Check the appropriate box:

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

 

 

Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Our Stockholders:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of LendingClub Corporation (the “Company,” “LendingClub,” “we,” “us” and “our”) will be held on June 3, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LC2025 (the “Annual Meeting”). There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to:

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 7, 2025, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Jordan Cheng

San Francisco, California

April 23, 2025

Whether or not you expect to participate in the Annual Meeting, please vote via the Internet, by phone, or complete, date, sign and promptly return the accompanying proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope (if applicable) so that your shares may be represented at the Annual Meeting.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON

JUNE 3, 2025: THIS PROXY STATEMENT, PROXY, AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM

Dear Stockholders,

As a digitally-native, information-driven, customer-focused company, and one of a small number of fintech companies with a national bank charter, we are continuing to build a new kind of bank, one that aims to advantage our members with the information, tools, and guidance they need to achieve their own version of financial success. We do this by leveraging data and technology to increase access to credit, lower borrowing costs, and improve the return on savings – all through a smart, simple, and rewarding digital experience. Since our founding, more than 5 million individuals have become members, and we have facilitated more than $100 billion of loans.

We are pleased with what we accomplished in 2024. Among other things, we successfully exited our operating agreement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) on time, maintained our credit outperformance, grew our balance sheet by 20% and our deposit base by 24%, increased net income by 32% and ended the year with improving non-interest income through higher loan sale prices. In tandem with achieving these milestones, we advanced our longer-term strategy to increase engagement with our products and services. Notably, we acquired award-winning debt management technology from Tally Technologies to enhance our DebtIQ^TM debt monitoring tool, launched new LevelUp Savings and TopUp products for our consumer savers and borrowers, and created a new rated Structured Loan Certificates program for our loan investors.

Meeting our ambitions requires that we recruit and retain employees with a compelling combination of opportunity, culture and compensation. As a fintech company with a substantial presence in the San Francisco Bay Area, we have historically operated a broad-based, equity-oriented, long-term incentive program to deliver market-required compensation. This, however, created meaningful levels of dilution and in 2023 we made a commitment to materially reduce the overhang and annual utilization rate from our equity compensation program to below 20% and 4%, respectively, by the end of 2027. We engaged with many of our largest stockholders on the topic and they were nearly universally supportive of this commitment and our related initiatives to reduce dilution, including using cash compensation in lieu of equity compensation. We encourage you to review pages 3 and 4 of our Proxy Statement for more information on the progress we have made in reducing dilution from our compensation programs.

Further, we have included two important governance proposals for your consideration. First, we continue to believe in the merits of a declassified board and have again included a proposal this year to phase out our current classified board structure. Second, we have again included a proposal this year to remove the supermajority voting standard to amend our governing documents. In 2024, more than 99% of our stockholders that voted supported these measures; however, we did not receive the necessary two-thirds support from all outstanding shares for these measures to pass. These proposals, along with our efforts to reduce the dilution from our compensation programs, address the most common areas of stockholder feedback. We therefore strongly encourage you, most importantly, to vote, and we also recommend that you vote “FOR” each of these proposals.

Although macroeconomic uncertainty continues to persist into 2025, with our award-winning products, market-leading data science capabilities, innovation-oriented culture and seasoned executive team, we remain optimistic about our future and committed to creating value for our stockholders, as well as our customers, employees and communities.

On behalf of the Board, thank you for your investment in LendingClub.

Sincerely,

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), Proxy Statement, form of proxy and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (the “Annual Report”) will be first distributed and made available to stockholders on or about April 23, 2025.

LendingClub Corporation (including its subsidiaries, “LendingClub”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) is a publicly traded bank holding company and operates a leading, nationally chartered, digital marketplace that leverages data and technology to increase access to credit, lower borrowing costs, and improve returns on savings. We offer a suite of deposit and loan products through a smart, simple and rewarding digital experience. We retain a portion of the loans we originate and sell the remainder to marketplace investors including banks, credit unions, asset managers and private credit funds. Since our founding, more than 5 million individuals have become members and we have facilitated more than $95 billion of loans.

To execute on our vision, grow the business responsibly and create value for our stockholders, it is critical that we have a sophisticated, dedicated and committed management team, overseen by an independent Board of Directors (the “Board”) with substantial and relevant expertise.

Our management team and Board are deeply focused on the evolution, execution and oversight of our strategy. Below is a summary of certain key 2024 strategic priorities and how we executed against them.

Our Board believes it is important to maintain an open dialogue with stockholders to understand their views on the Company, its strategy and its governance and compensation practices. Therefore, we engage with stockholders regularly and solicit feedback annually on our compensation and governance practices. Members of our management team participate in these conversations, and stockholders are also offered the opportunity to speak with a member of our Board. Stockholders have overwhelmingly expressed support for the proactive approach the Company has taken to solicit and incorporate stockholder feedback.

Overall, the stockholders we engaged with have expressed support for our strategy, and compensation and governance practices. Below is a summary of feedback we received from our stockholders and how we’ve responded.

In connection with our proposal in 2023 to amend and restate our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan Proposal”), we made an accompanying commitment to materially reduce the dilution created from our equity compensation program. Specifically, our stated targets are to reduce the overhang and annual utilization rate from our equity compensation program to below 20% and 4%, respectively, by the end of 2027. This commitment and these targets are reflective of feedback we received from stockholders.

In discussing with stockholders, we noted the substantial measures we had already taken to manage dilution, including:

Further, in connection with the Equity Plan Proposal, we took the following steps to reinforce our commitment to managing dilution:

In our discussions with stockholders, stockholders appreciated and acknowledged that equity compensation is a fundamental component of the Company’s ability to deliver competitive levels of compensation and that further reductions in equity compensation would need to be offset by increases in cash compensation in order to retain the human capital necessary to execute and advance the Company’s strategy.

Our equity awards are denominated in dollars to employees and then converted into shares/units; typically, by dividing the intended target dollar value by the 30-day trailing average of the Company’s stock price. Consequently, an increasing stock price results in reduced dilution as fewer shares are required to cover the intended target dollar value of an equity award. The Company considered the merits of not implementing any program changes and instead waiting for stock price appreciation to naturally reduce the dilution created from its equity compensation program. However, the Company determined that being more proactive with respect to reducing dilution, without the benefit of stock price appreciation, was preferable given the nearly universal feedback the Company received from its stockholders on the importance and urgency of reducing dilution.

Accordingly, in Q1 2024 we adopted a program whereby all long-term awards, including those granted to executives, are bifurcated into an equity portion (e.g., PBRSU and/or RSU) and a fixed value cash-based portion (the “Cash Award”), with the Cash Award vesting over 3-years like the equity portion. This program change is intended to decrease equity utilization while keeping target compensation levels intact and providing the Company another multi-year retention feature in its compensation program. We believe this program was the best available solution to balance reducing dilution, rewarding and retaining employees, and managing compensation expense. For executives, 25% of the intended target value of their long-term awards is allocated to a Cash Award, with the remaining 75% allocated to RSUs and PBRSUs.

The Company grants long-term awards quarterly, with a substantial majority of grants made in the Q1 grant cycle as the Q1 grant cycle includes annual refresh awards as compared to the Q2 through Q4 grant cycles which typically consist entirely of new-hire awards. The below graphic depicts the number of shares underlying long-term awards granted in Q1 of 2023, 2024 and 2025, illustrating our substantial progress on reducing our equity utilization and thereby placing the Company on track to meet its stated, and stockholder supported, objectives with respect to managing dilution.

Combination of Program Changes and Stock Price Appreciation

Driving Material Reductions in Dilution

 

Some of the statements in this Proxy Statement, including statements regarding financial results, our ability to effectuate and the effectiveness of Company strategy, the design of our compensation programs, the benefits of our products and services, Company performance and future equity utilization are “forward-looking statements.” The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those

contemplated by these forward-looking statements include those factors set forth in the section titled “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as well as in our subsequent filings made with the SEC. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in forward-looking statements. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Our mission is to relentlessly advantage our members by challenging the way banking is done. We provide smart, simple, and rewarding solutions that help our members achieve their financial goals. Since 2007, we have facilitated more than $100 billion in loans to over 5 million members, putting them on a path to paying down their existing debt at a lower cost. As a full-service bank, we’re intent on finding new value for our members across an array of financial products.

We believe that our business is inherently aligned with supporting many Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) matters, and that our current level of support for ESG matters is consistent with executing against our mission and in the best interest of our stakeholders. That said, with oversight from our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, we expect to incrementally evolve our strategy and disclosures on ESG matters over time based on stakeholder feedback and new rulemaking on the topic.

Our values are the foundation of what we strive to be, individually and collectively. They guide all aspects of our business, from strategic corporate decisions to promotions/hiring.

We aim to do our part in conserving the environment by incorporating environmental-related considerations and risks into certain aspects of our operations. Key actions we’ve taken to support the environment include:

LendingClub’s mission is to relentlessly advantage our members by challenging the way banking is done. We advance our mission through a technology-enabled business model that strives to provide smart, simple, and rewarding solutions that help our members achieve their financial goals.

This mission, combined with our values, has driven us to lead the financial industry in advancing several policies and programs designed to reduce disparities, protect consumers and small businesses from irresponsible financing practices, and encourage innovation that supports financial health.

We have also implemented a number of initiatives to support our members during difficult times. All of our members have a 15-day grace period to make loan payments with no penalty. We also launched a loan extension program, which extends the repayment term for eligible borrowers who fell behind on their loan payments and have resumed making regular payments. The program allows such borrowers to become current on their loan and pay any past-due amounts at the end of the loan’s new repayment term, and helps borrowers that may have experienced temporary financial difficulty. Additionally, we offer relief programs to eligible borrowers to provide flexibility during crises, like natural disasters.

We have also worked with external stakeholders to better understand the issues affecting consumer financial health. For example, from 2021 to 2023, we collaborated with PYMNTS to prepare twenty-nine paycheck-to-paycheck reports. Further, in 2024, we collaborated with Propeller Insights to conduct a national survey on credit card usage, debt management and personal finance. Through these collaborations, we sought to explore the paycheck-to-paycheck landscape and provide a deeper look into the core elements of American consumers’ financial wellness, including their income, savings, debt and spending choices.

Researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis found that LendingClub loans have had lower APRs than credit cards across FICO bands. Additionally, researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia have found that “consumers pay smaller spreads on loans from LendingClub than from credit card borrowing,” which is supported by our data that indicates that our members save approximately $2,400 on average over the term of a 36-month personal loan from LendingClub. These savings also extend to our auto refinance loans, which reduce the APRs members pay by over two percentage points and results in average savings of approximately $2,400 over the life of the auto loan.

card, free ATMs, rebates on ATM fees charged by other banks, and no monthly maintenance, overdraft, or incoming wire transfer fees. In fact, our checking product has earned official certification by the national Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund as meeting the BankOn National Standards for trust and affordability for consumer transactional accounts.

We promote an inclusive financial system where responsible innovation delivers better financial health outcomes. We strive to lend to those underserved by traditional banks and our digital marketplace model allows us to fill credit gaps for consumers where bank branches may be less available. Researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia have found that our credit model risk ratings have a low correlation with FICO scores while still effectively predicting credit risk at a high level of performance. This means that our digital credit models are able to identify consumers who would be overlooked or overpriced by traditional FICO-based models, providing more consumers with access to lower-priced credit. Additionally, a study by Federal Reserve researchers using LendingClub data found that fintech small business lending can create a more inclusive financial system by allowing small businesses that were less likely to receive credit from traditional lenders to access credit and do so at lower costs.

We are focused on supporting small businesses and believe that our small business lending activities have helped create or sustain over 100,000 jobs, in addition to helping the over 75,000 people that were able to

Bill of Rights has been signed by over 110 nonprofits, community development financial institutions, fintechs and banks and has inspired a wave of small business protection laws across the U.S.

We believe that innovation in the financial services industry can lower prices for small businesses. However, in order for small business customers to identify and benefit from lower prices, they need to be able to easily compare the prices they are being offered. Accordingly, LendingClub and its coalition partners helped lead the passage of the nation’s first small business truth-in-lending law, California Senate Bill 1235, to help protect small businesses from irresponsible lending that disproportionately harms entrepreneurs of color. Similar legislation has since passed in New York and Connecticut and has been introduced in Maryland, New Jersey and North Carolina. Finally, we endorsed a bill introduced in the United States House and Senate that would extend the transparency standards of the federal Truth in Lending Act to small business financing.

We are committed to sound and effective corporate governance practices. We have established a strong governance foundation through highly qualified directors, with strong oversight provided by our independent chairman. Further we have instituted significant stock ownership requirements for Board members and executives to promote strong alignment with stockholder interests. We also pursue robust stockholder engagement each year and have been responsive to stockholder feedback on key issues, including Board vote requirements, Board declassification, supermajority voting requirements and executive compensation programs.

We have also established key policies and guidelines that align with responsibly building value for our stockholders, including, among others, the following:

Corporate Governance Guidelines – Our Corporate Governance Guidelines promote the effective functioning of our Board and its committees, promote the interests of our stockholders, ensure a common set of expectations as to how our Board, its committees, individual directors and management should perform their functions, and provide a flexible framework within which the Board may conduct its business.

Business Conduct and Ethics Policy – Our business conduct and ethics policy applies to all our directors, officers, employees and authorized third-party representatives and promotes certain actions, including honest and ethical conduct, compliance with laws, rules and regulations, the protection of LendingClub assets (including corporate opportunities and confidential information), and fair dealing practices, among others.

Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines – Under guidelines adopted by our Compensation Committee, our CEO is required to hold an equity interest in LendingClub with a value of six times base salary, our CFO is required to hold an equity interest with a value of three times base salary, and all other Section 16 officers are required to hold an equity interest with a value of two times base salary. For additional information, see the section titled “Additional Governance Measures — Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 40.

Non-Employee Director Ownership Guidelines – Each non-employee director is required to hold an equity interest in LendingClub equal to at least $400,000 in value, which is 10x the base cash retainer for Board service. For additional information, see the section titled “Director Compensation — Director Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 24.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to recruit, develop, motivate and retain employees with the skills to execute our long-term strategy. We participate in a competitive market for talent and aim to distinguish ourselves by offering our employees the opportunity to make a meaningful positive impact on the financial health of Americans in an innovative technology-oriented environment. We also offer competitive compensation and benefits. Our compensation programs consist primarily of base salary, annual cash bonus opportunity and long-term equity and cash awards. We are committed to providing equal pay for equal work. To support this, we regularly conduct pay equity surveys to ensure our compensation programs are applied equitably across our workforce and benchmark ourselves against industry best practices. Our benefits programs consist of comprehensive health, dental and welfare benefits, including a 401(k) matching program and standalone mental health coverage. We also provide employees with opportunities to support their communities by providing dollar-for-dollar matching on qualified charitable donations up to $300 per year per eligible employee. Employees can also receive up to eight hours of paid time off for eligible volunteer activities. Since 2022, we have adopted a hybrid work model.

We strive to create a welcoming and empowering environment where our employees feel that they are reaching their full potential, are highly engaged and are doing what they do best every day to accomplish our mission and vision. We support our employees professionally through onboarding programs, on-the-job training, career development sessions and performance check-ins. We monitor employee satisfaction and engagement through semi-annual engagement surveys. The survey results provide an important measure of how employees experience our workplace, culture, priorities and values, and we use the survey results to make informed decisions about the LendingClub experience. During our most recent survey in the Fall of 2024, 94% of LendingClub employees responded. Our five highest rated categories were accountability, support, focus, feedback and fit. Our employee experience has earned a number of external recognitions, including being ranked #101, #44 and #38 on Newsweek’s list of America’s Most Loved Workplaces for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively; being named one of the 2022 Best Workplaces in Financial Services & Insurance by Great Place to Work^®and Fortune; USA Today’s Top Workplaces USA awards in 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025; Top Workplaces awards

for our Lehi, Utah office for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023; Greater Bay Area Top Workplaces award for our San Francisco, California office in 2022 and 2023; scores of 90, 95, 95, and a perfect score of 100 in the Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2025, 2024, 2023 and 2022 Corporate Equality Index, respectively; and inclusion on Bloomberg’s Gender-Equality Index in 2022 and 2023.

 

Diversity of background and experience are core to our corporate culture because, among other things, we believe a diversity of talent better reflects, and thereby better allows us to serve, our customer base. We have executive-sponsored leadership programs and resource groups for all employees as well as an allyship program designed to provide all interested employees with mentorship opportunities designed to enhance community and inclusiveness within the workplace. We also maintain a Business Conduct and Ethics Policy, which, among other things, sets forth numerous policies designed to provide for a safe, ethical, respectful and compliant work environment.

We are an equal opportunity employer and make employment decisions without regards to race, color, religion or religious creed, gender, gender identity, gender expression, transgender status, marital status, registered domestic partner status, age, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, genetic characteristics, sexual orientation, natural hairstyles, military or veteran status or any other considerations made unlawful by applicable federal, state or local laws (“protected characteristics”). We also prohibit discrimination or harassment based on any protected characteristics or the perception that anyone has any of these protected characteristics, or is associated with someone who has or is perceived as having any of these protected characteristics.

Below is a summary of certain demographic information of our full-time workforce as of December 31, 2024, and specifically those employees that serve in leadership positions (i.e., VP level and above).

 

Our Board oversees the strategy and overall business affairs of the Company. A key principle of our Company is maintaining the highest level of trust with customers, regulators, stockholders and employees. We have an active and engaged Board that is committed to fulfilling its fiduciary duties to our Company and stockholders, and helping us continue to earn the trust of our stakeholders. Currently all members of our Board also serve on the board of directors of our banking subsidiary, LendingClub Bank, and therefore are entrusted with monitoring and ensuring the safety and soundness of our banking operations as required by applicable banking regulations. Our Board is also responsible, in conjunction and consultation with the Compensation Committee, for periodically reviewing the performance of our CEO and for providing oversight of talent development and retention. Further, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for providing primary oversight and review of our progress and disclosures with respect to Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) matters.

Our Board currently has ten members and may establish a different number of authorized directors from time to time by resolution. All nine of our current non-employee directors are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Our Board is currently divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors is elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring. Our Board has proposed to phase out the classified board structure subject to stockholder approval of Proposal Four of this Proxy Statement at the Annual Meeting. If that proposal passes, our Board will phase into a structure in which all directors will be up for election each year to serve a term ending at the next annual meeting of stockholders.

Our Class II directors standing for re-election, if elected, will continue to serve as directors until the 2028 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

Our Board believes it is important to maintain an open dialogue with stockholders to understand their views on the Company, its strategy and its governance and compensation practices. Therefore, we engage with stockholders regularly and solicit feedback annually on our compensation and governance practices. Members of our management team participate in these conversations, and stockholders are also offered the opportunity to speak with a member of our Board.

In 2023, 2024 and early 2025, we reached out to stockholders representing, in aggregate, an estimated 50%, 46% and 33% of our then outstanding shares, respectively, and held meetings with those that requested a discussion. In 2023 and 2024, through our annual stockholder outreach, we had conversations with stockholders holding, in aggregate, an estimated 42% of our outstanding shares, including with the governance departments of some of our largest institutional stockholders. More recently, in 2025, the vast majority of stockholders declined our invitation for a discussion, with a number of our largest stockholders citing a lack of questions or concerns. In addition to our annual stockholder outreach on governance and compensation practices, we maintain ongoing dialogue with many of our stockholders through our investor relations program.

Overall, the stockholders we engaged with expressed support for our compensation and governance practices, including our efforts to declassify the Board and remove the supermajority voting standard. See “Proxy Summary – Responsiveness to Stockholder Feedback” beginning on page 2 for more information.

John C. (Hans) Morris serves as the independent Chairman of our Board.

While our Corporate Governance Guidelines do not require the separation of offices of the Chairperson of the Board and the Chief Executive, the Board believes an independent Chairperson reinforces the independence of our Board as a whole and results in an effective balancing of responsibilities, experience and independent perspective that meets the current corporate governance needs and oversight responsibilities of our Board. We believe this structure provides consistent and effective oversight of our management and is currently optimal for us and our stockholders.

In selecting Mr. Morris as the independent Chairman, the Board considered his strong and relevant experience in financial services technology and the financial services industry, ability to provide effective leadership and facilitate open dialogue, and ability to devote sufficient time and attention to the position.

Management is responsible for assessing and managing risk, subject to Board oversight directly and through its committees. The oversight responsibility of the Board and its committees is informed by reports from our management team, including our Chief Risk Officer and an internal audit team, which are designed to provide visibility to the Board about the identification and assessment of key risks and our risk mitigation strategies. In addition, the Board has requested and has been receiving regular updates from management regarding our response to the recent changes in the macroeconomic environment (including changing interest rates, inflation and market dynamics) and their impacts on us and our customers, employees and other stakeholders, and our efforts to mitigate these impacts.

The Board has delegated to the Operational Risk Committee and Credit Risk and Finance Committee (each comprised of independent directors) primary responsibility for the Board’s oversight of risk management. The Operational Risk Committee is primarily focused on reputational, legal, compliance and operational risk, including cybersecurity risk. The Credit Risk and Finance Committee is primarily focused on credit, market, interest rate and liquidity risk. In accordance with their charters, the Operational Risk Committee and Credit Risk and Finance Committee (collectively, the “Risk Committees”) assist our Board in its oversight of our key risks, including credit, technology and security, strategic, legal, regulatory (other than related to our financial reporting), compliance and operational risks, as well as the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating such risks. The Operational Risk Committee meets with our Chief Information Security Officer at least once per year to discuss the Company’s approach to cybersecurity risk management and to evaluate the status of our cybersecurity efforts, which include a broad range of tools and training initiatives that are designed to work together to protect the data and systems used in our business. The Operational Risk Committee also receives presentations and reports on cybersecurity risks and information regarding any cybersecurity incident that meets established reporting thresholds, as well as ongoing updates until such incident has been addressed. We have also established Management Risk Committees to oversee our enterprise risk management program and provide a central oversight function to identify, measure, monitor, evaluate and escalate key risks (including cybersecurity risk) for oversight at the Board level.

The other standing Board committees oversee risks associated with their respective areas of responsibility. For example, our Audit Committee has the responsibility for overseeing the integrity of our financial reporting, including related policies and procedures, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements affecting financial reporting, and overseeing our internal audit function. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that our Board is properly constituted to meet its statutory, fiduciary and corporate governance oversight obligations, and evaluates risk arising from governance matters. Our Compensation Committee evaluates risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, as more fully described in the section “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Risk Assessment” below.

Under the rules of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the rules of the NYSE require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the rules of the NYSE, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, among other things, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Our Board has reviewed its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our Board has determined that Syed Faiz Ahmad (Faiz Ahmad), Stephen Cutler, Allan Landon, Timothy Mayopoulos, John C. (Hans) Morris, Kathryn Reimann, Erin Selleck, Janey Whiteside and Michael Zeisser, representing nine of our current ten directors (and all of our current non-employee directors), do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. In making this determination, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.

In 2024, the Board held 8 meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our Board held during the period for which he or she has been a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our Board on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding annual meeting attendance by members of our Board, we encourage our directors to attend. Nine of our ten directors attended our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

In addition, each member of our Board is also a board member of our banking subsidiary, LendingClub Bank. In 2024, LendingClub Bank held a total of 60 meetings of the board or meetings of a committee of the board. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the board of LendingClub Bank during the period for which he or she has been a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board of LendingClub Bank on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

In conjunction with the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, the independent directors also periodically meet in executive sessions outside the presence of management. The independent Chairman of our Board, among other responsibilities, presides over such sessions.

Our Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Credit Risk and Finance Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and an Operational Risk Committee. The current composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our Board are described below.

Members serve on committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board. Each of these committees has a written charter, which, along with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, are available on our website at http://ir.lendingclub.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.”

The current members of our Audit Committee are Stephen Cutler, Allan Landon (chair), Kathryn Reimann and Erin Selleck. All of the members of our Audit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE. Our Board has determined that Mr. Landon is an Audit Committee financial expert as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE. While other members of our Audit Committee may have the expertise to be designated an audit committee financial expert, the Board made a specific finding only as it relates to Mr. Landon.

In addition, Audit Committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board or any other committee of the board (i) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or (ii) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

All of the members of our Audit Committee are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE.

Our Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting, our internal audit function and the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee receives internal control-related assessments and reviews and discusses our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements with management. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to compliance matters affecting financial reporting, our Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with management, our internal audit department, our independent registered public accounting firm, our internal legal counsel and compliance department to discuss risks related to our financial risk exposures.

During 2024, our Audit Committee held 12 meetings.

The current members of our Compensation Committee are Faiz Ahmad, Allan Landon, Janey Whiteside and Michael Zeisser (chair). All of the members of our Compensation Committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE.

Our Compensation Committee oversees our executive officer and director compensation arrangements, plans, policies and programs, and administers our annual cash bonus program and long-term compensation plans and arrangements for employees generally. Our Compensation Committee also oversees our broader compensation philosophy and approach to human capital. From time to time and as it deems appropriate, our Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees and, with respect to non-executive officer compensation, to our officers.

During 2024, our Compensation Committee held 6 meetings.

The current members of our Credit Risk and Finance Committee are Allan Landon, Timothy Mayopoulos, John C. (Hans) Morris (chair) and Erin Selleck. Our Credit Risk and Finance Committee assists our Board in its oversight of our key risks, including credit, market, interest rate and liquidity risk, as well as the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating such risks. The Credit Risk and Finance Committee assists the Board in monitoring our risk management system, including ensuring that it is commensurate with our size, complexity and risk profile.

During 2024, the Credit Risk and Finance Committee held 4 meetings.

The current members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Faiz Ahmad, John C. (Hans) Morris, Janey Whiteside and Michael Zeisser (chair). All of the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that our Board is properly constituted to meet its statutory, fiduciary and corporate governance oversight. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will advise our Board on corporate governance matters and board performance matters, including making recommendations regarding director nominations and new appointments, the structure and composition of our Board and Board committees and developing, recommending and monitoring compliance with corporate governance guidelines and policies and our business conduct and ethics policy. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also provides primary oversight and review of our progress and disclosures with respect to ESG matters (including climate matters).

During 2024, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 3 meetings.

The current members of our Operational Risk Committee are Faiz Ahmad, Stephen Cutler, Timothy Mayopoulos (chair), Kathryn Reimann and Erin Selleck. Our Operational Risk Committee assists our Board in its oversight of our key risks, including technology and security (including cybersecurity risk), strategic, legal, regulatory (other than related to our financial reporting), compliance and operational risks, as well as the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating such risks.

During 2024, our Operational Risk Committee held 4 meetings.

Our nominees and continuing directors provide a balanced mix of skills and attributes to adeptly oversee our business. Although the Board currently believes that its members have the necessary skills and expertise, the Board regularly monitors the evolution of the Company and the fintech and banking industry, and as part of its refreshment process evaluates its ability to continue to provide necessary skills and experience. The following matrix summarizes certain skills and attributes of our nominees and continuing directors. The matrix is intended to be a high-level summary of what the Board views as key skills and attributes and is not a comprehensive list of each director’s skills or contributions to the Board.

The following graphics summarize certain other attributes of our nominees and continuing directors. The Board believes that an independent Board with balanced mix of age, tenure and background enables a diversity of thought and perspective and therefore allows the Board to provide more comprehensive oversight of the Company and more robust discussions with Company management.

 

For information regarding additional governance measures we have implemented in recent years, please see the section titled “Additional Governance Measures” beginning on page 40.

Our Board adopted a business conduct and ethics policy that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our CEO, CFO and our other executive officers. The full text of the business conduct and ethics policy is posted on the investor relations section of our website at http://ir.lendingclub.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our business conduct and ethics policy, or waivers of provisions contained therein, on our website or in public filings.

None of the members of our Compensation Committee are or have at any time during the past fiscal year been one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serve or in the past fiscal year have served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or our Compensation Committee.

The following table sets forth the names, ages and certain other information for each of the directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (and who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting) and for each of the continuing members of our Board:

Note that under Proposal Four of this Proxy Statement, we are proposing to amend and restate our Eighth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), to provide that any director elected to the Board after the date of the Annual Meeting be elected for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following his or her election.

Stephen Cutler joined our Board in March 2023. Since January 2023, Mr. Cutler has served as Of Counsel at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. From April 2018 to January 2023, Mr. Cutler was a Partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, and previously served as Global Head of the firm’s Government and Internal Investigations Practice. Prior to joining Simpson Thacher, Mr. Cutler was Vice Chairman from 2016 to 2018 and General Counsel from 2007 to 2016 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Earlier in his career, Mr. Cutler served as Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Cutler also serves on the board of The Metropolitan Museum of Art and previously served on the boards of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the National Women’s Law Center. Mr. Cutler received his B.A., summa cum laude, from Yale University and his J.D. from Yale Law School, where he was an editor of the Yale Law Journal. Mr. Cutler brings extensive experience in the banking industry and legal discipline to our Board.

John C. (Hans) Morris joined our Board in February 2013. Mr. Morris is the managing partner of Nyca Partners, a venture capital company focused on fintech established in 2014. From January 2010 until January 2014, he served as a managing director and special advisor at General Atlantic, a growth equity firm. Mr. Morris was previously President of Visa, Inc. from 2007 to 2009. Prior to Visa, Mr. Morris spent 27 years at Citigroup, Inc., a banking and financial services company, and its predecessor companies in various leadership positions, with his final position as Chief Financial Officer and Head of Finance, Technology and Operations for Citi Markets and Banking. Mr. Morris also serves on the board of directors of several privately held companies, and previously served on the boards of directors of Payoneer Global Inc. from 2011 until 2023, AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. from 2015 until 2022, and KCG Holdings, Inc. from 2013 until 2017. Mr. Morris holds a B.A. in government from Dartmouth College. Mr. Morris brings extensive experience with LendingClub and in the banking and financial services industries to our Board.

Erin Selleck joined our Board in February 2021. Prior to her retirement in 2014, Ms. Selleck served as Senior Executive Vice President and Treasurer for MUFG Union Bank, a key subsidiary of Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), one of the world’s largest financial organizations. Her accomplishments at Union Bank include successfully guiding the bank through the 2008 financial crisis, growing the bank’s balance sheet, and navigating an increasingly challenging economic and regulatory environment in the banking industry. Before joining MUFG Union Bank, Ms. Selleck served as Vice President and Manager in Corporate Treasury at Bank of America. Ms. Selleck served on the board of Broadway Financial Corp/Broadway Federal Bank from 2015 until March 2021. Ms. Selleck holds a B.A. in Sociology and an M.B.A. from University of California at Berkeley. Ms. Selleck brings extensive experience in the banking and financial services industries to our Board.

Janey Whiteside joined our Board in April 2023. Since October 2022, Ms. Whiteside has served as a partner of the Consello Group, a financial services advisory and strategic investing platform, and the CEO of Consello’s Growth and Business Development division. Ms. Whiteside has also served as the Chief Growth Officer of Consello since June 2024. Prior to joining Consello, Ms. Whiteside was Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer of Walmart Inc. from August 2018 to March 2022, where she was responsible for the customer journey for both Walmart stores and e-commerce across marketing, creative, PR, product and design, and launched Walmart Connect and Walmart+. From 1997 to July 2018, Ms. Whiteside served at American Express Company in business development, marketing and operating roles in various customer segments, including most recently EVP & GM – Global Premium Products & Benefits and EVP & GM – Global Charge Products, Benefits & Services. Prior to American Express, Ms. Whiteside worked at HSBC Bank from 1993 to 1997. Ms. Whiteside is a member of the Board of Directors of Lyft, Inc. Ms. Whiteside holds an Economics & Management Studies degree (BSc Econ) from Cardiff University. Ms. Whiteside brings extensive experience in the financial services industry and in the marketing, digital and commercial disciplines to our Board.

Faiz Ahmad joined our Board in August 2022. Since February 2025, Mr. Ahmad has served as Chief Executive Officer of Paula’s Choice, LLC, a consumer beauty company and entity of Unilever PLC. From August 2022 to March 2024, Mr. Ahmad served as Chief Commercial Officer of YETI Holdings, Inc. Prior to joining YETI, Mr. Ahmad was CEO, Direct-to-Consumer from June 2020 to July 2022 and Chief Digital Services Officer from September 2019 to June 2020 at Optum, a subsidiary of United Health Group, where he led the creation and go-to-market strategy for Optum’s direct to consumer digital health marketplace for care and pharmacy needs. He also served as Senior Director and Global Head for the Apple Online Store and Apple Retail Market Development for Apple Inc. from February 2015 to August 2019, where he was responsible for the growth strategy, including customer acquisition and affinity programs, for Apple’s retail markets. He also held leadership positions at Delta Airlines, and, in his last role as Managing Director, managed Delta’s digital and customer facing touch points while overseeing the overall digital strategy, global business development, product roadmaps and experience design. Mr. Ahmad received his Master of Business Administration from Emory University and graduated from the Manipal Institute of Technology in India with a Bachelor of Engineering. Mr. Ahmad brings extensive experience in leveraging technology to transform the customer experience for consumer brands to our Board.

Allan Landon joined our Board in February 2021. Since June 2011, Mr. Landon has served in various capacities at the University of Utah, including Innovation Advisor, Assistant Dean and Adjunct Professor at the David Eccles School of Business. His teachings cover business leadership and banking courses and help develop experiential learning programs. He also directs the Utah Center for Financial Services. From July 2011 to July 2018, Mr. Landon was Operating Partner at Community BanCapital and CBC Management GP, an Investment Management company. From 2004 to 2010, Mr. Landon served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Bank of Hawaii. Before joining Bank of Hawaii, Mr. Landon was the Chief Financial Officer of First American Bank. Earlier Mr. Landon was a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and partner with Ernst & Young, serving public and privately-owned community, regional banks and other financial institutions. Mr. Landon is a member of the Board of Directors of Electronic Caregiver, Inc., and previously served on the Board of Directors of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance and Whistic, Inc. Mr. Landon holds a B.S. from Iowa State University. Mr. Landon brings extensive experience in the banking and financial services industries to our Board.

Timothy J. Mayopoulos joined our Board in August 2016. Since October 2023, Mr. Mayopoulos has served as CEO of Power Forward Communities, a nonprofit dedicated to decarbonizing American homes. During March 2023, Mr. Mayopoulos served as President and CEO of Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. From January 2019 to March 2023, Mr. Mayopoulos served as President of Blend Labs, Inc., a publicly traded enterprise software company making consumer lending simpler, faster and safer. From 2012 to 2018, Mr. Mayopoulos served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Fannie Mae, one of the largest providers of mortgage credit in the United States. Mr. Mayopoulos joined Fannie Mae in 2009 in the wake of the financial crisis. He initially served as Fannie Mae’s General Counsel, and in 2010 was named Chief Administrative Officer. He was promoted to CEO in June 2012, and, in that role, led the company’s support of the U.S. housing market and its efforts to create a better housing finance system for the future. Before joining Fannie Mae, Mr. Mayopoulos was General Counsel of Bank of America, held senior management positions at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Credit Suisse First Boston and Deutsche Bank, and practiced law at Davis Polk & Wardwell. Mr. Mayopoulos is a member of the Boards of Directors of Blend Labs, Inc., Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and several privately held companies. He is a graduate of Cornell University and New York University School of Law. Mr. Mayopoulos brings extensive experience in the banking and financial services industries and legal and regulatory disciplines to our Board.

Kathryn Reimann joined our Board in August 2022. Since September 2023, Ms. Reimann has served as a lecturer at University of Miami Law School on ethics and compliance topics. Further, since September 2021, Ms. Reimann has served as a Senior Advisor at Oliver Wyman specializing in regulatory compliance and risk management, regulatory policy, governance and ethics matters. Ms. Reimann has also provided compliance advisory expertise and services as the principal of Lyncroft Compliance LLC since February 2021. She has also served as an Adjunct Professor and Senior Fellow in the Program on Corporate Compliance & Enforcement at New York University School of Law since December 2019 and a regulatory advisor to Hummingbird Regtech since January 2020. She

previously served as a Senior Managing Director of Treliant from August 2018 to October 2019 and as Chief Compliance Officer and Managing Director for Citibank NA and Citi’s Global Consumer Banking business from August 2006 to July 2018. Earlier, she served as Global Compliance Head and Managing Counsel of American Express and as Chief Compliance Officer at Lehman Brothers. She was elected to the American Law Institute in 2016 and serves as an advisor on their compliance principles project. She holds an A.B. from Princeton University’s School of Public and International Affairs and a J.D. from New York University School of Law. Ms. Reimann brings extensive experience in consumer financial regulation, bank governance and compliance risk management to our Board.

Scott Sanborn has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board since June 2016. Mr. Sanborn previously served as our President from April 2016 to May 2017, Chief Operating and Marketing Officer from April 2013 to March 2016 and Chief Marketing Officer from May 2010 to March 2013. From November 2008 to February 2010, Mr. Sanborn served as the Chief Marketing and Revenue Officer for eHealthInsurance, an e-commerce company. Mr. Sanborn holds a B.A. from Tufts University. Mr. Sanborn has significant executive and leadership experience and has been a driver of our strategy and growth for nearly 10 years and instrumental in transforming the Company from a small privately held company to a publicly traded company and industry leader. Mr. Sanborn brings the perspective as our Chief Executive Officer and extensive experience with LendingClub and the fintech industry to our Board.

Michael Zeisser joined our Board in September 2019. Mr. Zeisser currently serves as the Managing Partner of FMZ Ventures, a growth equity investment fund focused on experienced economy and marketplace ecosystems. From 2013 to April 2018, Mr. Zeisser served as Chairman, U.S. Investments for Alibaba Group and led Alibaba’s strategic investments outside of Asia. From 2003 to 2013, Mr. Zeisser served as Senior Vice President of Liberty Media Corporation, where he led investments in digital media, online gaming, and commerce. Prior to joining Liberty Media, Mr. Zeisser was a partner at McKinsey & Company. Mr. Zeisser also serves on the board of directors of several privately held companies. Previously, Mr. Zeisser served on the board of directors of Global Technology Acquisition Corp. from October 2021 to April 2024 and on the board of directors of Shutterfly, Trip Advisor, IAC, TIME Inc. and XO Group. Mr. Zeisser graduated from the University of Strasbourg, France and the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. Mr. Zeisser brings extensive experience in corporate development, strategy and consumer marketplaces to our Board.

In its evaluation of director candidates, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the current size and composition of our Board and the needs of our Board and the respective committees of our Board. Some of the qualifications that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers include business experience, diversity characteristics (including gender, race and ethnic background) and the skills set forth in the director skills matrix beginning on page 16.

Exceptional candidates who do not meet all of the above criteria may still be considered. Director candidates must have sufficient time available in the judgment of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to perform all board of director and committee responsibilities. Members of our Board are expected to prepare for, attend, and participate in all board of director and applicable committee meetings. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem, from time to time, are in our stockholders’ best interests.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, it considers diversity characteristics in identifying director nominees, including diversity in the perspective, experience, background and skills that contribute to the Board’s performance of its responsibilities in the oversight of our Company. Additionally, in its efforts to recruit members of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will specifically direct any individuals or search firms assisting with recruitment to seek out potential candidates with diversity characteristics, to ensure that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has considered a full array of qualified candidates. In making determinations regarding

nominations of directors, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers these and other factors as it oversees the annual board of director and committee evaluations. After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends to our full Board the director nominees for election.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees. Candidates may come to its attention through current members of our Board, professional search firms (which locate qualified candidates that meet the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s criteria), stockholders or other persons. The Board does not distinguish between nominees recommended by stockholders and other nominees. However, stockholders desiring to nominate a director candidate at the Annual Meeting must comply with certain procedures. A stockholder of record can nominate a candidate for election to the Board by complying with the procedures in Article I, Section 1.11 of our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”). Any eligible stockholder who wishes to submit a nomination should review the requirements in the Bylaws on nominations by stockholders. Any nomination should be sent in writing to the Secretary, LendingClub Corporation, 595 Market Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94105. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, complete biographical information, a description of the proposed nominee’s qualifications as a director, other information specified in our Bylaws and a representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record holder of our stock. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected, along with an irrevocable resignation, contingent (i) on that nominee not receiving the required vote for election, and (ii) acceptance of that resignation by the Board in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the Board for such purposes. All candidates are evaluated under the same process which is conducted by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year. Stockholders otherwise may recommend persons for the Board to consider for nomination. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination or recommendation of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

All proposals of stockholders (including nominations but excluding proposals under SEC Rule 14a-8) that are intended to be presented by such stockholder at an annual meeting of stockholders must be in writing and notice must be delivered to the Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on the 75th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 105th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. For stockholder proposals under SEC Rule 14a-8, see “QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND THE ANNUAL MEETING – 17. How can I make proposals or nominate a director at next year’s annual meeting?”.

Our non-employee director compensation program is described below. In addition, we reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending our board and committee meetings. Employee directors are not eligible to receive additional compensation for their service as directors. Accordingly, Mr. Sanborn, our Chief Executive Officer, received no additional compensation in 2024 for his service as a director. Our non-employee directors do not receive perquisites.

Under our non-employee director compensation program, each new non-employee member of our Board receives an equity award of RSUs in connection with his or her initial election or appointment to our Board having a grant date fair value equal to $200,000 multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is 365 minus the number of days that have elapsed between the date of our most recently completed annual meeting of stockholders and the date the non-employee director becomes a member of our Board, and the denominator of which is 365 (the “Initial Director Award”).

To satisfy stock ownership requirements set forth by the federal banking regulations, the Initial Director Award shall have a grant date fair value equal to at least $1,000 and $1,000 of the Initial Director Award will vest immediately.

The remainder of the Initial Director Award, if any, will vest on the one-year anniversary of our most recently completed annual meeting of stockholders. For example, a non-employee director that joins our Board mid-way through the one-year anniversary of our most recently completed annual meeting of stockholders would receive an Initial Director Award having a grant date fair value equal to $100,000 with $1,000 vesting immediately and the remainder vesting on the one-year anniversary of our most recently completed annual meeting of stockholders.

Each continuing non-employee member of our Board receives on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders an equity award of RSUs having a grant date fair value of $200,000 that vests quarterly over one year. The number of RSUs granted to non-employee directors is determined by dividing the intended target value of the equity award by our stock price on the date of grant.

Each non-employee director receives the applicable annual cash retainers listed below based on their board and committee service. Committee chairpersons do not receive the committee member retainer in addition to the chairperson retainer. Our non-executive Board chairperson does receive both the cash retainer as a non-employee director and the cash retainer as non-executive Board chairperson.

Cash retainers are generally paid semi-annually after services are rendered instead of paid in advance. Specifically, non-employee directors typically receive a cash payment in June for services performed from January to June and a cash payment in December for services performed from July to December.

Each member of our Board and committee of our Board also concurrently serves as a director of our banking subsidiary, LendingClub Bank (the “Bank Board”) and in a corresponding capacity on the corresponding committee, if any, of the Bank Board. Accordingly, by way of example only, a member of our Board who serves as a member of the Audit Committee of our Board and the chair of the Operational Risk Committee of our Board, then also concurrently serves as a member of the Bank Board, a member of the Audit Committee of the Bank Board and the chair of the Operational Risk Committee of the Bank Board (such concurrent service, “Concurrent Service”). Our non-employee directors do not receive any additional compensation for Concurrent Service on the Bank Board.

Our non-employee director compensation program provides a per meeting cash retainer in the amounts described below, subject to a maximum calendar year payment of $25,000, for non-employee directors who serve on a committee of the Bank Board that meets at least three times in the then current calendar year and for which there is no corresponding Board committee (such Bank Board committee, a “Bank Only Committee”).

By way of example only, a Bank Only Committee could include a committee responsible for providing oversight of mergers and acquisitions, legal and regulatory compliance, capital management or a Community Reinvestment Act program. In 2024, there was a single Bank Only Committee that held 12 meetings (the “2024 Bank Only Committee”). Ms. Selleck served as chair of the 2024 Bank Only Committee and each of Ms. Reimann and Messrs. Landon and Mayopoulos served as members for all of 2024.

Our director stock ownership guidelines provide that each non-employee director hold equity (vested shares and/or shares underlying RSU awards) equal to at least $400,000 in value, or ten times the current base cash retainer for non-employee director service, within three years from the date of appointment or election to our Board. Compliance with these guidelines will be considered by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when making recommendations to the Board regarding whether to nominate directors for re-election.

All of our non-employee director nominees and continuing non-employee directors are in compliance with this policy, and either meet the suggested ownership levels currently or have additional time to accumulate equity to meet the ownership levels.

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation paid or awarded in 2024 to each of our non-employee directors who served during 2024. Mr. Sanborn received no compensation for his 2024 service on our Board because he was an employee director.

The following table sets forth the aggregate number of options and stock awards held as of December 31, 2024, by each individual who served as a non-employee director during 2024. All stock awards held by non-employee directors are in the form of RSU awards.

The following table identifies certain information about our current executive officers. Each executive officer serves at the discretion of our Board and holds office until his or her successor is duly appointed or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

For biographical information regarding Mr. Sanborn, please refer to the section titled “Information Regarding Our Directors” above.

Andrew LaBenne has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2022. From July 2022 to September 2022, Mr. LaBenne served as our Executive Vice President, Finance. From April 2021 to May 2022, Mr. LaBenne served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (formerly Bakkt Holdings, LLC) and was responsible for all finance, investor relations and enterprise risk functions. From April 2015 to April 2021, Mr. LaBenne was Chief Financial Officer of Amalgamated Financial Corp. From August 2013 until April 2015, Mr. LaBenne was Chief Financial Officer of Business Banking for JPMorgan Chase & Co. Earlier Mr. LaBenne spent 17 years at Capital One Financial in various roles, including as the CFO of Retail Banking and CFO of Commercial Banking. Mr. LaBenne holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from the University of Virginia.

Annie Armstrong has served as our Chief Risk Officer since March 2020. From September 2018 to March 2020, Ms. Armstrong served as Global Head of Financial Risk at Uber Technologies, Inc. From October 2007 to September 2018, Ms. Armstrong served in various capacities at KPMG, including as Partner, FinTech Practice Leader from September 2015 to September 2018. Ms. Armstrong holds a B.S. degree in Integrated Science and Technology from James Madison University.

Jordan Cheng has served as our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2023. From May 2020 to October 2023, Mr. Cheng served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of LendingClub Bank, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Mr. Cheng previously served as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary of Comenity Bank and Comenity Capital Bank, subsidiaries of Alliance Data Systems Corporation, from July 2018 to May 2020, and in various leadership roles, most recently as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Alliance Data Systems Corporation from August 2013 to July 2018. Prior to Alliance Data, Mr. Cheng served in various leadership and in-house legal positions at Franklin Capital Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank and U.S. Bank from June 2002 to August 2013. Mr. Cheng holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Utah and a J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law.

This section describes our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design, our compensation-setting process, our executive compensation components and the decisions made in 2024 for our named executive officers (“NEOs”), who were the following during 2024:

The compensation provided to our NEOs for 2024 is set forth in detail in the Summary Compensation Table and other tables and the accompanying footnotes, and the narrative in this section.

To successfully execute on our strategy and continue our mission to improve the financial health of millions of Americans, we must hire and retain a highly talented team of professionals with deep experience in technology and financial services to build new products, engage our members, and manage and grow our business. We also expect our executive team to possess and demonstrate exceptional leadership, innovative thinking and prudent risk management. Because we operate in a highly competitive and dynamic market for talent, our compensation program must be designed to reward and retain our top talent.

Central to our compensation philosophy is incentivizing and rewarding the achievement of strategic and financial goals of the Company and correlating compensation to stockholder returns over the longer term. To that end, we believe that competitive compensation packages should include a combination of base salaries, annual cash bonus opportunities and long-term awards that are earned over a multi-year period. We approach the design and implementation of our executive compensation program with emphasis on the following principles:

Our Board believes it is important to maintain an open dialogue with stockholders to understand their views on the Company, its strategy and its governance and compensation practices. Therefore, we engage with stockholders regularly and solicit feedback annually on our compensation and governance practices. Members of our management team participate in these conversations, and stockholders are also offered the opportunity to speak with a member of our Board.

In recent discussions with stockholders, certain stockholders inquired about the cadence of the Company’s review of its ESG disclosures and supported the Company’s commitment to incrementally evolve its ESG disclosures.

Some stockholders also encouraged the Company to diversify the PBRSU program to include an ambitious, but attainable, multi-year operating metric to supplement the relative TSR metric. Further, stockholders recognized that executive retention is critical as the Company navigates the current macroeconomic environment and resumes growth.

Finally, we shared the substantial measures we had already taken to manage dilution created by the Company’s equity compensation program and our target to reduce the overhang and annual utilization rate from our equity compensation program to below 20% and 4%, respectively, by the end of 2027. Stockholders were nearly universally supportive of our efforts and initiatives, including allocating a greater portion of target compensation to cash compensation in lieu of equity compensation to reach our stated dilution targets.

Below is a summary of compensation and governance enhancements we have made since 2017 in response to stockholder feedback.

We believe that our compensation approach supports our objective of rewarding performance and increasing retention, reflecting an opportunity for financial upside when performance and retention objectives are met. In particular, our use of equity awards provides a direct link between stockholder interests and the compensation of our NEOs, thereby motivating and incentivizing our NEOs to focus on increasing our market capitalization over the long term. Conversely, our compensation approach reduces payouts when performance or retention objectives are not met.

For example, our PBRSUs granted in 2021 and 2022 to our NEOs were entirely relative TSR based and none of the shares subject to these awards were earned as stock price performance over the applicable 3-year performance periods was insufficient to warrant a payout. The lack of any payout for the 2021 and 2022 PBRSU awards resulted in our CEO forfeiting awards that had a target grant date fair value of $6.29 million.

Back-to-back years of 0% payouts on PBRSU awards due to insufficient stock price performance

reflects strong pay-for-performance alignment ($6.29 million in target compensation forfeited by CEO)

The below graphic shows the composition of our CEO’s and the average of our other NEOs’ target compensation in 2024 (using the target grant date fair value of cash and equity awards) as well as the percentages that are considered at-risk or long-term compensation, demonstrating strong alignment in our compensation structure between pay and performance/retention.

2024 Total Target Compensation

 

Role of Our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee oversees all aspects of our compensation program for executive officers, including base salaries, annual cash bonus opportunities and payouts, and long-term award opportunities and payouts (including the size, design and achievement of performance objectives, where applicable). Our Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation programs at least annually and more frequently if circumstances warrant. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for determining the compensation for our CEO and making recommendations to the Board regarding non-employee director compensation. The Compensation Committee retains and is supported by FW Cook, an independent compensation consultancy. During 2024, our Compensation Committee held 6 meetings.

Role of Compensation Consultant. During 2024, FW Cook advised the Compensation Committee on the compensation policies and market practices among publicly-traded companies, including the size, prevalence and structure of supplemental awards. Other than the forgoing, FW Cook did not provide any services to us. In December 2024, the Compensation Committee assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent FW Cook from independently advising the Compensation Committee.

Role of Management. The Compensation Committee looks to our CEO to make preliminary recommendations regarding compensation for our executive officers other than himself because of his daily involvement with our executive team. As to the CEO, the Compensation Committee works closely with its independent compensation consultant, our Chief People Officer and our legal department to gather data on competitive market practices and to evaluate potential modifications to our compensation program. No executive officer participates directly in the final deliberations or determinations regarding his or her own compensation package.

Compensation Governance. Our Compensation Committee seeks to ensure sound executive compensation practices to adhere to our pay-for-performance philosophy while appropriately managing risk, supporting retention and aligning our compensation with the creation of long-term value for our stockholders. During 2024, our Compensation Committee:

The Compensation Committee seeks to compensate our executive officers at a level that allows us to successfully retain the best possible talent to manage and grow our business, and drive productivity and efficiency. In setting executive compensation, the Compensation Committee periodically assesses how compensation for our executive officers compares against executives in similar positions at a group of peer companies. In making 2024 compensation decisions the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation data from the 2022 peer group, which was the peer group that was in effect at such time.

In addition to considering compensation data in making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee also considers the criticality and scope of responsibility of each executive officer, our current practice of maintaining appropriate differentiation in target compensation among our executive officers, as well as the CEO’s and Compensation Committee’s assessment of each executive officer’s performance and impact on the organization.

The Compensation Committee believes that the level of target compensation provided to our NEOs is appropriate to attract and retain the exceptional talent required to lead the Company, especially as a regulated banking institution and in the highly competitive San Francisco Bay Area labor market.

The Compensation Committee typically conducts a full review of our peer group every other year. A full review occurred in 2022 and therefore was scheduled to occur again in 2024. Accordingly, in early Fall 2024, the Compensation Committee conducted a full review of our peer group and selected the following companies to constitute the Company’s executive compensation peer group:

The Compensation Committee continues to focus on companies in the banking and fintech sectors. The Compensation Committee considered public companies, with particular attention to several fintech companies that recently became publicly traded, whose business is based in the United States and whose shares are listed on a national securities exchange in the United States, because compensation practices vary widely internationally. Further, the Compensation Committee considered the assets, revenue, revenue growth, net income and market capitalization of these companies, with a focus on companies with significant operations in the San Francisco Bay Area to reflect local conditions and demand for talent. The Compensation Committee also considered the comparability of our business model, employee count and operational complexity. In its final selection, our Compensation Committee believed it appropriate to select peer companies with financial metrics both above and below our own, with the Company placing between the 25th and 75th percentiles, at the time of selection, on the metrics considered.

 

As reflected above, when reviewing and updating the peer group in 2024, the Compensation Committee removed two companies that are no longer publicly traded and expanded our peer group by adding two consumer-focused online-oriented banks and two public companies in the fintech industry. Accordingly, our 2024 peer group carried forward 16 companies from the 2022 peer group and added 4 new companies. Of the 20 companies comprising the 2024 peer group, 12 (or 60% of the peer group) are fintech and non-bank financial companies and 8 (or 40% of the peer group) are banks. This updated peer group retains consistency with the prior version while, we believe, continuing to appropriately reflect our business model, our operating and regulatory environment and the companies with whom we compete for talent.

At our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, we held a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote. Approximately 99% of the votes cast by stockholders, excluding abstentions and broker non-votes, were voted in favor of our say-on-pay proposal. Our Compensation Committee is appreciative of the 2024 say-on-pay vote outcome, and considers the results of the say-on-pay votes as well as any other feedback from stockholders in structuring our executive compensation program and making compensation decisions. In particular, as discussed in the section entitled “Stockholder Engagement & Feedback” above on page 27, we periodically solicit feedback from stockholders to, among other things, understand their perspectives on our current executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of future say-on-pay votes as we evolve our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design.

Elements of Executive Compensation. Our 2024 NEO compensation packages include three primary elements:

We believe that our compensation mix supports our objective of focusing on “at-risk” compensation having significant financial upside based on both Company and individual performance and/or “long-term” compensation earned over a multi-year period. We expect to continue to utilize equity awards because of the direct link that equity compensation provides between stockholder interests and the interests of our executive officers, thereby motivating our executive officers to focus on increasing value over the long term. For executives, we expect compensation to remain largely performance based with a majority of target compensation tied to long-term awards that encourage sustained performance and support retention.

Base Salary. While we believe that compensation for the executive team should be weighted towards long-term compensation, we believe that acceptable base salaries are a necessary element of overall compensation in order to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers.

The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries on at least an annual basis and may adjust them from time to time, if needed, to reflect changes in market conditions, or other factors.

We typically use annual cash bonuses to reward our executive officers, including NEOs, for achievement against annual financial goals. In 2024, the interest rate and broader macroeconomic environment continued to remain dynamic and uncertain, thereby making it challenging to identify full-year goals that appropriately captured skillful management execution instead of the impact of external factors such as changes in interest rates. Further, we did

not issue annual guidance in 2024 and therefore could not leverage guidance for establishing annual targets. Accordingly, in 2024 the Compensation Committee determined to continue the 2023 design of bifurcating the Company-wide annual cash bonus program into two halves (i.e., H1 2024 and H2 2024) to allow for goal setting that more precisely reflects management performance.

For 2024, the Compensation Committee further determined to use Pre-Provision Net Revenue (“PPNR”) as the primary quantitative performance metric to determine annual cash bonus funding, with performance against the PPNR metric determining funding of up to 125% of target annual cash bonus funding. Performance of PPNR for each half of 2024 was calculated individually and plotted against the payout curve to determine the payout for the half, and then performance for each half was added together to arrive at annual cash bonus bonus funding with respect to PPNR performance. The Compensation Committee further determined to use Total Net Revenue (“Total Revenue”) as the secondary quantitative performance metric to determine bonus funding, with performance in the second half of 2024 against the Total Revenue metric determining funding an additional, all or nothing, 10% of target annual cash bonus funding. Target levels of performance for H1 2024 were established in February 2024 and target levels of performance for H2 2024 were established in June 2024.

Finally, the Compensation Committee determined to include an automatic adjustment mechanism to the H1 2024 and H2 2024 portions of the 2024 annual cash bonus program that automatically reduces bonus funding for the half in the event GAAP Net Income for either quarter comprising the half is negative (the “Net Income Shortfall Adjustment”). The Net Income Shortfall Adjustment was deemed prudent by the Compensation Committee to ensure that funding of the annual cash bonus program would not compromise the Company’s stated expectation of remaining profitable on a quarterly basis throughout 2024.

The funding of the annual cash bonus program was based on the achievement of performance metrics and application of the Net Income Shortfall Adjustment, with the Compensation Committee retaining discretion to adjust total funding either above or below the otherwise pre-established payout curve detailed below.

Our Compensation Committee believed that the achievement of the performance metrics would require excellent leadership, effective management and a clear focus on driving and achieving results in a dynamic environment. The following table details the actual funding of the annual cash bonus program. In 2024, actual PPNR for H1 2024 and H2 2024 was in excess of maximum performance and actual Total Revenue was in excess of target performance. Further, the Company remained profitable after accrual/funding of the bonus pool for each quarter in 2024, and therefore there was no Net Income Shortfall Adjustment. Accordingly, actual performance during 2024 supported funding the annual cash bonus program at 135% of target; which represents the program’s maximum funding level.

Despite actual performance exceeding the maximum performance tiers, the Compensation Committee did not subsequently exercise any discretion in funding the 2024 annual cash bonus program and approved funding the program at 135% of target. As described below, all individual payments under the annual cash bonus program are discretionary and reflect individual achievement during the year, and therefore may be different than the 135% total funding level. The table below further details the funding of our 2024 annual cash bonus program.

2024 Annual Cash Bonus Program - Achievement Table

Individual Performance Measures. We expect a high level of performance from each of our executive officers in carrying out his or her respective responsibilities and each executive officer is evaluated based on his or her overall performance. Our CEO evaluates each executive officer’s individual performance (other than his own) and compensation level and, for purposes of determining annual cash bonus payouts, makes a recommendation to our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee ultimately determines the individual performance for all NEOs. The impact of individual performance on an individual NEO’s bonus amount can modify the amount otherwise payable based on actual corporate achievement. The maximum upward discretionary adjustment is 50% for a total of 150% of the target bonus opportunity amount; however, there is no limitation on the downward discretionary adjustment (i.e., the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to pay an individual NEO zero bonus regardless of corporate achievement).

Based on performance against the pre-approved financial metrics described above and in recognition of their significant individual contributions in furthering the Company’s performance and strategy, all of our continuing NEOs received a payment under the annual cash bonus plan at the actual corporate funding level of 135% (i.e., the Compensation Committee did not apply any discretion (upwards or downwards) on the individual bonus payments to our NEOs based on their individual performance).

The following table sets forth the 2024 annual cash bonuses paid in the first quarter of 2025 to each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Momen who did not receive a 2024 annual cash bonus due to the timing of his separation:

The Compensation Committee reviews bonus targets under the annual cash bonus program on an annual basis and may adjust them from time to time to reflect changes in market conditions, or other factors.

Typically, long-term awards comprise the single biggest component of target total direct compensation for our NEOs. This approach aligns our executive team with our stockholders’ long-term interests, attracts executives of the highest caliber and retains them for the long term. In granting annual long-term awards, the Compensation Committee considers, among other things, the executive officer’s base compensation and bonus opportunity, the need to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term stockholder value, our financial results, market conditions and an evaluation of the expected and actual responsibilities and performance.

Based on the results of our internal research and guidance from FW Cook with respect to the practices of our peer group, the recommendations of Mr. Sanborn (who did not participate in approval discussions regarding his own compensation) and the individual performance of each of the NEOs, the Compensation Committee granted long-term awards in Q1 2024 to each of our NEOs as part of our Company-wide annual long-term award program.

In 2024, we adopted a program whereby all long-term awards, including those granted to our NEOs, are bifurcated into an equity portion (e.g., PBRSU and/or RSU) and a fixed value cash-based portion (“Cash Award”). The Cash Award vests over 3 years, like the equity portion. This program was implemented in response to stockholder feedback to reduce the dilution from our equity programs. Specifically, it permits for decreased equity utilization, while keeping target compensation levels intact and providing the Company another multi-year retention feature in its compensation program. We believe this program was the best available solution to balance reducing dilution, rewarding and retaining employees, and managing compensation expense.

The aggregate intended target value of the 2024 refresh long-term awards granted to NEOs were allocated as follows: (i) 25% in the form of a Cash Award and (ii) 75% in the form of equity awards (i.e., RSUs and PBRSUs), with allocation between RSU and PBRSU being 45/55 for our CEO and 30/70 for our other NEOs.

In 2024, all Company employees that were granted RSUs were provided with an intended target value of the RSU award and the number of RSUs subject to the award was determined by dividing the intended target value of the RSU award by our trailing 30-day average stock price ending on the date preceding the date of grant.

On March 21, 2024, the Compensation Committee granted 157,809 RSUs to Mr. Sanborn, 147,289 RSUs to Mr. LaBenne, 106,375 RSUs to Ms. Armstrong, 68,735 RSUs to Mr. Cheng and 147,289 RSUs to Mr. Momen, reflecting intended target values of $1,265,625, $1,181,250, $853,125, $551,250 and $1,181,250, respectively. These RSUs vest over three years, with 1/12th of the RSUs vesting in quarterly installments starting on May 25, 2024, subject to continued service.

In 2024, all Company employees that were granted PBRSUs were provided with an intended target value of the PBRSU award and the number of target PBRSUs subject to the award was determined by dividing the intended target value of the PBRSU award by the per unit grant date fair value.

On March 21, 2024, the Compensation Committee granted 179,980 target PBRSUs to Mr. Sanborn, 58,903 target PBRSUs to Mr. LaBenne, 42,541 target PBRSUs to Ms. Armstrong, 27,488 target PBRSUs to Mr. Cheng and 58,903 target PBRSUs to Mr. Momen, reflecting intended target values of $1,546,875, $506,250, $365,625, $236,250 and $506,250, respectively.

These awards are structured so that the PBRSUs become earned only to the extent that pre-established performance targets are met over the three-year performance period. For 2024, the Compensation Committee diversified the PBRSU program by introducing an ambitious, but attainable, multi-year operating metric. This change

is in response to feedback from certain stockholders who expressed a preference for us to evolve our PBRSU program to include an operating metric that is reflective of skillful multi-year execution by management, rather than solely relying upon TSR performance which can be disproportionately influenced by macroeconomic factors.

With respect to the operating metric portion of the 2024 PBRSUs, the Compensation Committee determined to use cumulative Adjusted Net Income over the three-year performance period. Adjusted Net Income, for purposes of the 2024 PBRSUs, is defined as the Company’s Net Income (loss), as adjusted to exclude the financial impact of: (i) income tax expense (benefit), (ii) the initial application of the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) accounting methodology (e.g., Day 1 CECL) and (iii) other financial impacts that the Compensation Committee determines are non-recurring and do not contribute directly to evaluating the impact of management’s performance on the Company’s financial results. The Company believes that this metric appropriately measures management’s stewardship over the Company’s profitability over a multi-year period by removing the influence of certain accounting and tax mechanics that can meaningfully adjust our GAAP net income in a manner that is not reflective of management execution.

With respect to the TSR portion of the 2024 PBRSUs, the Compensation Committee determined to compare how our cumulative TSR over the three-year performance period ranks relative to the cumulative TSR of each of the companies below (the “2024 TSR Basket Companies”):