Interactive to its NEOs are
additional life insurance and reimbursement of attorney’s
fees in connection with negotiation of employment agreements,
the cost of which is disclosed below. The Committee believes
providing additional protection for the families of the
Company’s NEOs alleviates personal concerns and focuses
their attention on the business of the Company.
Dr. Terhanian receives certain perquisites related to his
Company-requested temporary relocation to Europe, including an
apartment allowance, two round-trip coach class airfares to the
United States for personal visits, and assistance with tax
filings. The aggregate amount of such perquisites received by
Dr. Terhanian during fiscal 2007 is included in the Summary
Compensation Table below.
Post-Termination
Compensation
The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain
of its executives, including each of the NEOs. These agreements
provide for certain severance payments if the executive’s
employment terminates without cause or for good reason,
including such a termination in the first year following a
change in control. The same severance is provided if an
NEO’s employment agreement is not renewed by the Company at
the end of each annual term. In addition, if there is a change
in control, all equity based compensation automatically vests.
The Compensation Committee believes that these arrangements are
important as a recruitment and retention device, as most of the
companies with which Harris Interactive competes for executive
talent have similar agreements in place for their executives. In
addition, to the extent that these arrangements apply to a
change of control, they help alleviate any concern NEOs might
have regarding their own continued employment following any
change, and also help incentivize the NEOs to remain with the
Company to assist in any change of control transaction the Board
determines is appropriate to pursue.
23
The Company links severance benefits to agreements by the NEOs
not to disclose the Company’s confidential information, not
to engage in certain competitive activities, and not to solicit
the Company’s employees, customers, and acquisition
prospects. An executive will forfeit the right to receive
post-termination compensation if restrictive covenants in the
employment agreements are breached. The Compensation Committee
believes that these provisions provide important protection for
the Company’s proprietary information and business.
In the case of Leonard R. Bayer, the Company’s Executive
Vice President, Chief Scientist, and Chief Technology Officer,
the Company has agreed to compensate Mr. Bayer if he enters
into a post-termination
27-month
consulting arrangement to provide the Company with transitional
access to Mr. Bayer’s knowledge of the industry and
Harris Interactive’s proprietary technologies and
methodologies.
The Compensation Committee also considers the cost and tax and
accounting implications of post-termination payment
arrangements. Among other factors, the Committee balances
protection of its executives upon a change of control with
protection for the Company by making severance payments
available only if the executive is actually terminated without
cause or leaves for good reason after the change of control (a
so-called “double-trigger” precondition). The
Committee also limits the excess parachute payment protection,
described in “Tax and Accounting Considerations”
below, to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
and President, North America and Global Operations. It further
limits any such reimbursement for only the initial excise tax
imposed and the initial tax on such reimbursement, if any.
Role
of Compensation Committee and CEO; Procedures for Determination
of Compensation
The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for
assisting the Board in developing and evaluating potential
candidates for executive positions, including the CEO, and for
overseeing the development of executive succession plans. The
Compensation Committee oversees the design, development and
implementation of the compensation for the CEO and the other
NEOs.
For the CEO, the Nominating and Governance Committee of the
Board approves goals and objectives. The Board Chairman and the
Compensation Committee conduct a thorough performance evaluation
of the CEO in light of the established goals and objectives,
including among others interviews with persons with whom the CEO
has regular interaction. The Compensation Committee then
recommends all forms of CEO compensation, taking into account
the goals and objectives of the Company’s overall
compensation program, to the Nominating and Governance Committee
of the Board which has final approval authority over his
compensation package as well as the target goals and objectives
against which his performance will be measured.
For other executive officers, the CEO and the Compensation
Committee together assess performance. The CEO and the Executive
Vice President, Human Resources make initial recommendations
regarding compensation of each executive officer. The
Compensation Committee reviews the recommendations, makes any
adjustments it deems appropriate in its discretion, and
exercises its final approval authority over all compensation for
executive officers. The executive officers do not play a role in
their own compensation determination, other than discussing
individual performance objectives with the CEO and Executive
Vice President, Human Resources.
From time to time, the CEO and the Executive Vice President,
Human Resources recommend equity awards to be made under the
1999 Incentive Plan and may continue to do so under the 2007
Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee, which has exclusive
authority to make such awards to the CEO and other executive
officers, considers such recommendations, information provided
by compensation consultants, and other factors in determining
whether to make such awards.
Role
of Compensation Consultants
Neither the Company nor the Compensation Committee has an
on-going contractual arrangement with any compensation
consultant who has a role in determining or recommending the
amount or form of
24
senior executive or director compensation. In the past, the
Company, through its Human Resources department, and the
Compensation Committee have together discussed with outside
compensation consultants the design of programs that affect
senior executive officer compensation. In fiscal 2007, the
Compensation Committee determined that all consultants dealing
with executive and director compensation must be retained by and
report directly to the Committee.
In fiscal 2007, the Burke Group was engaged to provide guidance
to the Compensation Committee with respect to structuring
performance-based restricted stock awards. The Burke Group was
asked to provide information as to practices employed by
benchmark and peer companies, to review structural alternatives,
and to advise the Compensation Committee as to the potential
efficacy of the various alternative structures in achieving the
Company’s compensation goals. The Burke Group worked with
the Executive Vice President, Human Resources but reported
directly to the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee is currently soliciting proposals
from compensation consultants who can assist the Committee in a
comprehensive review of its contractual and other arrangements
with its executives. Among others, the Committee will solicit
advice as to, and review, the relationship among all forms of
Company compensation, the Company’s equity awards structure
and practices and the structure of the Company’s
post-termination and change in control arrangements.
The Compensation Committee has established a policy regarding
the dates for making grants of options and restricted stock to
existing employees under the 1999 Incentive Plan, and will
continue the policy under the 2007 Incentive Plan if it is
approved by the stockholders. Except in the case of awards made
in connection with acquisitions or other extraordinary
circumstances, awards are made only on the
15th calendar
day of the month in which quarterly results are publicly
announced or, if results are not announced by that time, seven
days following their public release. These dates were
established so that grants would be effective at a time when the
Company expects the most current information regarding its
performance to be available to the public market. However,
because the award dates are pre-determined, some awards may be
made at a time when the Company is in possession of material
non-public information. The exercise price of each stock option
awarded under the 1999 Incentive Plan was, and if approved the
2007 Incentive Plan will be, the closing price of the
Company’s stock on the date of grant.
The Compensation Committee administers the 1999 Incentive Plan
and would administer the 2007 Incentive Plan, taking into
account recommendations from management. The Committee selects
those individuals to whom equity-based awards should be granted
and the amount and terms of those awards. The Compensation
Committee has delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer
and Executive Vice President, Human Resources, acting together,
to make limited levels of stock option awards to employees who
are not executive officers; and to the Chief Executive Officer,
acting as a Committee of the Board, to make limited levels of
restricted stock grants to employees who are not executive
officers. In general, the Committee will make restricted stock
awards itself when practical. The specific delegation of
authority is described in more detail below in
“Proposal No. 2 — “Summary of the
Provisions of the 2007 Incentive Plan — Plan
Administration; Grant Dates, Grant Prices.”
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
The Compensation Committee adopted guidelines for stock
ownership for certain executive officers during fiscal 2007. The
guidelines will require each of Messrs. Novak, Salluzzo,
Bayer, and Vaden to own Company stock with a value equal to
one-times base salary by July 1, 2013. Any person appointed
in the future to serve as Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Chief Operating
Officer, or Chief Operations Officer (if any) must meet the same
requirement within five years after the date of appointment to
the covered position. Shares held in the Company’s 401(k)
Plan, existing Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “1999
Purchase Plan”), and 2007 Purchase Plan (if approved by
stockholders), as well as vested and unvested
non-performance-based restricted stock, would count
25
toward the requirement, but unexercised stock options and
unvested performance-based restricted stock would not.
The Company’s policies prohibit all insiders, including
NEOs, from hedging the risk associated with stock ownership
without express consent of the Board of Directors.
Tax
and Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the IRC generally denies publicly-held
corporations a federal income tax deduction for compensation
exceeding $1,000,000 paid to the Chief Executive Officer or any
of the four other highest paid executive officers, excluding
performance-based compensation. Through June 30, 2007, this
provision has not limited the Company’s ability to deduct
executive compensation. The Compensation Committee will continue
to monitor the potential impact of Section 162(m) on the
Company’s ability to deduct executive compensation. The
1999 Incentive Plan and the 2007 Incentive Plan have been
designed, and are intended to be administered, in a manner that
will enable the Company to deduct compensation attributable to
options and certain other awards thereunder, without regard to
the deduction limitation established by Section 162(m).
Section 409A of the IRC generally changes the tax rules
that affect most forms of deferred compensation that were not
earned and vested prior to 2005, and imposes an additional tax
on certain forms of deferred compensation. The Committee takes
Section 409A into account in determining the form and
timing of compensation paid to the Company’s executives,
and Section 409A is generally not applicable to the
compensation provided by the Company.
Sections 280G and 4999 of the IRC limit the Company’s
ability to take a tax deduction for certain “excess
parachute payments” (as defined in Sections 280G and
4999) and impose excise taxes on each executive that
receives “excess parachute payments” in connection
with his or her severance from the Company in connection with a
change in control. The Compensation Committee considers the
adverse tax liabilities imposed by Sections 280G and 4999,
as well as other competitive factors, in structuring certain
post-termination compensation payable to the Company’s
NEOs. The Committee balances the potential adverse tax
consequences to the Company and the executive by limiting the
extent of reimbursement to executives for excise taxes on excess
parachute payments.
The Company expenses stock option and restricted stock grants
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
and has done so since adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on
July 1, 2005. More information regarding the application of
SFAS No. 123(R) by the Company may be found in
Note 13 to the Company’s audited financial statements
included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
26
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information in this section is provided for our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other executive
officers most highly compensated in fiscal 2007, determined
using the methodology for determining “total
compensation” provided by the SEC (collectively, our
“NEOs”). The following table sets forth the name, age
and position of the Company’s NEOs, each of whom have been
appointed by and are serving at the pleasure of our Board:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
Scientist and Chief Technology Officer
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
President, North America and
Global Operations
|
|
George H. Terhanian, PhD
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
President, Harris Interactive
Europe and Global Internet Research
|
The business experience of each of the NEOs, as well as
information regarding the other executive officers of the
Company, is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table and accompanying footnotes provide
information regarding compensation for our NEOs for fiscal year
2007:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus($)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
Compensation($)(4)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
President and Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
493,269
|
|
|
|
96,048
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
748,169
|
|
|
|
7,170
|
|
|
|
1,344,656
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
332,308
|
|
|
|
57,629
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
354,200
|
|
|
|
6,656
|
|
|
|
750,793
|
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
329,538
|
|
|
|
51,866
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,150
|
|
|
|
7,095
|
|
|
|
400,649
|
|
|
President, Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scientist, and Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
President, North
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
306,731
|
|
|
|
94,924
|
|
|
|
65,091
|
|
|
|
353,204
|
|
|
|
6,038
|
|
|
|
825,988
|
|
|
America and Global
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
President, Harris
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
275,408
|
|
|
|
71,197
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,870
|
|
|
|
35,855
|
|
|
|
404,330
|
|
|
Interactive Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Global Internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects base salary earned during fiscal year 2007 and includes
amounts deferred by the NEOs in accordance with the provisions
of the Company’s 401(k) Plan. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the dollar amount recognized in fiscal year 2007 in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) for financial
statement reporting purposes related to restricted stock, and
therefore may include awards |
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
made in prior fiscal years for which forfeiture restrictions
lapsed in fiscal 2007. The amounts shown exclude the impact of
estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. For additional information as to the assumptions
made in valuation, see Note 13 to the financial statements
filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. See the Grants of
Plan Based Awards table below for information on awards of
restricted stock granted in fiscal 2007. |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the dollar amount recognized in fiscal year 2007
determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) for
financial statement reporting purposes related to stock options
and therefore may include awards made in prior fiscal years that
vested in fiscal 2007. The amounts shown exclude the impact of
estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. For additional information as to the assumptions
made in valuation, see Note 13 to the financial statements
filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. Amounts reflected above
are based on the Company’s accounting expense for these
awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that may be
recognized by the NEOs. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards
table below for information on options granted in fiscal 2007. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Includes the following 401(k) matching contributions and life
insurance premiums (for coverage in addition to that provided to
all Company employees) for fiscal 2007. Perquisites and other
personal benefits aggregating less than $10,000 in fiscal 2007
are not reflected. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k)
Match ($)
|
|
|
Premium ($)
|
|
|
Other
($)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
3,092
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
31,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The amount shown above for Dr. Terhanian includes $26,880,
which represents actual cost of the annual apartment allowance
provided to him during fiscal 2007. |
Each of the NEOs is a party to an employment agreement with the
Company that covers, among other items, the non-equity based
compensation described above. The material terms of such
employment agreements are discussed below in “Employment
Agreements” and in “Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control.” For further discussion
regarding the determination of base salary and incentive
compensation within the context of total compensation, see
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis
— Mix of Types of Compensation”
above.
Grants
of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal 2007
The following table and accompanying footnotes provide
information regarding grants of stock options and restricted
stock to our NEOs in fiscal 2007:
Grants of Plan
Based Awards in Fiscal 2007
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
Stock
|
|
|
All Option
Awards:
|
|
|
Exercise or
Base
|
|
|
Value of Stock
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: Number
of
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
|
|
|
Price of
Option
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Shares(#)
|
|
|
Underlying
Options(#)
|
|
|
Awards($/sh)(1)
|
|
|
Awards$(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
2/15/2007
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
426,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/2007
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
1,062,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/2007
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
569,000
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects exercise price for stock options granted, which was the
closing market price of the Company’s stock on the grant
date. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects full grant date fair value under
SFAS No. 123(R) of the restricted stock and the stock
options granted. For restricted stock, fair value is calculated
using the closing market price of the Company’s stock on
the date of grant. For stock options, fair value is calculated
using the Black Scholes value on the date of grant. For
additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation,
see Note 13 to the financial statements filed with the SEC
in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. |
Stock awards reflected in the table above represent awards of
time-based restricted stock. Stock options reflected in the
table were issued at fair market value on the date of the grant
and have a ten year term. In the case of both restricted stock
and options:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
25% of each award vests on the one-year anniversary date of the
grant and the balance vests ratably on a monthly basis over the
following 36 months;
|
| |
| |
•
|
vesting is accelerated upon the occurrence of a change in
control of the Company, and all unvested restricted stock and
options fully vest upon such an event;
|
| |
| |
•
|
vesting ceases with respect to restricted stock if the
executive’s employment is terminated for any reason
(voluntary or involuntary, including by reason of death or
disability);
|
| |
| |
•
|
vesting ceases with respect to options if the executive’s
employment is terminated for any reason (voluntary or
involuntary) other than by reason of death or disability, and is
accelerated upon the executive’s death or
disability; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the award agreements for restricted stock and options provide
that the restricted stock and options are forfeited if the
executive violates confidentiality, non-compete, and
non-solicitation restrictions.
|
29
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year End
The following table provides information regarding unexercised
stock options and unvested restricted stock awards held by our
NEOs as of June 30, 2007.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year End
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
of Shares or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Units of Stock
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options(#)
|
|
|
Options(#)
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Exercise
Price($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested(#)
|
|
|
Vested($)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
7/22/1999
|
(1)
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
7/21/2009
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/12/2002
|
(2)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
9/11/2012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/7/2003
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
11/6/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/27/2004
|
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,855
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
7/26/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/9/2004
|
(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
6.76
|
|
|
|
11/8/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/24/2005
|
(2)
|
|
|
166,667
|
|
|
|
153,333
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
5/23/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/28/2005
|
(2)
|
|
|
100,625
|
|
|
|
129,375
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
|
9/27/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
3/6/2006
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
|
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
7/27/2004
|
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24,375
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
7/26/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/24/2005
|
(2)
|
|
|
13,021
|
|
|
|
11,979
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
5/23/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
3/6/2000
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/12/2002
|
(2)
|
|
|
13,125
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
9/11/2012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/28/2004
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
1/27/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/27/2004
|
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
7/26/2014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/2005
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
7.94
|
|
|
|
1/2/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/24/2005
|
(2)
|
|
|
33,854
|
|
|
|
31,146
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
5/23/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/31/2006
|
(2)(5)
|
|
|
15,438
|
|
|
|
41,563
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
|
5/30/2015
|
|
|
|
27,708
|
|
|
|
148,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/15/2007
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
2/14/2017
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/2007
|
(2)(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
5/14/2017
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
535,000
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
1/1/1998
|
(6)
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/22/1999
|
(2)
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
7/21/2009
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/25/1999
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
7.06
|
|
|
|
10/24/2009
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/13/2002
|
(2)
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
8/12/2012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/24/2005
|
(2)
|
|
|
23,437
|
|
|
|
21,563
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
5/23/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options vested 1/3 on the one-year anniversary of the grant date
and 1/3 per year over the following two years. The vesting
schedule reflected that generally applicable to grants made
prior to September 1999. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Options vest 25% on the one-year anniversary of the grant date,
and the balance vests monthly over the remaining 36 months. |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Options vested immediately on the grant date. No vesting
schedule was included because the options were granted in lieu
of cash bonuses otherwise fully earned. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Options vested 25% on March 30, 2005, and the balance vests
monthly over the remaining 36 months. The initial 25%
vested earlier than the vesting schedule generally used by the
Compensation Committee because the effective date of the option
grant was delayed pending stockholder approval of the addition
of sufficient shares to the 1999 Incentive Plan to cover the
award. |
| |
|
(5) |
|
Shares of restricted stock vest 25% on the one-year anniversary
of the grant date, and the balance vests monthly over the
remaining 36 months. |
| |
|
(6) |
|
Options became fully vested on December 7, 1999, the date
of the Company’s Initial Public Offering. |
30
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Value is based on the market value of $5.35 for the
Company’s common stock, the closing market price of such
common stock as reported by NASDAQ on June 29, 2007, the
last trading day of fiscal 2007. |
Options
Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2007
The following table provides information with regard to the
amounts paid or received by the NEOs during fiscal 2007 as a
result of the exercise of stock options or the vesting of
restricted stock awards.
Fiscal 2007
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Value Realized
on
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized
on
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise(#)(1)
|
|
|
Exercise($)(2)
|
|
|
Acquired on
Vesting(#)(3)
|
|
|
Vesting($)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,292
|
|
|
|
57,342
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the number of stock options exercised by the NEOs
during fiscal 2007. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the market value at the time of exercise of the shares
purchased less the exercise price paid. |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the shares of common stock acquired upon vesting by the
NEOs during fiscal 2007. With respect to Mr. Vaden,
9,500 shares vested on May 31, 2007, and
792 shares vested on June 30, 2007. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects the market value of the shares on the respective
vesting dates. |
Employment
Agreements With Executives
The Agreements
and Responsibilities of NEOs
Gregory T. Novak serves as President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated
April 30, 2007 (the “Novak Agreement”). Ronald E.
Salluzzo serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company pursuant to an
Employment Agreement dated April 30, 2007 (the
“Salluzzo Agreement”). Leonard R. Bayer serves as
Executive Vice President, Chief Scientist, and Chief Technology
Officer of the Company pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated
April 30, 2007 (the “Bayer Agreement”). David B.
Vaden serves as President, North America and Global Operations
of the Company pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated
April 30, 2007 (the “Vaden Agreement”). George H.
Terhanian, PhD serves as President, Harris Interactive Europe
and Global Internet Research of the Company pursuant to an
Employment Agreement effective September 1, 2007, (the
“Terhanian Agreement”). The Novak Agreement, Salluzzo
Agreement, Bayer Agreement, Vaden Agreement, and Terhanian
Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Employment
Agreements.” The Novak Agreement, Bayer Agreement, Vaden
Agreement, and Terhanian Agreement each replaced prior
agreements between the respective executives and the Company.
Each of the Employment Agreements provides that the executive
will continue to be employed in the position described above;
provided, however, his responsibilities and title may be changed
to a position no less senior and executive in nature within the
Company. In the case of a change in control, his title,
reporting line, responsibilities, and duties may be changed in
line with the change in the part played by the Company in the
controlling person (for example, executive duties may be at a
divisional, subsidiary, or group level, if the Company becomes a
division, subsidiary, or group within the controlling person).
The Bayer Agreement does not require Mr. Bayer to devote
full time efforts to the performance of his duties, but does
require him to devote approximately sixty percent of the time
and efforts as he devoted to such duties prior to 2005.
31
Each of Mr. Novak’s and Mr. Bayer’s
agreements requires the Nominating and Governance Committee to
nominate and recommend him for election as a director at each
annual meeting of stockholders coinciding with the expiration of
his term as a director, but failure of the stockholders to elect
the executive does not constitute a breach of the agreement. The
agreements also require Mr. Novak and Mr. Bayer, as
applicable, to resign from the Board on the date on which his
employment terminates for any reason.
Term and
Termination of the Agreements
Each of the Employment Agreements terminates on
(i) June 30, 2008 (subject to renewal as described
below) or (ii) the executive’s death, unless the
executive’s employment is earlier terminated by either
party in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement.
Each of the agreements provides that on June 30, 2008 and
each June 30 thereafter, the executive’s employment will be
automatically extended for additional successive one year terms,
unless either the executive or the Company gives the other at
least three months written notice of non-renewal.
The Company and each executive may terminate the respective
employment agreements at any time. Under the Employment
Agreements, termination by the Company may be with or without
“Cause,” and termination by the executive may be with
or without “Good Reason. “Cause” includes:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
willful failure to perform duties after notice of such failure,
|
| |
| |
•
|
willful conduct that is materially and demonstrably injurious to
Company,
|
| |
| |
•
|
conviction or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony or
to any other crime which involves moral turpitude,
|
| |
| |
•
|
violation of non-competition, non-solicitation, or
confidentiality restrictions,
|
| |
| |
•
|
material violation of Company polices, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
material breach of terms of the applicable employment agreement.
|
“Good Reason” includes:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
material breach of the Company’s obligations, including any
assignment of duties not included within the scope provided in
the applicable employment agreement,
|
| |
| |
•
|
decrease in base salary or target bonus below the levels
originally specified in the agreement,
|
| |
| |
•
|
certain relocations of principal place of work, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
failure of any successor to the Company to be bound by the
applicable employment agreement.
|
The effect of termination of the executive under various
circumstances, including with Cause, without Cause, with Good
Reason, without Good Reason, on death or disability, and in the
case of a change in control, is detailed below in
“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control.”
Base Salary
and Bonus
Each of the Employment Agreements provides for base salary and
an annual target bonus. The amounts as of the date of each such
Agreement, which remain unchanged, are shown below and in the
case of Dr. Terhanian are subject to currency adjustment.
They are subject to annual review by the Compensation Committee,
but not reduction below the amounts shown below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base
Salary
|
|
|
Annual Target
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Novak
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
Ronald E. Salluzzo
|
|
$
|
335,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
$
|
330,000
|
|
|
$
|
135,000
|
|
|
David B. Vaden
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
George H. Terhanian
|
|
$
|
299,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
32
The Compensation Committee establishes the annual performance
requirements for earning bonuses.
Benefits and
Perquisites
Each of the Employment Agreements provides for vacation, expense
reimbursement and other employee benefits commensurate with
those provided by the Company to its senior executives generally
and for reimbursement of up to $2,500 in legal fees in
connection with negotiation of his employment agreement. In
addition, the agreements provide for Company paid term life
insurance, in addition to Company paid term life insurance
benefits provided to all executive officers, with annual
premiums in the amount of $1,382 for Mr. Novak, $1,776 for
Mr. Salluzzo, $1,754 for Mr. Bayer, $250 for
Mr. Vaden, and an amount to be determined when a $250,000
term insurance policy is procured for Dr. Terhanian.
The Terhanian Agreement provides for an apartment allowance of a
maximum of $2,436 per month, reimbursement for two round trip
economy class airfares for personal trips to the United States
per year, income tax preparation and assistance during
Dr. Terhanian’s assignment in the United Kingdom and
final preparation and filing of necessary tax returns upon his
return to the United States.
Other
Obligations
Each NEO is subject to certain non-competition, non-solicitation
and confidentiality covenants contained in his employment
agreement, and post-termination payments to him are, in part, in
consideration of such obligations. The duration of
non-competition and non-solicitation agreements for each
executive is described below in “Potential Payments on
Termination or Change in Control.”
The Bayer Agreement provides that in the event of termination of
Mr. Bayer’s employment due to expiration of the term
or for any other reason except death or disability,
Mr. Bayer has the option of agreeing to provide transition,
advice, and consulting services to the Company for a period of
27 months (the “Consulting Period”). Such
services shall be those advisory services reasonably requested
from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
in order to give the Company the benefit of
Mr. Bayer’s existing knowledge of the market research
industry and the historical operations, products, technologies
and methodologies of the Company. The Bayer Agreement further
provides that such consulting services (i) shall not
involve the degree of effort or responsibility commensurate with
Executive’s prior employment duties, (ii) shall not
require travel, (iii) shall not require physical presence
in the Company’s offices or a set schedule, (iv) shall
not require participation in client meetings, and (v) shall
not require the production of written work product. In
consideration for such services, the Company is obligated to pay
Mr. Bayer:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the aggregate sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars
($660,000.00), payable in installments of $25,000 each due on
the first day of each month, commencing on the first day of the
first calendar month after the termination of his
employment, and
|
| |
| |
•
|
health and medical benefits during the Consulting Period or
reimbursement for coverage reasonably comparable to that
previously provided by the Company.
|
The Bayer Agreement imposes confidentiality, non-competition,
and non-solicitation restrictions on Mr. Bayer during the
Consulting Period.
33
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control
Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, the Company is obligated
to make certain payments to the applicable executive upon
termination of employment, including without limitation by
reason of death or disability, or upon a change in control of
the Company. Such obligations are summarized in the table below
for each covered event.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Termination
Payment Summary(1)(2)
|
|
Event
|
|
Gregory T.
Novak
|
|
Ronald E.
Salluzzo
|
|
Leonard R.
Bayer
|
|
David B.
Vaden
|
|
George H.
Terhanian
|
|
|
|
Termination Without Cause, By
Company At End of Term, or by NEO With Good Reason
|
|
(a) 18 months Base Salary if
termination is before 6/30/08; 24 months Base Salary if
termination is after 6/30/08(8)
(b) Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(c) Health Benefits: 15 months if termination is before
6/30/08 24 months if termination is after 6/30/08 (8)
(d) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $759,816 Comprised of:
(a) $750,000
(b) $0
(c) $11,779, and
(d) $0
|
|
(a) 12 months Base Salary (8)
(b) Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(c) Health Benefits — 12 months(8)
(d) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $341,177 Comprised of:
(a) $335,000
(b) $0
(c) $6,177, and
(d) $0
|
|
(a) $660,000
(6) (8)
(b) Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(c) Health Benefits — 12 months(8)
(d) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $663,383 Comprised of:
(a) $660,000,
(b) $0,
(c) $3,383, and
(d) $0
|
|
(a) 12 months Base
(b) Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(c) Health Benefits — 12 months(8)
(d) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $357,853 Comprised of: (a) $350,000,
(b) $0,
(c) $7,853, and
(d) $0
|
|
(a) 12 months base salary(8)
(b) Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(c) Health Benefits — 12 months(8)
(d) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $302,383 Comprised of: (a) $299,000,
(b) $0
(c) $3,383, and
(d) $0
|
34
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Termination
Payment Summary(1)(2)
|
|
Event
|
|
Gregory T.
Novak
|
|
Ronald E.
Salluzzo
|
|
Leonard R.
Bayer
|
|
David B.
Vaden
|
|
George H.
Terhanian
|
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
(a) Salary, bonus, and health
benefits are same as Termination Without Cause; except:
(b) Severance is 24 months (5)
(c) Health Benefits — 24 months (5)
(d) Stock Options and Awards 100% Vest
(e) 6 Months Out-Placement (5)(9)
(f) Tax Gross-Up (5)(9)
Total
assuming no termination of employment: $248,340 (3)
Comprised of (d) $248,340
Total assuming termination of employment: $1,268,082 (3)
Comprised of (a) $759,816 (b) $250,000
(c) $3,926
(d) $248,340
(e) $6,000, and
(f) $0(7)
|
|
(a) Salary, bonus, and health
benefits are same as Termination Without Cause; except:
(b) Stock Options and Awards 100% Vest
(c) 6 Months Out-Placement (5)(9)
(d) Tax Gross-Up (5)(9)
Total
assuming no termination of employment: $0 (3)
Total assuming termination of employment: $347,177 (3)
Comprised of: (a) $341,177
(b) $0
(c) $6,000, and
(d) $0(7)
|
|
(a) Salary, bonus, and health
benefits are same as Termination Without Cause; except:
(b) Stock Options and Awards 100% Vest
(c) 6 Months Out-Placement (5)(9)
Total
assuming no termination of employment: $11,500 (3) Comprised of
(b) $11,500
Total assuming termination of employment: $677,500 (3)
Comprised of:
(a) $663,383 (6)
(b) $11,500, and
(c) $6,000
|
|
(a) Salary, bonus, and health
benefits are same as Termination Without Cause; except:
(b) Stock Options and Awards 100% Vest
(c) 6 Months Out-Placement (5)(9)
(d) Tax Gross-Up (5)(9)
Total
assuming no termination of employment: $50,278 (3)
Comprised of (b) $50,278
Total assuming termination of employment: $414,131 (3) Comprised
of: (a) $357,853 (b) $50,278 (c) $6,000, and
(d) $0(7)
|
|
(a) Salary, bonus, and health
benefits are same as Termination Without Cause; except:
(b) Stock Options and Awards 100% Vest
(c) 6 Months Out-Placement (5)9)
Total
assuming no termination of employment:
$20,700 (3)
Comprised of (b) $20,700
Total assuming termination of employment:
$329,083 (3)
Comprised of:
(a) $302,383
(b) $20,700, and
(c) $6,000
|
35
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Termination
Payment Summary(1)(2)
|
|
Event
|
|
Gregory T.
Novak
|
|
Ronald E.
Salluzzo
|
|
Leonard R.
Bayer
|
|
David B.
Vaden
|
|
George H.
Terhanian
|
|
|
|
Termination With Cause by Company
or by NEO Without Good Reason
|
|
(a) If termination is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$0
Comprised of:
(a) $0, and
(b) $0
|
|
(a) If termination is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$0
Comprised of:
(a) $0, and
(b) $0
|
|
$660,000(6)
(8)
(a) If termination is in second half of fiscal year —
Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$0
Comprised of:
(a) $0, and
(b) $0
|
|
(a) If termination is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$0
Comprised of:
(a) $0, and
(b) $0
|
|
(a) If termination is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options and Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$0
Comprised of:
(a) $0, and
(b) $0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death
|
|
(a) If death is in second half of
fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $248,340 Comprised of: (a) $0
(b) $248,340, and
(c) $0
|
|
(a) If death is in second half of
fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4) (10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$0
Comprised of:
(a) $0 (b) $0, and (c) $0
|
|
(a) $660,000 (b) If death is in
second half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4) (10)
(c) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(d) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$671,500
Comprised of:
(a) $660,000,
(b) $0,
(c) $11,500, and
(d) $0
|
|
(a) If death is in second half of
fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4) (10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$50,278
Comprised of:
(a)0
(b) $50,278, and
(c) $0
|
|
(a) If death is in second half of
fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4) (10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3):
$20,700
Comprised of:
(a) 0
(b) $20,700, and
(c) $0
|
36
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Termination
Payment Summary(1)(2)
|
|
Event
|
|
Gregory T.
Novak
|
|
Ronald E.
Salluzzo
|
|
Leonard R.
Bayer
|
|
David B.
Vaden
|
|
George H.
Terhanian
|
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
(a) If disability is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) $750,000 if termination is before 6/30/08 (3)(8) $1,000,000
if termination is after 6/30/08 (3)(8)
(c) Health Benefits 15 months if termination is before
6/30/08 (8) 24 months if termination is after 6/30/08 (8)
(d) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(e) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $1,010,119 Comprised of: (a) $0,
(b) $750,000,
(c) $11,779,
(d) $248,340, and
(e) $0
|
|
(a) If disability is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $0 Comprised of: (a) $0,
(b) $0, and
(c) $0
|
|
(a) $660,000 (b) If disability is
in second half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(c) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(d) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $671,500 Comprised of: (a) $660,000,
(b) $0,
(c) $11,500, and (d) $0
|
|
(a) If disability is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $50,278 Comprised of: (a) $0,
(b) $50,278, and
(c) $0
|
|
(a) If disability is in second
half of fiscal year — Prorated Bonus (4)(10)
(b) Stock Options Granted At Least One Year Previous —
100% Vest
(c) Stock Awards Cease Vesting
Total
(3): $20,700 Comprised of:
(a) 0,
(b) $20,700, and
(c) $0
|
37
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All post-termination payments are linked to obligations of
confidentiality and not to compete or solicit customers and
employees. Non-compete and non-solicitation obligations extend
during the following periods post-termination for the NEOs: |
| |
|
|
|
Mr. Novak
|
|
18 months if termination is
prior to 6/30/08 and 24 months thereafter
|
|
Mr. Salluzzo
|
|
12 months
|
|
Mr. Bayer
|
|
12 months, or if longer, the
period during which consulting services are provided
|
|
Mr. Vaden
|
|
12 months
|
|
Dr. Terhanian
|
|
12 months
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
“Cause” and “Good Reason” are described
above in “Employment Agreements — Term and
Termination of the Agreements” |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Total is based on assumption that termination or change of
control occurred on June 30, 2007, the last day of the
Company’s most recent fiscal year, and that all un-vested,
un-exercised stock options and restricted stock awards still
subject to forfeiture are valued at the closing market price of
the Company’s common stock on that date. Aggregate total
compensation is shown first, followed by the subtotal for each
category listed above in the same order. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Performance bonus is prorated for the partial-year period ending
on the termination date (the “Partial Period”). The
prorated bonus is based on the same metrics as then in effect
for calculation of bonuses on an annual basis (e.g. after-tax
earnings) and is calculated by (1) dividing actual
performance as of the end of the Applicable Calculation Quarter
(described below) by target performance for the Applicable
Calculation Quarter, and then (2) using the resulting
percentage in determining the dollar value bonus that would have
been paid under the Company’s bonus plan had such
percentage performance been achieved for the full fiscal year,
and then (3) multiplying the result by a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of days elapsed in the fiscal
year prior to the termination date and the denominator of which
is 365. If the Termination Date is in the first half of a fiscal
quarter the “Applicable Calculation Quarter” is the
fiscal quarter most recently ended before the Termination Date,
and if the Termination Date is in the second half of a fiscal
quarter, the Applicable Calculation Quarter is the first fiscal
quarter ending after the Termination Date. |
| |
|
|
|
Calculations in table assume termination on June 30, 2007,
the last day of the Company’s most recent fiscal year. The
executive’s full bonus for the fiscal year, therefore, has
been earned and is payable as a result of services already
rendered. Therefore, the fiscal year 2007 bonus payment is not
an incremental payment due to termination, and as such is not
reflected in the table. |
| |
|
(5) |
|
Applies only if NEO is terminated without Cause or leaves with
Good Reason during the first year following the change in
control (so-called “double-trigger”). |
| |
|
(6) |
|
Payment contingent upon Mr. Bayer agreeing to provide
consulting services for three years post-termination. |
| |
|
(7) |
|
Value of tax
gross-up is
calculated assuming that change of control occurred on
June 30, 2007, the last day of the Company’s most
recent fiscal year, and further assuming NEO’s employment
is terminated on the date of change in control. Because
June 30, 2007 is the last day of the fiscal year, NEO would
be entitled to full fiscal year 2007 bonus but no fiscal year
2008 pro-rated bonus. |
| |
|
(8) |
|
Applicable amounts are payable in installments over applicable
term. Payments may be postponed for a
6-month
period to avoid application of Section 409A of the IRC. |
| |
|
(9) |
|
Applicable amounts are payable in a lump sum on termination
date. Payments may be postponed for a
6-month
period to avoid application of Section 409A of the IRC. |
| |
|
(10) |
|
Applicable amounts are payable in a lump sum on the date on
which bonuses are otherwise paid by the Company. |
38
The following table provides information with regard to the
compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors
during fiscal 2007, and with regard to compensation received by
Dr. Wirthlin for the portion of the year during which he
was a non-employee director. Messrs. Novak and Bayer
received no compensation in their respective roles as directors.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL 2007
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash($)
|
|
Stock
Awards($)(1)(2)(3)
|
|
Total($)
|
|
|
|
George Bell
|
|
|
55,167
|
|
|
|
117,446
|
|
|
|
172,613
|
|
|
David Brodsky
|
|
|
40,167
|
|
|
|
74,491
|
|
|
|
114,358
|
|
|
Stephen D. Harlan
|
|
|
46,833
|
|
|
|
128,500
|
|
|
|
175,333
|
|
|
James R. Riedman
|
|
|
45,167
|
|
|
|
121,333
|
|
|
|
166,500
|
|
|
Subrata K. Sen
|
|
|
45,167
|
|
|
|
104,947
|
|
|
|
150,114
|
|
|
Howard L. Shecter
|
|
|
53,500
|
|
|
|
121,597
|
|
|
|
175,097
|
|
|
Antoine G. Treuille
|
|
|
40,167
|
|
|
|
77,222
|
|
|
|
117,389
|
|
|
Richard B. Wirthlin
|
|
|
13,833
|
|
|
|
10,944
|
(4)
|
|
|
21,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the compensation cost for stock awards for each
director recognized by the Company during fiscal 2007 in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), and therefore may
include awards made in prior fiscal years that vested in fiscal
2007. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For
additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation,
see Note 13 to the financial statements filed with the SEC
in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
For awards made during fiscal 2007, the full grant date fair
value is shown in the table below. All of the awards were in the
form of restricted stock, the fair value of which is calculated
using the closing market price of the Company’s stock on
the date of grant. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Stock
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares(#)
|
|
Awards$(2)
|
|
|
|
George Bell
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
11,704
|
|
|
|
76,427
|
|
|
David Brodsky
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
6,704
|
|
|
|
43,777
|
|
|
Stephen D. Harlan
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
11,704
|
|
|
|
76,427
|
|
|
James R. Riedman
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
11,704
|
|
|
|
76,427
|
|
|
Subrata K. Sen
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
9,204
|
|
|
|
60,102
|
|
|
Howard L. Shecter
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
11,704
|
|
|
|
76,427
|
|
|
Antoine G. Treuille
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
6,704
|
|
|
|
43,777
|
|
|
Richard B. Wirthlin
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
6,704
|
|
|
|
43,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Following are all equity awards outstanding for each director as
of June 30, 2007 (“Option Awards” reflect
unexercised grants of stock options, whether or not vested, and
“Stock Awards” reflect awards of shares of restricted
stock that remain subject to forfeiture): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock
Options(#)
|
|
Stock
Awards(#)
|
|
|
|
George Bell
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
David Brodsky
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
Stephen D. Harlan
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
James R. Riedman
|
|
|
86,333
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
Subrata K. Sen
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
Howard L. Shecter
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
Antoine G. Treuille
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents 6,704 shares of restricted stock, of which
1,676 shares with a grant date fair value of $10,944 vested
prior to Dr. Wirthlin’s retirement as a director and
5,028 shares with a grant date fair value of $32,833 were
forfeited upon such retirement. |
Each non-employee director of the Company received an annual
retainer of $37,500 prior to November 1, 2006, and $41,500
thereafter. Supplemental annual cash compensation in the
following amounts is paid with respect to the following
positions:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Before
11/1/06
|
|
|
11/1/06 and
After
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
Lead Director
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
Chairman of the Audit Committee
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
Chairman of the Compensation
Committee
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
Chairman of the Research and
Development Committee
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
In addition, each non-employee director of the Company receives
an annual grant of restricted stock, previously on November 1 of
each year timed to coincide with the annual meeting, but
commencing in 2008, on November 15, the Company’s
regular quarterly date for awards under its 1999 Incentive Plan
(and 2007 Incentive Plan, if approved by the stockholders). The
value of the annual grant of the restricted stock is intended to
equal as closely as practical the annual cash retainer paid to
non-employee directors ($41,500 as of November 1, 2006). In
fiscal 2007, the number of shares of restricted stock to be
received was calculated based upon the average closing price for
the Company’s stock for the four weeks ending prior to
November 1 of each year, which was $6.19 as of November 1,
2006. Pursuant to this formula, each non-employee director
received a grant of 6,704 shares of restricted stock on
November 1, 2006. Beginning in fiscal 2008, the number of
shares of restricted stock will be calculated based upon the
closing price for the Company’s stock on November 15.
Each restricted stock grant vests 1/12th on the last day of
each month, and any unvested stock is forfeited upon termination
of an individual’s service as a director. Vesting will be
accelerated upon a change in control of the Company.
Supplemental grants of the following numbers of shares of
restricted stock are made on November 1 or November 15, as
the case may be, of each year with respect to the following
positions, subject to the same forfeiture rules as the other
grants to non-employee directors:
| |
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
5,000
|
|
Lead Director
|
|
5,000
|
|
Chairman of the Audit Committee
|
|
5,000
|
|
Chairman of the Compensation
Committee
|
|
5,000
|
|
Chairman of the Research and
Development Committee
|
|
2,500
|
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PERSONS
Transactions With
Richard B. Wirthlin
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
September 8, 2004 among the Company, Capital Merger Sub,
LLC, and the stockholders of Wirthlin Worldwide, Inc.
(“Wirthlin”), Wirthlin became a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company and Dr. Richard B. Wirthlin was
elected to the Company’s Board. Dr. Wirthlin resigned
from the Board on January 31, 2007.
Dr. Wirthlin is a member in Richard B. Wirthlin Family LLC
(the “Wirthlin LLC”), in which he holds a 34.3% direct
interest and 100% beneficial interest. The Wirthlin LLC is the
landlord under a Lease Agreement with Wirthlin, dated
April 23, 2002 (the “Wirthlin LLC Lease”), as
amended pursuant to a First Amendment dated May 10, 2007
(the “Amendment”), covering facilities used by
Wirthlin located at 1920 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia.
Under the terms of the Wirthlin LLC Lease, Wirthlin paid base
rent in the amount of $47,050 per month between July 1,
2006 and May 31, 2007, for an aggregate of $517,550.
40
The Amendment provided for a reduction in the square footage of
rented space by 5,192 square feet, a payment on
June 1, 2007 of $230,263 by Wirthlin to the Wirthlin LLC,
and a reduction in base rental payments over the remaining lease
term. Pursuant to the Amendment, for the period between
June 1, 2007 and April 30, 2010, the aggregate base
rent under the Wirthlin LLC Lease is $1,229,373, payable
monthly. In addition to base rent, during the entire term of the
Wirthlin LLC Lease Wirthlin is obligated to reimburse Wirthlin
LLC for increases in operating expenses for the premises over
the amount of such expenses in calendar 2002, which increased
amount resulted in a payment of $45,379 for the period
July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. For the period
July 1, 2006 through the end of the lease term on
April 30, 2010, Wirthlin’s obligation under the
Wirthlin LLC Lease, including base rentals, the one-time payment
with respect to the Amendment, and increased operating expense
payments (assuming no further increase after June 30,
2007) totals an aggregate of $2,151,139. Dr. Wirthlin
has a beneficial interest in 100% of the payments under the
Wirthlin LLC Lease.
WB&H Investments, in which the Wirthlin LLC holds an 88.4%
interest, is the landlord under a Lease Agreement between that
entity and Wirthlin, dated September 15, 1985, and amended
as of August 23, 2005 (the “WB&H Lease”),
covering facilities used by Wirthlin located at 1998 Columbia
Lane, Orem, Utah. Under the original terms of the WB&H
Lease, Wirthlin was obligated to pay base rent in the amount of
$12,444 per month, subject to annual adjustment based upon 60%
of annual increases in the consumer price index, so that for the
period from July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006
Wirthlin paid base rent of $12,537 per month, and for the period
January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 Wirthlin paid
base rent of $11,493 per month. In addition, Wirthlin is
responsible for payment of its proportionate share of annual
operating expenses, for the premises in which the space covered
by the WB&H Lease is located, in excess of $2.56 per square
usable foot, and Wirthlin’s share equaled $15,544 between
July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007. For the period from
July 1, 2006 through the end of the term of the WB&H
Lease on August 31, 2008, Wirthlin’s obligation under
the WB&H Lease totals $330,524, including the aggregate of
base rent payments and operating expense payments, which amount
will increase on January 1, 2008 based upon any increases
in the consumer price index and operating expenses, and
Dr. Wirthlin’s beneficial interest is $292,184.
On July 5, 2006, Dr. Wirthlin sold 400,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock in a privately-negotiated
sale with the Company through its share repurchase program. The
shares were held indirectly through the Wirthlin Family Trust,
over which Dr. Wirthlin has sole voting and investment
power, and were sold to the Company at a per share price of
$5.54. The per share price was based upon the discounted average
per share price of the Company’s common stock at market
close for the five trading days ended July 5, 2006. The
aggregate purchase price received by Dr. Wirthlin was
$2,216,000.
Each of the transactions with Dr. Wirthlin was approved by
the Audit Committee of the Board, composed solely of independent
directors.
Policies and
Procedures for Review of Transactions with Related
Persons
The Board has adopted a written Policy and Procedures With
Respect to Related Party Transactions (the
“Procedure”). The Procedure covers all transactions
(“Covered Transactions”) in which the Company is a
participant and a Related Person (described below) has a direct
or indirect interest if the amount involved exceeds $120,000, or
if the applicable Related Person is a director, executive
officer, or spouse of a director or executive officer, $50,000.
“Related Persons” include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of the
Company’s last fiscal year was, a director or executive
officer of the Company or a nominee to become a director of the
Company,
|
| |
| |
•
|
any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than
5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities,
|
| |
| |
•
|
any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons,
which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse,
sibling,
mother-in-law,
father-in-law,
son-in-law,
daughter-in-law,
|
41
|
|
|
| |
|
brother-in-law,
or
sister-in-law
of the director, executive officer, nominee or more than 5%
beneficial owner,
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the
household of any such director, executive officer, nominee or
more than 5% beneficial owner, and,
|
| |
| |
•
|
any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the
foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in
a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater
beneficial ownership interest.
|
The Procedure requires review and approval of Covered
Transactions by the Audit Committee of the Board, or in certain
cases where delay is not practical, by the Chair of the Audit
Committee with reporting to the full Committee. Annual review is
required for ongoing transactions. In its review, the Audit
Committee will consider whether each Covered Transaction is in,
or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company
and its stockholders. Covered Transactions may be approved in
situations, among others, in which:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the Company may obtain products or services of a nature,
quantity or quality, or on other terms, that are not readily
available from alternative sources, or
|
| |
| |
•
|
the Company receives from or provides products or services to
the Related Person on an arm’s length basis on terms
comparable to those provided to unrelated third parties, or on
terms comparable to those provided to employees generally.
|
The Audit Committee has granted standing pre-approval for
Covered Transactions that involve:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
compensation of executive officers or directors required to be
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board,
|
| |
| |
•
|
transactions in which the Related Person’s only
relationship with the company involved is as (i) a
director, (ii) an employee other than an executive officer,
or (iii) less than 10% stockholder and the amount involved
does not exceed $1,000,000 or 2% of that company’s annual
revenues,
|
| |
| |
•
|
charitable contributions when the Related Person’s only
relationship to the charity is as a director or employee other
than an executive officer and the aggregate amount does not
exceed the lesser of 2% of the charity’s annual receipts
and $120,000, or if the applicable Related Person is a director,
executive officer, or spouse of one of them, $50,000, or
|
| |
| |
•
|
transactions in which all stockholders receive proportional
benefits, and those involving competitive bids, regulated
services and charges, or certain routine banking services.
|
ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL
NOMINEES.
Vote
Required
If a quorum is present and voting at the Annual Meeting, the
four nominees for Class II directors receiving the highest
number of affirmative votes of the shares of Harris Interactive
common stock present in person or represented by proxy and
entitled to vote will be elected as Class II directors.
Only votes cast for a nominee will be counted. Abstentions,
broker non-votes and instructions on the accompanying proxy card
to withhold authority to vote for one or more nominees will
result in the respective nominees receiving fewer votes.
However, the number of votes otherwise received by the nominee
will not be reduced by such action. In the absence of contrary
instructions, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies
received by them in the accompanying form of proxy
“FOR” the nominees for director listed below. In the
event that any nominee is unable to or declines to serve as a
director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be
voted for any nominee who is designated by the present Board of
Directors to fill the vacancy. As of the date
42
of this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors is not aware
that any nominee is unable or will decline to serve as a
director.
Summary of the
Proposal
Harris Interactive’s Board is currently divided into three
classes, with the classes of directors serving for staggered
three-year terms that expire in successive years. Class II
currently has four members, Stephen D. Harlan, Subrata K. Sen,
Howard L. Shecter, and Antoine G. Treuille, each of whose terms
expire as of the date of the Annual Meeting. The Board has
determined to reduce the size of the Board from nine to eight
directors effective November 1, 2007, and correspondingly
to reduce Class II from four to three members. The
Nominating and Governance Committee proposes that the nominees
described below, each of whom is currently serving as a
Class II director, be re-elected as Class II directors
for a term of three years, or in each case until their
successors are duly elected and qualified.
Nominees to Board
of Directors
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class and Year in
Which
|
|
|
|
|
Board
|
|
Name
|
|
Principal
Occupation
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
|
Term Will
Expire
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Committees
|
|
|
|
Mr. Stephen D. Harlan
|
|
Chairman, Harlan Enterprises LLC
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Class II 2010
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
Audit (Chairman), Nominating and
Governance
|
|
Mr. Howard L. Shecter
|
|
Senior Partner with the law firm of
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Class II 2010
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Lead Director; Nominating and
Governance (Chairman), Audit, Compensation
|
|
Mr. Antoine G. Treuille
|
|
Partner, Altamont Capital Partners,
LLC
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Class II 2010
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Compensation, Nominating and
Governance
|
Stephen D. Harlan has served as a director of Harris
Interactive since January 2004. Since 2001, he has been the
Chairman of Harlan Enterprises LLC, a specialized real estate
firm investing in commercial real estate. Prior to joining
Harlan Enterprises, Mr. Harlan was Chairman of the real
estate firm H.G. Smithy from 1993 to 2001. Prior to that, he was
Vice Chairman of KPMG Peat Marwick, where he also served on
KPMG’s International Council, Board of Directors and
Management Committee. In June 1995, President Clinton appointed
him to the District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and
Management Assistance Authority, where he served as Vice
Chairman until September 1998. Mr. Harlan currently serves
as a director of Friedman, Billings Ramsey Group, ING Direct
Bank, and Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. He is also a director of
Medstar Health, a director of the Loughran Foundation, and a
Trustee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Howard L. Shecter has served as a director of Harris
Interactive since November 2001. Mr. Shecter was elected to
the Board of Directors of Harris Interactive pursuant to the
terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger under which Total
Research Corporation became part of the Company (the “TRC
Merger Agreement”). Prior to joining the Board of Directors
of Harris Interactive, Mr. Shecter served as a director of
Total Research Corporation from June 1998 to November 2001.
Mr. Shecter is a Senior Partner with the law firm of
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and has been with that
firm since 1968, serving as the Managing Partner from 1979 to
1983 and as Chairman of the Executive Committee in 1985.
Mr. Shecter is also a director of Ashbridge Corporation,
Ashbridge Investment Management and Heintz Investment Co.
Antoine G. Treuille has served as a director of Harris
Interactive since January 2004. Mr. Treuille is Managing
Partner of Altamont Capital Partners, LLC in New York City, a
position he has held since June 2006. He also continues to serve
as Executive Managing Partner of Mercantile Capital Partners in
New York City, a position he has held since September 2000.
Prior to Mercantile Capital Partners, Mr. Treuille was
President of Charter Pacific Corporation, an investment banking
firm he founded in New York City,
43
from 1996 to 1998. Before that, he served in executive roles at
Desai Capital Management, Entrecanales Y Travora Inc. and
Citibank N.A. in New York City, as well as Le Credit Chimique in
Paris, France. Mr. Treuille currently serves on the boards
of Eramet and Societe Bic, both in Paris. Mr. Treuille
formerly served as Chairman of the Board of Loehmanns’
Holdings Inc., as well as Eye Care Centers of America.
Directors Not
Standing for Election
The members of the Board of Directors who are not standing for
election at this year’s Annual Meeting are set forth below.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class and Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Term Will
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
|
|
Name
|
|
Occupation
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Expire
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Committees
|
|
|
|
Mr. Leonard R. Bayer
|
|
Executive Vice
President, Chief
Scientist and Chief Technology Officer of Harris Interactive
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
Class I 2009
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Research and Development
|
|
Mr. George Bell
|
|
Special Venture Partner with
General Catalyst Partners
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Class I 2009
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Board Chairman, Nominating and
Governance
|
|
Mr. David Brodsky
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
Class I 2009
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Audit,
Compensation,
Nominating and Governance
|
|
Mr. Gregory T. Novak
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer of
Harris Interactive
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Class III 2008
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Research and Development
|
|
Mr. James R. Riedman
|
|
Chairman of Phoenix
Footwear Group, Inc.
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
|
Class III 2008
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Compensation
(Chairman);
Audit;
Nominating and
Governance
|
|
Dr. Subrata K. Sen
|
|
Professor, Yale
University School of Management
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Class II 2007
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Research and Development
(Chairman),
Nominating and Governance
|
Leonard R. Bayer is Harris Interactive’s Executive
Vice President, Chief Scientist and Chief Technology Officer. He
has been employed by and served as a director of Harris
Interactive since July 1978. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Bayer worked for Practice Development Corporation from
August 1976 to July 1978, where he served as Vice President of
Research and Development. From September 1975 to August 1976,
Mr. Bayer was a member of the faculty of the University of
Rochester School of Medicine, where he taught mathematical
statistics.
George Bell has served as a director of the Harris
Interactive since January 2004. Since April 2005, Mr. Bell
has been a Special Venture Partner at General Catalyst Partners,
a private equity firm headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts
that invests in entrepreneurs building technology-enabled
companies. Mr. Bell has been involved in the creation and
growth of consumer businesses for 25 years. Prior to
joining General Catalyst, Mr. Bell served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Upromise, Inc. from June 2001 to
January 2005. Prior to joining Upromise, Mr. Bell was
Chairman and CEO of Excite@Home, where he led the
$7 billion 1999 merger of Excite and@Home. Previously,
Mr. Bell was a producer and writer of documentary programs,
a winner of four Emmy Awards and a founder of the Outdoor Life
cable network.
44
David Brodsky has served as a director of Harris
Interactive since November 2001. Mr. Brodsky was elected to
the Board of Directors of Harris Interactive pursuant to the
terms of the TRC Merger Agreement. Prior to joining the Board of
Directors of Harris Interactive, Mr. Brodsky served as a
director of Total Research Corporation from June 1998 through
November 2001 and as Chairman of its Board of Directors from
July 1998 to November 2001. Mr. Brodsky has been a private
investor for the past nine years and currently serves as a
director of Southern Union Company.
Gregory T. Novak is Harris Interactive’s President
and Chief Executive Officer, positions he has held since April
2004 and September 2005, respectively. He has served as a
director of Harris Interactive since September 2005. From May
2005 to September 2005, Mr. Novak served as the
Company’s acting Chief Executive Officer and from April
2004 to September 2005, he served as the Company’s Chief
Operating Officer. From July 2003 to March 2004, Mr. Novak
served as the Company’s President, U.S. Operations and
from July 2001 to June 2003, served as its Group President,
Strategic Marketing Solutions and Business and Consulting. From
July 2000 to July 2001, Mr. Novak served as the
Company’s Group President, Strategic Marketing Solutions
and from June 1999 through June 2000, served as the President of
its Internet division. Prior to joining Harris Interactive, from
August 1996 to June 1999, Mr. Novak worked for Lightnin, a
chemical process engineering and manufacturing company, most
recently as Vice President, General Manager of Lightnin Americas.
James R. Riedman has served as a director of Harris
Interactive since October 1989. Mr. Riedman currently
serves as the Chairman of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc., a
publicly traded manufacturer of footwear, a position he has held
since 1996. He has served as a director of that company since
1993 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1996 to June
2004. In addition, Mr. Riedman has served as a principal in
CE Capital, LLC since 2001. From 1987 to 2001, Mr. Riedman
served as the President of the Riedman Corporation, a real
estate holding company and an insurance agency, and he has
served as a Director of that corporation since 1987 . From April
1984 to January 1987, Mr. Riedman served as Senior Vice
President of Transamerica Financial Systems and Concepts.
Mr. Riedman also worked for the Balboa Insurance Group from
January 1983 to April 1984, where he served as Director of
Corporate Planning.
Subrata K. Sen, PhD has served as a director of Harris
Interactive since January 2004. Dr. Sen currently holds the
Joseph F. Cullman Chair as Professor of Organization, Management
and Marketing, in the School of Management at Yale University,
where he has been a member of the faculty since 1983. Prior to
Yale, Dr. Sen taught graduate courses in management at the
University of Rochester, the University of Chicago and the
University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Sen is the author of
over 50 academic research papers on marketing research,
advertising, political science, statistical analysis and other
subjects. He has also consulted on a variety of topics with many
Fortune 100 companies.
APPROVAL OF 2007
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
APPROVAL
OF THE 2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Vote
Required
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
of our common stock present or represented at the meeting is
required for the approval of the 2007 Incentive Plan. Broker
non-votes with respect to this matter will not be treated as a
vote “for” or a vote “against” the matter,
although they will be counted in determining if a quorum is
present. However, abstentions will be considered in determining
the number of votes required to attain a majority of the shares
present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote.
Accordingly, an abstention from voting by a stockholder present
in person or by proxy at the meeting has the same legal effect
as a vote “against” the matter because it represents a
share present or represented at the meeting and entitled to
vote, thereby increasing the number of affirmative votes
required to approve this proposal.
45
Summary of the
Proposal
The Company’s stockholders are being asked to approve the
Company’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2007
Incentive Plan”).
The IRC and applicable regulations provide that each plan
pursuant to which Harris Interactive can grant incentive options
qualifying for tax treatment under Section 422(b) of the
IRC, must be approved by the Company’s stockholders at
least every ten years. The 1999 Incentive Plan is such a plan
and was last approved in 1999. Thus, approval by the
stockholders is a pre-condition to the Company’s ability to
continue to grant incentive options after 2009. In anticipation
of this deadline, the stockholders are being asked to approve
the 2007 Incentive Plan. Moreover, the adoption of
Section 409A of the IRC would subject recipients of certain
grants under the 1999 Incentive Plan, including grants at less
than fair market value, to an additional tax. Unlike the 1999
Incentive Plan, the 2007 Incentive Plan requires that all awards
be made at fair market value.
The principal changes between the 2007 Incentive Plan and the
1999 Incentive Plan are the number of shares available
thereunder, the final maturity date for issuance of incentive
stock options, and the addition of a requirement that grants be
made at fair market value. Other administrative and
non-substantive provisions have been added, including provisions
to avoid the impact of Section 409A.
The 2007 Incentive Plan will permit 3,000,000 shares to be
issued. In addition, as of September 4, 2007 there were
outstanding options under the 1999 Incentive Plan to purchase an
aggregate of 6,094,302 shares, and there were
4,851 shares of common stock available for future grants
under the 1999 Incentive Plan. If approved, the 2007 Incentive
Plan would increase the number of shares issuable by the Company
under long term incentive plans for the first time since the
2004 stockholder-approved increase with respect to the 1999
Incentive Plan.
Whether or not the 2007 Incentive Plan is approved by the
stockholders, the 1999 Incentive Plan will continue in effect in
its current form, subject to the existing limitations on the
maximum number of shares available under it and the ability of
the Company to grant incentive options after 2009.
The shares underlying the 2007 Incentive Plan, if approved,
would be available for issuance by the Compensation Committee on
a periodic basis in the future to attract and retain employees,
to compensate non-employee directors, and in connection with
acquisitions. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had
approximately 1,000 employees worldwide, 12 officers and 7
non-employee directors of the Company, all of whom would have
been eligible to participate in the 2007 Incentive Plan.
Summary of the
Provisions of the 2007 Incentive Plan
The following is a summary of the principal features of the 2007
Incentive Plan. A copy of the 2007 Incentive Plan, as proposed,
is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
General
The Compensation Committee of the Board has been designated by
the Board as the committee to administer and make awards under
the 2007 Incentive Plan.
Pursuant to the 2007 Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee
may grant awards to any of our employees, officers and
non-employee directors, and to any of the employees, officers
and non-employee directors of our subsidiaries (collectively,
“Plan Participants”).
The 2007 Incentive Plan permits the Compensation Committee to
make the following types of awards:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
options to purchase the Company’s common stock, including
both incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422 of the IRC and non-qualified stock options;
|
| |
| |
•
|
restricted or unrestricted awards of the Company’s common
stock;
|
46
|
|
|
| |
•
|
performance-based awards; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
stock appreciation rights.
|
Plan
Administration; Grant Dates, Grant Prices
The 2007 Incentive Plan, like the 1999 Incentive Plan, is
administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors. The Compensation Committee selects the individuals to
whom options or other awards are granted and specifies the terms
of the awards, including among others as applicable, vesting
schedules, term, exercise price, and performance metrics. The
Compensation Committee has delegated authority under the 1999
Incentive Plan, and expects to delegate authority under the 2007
Incentive Plan, to the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive
Vice President, Human Resources to grant stock options to:
(i) employees who are not executive officers, limited to a
maximum of 45,000 options per grant to senior vice presidents,
15,000 per grant to vice presidents, and 10,000 per grant to
other employees, and (ii) new hires who will not be
executive officers, limited to a maximum of 45,000 options per
grant to senior vice presidents, 10,000 per grant to vice
presidents, and 5,000 per grant to other employees. The
Committee also has delegated authority under the 1999 Incentive
Plan, and expects to delegate authority under the 2007 Incentive
Plan, to the Chief Executive Officer, acting as a Board
Committee of one, to grant restricted stock to employees who are
not executive officers, but such authority has not been
exercised and the Committee currently intends to continue to
make such grants itself where practical.
The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy that all awards
under the 1999 Incentive Plan and, if adopted, the 2007
Incentive Plan, except in the case of grants in connection with
acquisitions, will be made on the 15th day of the second
month following the close of each fiscal quarter of the Company,
or if later, one week following the Company’s public
quarterly or year-end earnings release. The Committee adopted
the policy with the intention that awards will occur at a time
when current information regarding the Company is generally
available in the public marketplace.
The Compensation Committee has historically made awards under
the 1999 Incentive Plan only at fair market value on the date of
the award. The terms of the 2007 Incentive Plan preclude awards
at less than fair market value.
Incentive
Stock Options (ISOs)
These options may only be granted to our employees, and may not
be exercised more than 10 years after the date of grant.
The exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. Other terms of
the awards will be determined by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee has granted ISOs in the past, but
more recently has chosen to grant only non-qualified options.
Non-Qualified
Stock Options
These options may be granted to any Plan Participant. The
exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market value
of our common stock on the date of grant, and other terms of the
awards will be determined by the Compensation Committee.
Since January 2006, the Compensation Committee has granted
non-qualified options rather than ISOs under the 1999 Incentive
Plan, and currently intends to continue that practice under the
2007 Incentive Plan.
Stock
Awards
The Compensation Committee may grant shares of stock or rights
to receive shares of stock or their cash equivalent or both, to
any Plan Participant subject to such restrictions, conditions,
and contingencies
47
as are set by the Committee. Grants of restricted stock may vest
based upon time or performance metrics as determined by the
Committee at the time of issuance.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
These rights may be granted on a free standing or tandem basis
to any Plan Participant. The term of exercise will be determined
by the Compensation Committee. These rights generally entitle
the holder to receive a payment having an aggregate value equal
to the product of the excess of the fair market value over the
exercise price per share specified in the grant multiplied by
the number of shares specified in the award. Payment by the
Company of the amount receivable in respect of the stock
appreciation right may be paid in any combination of cash and
common stock.
The Compensation Committee historically has not made grants of
stock appreciation rights under the 1999 Incentive Plan and has
no current plans to do so under the 2007 Incentive Plan.
Shares Subject
to the 2007 Incentive Plan
The maximum number of shares issuable under the 2007 Incentive
Plan is 3,000,000 shares. Shares of stock (including rights
or options) granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan that are
forfeited back to the Company because of failure to meet an
award contingency are again available for delivery pursuant to
new awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan. If the exercise price
of any option granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan is satisfied
by tendering shares of stock to the Company, only the number of
shares of stock issued net of the shares of stock tendered are
deemed delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number
of shares available for delivery under the 2007 Incentive Plan.
Change in
Control/Adjustment/Corporate Transactions
The 2007 Incentive Plan generally provides that, except as may
be provided in individual award agreements, all outstanding
awards will become immediately vested and exercisable upon
(i) any change of control of a nature that would be
required to be reported in a proxy statement in response to
Item 6(e) (or comparable successor item) of
Schedule 14A of Regulation 14A promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act, (ii) the acquisition of more than
15% of the Company’s outstanding common stock by a single
person or entity or by a group of persons
and/or
entities acting in concert, or (iii) change of the majority
of the Board of Directors of the Company during any two year
period unless the election of each new director during the
period was approved by at least 75% of the directors still in
office who were directors at the beginning of the period. The
consummation of any merger or consolidation in which the owners
of 75% or more of the Company’s common stock immediately
prior to the merger or consolidation receive the same percentage
ownership in the surviving corporation will not be deemed a
change in control for vesting purposes.
The number of shares available under the 2007 Incentive Plan and
the number of shares of common stock subject to each outstanding
award and, if applicable, the exercise price thereof, shall be
adjusted upon the occurrence of, among other things, a stock
dividend, stock split and a recapitalization of our common stock.
In the event of a Corporate Transaction (defined below), the
surviving or purchasing entity may assume or continue stock
options or stock appreciation rights or portions thereof under
the 2007 Incentive Plan, or may substitute similar awards,
including among others awards to acquire the same consideration
paid to the stockholders pursuant to the Corporate Transaction.
In the event that stock options or stock appreciation rights are
not assumed, continued, or substituted by the surviving or
purchasing entity, such awards, to the extent not already vested
under change in control provisions, shall automatically vest
prior to the Corporate Transaction. Such vested stock options
and stock appreciation rights shall terminate if not exercised
at or prior to the effective time of the transaction; provided,
however, the Committee in its discretion may provide that the
holders of such awards may not exercise such awards but instead
will receive a payment equal to the excess of the value of the
property the holder would have received upon exercise of the
stock option or the stock appreciation right over any exercise
price payable by the holder.
48
“Corporate Transaction” includes (i) a sale or
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Company, (ii) a sale or other disposition of at least 80%
of the outstanding securities of the Company, (iii) the
consummation of a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction
following which the Company is not the surviving entity unless
the owners of at least 80% of the Company’s common stock
immediately prior to the transaction receive the same percentage
ownership in the surviving entity, or (iv) the consummation
of a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction following
which the Company is the surviving corporation but the shares of
stock of the Company by virtue of the transaction are converted
into other securities, property, or cash.
Termination or
Amendment
The Compensation Committee may stop granting awards under the
2007 Incentive Plan at any time, and may alter or amend the 2007
Incentive Plan or any outstanding awards for any purpose which
may at the time be permitted by law, or may at any time
terminate the 2007 Incentive Plan as to any further grants of
awards. No amendment, however, can increase the maximum number
of shares available under the 2007 Incentive Plan, change the
group of persons eligible to receive awards under the 2007
Incentive Plan, extend the time within which awards may be
granted, or otherwise materially amend the 2007 Incentive Plan,
including among others changes or adjustments in the exercise
price of awards, in each case without (i) stockholder
approval if such approval is required by law or the requirements
of Nasdaq, and (ii) the approval of each affected 2007
Incentive Plan participant if the amendment, alteration or
termination would adversely affect the participant’s rights
or obligations under any award made prior to the date of the
amendment, alteration or termination. Any termination of the
2007 Incentive Plan would not affect the validity of any award
outstanding on the date of termination.
The cost to the Company will differ, depending upon the type of
award granted, but without stockholder approval the overall cost
to the Company may not be increased beyond that which would be
recognized if all awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan were
stock awards which are the most costly variety under current
accounting and tax rules.
Consideration for
Awards
Any and all grants of awards and issuances of shares of common
stock under the 2007 Incentive Plan will be in consideration of
services performed by the participant for the Company or any of
its subsidiaries. The purchase price of common stock acquired
pursuant to an option shall be paid either in cash at the time
of exercise or by delivery to the Company of shares of the
Company’s common stock having a fair market value
(determined as of the exercise date) equal to the aggregate
purchase price, and the Committee may permit a participant to
pay the purchase price by authorizing a third party to sell
shares of stock acquired upon exercise of the option and remit a
sufficient portion of the sale proceeds to pay the exercise
price.
Market Value of
the Company’s Common Stock
The Company’s common stock that may be issued pursuant to
awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan is listed on the
NASDAQ stock exchange under the trading symbol “HPOL”.
The closing market value of the Company’s common stock on
September 4, 2007 was $4.33 per share.
Summary of
Federal Income Tax Consequences of Options Granted Under the
2007 Incentive Plan
The following summary is intended only as a general guide as to
the United States federal income tax consequences under current
law of options granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan and does
not attempt to describe all possible federal or other tax
consequences of such participation or tax consequences based on
particular circumstances.
49
ISOs
A Plan Participant recognizes no taxable income for regular
income tax purposes as the result of the grant or exercise of an
ISO qualifying under Section 422 of the IRC.
Plan Participants who do not dispose of their shares for two
years following the date of grant or within one year following
the exercise date will normally recognize a taxable long-term
capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between
the sale price and the purchase price of the shares. However, if
a Plan Participant disposes of shares within two years after the
date of grant or within one year from the exercise date,
referred to as a “disqualifying disposition”, the
difference between the fair market value of the shares on the
exercise date and the option exercise price will be taxed as
ordinary income at the time of disposition. Any gain in excess
of that amount will be a capital gain. If a loss is recognized,
there will be no ordinary income, and such loss will be a
capital loss. A capital gain or loss will be long-term if the
Plan Participant’s holding period is more than one year.
The difference between the option exercise price and the fair
market value of the shares on the exercise date of an ISO is an
adjustment in computing the Plan Participant’s alternative
minimum taxable income and may be subject to an alternative
minimum tax which is paid if the tax exceeds the regular tax for
the year. Special rules may apply with respect to certain
subsequent sales of the shares in a disqualifying disposition,
certain basis adjustments for purposes of computing the
alternative minimum taxable income on a subsequent sale of the
shares, and certain tax credits may arise with respect to Plan
Participants subject to the alternative minimum tax.
If a Plan Participant does not have a disqualifying disposition,
the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for federal
income tax purposes. If there is a disqualifying disposition,
the Company should be able to deduct any ordinary income
recognized by the Plan Participant upon the disposition for
federal income tax purposes, except to the extent the deduction
is limited by applicable provisions of the IRC or the
regulations thereunder.
Non-Qualified
Stock Options
Options not designated or qualifying as ISOs will be
non-qualified stock options and have no special tax status. A
Plan Participant generally recognizes no taxable income as the
result of the grant of such an option. Upon exercise of a
non-qualified stock option, the Plan Participant normally
recognizes taxable ordinary income in an amount equal to the
difference between the option exercise price and the fair market
value of the shares on the exercise date. If the Plan
Participant is an employee, the ordinary income generally is
subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the
sale of stock acquired by the exercise of a non-qualified stock
option, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the
sale price and the fair market value on the exercise date, will
be taxed as capital gain or loss. A capital gain or loss will be
long-term if the Plan Participant’s holding period is more
than one year. No tax deduction is available to the Company with
respect to the grant of a non-qualified option or the sale of
the stock acquired pursuant to that grant.
The Company generally should be entitled to a deduction equal to
the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Plan Participant
as a result of the exercise of a non-qualified option, except to
the extent the deduction is limited by applicable provisions of
the IRC or the regulations thereunder.
Receipt or
Allocation of New Plan Benefits
No specific allocation of the proposed shares available under
the 2007 Incentive Plan to any person or group has been made by
the Compensation Committee. The Committee will consider in the
future whether or not to make awards to any or all Plan
Participants with respect to the increased number of shares
under the 2007 Incentive Plan. The Committee currently expects
that the number of shares available under the 2007 Incentive
Plan, if approved, would be sufficient to cover awards for a two
to three year period, in part dependent upon acquisition
activity.
The benefits to be received by the Company’s executive
officers (including the NEOs), non-employee directors, and
employees with respect to the increased number of shares under
the 2007 Incentive Plan
50
are not determinable because, under the terms of the 2007
Incentive Plan, grants are in the discretion of the Compensation
Committee and the value of each grant will depend on the market
price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
An example of how the Compensation Committee has made equity
grants to NEOs in the past can be found in “Grants of
Plan-Based Awards” table in the “Compensation of
Directors and Officers” section of this Proxy Statement.
In the past, the Compensation Committee has provided
non-employee directors approximately half of the value of
retainer compensation plus compensation for Board leadership in
the form of options or restricted stock grants under the 1999
Incentive Plan. In fiscal 2007 this included a retainer of
$41,500 in value of restricted common stock, 5,000 shares
of restricted common stock for the Board Chair, the Lead
Director, and the Chairs of the Audit and Compensation
Committees, and 2,500 shares of restricted common stock for
the Chair of the Research and Development Committee. The
Compensation Committee currently intends to continue to make
awards in an equivalent amount to non-employee directors in
fiscal 2008, subject to stockholder approval of the 2007
Incentive Plan. In addition, the Compensation Committee is in
the process of retaining a compensation consultant to assist the
Committee in reviewing the structure of the Company’s
compensation for NEOs, including among others the appropriate
relationship between cash and equity compensation and other
incentives. One possible result of that review could be a
decision by the Committee to make additional equity awards to
executive officers.
APPROVAL OF THE
2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
APPROVAL
OF THE 2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN.
Vote
Required
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
of our Common Stock present or represented at the meeting is
required for the adoption of the 2007 Purchase Plan. Broker
non-votes with respect to this matter will be treated as neither
a vote “for” or a vote “against” the matter,
although they will be counted in determining if a quorum is
present. However, abstentions will be considered in determining
the number of votes required to attain a majority of the shares
present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote.
Accordingly, an abstention from voting by a stockholder present
in person or by proxy at the meeting has the same legal effect
as a vote “against” the matter because it represents a
share present or represented at the meeting and entitled to
vote, thereby increasing the number of affirmative votes
required to approve this proposal.
Summary of the
Proposal
The Company’s stockholders are being asked to approve the
Company’s 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2007
Purchase Plan”). By its terms, the Company’s currently
effective Employee Stock Purchase Plan terminates in 2009. The
proposed 2007 Purchase Plan is in substantially the form of the
Company’s existing Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
“1999 Purchase Plan”) and would provide the Company
with ability to issue 500,000 additional shares of common stock
beyond those remaining available for purchase under the 1999
Purchase Plan. The number of shares issuable under the 1999
Purchase Plan was last increased in 2004. As of June 30,
2007, 837,846 shares have been purchased under the 1999
Purchase Plan and 162,154 shares remain available for
purchase under the 1999 Purchase Plan.
Whether or not the 2007 Purchase Plan is approved by the
stockholders, the 1999 Purchase Plan will continue in effect in
its current form, subject to the existing limitations on the
maximum number of shares available under it and its expiration
in 2009.
The 2007 Purchase Plan is intended to ensure that the Company is
able to remain competitive and provide sufficient equity
incentives to attract and retain highly-qualified and
experienced employees. The
51
Board of Directors believes that approval of the 2007 Purchase
Plan is in the best interests of Harris Interactive and our
stockholders because the availability of an adequate reserve of
shares under an employee stock purchase plan is an important
factor in attracting, motivating and retaining qualified
officers and employees essential to our success and in aligning
their long-term interests with those of the stockholders.
Summary of the
Provisions of the 2007 Purchase Plan
The following is a summary of the principal features of the 2007
Purchase Plan. A copy of the proposed 2007 Purchase Plan is
included as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
General
Pursuant to the 2007 Purchase Plan, employees of the Company and
its subsidiaries may acquire stock ownership interests in the
Company. Employees use payroll deductions to acquire shares of
the Company’s common stock under the 2007 Purchase Plan.
The 2007 Purchase Plan is administered by our Board of Directors.
Eligibility
All individuals who are employees of the Company for tax
purposes and whose customary employment with the Company is at
least 20 hours per week and more than five months in any
calendar year are eligible to participate in the 2007 Purchase
Plan beginning on the first enrollment date under the 2007
Purchase Plan after satisfying the eligibility requirements.
However, an employee is not eligible to participate in the 2007
Purchase Plan if (i) immediately after a purchase under the
plan, the employee would own stock possessing 5% or more of the
total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of
the Company or of any subsidiary of the Company (or ownership of
such stock would be attributed to the employee), including for
purposes of this calculation any stock that the employee may be
entitled to purchase under all outstanding options, or
(ii) the employee’s rights to purchase stock under all
employee stock purchase plans of the Company and any of its
subsidiaries accrues at a rate of more than $25,000 worth of
stock for each calendar year in which such right is outstanding
at any time. As of July 1, 2007, the most recent enrollment
date under the 2007 Purchase Plan, approximately 700 of the
Company’s employees were eligible to participate in the
2007 Purchase Plan.
Participation
in the 2007 Purchase Plan
Eligible employees may participate in the 2007 Purchase Plan by
filing a subscription agreement and payroll deduction
authorization with the Company. A participant may withdraw from
the 2007 Purchase Plan at any time including during offering
periods.
Option Grants
and Purchase of Shares
A participant may elect to make purchases through payroll
deductions of up to 10% of his or her base compensation. Base
compensation for purposes of the 2007 Purchase Plan generally
includes all base straight time gross earnings and commissions,
but excludes payments for overtime, shift premium, incentive
compensation, incentive payments, bonuses and other
compensation. All payroll deductions must be in increments of 1%
of base compensation.
On the first day of each six-month offering period under the
2007 Purchase Plan (the “grant date”), participants
are granted an option to purchase at the applicable purchase
price up to the number of shares of the Company’s common
stock that is equal to (i) the participant’s payroll
deductions accumulated prior to the exercise date divided by
(ii) the applicable purchase price. The option will be
exercised automatically on the last day of the offering period,
June 30 and December 31 of each year (the “exercise
date”). A participant may not purchase more than
5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock during any
particular offering period. No fractional shares will be issued;
any payroll deductions not sufficient to purchase a full share
will be retained in the participant’s account for the next
offering period unless the
52
participant terminates participation in the 2007 Purchase Plan
prior to such period. Any other monies left in a
participant’s account after the applicable exercise date
will be returned to the participant.
Purchase
Price
The purchase price per share at which shares are purchased under
the 2007 Purchase Plan is an amount equal to 85% of the fair
market value of a share of common stock on the applicable grant
date or exercise date, whichever is lower.
Termination of
Employment
An employee’s participation in the 2007 Purchase Plan will
be terminated when the employee (i) ceases to be employed
by the Company or its subsidiaries for any reason, or
(ii) otherwise ceases to meet the eligibility requirements.
Upon a termination of an employee’s participation in the
plan, the payroll deductions credited to his or her account
during the offering period but not yet used to exercise his or
her option to purchase shares will be returned to the
participant or, in the case of his or her death, to the person
or persons entitled thereto.
Transferability
Neither payroll deductions credited to a participant’s
account nor any rights relating to the exercise of an option or
to receive shares under the 2007 Purchase Plan may be
transferred in any way (other than by will or by the laws of
descent and distribution to the extent provided by the 2007
Purchase Plan). During a participant’s lifetime, an option
to purchase shares under the 2007 Purchase Plan is exercisable
only by him or her.
Administration
The Board of Directors administers the 2007 Purchase Plan. The
Board of Directors has discretionary authority to interpret the
plan, determine eligibility and adjudicate disputes under the
2007 Purchase Plan.
Change in
Control/Adjustment
The 2007 Purchase Plan generally provides that, subject to any
necessary stockholder approval, the maximum number of shares a
participant may be entitled to purchase during a particular
offering period, as well as the purchase price and number of
shares covered by a particular option, will be adjusted to
reflect any increase or decrease in the number of issued and
outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock resulting
from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, or
similar event. The 2007 Purchase Plan further generally provides
that in the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of
the Company, the offering period will terminate immediately
prior to the consummation of such proposed action unless
otherwise provided by the Board, and each participant will have
the right to exercise in full his or her option to purchase
shares to the extent of his or her accrued payroll deductions to
date. In the event of a merger or proposed sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Company, outstanding
options will be assumed or substituted by the successor company,
but if the successor company refuses to do so, each participant
will have the right to exercise in full his or her option to
purchase shares to the extent of his or her accrued payroll
deductions to date.
Duration,
Amendment and Termination
The Board of Directors may terminate or amend the 2007 Purchase
Plan at any time. No such termination may affect options
previous granted, except that the Board may terminate an
offering period on any exercise date if the Board determines
that termination of the 2007 Purchase Plan is in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board may
make certain changes to the 2007 Purchase Plan without
stockholder approval, including among others limiting the
frequency or number of payroll deduction rate changes that may
be made by participants during an offering period, establishing
the exchange ratio applicable to amounts withheld in a currency
other than U.S. dollars, and establishing such
53
other limitations or procedures as the Board deems advisable in
its sole discretion and which are consistent with the terms of
the 2007 Purchase Plan. The Board will seek stockholder approval
of amendments to the 2007 Purchase Plan to the extent required
by applicable law or stock exchange rule.
Summary of
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the 2007 Purchase
Plan
The following summary is intended only as a general guide as to
the United States federal income tax consequences under current
law of participation in the 2007 Purchase Plan and does not
attempt to describe all possible federal or other tax
consequences of such participation or tax consequences based on
particular circumstances.
The 2007 Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an
“employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of
Section 423 of the IRC. A participant will not have income
upon enrolling in the 2007 Purchase Plan or upon purchasing
stock at the end of an offering period.
A participant may have both compensation income and a capital
gain or loss upon the sale of stock that was acquired under the
2007 Purchase Plan. The amount of each type of income and loss
will depend on when the participant sells the stock.
If the participant sells the stock at a profit (the sales
proceeds exceed the option purchase price) more than two years
after the commencement of the offering during which the stock
was purchased and more than one year after the date on which the
participant purchased the stock, then the participant will have
compensation income equal to the lesser of: (i) the excess
of the fair market value of the stock on the grant date over the
option purchase price; and (ii) the participant’s
profit. Any excess profit will be long-term capital gain. If the
participant sells the stock at a loss (the sales proceeds are
less than the option purchase price) after satisfying these
waiting periods, then the loss will be a long-term capital loss.
If the participant sells the stock prior to satisfying these
waiting periods, then he or she will have engaged in a
disqualifying disposition. Upon a disqualifying disposition, the
participant will have compensation income equal to the fair
market value of the stock on the day he or she purchased the
stock less the option purchase price. The participant also will
have a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the
sales proceeds and the value of the stock on the day he or she
purchased the stock. This capital gain or loss will be long-term
if the participant has held the stock for more than one year and
otherwise will be short term.
There will be no tax consequences to Harris Interactive except
that it will be entitled to a deduction when a participant has
compensation income upon a disqualifying disposition. Any such
deduction will be subject to Section 162(m) of the IRC.
2007 Purchase
Plan Benefits
The benefits to be received by the Company’s executive
officers and employees under the 2007 Purchase Plan are not
determinable because, under the terms of the 2007 Purchase Plan,
the amounts of future stock purchases are based on elections
made by participants. Future purchase prices are not
determinable because they are based on the fair market value of
the Company’s common stock. No purchase rights have been
granted, and no shares have been issued, under the 2007 Purchase
Plan. For additional information as to shares purchased under
the 1999 Purchase Plan during fiscal 2007, see Note 13 to
the financial statements filed with the SEC in the
Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
54
RATIFICATION OF
THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL
OF
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PWC TO SERVE AS
THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR
FISCAL 2008.
Required
Vote
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
of our common stock present or represented at the meeting is
required for the ratification of the appointment of PwC as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2008. Broker non-votes with respect to this matter will
be treated as neither a vote “for” or a vote
“against” the matter, although they will be counted in
determining if a quorum is present. However, abstentions will be
considered in determining the number of votes required to attain
a majority of the shares present or represented at the meeting
and entitled to vote. Accordingly, an abstention from voting by
a stockholder present in person or by proxy at the meeting has
the same legal effect as a vote “against” the matter
because it represents a share present or represented at the
meeting and entitled to vote, thereby increasing the number of
affirmative votes required to approve this proposal.
Summary of the
Proposal
The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(“PwC”) to serve as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2008.
If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of PwC, the
Audit Committee will consider a change in auditors for the next
year. Even if the selection of PwC is approved, the Audit
Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of new
independent auditors at any time during the year if it believes
that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company
and its stockholders.
Representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting to
answer appropriate questions. They will also have the
opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
Fees Paid to
PwC
The aggregate fees billed by PwC for professional services
rendered to the Company for the fiscal years ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 were $633,025 and $631,255, respectively. An
explanation of such fees is provided in the following table:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
2007($)(1)
|
|
|
2006($)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
628,325
|
|
|
|
590,000
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
41,500
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total Fees Paid
|
|
|
633,025
|
|
|
|
631,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts shown above are consistent with the engagement fees
mutually agreed upon by the Audit Committee and PwC in
connection with PwC’s audit of the Company’s fiscal
year ended June 30, 2007. Additional amounts related to
PwC’s audit of the Company’s fiscal year ended
June 30, 2007 may be proposed to the Audit Committee
by PwC. However, such amounts, if any, are unknown as of the
date of the filing of this Proxy Statement. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
After the filing of the 2006 Proxy Statement, the Company and
PwC mutually agreed to additional billed amounts related to
PwC’s audit of the Company’s fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006. |
55
“Audit Fees” include fees billed by PwC for
(i) the audit of Harris Interactive’s annual financial
statements for the fiscal year, (ii) reviewing our
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
and (iii) auditing and preparing its attestation report
with respect to the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. “Audit-Related Fees” include fees
for services such as accounting consultations. “Tax
Fees” are fees billed for tax services in connection with
the preparation of the Company’s federal, state and foreign
income tax returns, including extensions and quarterly estimated
tax payments, and customary consultation or advice regarding
accounting issues, potential transactions or taxes (e.g., tax
compliance, tax consulting, or tax planning). “All Other
Fees” are fees billed for services not included as Audit
Fees, Audit-Related Fees, and Tax Fees.
The Audit Committee approves the annual budget for all audit and
non-audit services and pre-approves all engagements of the
Company’s auditors to provide non-audit services. The Audit
Committee has delegated authority to members of the Committee to
pre-approve non-audit services and any such approvals must be
reported at the next meeting of the Audit Committee. No member
of the Audit Committee exercised such delegated authority during
fiscal 2007. The Audit Committee’s general policy is to
restrict the engagement of the independent registered public
accounting firm to providing audit and audit-related services.
The Audit Committee will not engage the independent registered
public accounting firm to provide any non-audit services that
are prohibited under Section 10A of the Securities Exchange
Act and
Rule 10A-3
thereunder. No fees were approved by the Audit Committee under
the exception provided in Section 10(A)(i)(1)(B) of the
Securities Exchange Act during fiscal 2007 or fiscal 2006.
The Audit Committee considered and determined that the provision
of the services other than the services described under
“Audit Fees” is compatible with maintaining the
independence of PwC as the Company’s independent registered
public accounting firm.
At the date of this Proxy Statement, the only business that the
Board of Directors intends to present or knows that others will
present at the Annual Meeting is as set forth above. If any
other matter or matters are properly brought before the Annual
Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, it is intended that shares
represented by proxies will be voted or not voted by the persons
named in the proxies in accordance with the recommendation of
the Board of Directors, or, in the absence of any such
recommendation, by the proxy holders in their discretion.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
A copy of Harris Interactive’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (without exhibits)
is being distributed with this Proxy Statement. The Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
is also available, without charge, by writing or telephoning to
Corporate Secretary, 60 Corporate Woods, Rochester, New York
14623; telephone
(585) 272-8400.
In addition, the report (with exhibits) is available at the
SEC’s Internet site (www.sec.gov), and in the Investor
Relations section of our website (www.harrisinteractive.com). If
requested, the Company also will provide such persons with
copies of any exhibit to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
upon the payment of a fee limited to the Company’s
reasonable expenses of furnishing such exhibits.
FUTURE
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Advance Notice
Procedures
Under the Company’s Bylaws, no business may be brought
before an annual meeting unless:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
it is specified in the notice of the meeting (which includes
stockholder proposals that Harris Interactive is required to
include in its proxy statement pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Securities Exchange Act); or
|
56
|
|
|
| |
•
|
it is otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the
direction of Harris Interactive’s Board of Directors or by
a stockholder entitled to vote who delivered notice to Harris
Interactive, containing certain information specified in the
Bylaws, not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to
the first anniversary of the date of the Company’s
prior-year proxy statement (between June 1, 2007 and
July 1, 2007 for proposals for the 2007 annual meeting, and
between May 16, 2008 and June 15, 2008 for proposals
for the 2008 annual meeting.)
|
These requirements are separate from and in addition to the
SEC’s requirements that a stockholder must meet in order to
have a stockholder proposal included in Harris
Interactive’s proxy statement, described below.
Additionally, the Company’s Bylaws require stockholders
desiring to nominate persons for election to the Board of
Directors to deliver notice to the Corporate Secretary,
containing certain information specified by the Bylaws, not less
than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary of the date of the Company’s prior year proxy
statement (between June 1, 2007 and July 1, 2007 for
the 2007 annual meeting, and between May 16, 2008 and
June 15, 2008 for the 2008 annual meeting.)
Stockholder
Proposals for the 2008 Annual Meeting
In addition to the advance notice procedures described above,
stockholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion
in the proxy materials for Harris Interactive’s annual
meeting of stockholders in 2008 may do so by following the
procedures prescribed in SEC
Rule 14a-8.
To be eligible for inclusion, stockholder proposals must be
received by Harris Interactive’s Corporate Secretary by
May 16, 2008 (which date is 120 days prior to the
first anniversary of the date of this Proxy Statement).
Additionally, if a stockholder interested in submitting a
proposal for the 2008 annual meeting fails to deliver notice of
such stockholder’s intent to make such proposal to the
Corporate Secretary between May 16, 2008 and June 15,
2008, then any proxy solicited by management may confer
discretionary authority to vote on such proposal.
57
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Section 1 General
1.1 Purpose. This Harris
Interactive Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
has been established by Harris Interactive Inc. (the
“Company”) (a) to attract and retain persons
eligible to participate in the Plan; (b) motivate
Participants, by means of appropriate incentives, to achieve
long-range goals; (c) provide incentive compensation
opportunities that are competitive with those of other similar
companies; and (d) further identify Participant’s
interests with those of the Company’s other stockholders
through compensation that is based on the Company’s common
stock; and thereby promote the long-term financial interest of
the Company and the Related Companies, including the growth in
value of the Company’s equity and enhancement of long-term
stockholder return.
1.2 Participation. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall determine
and designate, from time to time, from among the Eligible
Individuals, those persons who will be granted one or more
Awards under the Plan, and thereby become
“Participants” in the Plan. In the discretion of the
Committee, a Participant may be granted any Award permitted
under the provisions of the Plan, and more than one Award may be
granted to a Participant. Subject to Section 6.2, Awards may be
granted as alternatives to or replacements of awards outstanding
under the Plan, or any other plan or arrangement of the Company
or a Related Company (including a plan or arrangement of a
business or entity, all or a portion of which is acquired by the
Company or a Related Company).
1.3 Operation, Administration and
Definitions. The operation and administration
of the Plan, including the Awards made under the Plan, shall be
subject to the provisions of Section 4 (relating to
Operation and Administration). Capitalized terms in the Plan
shall be defined as set forth in the Plan (including the
definition provisions of Section 1.4 of the Plan).
1.4 Defined Terms. For purposes of
the Plan, the terms listed below shall be defined as follows:
(a) Award. The term “Award”
shall mean any award or benefit granted to any Participant under
the Plan, including, without limitation, the grant of Options,
SARS, Stock Awards and Cash Awards.
(b) Board. The term “Board”
shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
(c) Change in Control. The term
“Change in Control” means a change in control
occurring after the Effective Date of this Plan of a nature that
would be required to be reported in a proxy statement with
respect to the Company (even if the Company is not actually
subject to said reporting requirements) in response to
Item 6(e) (or any comparable or successor Item) of
Schedule 14A of Regulation 14A promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), except that any merger, consolidation or corporate
reorganization in which the owners of the Company’s capital
stock entitled to vote in the election of directors (the
“Voting Stock”) prior to said combination receive 75%
or more of the resulting entity’s Voting Stock shall not be
considered a change in control for the purposes of this Plan;
and provided that, without limitation of the foregoing, such
change in control shall be deemed to have occurred if
(i) any “person” (as that term is used in
Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act, excluding
any stock purchase or employee stock ownership plan maintained
by the Company or a Related Company) becomes the
“beneficial owner” (as that term is defined by the
Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly,
of more than 15% of the outstanding Voting Stock of the Company
or its successors; or (ii) during any period of two
consecutive years a majority of the Board of Directors no longer
consists of individuals who were members of the Board of
Directors at the beginning of such period, unless the election
of each director who was not a director at the beginning of the
period was approved by a vote of at least 75% of the directors
still in office who were directors at the beginning of the
period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that
Section 409A would otherwise be applicable to any
particular Award, with respect to that Award a Change in Control
shall
A-1
be deemed to occur only if there is a change in ownership of the
Company as described in IRC
Regulation 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v),
a change in effective control of the Company as described in IRC
Regulation 1.409A-2(i)(5)(vi),
or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the
assets of the Company as described in IRC
Regulation 1.409A-2(i)(5)(vii).
(d) Code. The term “Code” means
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A reference to
any provision of the Code shall include reference to any
successor provision of the Code.
(e) The term “Committee” is as defined in
Section 5.
(f) The term “Eligible Individual” shall mean any
employee, officer or non-employee director of the Company or a
Related Company.
(g) Fair Market Value. For purposes of
determining the “Fair Market Value” of a share of
Stock, the following rules shall apply:
(i) If the Stock is listed on any established stock
exchange or national market system, including without limitation
the Nasdaq stock exchange, then its “Fair Market
Value” shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or
the closing bid if no sales were reported) as quoted on such
exchange or system for the last market trading day on the date
of determination.
(ii) If the Stock is not at the time listed or admitted to
trading on a stock exchange, the “Fair Market Value”
shall be the mean between the lowest reported bid price and
highest reported asked price of the Stock on the date in
question in the over-the-counter market, as such prices are
reported in a publication of general circulation selected by the
Committee and regularly reporting the market price of Stock in
such market.
(iii) If the Stock is not listed or admitted to trading on
any stock exchange or traded in the over-the-counter market, the
“Fair Market Value” shall be as determined in good
faith by the Committee.
(h) Related Companies. The term
“Related Company” means (i) any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other entity during any period in
which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the
voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (or
successor to the Company) entitled to vote; and (ii) any
corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity during
any period in which at least 50% voting or profits interest is
owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company, by any entity
that is a successor to the Company, or by any entity that is a
Related Company by reason of clause (i) next above.
(i) Stock. The term “Stock”
shall mean shares of common stock of the Company.
Section 2 Options
and SARs
2.1 Descriptions.
(a) The grant of an “Option” entitles the
Participant to purchase shares of Stock at an Exercise Price
established by the Committee. Options granted under this
Section 2 may be either Incentive Stock Options or
Non-Qualified Stock Options, as determined in the discretion of
the Committee. An “Incentive Stock Option” is an
Option that is intended to satisfy the requirements applicable
to an “incentive stock option” described in
Section 422(b) of the Code. A “Non-Qualified
Option” is an Option that is not intended to be an
“incentive stock option” as that term is described in
Section 422(b) of the Code.
(b) A stock appreciation right (a “SAR”) entitles
the Participant to receive, in cash or Stock (as determined in
accordance with subsection 2.5), value equal to all or a portion
of the excess of: (a) the Fair Market Value of a specified
number of shares of Stock at the time of exercise; over
(b) an Exercise Price established by the Committee pursuant
to Section 2.2 of the Plan.
2.2 Exercise Price. The
“Exercise Price” of each Option and SAR granted under
this Section 2 shall be established by the Committee or
shall be determined by a method established by the Committee at
the time the Option or SAR is granted; provided, however, that
the Exercise Price for Options and SARS shall
A-2
be not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of
Stock as of the Pricing Date, and in the case of Incentive Stock
Options shall not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of
a share of Stock as of the Pricing Date in the case of
Participants owning 10% of the voting stock of the Company. For
purposes of the preceding sentence, the “Pricing Date”
shall be the date on which the Option or SAR is granted.
2.3 Exercise. An Option and SAR
shall be exercisable in accordance with such terms and
conditions and during such periods as may be established by the
Committee.
2.4 Payment of Option Exercise
Price. The payment of the Exercise Price of
an Option granted under this Section 2 shall be subject to
the following:
(a) Subject to the following provisions of this subsection
2.4, the full Exercise Price for shares of Stock purchased upon
the exercise of any Option shall be paid at the time of such
exercise (except that, in the case of an exercise arrangement
approved by the Committee and described in subsection 2.4(c),
payment may be made as soon as practicable after the exercise).
(b) The Exercise Price shall be payable in cash or, at the
option of the Committee, by tendering shares of Stock (by either
actual delivery of shares or by attestation, with such shares
valued at Fair Market Value as of the day of exercise), or in
any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee.
(c) The Committee may permit a Participant to elect to pay
the Exercise Price upon the exercise of an Option by authorizing
a third party to sell shares of Stock (or a sufficient portion
of the shares) acquired upon exercise of the Option and remit to
the Company a sufficient portion of the sale proceeds to pay the
entire Exercise Price and any tax withholding resulting from
such exercise.
2.5 Settlement of
Award. Distribution following exercise of an
Option or SAR, and shares of Stock distributed pursuant to such
exercise, shall be subject to such conditions, restrictions and
contingencies as the Committee may establish. Settlement of SARs
may be made in shares of Stock (valued at their Fair Market
Value at the time of exercise), in cash, or in a combination
thereof, as determined in the discretion of the Committee. The
Committee, in its discretion, may impose such conditions,
restrictions and contingencies with respect to shares of Stock
acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option or SAR as the
Committee determines to be desirable.
Section 3 Other
Awards
3.1 Stock Award. A Stock Award is
a grant of shares of Stock or of a right to receive shares of
Stock (or their cash equivalent or a combination of both) in the
future. Each Stock Award shall be subject to such conditions,
restrictions and contingencies as the Committee shall determine.
These may include continuous service
and/or the
achievement of performance goals. The performance goals that may
be used by the Committee for such Awards shall consist of those
metrics established by the Committee in its discretion, such as
cash generation targets, profit, revenue and market share
targets, profitability targets as measured by return ratios, and
stockholder returns. The Committee may designate a single goal
criterion or multiple goal criteria for performance measurement
purposes, including among others measurement based on absolute
Company, business unit, or individual performance
and/or on
performance as compared with that of other publicly-traded
companies.
3.2 Cash Award. A Cash Award is a
right denominated in cash or cash units to receive a payment,
which may be in the form of cash, shares of Stock or a
combination, based on the attainment of pre-established
performance goals and such other conditions, restrictions and
contingencies as the Committee shall determine. The performance
goals that may be used by the Committee for such awards shall
consist of those metrics established by the Committee in its
discretion such as cash generation targets, profits, revenue and
market share targets, profitability targets as measured by
return ratio, stockholder returns and such other goals as may be
designated by the Committee. The Committee may designate a
single goal criterion or multiple goal criteria for performance
measurement purposes with the measurement based on absolute
Company or business unit performance
and/or on
performance as compared with that of other publicly-traded
companies.
A-3
Section 4 Operation
and Administration
4.1 Effective Date. Subject to the
approval of the stockholders of the Company, the Plan shall be
effective as of October 30, 2007 (the “Effective
Date”). The Plan shall be unlimited in duration and, in the
event of Plan termination, shall remain in effect as long as any
Awards under it are outstanding; provided, however, that, to the
extent required by the Code, no Incentive Stock Options may be
granted under the Plan on a date that is more than ten years
from the date the Plan is adopted or, if earlier, the date the
Plan is approved by stockholders.
4.2 Shares Subject to Plan.
(a) (i) Subject to the following provisions of this
subsection 4.2, the maximum number shares of Stock that may be
delivered to Participants and their beneficiaries under the Plan
shall be 3,000,000.
(ii) Any shares of Stock (including rights or options)
granted under the Plan that are forfeited back to the Company
because of the failure to meet an Award contingency or condition
shall again be available for delivery pursuant to new Awards
granted under the Plan. To the extent any shares of Stock
covered by an Award are not delivered to a Participant or
beneficiary because the Award is forfeited or canceled, or the
shares of Stock are not delivered because the Award is settled
in cash, such shares shall not be deemed to have been delivered
for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares of
Stock available for delivery under the Plan.
(iii) If the Exercise Price of any Option granted under the
Plan or any Prior Plan is satisfied by tendering shares of Stock
to the Company (by either actual delivery or by attestation),
only the number of shares of Stock issued net of the shares of
Stock tendered shall be deemed delivered for purposes of
determining the maximum number of shares of Stock available for
delivery under the Plan.
(iv) Shares of Stock delivered under the Plan in
settlement, assumption or substitution of outstanding awards (or
obligations to grant future awards) under the plans or
arrangements of another entity shall not reduce the maximum
number of shares of Stock available for delivery under the Plan,
to the extent that such settlement, assumption or substitution
is as a result of the Company or a Related Company acquiring
another entity (or an interest in another entity).
(b) Subject to subsection 4.2(c), the maximum number of
shares of Stock that may be issued by Options intended to be
Incentive Stock Options shall be 3,000,000 shares.
(c) Subject to Section 4.14 and 4.15 below, in the
event of a change in the capitalization of the Company
(including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split,
extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization,
merger, consolidation,
split-up,
spin-off, combination or exchange of shares), the Committee
(a) will make any appropriate adjustments to the maximum
number of shares of Stock that may be delivered to Participants
and their beneficiaries under this subsection 4.2(a) and (b),
and (b) will adjust Awards to preserve the benefits or
potential benefits of the Awards. Action by the Committee may
include adjustment of: (i) the number and kind of shares
which may be delivered under the Plan; (ii) the number and
kind of shares subject to outstanding Awards; and (iii) the
Exercise Price of outstanding Options and SARS; as well as any
other adjustments that the Committee determines to be equitable.
4.3 Limit on Distribution; Noncertificated Basis;
Section 409A. Distribution of shares of
Stock or other amounts under the Plan shall be subject to the
following:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the
Company shall have no liability to deliver any shares of Stock
under the Plan or make any other distribution of benefits under
the Plan unless such delivery or distribution would comply with
all applicable laws (including, without limitation, the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933), and the applicable
requirements of any securities exchange or similar entity.
(b) To the extent that the Plan provides for issuance of
stock certificates to reflect the issuance of shares of Stock,
the issuance may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the
extent not prohibited
A-4
by applicable law or the applicable rules of any stock exchange
or a national market system, including without limitation the
Nasdaq exchange.
(c) To the extent that the Committee determines that any
Award granted under the Plan is subject to Section 409A of
the Code, the agreement evidencing such Award shall incorporate
the terms and conditions required by Section 409A of the
Code. To the extent applicable, the Plan and the agreements
evidencing Awards shall be interpreted in accordance with
Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of
this Plan to the contrary, in the event that the Committee
determines that any Award may be subject to Section 409A of
the Code, the Committee may adopt such amendments to the Plan
and the applicable Award agreement or adopt other policies and
procedures (including policies and procedures with retroactive
effect), or take any other actions, that the Board determines
are necessary or appropriate to (i) exempt the Award
form Section 409A of the Code
and/or
preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided
with respect to the Award, or (ii) comply with
Section 409A of the Code.
4.4 Tax Withholding. Whenever the
Company proposes or is required to distribute Stock under the
Plan, the Company may require the recipient to remit to the
Company an amount sufficient to satisfy any Federal, state and
local tax withholding requirements prior to the delivery of any
certificate for such shares or, in the discretion of the
Committee, the Company may withhold from the shares to be
delivered shares sufficient to satisfy all or a portion of such
tax withholding requirements. Whenever under the Plan payments
are to be made in cash, such payments may be net of an amount
sufficient to satisfy any Federal, state and local tax
withholding requirements.
4.5 Dividends and Dividend
Equivalents. An Award may provide the
Participant with the right to receive dividends or dividend
equivalent payments with respect to Stock which may be either
paid currently or credited to an account for the Participant,
and may be settled in cash or Stock as determined by the
Committee. Any such settlements, and any such crediting of
dividends or dividend equivalents or reinvestment in shares of
Stock, may be subject to such conditions, restrictions and
contingencies as the Committee shall establish, including the
reinvestment of such credited amounts in Stock equivalents.
4.6 Payments. Awards may be
settled through cash payments, the delivery of shares of Stock,
the granting of replacement Awards, or combination thereof as
the Committee shall determine. Any Award settlement, including
payment deferrals, may be subject to such conditions,
restrictions and contingencies as the Committee shall determine,
subject, however, to Section 4.3(c). The Committee may
permit or require the deferral of any Award payment, subject to
such rules and procedures as it may establish and
Section 4.3(c), which may include provisions for the
payment or crediting of interest, or dividend equivalents,
including converting such credits into deferred Stock
equivalents.
4.7 Transferability. Except as
otherwise provided by the Committee, Awards under the Plan are
not transferable except as designated by the Participant by will
or by the laws of descent and distribution.
4.8 Form and Time of
Elections. Unless otherwise specified herein,
each election required or permitted to be made by any
Participant or other person entitled to benefits under the Plan,
and any permitted modification, or revocation thereof, shall be
in writing filed with the Committee at such times, in such form,
and subject to such restrictions and limitations, not
inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Committee shall
require.
4.9 Agreement With Company. At the
time of an Award to a Participant under the Plan, the Committee
may require a Participant to enter into an agreement with the
Company (the “Agreement”) in a form specified by the
Committee, agreeing to the terms and conditions of the Plan and
to such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with
the Plan, as the Committee may, in its sole discretion,
prescribe.
4.10 Limitation of Implied Rights.
(a) Neither a Participant nor any other person shall, by
reason of the Plan, acquire any right in or title to any assets,
funds or property of the Company or any Related Company
whatsoever, including, without
A-5
limitation, any specific funds, assets, or other property which
the Company or any Related Company, in their sole discretion,
may set aside in anticipation of a liability under the Plan. A
Participant shall have only a contractual right to the stock or
amounts, if any, payable under the Plan, unsecured by any assets
of the Company or any Related Company. Nothing contained in the
Plan shall constitute a guarantee that the assets of such
companies shall be sufficient to pay any benefits to any person.
(b) The Plan does not constitute a contract of employment,
and selection as a Participant will not give any Eligible
Individual the right to be retained in the employ of the Company
or any Related Company, nor any right or claim to any benefit
under the Plan, unless such right or claim has specifically
accrued under the terms of the Plan. Except as otherwise
provided in the Plan, no Award under the Plan shall confer upon
the holder thereof any right as a stockholder of the Company
prior to the date on which the individual fulfills all
conditions for receipt of such rights.
(c) The Company shall have no duty or obligation to any
holder of any Option to advise such holder as to the time or
manner of exercising such Option. Furthermore, the Company shall
have no duty or obligation to warn or otherwise advise such
holder of a pending termination or expiration of an Option or a
possible period in which the Option may not be exercised. The
Company has no duty or obligation to minimize the tax
consequences of an Option to the holder of such Option.
4.11 No Fractional Shares. No
fractional shares of Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant
to the Plan or any Award, and the Committee shall determine
whether cash shall be paid or transferred in lieu of any
fractional shares of Stock, or whether such fractional shares of
Stock or any rights thereto shall be canceled.
4.12 Evidence. Evidence required
of anyone under the Plan may be by certificate, affidavit,
document or other information which the person acting on it
considers pertinent and reliable, and signed, made or presented
by the proper party or parties.
4.13 Exceeding Limitations. To the
extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of Stock (determined
at the time the Option is granted) with respect to which
Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a
Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the
Company and all Related Companies) exceeds $100,000, such
Options shall be treated as Non-Qualified Stock Options to the
extent required by Section 422 of the Code.
4.14 Change in Control. Subject to
the provisions of subsection 4.2 (relating to the adjustment of
shares), and except as otherwise provided in the Plan or the
agreement reflecting the applicable Award, upon the occurrence
of a Change in Control:
(a) All outstanding Options (regardless of whether in
tandem with SARS) shall become fully exercisable.
(b) All outstanding SARs (regardless of whether in tandem
with Options) shall become fully exercisable.
(c) All forfeiture terms (including without limitation any
related to performance) under outstanding Stock Awards shall
lapse and all such Stock Awards shall become fully vested.
4.15 Corporate Transactions.
(a) For purposes of this Section 4.17, a
“Corporate Transaction” shall mean the occurrence, in
a single transaction or in a series of related transactions, of
any one or more of the following events:
(i) sale or other disposition of all of substantially all,
as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, of the
consolidated assets of the Company and Related Companies,
(ii) a sale or other disposition of at least eighty percent
(80%) of the outstanding Stock of the Company,
A-6
(iii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or
similar transaction following which the Company is not the
surviving entity unless the owners of at least 80% of the
Company’s Stock immediately prior to the transaction
receive the same percentage ownership in the surviving
entity; or
(iv) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or
similar transaction following which the Company is the surviving
corporation but the shares of Stock outstanding immediately
preceding the merger, consolidation, or similar transaction are
converted or exchanged by virtue of the merger, consolidation,
or similar transaction into other property, whether in the form
of securities, cash, or otherwise.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in an Award agreement, in
the event of a Corporate Transaction, any surviving or acquiring
entity, or its respective parent company, may assume or continue
any or all Options or SARS outstanding under the Plan, or may
substitute similar stock awards for Options or SARs outstanding
under the Plan (including but not limited to, awards to acquire
the same consideration paid to the stockholders of the Company
pursuant to the Corporate Transaction). A surviving or acquiring
entity or its parent may choose to assume or continue only a
portion of an Option or SAR or substitute a similar stock award
for only a portion of any Option or SAR. The terms of any
assumption, continuation or substitution shall be set by the
Committee in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.
(c) Except as otherwise stated in the Award agreement, in
the event of a Corporate Transaction in which the surviving or
acquiring entity or its respective parent company does not
assume or continue such outstanding Options or SARs or
substitute similar stock awards for such outstanding Options of
SARs, then with respect to Options or SARs that have not been
assumed, continued, or substituted and that remain outstanding,
the vesting of such Options and SARs, and if applicable the time
at which such Options and SARs may be exercised, shall
(contingent upon the effectiveness of the Corporate Transaction)
be accelerated in full to a date prior to the effective time of
such Corporate Transaction as the Committee shall determine, or
if the Committee shall not determine such a date, to the date
that is five (5) days prior to the effective date of the
Corporate Transaction, and such Options and SARs shall terminate
if not exercised (if applicable) at or prior to the effective
time of the Corporate Transaction.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event an Option
or SAR will terminate if not exercised prior to the effective
time of a Corporate Transaction, the Committee may provide, in
its sole discretion, that the holder of such Option or SAR may
not exercise such Option or SAR but will receive a payment, in
such form as may be determined by the Committee, equal in value
to the excess, if any, of (A) the value of the property the
holder of the Option or SAR would have received upon the
exercise of the Option or SAR, over (B) any exercise price
payable by such holder in connection with such exercise.
(e) The accelerated vesting provisions of this
Section 4.15 are intended to be in addition to, and not in
substitution for, the provisions of Section 4.14.
4.16. Action by Company or Related
Company. Any action required or permitted to
be taken by the Company or any Related Company shall be by
resolution of its board of directors, or by action of one or
more members of the board (including a committee of the board)
who are duly authorized to act for the board, or (except to the
extent prohibited by applicable law or applicable rules of any
stock exchange) by a duly authorized officer of the Company.
4.17. Gender and
Number. Where the context admits, words in
any gender shall include any other gender, words in the singular
shall include the plural and the plural shall include the
singular.
Section 5 Committee
5.1. Administration. The
authority to control and manage the operation and administration
of the Plan shall be vested in a committee (the
“Committee”) in accordance with this Section 5.
5.2. Selection of
Committee. The Committee shall be selected by
the Board, and shall consist of two or more members of the Board.
A-7
5.3. Powers of
Committee. The authority to manage and
control the operation and administration of the Plan shall be
vested in the Committee, subject to the following:
(a) Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee
will have the authority and discretion to select from among the
Eligible Individuals those persons who shall receive Awards, to
determine the time or times of receipt, to determine the types
of Awards and the number of shares covered by the Awards, to
establish the terms, conditions, performance criteria,
restrictions, and other provisions of such Awards, and, subject
to the restrictions imposed by Section 6, to cancel or
suspend Awards. In making such Award determinations, the
Committee may take into account the nature of services rendered
by the individual, the individual’s present and potential
contribution to the Company’s success and such other
factors as the Committee deems relevant.
(b) Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee
will have the authority and discretion to determine the extent
to which Awards under the Plan will be structured to conform to
the requirements applicable to performance-based compensation as
described in Code Section 162(m), and to take such action,
establish such procedures, and impose such restrictions at the
time such Awards are granted as the Committee determines to be
necessary or appropriate to conform to such requirements.
(c) The Committee will have the authority and discretion to
establish terms and conditions of Awards as the Committee
determines to be necessary or appropriate to conform to
applicable requirements or practices of jurisdictions outside of
the United States.
(d) The Committee will have the authority and discretion to
interpret the Plan, to establish, amend, and rescind any rules
and regulations relating to the Plan, to determine the terms and
provisions of any agreements made pursuant to the Plan, and to
make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable
for the administration of the Plan.
(e) Any interpretation of the Plan by the Committee and any
decision made by it under the Plan is final and binding.
(f) Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan,
where the Committee is authorized to make a determination with
respect to any Award, such determination shall be made at the
time the Award is made, except that the Committee may reserve
the authority to have such determination made by the Committee
in the future (but only if such reservation is made at the time
the Award is granted and is expressly stated in the Agreement
reflecting the Award).
(g) In controlling and managing the operation and
administration of the Plan, the Committee shall act by a
majority of its then members, by meeting or by a writing, which
may be electronic, filed without a meeting. The Committee shall
maintain and keep adequate records concerning the Plan and
concerning its proceedings and acts in such form and detail as
the Committee may decide.
5.4 Delegation by
Committee. Except to the extent prohibited by
applicable law or the applicable rules of a stock exchange, the
Committee may allocate all or any portion of its
responsibilities and powers to any one or more of its members
and may delegate all or any part of its responsibilities and
powers to any person or persons selected by it. Any such
allocation or delegation may be revoked by the Committee at any
time.
5.5 Information to be Furnished to
Committee. The Company and Related Companies
shall furnish the Committee with such data and information as
may be required for it to discharge its duties. The records of
the Company and Related Companies as to an Eligible
Individual’s employment or other provision of services,
termination of employment or cessation of the provision of
services, leave of absence, reemployment and compensation shall
be conclusive on all persons unless determined to be incorrect.
Participants and other persons entitled to benefits under the
Plan must furnish the Committee such evidence, data or
information as the Committee considers desirable to carry out
the terms of the Plan.
A-8
Section 6 Effect,
Discontinuance, Cancellation, Amendment and Termination
6.1 Effect on Other Awards or
Bonuses. Neither adoption of the Plan nor the
grant of Awards to a Participant will affect the Company’s
right to grant to such Participant Awards that are not subject
to the Plan, to issue to such Participant Stock as a bonus or
otherwise, or to adopt other plans or arrangements under which
Stock may be issued to Eligible Individuals.
6.2 Discontinuance, Cancellation, Amendment and
Termination. The Board may at any time
discontinue granting Awards under the Plan. The Board may at any
time or times alter or amend the Plan or any outstanding Award
for any purpose which may at the time be permitted by law, or
may at any time terminate the Plan as to any further grants of
Awards, provided that (except to the extent expressly required
or permitted by the Plan) no such amendment will, without the
approval of (a) the Company’s stockholders, to the
extent stockholder approval of the amendment is required by
applicable law or regulations or the requirements of the
principal exchange or interdealer quotation system on which the
Stock is listed or quoted, (i) increase the maximum number
of shares, or the types of Awards, available under the Plan,
(ii) change the group of Eligible Individuals,
(iii) extend the time within which Awards may be granted,
(iv) materially increase the benefits to Participants,
including any material change to permit a repricing (or decrease
in exercise price) of outstanding Options, reduce the price at
which shares of Stock or Options may be offered, or
(v) amend the provisions of this Section 6.2, and
(b) each affected Participant if the amendment, alteration
or termination would adversely affect the Participant’s
rights or obligations under any Award made prior to the date of
the amendment, alteration or termination. The termination of the
Plan would not affect the validity of any Award outstanding on
the date of termination.
A-9
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
(Approved by Stockholders
on )
The following constitute the provisions of the 2007 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Harris Interactive Inc.
1. Purpose. The purpose of the
Plan is to provide employees of the Company and its Designated
Subsidiaries with an opportunity to purchase Common Stock of the
Company through accumulated payroll deductions. It is the
intention of the Company to have the Plan qualify as an
“Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The provisions
of the Plan, accordingly, shall be construed so as to extend and
limit participation in a manner consistent with the requirements
of that section of the Code.
2. Definitions.
(a) “Board” shall mean the Board of
Directors of the Company.
(b) “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.
(c) “Common Stock” shall mean the Common
Stock of the Company.
(d) “Company” shall mean Harris
Interactive Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any Designated
Subsidiary of the Company.
(e) “Compensation” shall mean all base
straight time gross earnings and commissions, but exclusive of
payments for overtime, shift premium, incentive compensation,
incentive payments, bonuses and other compensation.
(f) “Designated Subsidiary” shall mean
any Subsidiary which has been designated by the Board from time
to time in its sole discretion as eligible to participate in the
Plan.
(g) “Employee” shall mean any individual
who is an Employee of the Company for tax purposes whose
customary employment with the Company is at least twenty
(20) hours per week and more than five (5) months in
any calendar year. For purposes of the Plan, the employment
relationship shall be treated as continuing intact while the
individual is on sick leave or other leave of absence approved
by the Company. Where the period of leave exceeds 90 days
and the individual’s right to reemployment is not
guaranteed either by statute or by contract, the employment
relationship shall be deemed to have terminated on the
91st day of such leave.
(h) “Enrollment Date” shall mean the first
day of each Offering Period.
(i) “Exercise Date” shall mean the last
day of each Offering Period.
(j) “Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of
any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:
(i) If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock
exchange or a national market system, including without
limitation the Nasdaq stock exchange, its Fair Market Value
shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing
bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or
system for the last market trading day on the date of such
determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such
other source as the Board deems reliable, or;
(ii) If the Common Stock is regularly quoted by a
recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not
reported, its Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the closing
bid and asked prices for the Common Stock on the date of such
determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such
other source as the Board deems reliable, or;
(iii) In the absence of an established market for the
Common Stock, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined
in good faith by the Board.
B-1
(k) “Offering Period” shall mean a period
ranging from three (3) months to twenty four
(24) months (the precise duration of any Offering Period to
be the Offering Period announced at least five (5) days
prior to its commencement as set forth in Section 4 of this
Plan) during which an option granted pursuant to the Plan may be
exercised, commencing on the first Trading Day on or after the
termination date of the previous Offering Period; provided,
however, that the first Offering Period under the Plan shall
commence with the first Trading Day on or after the date on
which the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the
Company’s Registration Statement effective and ending on
the last Trading Day on or before the termination of the
duration of such Offering Period selected by the Board. The
duration and timing of Offering Periods may be changed pursuant
to Section 4 of this Plan.
|
|
|
| |
(l)
|
“Plan” shall mean this Employee Stock Purchase
Plan.
|
(m) “Purchase Price” shall mean an amount
equal to 85% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock
on the Enrollment Date or on the Exercise Date, whichever is
lower; provided, however, that the Purchase Price may be
adjusted by the Board pursuant to Section 20.
(n) “Reserves” shall mean the number of
shares of Common Stock covered by each option under the Plan
which have not yet been exercised and the number of shares of
Common Stock which have been authorized for issuance under the
Plan but not yet placed under option.
(o) “Subsidiary” shall mean a corporation,
domestic or foreign, of which not less than 50% of the voting
shares are held by the Company or a Subsidiary, whether or not
such corporation now exists or is hereafter organized or
acquired by the Company or a Subsidiary.
(p) “Trading Day” shall mean a day on
which national stock exchanges and the Nasdaq exchange are open
for trading.
3. Eligibility.
(a) Any Employee who shall be employed by the Company on a
given Enrollment Date shall be eligible to participate in the
Plan.
(b) Any provisions of the Plan to the contrary
notwithstanding, no Employee shall be granted an option under
the Plan (i) to the extent that, immediately after the
grant, such Employee (or any other person whose stock would be
attributed to such Employee pursuant to Section 424(d) of
the Code) would own capital stock of the Company
and/or hold
outstanding options to purchase such stock possessing five
percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value
of all classes of the capital stock of the Company or of any
Subsidiary, or (ii) to the extent that his or her rights to
purchase stock under all employee stock purchase plans of the
Company
and/or of
any Subsidiary accrues at a rate which exceeds Twenty Five
Thousand Dollars ($25,000) worth of stock (determined at the
fair market value of the shares at the time such option is
granted) for each calendar year in which such option is
outstanding at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Board may provide from time to time that employees who are
highly compensated employees within the meaning of
Section 423(b)(4)(D) of the Code shall not be eligible to
participate.
4. Offering Periods. The Plan
shall be implemented by consecutive Offering Periods with a new
Offering Period commencing on the first Trading Day on or after
the termination of the previous Offering Period, or on such
other date as the Board shall determine, and continuing
thereafter until terminated in accordance with Section 20
hereof. The Board shall have the power to change the duration of
Offering Periods (including the commencement dates thereof) with
respect to future offerings without stockholder approval if such
change is announced at least five (5) days prior to the
scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected
thereafter.
5. Participation.
(a) An eligible Employee may become a participant in the
Plan by completing a subscription agreement authorizing payroll
deductions in the form of Exhibit A to this Plan and
filing it with the Company’s payroll office prior to the
applicable Enrollment Date.
B-2
(b) Payroll deductions for a participant shall commence on
the first payroll following the Enrollment Date and shall end on
the last payroll in the Offering Period to which such
authorization is applicable.
6. Payroll Deductions.
(a) At the time a participant files his or her subscription
agreement, he or she shall elect to have payroll deductions made
on each pay day during the Offering Period in an amount not
exceeding ten percent (10%) of the Compensation which he or she
receives on each pay day during the Offering Period.
(b) All payroll deductions made for a participant shall be
credited to his or her account under the Plan and shall be
withheld in whole percentages only. A participant may not make
any additional payments into such account.
(c) A participant may increase or decrease (including to
zero percent) the rate of his or her payroll deductions during
the Offering Period by completing or filing with the Company a
new subscription agreement authorizing a change in payroll
deduction rate. The Board may, in its discretion, limit the
number of participation rate changes during any Offering Period.
The change in rate shall be effective with the first full
payroll period following five (5) business days after the
Company’s receipt of the new subscription agreement unless
the Company elects to process a given change in participation
more quickly. A participant’s subscription agreement shall
remain in effect for successive Offering Periods unless
terminated as provided in Section 10 hereof.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent necessary
to comply with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code and
Section 3(b) hereof, a participant’s payroll
deductions may be decreased to zero percent at any time during
an Offering Period. Payroll deductions shall recommence at the
rate provided in such participant’s subscription agreement
at the beginning of the first Offering Period which is scheduled
to end in the following calendar year.
(e) At the time the option is exercised, in whole or in
part, or at the time some or all of the Company’s Common
Stock issued under the Plan is disposed of, the participant must
make adequate provision for the Company’s federal, state or
other tax withholding obligations, if any, which arise upon the
exercise of the option or the disposition of the Common Stock.
At any time, the Company may, but shall not be obligated to,
withhold from the participant’s compensation the amount
necessary for the Company to meet applicable withholding
obligations, including any withholding required to make
available to the Company any tax deductions or benefits
attributable to sale or early disposition of Common Stock by the
Employee.
7. Grant of Option. On the
Enrollment Date of each Offering Period, each eligible Employee
participating in such Offering Period shall be granted an option
to purchase on each Exercise Date during such Offering Period
(at the applicable Purchase Price) up to a number of shares of
the Company’s Common Stock determined by dividing such
Employee’s payroll deductions accumulated prior to such
Exercise Date and retained in the participant’s account as
of the Exercise Date by the applicable Purchase Price; provided
that in no event shall an Employee be permitted to purchase
during each Offering Period more than 5,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock (subject to any adjustment pursuant
to Section 19), and provided further that such purchase
shall be subject to the limitations set forth in
Sections 3(b) and 12 hereof. Exercise of the option shall
occur as provided in Section 8 hereof. The option shall
expire on the last day of the Offering Period.
8. Exercise of Option. A
participant’s option for the purchase of shares shall be
exercised automatically on the Exercise Date, and the maximum
number of full shares subject to option shall be purchased for
such participant at the applicable Purchase Price with the
accumulated payroll deductions in his or her account. No
fractional shares shall be purchased; any payroll deductions
accumulated in a participant’s account which are not
sufficient to purchase a full share shall be retained in the
participant’s account for the subsequent Offering Period,
unless prior to such period the participant has terminated
participation in the Plan as provided in Section 10 hereof.
Any other monies left over in a participant’s account after
the Exercise Date shall be returned to the participant. During a
participant’s lifetime, a participant’s option to
purchase shares hereunder is exercisable only by him or her.
B-3
9. Delivery. As promptly as
practicable after each Exercise Date on which a purchase of
shares occurs, the Company shall arrange the delivery to each
participant, as appropriate, of a certificate representing the
shares purchased upon exercise of his or her option.
10. Withdrawal. A participant may
withdraw from an Offering Period. A participant may terminate
participation in the Plan for any future Offering Period by
giving written notice of termination to the Company in the form
of Exhibit B.
11. Termination of
Employment. Upon a participant’s ceasing
to be an Employee, for any reason, he or she shall be deemed to
have elected to withdraw from the Plan and the payroll
deductions credited to such participant’s account during
the Offering Period but not yet used to exercise the option
shall be returned to such participant or, in the case of his or
her death, to the person or persons entitled thereto under
Section 15 hereof, and such participant’s option shall
be automatically terminated. The preceding sentence
notwithstanding, a participant who receives payment in lieu of
notice of termination of employment shall be treated as
continuing to be an Employee for the participant’s
customary number of hours per week of employment during the
period in which the participant is subject to such payment in
lieu of notice.
12. Interest. No interest shall
accrue on the payroll deductions of a participant in the Plan.
13. Stock.
(a) Subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of
the Company as provided in Section 19 hereof, the maximum
number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock which shall
be made available for sale under the Plan shall be five hundred
thousand (500,000) shares. If, on a given Exercise Date, the
number of shares with respect to which options are to be
exercised exceeds the number of shares then available under the
Plan, the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares
remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall
be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable.
(b) The participant shall have no interest or voting right
in shares covered by his or her option until such option has
been exercised.
(c) Shares to be delivered to a participant under the Plan
shall be registered in the name of the participant or in the
name of the participant and his or her spouse. Certificates
representing shares may contain such legends as may be necessary
or appropriate pursuant to applicable securities laws, including
any legends relating to restrictions on transfer as may be
imposed by the Board pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan.
14. Administration. The Plan shall
be administered by the Board or a committee of members of the
Board appointed by the Board. The Board or its committee shall
have full and exclusive discretionary authority to construe,
interpret and apply the terms of the Plan, to determine
eligibility and to adjudicate all disputed claims filed under
the Plan. Every finding, decision and determination made by the
Board or its committee shall, to the full extent permitted by
law, be final and binding upon all parties.
15. Designation of Beneficiary.
(a) A participant may file a written designation of a
beneficiary who is to receive any shares and cash, if any, from
the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of
such participant’s death subsequent to an Exercise Date on
which the option is exercised but prior to delivery to such
participant of such shares and cash. In addition, a participant
may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to
receive any cash from the participant’s account under the
Plan in the event of such participant’s death prior to
exercise of the option. If a participant is married and the
designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent shall
be required for such designation to be effective.
(b) Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the
participant at any time by written notice. In the event of the
death of a participant and in the absence of a beneficiary
validly designated under the Plan who is living at the time of
such participant’s death, the Company shall deliver such
shares
and/or cash
to the executor or administrator of the estate of the
participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been
appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its
discretion, may deliver such shares
and/or cash
to the spouse or to any one or more dependents or relatives of
the participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known
to the Company, then to such other person as the Company may
designate.
B-4
16. Transferability. Neither
payroll deductions credited to a participant’s account nor
any rights with regard to the exercise of an option or to
receive shares under the Plan may be assigned, transferred,
pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way (other than by will,
the laws of descent and distribution or as provided in
Section 15 hereof) by the participant. Any such attempt at
assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition shall be
without effect. The Board shall have the power to impose such
restrictions on the transfer of shares of Common Stock that may
be issued under the Plan during any Offering Period, if such
restrictions are announced at least five (5) days prior to
the scheduled beginning of the Offering Period to be affected by
such restrictions.
17. Use of Funds. All payroll
deductions received or held by the Company under the Plan may be
used by the Company for any corporate purpose, and the Company
shall not be obligated to segregate such payroll deductions.
18. Reports. Individual accounts
shall be maintained for each participant in the Plan. Statements
of account shall be given to participating Employees at least
annually, which statements shall set forth the amounts of
payroll deductions, the Purchase Price, the number of shares
purchased and the remaining cash balance, if any.
19. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization,
Dissolution, Liquidation, Merger or Asset
Sale.
(a) Changes in
Capitalization. Subject to any required
action by the stockholders of the Company, the Reserves, the
maximum number of shares each participant may purchase each
Offering Period (pursuant to Section 7), as well as the
price per share and the number of shares of Common Stock covered
by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised
shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease
in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a
stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or
reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or
decrease in the number of shares of Common Stock effected
without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided,
however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the
Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without
receipt of consideration.” Such adjustment shall be made by
the Board, whose determination in that respect shall be final,
binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no
issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or
securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall
affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with
respect to, the number or price of shares of Common Stock
subject to an option.
(b) Dissolution or Liquidation. In
the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the
Company, the Offering Period then in progress shall be shortened
by setting a new Exercise Date (the “New Exercise
Date”), and shall terminate immediately prior to the
consummation of such proposed dissolution or liquidation, unless
provided otherwise by the Board. The New Exercise Date shall be
before the date of the Company’s proposed dissolution or
liquidation. The Board shall notify each participant in writing,
at least ten (10) business days prior to the New Exercise
Date, that the Exercise Date for the participant’s option
has been changed to the New Exercise Date and that the
participant’s option shall be exercised automatically on
the New Exercise Date, unless prior to such date the participant
has terminated participation in the Plan as provided in
Section 10 hereof.
(c) Merger or Asset Sale. In the
event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the
assets of the Company, or the merger of the Company with or into
another corporation, each outstanding option shall be assumed or
an equivalent option substituted by the successor corporation or
a parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation. In the
event that the successor corporation refuses to assume or
substitute for the option, any Offering Periods then in progress
shall end on the New Exercise Date. The New Exercise Date shall
be before the date of the Company’s proposed sale or
merger. The Board shall notify each participant in writing, at
least ten (10) business days prior to the New Exercise
Date, that the Exercise Date for the participant’s option
has been changed to the New Exercise Date and that the
participant’s option shall be exercised automatically on
the New Exercise Date, unless prior to such date the participant
has terminated participation in the Plan as provided in
Section 10 hereof.
B-5
20. Amendment or Termination.
(a) The Board of Directors of the Company may at any time
and for any reason terminate or amend the Plan. Except as
provided in Section 19 hereof, no such termination can
affect options previously granted, provided that an Offering
Period may be terminated by the Board of Directors on any
Exercise Date if the Board determines that the termination of
the Plan is in the best interests of the Company and its
stockholders. Except as provided in Section 19 hereof and
this Section 20, no amendment may make any change in any
option theretofore granted which adversely affects the rights of
any participant. To the extent necessary to comply with
Section 423 of the Code (or any successor rule or provision
or any other applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule),
the Company shall obtain stockholder approval in such a manner
and to such a degree as required.
(b) Without stockholder consent and without regard to
whether any participant rights may be considered to have been
“adversely affected,” the Board (or its committee)
shall be entitled to change the Offering Periods, limit the
frequency
and/or
number of changes in the amount withheld during an Offering
Period, establish the exchange ratio applicable to amounts
withheld in a currency other than U.S. dollars, permit
payroll withholding in excess of the amount designated by a
participant in order to adjust for delays or mistakes in the
Company’s processing of properly completed withholding
elections, establish reasonable waiting and adjustment periods
and/or
accounting and crediting procedures to ensure that amounts
applied toward the purchase of Common Stock for each participant
properly correspond with amounts withheld from the
participant’s Compensation, and establish such other
limitations or procedures as the Board (or its committee)
determines in its sole discretion advisable which are consistent
with the Plan.
(c) In the event the Board determines that the ongoing
operation of the Plan may result in unfavorable financial
accounting consequences, the Board may, in its discretion and,
to the extent necessary or desirable, modify or amend the Plan
to reduce or eliminate such accounting consequences including,
but not limited to:
(i) altering the Purchase Price for any Offering Period
including an Offering Period underway at the time of the change
in the Purchase Price;
(ii) shortening any Offering Period so that Offering Period
end on a new Exercise Date, including an Offering Period
underway at the time of the Board action; and
(iii) allocating shares.
Such modifications or amendments shall not require stockholder
approval or the consent of any Plan participants.
21. Notices. All notices or other
communications by a participant to the Company under or in
connection with the Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given
when received in the form specified by the Company at the
location, or by the person, designated by the Company for the
receipt thereof.
22. Conditions Upon issuance of
Shares. Shares shall not be issued with
respect to an option unless the exercise of such option and the
issuance and delivery of such shares pursuant thereto shall
comply with all applicable provisions of law, domestic or
foreign, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and
the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the shares may
then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of
counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.
As a condition to the exercise of an option, the Company may
require the person exercising such option to represent and
warrant at the time of any such exercise that the shares are
being purchased only for investment and without any present
intention to sell or distribute such shares if, in the opinion
of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by
any of the aforementioned applicable provisions of law.
23. Term of Plan. The Plan shall
become effective upon its approval by the stockholders of the
Company. It shall continue in effect for a term of ten years
unless sooner terminated under Section 20 hereof.
B-6
Exhibit A
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
| |
|
|
|
o Original
Application
|
|
Enrollment
Date:
|
|
o Change
in Payroll Deduction Rate
|
|
|
|
o Change
of Beneficiary(ies)
|
|
|
1)
hereby elects to participate in the Harris Interactive Inc. 2007
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Stock Purchase
Plan”) and subscribes to purchase shares of the
Company’s Common Stock in accordance with this Subscription
Agreement and the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
2) I hereby authorize payroll deductions from each paycheck
in the amount of % of my
Compensation on each payday (from 1 to
%) during the Offering
Period in accordance with the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Please note that no fractional percentages are permitted.)
3) I understand that said payroll deductions shall be
accumulated for the purchase of shares of Common Stock at the
applicable Purchase Price determined in accordance with the 2007
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. I understand that I may withdraw
from an Offering Period and also that any accumulated payroll
deductions will be used to automatically exercise my option.
4) I have received a copy of the complete 2007 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. I understand that my participation in the
2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is in all respects subject to
the terms of the Plan. I understand that my ability to exercise
the option under this Subscription Agreement is subject to
stockholder approval of the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
5) Shares purchased for me under the 2007 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan should be issued in the name(s) of (Employee or
Employee and Spouse
only): .
6) I understand that if I dispose of any shares received by
me pursuant to the Plan within two (2) years after the
Enrollment Date (the first day of the Offering Period during
which I purchased such shares) or one (1) year after the
Exercise Date, I will be treated for federal income tax purposes
as having received ordinary income at the time of such
disposition in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market
value of the shares at the time such shares were purchased by me
over the price which I paid for the shares. I hereby agree to
notify the Company in writing within 30 days after the date
of any disposition of my shares and I will make adequate
provision for Federal, state or other tax withholding
obligations, if any, which arise upon the disposition of the
Common Stock. The Company may, but will not be obligated to,
withhold from my compensation the amount necessary to meet any
applicable withholding obligation including any withholding
necessary to make available to the Company any tax deductions or
benefits attributable to sale or early disposition of Common
Stock by me. If I dispose of such shares at any time after the
expiration of the 2 year and 1 year holding periods, I
understand that I will be treated for federal income tax
purposes as having received income only at the time of such
disposition, and that such income will be taxed as ordinary
income only to the extent of an amount equal to the lesser of
(1) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at
the time of such disposition over the purchase price which I
paid for the shares, or (2) 15% of the fair market value of
the shares on the first day of the Offering Period. The
remainder of the gain, if any, recognized on such disposition
will be taxed as capital gain.
7) I hereby agree to be bound by the terms of the 2007
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, including any restrictions on the
transferability of any shares received by me pursuant to the
Plan. The effectiveness of this Subscription Agreement is
dependent upon my eligibility to participate in the 2007
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
B-7
8) In the event of my death, I hereby designate the
following as my beneficiary(ies) to receive all payments and
shares due me under the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
NAME: (Please
print)
(First) (Middle) (Last)
Relationship:
(Address):
Employee’s Social Security
Number:
Employee’s
Address:
I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT SHALL REMAIN IN
EFFECT THROUGHOUT SUCCESSIVE OFFERING PERIODS UNLESS TERMINATED
BY ME.
Dated:
Signature of Employee
Spouse’s Signature
(If beneficiary other than spouse)
B-8
Exhibit B
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
NOTICE OF TERMINATION
The undersigned participant in the Offering Period of the Harris
Interactive Inc. 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan terminates
participation in the Plan, effective at the commencement of the
next Offering Period. The undersigned understands and agrees
that his or her option for such Offering Period will be
automatically terminated. The undersigned understands further
that no further payroll deductions will be made for the purchase
of shares in the next Offering Period and the undersigned shall
be eligible to participate in succeeding Offering Periods only
by delivering to the Company a new Subscription Agreement.
Name and Address of Participant:
Signature:
Date:
B-9
| |
|
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
60 CORPORATE WOODS
ROCHESTER, NY 14623
|
VOTE BY
INTERNET — www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic
delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the
cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you
access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and
to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDER
COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Harris Interactive Inc. in
mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy
statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the
Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions
above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you
agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in
future years.
VOTE BY PHONE — 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until
11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.
Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid
envelope we have provided or return it to Harris Interactive Inc.,
c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
|
|
|
|
| TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
HARIN1
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “For”
all Nominees and “For” Proposals 2, 3 and 4
Vote on Directors
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Election of Class II Directors: |
|
For
All |
|
Withhold
For All |
|
For All
Except |
|
To withhold authority to vote for
any individual nominee(s), mark
“For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee’s on the line below. |
(01) Stephen D. Harlan
|
|
(03) Antoine G. Treuille
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
(02) Howard L. Shecter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote on Proposals |
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. Approval of the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan |
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. Approval of the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors for Fiscal Year 2008
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may
properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
| |
|
NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name or names
appear(s) on this proxy. When shares are held jointly,
each holder should sign. When signing as executor,
administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give
full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please
sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving
full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership’s name by authorized person. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
|
Date |
REVOCABLE PROXY
HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
60 CORPORATE WOODS, ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14623
PROXY SOLICITED BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HARRIS INTERACTIVE
INC. FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2007
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Leonard R. Bayer and Ronald E. Salluzzo, and
each of them, as proxies (the “Proxies”) of the undersigned, with full power of substitution in
each, and authorizes each of them to represent and to vote all shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of Harris Interactive Inc. (“Harris Interactive”) held of record by the
undersigned as of the close of business on September 4, 2007, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 at the Memorial Art Gallery, 500
University Avenue, Rochester, New York 14607 at 5:15 p.m. (local time), and at any adjournments
thereof.
When properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder(s). IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH
NOMINEE SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE SIDE IN PROPOSAL 1, FOR PROPOSAL 2 TO APPROVE THE 2007
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN, FOR PROPOSAL 3 TO APPROVE THE 2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN,
FOR PROPOSAL 4 TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP AS HARRIS
INTERACTIVE’S AUDITORS FOR FISCAL 2008, AND WITH DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY ON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS
MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF. Stockholders also have the
option of voting by telephone or via the Internet, and may revoke this proxy, following procedures
described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
The undersigned hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy
Statement, dated September 12, 2007, and a copy of Harris Interactive’s 2007 Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The undersigned hereby revoke(s) any proxy or proxies
heretofore given with respect to the Annual Meeting.
PLEASE DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.