UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.            )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

WALKER & DUNLOP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

​

WALKER & DUNLOP, INC.

7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on May 1, 2025

10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 1, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, at

Hilton Garden Inn

7301 Waverly Street

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

for the following purposes:

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 7, 2025 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY PRIOR TO THE MEETING BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOTING ACCOMPANYING THE NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS OR, IF YOU REQUESTED PRINTED COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIALS, YOUR PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON, IF YOU DESIRE, AS DISCUSSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

​

Bethesda, Maryland
March 14, 2025

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 1, 2025:

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available free of charge at http://www.edocumentview.com/WD.

​

​

Table of Contents

​

​

​

​

WALKER & DUNLOP, INC.

7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

PROXY STATEMENT

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Why is this proxy statement being made available?

We have made this proxy statement available to you because you own shares of common stock of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. This proxy statement contains information related to the solicitation of proxies for use at our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders, to be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 1, 2025 at the Hilton Garden Inn, 7301 Waverly Street, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, for the purposes stated in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This solicitation is made by Walker & Dunlop, Inc. on behalf of our Board of Directors. Unless otherwise stated, as used in this proxy statement, the terms “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to Walker & Dunlop, Inc. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) is first being mailed to stockholders beginning on or about March 21, 2025.

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability in the mail instead of a printed set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we are permitted to furnish our proxy materials over the internet to our stockholders by delivering a Notice of Internet Availability in the mail. The Notice of Internet Availability instructs you on how to access and review the proxy statement and 2024 Annual Report to Stockholders over the internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the internet. We believe that this e-proxy process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, while also lowering our costs and reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting.

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability in the mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting these materials provided in the Notice of Internet Availability.

What information is presented in this proxy statement?

The information contained in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting of stockholders, the voting process, information about our Board of Directors and Board committees, the compensation of our directors and our executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and other required information.

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

Only holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 7, 2025, the record date for the annual meeting of stockholders, are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the annual meeting. Our common stock constitutes the only class of securities entitled to vote at the meeting.

When you vote by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability or, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, your proxy or voting instruction card, you appoint Daniel J. Groman and William M. Walker as your representatives to vote your shares of common stock at the annual meeting. Messrs. Groman and Walker, or either of them, will vote your shares of common stock as you instruct. Accordingly, your shares of common stock will be voted whether or not you attend the annual meeting. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to vote by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability or, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, your proxy or voting instruction card, in advance.

Who can attend the annual meeting?

If you are a holder of our common stock at the close of business on March 7, 2025, the record date for the annual meeting, or a duly appointed proxy, you are authorized to attend the annual meeting. You will need to present proof of stock ownership and valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted. If your common stock is held beneficially in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record (i.e., street name), you must present the proxy card or proof of your ownership by presenting a bank or brokerage account statement reflecting your ownership as of the record date.

Cameras, recording equipment and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the annual meeting. For directions to the annual meeting of stockholders, contact Investor Relations at (301) 202-3207.

What will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting?

The presence at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the common stock outstanding on March 7, 2025 will constitute a quorum, permitting the stockholders to conduct business at the annual meeting. We will include abstentions and broker non-votes in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the annual meeting, including for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting.

What are the voting rights of stockholders?

As of March 7, 2025, there were 33,968,158 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date entitles its holder to cast one vote on each matter to be voted on.

How do I vote?

If you hold your shares of common stock directly (i.e., not in a bank or brokerage account), you may vote by attending the meeting and voting in person or you may provide your proxy via the internet, telephone or mail in accordance with the instructions provided on the Notice of Internet Availability or, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, your proxy or voting instruction card.

If your shares of common stock are held in street name, you should follow the voting instructions provided to you by your broker or nominee. You may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your broker or nominee or, in most cases, submit voting instructions by the internet or by telephone to your broker or nominee. If you provide specific instructions, your broker or nominee will vote your shares of common stock as directed. Additionally, if you want to vote in person and hold your shares in street name, you will need a “legal proxy” from your broker to vote at the annual meeting. Contact your broker or nominee for specific information on how to obtain a legal proxy in order to attend and vote your shares at the meeting.

What is a “broker non-vote”?

A broker non-vote occurs when shares held through a broker are voted on certain proposals but are not voted on other proposals because the broker (i) has not received voting instructions from the stockholder who beneficially owns the shares and (ii) lacks the authority to vote the shares at the broker’s discretion on such proposals. Under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, the election of directors (Proposal 1) and the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal 3) are considered to be non-routine matters, and brokers will lack the authority to vote uninstructed shares at their discretion on such proposals. However, the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2) is a routine matter, so brokers may vote uninstructed shares at their discretion on Proposal 2. Accordingly, we do not expect any broker non-votes for Proposal 2.

How are votes counted?

If your vote is made in accordance with the instructions in the Notice of Availability or, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, your proxy or voting instruction card, and your vote is not revoked, the persons designated as proxy holders will vote the shares of common stock represented by that proxy as directed by you. If you return a

signed proxy card but fail to indicate your voting preferences, the persons designated as proxy holders will vote the shares of common stock represented by that proxy as recommended by the Board. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for our Board of Directors named in this proxy statement (Proposal 1); “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year (Proposal 2) and “FOR” the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal 3).

In the election of directors (Proposal 1), you may either vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each of the nominees, and for Proposals 2 and 3, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each proposal. For each of Proposals 1, 2 and 3, abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not count as votes cast for a proposal and will have no effect on the result of the vote on any proposal.

Will my shares of common stock be voted if I do not provide my proxy and I do not attend the annual meeting?

If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors (Proposal 1) and the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3). Under applicable rules, the bank or broker that holds your shares does not have the ability to vote your uninstructed shares on Proposals 1 or 3 on a discretionary basis. Thus, if you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your bank or broker how to vote on Proposals 1 or 3, votes will not be cast on your behalf. Your bank or broker will, however, have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2). If you are a stockholder of record and you do not cast your vote, votes will not be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the annual meeting.

May I change my vote?

Yes. You may change or revoke a previously granted proxy at any time before it is exercised by either (i) submitting a later-dated proxy, (ii) delivering a written request to our Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 that revokes your previously granted proxy or (iii) attending the annual meeting and voting in person. Please note that attendance at the annual meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute revocation of a previously granted proxy.

If your shares of common stock are held in street name, then you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker or nominee. You may also vote in person at the annual meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker as described above. Please note that attendance at the annual meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute revocation of a previously granted proxy.

How many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals?

A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board of Directors (Proposal 1) if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast. If a nominee who is an incumbent director does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast, the director shall offer his or her resignation to the Board of Directors, and the Board will consider whether to accept or reject the director’s offer to resign. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on Proposal 1.

Ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2) and the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal 3) will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not count as votes cast for a proposal and will have no effect on the result of the vote on Proposals 2 and 3.

Will any other matters be voted on?

As of the date of this proxy statement, we do not know of any matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than those matters discussed in this proxy statement. If any other matters properly come before the annual meeting and call for a stockholder vote, valid proxies will be voted by the holders of the proxies in accordance with the recommendation of the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of our Board of Directors. We will pay the costs of soliciting proxies, including the cost of printing, postage and handling. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our officers, directors and other employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by other appropriate means. It is anticipated that banks, brokers, fiduciaries, custodians and nominees will forward proxy soliciting materials to their principals, and that we will reimburse these persons’ out-of-pocket expenses.

Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for ten days prior to the annual meeting, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., at our principal executive offices at 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, by contacting the Secretary.

How can I obtain a copy of the 2024 Annual Report and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024?

You may access, read and print copies of the proxy materials for this year’s annual meeting, including our proxy statement, form of proxy card, and annual report to stockholders, at the following Web address: http://www.edocumentview.com/WD.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports; proxy statements; and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information we file with the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. At the written request of any stockholder who owns common stock as of the close of business on the record date, we will provide, without charge, paper copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and financial statement schedule, as filed with the SEC, except exhibits thereto. If requested by eligible stockholders, we will provide copies of the exhibits for a reasonable fee. You can request a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, free of charge, by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability or by mailing a written request to: Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

You should rely only on the information provided in this proxy statement. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. You should assume that the information in this proxy statement is accurate only as of the date of this proxy statement, or, where information relates to another date set forth in this proxy statement, as of that date.

​

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1: Election of Directors for a One-Year Term Expiring at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Our Board of Directors, or the Board, is currently comprised of seven directors, each with terms expiring at the 2025 annual meeting. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended to our Board the seven nominees set forth below for election or re-election, as applicable, as directors to serve for one-year terms until the 2026 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Following the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation, our Board has nominated those persons set forth below.

Based on its review of the relationships between the director nominees and the Company, and as discussed in greater detail below, the Board has affirmatively determined that, other than our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, William M. Walker, the following six director nominees are “independent” under the rules of the NYSE: Jeffery R. Hayward, Ellen Levy, Gary S. Pinkus, John Rice, Dana L. Schmaltz and Donna C. Wells.

The Board knows of no reason why any nominee would be unable to serve as a director. If any nominee is unavailable for election or service, the Board may designate a substitute nominee and the persons designated as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote on the substitute nominee recommended by the Board, or the Board may, as permitted by our bylaws, decrease the size of our Board.

Vote Required

A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board of Directors (Proposal 1) if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast as to such nominee. If a nominee who is an incumbent director does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast as to such nominee, the director shall offer his or her resignation to the Board of Directors, and the Board will consider whether to accept or reject the director’s offer to resign. Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted. For purposes of the election of directors, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.

Our Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES SET FORTH BELOW.

​

Nominees for Election for a One-Year Term Expiring at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

The following table sets forth the name and age of each nominee for director, indicating all positions and offices with us currently held by the director.

​

Set forth below are descriptions of the backgrounds and principal occupations of each of our nominees for director, and the period during which he or she has served as a director. Also set forth below are specific experience, qualifications, skills and attributes that supported the Board’s determination to nominate the director for election or re-election, as applicable.

​

Mr. Walker has been a member of our Board since July 2010 and a board member of Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our operating company, or its predecessors since February 2000. Mr. Walker has served as our chief executive officer since January 2007. He also previously served as our president from January 2005 to April 2015 and as our executive vice president and chief operating officer from September 2003 to January 2005. Mr. Walker currently serves on the board of the National Multifamily Housing Council and also is a member of the Real Estate Round Table. Mr. Walker received his Bachelor of Arts in Government from St. Lawrence University and his Master’s in Business Administration from Harvard University.

​

​

Mr. Hayward has been a member of our Board since May 2024. Mr. Hayward served as Fannie Mae’s executive vice president and chief administrative officer from August 2020 until his retirement in December 2023.  Prior to that role, Mr. Hayward served as head of multifamily at Fannie Mae from 2012 to August 2020, first as senior vice president from 2012 to 2014 and then as executive vice president from 2014 to August 2020. During his 36-year tenure at Fannie Mae, Mr. Hayward held many leadership roles, including head of single-family mortgage servicing during the Great Recession.  Mr. Hayward received his Bachelor of Science in Business Management from Widener University.

​

​

Dr. Levy has been a member of our Board since March 2019. Dr. Levy serves as managing director of Silicon Valley Connect, LLC, a management consulting company she founded. From 2008 to April 2012, Dr. Levy served in various roles at LinkedIn Corporation, a professional social networking internet service, including as its vice president of strategic initiatives from March 2010 to April 2012. From 2021 to 2024, Dr. Levy served as a member of the board of directors of Learn CW Investment Corporation, a blank check company. From 2021 to 2023, Dr. Levy served as a member of the Board of Healthwell Acquisition Corp. I, a special acquisition company. From 2015 to 2020, Dr. Levy served as a member of the board of directors of Instructure, Inc., a publicly traded educational technology company. Dr. Levy received her Bachelor of Science from the University of Michigan and a Masters and Doctorate in cognitive psychology from Stanford University.

​

​

Mr. Pinkus has been a member of our Board since June 2024. Mr. Pinkus has served as chairman of McKinsey & Company (“McKinsey”) in North America since 2018. Prior to that role, he served as the managing partner of McKinsey’s North America practice from 2015 to 2018, managing partner of McKinsey’s West Coast practice from 2006 to 2013 and managing partner of McKinsey’s San Francisco office from 2003 to 2006. Mr. Pinkus is also the former global leader of McKinsey’s Private Equity & Principal Investors Practice, which he helped found more than two decades ago. He has served on McKinsey’s Shareholders Council since 2009 and has chaired McKinsey’s Senior Partners Committee since 2019. Mr. Pinkus also previously chaired McKinsey’s Risk, Audit and Governance

Committee, Strategy Committee and Finance and Infrastructure Committee. Mr. Pinkus currently serves on the board of directors of Bloom Energy Corporation, a publicly traded manufacturer of solid oxide fuel cells. He also currently serves on the Board of Trustees of Wake Forest University and as Chair of the U.S. Ski and Snowboard Finance Committee. Mr. Pinkus holds a B.A. in English and Quantitative Economics from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

​

​

Mr. Rice has been a member of our Board since July 2010 and has served as our Lead Director since June 2024 and also previously served as our Lead Director from September 2010 to June 2012. Mr. Rice is the chief executive officer of Management Leadership for Tomorrow, a national non-profit organization that he founded in 2001. Management Leadership for Tomorrow advances racial equity by elevating the career and economic trajectory of people of color and by changing employer practices to improve outcomes for all. Prior to Management Leadership for Tomorrow, Mr. Rice was an executive with the National Basketball Association from 1996 to 2000, where he served as managing director of NBA Japan and as director of marketing for Latin America. Before joining the National Basketball Association, Mr. Rice spent four years with the Walt Disney Company in new business development and marketing, and two years with AT&T. Mr. Rice is a member of the board of directors and lead director of Opendoor Technologies Inc., a publicly traded digital platform for residential real estate, where he serves as a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee. From 2021 to 2023, Mr. Rice also served on the board of directors of Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp., a publicly traded blank check company. Mr. Rice also serves on the board of directors of Morgan Stanley Real Estate’s Prime Property Fund, a private fund. Mr. Rice serves on the boards of several non-profits including New Profit, a venture philanthropy fund. Mr. Rice received his Bachelor of Arts from Yale University and his Master’s in Business Administration from Harvard University.

​

​

Mr. Schmaltz has been a member of our Board since December 2010. Mr. Schmaltz is currently a partner at Yellow Wood Partners, LLC, a private equity firm he founded, which is focused on the consumer products industry. Mr. Schmaltz was the co-founder, director and chief financial officer of Blacksmith Brands, Inc., a privately owned consumer products company that was created in September 2009. As the co-founder and a senior manager of Blacksmith Brands, Mr. Schmaltz was responsible for overseeing the operations of the business with the senior management team, as well as for developing future acquisition opportunities for the company. Prior to founding Blacksmith Brands, Mr. Schmaltz was a managing partner of West Hill Partners, LLC, a Boston-based private equity firm, from 2007 to 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Schmaltz was the president of J.W. Childs Associates, LP, a private equity fund, where he focused on investments in the consumer/specialty retail sector, and served as partner of J.W. Childs from 1997 to 2007. Mr. Schmaltz received his Bachelor of Arts in History from Dartmouth College and his Master’s in Business Administration from Harvard University.

​

​

Ms. Wells has been a member of our Board since March 2021. Ms. Wells is chief executive officer of Valencia Ventures, LLC, a strategic consulting and corporate governance firm which she founded. From 2010 to 2017, Ms. Wells served as president and chief executive officer of Mindflash Technologies, Inc., an innovative, venture-backed enterprise software company. From 2007 to 2009, Ms. Wells was chief marketing officer at Mint Software, Inc. (“Mint”) where she led the growth strategy for this mobile personal finance software company from product launch to the company’s acquisition by Intuit. Prior to Mint, Ms. Wells led US marketing for Intuit and the Expedia Group, roles which drew on her 20 years of experience in strategic marketing with leading brands including The American Express Company and The Charles Schwab Corporation. Ms. Wells is a member of the board of directors of Mitek Systems, Inc., a publicly traded software development company, where she is the chair of the nominating and governance committee and has served as a member of the audit and compensation committees. Ms. Wells was previously a director and risk committee

member at Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded bank holding company from 2014 to 2018, and as a director and audit committee member at Apex Technology Acquisition Corporation, a publicly traded special acquisition company, from 2019 to its merger in 2021 with enterprise software provider AvePoint. She also serves on the board of Betterment Holdings, Inc., a leading independent digital wealth management platform. In September 2019, Ms. Wells was appointed by the Center for Entrepreneurial Studies at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business as a Lecturer in Management. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and a Master’s in Business Administration from Stanford University.

Corporate Governance Information

We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance, which we believe are essential to running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders well and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. Accordingly, our Board has adopted and maintains the following corporate governance guidelines, codes and charters:

From time to time, we may revise the above-mentioned corporate governance guidelines, codes and charters in response to changing regulatory requirements, evolving best practices and the concerns of our stockholders and other constituents. Please visit our website at www.walkerdunlop.com to view or obtain a copy of the current version of any of these documents. We will provide any of the above-mentioned documents, free of charge, to any stockholder who sends a written request to:

Walker & Dunlop, Inc.

Attn: Investor Relations

7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

References to our website address throughout this proxy statement are for informational purposes only, or to fulfill specific disclosure requirements of the SEC’s rules. These references are not intended to, and do not, incorporate the contents of our website by reference into this proxy statement.

Director Independence

Our bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines conform to the NYSE rules, which require us to have a majority of independent board members and a nominating/corporate governance committee, compensation committee and audit committee, each comprised solely of independent directors.

To adequately assess and ensure that (i) at least a majority of our directors qualify as independent and (ii) each of the Board committees is comprised of solely independent directors, the Board assesses annually the independence of all directors and director nominees. In accordance with the independence criteria established by the Board from time to time, our Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in order to make an affirmative determination as to whether any director has a direct or indirect material relationship to the Company. In assessing the materiality of a director’s or nominee’s relationship with the Company, the Board considers the issues from the director’s or nominee’s standpoint and from the perspective of the persons or organization with which the director or nominee has an affiliation. Our Board has evaluated the status of each current director and each director nominee, and has affirmatively determined, after considering the relevant facts and circumstances and the independence standards set forth above, that each of Jeffery R. Hayward, Ellen Levy, Gary S. Pinkus, John Rice, Dana L. Schmaltz and Donna C. Wells is independent, as

defined in the NYSE rules, and that none of these directors have a material relationship with us. In evaluating Mr. Rice’s independence, the Board considered the payment in 2024 of $53,750 by us to Management Leadership for Tomorrow (“MLT”), a not-for-profit entity of which Mr. Rice serves as chief executive officer, in connection with certain human resources consulting services.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Walker serves as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Board has determined that combining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company and believes that combining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles fosters clear accountability, effective decision-making and alignment on corporate strategy.

Nevertheless, the Board understands that the structure of the Board must encourage the free and open dialogue of competing views and provide for strong checks and balances. Specifically, an effective governance structure must balance the powers of the Chief Executive Officer and the independent directors and ensure that the independent directors are fully informed, able to discuss and debate the issues that they deem important, and able to provide effective oversight of management.

The Board is committed to maintaining a “Lead Director” as a matter of good corporate governance. The Lead Director is an independent director consistent with criteria established by the NYSE and will be selected on an annual basis by a majority of the independent directors then serving on the Board. The role of the Lead Director is to serve as liaison between (i) the Board and management, including the Chief Executive Officer, (ii) independent directors and (iii) interested third parties and the Board. The Lead Director serves as the focal point of communication to the Board regarding management plans and initiatives and ensures that the role between board oversight and management operations is respected. The Lead Director reviews and provides input on full Board meeting agendas, and plays a central role in developing, managing and overseeing our annual Board self-assessment process along with the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Lead Director acts as chairman of executive sessions of our independent directors and also provides the medium for informal dialogue with and among independent directors, allowing for free and open communication within that group. For example, the Lead Director frequently holds informal conference calls with our independent directors prior to our quarterly Board meetings to discuss any issues the directors would like raised at the Board meetings. In addition, the Lead Director serves as the communication conduit for third parties who wish to communicate with the Board. Our current Lead Director is Mr. Rice.

The Board carefully considers the effectiveness of the Board leadership structure at least annually in connection with its self-assessment.

Management Succession Planning

At least annually, Mr. Walker, our CEO, and our Executive Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer (the “CHRO”) provide an in-depth succession planning report to our Compensation Committee detailing succession plans for our CEO and our other executive officers and certain other members of management considering long-term, medium-term and short-term options. The Compensation Committee’s discussion and views and the written succession plan presented to the Committee are also reported to the full Board. Additionally, the Board also has ongoing exposure to, and regular interaction with, succession candidates through their periodic participation in Board meetings and/or engagement outside of Board meetings.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management and Independent Directors

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE rules, in order to promote open discussion among independent directors, our Board devotes a portion of each regularly scheduled Board meeting to executive sessions of only independent directors. See “— Director Independence” for a list of our independent directors. The Lead Director acts as chairman of each of the executive sessions described above.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board (i) by sending any correspondence they may have in writing to the “Lead Director” c/o the Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary of Walker & Dunlop, Inc., at 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, who will then directly forward such correspondence to the Lead Director, or (ii) by e-mailing correspondence directly to the Lead Director at leaddirector@walkerdunlop.com. The Lead Director will decide what action should be taken with respect to the communication, including whether such communication should be reported to the Board.

Board Meetings and Director Attendance

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, (i) we are required to have at least four regularly scheduled Board meetings in each calendar year and additional unscheduled Board meetings may be called upon appropriate notice at any time to address specific needs of the Company; and (ii) directors are expected to attend, in person or by telephone or video conference, all Board meetings and meetings of committees on which they serve. Our Board held nine Board meetings in 2024. Each of our directors serving on the Board in 2024 attended at least 75% of the total regularly scheduled and special meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served. Additionally, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. One of the seven directors elected to the Board at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders attended the meeting.

Criteria for Board Membership

The Board has adopted a policy to be used for considering potential director candidates to further the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s goal of ensuring that our Board consists of a diversified group of qualified individuals that function effectively as a group. The policy provides that qualifications and credentials for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing composition of the Board. However, at a minimum, candidates for director must possess:

In addition to the aforementioned minimum qualifications, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also believes that there are other qualities and skills that, while not a prerequisite for nomination, should be taken into account when considering whether to recommend a particular person. These factors include:

Neither the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee nor the Board has adopted a formal policy with respect to diversity of its directors. In connection with its overall director candidate review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does consider diversity of experience in areas that are relevant to the Company’s activities, including, for example, experience in commercial real estate, commercial lending, technology and finance and experience as a board member of a publicly traded company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also remains committed to ensuring that a broad pool of candidates are considered when selecting new Board nominees. Directors must be willing and able to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties effectively. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account the other demands on the time of a candidate, including, for example, occupation and memberships on other boards.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will seek to identify director candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including (i) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members and other members of the Board, (ii) our stockholders and (iii) others as it deems appropriate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to consult with or retain advisors or search firms to assist in identifying qualified director candidates. Gary S. Pinkus was initially recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

​

As part of the identification process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the number of expected director vacancies and whether existing directors have indicated a willingness to continue to serve as directors if re-nominated. Once a director candidate has been identified, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then evaluate this candidate in light of their qualifications and credentials, and any additional factors that it deems necessary or appropriate. Existing directors who are being considered for re-nomination will be re-evaluated as part of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s process of recommending director candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all persons recommended by stockholders in the same manner as all other director candidates, provided that such recommendations are submitted in accordance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws and summarized below.

After completing the identification and evaluation process described above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board the nomination of a number of candidates equal to the number of director vacancies that will exist at the annual meeting of stockholders. The Board will then select the Board’s director nominees for stockholders to consider and vote upon at the stockholders’ meeting.

Board Refreshment

The Board refreshes its membership through a combination of adding or replacing directors to achieve the appropriate balance of maintaining longer-serving directors with deep institutional knowledge of the Company and adding directors who bring a fresh perspective. At the time of our Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2010, the Board was comprised of eight directors, six of whom were not members of management and five of whom were independent. Since our IPO:

​

Engagement with Stockholders

We engage frequently and actively with our stockholder base through participation in conferences, non-deal roadshows in partnership with sell side analysts, and company-organized one-on-one or group meetings and conference calls. In 2024, we traveled for various in-person investor conferences and meetings, but it is apparent that virtual meetings remain the preference for many investors. Virtual meetings are a very efficient way to conduct a day of

meetings with investors across the world, and as a result, we will continue to participate in virtual events (in combination with in-person meetings) for the foreseeable future. A summary of 2024 in-person and virtual outreach is listed below:

During these meetings, we discussed macroeconomic conditions affecting our competitive environment and our business, our financial and operating results, our five-year business strategy, our corporate governance and other matters of executive compensation and our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiatives.

Our Strategy and Alignment of Director Skills and Experience

We have a track record of setting long-term growth plans with quantitative financial objectives. Consistent with that approach, in 2020, we adopted an ambitious five-year business strategy, named Drive to ‘25.

Our Drive to ‘25 strategy is centered around growing debt financing volume, expanding our property sales platform, growing our servicing portfolio, building investment banking and asset management capabilities, and achieving environmental and social goals. Our Drive to ‘25 strategy includes the following five-year operational, financial and ESG targets to be achieved by year-end 2025:

​

To achieve these ambitious targets, we are focusing on the following areas:

​

Successful execution of our growth strategy involves organic growth, recruiting additional bankers and brokers, business acquisitions and successful integration of the people and businesses we acquire and developing and implementing proprietary technology to improve our product and service offerings and the efficiency of our business operations. The Board believes that, collectively, the nominees bring to the Board, through a variety of backgrounds and experiences, including through education, direct hands-on experience and managerial roles, a diverse range of skills and experience in relevant areas that align with our growth strategy, as depicted in the following table:

Stockholder Recommendations of Director Nominees

For nominations for election to the Board to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must comply with the advance notice provisions and other requirements of Article II, Section 12 of our bylaws. These notice provisions require that nominations for directors must be received by the Secretary at our principal

executive offices (the “Stockholder Notice”) not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting, nor earlier than the 150th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, such Stockholder Notice to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 150th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of the 120th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. See also “OTHER MATTERS — Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2026 Annual Meeting.”

Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers; Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and all other senior financial officers. This code is intended to:

We have also adopted the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees. This code covers areas of professional conduct, including honest and ethical conduct, conflicts of interest, public disclosure, compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, corporate opportunities, confidentiality, fair dealing and the protection and proper use of Company assets.

We have posted both our Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to our website and intend to promptly post any waiver or amendment of our Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers to our website.

In addition to the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Audit and Risk Committee has in place a whistleblower reporting procedure that enables it to receive, retain and treat complaints received regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. The procedures in place permit our employees to confidentially and anonymously submit their concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters directly to the Audit and Risk Committee. Upon receiving a concern or complaint pursuant to these procedures, the individual designated by our Chief Executive Officer as our compliance officer (currently, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Daniel J. Groman) or the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee, will:

Insider Trading Policy

The Company has adopted an insider trading policy governing the purchase, sale and other dispositions of the Company’s securities that applies to all personnel of the Company and its subsidiaries, including directors, officers and employees and other covered persons that we believe is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, as well as applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

Risk Oversight

The Board continuously monitors risk oversight and designates one meeting each year at which the Board works with management to conduct an in-depth review of the Company’s strategic plans and identify the principal issues and risks to its ongoing operations and accomplishing its strategy. While the full Board has primary responsibility for risk oversight, it utilizes its committees, as appropriate, to monitor and address the risks that may be within the scope of a particular committee’s expertise or charter. The Board believes that the composition of its committees, and the distribution of the particular expertise of each committee’s members, makes this an appropriate structure to more effectively monitor the risks that relate to the committees’ respective oversight authorities. In accordance with NYSE Corporate Governance Standards, the Audit and Risk Committee charter assigns to the Audit and Risk Committee the responsibility to review our policies and procedures with respect to risk assessment and risk management. In 2024, we also appointed a Chief Risk Officer to oversee the key risks and risk management controls of the Company. The Audit and Risk Committee receives regular reports from our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, our Chief Risk Officer and our SVP of Internal Audit on the Company’s inventory of key risks and the risk management controls and other monitoring mechanisms related to the risks and how management identifies new and emerging risks. As it relates to specific risks, the Audit and Risk Committee oversees our financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the performance of our internal audit function and cybersecurity risk. The Audit and Risk Committee receives quarterly reports from our Chief Information Security Officer and our Chief Information Officer on our cybersecurity risks and meets in executive session with our Chief Information Security Officer following such reports. Additionally, the Chief Information Security Officer oversees our information security team, which works in partnership with our internal audit department to review information technology-related internal controls with our external auditors as part of the overall internal controls process.

An important feature of the Board’s risk oversight function is to receive regular updates at each quarterly Board meeting from its committees and management. For example, each year our senior management will work with the SVP of Internal Audit, who reports directly to the Audit and Risk Committee, to develop an audit plan designed to address key corporate governance controls, financial reporting and internal control risks and pre-implementation reviews of significant corporate projects. This plan will subsequently be approved by the Audit and Risk Committee, and our internal auditors will report the audit results to the Audit and Risk Committee on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as needed. The SVP of Internal Audit also meets with the Audit and Risk Committee in executive session at least quarterly. In addition, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary meets regularly with the Audit and Risk Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and provides them with regular updates regarding material litigation and legal and regulatory compliance matters.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing compensation risk, including evaluating and assessing risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees and ensuring executive compensation is aligned with performance. The Compensation Committee is charged with monitoring our equity-based compensation plans, including employee benefit plans. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risk related to our overall governance, including Board and committee composition, Board size and structure, director independence, ethical and business conduct and ESG risks.

The full Board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and related activities through standard reports to the Board by each committee chairman, frequent non-member attendance at committee meetings and committee meeting materials, minutes and resolutions which are made available to all directors. Current and emerging strategic, operational and competitive risks are presented and discussed at the Board’s regular quarterly meetings. In addition to receiving direct information from its committees, the Board receives updates directly from members of management. For example, a committee of senior management comprised of representatives of our balance sheet loan origination, loan underwriting, loan servicing, accounting, legal, human resources, investment advisory, broker-dealer, information security, investor relations, internal audit, tax credit syndication and treasury groups meet monthly to discuss current and emerging risks that we face and prepare a written report to the full Board at least quarterly, describing key risks faced by us and how they are addressed. We also have an information technology risk committee comprised of senior managers in our information technology, including our Chief Information Security Officer, loan origination, loan servicing, accounting, and legal groups that meets monthly to review information security risks and the development and implementation of policies and procedures and other controls to mitigate cybersecurity and other information security risks. Our Chief Information Security Officer provides a report to our management risk committee on the activities of the information technology risk committee, and the management risk committee, in turn, reports regularly to the full Board on its activities.

​

Additionally, as needed between Board meetings, Mr. Walker, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, reports to the Board on the critical issues we face and recent developments in our business units, including identified risks. The Board believes the leadership structure described in “— Board Leadership Structure” above facilitates the Board’s oversight of risk management because it allows the Board, with leadership from the Lead Director and working through its committees, including the independent Audit and Risk Committee, to proactively participate in the oversight of management’s actions.

Board Committees

The Board has a standing Audit and Risk Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All members of the committees described below are “independent” under NYSE rules as discussed under “BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Corporate Governance Information — Director Independence.” In addition, the members of the Audit and Risk and Compensation Committees satisfy the additional independence criteria applicable to members of such committees under SEC and NYSE rules.

The table below provides membership information for each of the Board committees as of March 7, 2025 and the number of meetings held by each committee in 2024:

Audit and Risk Committee

Our Audit and Risk Committee consists of Jeffery R. Hayward, Gary S. Pinkus and Donna C. Wells, three of our independent directors, with Ms. Wells serving as the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee. Each of Ms. Wells and Mr. Pinkus qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined by the applicable SEC regulations. Our Board has also determined that each Audit and Risk Committee member is “financially literate” as that term is defined by the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. We have adopted an Audit and Risk Committee charter that details the principal functions of the Audit and Risk Committee, including oversight related to:

The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for engaging an independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, including all audit and non-audit services, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The Audit and Risk Committee also prepares the Audit and Risk Committee report required by SEC regulations to be included in our annual proxy statement.

Our Audit and Risk Committee charter and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE require that, in the event a director simultaneously serves on the audit committee of more than three public companies, including us, the Board must determine that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of that member to effectively serve on our Audit and Risk Committee and disclose that determination. None of our Audit and Risk Committee members serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies (including our Audit and Risk Committee).

The Audit and Risk Committee met six times in 2024.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee consists of Jeffery R. Hayward, Ellen Levy, John Rice and Dana L. Schmaltz, four of our independent directors, with Mr. Rice serving as the Chair of the Compensation Committee. We have adopted a Compensation Committee charter that details the principal functions of the Compensation Committee, including:

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee consisting of one or more members.

Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has authority to retain compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, in its sole discretion, to assist it in discharging its duties. The Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) in 2024 to act as its compensation consultant. Pay Governance reported directly to the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee had the sole authority to terminate the engagement.

Pay Governance’s primary roles for 2024 were to:

Pay Governance did not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee concluded that Pay Governance had no conflicts of interest during fiscal year 2024. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered all relevant factors, including the six independence factors relating to committee advisors that are specified in the NYSE rules. These factors are:

For further discussion of the role of the Compensation Committee in the executive compensation decision-making process, and for a description of the nature and scope of Pay Governance’s assignments, see the section titled “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.”

Our Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of Mr. Walker regarding any Company and individual performance targets, assessments of performance and compensation levels generally for our executive officers. Mr. Walker presents a self-assessment of his own individual performance to the Compensation Committee and makes recommendations regarding his own compensation, but the Compensation Committee considers the compensation determination without Mr. Walker and other members of management being present. Senior members of the human resources, legal, finance and accounting departments may also provide input to the Compensation Committee concerning matters relevant to the compensation plans and amounts, including compensation plan structure, individual and company-specific performance achievements and the impacts of the compensation plans and related payments on the Company’s financial performance, but neither they, nor any other employee of the Company, are present for executive sessions of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee met seven times in 2024.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Ellen Levy, John Rice, Dana L. Schmaltz and Donna C. Wells, four of our independent directors, with Ms. Levy serving as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We have adopted a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter that details the principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, including:

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met seven times in 2024.

​

AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS

Proposal 2:   Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 were audited by KPMG LLP, which served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the last fiscal year. The Audit and Risk Committee has appointed KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025. We have been advised by KPMG LLP that representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at our 2025 annual meeting. These representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the Audit and Risk Committee to be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the audit work of the independent registered public accounting firm. Nevertheless, our Board is submitting the appointment of KPMG LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, the Audit and Risk Committee may reconsider the appointment or may retain KPMG LLP or another accounting firm without resubmitting the matter to stockholders. Even if the stockholders ratify the appointment, the Audit and Risk Committee may select another firm if it determines such selection to be in our and our stockholders’ best interest.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not count as votes cast with respect to the proposal and will have no effect on the result of the vote.

Our Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2025.

Disclosure of KPMG LLP Fees for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023

The following table shows the fees for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG LLP during those periods:

All services provided by KPMG LLP to us since we became a public company have been pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Committee, either pursuant to the Audit and Risk Committee’s Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy or through a separate pre-approval by the Audit and Risk Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by KPMG LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence from us.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit and Risk Committee’s policy is to review and pre-approve, either pursuant to the Audit and Risk Committee’s Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy or through a separate pre-approval by the Audit and Risk Committee, any engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to provide any audit or permissible non-audit service to the Company. Pursuant to the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy, which the Audit and Risk Committee will review and reassess annually, a list of specific services within certain categories of services, including audit and audit-related services, are specifically pre-approved for the upcoming or current fiscal year, subject to an aggregate maximum annual fee payable by us for each category of pre-approved services. Any service that is not included in the approved list of services must be separately pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Committee. Additionally, all audit and permissible non-audit services in excess of the pre-approved fee level, whether or not included on the pre-approved list of services, must be separately pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Committee. The Audit and Risk Committee has delegated authority to its Chair to specifically pre-approve engagements for the performance of audit and permissible non-audit services, for which the estimated cost for each specified type of service shall not exceed $100,000. The Audit and Risk Committee Chair must report all pre-approval decisions to the Audit and Risk Committee at its next scheduled meeting and provide a description of the terms of the engagement, including:

Report of the Audit and Risk Committee

One of the Audit and Risk Committee’s principal purposes is to assist the Board in overseeing the integrity of our consolidated financial statements. Our management team has the primary responsibility for our consolidated financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, audits the annual financial statements prepared by management and expresses an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit and Risk Committee reviewed and discussed our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 with our management and representatives of KPMG LLP. Management represented to the Audit and Risk Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The Audit and Risk Committee is also responsible for assisting the Board in overseeing the qualification, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit and Risk Committee discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit and Risk Committee received the written disclosures from KPMG LLP, as well as engaged in a dialogue, as required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit and Risk Committee concerning independence, and discussed with KPMG LLP the independence of KPMG LLP from us. The Audit and Risk Committee also has considered whether the provision of any non-audit services, and any fees charged for such non-audit services, by KPMG LLP are compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG LLP from us.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit and Risk Committee recommended to the Board that our audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

​

The Audit and Risk Committee report above does not constitute “soliciting material” and will not be deemed “filed” or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate our SEC filings by reference, in whole or in part, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in those filings.

​

​

​

​

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE

We understand the importance of operating our business in a socially responsible and environmentally sustainable manner in order to maximize stockholder value, and we regularly consider ways to improve our internal culture and the communities in which we operate while also supporting our clients in their sustainability efforts.

Our key ESG efforts include:

Human Capital and Workforce Excellence

We believe the foundation of our success begins with hiring and developing a highly skilled and motivated employee base. All employees take part in our rigorous goal setting and performance review each year. In 2024, we continued various mentoring and sponsorship programs, learning initiatives, and employee support and outreach efforts to support the ongoing development and advancement of all of our employees. We believe that our culture is extremely strong today, as evidenced by the results of our 2024 Great Place to Work^® survey, which revealed that 90% of respondents feel that we are a great place to work and 94% believe our leadership is honest and ethical in its business practices.

We monitor and evaluate various talent metrics and report out to management monthly on various important metrics, including hiring, turnover and promotions. Our voluntary annualized turnover rate was 8%, and our average tenure was 5 years for the year ended December 31, 2024.

We offer eight employee resource groups (“ERGs”) to foster connection between employees from a wide variety of backgrounds. Our ERGs are open to all employees. We are purposeful in our drive to promote a workplace where all of our employees feel welcome, are engaged and can develop within the Company. We are committed to driving our long-term performance in part through our various human capital efforts, consistent with applicable law. We do not make employment decisions on the basis of any legally protected characteristic.

​

Community Outreach

It is our policy to give back to the communities in which we operate, and overall, to financially support the fight against homelessness, food scarcity and improve education nationwide in the United States. We included a community giving target of 1% of annual income from operations in our Drive to ‘25 corporate strategy, and in 2024, we contributed $1.6 million, or 1.21% of our 2024 income from operations, to charitable organizations we and our employees sponsor. We provide all employees with paid time off for volunteering in their communities, and we also encourage every employee to participate in at least one community-focused event each year. We offer a matching fund program for charitable donations and volunteer hours to support and recognize contributions and involvement in causes that matter personally to our employees. We also hold an annual charitable fundraiser focused on addressing homelessness where we match our employee contributions dollar-for-dollar. Additionally, we finance billions of dollars of affordable housing properties each year through our debt financing activities and have a scaled low income housing tax credit equity syndication business that supports the development and preservation of affordable housing.

Environmental Stewardship

We strive to reduce the negative environmental impact of our day-to-day operations on the planet. We work with an international consulting firm to measure and manage our carbon footprint through the purchase of carbon offsets and renewable energy credits on a yearly basis. We are proactive in implementing corporate policies and practices focused on energy conservation and waste reduction throughout our 44 offices with a focus on making changes that will reduce our emissions in pursuit of our emissions reduction goal as described below. Our Environmental Policy can be found on our website. In addition, during 2024, we issued our annual report addressing the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which can also be found on our website. Our Environmental Policy and TCFD-aligned report do not constitute “soliciting material” and will not be deemed “filed” or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that might incorporate our SEC filings by reference, in whole or in part, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in those filings.

Key ESG Targets

We have set the following targets related to our core ESG focus areas that we aim to achieve by the end of 2025:

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees our ESG efforts and receives a report from management on our ESG activities at each quarterly meeting. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews and monitors (1) the development and implementation of goals established from time to time for our performance with respect to ESG initiatives, (2) the development of metrics to gauge progress toward achievement of those goals, and (3) our progress against those goals.

More information about our ESG efforts, including Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) disclosures, can be found in our most recent ESG Report published on our website. The ESG Report does not constitute “soliciting material” and will not be deemed “filed” or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act that might incorporate our SEC filings by reference, in whole or in part, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in those filings. Additionally, we may provide, both in our SEC filings and extra regulatory reporting, information that is not necessarily material for SEC reporting purposes but that is informed by various ESG standards and frameworks (including standards for the measurement of underlying data), internal controls, and assumptions that are still evolving and subject to change. For example, we note that standards and expectations regarding GHG accounting and the processes for measuring and counting GHG emissions and GHG emission reductions are evolving, and it is possible that our approaches both to measuring our emissions and to reducing emissions and measuring those reductions may be, either currently by some stakeholders or at some point in the future, considered inconsistent with common or best practices with respect to measuring and accounting for such matters. We also rely on third-party information for certain of these disclosures, which may change over time as methodologies and data availability and quality continue to evolve. These factors, as well as any inaccuracies in third party information we use, including in estimates or assumptions, may cause results to differ materially and adversely from statements, estimates, and beliefs made by us or third-parties. Moreover, our disclosures based on any standards may change due to revisions in framework requirements, availability of information, changes in our business or applicable governmental policies, or other factors, some of which may be beyond our control.

​

​

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers as of March 7, 2025. Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of our Board.

​

Executive Officer Biographies

Set forth below are descriptions of the backgrounds of each of our executive officers, other than Mr. Walker, whose background is described above (See “BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Nominees for Election for a One-Year Term Expiring at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders”).

Gregory A. Florkowski has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since June 2022. He previously served as Walker & Dunlop, LLC’s Senior Vice President and Controller from December 2010 to January 2019 and as Executive Vice President, Business Development from February 2020 to June 2022. Mr. Florkowski is responsible for our Financial Reporting, Budgeting and Accounting, Corporate Treasury, Business Development and Investor Relations groups and, together with the other executive officers, the overall strategic direction of our Company. Mr. Florkowski also has served as a member of the board of managers of Walker & Dunlop, LLC since June 2022. Mr. Florkowski began his career at KPMG. In his role at KPMG, Mr. Florkowski last worked as a senior manager in the assurance practice where he primarily served public companies in the financial services industry and non-public companies in financial services, private equity and specialty finance. Mr. Florkowski holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Salisbury University.

Stephen P. Theobald has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since June 2022. He served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 2013 to June 2022. Mr. Theobald is responsible for our Servicing and Asset Management, Investment Management, Investment Banking and Research, Valuation and Appraisal, Technology and Marketing groups and, together with the other executive officers, the overall strategic direction of our Company. Mr. Theobald also has served as a member of the board of managers of Walker & Dunlop, LLC since April 2013. From December 2010 to March 2013, Mr. Theobald served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., a publicly traded holding company for Bank of Hampton Roads, a Virginia state-chartered commercial bank. From April 2010 to November 2010, Mr. Theobald served as a financial consultant to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Mr. Theobald also held a number of senior financial positions at Capital One Financial Corporation from 1999 to 2010, most recently serving as Chief Financial Officer, local banking, from 2005 to 2010. Mr. Theobald began his career at KPMG LLP in 1984, and he served as audit partner, financial services, from 1996 to 1999. From 1990 to 1992, he served as a professional accounting fellow in the Office of the Chief Accountant at the Comptroller of the Currency. Mr. Theobald received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Notre Dame.

Daniel J. Groman has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary and our Chief Compliance Officer since November 2024. He previously served as our Interim General Counsel, Secretary, and Chief Compliance Officer starting in May 2024, before assuming his current role in November 2024. Prior to this, he was Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary beginning in 2012, having joined the Company as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary in November 2011. Mr. Groman is responsible for our Legal, Compliance and Enterprise Risk Groups, administration and oversight of the internal audit functions and, together with

the other Executive Officers, the overall strategic direction of our Company. Before joining the Company, Mr. Groman served as associate general counsel and assistant corporate secretary at Freddie Mac and was an associate at Arnold & Porter LLP. Mr. Groman earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of Maryland and his Juris Doctor from the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law.

Paula A. Pryor serves as our Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, where she oversees all things “people” at Walker & Dunlop. In her role, she is responsible for talent acquisition, total rewards, talent management, human capital, learning and development, charitable giving, internal communications, events, office services, and the overall culture and strategic direction of our Company. Ms. Pryor also has served as a member of the board of managers of Walker & Dunlop, LLC since May 2020. Ms. Pryor joined us in 2009 and served as Vice President, Human Resources from 2009 to 2013 and as Senior Vice President, Human Resources from 2013 to 2018, when she was promoted to Executive Vice President. Prior to joining Walker & Dunlop, Ms. Pryor served as a Manager of Human Resources at Capital Source Inc. from 2007 to 2009 and as a Manager of the People Team at Katzenbach Partners from 2002 to 2007. Beyond the company, Ms. Pryor serves on the board of Leadership Women and as a trustee of The Woods Academy. Ms. Pryor graduated cum laude from the University of Richmond with a Bachelor of Arts in International Studies and Spanish, and a minor in History. She completed her Master’s degree in Latin American Political Economy with distinction at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.

​

​

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Committee establishes the underlying policies and principles of our compensation programs. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation programs for our named executive officers (the “NEOs”) and explains in detail the process the Committee followed to reach its 2024 compensation decisions. Our NEOs for 2024 were:

​

Executive Summary

The Compensation Committee places significant value on linking our NEOs’ compensation to the long-term value creation for our stockholders and is strongly committed to pay and performance alignment. Our executive compensation program is designed to appropriately reward our NEOs to successfully manage our distinctive business model and execute on our ambitious long-term business plan, the Drive to ‘25. On an annual basis, we evaluate and make executive compensation decisions based on a comprehensive review of our short-term and long-term performance, current market practices and governance trends, among other factors.

Our Business Model and Ambitious Long-Term Business Plan

We are a leading commercial real estate (i) services, (ii) finance, and (iii) technology company in the United States. Through investments in people, brand, and technology, we have built a diversified suite of commercial real estate services to meet the needs of our customers. Our services include: (i) multifamily lending and property sales, (ii) commercial real estate appraisal, valuation, research, debt brokerage and advisory services, (iii) investment management, and (iv) affordable housing lending, tax credit syndication, development, and investment. We have a long track record of delivering strong growth through establishing ambitious five-year business plans, and in 2021, we embarked on our current five-year plan called the Drive to ‘25.

The Drive to ‘25 includes the following ambitious five-year operational, financial and ESG targets to be achieved by year-end 2025:

​

2024 Performance Highlights

While 2024 continued to present challenging market conditions, Walker & Dunlop successfully navigated these challenges to execute our business plan, delivering strong financial results across our business lines, bolstered by strong

growth in transaction volume in the fourth quarter of 2024, which was up 45% year-over-year. We also delivered record adjusted EBITDA for 2024. As we enter the final year of our Drive to ‘25 business plan, we remain focused on our objectives and maintaining our position as a market leader through our continued investment in people, brand, and technology.

Drive to ‘25 Progress

Despite the challenges impacting the commercial real estate industry and us in 2024, our executive management team continued to make progress towards our long-term Drive to ‘25 operational objectives including:
​

​

2024 Financial Results

Financial results for the year ended December 31, 2024 include the following:

ESG Efforts

In addition to our financial achievements, we continued to build on our market leading ESG initiatives in alignment with our Drive to ‘25 goals:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Total Shareholder Return Performance

Consistent with our long-term growth strategy, we aim to deliver long-term growth to our stockholders through the successful execution of our business plan. Over the past five years in addition to delivering strong financial performance, we have generated total shareholder return of 70%. Over the longer 10-year period, we have significantly outperformed our peers as illustrated below. The following table shows our comparative 10-Year TSR growth based on the value of $100 invested on 12/31/2014, including reinvested dividends, through 12/31/2024.

Source: S&P Global Capital IQ Pro

History of Strong Say on Pay Support

​

​

Compensation Governance

​

We are committed to strong compensation governance:

​

​

2024 NEO Compensation Review

​

Our Compensation Committee is firmly committed to a pay-for-performance philosophy and undertakes a thorough review of our performance each year. For 2024, the Compensation Committee reviewed (i) our short-term and long-term performance, (ii) the current competitive market in which we compete for talent, and (iii) external market conditions. Based on these factors and our rigorous pay-for-performance formulaic structure, the following key compensation actions were taken by the Compensation Committee:

​

​

Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of Company and individual performance, market competitiveness and internal equity considerations, 2024 target compensation levels were increased for the NEOs other than Mr. Groman, who was appointed to the role of EVP, General Counsel & Secretary in November 2024. Prior to this increase, for the majority of our NEOs, target compensation has not been meaningfully adjusted since 2021. For our CEO, there was no increase to his cash compensation; instead, his increase was delivered solely in the form of an increase to his target equity incentive compensation to further strengthen alignment with our stockholders.

​

​

While 2024 proved to be another challenging year, we successfully executed on our business plan, exceeding our targeted adjusted EBITDA and revenue goals while executing on our strategic goals. While we exceeded our targeted hurdles, our maximum performance hurdles are designed to reward our NEOs for significant outperformance. Accordingly, our annual cash incentive payouts funded slightly above target for our CEO (112%) and 120% of target on average for our other NEOs.

​

​

Illustrating the rigor of our long-term performance goals, no payout was earned under the 2022-2024 Performance Share Plan, despite continued momentum and growth in 2024.

​

Setting Executive Compensation

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is designed to provide a competitive and market-aligned total compensation package that attracts and rewards our executives for significant performance achievements. We believe that our compensation program should:

Role of Board and Management in Compensation Decisions

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee continued to retain Pay Governance in 2024 to provide the Compensation Committee with independent compensation data, analysis and advice. Pay Governance reported directly to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee had the sole authority to approve the terms of, and terminate, their engagement. For additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s use of Pay Governance, refer to “BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Board Committees — Compensation Committee” above.

Use of Peer Group

The Compensation Committee strives to maintain a compensation program that is both appropriate and competitive with the market in which we compete for both executive talent and business opportunities. Given that our business model has no direct publicly traded peers, the Compensation Committee carefully selected companies in consultation with Pay Governance that on a blended basis would best reflect our unique operations. In constructing an appropriate peer group, we took into consideration the following criteria:

The peer group used while reviewing 2024 executive pay levels was modified to remove Cowen Inc. after it was acquired by TD Bank Group in March 2023, and to add Newmark Group, Inc. The 2024 peer group (shown below) was comprised of the 16 companies noted below. On a standalone basis, each peer group company does not fully reflect our scope of operations, but, on an aggregate basis, the peer group reflects the most comparable public companies to us.

Comparative market data is not used by the Compensation Committee to “benchmark” the amount of total compensation or any specific element of compensation for the NEOs. Instead, the Compensation Committee aims to provide total pay opportunities to our executives based on consideration of a number of factors, including pay levels for executives in similar positions within our peer group, the nature and scope of each executive’s duties, individual

performance, and internal pay positioning, taking into account each executive’s pay components and levels relative to other executives.

Source: S&P Global Capital IQ Pro.

* Effective June 10, 2024, Ocwen Financial Corporation rebranded as Onity Group Inc.

​

2024 Key Elements of Compensation

Our compensation program for our NEOs consists of the following elements, each of which satisfies one or more of our alignment, performance and retention objectives:

​

​

Mix of Target Total Direct Compensation

Our executive compensation reflects a well-aligned pay-for-performance program that emphasizes variable performance-based pay. The charts below show the relative amounts for each element of total direct compensation comprised of base salary, target annual incentive, Annual Equity Award and award of Performance Share Units (based on 2024 target levels). Approximately 89% of our CEO’s compensation and ~80% of our other NEOs’ compensation (on average) is variable and performance-based, tied to the achievement of financial and operational performance. These variable and performance-based elements are not guaranteed and are subject to rigorous performance goals and performance assessments.

2024 Executive Officer Compensation

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries annually, and considers the following factors (among others):

In its review, the Compensation Committee also considers the impact of base salary on other elements of compensation. For 2024, based on the Compensation Committee’s review of the above factors, in addition to the fact that base salaries have not been adjusted for our NEOs in several years, base salaries were increased for our NEOs (excluding our CEO).

​

Base salaries for each of our NEOs in 2024 and 2023 were as follows:

(1) The amounts shown for 2024 were generally effective as of January 1, 2024. The amount shown for Mr. Groman reflects his annualized base salary, effective June 1, 2024, which was increased from $300,000 in connection with his appointment as General Counsel.

Annual Cash Incentive Award

Each NEO is eligible to receive cash awards based on the achievement of pre-determined financial goals, strategic objectives and individual performance criteria at threshold, target and maximum levels as a percentage of base salary. These payout levels are established in consideration of each NEO’s position and responsibilities, applicable market data and our overall compensation philosophy that emphasizes performance-based compensation.

For 2024, the Compensation Committee reviewed the NEOs’ annual incentive opportunities based on both individual performance and contributions and competitiveness relative to the market. Based on its review, the Committee established the following annual incentive opportunities as a percentage of base salary, which increased year-over-year for all NEOs (excluding the CEO):

​

In March 2024, the Company established the 2024 annual cash incentive plan based on pre-determined goals set by the Compensation Committee. The Company-specific performance goals include adjusted EBITDA, total revenues and diluted EPS, with each goal weighted at 25%, as set forth in the table below. Target performance goals for each of these metrics were set at levels that require meaningful year-over-year growth from 2023. Consistent with our pay philosophy, maximum performance levels require significant stretch performance compared to past years, such that maximum payout would only be achieved for truly outstanding results. In the event that one or more of the metrics fall between two of the levels in the table, the value of the cash incentive with respect to that metric would be calculated by linear interpolation.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee considered achievement of goals related to corporate leadership and strategic initiatives and human capital initiatives. The corporate leadership and strategic initiatives include corporate performance and individual performance goals designed to support the achievement of our Drive to ‘25 strategy, and they are collectively weighted at 15%. The goals related to human capital initiatives were weighted at 10%.

​

2024 Corporate Leadership and Strategic Achievements

In determining that the corporate leadership and strategic initiatives goals were achieved at the maximum level for Messrs. Walker and Florkowski, and achieved at target level for Messrs. Theobald, Groman and Ms. Pryor, the Compensation Committee took into account external awards, employee feedback, employee turnover, progress towards the relevant Drive to ‘25 goals, and other key metrics related to the employee experience. The following section sets forth the 2024 corporate leadership and strategic initiatives goals on both a Company-wide and individual basis and the related results:

Company-Wide Goals – Continue Executing on the Drive to ‘25 Goals

Lead sales and manage financial performance

Maintain market leadership position through continued investment in people, brand, and technology

Impact the communities where Walker & Dunlop provides services to increase the supply of affordable housing, give back, and create community

Continue to lead on Governance, Social Impact, and Environmental Stewardship to create sustainable communities where people live, shop, work, and play

​

Individual Corporate Leadership and Strategic Goals and Achievements

Establish and lead corporate structure to execute business and grow market position

Lead and focus technology efforts to transform the Company

Expand the Company’s brand through client and industry engagement, new media, and the Walker Webcast

Continually improve financial reporting through system implementation, transparent reporting, and outcomes management

Maintain conservative capital structure

Collaborate with CEO and executive management on capital deployment strategy and allocation

Proactively manage Investor Relations to ensure the Company’s strategy, financial results, and execution capabilities are clearly understood

​

​

Innovate client interaction in Servicing and Asset Management

Make technology, cybersecurity, innovation, brand, and data key business differentiators throughout the enterprise

Grow regulatory AUM in co-mingled funds

Identify multiple, significant operational improvements for the enterprise and begin implementation

​

Secure the team, address any immediate risks and ensure that all regulatory and compliance issues are managed effectively with transition into legal leadership role

Enhance the Company’s Enterprise Risk Program

Implement enterprise-wide contract management software and processes

Effectively manage the Company’s legal and regulatory compliance efforts

​

Work with employee resource groups, and across the organization, to make the Company a great place to work

Implement and measure active talent management and retention

Strategize, innovate, and monitor office engagement efforts to build community, drive collaboration, and expand the W&D culture

​

2024 Human Capital Goals and Achievements

The goals related to human capital initiatives included in the 2024 cash incentive plan were designed to foster a positive and consistent experience across all employees. Measurement is assessed based on a review of external audits/awards, employee feedback from internal and third-party surveys, employee turnover, and other key metrics. Based on the low employee turnover, high employee engagement, greater consistency in the lived employee experience as reported in the Great Place to Work survey results and recognition as top workplace by the Washington Post and Great Place to Work Institute™, in addition to other industry awards, the Compensation Committee determined this goal was fully achieved. While we believe that an inclusive work environment is important to our long-term business performance, we also recognize the importance of pursuing such initiatives in a legally compliant manner. We aim to only reward legally compliant methods of achieving our goals, and this is included in the Compensation Committee’s consideration for payout of executive incentives. It is our policy to not make employment decisions on the basis of legally protected characteristics.

Annual Cash Incentive Payout

In 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s performance was above target level with respect to Adjusted EBITDA and Total Revenues, between threshold and target level with respect to Diluted EPS and at maximum level for our CEO and CFO and target level for our other NEOs with respect to the corporate leadership and strategic initiatives and human capital initiatives. Based on the Compensation Committee’s determination of 2024 performance, the Compensation Committee awarded annual cash incentive payouts to our NEOs for 2024 as set forth in the table below:

​

Equity Awards

The equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2024 consisted of: (i) an annual equity award of restricted stock and (ii) Performance Share Units, representing a performance-based long-term equity incentive award for the 2024-2026 performance period. Award opportunities for 2024 were based on a review of individual performance, market competitiveness and internal equity considerations. Based on this review the Compensation Committee established equity award opportunities for 2024 as follows:

​

Annual Equity Award

The annual equity award for the NEOs is comprised entirely of restricted stock (based on the fair value on the date of the grant). The restricted stock granted to the NEOs in 2024 vests ratably on February 15 in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Restricted stock award values were based on a review of individual performance and management responsibilities.

Our NEOs were granted a total of 40,453 shares of restricted stock in 2024. In addition to serving as a retention tool with awards vesting over a long-term three-year vesting period, restricted stock further aligns the interests of the NEOs with our stockholders through the promotion of significant share ownership. Each NEO’s 2024 restricted stock award is detailed below.

​

2024-2026 Performance Share Plan

In 2024, the Compensation Committee approved awards of Performance Share Units (which are performance-based long-term equity incentive awards) for the Company’s NEOs and senior management to drive outstanding performance over the next three years. Consistent with prior years, under these 2024 Performance Share Unit awards, the NEOs are eligible to receive a payout in the form of shares of stock if certain pre-established performance goals (tied to average diluted EPS, aggregate total revenues and return on equity) underlying the award are met over the course of the 2024

through 2026 performance period. Consistent with the Performance Share Unit awards granted in 2023, a TSR outperformance modifier was included in the awards granted to the CEO and the COO.