|
NEW YORK
LONDON
SINGAPORE
PHILADELPHIA
CHICAGO
WASHINGTON, DC
SAN FRANCISCO
SILICON VALLEY
SAN DIEGO
LOS ANGELES
BOSTON
HOUSTON
DALLAS
FORT WORTH
AUSTIN
|
FIRM and AFFILIATE OFFICES
|
HANOI
HO CHI MINH CITY
SHANGHAI
ATLANTA
BALTIMORE
WILMINGTON
MIAMI
BOCA RATON
PITTSBURGH
NEWARK
LAS VEGAS
CHERRY HILL
LAKE TAHOE
MYANMAR
|
|
THOMAS G. SPENCER
DIRECT DIAL: +1 215 979 1218
PERSONAL FAX: +1 215 689 4405
E-MAIL: TGSpencer@duanemorris.com
|
||
|
www.duanemorris.com
|
|
RE:
|
StoneMor Inc.
|
|
Schedule 13E-3 filed by StoneMor Inc., Axar Capital Management, LP,
|
|
|
Axar Cemetery Parent Corp., and Axar Cemetery Merger Corp.
|
|
|
File No.: 005-91276
|
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement filed August 5, 2022
|
|
|
File No.: 001-39172
|
|
Duane Morris llp
|
|
|
30 SOUTH 17TH STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196
|
PHONE: +1 215 979 1000 FAX: +1 215 979 1020
|
| 1. |
We note the disclaimer at the end of this section relating to the affiliate status of filing persons. Given your determination to file a Schedule 13E-3, it is inappropriate to disclaim such
affiliate status. Similarly, you have included several disclaimers in the proxy statement that introduce doubt as to the affiliate status of filing persons. Please review your disclosure in both filings.
|
| 2. |
Please revise the form of proxy card to indicate it is preliminary. Also, confirm that any proxy cards received prior to your filing of a definitive proxy statement will not be tallied.
|
| 3. |
Please revise the sixth paragraph of the cover letter, and any similar disclosure elsewhere in the proxy statement, to clarify whether the board’s fairness determination addressed fairness as
to the unaffiliated security holders, not all security holders. Please make a similar revision in the last paragraph of the section captioned “Position of the Axar Group Members as to Fairness of the Merger” (page 46).
|
| 4. |
We note that the board based its fairness determination in part on the recommendation of the Conflicts Committee. We also note that the Conflicts Committee considered the Duff & Phelps
opinion. Note that if any filing person has based its fairness determination on the analysis of factors undertaken by others, such person must expressly adopt this analysis and discussion as their own in order to satisfy the disclosure
obligation. See Question 20 of Exchange Act Release No. 34-17719 (April 13, 1981). Thus, please revise to state, if true, that the board adopted the Conflicts Committee analyses and conclusion as its own, and, similarly, that the Conflicts
Committee adopted Duff & Phelps’ analyses and conclusions as its own. Alternatively, revise your disclosure to include disclosure responsive to Item 1014 of Regulation M-A and to address the factors listed in instruction 2 to Item 1014.
|
| 5. |
Please revise to include the full projections instead of a summary for both the January and May 2022 projections.
|
| 6. |
We note, on page 18, that Duff & Phelps made a presentation to the Conflicts Committee on January 10, 2022. Please file such presentation as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3 and summarize
the contents of that presentation in this section.
|
| 7. |
We note on page 41 that certain analyses were “…primarily used for informational purposes.” Please disclose how else those analyses were utilized.
|
| 8. |
We note in the section captioned “Miscellaneous” that Duff & Phelps was engaged to provide services to a member of the company’s board. Please name that person and disclose the fees
received by Duff & Phelps.
|
| 9. |
Note that neither Schedule 13E-3 nor Schedule 14A specifically permit general “forward incorporation” of documents to be filed in the future. Please revise.
|
|
Very truly yours,
|
|
| /s/ Thomas G. Spencer | |
|
Thomas G. Spencer
|