UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

OR

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

OR

OR

Date of event requiring this shell company report

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number: 001-39087

Youdao, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Cayman Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

No. 399, Wangshang Road,

Binjiang District Hangzhou 310051,

People’s Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices)

Feng Zhou

Chief Executive Officer

Tel: +86 0571-8985-2163

E-mail: zf@rd.netease.com

No. 399, Wangshang Road, Binjiang District

Hangzhou 310051, People’s Republic of China

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

* Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing of the American depositary shares on the New York Stock Exchange.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

[None]

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

[None]

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

120,459,757 ordinary shares, comprised of 32,471,397 Class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.0001 per share, and 87,988,360 Class B ordinary shares, par value US$0.0001 per share, as of December 31, 2025.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ☐ No ☒

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards † provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☐ No ☐

table of contents

Introduction

Except where the context otherwise indicates and for the purpose of this annual report only:

Unless otherwise noted, all translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars and from U.S. dollars to Renminbi in this annual report are made at RMB6.9931 to US$1.00, the exchange rate set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board on December 31, 2025. We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, or at all.

Forward-Looking Information

This annual report contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “expect,” “should,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate” and “potential,” among others.

Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places in this annual report and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations. Forward-looking statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to various factors, including, but not limited to, those identified under the section entitled “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors” in this annual report. These risks and uncertainties include factors relating to:

Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions about our business and the markets in which we operate prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those described as anticipated, estimated or expected in this annual report.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and except to the extent required by applicable laws and regulations, we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new information or future developments or to release publicly any revisions to these statements in order to reflect later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

Youdao, Inc. is a Cayman Islands holding company with no operations of its own. Youdao, Inc. conducts its operations in China through its PRC subsidiaries and consolidated variable interest entities, or the VIEs, and their subsidiaries. As used in this annual report, “we,” “us,” “our company,” “our,” or “Youdao” refers to Youdao, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. We and our direct and indirect subsidiaries do not, and it is virtually impossible for us and our subsidiaries to, have any equity interests in the VIEs as current PRC laws and regulations restrict foreign investment in companies that engage in value-added telecommunication services, and prohibit foreign investment in companies that engage in radio and television program production and operation business. As a result, we depend on certain contractual arrangements with the VIEs, which allows us to be considered the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, and to consolidate their operating results in our financial statements under the U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under U.S. GAAP are satisfied. Nonetheless, investors in our equity securities should note that they are purchasing equity securities of a Cayman Islands holding company rather than equity securities issued by our subsidiaries or the VIEs. Neither such investors nor the holding company itself have an equity ownership in, direct investment in, or control of, through such ownership or investment, the VIEs. Investors who are non-PRC residents may never directly hold equity interests in the VIEs under current PRC laws and regulations.

The VIE structure involves unique risks to investors in the ADSs. In 2023, 2024 and 2025, the amount of revenues generated by the VIEs and their subsidiaries accounted for 77.0%, 73.4% and 66.9%, respectively, of our total net revenues. As of December 31, 2024 and 2025, the total assets of the VIEs and their subsidiaries, excluding amounts due from other companies in the Youdao Group Companies, equaled to 48.8% and 53.6% of our consolidated total assets as of the same dates, respectively. As of the date of this annual report, to our best knowledge, the contractual agreements with the VIEs have not been tested in a court of law in the PRC. If the PRC government deems that our contractual arrangements with the VIEs do not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to material penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations or otherwise significantly change our corporate structure. We and our investors face substantial uncertainty about potential future actions by the PRC government that could affect the legality and enforceability of the contractual arrangements with the VIEs and, consequently, significantly affect our ability to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs and the financial performance of our company as a whole. Our Class A ordinary shares, our ADSs or other equity securities may decline in value or become worthless if we are unable to effectively enforce our contractual control rights over the assets and operations of the VIEs. For a detailed discussion of the risk associated with the VIE structure, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—There are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations, and rules relating to the agreements that establish the VIE structure for our and the VIEs’ operations in China, including potential future actions pursuant to the laws and regulations in force at that time, which could affect the enforceability of our contractual arrangements with the VIEs and, consequently, significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations. If the PRC government finds our contractual arrangements non-compliant with relevant PRC laws, regulations, and rules, or if these laws, regulations, and rules or the interpretation thereof change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in the VIEs” and the other risk factors discussed under “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure.”

Implication of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act

Pursuant to the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (the “HFCAA”), if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years because of a position taken by authorities in a foreign jurisdiction, the SEC will prohibit our shares or the ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States. On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, including our auditor. In May 2022, the SEC conclusively listed us as a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA following the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination and removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. For this reason, we were not at risk of having our securities subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCAA unless a new determination is made by the PCAOB. Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we continue to use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year and would be at risk of having our securities subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCAA. There can be no assurance that we would not be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for any future fiscal year, and if we were so identified for two consecutive years, we would become subject to the prohibition on trading under the HFCAA. See “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements and the inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditor in the past has deprived our investors with the benefits of such inspections” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Our ADSs may be prohibited from trading in the United States under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely auditors located in China. The delisting of the ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.”

Contractual Arrangements and Corporate Structure

We are a Cayman Islands company and currently conduct substantially all business operations in the PRC through our subsidiaries incorporated in the PRC, and the VIEs and their subsidiaries. Certain of our PRC subsidiaries maintain a series of contractual arrangements with the VIEs, through which we conduct a significant portion of our and the VIEs’ businesses in China. It is the VIEs that hold certain key operating licenses material to their business operations, provide services to our customers, and enter into contracts with our suppliers. We operate our and the VIEs’ businesses this way because PRC laws and regulations restrict foreign investment in companies that engage in value-added telecommunication services, and prohibit foreign investment in companies that engage in radio and television program production and operation business. These contractual arrangements entered into with the VIEs allow us to (i) be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, (ii) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs, and (iii) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. These contractual arrangements include the operating agreement, equity pledge agreement, exclusive purchase option agreement, shareholder voting right trust agreement, loan agreement, and cooperation agreement, as the case may be. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we are considered the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, and consolidate their operating results in our financial statements under U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under the U.S. GAAP are satisfied.

We do not have any equity interests in the VIEs which are owned by certain nominee shareholders. As a result, even though these contractual arrangements allow us to be considered the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, which results in the consolidation of VIEs’ operating results in our financial statements under the U.S. GAAP to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under the U.S. GAAP are satisfied, we do not have an equity ownership in, direct investment in, or control of (through such ownership or investment), the VIEs, and we could face heightened risks and costs in enforcing these contractual arrangements, because the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations, and rules relating to the legality and enforceability of these contractual arrangements may be amended from time to time. For the risks related to the nominee shareholders of the VIEs, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Corporate Structure—Any failure by the VIEs or their shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material adverse effect on our business.” If the PRC government finds such agreements to be illegal, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in the VIEs.

Transfer of Funds and Other Assets

Youdao, Inc., our Cayman Islands holding company, remits funds to our wholly-owned Hong Kong subsidiaries by making capital contributions or providing loans to them, and our Hong Kong subsidiaries remit funds to our PRC subsidiaries by making capital contributions to them. Youdao, Inc. also remits funds to Youdao Information, one of our PRC subsidiaries, by providing loans.

Under relevant PRC laws and regulations, we are permitted to remit funds to the VIEs through loans rather than capital contributions. In 2023, 2024 and 2025, we did not make any loans to the VIEs. The VIEs fund their operations primarily using cash generated from operating and financing activities. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.A. History and Development of the Company—Selected Condensed Consolidating Schedule,” and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

As of December 31, 2025, Youdao, Inc. had made cumulative capital contributions of US$126.2 million to our PRC subsidiaries through intermediate holding company, and were accounted as long-term investments of Youdao, Inc. Furthermore, funds of US$455.0 were provided by Youdao, Inc. to Youdao Information through loans before 2024, which were accounted as loans to subsidiary. In 2024 and 2025, Youdao Information repaid the loans of US$30.0 million and US$11.0 million to Youdao, Inc, respectively. These funds have been used by our PRC subsidiaries for their operations. As of December 31, 2025, the loan balance Youdao Information and Youdao Hangzhou made to the VIEs’ nominee shareholders under the VIE agreements was RMB21.0 million (US$3.0 million). For details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.C. Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs and the VIEs’ Respective Shareholders—Loan Agreements.” The VIEs may transfer cash to our PRC subsidiaries by paying service fees in accordance with the relevant contractual arrangements. In 2023, 2024 and 2025, the VIEs transferred RMB3,287.5 million, RMB3,091.2 million and RMB1,769.0 million (US$253.0 million), respectively, to our PRC subsidiaries as payment or prepayment of service fees. Youdao Information and Youdao Hangzhou, our PRC subsidiaries, maintained certain personnel for content production, sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative functions to support the operations of the VIEs.

As of December 31, 2024 and 2025, the prepayment of service fees from the VIEs to our PRC subsidiaries amounted to RMB1,187.2 million and RMB369.0 million (US$52.8 million), respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2025, the outstanding balance of service fees owed by the VIEs to our PRC subsidiaries amounted to RMB739.5 million and RMB96.3 million (US$13.8 million), respectively. There were no other assets transferred between VIEs and non-VIEs in 2023, 2024 and 2025.

Investors in our securities should note that, to the extent cash in the business is in the PRC or a PRC entity, the funds may not be available to fund operations or for other use outside of the PRC due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations on the ability of Youdao, Inc., its subsidiaries, or the VIEs by the PRC government to transfer cash. As advised by our PRC legal counsel, for any amounts owed by the VIEs to our PRC subsidiaries under the VIE agreements, unless otherwise required by PRC tax authorities, we are able to settle such amounts under the current effective PRC laws and regulations, provided that the VIEs have sufficient funds to do so. Our PRC subsidiaries are permitted to pay dividends to their shareholders, and eventually to Youdao, Inc., only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Such payment of dividends by entities registered in China is subject to limitations, which could result in limitations on the availability of cash to fund dividends or make distributions to shareholders of our securities. For example, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs are required to make appropriations to certain statutory reserve funds or may make appropriations to certain discretionary funds, which are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent liquidation of the companies. For more details, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Summary of Risk Factors,” “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business,” “—PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay us from making loans or additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries and to make loans to the VIEs, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our and the VIEs’ business” and “—If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders and ADS holders.” Youdao, Inc. has not previously declared or paid any cash dividend or dividend in kind, and has no plan to declare or pay any dividends in the near future on our shares or the ADSs representing our ordinary shares. We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business. As of the date of this annual report, we do not have cash management policies in place that dictate how funds are transferred between Youdao, Inc., our subsidiaries, the VIEs and the investors. Rather, the funds can be transferred in accordance with the applicable PRC laws and regulations discussed in this section. See “Item 8. Financial Information—8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”

For the purpose of illustration, the below table reflects the hypothetical taxes that might be required to be paid within China, assuming that: (i) we have taxable earnings, and (ii) we determine to pay a dividend in the future:

Notes:

(1) The tax calculation has been simplified for the purpose of this example. The hypothetical book pre-tax earnings amount, which does not consider timing differences, is assumed to equal the taxable income in the PRC.

(2) Under the terms of the VIE agreements, sales service fees are charged by our PRC subsidiaries to the VIEs. For all the periods presented, these fees are recognized as cost of revenues of the VIEs, with a corresponding amount as service income by our PRC subsidiaries and eliminated in consolidation. For income tax purposes, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs file income taxes on a separate company basis. The fees paid are recognized as a tax deduction by the VIEs and as income by our PRC subsidiaries and are tax neutral.

Upon the instance that the VIEs reach a cumulative level of profitability, because our PRC subsidiaries occupy certain trademarks and copyrights, the agreements will be updated to reflect charges for such trademarks and copyrights usage on the basis that they will qualify for tax neutral treatment.

(3) China’s Enterprise Income Tax Law imposes a withholding income tax of 10% on dividends distributed by a Foreign Invested Enterprises (“FIE”) to its immediate holding company outside of China. A lower withholding income tax rate of 5% is applied if the FIE’s immediate holding company is registered in Hong Kong or other jurisdictions that have a tax treaty arrangement with China, subject to a qualification review at the time of the distribution. For the purpose of this hypothetical example, this table has been prepared based on a taxation scenario under which the full withholding tax would be applied.

The table above has been prepared under the assumption that all profits of the VIEs will be distributed as fees to our PRC subsidiaries under tax neutral contractual arrangements. If in the future, the accumulated earnings of the VIEs exceed the fees paid to our PRC subsidiaries, or if the current and contemplated fee structure between the intercompany entities is determined to be non-substantive and disallowed by Chinese tax authorities, the VIEs could make a non-deductible transfer to our PRC subsidiaries for the amounts of the stranded cash in the VIEs. This would result in such transfer being non-deductible expenses for the VIEs but still taxable income for the PRC subsidiaries. Such a transfer and the related tax burdens would reduce our after-tax income to approximately 50.6% of the pretax income. Our management believes that there is only a remote possibility that this scenario would happen.

Restrictions on Foreign Exchange and the Ability to Transfer Cash between Entities, Across Borders and to U.S. Investors

In the future, if and when we become profitable, Youdao, Inc.’s ability to pay dividends, if any, to its shareholders and ADS holders and to service any debt it may incur will depend upon dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries. Under PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions with respect to paying dividends or otherwise transferring any of their net assets offshore to Youdao, Inc. In particular, under the current effective PRC laws and regulations, dividends may be paid only out of distributable profits. Distributable profits are the net profit as determined under PRC GAAP, less any recovery of accumulated losses and appropriations to statutory and other reserves required to be made. Each of our PRC subsidiaries is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, after making up previous years’ accumulated losses, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such a fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. As a result, our PRC subsidiaries may not have sufficient distributable profits to pay dividends to us in the near future.

Furthermore, if certain procedural requirements are satisfied, the payment of current account items, including profit distributions and trade and service related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from State Administration of Foreign Exchange (the “SAFE”) or its local branches. However, where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses, such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies, approval from or registration with competent government authorities or its authorized banks is required. The PRC government or its authorized banks may take measures at its discretion from time to time to restrict access to foreign currencies for current account or capital account transactions. If the foreign exchange authorities prevent us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our offshore intermediary holding companies or ultimate parent company, and therefore, our shareholders or investors in our ADSs. Further, we cannot assure you that new regulations or policies will not be promulgated in the future, which may further restrict the remittance of RMB into or out of the PRC. We cannot assure you, in light of the restrictions in place, or any amendment to be made from time to time, that our current or future PRC subsidiaries will be able to satisfy their respective payment obligations that are denominated in foreign currencies, including the remittance of dividends outside of the PRC. If any of our subsidiaries incurs debt on its own behalf in the future, the instruments governing such debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends to Youdao, Inc. In addition, our PRC subsidiaries are required to make appropriations to certain statutory reserve funds, which are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent liquidation of the companies.

For PRC and United States federal income tax consideration of an investment in the ADSs, see “Item 10. Additional Information—10.E. Taxation.”

Recent Regulatory Development

Cybersecurity Review Measures

On December 28, 2021, the CAC published the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022 and repealed the Cybersecurity Review Measures promulgated on April 13, 2020. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network products and services, and platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list abroad must apply for cybersecurity review.

Our PRC legal counsel has consulted the competent government authorities which acknowledged that, under the currently effective PRC laws and regulations, a company that has been listed on a foreign stock exchange before the promulgation of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures is not required to go through a cybersecurity review by the CAC to conduct a securities offering or to maintain its listing status on the foreign stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Based on the consultation, our PRC legal counsel is of the opinion that, under the currently effective PRC laws and regulations, we are not required to go through a cybersecurity review by the CAC to conduct a security offering or maintain our listing status on the NYSE. However, there remain uncertainties on the interpretation and implementations of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures since the regulation are subject to changes. If the CSRC, the CAC or other regulatory agencies later require that we obtain their approvals for our future offshore offerings, we may be unable to obtain such approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, implementation of industry-wide regulations affecting our operations could limit our ability to attract new customers and/or users and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors of our company and our business face potential uncertainty from actions taken by the PRC government affecting our business.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not been involved in any investigations or become subject to a cybersecurity review initiated by the CAC based on the Cybersecurity Review Measures, and we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions in such respect or any regulatory objections to our listing status from the CAC.

CSRC Filing Required for Overseas Listing and Securities Offerings

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report relevant information to the CSRC. Domestic companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures are not required to complete filing with the CSRC to maintain its listing status on the foreign stock exchange, but are required to file with the CSRC within three working days after such domestic company completes a subsequent security offering on the foreign stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Since the Overseas Listing Trial Measures was newly promulgated, its interpretation, application and enforcement may change from time to time. If the filing procedure with the CSRC under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures is required for any future offerings, listing or any other capital raising activities by us, it is uncertain whether we could complete the filing procedure in a timely manner, or at all. We have been closely monitoring regulatory developments in China regarding any necessary approvals from the CSRC, the CAC, or other PRC regulatory authorities required for overseas listings. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanction or regulatory objection from the CSRC.

Permission Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations and Overseas Securities Offerings

Except as disclosed in “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Industry—Our compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and the implementation measures issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially and adversely affected and may continue to affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect,” “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Industry—Our failure to obtain, maintain or renew other licenses, approvals, permits, registrations or filings necessary to conduct our and the VIEs’ operations in China could have a material adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations,” “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Industry—We may face risks and uncertainties with respect to the licensing requirement for internet audio-visual programs,” “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Industry—The AI industry faces changing laws and regulations, significant upfront investments and commercialization uncertainties. Integrating AI into our products and service offerings could lead to potential infringement claims and higher costs for regulatory compliance” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Industry—We are subject to a variety of laws and other obligations regarding data protection, any failure to comply with applicable laws and obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations,” based on the opinion of our PRC legal counsel, we believe our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs have obtained the requisite licenses and permits from the PRC government authorities that are necessary for their material business operations in China, including the ICP license, the Publication Operation Permit, the Permit for Production and Operation of Radio and TV Program and the Commercial Performance License. Given the evolving nature of interpretation and implementation of relevant laws and regulations and the enforcement practice by relevant government authorities, we or any of the VIEs may be required to obtain additional licenses, permits, filings, or approvals for the business operations in the future. If we or any of the VIEs are found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities may take actions in dealing with such violations or failures. In addition, if we or any of the VIEs had inadvertently concluded that such approvals, permits, registrations or filings were not required, or if applicable laws, regulations or interpretations change in a way that requires us or any of the VIEs to obtain such approval, permits, registrations or filings in the future, we or the relevant VIEs may be unable to obtain such necessary approvals, permits, registrations or filings in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals, permits, registrations or filings may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance may subject us or the relevant VIEs to fines and other regulatory, civil or criminal liabilities, and we or relevant VIEs may be ordered by the competent government authorities to suspend relevant operations, which will materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business operation. For risks relating to licenses and approvals required for our and the VIEs’ operations in China, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Our failure to obtain, maintain or renew other licenses, approvals, permits, registrations or filings necessary to conduct our and the VIEs’ operations in China could have a material adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Industry—We may face risks and uncertainties with respect to the licensing requirement for internet audio-visual programs.”

In addition, the PRC government has indicated an intent to exert more oversight over overseas securities offerings and published a series of laws and regulations to regulate such transactions. In connection with our prior overseas offerings and NYSE listing status, as of the date of this annual report, we (i) have not been required to obtain any permission from or complete any filing with the CSRC, and (ii) have not been required to go through a cybersecurity review by the CAC.

However, we cannot assure you how PRC governmental authorities will regulate overseas listings and offerings in general and whether we are required to complete any filing or obtain any specific regulatory approval from the CSRC, the CAC or any other PRC governmental authorities for our future overseas securities offerings. If we had inadvertently concluded that such filings or approvals were not required, or if applicable laws, regulations or interpretations change in a way that requires us to complete such filings or obtain such approvals in the future, we may be unable to fulfill such requirements in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could subject us to penalties, including fines, suspension of business and revocation of required licenses, significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. For more detailed information, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—The approval, filing or other requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC government authorities may be required under PRC law in connection with our issuance of securities overseas or maintenance of the listing status of our ADSs, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing or other requirements.”

Organizational Structure

The following chart shows our corporate structure, including our principal subsidiaries and the principal VIEs as of the date of this annual report.

Notes:

(1) Youdao HK currently operates our overseas online marketing and AI-driven subscription businesses.

(2) Shareholders of Linjiedian Education are William Lei Ding, our director (who is also the chief executive officer, a director and the largest shareholder of NetEase, our controlling shareholder), and Feng Zhou, our Chief Executive Officer and director, each holding 99% and 1%, respectively, of Linjiedian Education’s equity interests.

(3) Shareholders of Youdao Computer are William Lei Ding, our director (who is also the chief executive officer, a director and the largest shareholder of NetEase, our controlling shareholder), and Feng Zhou, our Chief Executive Officer and director, each holding approximately 71% and 29%, respectively, of Youdao Computer’s equity interests.

(4) Shareholders of Youdao Guangzhou Computer are Feng Zhou, our Chief Executive Officer and director, and Yinghui Wu, our Senior Vice President, each holding 99% and 1%, respectively, of Youdao Guangzhou Computer’s equity interests.

Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs and the VIEs’ Respective Shareholders

Current PRC laws and regulations impose certain restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in value-added telecommunication services and certain other businesses. We are a company registered in the Cayman Islands. Youdao Information and Youdao Hangzhou, our PRC subsidiaries, are considered foreign-invested enterprises. To comply with the foregoing restrictions imposed by PRC laws and regulations on foreign investments, we conduct a significant portion of our businesses in China through the VIEs in the PRC, based on a series of contractual arrangements between us and the VIEs and their respective shareholders. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we are considered the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, and consolidate their operating results in our financial statements under the U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under the U.S. GAAP are satisfied. In 2023, 2024 and 2025, the amount of revenues generated by the VIEs and their subsidiaries accounted for 77.0%, 73.4% and 66.9%, respectively, of our total net revenues. As a result, our ability to pay dividends depends upon dividends paid by our subsidiaries which, in turn, depends on the payment of service fees to our PRC subsidiaries by the VIEs in the PRC pursuant to certain contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiaries, the VIEs and the VIEs’ shareholders. In 2023, 2024 and 2025, the amount of service fees charged by our PRC subsidiaries to the VIEs was RMB2,881.0 million, RMB2,626.4 million and RMB2,218.5 million (US$317.2 million), respectively.

The following is a summary of the contractual arrangements by and among Youdao Information, Youdao Computer and the shareholders of Youdao Computer. The contractual arrangements with the other principal VIEs, except for the cooperation agreements, are substantially similar to the corresponding contractual arrangements as discussed below. For the complete text of these contractual arrangements, please see the copies filed as exhibits to this annual report.

In the opinion of Tian Yuan Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel, save for the uncertainties disclosed in this annual report, the contractual arrangements described in the “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.C. Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs and the VIEs’ Respective Shareholders” are valid, binding and enforceable under current PRC law. However, our PRC legal counsel has also advised us that current or future PRC laws and regulations are still evolving, the interpretation and application of which is subject to changes. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to the opinion of our PRC legal counsel. It is uncertain whether any new PRC laws or regulations relating to VIE structure will be adopted or if adopted, how they would affect the VIE structure. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that if the PRC government authorities find that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our value-added telecommunication services and other business do not comply with PRC government restrictions on foreign investment in such businesses, we could be subject to severe penalties including being prohibited from continuing operations. Additionally, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective as equity ownership in providing us with control over the VIEs. If the VIEs or their shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under such contractual arrangements, we could be limited in our ability to enforce such contractual arrangements in the PRC and may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot assure will be effective. Additionally, the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us is limited by certain PRC legal restrictions on the payment of dividends by PRC companies and foreign exchange control, among others, which prevent us from having unfettered access to our PRC subsidiaries’ and VIEs’ revenues. Our access to the VIEs’ revenues is also limited since we do not have equity ownership in the VIEs and have to rely on the payment of service fees by the VIEs to our PRC subsidiaries. For a more detailed description of the risks related to these contractual arrangements and our corporate structure, please see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” starting from page 42 of this annual report.

Cooperation Agreements

Youdao Computer and Youdao Information entered into a cooperation agreement, or the Youdao Computer Cooperation Agreement, on July 1, 2015. Under the Youdao Computer Cooperation Agreement, Youdao Information has agreed to provide the following services to Youdao Computer:

Youdao Computer has agreed to share its monthly income (after tax and expenses) with Youdao Information in accordance with certain formulas as specified in the Youdao Computer Cooperation Agreement. The Youdao Computer Cooperation Agreement was effective from July 1, 2015 and will continue to be effective unless it is terminated, in case of a material breach of the agreement, by written notice of the non-breaching party.

Linjiedian Education and Youdao Information entered into a cooperation agreement, or the Linjiedian Education Cooperation Agreement, on January 18, 2019, pursuant to which Youdao Information has agreed to provide the following services to Linjiedian Education:

Linjiedian Education has agreed to share its monthly income (after tax and expenses) with Youdao Information in accordance with certain formulas as specified in the Linjiedian Education Cooperation Agreement. The Linjiedian Education Cooperation Agreement was effective from January 18, 2019 and will continue to be effective unless it is terminated, in case of a material breach of the agreement, by written notice of the non-breaching party.

Youdao Guangzhou Computer and Youdao Hangzhou entered into a cooperation agreement, or the Youdao Guangzhou Computer Cooperation Agreement, on January 1, 2022, pursuant to which Youdao Hangzhou has agreed to provide the following services to Youdao Guangzhou Computer:

Youdao Guangzhou Computer has agreed to share its monthly income (after tax and expenses) with Youdao Hangzhou in accordance with certain formulas as specified in the Youdao Guangzhou Computer Cooperation Agreement. The Youdao Guangzhou Computer Cooperation Agreement was effective from January 1, 2022 and will continue to be effective unless it is terminated, in case of a material breach of the agreement, by written notice of the non-breaching party.

Operating Agreements

To ensure the successful performance of the various agreements between the parties, each of William Lei Ding and Feng Zhou, the shareholders of Youdao Computer, entered into an operating agreement with Youdao Computer and Youdao Information, with each agreement taking effect from September 26, 2016. Under the operating agreements, each of Youdao Computer, Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou agreed that, except for transactions in the ordinary course of business, Youdao Computer will not enter into any transaction that would materially affect the assets, liabilities, rights or operations of Youdao Computer without the prior written consent of Youdao Information. Youdao Information also agreed that it would provide performance guarantees and, at its discretion, guarantee loans for working capital purposes to the extent required by Youdao Computer for its operations. As counter-guarantee, Youdao Computer agreed to pledge the account receivable in its operations and all of its assets to Youdao Information, which pledge has not been implemented as of the date of this annual report. Furthermore, each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou agreed that, upon instruction from Youdao Information, he would appoint candidates recommended by Youdao Information as Youdao Computer’s board members, president, chief financial officer and other senior executive officers. The term of each operating agreement is 20 years from the date of execution and can be extended with the written consent of Youdao Information.

Equity Pledge Agreements

Each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou, the shareholders of Youdao Computer, has entered into an equity pledge agreement with Youdao Information, with each agreement taking effect from September 26, 2016. Under such equity pledge agreements, each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou pledged his respective equity interest in Youdao Computer to Youdao Information to secure his obligations under the applicable loan agreement, exclusive purchase option agreement, shareholder voting right trust agreement, and operating agreement. Each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou further agreed not to transfer or pledge his respective equity interest in Youdao Computer without the prior written consent of Youdao Information. Each of the equity pledge agreements will remain binding until the respective pledger, Mr. Ding or Dr. Zhou, as the case may be, discharges all his obligations under the above-mentioned agreements. As of the date of this annual report, the equity pledges under such Equity Pledge Agreements have been registered with competent PRC regulatory authority.

Exclusive Purchase Option Agreements

Each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou, the shareholders of Youdao Computer, has entered into an exclusive purchase option agreement with Youdao Information and Youdao Computer, with each agreement taking effect from September 26, 2016. Under the exclusive purchase option agreements, each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou granted Youdao Information an option to purchase all or a portion of his respective equity interest in Youdao Computer at a price equal to the original and any additional paid-in capital paid by him. In addition, under each exclusive purchase option agreement, Youdao Computer has granted Youdao Information an option to purchase all or a portion of the assets held by Youdao Computer or its subsidiaries at a price equal to the net book value of such assets. Each of Youdao Computer, Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou agreed not to transfer, mortgage or permit any security interest to be created on any equity interest in or assets of Youdao Computer without the prior written consent of Youdao Information. Each exclusive purchase option agreement shall remain in effect until all of the equity interests in or assets of Youdao Computer have been acquired by Youdao Information or its designee or until Youdao Information unilaterally terminates the agreement by written notice.

Shareholder Voting Right Trust Agreements

Each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou, the shareholders of Youdao Computer, has entered into a shareholder voting right trust agreement with Youdao Information, with each agreement taking effect from September 26, 2016. Under the shareholder voting right trust agreements, each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou agreed to irrevocably entrust a person designated by Youdao Information to represent him to exercise all the voting rights and other shareholders’ rights to which he is entitled as a shareholder of Youdao Computer. Each shareholder voting right trust agreement shall remain effective for as long as Mr. Ding or Dr. Zhou, as applicable, remains a shareholder of Youdao Computer unless Youdao Information unilaterally terminates the agreement by written notice.

Loan Agreements

Each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou, the shareholders of Youdao Computer, has entered into a loan agreement with Youdao Information, with each agreement taking effect from September 26, 2016. Under these loan agreements, Youdao Information provided each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou with an interest-free loan. The proceeds from the loans were used by each of Mr. Ding and Dr. Zhou to pay the consideration to acquire their respective equity interest in Youdao Computer. The loans can be repaid by transferring each of Mr. Ding’s and Dr. Zhou’s respective equity interest in Youdao Computer to Youdao Information or its designee or through such other method as Youdao Information shall determine. The term of each of the Loan Agreements is 10 years from the date of such agreement and will be automatically extended for a further 10-year term unless otherwise decided by Youdao Information.

We face various legal and operational risks associated with being based in and having the majority of our and the VIEs’ operations in China. These risks could result in a material change in our and the VIEs’ operations and/or the value of the securities we are registering for sale or could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. The PRC government has significant authority to exert influence on the ability of a China-based company, like us, to conduct its business, accept foreign investments or maintain our status as a company listed on a U.S. stock exchange, as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals pursuant to the laws and regulations in force at that time.

We also face risks associated with recent statements and regulatory actions by the PRC government, including those related to regulatory approvals of offshore offerings, anti-monopoly regulatory actions, cybersecurity and data privacy, regulations on the use of variable interest entities. For example, the PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight over overseas securities offerings and published a series of laws and regulations to regulate such transactions. See “Item 3. Key Information—Recent Regulatory Development” for more information about these new laws and regulations. While we believe, to the best of our knowledge, that our and the VIEs’ business operations do not violate any of the PRC laws and regulations currently in force in all material respects, we cannot guarantee that new rules or regulations promulgated in the future will not impose any additional requirement on us or otherwise tightening the regulations on companies with a VIE structure. If the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies determine that prior approval is required for any of our offerings of securities overseas or maintenance of the listing status of the ADSs, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such approval in a timely manner, or at all. The CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies also may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, not to proceed with such offering or maintain the listing status of our ADSs. If we proceed with any of such offering or maintain the listing status of our ADSs without obtaining the CSRC’s or other PRC regulatory agencies’ approval to the extent it is required, or if we are unable to comply with any new approval requirements which might be adopted for offerings that we have completed, we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our and the VIEs’ operations in China, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of China or accept foreign investments, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from offering of securities overseas into China or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs. See “Item 3. Key Information—Recent Regulatory Development” starting from page 5 of this annual report, and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—The approval, filing or other requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC government authorities may be required under PRC law in connection with our issuance of securities overseas or maintenance of the listing status of our ADSs, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing or other requirements” on page 39 of this annual report. We conduct our business primarily through our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs and their subsidiaries in China. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. The PRC government has significant oversight and discretion over the operation of our and the VIEs’ business, and it may intervene or influence our and the VIEs’ operations at any time, which could result in a material adverse change in our and the VIEs’ operation and the value of our ADSs. See “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The PRC government may intervene or influence our and the VIEs’ operations at any time, or may exert more control over our future overseas offerings or foreign investments in us, which could result in a material change in our and the VIEs’ operation and the value of our ADSs” on page 46 of this annual report.

You should carefully consider all of the information in this annual report before making an investment in the ADSs. Below please find a summary of the principal risks and uncertainties we face, organized under relevant headings. In particular, as we are a China-based company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, you should pay special attention to subsections headed “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure.”

3.A. [Reserved]

3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

3.C. Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

3.D. Risk Factors

Below please find a summary of the principal risks we face, organized under relevant headings. Unless otherwise indicated, all the legal and operational risks associated with being based in and having operations in the PRC also apply to operations in Hong Kong.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Risks and uncertainties related to our business and industry include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to Our Relationship with NetEase

Risks and uncertainties related to our relationship with NetEase include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Risks and uncertainties related to our corporate structure include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

We are also subject to risks and uncertainties related to doing business in China include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs

In addition to the risks described above, we are subject to risks related to our Class A ordinary shares and our ADSs, including, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have a limited history in operating certain of our products and services. This may make it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and uncertainties associated with these products and services.

We have a limited history in operating certain of our major products and services. For example, as part of our efforts to consolidate our position as an AI solutions provider specializing in learning and advertising, we introduced a series of new product and service offerings, including Youdao Dictionary Pen X7 Pro, as well as Youdao Space X, a brand-new tutoring pen, in 2025. These new product and service offerings are still in their initial stages of development and have not generated significant revenues and there is no guarantee that they may become key growth drivers of our company in the future. Our limited history may make it difficult for us to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and uncertainties associated with new products and services, and our historical performance may not be indicative of our future prospects and operating results.

Managing a growing portfolio of new products and services involve significant challenges and risks, including those relating to our ability to:

If we are unable to successfully address these risks and uncertainties, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to develop and apply our technologies to support and expand our product and service offerings or if we fail to timely respond to the rapid changes in industry trends and users’ preference, we may lose market share and our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We believe our technologies are critical to our business, particularly as we strive to make significant business transitions from an online education company focused on K12 sectors to a technology-focused intelligent learning company serving the broader education industry. Over the years, we have developed a number of core technologies to support our comprehensive suite of products and services. For example, we launched our large language model (LLM), Confucius, in 2023, which is China’s first LLM specifically for education sector. We also introduced a series of AI-based learning tools that feature AI-based technologies to facilitate personalized and efficient learning. However, the technology development activities, especially the AI-related technologies, are inherently uncertain, and there is no assurance that we will continue to achieve technological breakthroughs, deliver advanced technologies and functions, and successfully apply these outcomes into our products and service offerings. Furthermore, the AI technologies are characterized by rapid technological changes and evolving industry trends, which are difficult to predict. If we fail to keep up with the latest technological development and industry trends, we may suffer a decline in demand for our products and services as well as our competitive position.

We also rely on technologies to build and maintain our IT infrastructure. The intelligent learning industry is subject to rapid technological changes and innovations and is affected by unpredictable product lifecycles and user preferences. Our technologies may become obsolete or insufficient, and we may have difficulties in following and adapting to technological changes in the intelligent learning industry in a timely and cost-effective manner. New technologies and solutions developed and introduced by our competitors could render our offerings less attractive or obsolete thus materially affecting our business and prospects. In addition, our substantial investments in technology may not produce expected results. If we fail to continue to develop, innovate and utilize our technologies or if our competitors develop or apply more advanced technologies, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be effective in broadening our monetization channels.

We plan to explore additional opportunities to monetize our user base, content and technologies by, for example, offering additional technology solutions to our existing business customers, provide innovative services and solutions to our new customers, users and/or business partner in response to their evolving business needs, and providing additional subscription options to users to increase their spending with us. If these efforts fail to achieve our anticipated results, we may not be able to increase or maintain our revenue growth. Specifically, in order to increase the number of our users and their levels of engagement and spending, we will need to address a number of challenges, including providing consistently high-quality and effective learning content, products and services; continuing to innovate and stay ahead of our competitors; and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of our sales and marketing efforts. If we fail to address any of these challenges, especially if we fail to offer high-quality learning content, products and services to meet user preferences and demands, we may not be successful in increasing the number of our users and increasing their spending, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The changes in our business strategies and offerings may make it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.

We historically generated a significant portion of our revenue from the Academic AST Business. In 2021, the net revenues from our Academic AST Business accounted for approximately 25.0% of our net revenues. In order to fully comply with applicable PRC regulatory requirements adopted by the PRC government in the second half of 2021, we disposed of the Academic AST Business and has not generate revenue from such business since then. We completed transition to become an AI solutions provider specializing in learning and advertising and have developed a comprehensive suite of product and service offerings. We recently introduced a number of new intelligent learning products, such as Youdao Dictionary Pen X7 Pro and Youdao Space X.

The significant changes in our business strategies and offerings not only rendered our historical results no longer indicative of our future performance, they may also have some or all of the following unintended effects:

If we are unable to successfully address these risks and uncertainties, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and the implementation measures issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially and adversely affected and may continue to affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect.

The PRC private education industry, especially the after-school tutoring sector, has experienced intense scrutiny and has been subject to significant regulatory changes recently that had materially and adversely impacted businesses in such industry. In particular, the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education jointly promulgated by the General Office of State Council and the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on July 24, 2021, or the Alleviating Burden Opinion, sets out a series of operating requirements on after-school tutoring institutions, including, among other things, a prohibition on the approval of new academic after-school tutoring institutions in compulsory education, or the Academic AST Institutions; a mandate that all the existing Academic AST Institutions be registered as non-profit institutions; mandatory re-approval for education apps, a ban on the capitalization and foreign participation of Academic AST Institutions, strengthened regulatory oversight of the pre-collection and approval requirements for non-academic tutoring. To implement the Alleviating Burden Opinion, in September 2021, the Chinese Ministry of Education, or the MOE, together with other government authorities, issued a circular requiring all Academic AST Institutions to complete registration as non-profit by the end of 2021 and a circular requiring all online after-school tutoring institutions that have filed with the local education administration authorities providing tutoring services on academic subjects to obtain the private school operating permit by the end of 2021. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Private Education—Regulations Related to After-school Tutoring and Educational Apps” for more details.

Our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect have been and may continue to be materially and adversely affected by the actions we have taken to date and may be required to take in the future in compliance with the Alleviating Burden Opinion and its implementation measures. We are closely monitoring the evolving regulatory environment and are making efforts to seek guidance from and cooperate with the government authorities to comply with the Alleviating Burden Opinion and its implementation measures. As of the date of this annual report, we no longer offer AST courses on academic subjects for students receiving compulsory education and for high-school students. With respect to our non-academic after school tutoring services, it is provided in the Alleviating Burden Opinion that local authorities shall identify corresponding competent authorities for different tutoring categories and set forth standards by categories to approve relevant non-academic tutoring institutions. We follow internal guidelines to make necessary registrations and filings, except as would not have a material adverse effect on our business, and will use our commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, maintain and renew necessary licenses and permits on a timely basis. However, we may not be able to obtain and maintain all requisite licenses, permits, approvals and filings or pass all requisite assessments in a timely manner or at all.

The State Council promulgated the Amended Implementation Rules for the Private Education Law, or the Amended Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021, which provides, among others, that a private school engaging in online education activities using internet technology shall obtain the relevant private school operating permit. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Private Education—The Law for Promoting Private Education and its Implementing Rules.” Further, the PRC government authorities have issued several regulations aiming to strengthen its regulation of after-school tutoring institutions, including without limitation the Opinions on Guiding and Regulating the Orderly and Healthy Development of Educational Mobile Apps, or the Opinions on Educational Apps, the Administrative Measures for After-School Tutoring Materials for Primary and Secondary School Students (for Trial Implementation) and the Administrative Measures for Practitioners of the After-School Tutoring Institutions (for Trial Implementation). The MOE jointly with other government authorities promulgated the Notice on Regulating Non-Academic After-school Training Institutions and the Opinions on Standardizing Non-Academic After-School Tutoring for Primary and Secondary School Students respectively on March 3, 2022 and December 8, 2022, which impose certain compliance requirements on non-academic after school tutoring institutions. The MOE issued the Provisional Measures on Administrative Penalties for After-School Tutoring effective from October 15, 2023, which clarify various non-complaint activities of after-school tutoring institutions and stipulate corresponding penalties. For more details and other regulations of after-school tutoring institutions, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Private Education—Regulations Related to After-School Tutoring and Educational Apps.”

Certain aspects of our existing tutoring services may be deemed to not be in full compliance with the above-mentioned laws and regulations regarding after-school tutoring services. The relevant governmental authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing, and may from time to time conduct inspections on compliance with, such laws and regulations and their related local rules. We have been making and will continue to make efforts to comply with such regulations as well as requirements by relevant governmental authorities during such inspections. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with such regulations and requirements in a timely manner, or at all. If we fail to comply with these regulations and requirements, we may be subject to fines, regulatory orders to suspend our and the VIEs’ operations or other regulatory and disciplinary sanctions, which may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations.

In addition, we cannot assure you whether and how the PRC government would promulgate additional laws, regulations and guidance regarding the private education industry, including those promulgated to apply more stringent social and ethical standards in the education sector in general, and there is no assurance that we can comply with any such newly promulgated laws and regulations in a timely manner or at all. Failure to regain compliance may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations. For more details of the relevant laws and regulations, please refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Private Education.”

The success and future growth of our business will be affected by the user acceptance and market trend of integration of technology and learning.

We operate in the intelligent learning industry, and our business model features integrating technology closely with learning to provide a more efficient and engaging learning experience. However, intelligent learning remains a relatively new concept in China, and there are limited proven methods to project user demand or preference or available industry standards on which we can rely. In addition, even with the proliferation of internet and mobile devices in China, we believe that some of our target students may still be inclined to choose traditional, face-to-face courses over online courses as they find the former more intimate and reliable. We cannot assure you that our products and services will continue to be attractive to our users in the future. If our smart devices and services become less appealing to our users, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be able to improve or expand our product and service offerings in a timely and cost-effective manner.

We regularly and constantly update our existing product and service offerings and develop new products, services and content to meet our users’ demands and the evolving market trends. New products, services and contents may not be accepted by our users as we expect, and we may not be able to introduce them as quickly as our competitors introduce competing offerings. The development of new products, services and content could be costly and time-consuming and requires us to make significant investments in research and product development, develop new technologies, and increase sales and marketing efforts, all of which may not be successful. If we are unsuccessful in improving or expanding our product and service offerings due to financial constraints, failure to attract qualified personnel or other reasons, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

We incurred net losses in the past and may not be able to maintain and improve profitability as expected.

We had net loss of RMB550.1 million 2023 and achieved profitability in 2024 and 2025, with net income of RMB75.2 million and RMB97.0 million (US$13.9 million), respectively. We plan to continue to maintain and improve our profitability going forward. However, such plans may not develop as timely and to the extend as expected, in which case may not maintain and improve profitability as planned or at all. In addition, we intend to invest heavily in R&D, product development, as well as sales and marketing efforts. These investments are expected to cause our operating expenses to increase rapidly, including rapid increases in absolute amounts and as a percentage of revenue in the near future, which may result in net losses in the near term. These efforts may be more costly than we expect and our net revenues may not increase sufficiently to offset the expenses. We may continue to take actions and make investments that do not generate optimal financial results and may even result in significantly increased operating losses in the short term with no assurance that we will maintain and improve our profitability. These factors may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business depends on the continued success of our brand, and if we fail to maintain and enhance recognition of our brand, our reputation and operating results may be harmed.

We believe that market awareness of our “Youdao” brand has contributed significantly to our success. Maintaining and enhancing our brand are critical to our efforts to scale our business and attract and retain users. Failure to maintain and enhance our brand recognition could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have devoted significant resources to maintaining and promoting our brand, but we cannot assure you that these efforts will be successful. If we are unable to further enhance our brand recognition, or if our brand image is negatively impacted by any negative publicity, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. We may also be negatively impacted by negative publicity associated with NetEase or any member of the NetEase Group; see also “—Any negative development in NetEase’s market position, brand recognition or financial condition may materially and adversely affect us.”

We require a significant amount of capital to fund our operations and respond to business opportunities. If we cannot obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms, or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We may make investments from time to time in content and product development, technologies, branding, sales and marketing to remain competitive. In the past, our principal sources of liquidity included cash from our business operations, loans from the NetEase Group and the proceeds received from the issuance and sale of our ordinary or preferred shares. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—7.B. Related Party Transactions.” To the extent we need to raise additional capital to fund our operations and respond to business opportunities, we may not be able to do so on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Such financings may be on terms that are dilutive or potentially dilutive to our shareholders, and the prices at which new investors would be willing to purchase our securities may be lower than the current market price per share of our ordinary shares. The holders of new securities may also have rights, preferences, or privileges that are senior to those of existing stockholders. Furthermore, deterioration in global economic conditions or escalation of geopolitical tensions in various regions of the world may adversely impact our ability to secure additional financing. If new financing sources are required, but are insufficient or unavailable, we may need to modify our growth and operating plans and business strategies based on available funding, if any, which would harm our ability to grow our business.

We have significant working capital requirements and have historically experienced working capital deficits. If we continue to experience working capital deficits in the future, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

As a result of changes in our funding position and operating assets and liabilities, we had working capital deficits (being total current liabilities exceeded that of total current assets) of RMB1,460.2 million and RMB1,212.4 million (US$173.4 million) as of December 31, 2024 and 2025, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, we had outstanding interest-bearing short-term loan payable to the NetEase Group in the amount of RMB878.0 million (US$125.6 million), representing approximately 29.9% of our current liabilities. The loan is repayable within one year and was advanced to us by the NetEase Group to provide working capital for our business operations. According to the support letter issued by the NetEase Group in May 2024, the NetEase Group intends to provide financial support for our continuing operations in the period no less than twelve months from April 15, 2025. In April 2021, we entered into a three-year US$300.0 million revolving loan facility agreement with NetEase with maturity dated March 31, 2024. In September 2023, we and NetEase entered into an agreement to further extend such revolving loan facility agreement to March 31, 2027. As of the date of this annual report, we and NetEase have both approved an extension of the maturity date of the loan facility, including the loans already drawn under it, to March 31, 2030. As of March 31, 2026, we had outstanding interest-bearing long-term loans payable to the NetEase Group in the amount of US$117.1 million (or equivalent to RMB814.9 million), which were drawn down from the above-mentioned facility provided by NetEase. Despite the foregoing agreements, if we are required by NetEase to repay these loans, our liquidity, financial position and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.

There is no assurance that we will generate sufficient net income or operating cash flows to meet our working capital requirements and repay our liabilities as they become due, due to a variety of factors. For actions that we plan to take in order to address our working capital deficit, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.” There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully take any of these actions in a timely manner, including prudently managing our working capital, or raising additional equity or debt financing on terms that are acceptable to us, particularly in a challenging regulatory environment. Our inability to take these actions as and when necessary could materially adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and ability to operate.

We face risks associated with our long-term and short-term investments.

We currently invest a portion of our capital in long-term and short-term investments. As of December 31, 2025, our long-term investments consisted mainly of equity investments in privately-held companies and limited-partnerships, and our short-term investments consisted mainly of financial products issued by commercial banks in China with a variable interest rate indexed to the performance of underlying assets and a maturity date within one year when purchased. These investments may earn yields substantially lower than anticipated, and the fair values of our investments could fluctuate significantly, due to uncertainties in valuation, among other factors. Any failure to realize the benefits we expected from these investments or significant fluctuations in the fair value of these investments may materially and adversely affect our business and financial results. Impairment losses on long-term investments of RMB43.7 million, nil and RMB25.7 million (US$3.7 million) were recognized in 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively.

If we fail to retain existing or attract new advertising customers, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We generated net revenues of RMB1,331.9 million, RMB1,975.0 million and RMB2,538.8 million (US$363.0 million) in 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, from online marketing services. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our advertising customers in the future, attract new advertising customers continuously or be able to retain our advertising customers at all. If our advertising customers find that they can generate better returns elsewhere, or if our competitors provide better advertising services to suit our advertising customers’ goals, we may lose our advertising customers. In addition, third parties may develop and use certain technologies to block the display of our advertising customers’ advertisements on our platform, which may in turn cause us to lose advertising customers and adversely affect our results of operations. Since many of our advertising customers are not bound by long-term contracts, they may lessen or discontinue advertising arrangements with us easily without incurring material liabilities. Failure to retain existing advertising customers or attract new advertising customers may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a significant portion of our brand advertising customers have entered into advertising agreements with us through various third-party advertising agencies. As a result, we rely on third-party advertising agencies for sales to, and collection of payment from, our brand advertisers. The financial soundness of our advertising customers and advertising agencies may affect our collection of accounts receivable.

Any failure to engage and maintain strong relationships with influencers, or their ineffective marketing and promotion, could diminish the appeal of our online marketing services.

We leverage our extensive database of global influencers and advanced technologies, such as LLMs and image recognition, to develop the key opinion leader (“KOL”) marketing. Therefore, our ability to engage and maintain strong relationships with these influencers is critical to the growth and long-term success of our online marketing services. However, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in attracting, cultivating, or retaining our influencers. Competition for the attention of influencers is intense, and our ability to engage them effectively may be limited by factors such as competition from larger platforms, changing influencer preferences, or our own resource constraints.

We also utilize a series of AI technologies, such as LLMs and image recognition, to analyze the trends in influencer videos, evaluate the KOL video conversion effectiveness, as well as drive high conversion rates. However, there is no assurance that the influencers’ marketing and promotion will be effective. Influencer marketing campaigns are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including influencer credibility and compatibility, audience receptiveness, and the quality of promotional content. We may not always be able to identify, cultivate and match the suitable influencers to promote our clients’ business, if at all. If influencers fail to resonate with their audience, the effectiveness of their marketing efforts may be compromised. Any of these events could result in dissatisfaction from our clients, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Divestitures of businesses and assets may have a material and adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We have undertaken, and may undertake in the future, divestitures or other disposal transactions in connection with certain of our businesses and assets. In order to fully comply with applicable PRC regulatory requirements adopted by the PRC government in the second half of 2021, we disposed of the Academic AST Business. These decisions are largely based on our management’s assessment of the business models and likelihood of success of these businesses as well as our responses to changes in the regulatory requirements. However, our judgment could be inaccurate, and we may not achieve the desired strategic and financial benefits from these transactions. Our financial results could be adversely affected by the impact from the loss of earnings associated with divested businesses. These factors may make it difficult for investors and analysts to predict our future earnings potential based on our historical financial performance.

We may also be exposed to negative publicity as a result of the potential misconception that the divested business is still part of our consolidated group, particularly if such divested business is subject to substantial regulatory risks. On the other hand, we cannot assure you that the divesting business would not pursue opportunities to provide services to our competitors or other opportunities that would conflict with our interests. If any conflicts of interest that may arise between the divesting business and us cannot be resolved in our favor, our business, financial condition, results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Furthermore, reducing or eliminating our ownership interests in these businesses might negatively affect our operations, prospects, or long-term value. We may lose access to resources or know-how that would have been useful in the development of our own business. Our ability to diversify or expand our existing businesses or to move into new areas of business may be reduced, and we may have to modify our business strategy to focus more exclusively on areas of business where we already possess the necessary expertise. We may sell our interests too early, and thus forego gains that we otherwise would have received had we not sold. Selecting businesses to dispose of, finding buyers for them and negotiating prices for what may be relatively illiquid ownership interests with no easily ascertainable fair market value will also require significant attention from our management and may divert resources from our existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our business operations.

We face intense competitions, which could lead to pricing pressure and loss of market share and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in the competitive intelligent learning industry and are faced with intense competition in every aspect of our business, including competition for users, user enrollments, technology and talents. For example, we face competition for our tutoring service offerings from online and offline providers of courses and educational content. We also face competition for our knowledge tools from providers of online dictionary and translation solutions and for our smart device offerings from manufacturers of smart hardware or devices. We also compete with advertisers and their budgets, not only with internet companies, but also with other types of advertising media, such as newspapers, magazines, and television. Some of our current and future competitors may have greater brand recognition and financial and other resources than we do, which may make it harder for us to maintain or gain market share. If we are not able to effectively compete against current or future competitors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. Increased competition may result in pricing pressure, reducing our ability to charge higher prices for our products and services. The increasingly competitive landscape may also result in longer and more complex sales cycles with a prospective paying user and cause us to lose market share to our competitors, any of which could materially and negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Users may decide not to use our products and services for a number of reasons, including a perceived lack of improvement in their academic performance or general dissatisfaction with our offerings, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The success of our business depends on our ability to deliver high-quality learning experiences and help users achieve their learning objectives. We may not always be able to meet our users’ expectations due to a variety of reasons, many of which are outside of our control. We may face increased user dissatisfaction due to our users’ perceptions of our failure to help them achieve their anticipated goals, their overall dissatisfaction with the quality of our offerings. These factors may contribute to reduced user engagement and increased challenges in attracting prospective users, all of which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, our brand and business may suffer.

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and contractual restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. Although we seek to obtain copyright, patent or other appropriate protection for our intellectual property when applicable, it is possible that we may not be able to do so successfully or that the protections we have obtained may not be sufficient to protect all of our intellectual property rights. In particular, we primarily rely on our learning content developed in-house to provide high-quality intelligent learning services. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary education content and other intellectual property rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or duplicate our intellectual property or otherwise use our intellectual properties without obtaining our consent. Monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult and costly, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will effectively prevent misappropriation of our intellectual properties. If we are not successful in protecting our intellectual property rights, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We may from time to time be subject to infringement claims relating to intellectual properties of third parties.

We cannot assure you that our content, product and service offerings or our technologies do not or will not infringe upon copyrights or other intellectual property rights (including but not limited to trademarks, patents, know-how) held by third parties. We may encounter disputes from time to time over rights and obligations concerning intellectual properties, and we may not prevail in those disputes.

We have adopted policies and procedures to prohibit our users, employees and business partners from infringing upon third-party copyright or other intellectual property rights. However, we cannot assure you that they will not, against our policies, use third-party copyrighted materials or intellectual property without proper authorization in our tutoring services or via any medium through which we provide our services. To the extent that our users, employees and business partners use intellectual property rights or copyrights owned by others, disputes may arise as to the rights in related know-how and inventions and other proprietary assets. In addition, we may incur liability for unauthorized duplication or distribution of materials used in our tutoring services. Although we have set up rules and procedures to enable copyright owners to provide us with notice of alleged infringement, given the volume of content available that we offer, it is not possible for us to identify and remove or disable all potentially infringing content that may exist, and we may encounter intellectual property claims. If any third-party infringement claims are brought against us, we may be forced to divert management’s time and other resources from our business and operations to defend against these claims, or may be prohibited from using such intellectual property or relevant contents, and we may incur licensing or usage fees or be forced to develop alternatives of our own. As a result, our reputation may be harmed and our business and financial performance may be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be able to maintain or increase our tuition levels.

Our results of operations are affected by the pricing of our tutoring service offerings. We determine the tuition for our tutoring services primarily based on the market demand for our course offerings, the cost of our operations, the pricing charged by our competitors, and the general economic conditions, among other things. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain or increase our tuition level in the future without adversely affecting the demand for our tutoring service offerings.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, which makes our results of operations difficult to predict and may cause our quarterly results of operations to fall short of expectations.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may continue to fluctuate depending on a number of factors, many of which are out of our control. Our operating results tend to be seasonal. For example, we tend to experience strong sale of our smart devices in the third quarter as a result of the commencement of school term in September. For these reasons, comparing our operating results on a consecutive quarter-over-quarter basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Our quarterly and annual net revenues and costs and expenses as a percentage of our revenues in a given period may be significantly different from our historical or projected rates and our operating results in future quarters may fall below expectations.

If we are unable to manage our growth or execute our strategies effectively, our business and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business has grown substantially in recent years, and we expect to continue to drive the growth of our business in the future. However, our historical performance may not be indicative of our future growth or financial results. We cannot assure you that we will be able to manage our growth at the same rate as we did in the past, or avoid any decline in the future. In addition, as we continue to diversify our product and service offerings, we will need to continuously enhance and upgrade our technology, optimize our branding, sales and marketing efforts, and expand, train and manage our faculty members and R&D personnel. All these efforts will require significant managerial, financial and human resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively manage our growth, that our current technology, infrastructure and operation capabilities will be adequate and successful to support our expanding operations, or that our strategies and new business initiatives will be executed successfully. If we are not able to manage our growth or execute our strategies effectively, our expansion may not be successful and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Any significant disruption in our technology infrastructure or our failure to maintain the satisfactory performance, security and integrity of our technology infrastructure would reduce visitor traffic and may materially and adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.

The proper functioning of our technology infrastructure is essential to our business. We heavily rely on our technology infrastructure to operate our business. We may encounter problems when upgrading our technology infrastructure including our online platform, mobile apps, systems and software. The development, upgrades and implementation of our technology infrastructure are complex processes. Issues not identified during pre-launch testing of new services may only become evident when such services are made available to our entire customer base. Therefore, our technology infrastructure may not function properly if we fail to detect or solve technical errors in a timely manner. In addition, our systems are potentially vulnerable to damage or interruption as a result of natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality issues, environmental conditions, computer viruses or attempts to harm our systems, criminal acts and similar events. These and other events may lead to the unavailability of the interruption of tutoring service delivery, the availability of our tools and services and apps, or other events which would affect our operations. If we experience frequent or persistent service disruptions, our reputation may be damaged and our users may switch to our competitors, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Refunds or potential refund disputes of our tuition fees may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The refund policy of our tutoring services is based on a number of factors, including the total length of the course, whether the course has started when the refund request is made, among other things. For more information, see “Item 4. Information of the Company—4.B. Business Overview—How We Generate Revenues—Tuition fees.” The number of refund requests and the amount of refunds could be affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, without limitation to, student dissatisfaction with the quality of our tutoring service offerings, a perceived decline in our faculty’s teaching quality due to the departure of popular instructors, privacy concerns relating to our products and services, negative publicity regarding us or tutoring service providers in general, and any change or development in PRC laws and regulations with respect to fees and tuitions charged by tutoring services providers like us. Any refund payments that we may be required to make to our users, as well as the expenses we could incur for processing refunds and resolving refund disputes, could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. A high volume of refunds and refund disputes may also generate negative publicity that could harm our reputation.

A significant interruption in the operations of our suppliers for smart devices could potentially affect our operations and any material misconduct or disputes against our suppliers could potentially harm our business and reputation.

Certain of our suppliers for smart devices are subject to various regulations and are required to obtain and maintain various qualifications, government licenses and approvals. If any of these suppliers loses its qualification or eligibility because of its failure to comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to find alternative suppliers in a timely manner or at all. Moreover, general economic conditions could also adversely affect the financial viability of our suppliers, resulting in their inability to provide raw materials and/or services used in our operations. A significant interruption in the operations of our suppliers could potentially affect our operations and any material misconduct or disputes against our suppliers could potentially harm our business and reputation.

In addition, suppliers may fail to supply raw materials and/or services that meet our quality standards. If we are unable to identify alternative materials or suppliers and secure approval for their use in a timely manner, our business, operations and the development of new products and/or services could be harmed. Any change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to product performance or incorporate unique technology, and the loss of any existing supply contract could have a material adverse effect on us.

The AI industry faces changing laws and regulations, significant upfront investments and commercialization uncertainties. Integrating AI into our products and service offerings could lead to potential infringement claims and higher costs for regulatory compliance.

We are incorporating AI into various parts of our product and service offerings. For instance, in 2023, we launched our own LLM, Confucius, and unveiled a suite of AI-driven tools underpinned by Confucius’s capabilities. As with most emerging technologies, AI comes with its own set of uncertainties, risks and challenges that could affect its adoption and our business. AI algorithms may be flawed, and the data used could be incomplete or biased. Inappropriate or controversial data practices, by us or by others, could limit the acceptance of our AI-enhanced products and content. Certain AI applications could trigger ethical issues. Should our AI-based offerings become controversial due to their effects on human rights, privacy, employment, or other social matters, we risk reputational harm or legal repercussions. While the generative AI technology has the potential to streamline content creation processes and reduce costs, there may be significant upfront investments required for businesses to integrate generative AI into our products and service offerings. Also, uncertainty exists with respect to the economic feasibility of commercializing generative AI. Although generative AI holds much promise for commercial applications, there still exists substantial uncertainties, such as quality and reliability of outputs, customer acceptance and clear industry standards, which need to be addressed before widespread adoption.

Additionally, there are uncertainties around the ownership and intellectual property protection of AI generated content, or AIGC. Using AIGC tools could also lead to potential intellectual property infringement and other legal issues. If we are unable to obtain any needed authorization or licenses for using AIGC tools, whether due to failure to identify the rights holder or any other reason, we might infringe on others’ rights and encounter claims. Such third-party infringement claims might lead to monetary claims, increasing licensing or usage fees or less content for our users.

The regulatory and legal framework on generative AI is constantly evolving. On November 25, 2022, the CAC, the MIIT and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the Administrative Provisions on Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services, which became effective on January 10, 2023. According to these Provisions, no organization or individual may use deep synthesis services to produce, reproduce, release or disseminate information prohibited by laws and administrative regulations, or to engage in activities that endanger national security and interests, damage the national image, infringe upon social public interests, disrupt the economic and social order or undermine the legitimate rights and interests of others. Additionally, the providers of deep synthesis services shall, among other things, establish and maintain management systems for algorithmic mechanism review, data security and personal information protection. On July 10, 2023, the CAC published the Provisional Administrative Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services, which took effect on August 15, 2023. These Measures provide, among others, that any providers of generative AI products with public opinion attributes or social mobilization capabilities shall conduct security assessment in accordance with relevant regulations, and complete the filing procedures in accordance with the Administrative Provisions on Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation. On March 14, 2025, the CAC released the Measures for Labeling Artificial Intelligence Generated Synthetic Contents, effective on September 1, 2025. According to these measures, network information service providers shall label the AI-generated synthetic content to inform the users that the content is AI-generated. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Generative AI” for details on regulations over Generative AI in the PRC. However, since these laws and regulations are still relatively new and significant uncertainties remain with respect to their interpretation and implementation, we cannot assure you whether we will be able to comply with the requirements of such laws and regulations in a timely manner or at all. If we are unable to complete all necessary filings and/or assessments, or to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or if we have any dispute with any third party relating to intellectual property or data security, our reputation, business operation and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

The regulatory framework in relation to the development and use of emerging AI technologies outside of PRC is also rapidly evolving, many foreign government bodies, states or agencies have introduced or are currently considering adding laws and regulations related to the development and integration of AI. In the U.S., AI technologies have been the subject of executive orders. In the meantime, legislation has also been promulgated at the state level. For example, State of California of the U.S. has enacted several new laws in 2024 which further regulate the use of AI technologies, such as the California AI Transparency Act, which required that covered AI providers shall give users the option to include a manifest disclosure to identify the content as AI-generated content. Other states have also passed AI-focused legislation, such as Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which will require developers and deployers of “high-risk” AI systems to implement certain safeguards against algorithmic discrimination. In Europe, on August 1, 2024, the European Artificial Intelligence Act, or the EU AI Act, entered into force, which established a comprehensive framework for AI in the EU market. The EU AI Act applies to companies that develop, use and /or provide AI in the EU and includes requirements around transparency, conformity assessment and monitoring, risk assessments, etc., and propose fines for breach of up to EUR 35 million or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover in the preceding financial year for prohibited practices, whichever is higher. Besides the EU and U.S., other jurisdictions are also developing AI regulations and this area will continue to be a focus for regulators globally. The regulation on AI providers could affect our use of AI and our ability to provide and to improve our AI-related services, since additional compliance measures and changes to our operations will be continuously required in this area.

Issues related to the responsible use of our technologies, including AI in our offerings, could result in reputational damage, financial harm, or legal liability.

Concerns relating to the responsible development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence enabled by AI computing chips and related hardware-software systems, including those used in connection with our product or services, may result in reputational or financial harm and potential legal liability, and may cause us to incur significant costs to address such concerns. AI technologies involve emerging and evolving legal, social, ethical and policy issues and present risks and challenges that could affect their adoption and, in turn, demand for our products and/or services. If AI systems built or deployed in our products and services are alleged to have unintended harmful consequences, infringed intellectual property rights, violated data protection or privacy laws, or caused controversy in relation to human rights, employment displacement, algorithmic bias, public security or other societal issues, our brand, reputation and commercial relationships could be adversely affected, even if such systems are developed, implemented or operated by third parties and not by us. In addition, we may be required to continuously establish and refine internal governance policies, risk management frameworks, technical safeguards and compliance procedures relating to the responsible design, testing and commercialization of AI-enabling infrastructure. If such internal governance framework is perceived as insufficient, or if we fail to adequately assess and mitigate AI-related risks across our product lifecycle and sales channels, we may be subject to regulatory inquiries, administrative penalties, civil claims or contractual liability, and may suffer brand or reputational damage. Any failure by us or by the broader industry to adequately address concerns relating to the responsible use of AI could undermine public confidence in artificial intelligence more generally, slow the adoption of AI technologies, and adversely affect demand for our products and/or services.

Failure to maintain optimal inventory levels could increase our inventory holding costs or cause us to lose sales.

Maintaining optimal inventory levels is critical to our financial health. As of December 31, 2024 and 2025, the balance of our inventory accounted for approximately 11.8% and 8.2%, respectively, of our total current assets. We are exposed to inventory risks as a result of a variety of factors beyond our control, including changing consumption trends and preferences and launches of competing products. Moreover, for stocking purposes, we generally forecast demand for the products we sell ahead of the actual time of sale. We cannot assure you that we can accurately predict these trends and events and maintain adequate levels of inventory at all times. An unexpected decrease in the market demand for the products we sell could lead to excessive or obsolescent inventory, and we may write down the cost of our inventories to the estimated net realizable value due to slow-moving merchandise and damaged goods, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. On the other hand, inventory under-stock may cause us to lose sales and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may also be materially and adversely affected.

We may be adversely affected by any negative publicity concerning us and our business, shareholders, affiliates, directors, officers, instructors, teaching assistants and other employees, business partners, and the industry in which we operate, regardless of its accuracy, that could harm our reputation and business.

Negative publicity about us and our business, shareholders, affiliates, directors, officers, instructors, teaching assistants and other employees, business partners, as well as the industry in which we operate, can harm our brand and reputation. Negative publicity concerning these parties could be related to a wide variety of matters, including, but are not limited to:

See also “—Any negative development in NetEase’s market position, brand recognition or financial condition may materially and adversely affect us.”

In addition to traditional media, there has been an increasing use of social media platforms and similar devices in China, including instant messaging applications, social media websites and other forms of internet-based communications that provide individuals with access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. The availability of information on instant messaging applications and social media platforms is virtually immediate as is its impact without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. The opportunity for dissemination of information, including inaccurate information, is seemingly limitless and readily available. Information concerning our company, shareholders, directors, officers, instructors, teaching assistants and other employees may be posted on such platforms at any time. The risks associated with any such negative publicity or incorrect information cannot be completely eliminated or mitigated and may materially harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our reputation and business may be adversely impacted by our users’ and employees’ misconduct, improper activities and misuse of our content, products and services, many of which are beyond our control.

Our courses undergo multiple rounds of internal review before being broadly released. We regularly and actively monitor our live courses and other content and communications to ensure that we are able to identify content that may be deemed inappropriate or violation of laws, regulations and government policies. When any inappropriate or illegal content is identified, we promptly remove the content. However, since we have limited control over the real-time and offline behavior of our users, instructors and teaching assistants, to the extent any improper behavior is associated with our content, products and services, our ability to protect our reputation may be limited. In addition, if any of our users, instructors and teaching assistants suffer or allege to have suffered harm following contact initiated through our products and services, we may face civil lawsuits or other liabilities. In response to allegations of illegal or inappropriate activities, PRC government authorities may intervene and hold us liable for non-compliance with PRC laws and regulations concerning the dissemination of information on the internet and subject us to administrative penalties or other sanctions, such as requiring us to restrict or discontinue our content, products or services. As a result, our business may suffer and our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We are also exposed to the risk of other types of employee fraud or other misconduct. Other types of employee misconduct include intentionally failing to comply with government regulations, engaging in unauthorized activities and misrepresentation to our prospective users during sales and marketing activities, which could harm our reputation. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We cannot assure you that we will not be subject to liability claims or legal or regulatory liability for any inappropriate or illegal content, which could subject us to liabilities and cause damages to our reputation.

Although we implement various monitoring procedures to identify and remove inappropriate or illegal content, we cannot assure you that there will be no inappropriate or illegal content included in our content offerings. Our content offerings include not only content we develop in-house, such as our proprietary quiz banks, but also content generated by our users. We may face civil, administrative or criminal liability or legal or regulatory sanctions, such as requiring us to restrict or discontinue our content, products or services, if an individual or corporate, governmental or other entity believes that any of the content offerings violates any laws, regulations or governmental policies or infringes upon its legal rights. Even if such a claim were not successful, defending such a claim may cause us to incur substantial costs. Moreover, any accusation of inappropriate or illegal content in our content offerings could lead to significant negative publicity, which could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Privacy concerns or security breaches relating to our platform could result in economic loss, damage our reputation, deter users from using our products, and expose us to legal penalties and liability.

We collect, process, and store significant amounts of data concerning our users, business partners and employees, including personal and transaction data involving our users. While we have taken reasonable steps to protect such data, there is no guarantee that such steps will be successful. Techniques used to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems, are constantly evolving, and we may be unable to anticipate, deter, or prevent such techniques or otherwise implement adequate preventative measures to avoid unauthorized access to such data or our systems.

Like all internet services, our service is vulnerable to software bugs, computer viruses, internet worms, break-ins, phishing attacks, attempts to overload servers with denial-of-service, and similar attacks and disruptions from the unauthorized use of our and third-party computer systems, any of which could lead to system interruptions, delays, or shut-downs and cause the loss of critical data or the unauthorized access to our data or our users’ data. Computer malware, viruses, and computer hacking and phishing attacks have become more prevalent in our industry. Any functions that we use to facilitate interactivity with other internet platforms have the potential to increase the scope of access that hackers may have to our user accounts. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, our failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may harm our reputation and ability to retain existing users and attract new users. Although we have in place systems and processes that are designed to protect our and our users’ data, we cannot assure you that such measures will provide absolute security. We may incur significant costs in protecting against cyber-attacks, and if an actual or perceived breach of security occurs to our systems or a third party’s systems, we could be required to expend significant resources to mitigate the breach of security and to address matters related to any such breach, including notifying users or regulators.

We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively.

We are heavily dependent on critical, complex and interdependent information technology systems, including internet-based systems, to support our business processes. Our information technology system security is continuously reviewed, maintained and upgraded in response to possible security breach incidents. Despite the implementation of these measures, our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage from external or internal security incidents, breakdowns, malicious intrusions, cybercrimes, malware, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors or other similar events. System failures, accidents or security breaches could cause interruptions in our operations and could result in inappropriately accessed, tampered with, modified or stolen our data or a material disruption of our business operations and product development, in addition to possibly requiring substantial expenditures of resources to remedy. Such events could also lead to the loss of important information such as trade secrets or other intellectual property and could accelerate the development or manufacturing of competing products by third parties. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our research and development programs could be delayed.

We are subject to extensive and evolving regulatory, reporting and compliance requirements as a long-standing public company, which may increase our costs and expose us to compliance risks.

As a listed company, we are required to comply on an ongoing basis with a broad range of laws, rules and regulations applicable to public companies, including those relating to corporate governance, financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, listing standards and investor relations. These requirements are complex, continue to evolve and may be interpreted or enforced in different ways over time, which could require us to devote significant management time and resources and incur substantial compliance and professional costs.

Changes in regulatory standards, accounting rules or enforcement priorities, or deficiencies in the design or operation of our internal control system, could require us to implement enhancements or remedial measures, and we cannot assure you that such measures, if required, can be implemented in a timely or cost-effective manner, or that they will not result in material weaknesses, restatements or other adverse consequences.

We are subject to a variety of laws and other obligations regarding data protection, any failure to comply with applicable laws and obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to various regulatory requirements relating to the security and privacy of data, including restrictions on the collection and use of personal information and requirements to take steps to prevent personal data from being divulged, stolen, or tampered with. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Internet Information Security and Privacy Protection.” Regulatory requirements regarding the protection of data are constantly evolving and can be subject to differing interpretations or significant change, making the extent of our responsibilities in that regard uncertain. For example, the PRC Cyber Security Law became effective in June 2017, but there are great uncertainties as to the interpretation and application of the law. It is possible that those regulatory requirements may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices. Further, the CAC issued the Provisions on the Cyber Protection of Children’s Personal Information on August 22, 2019, which took effect on October 1, 2019. The Provisions on the Cyber Protection of Children’s Personal Information requires, among others, that network operators who collect, store, use, transfer and disclose personal information of children under the age of 14 shall establish special rules and user agreements for the protection of children’s personal information, inform the children’s guardians in a noticeable and clear manner, and shall obtain the consent of the children’s guardians. On October 16, 2023, the CAC promulgated the Regulation on the Cyber Protection of Minors, which took effect on January 1, 2024. This regulation further improves the regulatory requirements relating to minors’ cyber protection, pursuant to which (i) network service providers shall prompt and take necessary protective measures once locating minors’ personal information or minors’ personal information is released through the Internet involving private information; (ii) the personnel handling personal information processors shall be approved by the relevant responsible person or his/her authorized management personnel before accessing minors’ personal information, document the instance of access, and implement technical measures to prevent any illegal processing of the personal information of minors. Further, on December 26, 2025, eight regulators including the CAC issued the Measures for the Classification of Network Information That May Affect the Physical and Mental Health of Minors, effective on March 1, 2026, which categorizes such harmful information, clarifies identification and labeling rules, and prohibits disseminating it in minor-targeted services or displaying it in prominent sections. In addition, on December 29, 2025, the general office of the CAC issued a notice requiring personal information processors handling minors’ personal information to submit annual compliance audit reports for the prior year by the end of January each year. In addition, the PRC regulatory authorities have recently taken steps to strengthen the regulation on data protection and conducted several rounds of relevant inspections.

In addition, the PRC regulatory authorities have recently taken steps to strengthen the regulation on cybersecurity and data protection. On June 10, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, or the SCNPC, promulgated the PRC Data Security Law, effective on September 1, 2021. On August 20, 2021, the SCNPC promulgated the PRC Personal Information Protection Law, which has become effective on November 1, 2021. On December 28, 2021, the CAC published the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, effective on February 15, 2022 and repeal the Cybersecurity Review Measures promulgated on April 13, 2020. Such Measures further restate and expand the applicable scope of the cybersecurity review. Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Review Measures, critical information infrastructure operators that procure internet products and services, and network platform operators engaging in data processing activities, must be subject to the cybersecurity review if their activities affect or may affect national security. In addition, network platform operators holding over one million users’ personal information shall apply with the Cybersecurity Review Office for a cybersecurity review before conducting any public offering in a foreign country. On August 17, 2021, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, which became effective on September 1, 2021. On January 4, 2022, the CAC published the Administrative Provisions on Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation on its website, effective on March 1, 2022. On July 7, 2022, the CAC published the Security Assessment Measures for Outbound Data Transfer, which became effective on September 1, 2022. On March 22, 2024, the CAC published the Provisions on Promoting and Regulating Cross-bound Data Flows. On September 24, 2024, the State Council promulgated the Regulation on Network Data Security Management, which came into effect on January 1, 2025. On February 14, 2025, the CAC promulgated the Measures for the Administration of Personal Information Protection Compliance Audits, which became effective on May 1, 2025. On March 21, 2025, the CAC issued the Measures on Safety Management of Facial Recognition Technology Application, effective as of June 1, 2025. On September 11, 2025, the CAC issued the Measures on National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting, which took effect on November 1, 2025. These newly promulgated laws and regulations reflect PRC government further attempts to strengthen the legal protection for the national network security, data security, the security of key information infrastructure and the security of personal information protection. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Internet Information Security and Privacy Protection” for details on regulations over data protection and privacy in the PRC.

We believe, to the best of our knowledge, our business operations do not violate any of the above PRC laws and regulations currently in force in all material aspects. We have been taking and will continue to take reasonable measures to comply with such laws, regulations, announcement, provisions and inspection requirements; however, as such laws, regulations, announcement and provisions are relatively new, how these announcements and provisions will be implemented is still subject to changes. We cannot assure you we can adapt our operations to it in a timely manner. Evolving interpretations of such laws, regulations, announcements and provisions or any future regulatory changes might impose additional restrictions on us generating and processing personal and behavioral data. We may be subject to additional regulations, laws and policies adopted by the PRC government to apply more stringent social and ethical standards in data privacy resulting from the increased global focus on this area. To the extent that we need to alter our business model or practices to adapt to these announcement and provisions and future regulations, laws and policies, we could incur additional expenses.

Many overseas jurisdictions have established data privacy and cybersecurity legal framework, for example, the European Union (the “EU”) has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), which requires originations and companies to comply with rules regarding the processing of personal data, including its use, protection and ensuring individual’s access to their own data, to correct or delete personal data about themselves. GDPR also sets out strict requirements pertaining to transfers of personal data outside of the EU. These requirements necessitate careful consideration, and detailed risk assessments, of potential cross border transfers of personal data to ensure compliance with GDPR. In addition to conducting data transfer impact assessments, companies may also need to introduce additional safeguards and put in place contract provisions to ensure that such transfers do not diminish the level of protection that data subjects would otherwise have under GDPR. Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover from the preceding financial, whichever is the greater.

Any failure, or perceived failure, by us, or by our third-party partners, to maintain the security of our user data or to comply with applicable privacy, cybersecurity, data security and personal information protection laws, regulations, policies, contractual provisions, industry standards, and other requirements, may result in civil or regulatory liability, including governmental or data protection authority enforcement actions and investigations, fines, penalties, enforcement orders requiring us to cease operating in a certain way, litigation, or adverse publicity, and may require us to expend significant resources in responding to and defending allegations and claims. Moreover, claims or allegations that we have failed to adequately protect our users’ data, or otherwise violated applicable privacy, cybersecurity, data security and personal information protection laws, regulations, policies, contractual provisions, industry standards, or other requirements, may result in damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in us by our users or our partners, potentially causing us to lose users, advertisers, content providers, other business partners and revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may face risks and uncertainties with respect to the licensing requirement for internet audio-visual programs.

According to relevant PRC laws and regulations, no entities or individuals may provide internet audio-visual program services, which includes making and editing of audio-visual programs concerning educational content and broadcasting such content to the general public online, without a License for Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs issued by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, or the SAPPRFT (currently known as National Radio and Television Administration), or its local bureaus or completing the relevant registration procedures with SAPPRFT or its local bureaus. And only state-owned or state-controlled entities are eligible to apply for a License for Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs.” However, there are still significant uncertainties relating to the interpretation and implementation of the Administrative Provisions on Internet Audio-Visual Program Service, or the Audio-Visual Program Provisions, in particular, the scope of “internet audio-visual programs.”

We offer live courses in live-streaming format where the live audio/video data are transmitted through the platforms between the specific recipients instantly without any further redaction. In addition, we also offer video recordings of live streaming courses and certain other audio-video contents on our online platforms to our users. We believe the nature of the raw data we transmit distinguishes us from general providers of internet audio-visual program services. However, we cannot assure you that the competent PRC government authorities will not ultimately take a view contrary to our opinion. Provisional Implementation of the Tentative Categories of Internet Audio-Visual Program Services promulgated by the SAPPRFT, or the Categories, describe “internet audio-visual program services” in a broad manner and we cannot assure you whether the contents we offer or are available on our platforms fall into the definition of “internet audio-visual programs. The PRC government may find that our activities mentioned above or any other content offered on our mobile apps fall within the definition of “internet audio-visual programs” and thus are subject to the licensing requirement for internet audio-visual programs. We currently do not hold a License for Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs. If the PRC government determines that our content should be considered as “internet audio-visual programs” for the purpose of the Audio-Visual Program Provisions, we may be required to obtain a License for Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs. We are, however, not eligible to apply for such license since we are not a state-owned or state-controlled entity. If this were to occur, we may be subject to penalties, fines, legal sanctions or an order to suspend the provision of our relevant content.

Our failure to obtain, maintain or renew other licenses, approvals, permits, registrations or filings necessary to conduct our and the VIEs’ operations in China could have a material adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

A number of PRC regulatory authorities, such as the SAIC, the CAC, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), the SAPPRFT, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Welfare, regulate different aspects of our business operations, and we are required to obtain a wide range of licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and filings required for conducting our business in China, and we cannot assure you that we have obtained all of them or will continue to maintain or renew all of them.

We may be deemed to provide certain services or conduct certain activities and thus be subject to certain licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and filings due to the lack of official interpretations of certain terms under internet related PRC regulations and laws. For example, certain content posted on our mobile apps and/or websites or otherwise posted by us may be deemed as “online performance” or “internet cultural products,” and our use of such content may be regarded as “internet cultural activities,” thus we may be required to obtain an Internet Culture Business Operating License for provision and operation of such content. In addition, since the definition of “online publishing service” is broad and subject to evolving interpretations, the online distribution of content, including our course materials, through our mobile apps, may be regarded as an “online publishing service” and therefore we may be required to obtain an Online Publishing License. In addition, we deliver certain courses in live-streaming format on our mobile apps which the relevant authorities may regard as a live-streaming platform and may thus require us to make necessary filings as a live-streaming platform. We or third parties post information on our mobile apps and websites that may be viewed as news information, and the release of such information on our mobile apps and websites may be deemed as Internet news information services and therefore require us to obtain Internet news information licenses. Furthermore, our mobile apps operating within the PRC are required to complete the record-filing procedure before their operation. In addition, our current service offerings may be deemed to constitute “online education activities” under the Amended Implementation Rules, as a result of which we may be required to obtain a private school operating permit. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you whether the PRC government authorities would issue more explicit interpretation and rules or promulgate new laws and regulations on permits for online learning services. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully obtain corresponding permits, approvals or filings in a timely manner or at all. If the government authorities deem printing and providing physical education materials to users as “publication distribution” under Administrative Provisions on the Publications Market, we may be required to obtain the Publication License. Moreover, the Opinions on Educational Apps require all of educational apps to be filed with competent provincial regulatory authorities in spheres of education. Following the release of the Opinions on Educational Apps, we filed our educational apps with relevant government authorities. However, to implement the Alleviating Burden Opinion, the MOE requires all educational apps that have already been filed with the relevant government authorities to be re-filed to make sure such educational apps comply with relevant compliance requirements under the Alleviating Burden Opinion, and we have already completed such re-filing for certain of our educational apps and are also in the process of re-filing certain other educational apps. As of the date of this annual report, we have not been subject to any material fines or other form of material regulatory or administrative penalties or sanctions due to the lack of any licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and filings. However, we cannot assure you that the PRC government authorities will not take a different view or will not require us to obtain any additional licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and filings, including without limitation to those mentioned above, in the future. Furthermore, although we have obtained a Value-Added Telecommunications Business Operating License, also known as the ICP License, that specifically permits us to provide certain internet information services, due to uncertainties with respect to the interpretation of relevant laws and regulations by PRC government authorities, we cannot assure you that our ICP License covers all the telecommunication services we currently provide, and in the event that our ICP License is found not to cover all the telecommunication services we currently provide, we may be required to obtain an additional Value-Added Telecommunications Business Operating License or to update our existing ICP License. On July 10, 2023, the CAC published the Provisional Administrative Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services, or the Generative AI Services Measures, which took effect on August 15, 2023. The Generative AI Services Measures provide, among others, that any providers of generative AI products with public opinion attributes or social mobilization capabilities shall conduct security assessment in accordance with relevant regulations, and complete the filing procedures in accordance with the Administrative Provisions on Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation. As the promulgation and implementation of Generative AI Services Measures may be subject to changes, and we cannot assure you that we may complete relevant assessment and filings as required thereunder in a timely manner or at all. Besides, we may develop new business lines or change the operations of certain of our current business among our PRC subsidiaries or VIEs, which may require us to obtain additional licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and filings while there can be no assurance that we are able to successfully obtain such licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and filings in a timely manner or at all. Failures to obtain or update such license, approvals, permits, registrations, assessment or filings may subject us to fines and other regulatory, civil or criminal liabilities, and we may be ordered by the competent government authorities to suspend our services, which will materially and adversely affect our business operation.

In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing licenses, approvals, registrations or permits necessary to provide our current online services in China, renew any of them when their current term expires, or update existing licenses or obtain additional licenses, approvals, permits, registrations or filings necessary for our business expansion from time to time. If we fail to do so, our business, financial condition and operational results may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business is subject to the risks of international operations.

We have launched products and services in overseas markets, such as Youdao Ads and AI-driven subscription. As we plan to expand our operations in additional emerging markets and regions, we may have to adapt our business models to the local market due to various legal requirements and market conditions. Our international operations and expansion efforts have resulted and may continue to result in increased costs and are subject to a variety of risks, including increased competition, uncertain enforcement of our intellectual property rights, changes and evolutions in overseas market conditions and user preferences, the complexity of compliance with foreign laws and regulations and political or social unrest or economic instability.

Our international operations may also be negatively affected by any deterioration of the political and economic relations between China and other countries and sanctions and export controls administered by the government authorities in the foreign countries in which we operate, and other geopolitical challenges. In addition, compliance with applicable Chinese and foreign laws and regulations, such as import and export requirements, anticorruption laws, tax laws, foreign exchange controls and cash repatriation restrictions, data privacy requirements, labor laws, restrictions on foreign investment, anti-competition regulations and anti-long-arm jurisdiction-related laws and regulations such as the one newly promulgated in China, increases the costs and risk exposure of doing business in foreign jurisdictions. Although we have implemented policies and procedures to comply with these laws and regulations, a violation by us or our employees, contractors or agents could nevertheless occur. In some cases, compliance with the laws and regulations of one country could violate the laws and regulations of another country. Violations of these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our brand, international growth efforts and business.

In recent year, there have been ongoing concerns about the relationship and trade disputes between the United States and China. These tensions have been marked by the imposition of higher tariffs and retaliatory measures from both sides, reflecting broader strategies to address perceived trade imbalances. While these developments have not directly impacted our business, they could affect our customers who export goods to these markets. Additionally, prolonged trade disputes may disrupt global economic conditions, potentially impacting our business and growth prospects.

Separately, we may also be subject to review and enforcement under domestic and foreign laws that screen foreign investment and acquisitions. In both the U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions, these regulatory requirements may treat companies differently based on the type of company in question and investor profile in the company. As a result of these laws, investments by particular investors may need to be filed with local regulators, which in turn may impose added costs on our business, impact our operations, and/or limit our ability to engage in strategic transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us and our investors. These laws are also regularly changed and updated. For example, recently the Office of Investment Security of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a final rule (the “Outbound Investment Rule”) to implement the Executive Order 14105, which provided for the establishment of a new national security regulatory framework to control outbound investment from the United States in certain sensitive industry sectors in the People’s Republic of China, including Hong Kong and Macau. The Outbound Investment Rule took effect in January 2025 and restricts U.S. persons’ direct and indirect investment into companies with specified connections to China that engage in specified “Covered Activities” within three areas of technology: semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence systems. Notably, President Trump issued the America First Trade Policy Memorandum on February 20, 2025, which proposes to further expand the set of technologies of concern. These rules may limit our ability to engage in certain kinds of business operations; they may also limit our ability to raise capital from U.S. and other sources if we engage in the development of such technologies of concern.

In addition, the America First Trade Policy Memorandum also proposes, among other things, that (a) the variable interest entity and subsidiary structures used by foreign-adversary companies that limit the ownership rights and protections for U.S. investors shall be strictly reviewed, and (b) the SEC is directed to determine if adequate financial auditing standards are upheld for companies covered by the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. Despite that the relevant agencies may consider initiating the rulemaking process to implement the relevant aspects of the America First Trade Policy Memorandum, the specific timeline, scope, and final content of any such regulations remain uncertain and subject to change. Any new or more stringent regulations arising from this memorandum could materially impact PRC companies listed on U.S. exchanges, including but not limited to by imposing additional compliance burdens, restricting access to U.S. capital markets, or increasing the risk of delisting.

Our business operations, particularly our overseas online marketing activities, are subject to heightened compliance risks and operational challenges arising from evolving U.S. regulatory restrictions on data access and transfers. On February 28, 2024, the U.S. government issued Executive Order 14117 (EO 14117), which aims to prevent access to U.S. bulk sensitive personal data and government-related data by “countries of concern,” including China. The U.S. Department of Justice issued a comprehensive final rule implementing EO 14117, titled Preventing Access to Americans’ Bulk Sensitive Personal Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern (the “Final Rule”), which became effective on April 8, 2025. Under the Final Rule, certain data transactions involving “covered persons” or entities with specified ties to China may be prohibited or restricted, including data brokerage activities, vendor agreements, employment agreements, and investment arrangements. Compliance with these requirements is expected to increase our operational costs. Failure to comply with the Final Rule could expose us to significant penalties, including civil fines or criminal sanctions, as well as potential investigations by U.S. authorities.

Furthermore, due to evolving economic, political and regulatory conditions, tax policies, laws and rates across jurisdictions may undergo significant changes that could adversely affect our financial results. In December 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released Pillar Two GloBE Model Rules for a new global minimum tax (commonly referred to as “Pillar Two”), which introduces a 15% minimum effective tax rate for large multinational enterprises. In-scope multinational enterprises are required to compute their Pillar Two effective tax rate for each jurisdiction in which they operate and may be subject to a top-up tax equal to the difference between the calculated effective tax rate and the 15% minimum rate. As of the date of this annual report, various jurisdictions have enacted legislation to implement or partially implement the Pillar Two rules beginning in 2024, 2025 and 2026, with additional jurisdictions to follow in subsequent years, or have announced plans to do so in the future. The OECD issued new administrative guidance on January 5, 2026, with respect to Pillar 2 which modifies key aspects of the framework for countries to enact in their own laws. We have evaluated, and will continue, to assess the impact of these legislative developments in the jurisdictions where we operate. Given that the rules are subject to ongoing changes and clarifications, uncertainties exist regarding the interpretation and implementation of the rules, and there is no guarantee that these legislative developments will not have effect on our financial performance.

We may not be successful in developing or maintaining relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing or offering products and services that operate effectively with these operating systems, networks, devices and standards.

We make our products and services available on both iOS and Android systems across a variety of mobile devices. We depend on the interoperability of our products and services with popular devices and mobile operating systems that we do not control. Any changes in devices or their systems that degrade the functionality of our products and services or give preferential treatment to competitive products or services could adversely affect usage of our products and services. We may not be successful in developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing products and services that operate effectively with their operating systems, networks, devices and standards. We also cooperate with key participants in the mobile industry to display our products and services on the front page of their respective app stores and recommend our products and services to help us attract prospective users. If we cannot maintain such relationships at reasonable costs or at all, we may not get sufficient exposure on their respective platforms, which will impair our ability to acquire traffic. Moreover, we are subject to the terms, policies and conditions of the app stores. If any of the key participants finds us to be in violation of the terms, policies and conditions of its app store, it may seek economic damages from us or remove our products from its app store. Such incident would also harm our relationship with the key participant. Further, if the number of systems, networks and devices for which we develop our products and services increases, it will result in an increase in our costs and expenses, and adversely affect our net margin and results of operations.

If we are unable to conduct sales and marketing activities cost-effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We rely on our sales and marketing efforts to attract new users and customers and expand users’ and customers’ use of our products and services. Our sales and marketing activities may not be well received by the market and may not result in the levels of sales that we anticipate. We also may not be able to retain or recruit a sufficient number of experienced sales and marketing personnel, or to train newly hired sales and marketing personnel, which we believe is critical to implementing our sales and marketing strategies cost-effectively. Further, sales and marketing approaches and tools in China’s intelligent learning industry are evolving rapidly. This requires us to continually enhance our sales and marketing approaches and experiment with new methods to keep pace with industry developments and user preferences. Failure to engage in sales and marketing activities in a cost-effective manner may reduce our market share, cause our net revenues to decline, negatively impact our profitability, and materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends on the continuing efforts of our senior management team and other key employees.

We depend on the continued contributions of our senior management and other key employees. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or other key employees could harm our business. Competition for qualified talents in China is intense. If one or more of our senior management or other key employees are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to find replacements in a timely manner, or at all, and our business may be disrupted. Moreover, if any member of our senior management team or any of our other key personnel joins a competitor or forms or invests in a competing business, we may lose know-how, key professionals and other valuable resources, which in turn may cause our customers to choose to use the products or services of that competitor instead of ours. Our future success is also dependent on our ability to attract a significant number of qualified employees and retain existing key employees. If we are unable to do so, our business and growth may be materially and adversely affected. Our need to significantly increase the number of our qualified employees and retain key employees may cause us to materially increase compensation-related costs, including share-based compensation.

We may be the subject of detrimental conduct by third parties such as our competitors, including complaints to regulatory agencies and the public dissemination of malicious assessments of our business, which could have a negative impact on our reputation.

We have been, and in the future may be, the target of anticompetitive, harassing or other detrimental conduct by third parties including our competitors. Such conduct may include complaints, anonymous or otherwise, to regulatory agencies regarding our operations, accounting, business relationships, business prospects and business ethics. Additionally, allegations, directly or indirectly against us, might be posted online by anyone, whether or not related to us, on an anonymous basis. We may be subject to government or regulatory investigation as a result of such third-party conduct and may be required to expend significant time and incur substantial costs to address such third-party conduct, and there is no assurance that we will be able to conclusively refute each of the allegations within a reasonable period of time, or at all. Our reputation may also be materially negatively affected as a result of the public dissemination of anonymous allegations or malicious statements about our business.

We might not be able to successfully pursue synergy from acquisitions or to achieve the benefits we expect from recent and future investments, strategic alliance and acquisitions.

We may form strategic alliances or make strategic investments and acquisitions from time to time to complement and enhance our existing business. Any transactions that we enter into could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. The process of integrating with another company or integrating an acquired company, business, asset or technology may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The areas where we face risks include:

Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our future acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and expenses and harm our business generally. We may also experience difficulties in integrating our operations with the newly invested or acquired businesses, implementing our strategies or achieving expected levels of revenues, profitability, productivity or other benefits. Moreover, if the businesses we acquire or invest in or our strategic alliances or partnerships do not subsequently generate the anticipated financial performance or if any goodwill impairment test triggering event occurs, we may need to revalue or write down the value of goodwill and other intangible assets in connection with such transactions, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we may be unable to identify appropriate strategic investment or alliance targets when it is necessary or desirable to make such acquisition or investment to remain competitive or to expand our business. Even if we identify an appropriate target, we may not be able to negotiate the terms of the transaction successfully. In the event that we do not have control over the companies in which we only have minority stake, we cannot ensure that these companies will at all times comply with applicable laws and regulations in their business operations. Material non-compliance by our investees may cause substantial harms to our reputations and the value of our investments.

We may be required to recognize impairment losses in connection with our goodwill and other intangible assets.

We have in the past acquired and invested in, and may continue to acquire and invest in, other businesses that we believe will help expand or enhance our existing offerings or achieve our strategic objectives. To the extent we acquire other companies and pay a consideration that exceeds the fair value of identifiable fair value of consideration assets and liabilities that the acquired company possesses, the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired identifiable assets and the assumed liabilities will be recorded as a goodwill. As of December 31, 2025, our goodwill amounted to RMB109.9 million (US$15.7 million), which was primarily derived from our historical acquisition, and our intangible assets amounted to RMB1.0 million (US$0.1 million). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets shall be tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with finite lives shall be tested for impairment if their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If testing indicates that goodwill or intangible assets are impaired, their carrying amounts will be written down based on fair values. Any impairment losses of our goodwill and other intangible assets could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. Impairment losses on intangible assets from business combination of RMB56.8 million was recognized in 2021. No impairment charge of goodwill and other intangible assets was recognized in 2023, 2024 or 2025.

We may be subject to litigations, allegations, complaints and investigations from time to time arising out of our operations, and our reputation and operations may be adversely affected.

We have been and may continue to be involved in legal and other disputes in the ordinary course of our business, including allegations against us for potential infringement of third party’s copyrights or other intellectual property rights, as well as customer complaints in relation to our refund policy, course content, the quality of our devices and data security and other dissatisfactions. We might be involved in governmental investigations for advertisement or content posted on our platforms in the future. Any claims against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert our management’s attention and resources or harm our brand equity. If a lawsuit or governmental proceeding against us is successful, we may be required to pay substantial damages or fines and/or enter into royalty or license agreements that may not be based upon commercially reasonable terms, or we may be unable to enter into such agreements at all. We may also lose, or be limited in, the rights to offer some of our content, products and services or be required to make changes to our content offerings or business model. As a result, the scope of our content, product and service offerings could be reduced, which could adversely affect our ability to attract new users, harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our advertising and promotional content may subject us to penalties and other administrative actions.

Under PRC advertising, pricing and anti-unfair competition laws and regulations, we are obligated to monitor our advertising and promotional content to ensure that such content is true and accurate and in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. For example, the PRC Pricing Law provides that an operator is prohibited from using false or misunderstanding pricing methods to induce consumers or other operators into trading with it. In addition, education or training advertisement are further prohibited from containing content such as guarantee for passing of examination or the effect of education or training, recommendation and/or endorsement by scientific research institutes, academic institutions, educational organizations, industry associations, professionals or beneficiaries using their name or image. Further, the Alleviating Burden Opinion provides that no advertisements in connection with after-school tutoring services shall be published or broadcasted on the network platforms and billboards displayed on the mainstream media, new media, public space and residential areas. Violation of these laws and regulations may subject us to penalties, including fines, confiscation of our advertising income, orders to cease dissemination of the advertisements and orders to publish an announcement correcting the misleading information. In circumstances involving serious violations by us, PRC government authorities may force us to terminate our advertising operations or revoke our licenses.

Relevant PRC regulatory authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing the advertising, pricing and anti-unfair competition. We cannot assure you that all the content contained in our advertisements is true and accurate as required by, and complies in all aspects with, the advertising, pricing and anti-unfair competition laws and regulations, we also cannot assure you that we can rectify such content which is deemed not in compliance with such laws and regulations in a timely manner or at all, especially given the uncertainty in the interpretation of these PRC laws and regulations. If we are found to be in violation of applicable PRC advertising laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties and our reputation may be harmed, which may negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we fail to maintain an effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately and timely report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud and investor confidence in our company and the market price of our ADSs may decline.

As a public company, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, report any material weaknesses in such internal controls and provide a management report on internal control over financial reporting.

Our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2025. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report, which has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2025. However, there is no assurance that we or our auditor will not identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses and render our internal control over financial reporting ineffective for any future periods. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. However, if we fail to maintain effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a negative impact on the trading price of our ADSs. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the NYSE, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions.

We have granted, and may continue to grant, share incentives, which may result in increased share-based compensation expenses.

We adopted two share incentive plans in February 2015 (as amended in April 2018 and November 2024) and April 2023, which we refer to as the 2015 Plan and 2023 Plan, respectively, for the purpose of granting share-based compensation awards to employees, officers, directors and consultants to incentivize their performance and promote the success of our business.

We account for compensation costs for share-based awards using a fair-value based method and recognize expenses in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As of March 31, 2026, options to purchase a total of 1,889,607 ordinary shares and restricted share units representing a total of 727,473 ordinary shares were outstanding under the 2015 Plan, and restricted share units representing a total of 133,890 ordinary shares were outstanding under the 2023 Plan. In addition, we recorded share-based compensation expenses of RMB0.4 million, RMB0.4 million and RMB1.5 million (US$0.2 million), respectively, allocated to us based on awards granted to our employees under NetEase’s incentive plans, in 2023, 2024 and 2025. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—7.B. Related Party Transactions—Transactions with NetEase and Other Related Parties.”

We believe the granting of share-based awards is of significant importance to our ability to attract and retain key personnel and employees, and we will continue to grant share-based awards in the future. As a result, our expenses associated with share-based compensation may increase. We may also continue to record share-based compensation allocated to us based on awards granted to our employees under NetEase’s incentive plans, which may cause our share-based compensation to increase. Any increase in our share-based compensation may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Failure to make adequate contributions to various employee benefits plans as required by PRC regulations may subject us to penalties.

Companies operating in China are required to participate in various government-sponsored employee benefit plans, including certain social insurance, housing funds and other welfare-oriented payment obligations, and contribute to the plans in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of employees up to a maximum amount specified by the local government from time to time at locations where our employees are based. The requirement of employee benefit plans has not been implemented consistently by the local governments in China given the different levels of economic development in different locations. To efficiently administrate the contribution of employment benefit plans of our employees in some cities, we engage third-party agents to make the contribution for our employees. Our failure to make contributions to various employee benefit plans and in complying with applicable PRC labor-related laws may subject us to late payment penalties, and we could be required to make up the contributions for these plans as well as to pay late fees and fines. If we are subject to late fees or fines in relation to the underpaid employee benefits, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Increases in labor costs in the PRC may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The PRC Labor Contract Law has reinforced the protection of employees who, under the PRC Labor Contract Law, have the right, among others, to have written employment contracts, to enter into employment contracts with no fixed term under certain circumstances, to receive overtime wages and to terminate or alter terms in labor contracts. Furthermore, the PRC Labor Contract Law sets forth additional restrictions and increases the costs involved with dismissing employees. To the extent that we need to significantly reduce our workforce, the PRC Labor Contract Law could adversely affect our ability to do so in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, for employees whose employment contracts include non-competition terms, the PRC Labor Contract Law requires us to pay economic compensation to the laborer on a monthly basis during the term of non-competition after such employment is terminated, which will increase our operating expenses.

In addition, we are required by PRC laws and regulations to make social insurance registration and open housing fund account with relevant governmental authorities and pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an employer has made adequate payments of the requisite statutory employee benefits, and those employers who fail to make adequate payments may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties. If we fail to make adequate social insurance and housing fund contributions, we may be subject to fines and legal sanctions, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to pass on these increased labor costs to our customers by increasing the prices of our products and services, our financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We face certain risks relating to the real properties that we lease.

We lease real properties from third parties primarily for our office use in China, and the lease agreements for most of these leased properties have not been registered with the PRC government authorities as required by PRC law. Although the failure to do so does not in itself invalidate the leases, we may be ordered by the PRC government authorities to rectify such non-compliance and, if such non-compliance were not rectified within a given period of time, we may be subject to fines imposed by PRC government authorities ranging from RMB1,000 and RMB10,000 for those of our lease agreements that have not been registered with the relevant PRC government authorities.

As of the date of this annual report, we are not aware of any regulatory or governmental actions, claims or investigations being contemplated or any challenges by third parties to our use of our leased properties the lease agreements of which have not been registered with the government authorities. However, we cannot assure you that the government authorities will not impose fines on us due to our failure to register any of our lease agreements, which may negatively impact our financial condition.

In addition, some of the ownership certificates or other similar proof of certain leased properties have not been provided to us by the relevant lessors. Therefore, we cannot assure you that such lessors are entitled to lease the relevant real properties to us. If the lessors are not entitled to lease the real properties to us and the owners of such real properties decline to ratify the lease agreements between us and the respective lessors, we may not be able to enforce our rights to lease such properties under the respective lease agreements against the owners. As of the date of this annual report, we are not aware of any claim or challenge brought by any third parties concerning the use of our leased properties without obtaining proper ownership proof. If our lease agreements are claimed as null and void by third parties who are the real owners of such leased real properties, we could be required to vacate the properties, in the event of which we could only initiate the claim against the lessors under relevant lease agreements for indemnities for their breach of the relevant leasing agreements. We cannot assure you that suitable alternative locations are readily available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and if we are unable to relocate our operations in a timely manner, our operations may be interrupted.

Any change, disruption, discontinuity in the features and functions of major social networks in China could severely limit our ability to continue growing our user base, and our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Our success depends on our ability to maintain our large user or customer bases and attract new users and customers. We leverage social networks in China as a tool for user acquisition and engagement. For example, we leverage Weixin/WeChat to enable users to access our services. To the extent that we fail to leverage such social networks, our ability to attract or retain users may be severely harmed. If any of these social networks makes changes to its functions or support unfavorable to us, or stops offering its functions or support to us, we may not be able to locate alternative platforms of similar scale to provide similar functions or support on commercially reasonable terms in a timely manner, or at all. Furthermore, we may fail to establish or maintain relationships with additional social network operators to support the growth of our business on economically viable terms, or at all. Any interruption to or discontinuation of our relationships with major social network operators may severely and negatively impact our ability to continue growing our user base, and any occurrence of the circumstances mentioned above may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operations depend on the performance of the internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China.

The successful operation of our business depends on the performance of the internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China. Almost all access to the internet is maintained through state-owned telecommunications operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the MIIT. Moreover, we have entered into contracts with various subsidiaries of a limited number of telecommunications service providers at provincial level and rely on them to provide us with data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines. We have limited access to alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s internet infrastructure or the telecommunications networks provided by telecommunications service providers. Our platform regularly serves a large number of users and advertisers. With the expansion of our business, we may be required to upgrade our technology and infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on our platform. However, we have no control over the costs of the services provided by telecommunications service providers. If the prices we pay for telecommunications and internet services rise significantly, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. If internet access fees or other charges to internet users increase, our user traffic may decline and our business may be harmed.

We are subject to third-party payment processing-related risks.

We accept payments through major third-party online payment channels in China, as well as bank transfers and credit cards. We may also be susceptible to fraud, user data leakage and other illegal activities in connection with the various payment methods we offer. In addition, our business depends on the billing, payment and escrow systems of the third-party payment service providers to maintain accurate records of payments by customers and collect such payments. If the quality, utility, convenience or attractiveness of these payment processing and escrow services declines, or if we have to change the pattern of using these payment services for any reason, the attractiveness of our company could be materially and adversely affected. We are also subject to various rules, regulations and requirements, regulatory or otherwise, governing electronic funds transfers which could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and become unable to accept the current online payments solutions from our customers, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Business involving online payment services is subject to a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect third-party online payment service providers’ ability to provide payment processing and escrow services to us, including:

We currently do not have any business insurance coverage.

Insurance companies in China currently do not offer as extensive an array of insurance products as insurance companies in more developed economies. Currently, we do not have any business liability or disruption insurance to cover our operations. We have determined that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Any uninsured business disruptions may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Increasing focus with respect to environmental, social and governance matters may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks. Failure to comply with the laws and regulations on environmental, social and governance matters may subject us to penalties and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The PRC government and public advocacy groups have been increasingly focused on environment, social and governance (“ESG”) issues in recent years, making our business more sensitive to ESG issues and changes in governmental policies and laws and regulations associated with environment protection and other ESG-related matters. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, and other influential investors are also increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. Regardless of the industry, increased focus from investors and the PRC government on ESG and similar matters may hinder access to capital, as investors may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices. Any ESG concern or issue could increase our regulatory compliance costs. If we do not adapt to or comply with the evolving expectations and standards on ESG matters from investors and the PRC government or are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, we may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and the price of our ADSs could be materially and adversely effected.

We face risks related to natural disasters, extreme weather conditions, health epidemics, such as the outbreak of COVID-19, and other catastrophic incidents, which could significantly disrupt our operations.

China has in the past experienced significant natural disasters, including earthquakes, extreme weather conditions, as well as health scares related to epidemic diseases, and any similar event could materially impact our business in the future. If a disaster or other disruption were to occur in the future that affects the regions where we operate our business, our operations could be materially and adversely affected due to loss of personnel and damages to property. Even if we are not directly affected, such a disaster or disruption could affect our operations or financial condition.

In addition, our business could be affected by public health epidemics, such as the outbreak of COVID-19, avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, Zika virus, Ebola virus, coronavirus or other disease. If any of our employees is suspected of having contracted a contagious disease, we may be required to apply quarantines or suspend our operations. Furthermore, any future outbreak may restrict economic activities in affected regions, resulting in reduced business volume, temporary closure of our offices or otherwise disrupt our business operations and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our user metrics and other estimates are subject to inaccuracy in measuring our operating performance, which may harm our reputation.

We continually review user metrics, such as MAUs, to evaluate growth trends, measure our performance and make strategic decisions. These metrics are calculated using internal data and may not be indicative of our future operating performance. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring how our website and mobile application are used across a large user base. For example, the actual number of individual users, is likely to be lower than that of our MAUs, potentially significantly, due to various reasons such as access to our products and services through multiple mobile devices. We have limited ability to validate or confirm the accuracy of information provided during the user registration process to ascertain whether a new user account created was actually created by an existing user who is registering duplicative accounts. As a result, the number of our MAUs may overstate the number of individuals who access our products and services. In addition, there may be variation in the degree to which MAU is a relevant metric in measuring the user engagement from one product or service to another, due to the different nature and engagement patterns of our various smart devices and learning services. For example, a one-time user of our Youdao Dictionary mobile app and a frequent user taking one of our tutoring services are counted equally as one MAU. If investors do not perceive our operating metrics to accurately represent our operating performance, or if we discover material inaccuracies in our operating metrics, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

The approval, filing or other requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC government authorities may be required under PRC law in connection with our issuance of securities overseas or maintenance of the listing status of our ADSs, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing or other requirements.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, purport to require offshore special purpose vehicles that are controlled by PRC companies or individuals and that have been formed for the purpose of seeking a public listing on an overseas stock exchange through acquisitions of PRC domestic companies or assets to obtain CSRC approval prior to publicly listing their securities on an overseas stock exchange. The interpretation and application of the regulations are subject to changes and may evolve from time to time. If CSRC approval under the M&A Rules is required, it is uncertain whether it would be possible for us to obtain the approval, and any failure to obtain or delay in obtaining CSRC approval for our future issuance of securities overseas would subject us to sanctions imposed by the CSRC and other PRC regulatory agencies.

Furthermore, we conduct our business primarily through our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs and their subsidiaries in China. Our and the VIEs’ operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. The PRC government has significant oversight and discretion over the operation of our and the VIEs’ business, and it may influence our and the VIEs’ operations, which could result in a material adverse change in our and the VIEs’ operations and the value of our ADSs. The PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight over overseas offerings by and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers like us. For example, on July 6, 2021, relevant PRC government authorities promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities, which emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over “illegal securities activities” and the supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies, and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies, although such opinions did not specify the definition of “illegal securities activities.” Such opinions further provided that the special provisions of the State Council on overseas offerings and listings by those companies limited by shares will be revised and therefore the duties of domestic industry competent authorities and regulatory agencies will be clarified.

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report relevant information to the CSRC. In addition, domestic companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures are required to file with the CSRC within three working days after such domestic company completes a subsequent security offering on the foreign stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Since the Overseas Listing Trial Measures was newly promulgated, its interpretation, application and enforcement are subject to changes and may evolve from time to time. If the filing procedure with the CSRC under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures is required for any future offerings, listing or any other capital raising activities by us, it is uncertain whether we could complete the filing procedure in a timely manner, or at all.

In addition, on December 28, 2021, the CAC published the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network products and services, and platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list abroad must apply for cybersecurity review. To the interpretation, application, and enforcement of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures and whether to conduct a security offering or maintain our listing status on the NYSE will be subject to the cybersecurity review procedures are subject to changes and may evolve from time to time.

We believe, to the best of our knowledge, our and the VIEs’ business operations do not violate any of the above PRC laws and regulations currently in force in all material respects. However, we cannot guarantee that new rules or regulations promulgated in the future will not impose any additional requirement on us or otherwise tightening the regulations on companies with a VIE structure. If the CSRC or other relevant PRC regulatory agencies subsequently determine that prior approval or any filing is required for any of our future offerings of securities overseas or maintenance of the listing status of our ADSs, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such approval in a timely manner, or at all. The CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies also may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, not to proceed with such offering or maintain the listing status of our ADSs. If we proceed with any of such offering or maintain the listing status of our ADSs without obtaining the CSRC’s or other PRC regulatory agencies’ approval to the extent it is required, or if we are unable to comply with any new approval requirements which might be adopted for offerings that we have completed prior to the publication of the above- referenced opinions, we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our and the VIEs’ operations in China, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of China, limit our operating privileges in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from offering of securities overseas into China or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs.

Furthermore, if there are any other approvals, filings and/or other administration procedures to be obtained from or completed with the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies as required by any new laws and regulations for any of our future proposed offering of securities overseas or the listing of the ADSs, we cannot assure you that we can obtain the required approval or complete the required filings or other regulatory procedures in a timely manner, or at all. Any failure to obtain the relevant approvals or complete the filings and other relevant regulatory procedures may subject us to regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies, which may have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, implementation of industry-wide regulations affecting our and the VIEs’ operations could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors of our company and our and the VIEs’ business face potential uncertainty from actions taken by the PRC government affecting our and the VIEs’ business.

Risks Related to Our Relationship with NetEase

If we are no longer able to benefit from our business cooperation with NetEase, our business may be adversely affected.

NetEase, our controlling shareholder, is a leading internet technology company in China. Our business has benefited significantly from NetEase’s brand name and strong market position and user bases, and we cooperate with NetEase in a number of areas, such as advertising arrangements, user acquisition and IT infrastructure. In addition, we have also received funding support from the NetEase Group. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to benefit from our cooperative relationships with NetEase in the future. To the extent that we cannot maintain our relationships with NetEase on terms favorable to us, or at all, we will need to find replacement business partners and services providers, which may not be done in a timely manner and/or on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and we may lose access to key strategic assets, which could result in material and adverse effects on our business and results of operations.

Any negative development in NetEase’s market position, brand recognition or financial condition may materially and adversely affect us.

We have benefited, and expect to continue to benefit, significantly from NetEase’s strong brand recognition, which enhances our reputation and credibility. Any negative publicity associated with NetEase or any member of the NetEase Group or any negative development with respect to NetEase’s market position, financial condition or compliance with applicable legal or regulatory requirements will likely have an adverse impact on our reputation and brand. In addition, we collaborate with the NetEase Group to attract user traffic from their products and services to our offerings, and if NetEase’s market position weakens, the effectiveness of our sales and marketing through NetEase may be impaired, which may in turn have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—7.B. Related Party Transactions” for more information about our related party transactions with the NetEase Group.

NetEase, our controlling shareholder, has had and will continue to have effective control over the outcome of shareholder actions in our company. The interests of NetEase may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders and holders of the ADSs.

As of March 31, 2026, NetEase, our controlling shareholder beneficially owned 8.9% of our issued and outstanding Class A ordinary shares and 74.3% of our issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares, representing 67.1% of the total voting power of our total issued and outstanding share capital (excluding 5,334,815 Class A ordinary shares repurchased in the form of ADSs). NetEase’s voting power gives it the power to control certain actions that require shareholder approval under Cayman Islands law, our memorandum and articles of association and NYSE requirements, including authorization of a plan of merger, changes to our memorandum and articles of association and an increase of the authorized share capital.

NetEase’s voting control may cause transactions to occur that might not be beneficial to you as a holder of the ADSs and may prevent transactions that could have been beneficial to you. For example, NetEase’s voting control may prevent a transaction involving a change of control in us, including transactions in which you as a holder of the ADSs might otherwise receive a premium for the ADSs over the then-current market price. In addition, NetEase is not prohibited from selling the controlling interest in us to a third party and may do so without your approval and without providing for a purchase of your ADSs. If NetEase is acquired, otherwise undergoes a change of control or is subject to a corporate restructuring, an acquirer, successor or other third party may be entitled to exercise the voting control and contractual rights of NetEase, and may do so in a manner that could vary significantly from that of NetEase.

We may have conflicts of interest with NetEase and, because of NetEase’s controlling ownership interest in our company, we may not be able to resolve such conflicts on terms favorable to us.

Conflict of interest may arise between NetEase and us in a number of areas relating to our ongoing relationships. Potential conflicts of interest that we have identified mainly include the following:

Our financial contribution to NetEase was not material during the periods presented in this annual report, and NetEase may from time to time make strategic decisions that it believes are in the best interests of its business as a whole, which may be different from the decisions that we would have made on our own. NetEase’s decisions with respect to us or our business may favor NetEase and therefore the NetEase shareholders, which may not necessarily be aligned with our interests and the interests of our other shareholders. NetEase may make decisions, or suffer adverse trends, that may disrupt or discontinue our collaborations with NetEase or our access to NetEase’s user base. Furthermore, if NetEase seeks to alter or violate the terms of the non-competition agreement with us in order to compete with us, such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor in light of NetEase’s controlling interest in us. If NetEase were to compete with us, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Although we are now a stand-alone public company and have an audit committee, consisting of independent non-executive directors, to review and approve all proposed related party transactions including those between NetEase and us, we may not be able to resolve all potential conflicts of interest, and even if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with a non-controlling shareholder.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

There are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations, and rules relating to the agreements that establish the VIE structure for our and the VIEs’ operations in China, including potential future actions pursuant to the laws and regulations in force at that time, which could affect the enforceability of our contractual arrangements with the VIEs and, consequently, significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations. If the PRC government finds our contractual arrangements non-compliant with relevant PRC laws, regulations, and rules, or if these laws, regulations, and rules or the interpretation thereof change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in the VIEs.

Foreign investment in the value-added telecommunication services industry and certain other business in China is extensively regulated and subject to numerous restrictions or prohibitions. Pursuant to the latest list of special management measures for the market entry of foreign investment, or the Negative List, published by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of Commerce and effective on November 1, 2024, with a few exceptions, foreign investors are generally not allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added telecommunication service provider.

We are a Cayman Islands company and our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries are currently considered foreign-invested enterprise. Accordingly, our PRC subsidiaries are not eligible to provide value-added telecommunication services and certain other business in China. To ensure strict compliance with the PRC laws and regulations, we conduct such business activities through our wholly owned subsidiaries in China, have entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders, which enable us to (i) be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, (ii) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs, and (iii) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests and assets in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we have been considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes and hence consolidate their financial results as the VIEs under U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions of the VIEs under the U.S. GAAP are satisfied. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.C. Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs and the VIEs’ Respective Shareholders” for further details.

If the PRC government finds that our contractual arrangements for operating our value-added telecommunication services and other business do not comply with its restrictions on foreign investment in such business, or if the PRC government otherwise finds that we or the VIEs are in violation of PRC laws or regulations or lack the necessary permits or licenses to operate our and the VIEs’ business, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities, including the MIIT and SAIC, would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations or failures, including, without limitation:

Any of these actions could cause significant disruptions to our and the VIEs’ business operations and severely damage our reputation, which would in turn materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new PRC laws, regulations, and rules may be introduced to impose additional requirements, posing additional challenges to our corporate structure and contractual arrangements. For example, the General Office of State Council and the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China jointly promulgated the Alleviating Burden Opinion on July 24, 2021, which provides, among others, that (i) Academic AST Institutions are prohibited from raising funds by listing on stock markets or conducting any capitalization activities; and (ii) foreign capital is prohibited from controlling or participating in any Academic AST Institutions through mergers and acquisitions, entrusted operation, joining franchise or variable interest entities. The Alleviating Burden Opinion provides that any violation of the foregoing shall be rectified. The Alleviating Burden Opinion further states that the administration and supervision over academic subjects tutoring institutions for students in grades 10 to 12 shall be implemented by reference to the relevant provisions of the Alleviating Burden Opinion. In February 2022, the MOE issued its 2022 Work Plan which provides that the supervision of AST institutions for students in grades 10 to 12 shall be strictly carried out “with reference to” the relevant provisions as set forth in the Alleviating Burden Opinion. It remains uncertain as to how and to what extent the administration over academic subjects tutoring institutions for students in grades 10 to 12 will be implemented by reference of the Alleviating Burden Opinion.

We have conducted a series of compliance measures regarding the Alleviating Burden Opinion and the relevant implementation measures. As of the date of this annual report, we no longer offer AST courses on academic subjects for students receiving compulsory education or for high-school students. We may take further necessary measures to comply with the current and future PRC laws and regulations. We believe, to the best of our knowledge, our contractual arrangements do not violate any applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in force in all material aspects. However, the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws and regulations are subject to changes and may evolve from time to time, thus we cannot preclude the possibility that the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to us. If any of these occurrences results in our inability to direct the activities of the VIEs or our failure to receive the economic benefits from the VIEs and/or our inability to claim our contractual control rights over the assets of the VIEs that conduct substantially all of our and the VIEs’ operations in China, we may not be able to consolidate the entity in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and cause our ADSs to significantly decline in value or become worthless.

Any failure by the VIEs or their shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Since PRC laws prohibit or restrict foreign equity ownership in certain kinds of business in China, we have relied and expect to continue to rely on the contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders to operate our business in China.

However, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective as equity ownership in providing us with control over the VIEs. Any of the VIEs and its respective shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct their operations in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests. In the event that the shareholders of the VIEs breach the terms of these contractual arrangements and voluntarily liquidate the VIEs, or the VIEs declares bankruptcy and all or part of its assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, or are otherwise disposed of without our consent, we may be unable to conduct some or all of our business operations or otherwise benefit from the assets held by our affiliated entities, which could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Most of the nominee shareholders of the VIEs are also beneficial owners of the company. Particularly, nominee shareholders of the VIEs are Mr. Feng Zhou, Chief Executive Officer and a shareholder of the company, Mr. Lei Ding, the chief executive officer, director and the largest shareholder of NetEase. Inc., our controlling shareholder, and Mr. Yinghui Wu, the Senior Vice President and a shareholder of the company. The enforceability of the contractual agreements between us, the VIEs and their shareholders depends to a large extent upon whether the VIEs and their shareholders will fulfill these contractual agreements. Their interests in enforcing these contractual agreements may not align with our interests or the interests of our shareholders. If their interest diverges from that of our company and other shareholders, it may potentially increase the risk that they could seek to act contrary to these contractual arrangements. If any of the VIEs or their shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may be limited in our ability to enforce the contractual arrangements that allow us to be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, and our ability to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs may be affected. We may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and contractual remedies, which we cannot assure you will be sufficient or effective under PRC law. In addition, if any third parties claim any interest in such shareholders’ equity interests in any of the VIEs, our ability to exercise shareholders’ rights or foreclose the share pledge according to the contractual arrangements may be impaired. If these or other disputes between the shareholders of the VIEs and third parties were to impair the contractual arrangements, our ability to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs would be affected, which would in turn result in a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition. Our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through litigation in China. Accordingly, these agreements would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures, and these procedures could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Meanwhile, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a VIE should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law.

In addition, the shareholders of the VIEs may be involved in personal disputes with third parties or other incidents that may have an adverse effect on their respective equity interests in the VIEs and the validity or enforceability of the contractual arrangements. For instance, in the event that such shareholder divorces his or her spouse, the spouse may claim that the equity interest of the VIEs held by such shareholder is part of their marital or community property and should be divided between such shareholder and his or her spouse. If such claim is supported by the competent court, the relevant equity interest may be obtained by the shareholder’s spouse or another third party who is not bound by our contractual arrangements, which could result in our losing effective control over the VIEs. Even if we receive a consent letter from the spouse of a nominee shareholder of the VIEs where such spouse undertakes that he or she would not take any actions to interfere with the contractual arrangements through which we control such VIEs, including by claiming that the equity interest of the VIEs held by such shareholder is part of their marital or community property, we cannot assure you that these undertakings will be complied with or effectively enforced. In the event that any of them is breached or becomes unenforceable and leads to legal proceedings, it could disrupt our business, distract our management’s attention and subject us to substantial uncertainties as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings. Similarly, if any of the equity interests of the VIEs are inherited by a third party on whom the current contractual arrangements are not binding, we could lose our control over the VIEs or have to maintain such control at unpredictable cost, which could cause significant disruption to our business operations and harm our financial condition and results of operations.

There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such adjudication should legal action become necessary. In the event that we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected.

Our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations may be affected by the Foreign Investment Law.

On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress of the PRC promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. The enacted Foreign Investment Law does not mention concepts such as “actual control” and “controlling PRC companies by contracts or trusts” that were included in the previous drafts, nor did it specify regulation on controlling through contractual arrangements, and thus this regulatory topic remains unclear under the Foreign Investment Law. However, though the Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, it contains a catch-all provision under the definition of “foreign investment,” which includes investments made by foreign investors in China through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, such as unwinding our existing contractual arrangements and/or disposal of our related business operations, we cannot assure you whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders for a large portion of our business operations which may not be as effective as equity ownership in providing operational control.

We primarily have relied and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders to operate our business in China. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as equity ownership in providing us with control over the VIEs. For example, the VIEs and their shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct their operations in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests. If we had equity ownership of the VIEs, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of directors of the VIEs, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance by the VIEs and their shareholders of their respective obligations. The shareholders of the VIEs may not act in the best interests of our company or may not perform their obligations under these contracts. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate certain portions of our business through the contractual arrangements with the VIEs. If any disputes relating to these contracts remain unresolved, we will have to enforce our rights under these contracts through the operations of PRC law and arbitration, litigation and other legal proceedings. Therefore, our contractual arrangements with the VIEs may not be as effective as equity ownership would be in ensuring our control over the relevant portion of our business operations.

Our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law, and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures.

The evolving nature of the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Meanwhile, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a VIE should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. The tribunal may by their discretion in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations decide the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC law, rulings by arbitrators are final, parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts, which would require additional expenses and delay. In the event we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delays or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes, and our ability to conduct our and the VIEs’ business may be negatively affected.

The shareholders of the VIEs may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The shareholders of the VIEs may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us. These shareholders may refuse to sign or breach, or cause the VIEs to breach, or refuse to renew, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and the VIEs, which would have a material and adverse effect on our ability to be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes and receive economic benefits from them. For example, the shareholders may be able to cause our agreements with the VIEs to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor. Currently, we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

Contractual arrangements in relation to the VIEs may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or the VIEs owe additional taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the value of your investment.

Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities within ten years after the taxable year when the transactions are conducted. We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the VIE contractual arrangements were not entered into on an arm’s-length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust the income of the VIEs in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by the VIEs for PRC tax purposes, which could in turn increase its tax liabilities without reducing our PRC subsidiaries’ tax expenses. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on the VIEs for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the VIEs’ tax liabilities increase or if it is required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.

We may lose the ability to use, or otherwise benefit from, the licenses, approvals and assets held by the VIEs, which could severely disrupt our business, render us unable to conduct some or all of our business operations and constrain our growth.

As part of our contractual arrangements with the VIEs, the VIEs hold certain assets, licenses and permits that are material to their business operations, such as the ICP License. The contractual arrangements contain terms that specifically obligate VIEs’ shareholders to ensure the valid existence of the VIEs and restrict the disposal of material assets of the VIEs. However, in the event the VIEs’ shareholders breach the terms of these contractual arrangements and voluntarily liquidate the VIEs, or the VIEs declare bankruptcy and all or part of its assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, or are otherwise disposed of without our consent, we may be unable to conduct some or all of our business operations or otherwise benefit from the assets held by the VIEs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if any of the VIEs undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, its shareholders or unrelated third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of the assets of such VIE, thereby hindering our ability to operate our business as well as constrain our growth.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

Changes in economic, political or social conditions or government policies in China or globally could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business and operations.

Substantially all of our and the VIEs’ assets and operations are located in China. Accordingly, our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by political, economic and social conditions in China generally. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China or globally, in the policies, laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of the countries where we operate. Such developments could adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and operating results, lead to a reduction in demand for our services and adversely affect our competitive position. Any prolonged slowdown in the Chinese or global economy may reduce the demand for our products and services and materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system, including uncertainties regarding the enforcement of laws, and rules and regulations in China that can change quickly with little advance notice, could adversely affect us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system prior court decisions under the civil law system may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value.

In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general. The overall effect of legislation over the past three decades has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, China has not developed a fully integrated legal system, and recently enacted laws and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in China. In particular, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy. These uncertainties may affect our judgment on the relevance of legal requirements and our ability to enforce our contractual rights or tort claims. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited or frivolous legal actions or threats in attempts to extract payments or benefits from us.

The PRC government has significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our and the VIEs’ business and may intervene with or influence our and the VIEs’ operations as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals.

The PRC government has recently published new policies that adversely affected our industry and our and the VIEs’ business, and we cannot rule out the possibility that it will in the future further release regulations or policies regarding our industry that could further adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the PRC government has also recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over securities offerings and other capital markets activities that are conducted overseas and foreign investment in China-based companies like us. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or in extreme cases, become worthless.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with new laws and regulations in all respects, and we may be ordered to rectify, suspend or terminate any actions or services that are deemed illegal by the regulatory authorities and become subject to material penalties, which may materially harm our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of any of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. In addition, any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

The PRC government may intervene or influence our and the VIEs’ operations at any time, or may exert more control over our future overseas offerings or foreign investments in us, which could result in a material change in our and the VIEs’ operation and the value of our ADSs.

We conduct our business primarily through our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs and their subsidiaries in China. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. The PRC government has significant oversight and discretion over the operation of our and the VIEs’ business, and it may intervene or influence our and the VIEs’ operations at any time, which could result in a material adverse change in our and the VIEs’ operation and the value of our ADSs.

The PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight over overseas offerings by and/or foreign investments in China-based issuers like us. For example, on February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report relevant information to the CSRC. In addition, domestic companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures are required to file with the CSRC within three working days after such domestic company completes a subsequent security offering on the foreign stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Since the Overseas Listing Trial Measures was newly promulgated, its interpretation, application and enforcement remain unclear. If the filing procedure with the CSRC under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures is required for any future offerings, listing or any other capital raising activities by us, it is uncertain whether we could complete the filing procedure in a timely manner, or at all.

In addition, on December 28, 2021, the CAC published the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network products and services, and platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list abroad must apply for cybersecurity review. There are uncertainties as to the interpretation, application, and enforcement of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures and whether to conduct a security offering or maintain our listing status on the NYSE will be subject to the cybersecurity review procedures.

It remains uncertain how PRC government authorities will regulate overseas listing in general and whether we are required to complete filing or obtain any specific regulatory approvals from the CSRC, CAC or any other PRC government authorities for our overseas offerings. If the CSRC, CAC or other government authorities later promulgate new rules or explanations requiring that we obtain their approvals for our future overseas offerings or maintain the listing status of our ADS, we may be unable to obtain such approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, implementation of industry-wide regulations affecting our and the VIEs’ operations could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors of our company and our and the VIEs’ business face potential uncertainty from actions taken by the PRC government affecting our and the VIEs’ business.

You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions outside the United States against us or our management named in the annual report based on foreign laws.

We are a Cayman Islands company and currently conduct substantially all business operations in China through our subsidiaries incorporated in the PRC and the contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs. Substantially all of our and the VIEs’ assets are outside of the United States. In addition, most of our senior executive officers reside outside of the United States for a significant portion of the time and most are not United States nationals. We do not have any material operations or assets in the United States. There are also uncertainties regarding the status of the rights of the Youdao, Inc., our Cayman Islands holding company, with respect to our contractual arrangements with the VIEs, our founders and shareholders. As a result, it may be difficult for our shareholders to effect service of process upon us or those persons inside China, including Hong Kong. In addition, neither China nor Hong Kong has treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the Cayman Islands and many other countries and regions. Therefore, recognition and enforcement outside the United States of judgments obtained in a U.S. court in relation to any matter not subject to a binding arbitration provision may be difficult or impossible.

In the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanisms, it is generally difficult for any country to provide the necessary information for regulatory investigations or lawsuits initiated overseas. Cross-border shareholder claims or regulatory investigation generally are difficult to pursue and enforce as a matter of law or practicality in China. For example, in China, there are legal requirements to obtaining information needed for shareholder investigations or litigation outside China or otherwise with respect to foreign entities. Although the local authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the Unities States have not been efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. No organization or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to overseas parties arbitrarily without the consent of the competent securities regulatory authority in China according to the PRC Securities Law. See also “—Risks Related to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.”

We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

We are a Cayman Islands holding company and we rely principally on dividends and other distributions on equity from our PRC subsidiaries for our cash requirements, including for services of any debt we may incur. The ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions on equity, in turn, depends on the payment they receive from the VIEs as service fees pursuant to certain contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiaries, the VIEs and the VIEs’ shareholders entered into to comply with certain restriction under PRC law on foreign investment. Investors in our securities should note that, to the extent cash in the business is in the PRC or a PRC entity, the funds may not be available to fund operations or for other use outside of the PRC due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations on the ability of Youdao, Inc. or its subsidiaries, or the VIEs by the PRC government to transfer cash. For more information about such contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.C. Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs and the VIEs’ Respective Shareholders.”

Our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends is based upon their distributable earnings. Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to their respective shareholders only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs are required to set aside at least 10% of their after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of their registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to distribute dividends or other payments to their respective shareholders could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our businesses, pay dividends or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

To address the persistent capital outflow and the RMB’s depreciation against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the People’s Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures in the subsequent months, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. For instance, the Circular on Promoting the Reform of Foreign Exchange Management and Improving Authenticity and Compliance Review, or the SAFE Circular 3, issued on January 26, 2017, provides that the banks shall, when dealing with dividend remittance transactions from domestic enterprise to its offshore shareholders of more than US$50,000, review the relevant board resolutions, original tax filing form and audited financial statements of such domestic enterprise based on the principal of genuine transaction. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls and our PRC subsidiaries’ dividends and other distributions may be subject to tightened scrutiny in the future. Any regulation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

In addition, the Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules provide that a withholding tax at a rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless reduced under treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC resident enterprises are tax resident.

The custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible assets, including chops and seals, may fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets.

Under the PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts are executed using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with relevant PRC industry and commerce authorities.

In order to secure the use of our chops and seals, we have established internal control procedures and rules for using these chops and seals. In any event that the chops and seals are intended to be used, the responsible personnel will submit the application which will then be verified and approved by authorized employees in accordance with our internal control procedures and rules. In addition, in order to maintain the physical security of our chops, we generally have them stored in secured locations accessible only to authorized employees. Although we monitor such authorized employees, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. There is a risk that our employees could abuse their authority, for example, by entering into a contract not approved by us or seeking to gain control of one of our subsidiaries or VIEs. If any employee obtains and misuses or misappropriates our chops and seals or other controlling non-tangible assets for whatever reason, we could experience disruption to our normal business operations. We may have to take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve and divert management from our operations.

PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay us from making loans or additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries and to make loans to the VIEs, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our and the VIEs’ business.

Any funds we transfer to our PRC subsidiaries, either as a shareholder loan or as an increase in registered capital, as well as any foreign loans we provide to the VIEs, are subject to approval by or registration with relevant governmental authorities in China. According to the relevant PRC regulations on foreign-invested enterprises, or FIEs, in China, capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries are subject to the reporting with the Ministry of Commerce, or MOFCOM, or its local branches and registration with a local bank authorized by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE. In addition, (i) any foreign loan procured by our PRC subsidiaries is required to be registered with SAFE or its local branches and (ii) any of our PRC subsidiaries may not procure loans which exceed the difference between its total investment amount and registered capital or, as an alternative, only procure loans subject to the calculation approach and limitation as provided in the Notice of the People’s Bank of China on Matters concerning the Macro-Prudential Management of Full-Covered Cross-Border Financing, or the PBOC Notice No. 9. Additionally, any medium or long-term loans to be provided by us to the VIEs must be registered with the NDRC and the SAFE or its local branches. We may not be able to obtain these government approvals or complete such registrations on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future capital contributions or foreign loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries or loans by us to the VIEs. If we fail to receive such approvals or complete such reporting, registration or filing, our ability to use the proceeds of our overseas financing activities and to capitalize our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our and the VIEs’ business. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.A. History and Development of the Company—Our Corporate History.”

On March 30, 2015, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, which took effect as of June 1, 2015. SAFE Circular 19 launched a nationwide reform of the administration of the settlement of the foreign exchange capitals of FIEs and allows FIEs to settle their foreign exchange capital at their discretion but continues to prohibit FIEs from using the Renminbi fund converted from their foreign exchange capital for expenditure beyond their business scopes, providing entrusted loans or repaying loans between nonfinancial enterprises. The SAFE issued the Circular on Reforming and Regulating Policies on the Control over Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital Accounts, or SAFE Circular 16, effective in June 2016. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 16, enterprises registered in China may also convert their foreign debts from foreign currency to Renminbi on a self-discretionary basis. SAFE Circular 16 provides an integrated standard for conversion of foreign exchange under capital account items (including but not limited to foreign currency capital and foreign debts) on a self-discretionary basis which applies to all enterprises registered in China. SAFE Circular 16 reiterates the principle that Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital of a company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope or prohibited by PRC laws or regulations, while such converted Renminbi shall not be provided as loans to its non-affiliated entities. On October 23, 2019, SAFE issued Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Promoting the Facilitation of Cross-border Trade and Investment, or the Circular 28. Circular 28 allows non-investment foreign-invested enterprises to use their capital funds to make equity investments in China, provided that such investments do not violate the Negative List and the target investment projects are genuine and in compliance with PRC laws. However, there remains uncertainty as to the interpretation and application of Circular 28 and any other future foreign exchange related rules. Violations of these Circulars could result in severe monetary or other penalties. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to use Renminbi converted from the net proceeds of our initial public offering, the concurrent private placements to Orbis and follow-on offering to fund the establishment of new entities in China by the VIEs, to invest in or acquire any other PRC companies through our PRC subsidiaries, or to establish new VIEs in China, which may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements and the inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditor in the past has deprived our investors with the benefits of such inspections.

Our auditor, the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. The auditor is located in mainland China, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB was historically unable to conduct inspections and investigations completely before 2022. As a result, we and our investors in the ADSs were deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in mainland China in the past has made it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of mainland China that are subject to the PCAOB inspections. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination and removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. However, if the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we and investors in our ADSs would be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections, which could cause investors and potential investors in the ADSs to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements.

Our ADSs may be prohibited from trading in the United States under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, or the HFCAA, in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely auditors located in China. The delisting of the ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

Pursuant to the HFCAA, if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years because of a position taken by authorities in a foreign jurisdiction, the SEC will prohibit our shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States.

On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong and our auditor was subject to that determination. In May 2022, the SEC conclusively listed us as a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA following the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. For this reason, we were not at risk of having our securities subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCAA unless a new determination is made by the PCAOB.

Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year and would be at risk of having our securities subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCAA. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if we are identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years in the future. If our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no certainty that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our securities will develop outside of the United States. A prohibition of being able to trade in the United States would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of our ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and by China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things. In July 2005, the PRC government changed its decades-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar, and the Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation subsided and the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. While appreciating approximately by 7% against the U.S. dollar in 2017, the Renminbi in 2018 and 2019 depreciated approximately by 5% and 1% against the U.S. dollar, respectively. Since October 1, 2016, the RMB has joined the International Monetary Fund’s basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right, along with the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system and there is no guarantee that the RMB will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.

Substantially all of our revenue and costs are denominated in Renminbi. We are a holding company and we rely on dividends paid by our operating subsidiaries in China for our cash needs. Any significant revaluation of Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial position reported in Renminbi when translated into U.S. dollars, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, the ADSs in U.S. dollars.

Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes control on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company primarily relies on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval of SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Specifically, under the existing exchange restrictions, without prior approval of SAFE, cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries in China may be used to pay dividends to our company. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, we need to obtain SAFE approval to use cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs to pay off their respective debt in a currency other than Renminbi owed to entities outside China, or to make other capital expenditure payments outside China in a currency other than Renminbi. The PRC government may in the future restrict access to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders, including holders of the ADSs.

Certain PRC regulations may make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions.

Among other things, the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex. Such regulation requires, among other things, that the MOFCOM be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor acquires control of a PRC domestic enterprise or a foreign company with substantial PRC operations, if certain thresholds under the Provisions on Thresholds for Prior Notification of Concentrations of Undertakings, issued by the State Council in 2008 and lastly amended in 2024, are triggered. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law promulgated by the SCNPC which became effective in 2008 and was last amended on June 24, 2022 requires that transactions which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified turnover thresholds must be cleared by the MOFCOM before they can be completed. On February 7, 2021, the Anti-Monopoly Commission of the State Council promulgated the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines for the Internet Platform Economy Sector that aims at specifying some of the circumstances under which an activity of internet platforms may be identified as monopolistic act as well as clarifying that concentration of undertakings involving VIE structure shall be subject to anti-monopoly review. In addition, PRC national security review rules which became effective in September 2011 require acquisitions by foreign investors of PRC companies engaged in military related or certain other industries that are crucial to national security be subject to security review before consummation of any such acquisition. Further, the Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investments promulgated by the NDRC and MOFCOM which became effective from January 2021 requires that security review by relevant governmental authorities shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Measures for foreign investments that affect or may affect national security. We may pursue potential strategic acquisitions that are complementary to our business and operations. Complying with the requirements of these regulations to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval or clearance from the MOFCOM, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiaries to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to increase their registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.

In July 2014, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment Through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37, to replace the Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Residents’ Financing and Roundtrip Investment Through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 75, which ceased to be effective upon the promulgation of SAFE Circular 37. SAFE Circular 37 requires PRC residents (including PRC individuals and PRC corporate entities) to register with SAFE or its local branches in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. SAFE Circular 37 is applicable to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may be applicable to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future.

SAFE Circular 37 requires registration with, and approval from, Chinese government authorities in connection with direct or indirect control of an offshore entity by PRC residents. The term “control” under SAFE Circular 37 is broadly defined as the operation rights, beneficiary rights or decision-making rights acquired by PRC residents in the offshore special purpose vehicles by means of acquisition, trust, proxy, voting rights, repurchase, convertible bonds or other arrangements. In addition, any PRC resident who is a direct or indirect shareholder of an SPV is required to update its filed registration with the local branch of SAFE with respect to that SPV, to reflect any material change. Moreover, any subsidiary of such SPV in China is required to urge the PRC resident shareholders to update their registration with the local branch of SAFE. If any PRC shareholder of such SPV fails to make the required registration or to update the previously filed registration, the subsidiary of such SPV in China may be prohibited from distributing its profits or the proceeds from any capital reduction, share transfer or liquidation to the SPV, and the SPV may also be prohibited from making additional capital contributions into its subsidiary in China. On February 13, 2015, the SAFE promulgated a Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving Foreign Exchange Administration Policy on Direct Investment, or SAFE Notice 13, which became effective on June 1, 2015. Under SAFE Notice 13, applications for foreign exchange registration of inbound foreign direct investments and outbound overseas direct investments, including those required under SAFE Circular 37, will be filed with qualified banks instead of SAFE. The qualified banks will directly examine the applications and accept registrations under the supervision of SAFE. SAFE Notice 13 further provides that annual inspection of inbound foreign direct investments and outbound overseas direct investments is canceled. Instead, relevant entities or individuals, as the case may be, shall register data and information with respect to their inbound foreign direct investments and outbound overseas direct investment interests with SAFE.

These regulations may have a significant impact on our present and future structuring and investment. We have requested our shareholders who to our knowledge are PRC residents to make the necessary applications, filings and amendments as required under these regulations. We intend to take all necessary measures to ensure that all required applications and filings will be duly made and all other requirements will be met. We further intend to structure and execute our future offshore acquisitions in a manner consistent with these regulations and any other relevant legislation. However, because it is presently uncertain how the SAFE regulations, and any future legislation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted and implemented by the relevant government authorities in connection with restructuring by PRC beneficial owners of our company, our future offshore financings or acquisitions, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to comply with, qualify under, or obtain any approvals required by the regulations or other legislation. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that any PRC beneficial owners of our company or any PRC company into which we invest is or will in the future be able to comply with those requirements. Any failure or inability by such individuals to comply with SAFE regulations may subject us to fines or legal sanctions, such as restrictions on our cross-border investment activities or our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to, or obtain foreign exchange-denominated loans from, our company or prevent us from making distributions or paying dividends. As a result, our business operations and our ability to make distributions to you could be materially and adversely affected.

Furthermore, as the interpretation and implementation of these foreign exchange regulations has been constantly evolving, we cannot assure you how these regulations, and any future regulation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted, amended and implemented by the relevant government authorities. For example, we may be subject to a more stringent review and approval process with respect to our foreign exchange activities, such as remittance of dividends and foreign-currency-denominated borrowings, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we decide to acquire a PRC domestic company, we cannot assure you that we or the owners of such company, as the case may be, will be able to obtain the necessary approvals or complete the necessary filings and registrations required by the foreign exchange regulations. This may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Any failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock incentive plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

In February 2012, SAFE promulgated the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly Listed Company, replacing earlier rules promulgated in 2007. Pursuant to these rules, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year who participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company, subject to a few exceptions, are required to register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiaries of such overseas-listed company, and complete certain other procedures. In addition, an overseas-entrusted institution must be retained to handle matters in connection with the exercise or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and interests. We and our executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year and who have been granted options are subject to these regulations. Failure to complete the SAFE registrations may subject them to fines and legal sanctions, there may be additional restrictions on the ability of them to exercise their stock options or remit proceeds gained from sale of their stock into the PRC. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees under PRC law. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Related to Stock Incentive Plans.”

If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders and ADS holders.

Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to the enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In 2009, the State Taxation Administration, or STA, issued a circular, known as STA Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the STA’s general position on how the “de facto management body” text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises. According to STA Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China, and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the primary location of the day-to-day operational management is in the PRC; (ii) decisions relating to the enterprise’s financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC; (iii) the enterprise’s primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions are located or maintained in the PRC; and (iv) at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC.

We believe our company is not a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If the PRC tax authorities determine that our company is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, we will be subject to PRC enterprise income on our worldwide income at the rate of 25%. Furthermore, we will be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises, including the holders of the ADSs. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders (including our ADS holders) may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 10% on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, if such gains are treated as derived from a PRC source. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends paid to our non-PRC individual shareholders (including our ADS holders) and any gain realized on the transfer of ADSs or ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20% (which, in the case of dividends, may be withheld at source by us). These rates may be reduced by an applicable tax treaty, but it is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of our company would, in practice, be able to obtain the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs or ordinary shares.

We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

On February 3, 2015, the STA issued the Public Notice Regarding Certain Corporate Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-Tax Resident Enterprises, or STA Bulletin 7. STA Bulletin 7 extends its tax jurisdiction to transactions involving the transfer of taxable assets through offshore transfer of a foreign intermediate holding company. In addition, STA Bulletin 7 has introduced safe harbors for internal group restructurings and the purchase and sale of equity securities through a public securities market. STA Bulletin 7 also brings challenges to both foreign transferor and transferee (or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer) of taxable assets.

On October 17, 2017, the STA issued the Announcement of the State Taxation Administration on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or STA Bulletin 37, which came into effect on December 1, 2017. The STA Bulletin 37 further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of non-resident enterprise income tax.

Where a non-resident enterprise transfers taxable assets indirectly by disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, which is an Indirect Transfer, the non-resident enterprise as either transferor or transferee, or the PRC entity that directly owns the taxable assets, may report such Indirect Transfer to the relevant tax authority. Using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of 10% for the transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise. Both the transferor and the transferee may be subject to penalties under PRC tax laws if the transferee fails to withhold the taxes and the transferor fails to pay the taxes.

We face uncertainties as to the reporting and other implications of certain past and future transactions where PRC taxable assets are involved, such as offshore restructuring, sale of the shares in our offshore subsidiaries and investments. Our company may be subject to filing obligations or taxed if our company is transferor in such transactions, and may be subject to withholding obligations if our company is transferee in such transactions, under STA Bulletin 7 and/or STA Bulletin 37. For transfer of shares in our company by investors who are non-PRC resident enterprises, our PRC subsidiaries may be requested to assist in the filing under STA Bulletin 7 and/or STA Bulletin 37. As a result, we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with STA Bulletin 7 and/or STA Bulletin 37 or to request the relevant transferors from whom we purchase taxable assets to comply with these circulars, or to establish that our company should not be taxed under these circulars, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Proceedings instituted by the SEC against Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

In December 2012, the SEC instituted administrative proceedings against the Big Four PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, alleging that these firms had violated U.S. securities laws and the SEC’s rules and regulations thereunder by failing to provide to the SEC the firms’ audit work papers with respect to certain PRC-based companies that are publicly traded in the United States.

On January 22, 2014, the administrative law judge, or the ALJ, presiding over the matter rendered an initial decision that each of the firms had violated the SEC’s rules of practice by failing to produce audit papers and other documents to the SEC. The initial decision censured each of the firms and barred them from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months.

On February 6, 2015, the four China-based accounting firms each agreed to a censure and to pay a fine to the SEC to settle the dispute and avoid suspension of their ability to practice before the SEC and audit U.S.-listed companies. The settlement required the firms to follow detailed procedures and to seek to provide the SEC with access to Chinese firms’ audit documents via the CSRC. Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceeding against the four China-based accounting firms was deemed dismissed with prejudice four years after entry of the settlement. The four-year mark occurred on February 6, 2019. While we cannot predict if the SEC will further challenge the four China-based accounting firms’ compliance with U.S. law in connection with U.S. regulatory requests for audit work papers or if the results of such a challenge would result in the SEC imposing penalties such as suspensions, if the accounting firms are subject to additional remedial measures, our ability to file our financial statements in compliance with SEC requirements could be impacted. A determination that we have not timely filed financial statements in compliance with the SEC requirements could ultimately lead to the delisting of our ADSs from the NYSE or the termination of the registration of our ordinary shares under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our ADSs in the United States.

Regulation of information disseminated over the internet in China may adversely affect our business and reputation and subject us to liability for information displayed on our website.

The PRC government has adopted regulations governing internet access and the distribution of news and other information over the internet. Under these regulations, internet content providers and internet publishers are prohibited from posting or displaying over the internet content that, among other things, violates PRC laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of China, or is reactionary, obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or defamatory. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the revocation of licenses to provide internet content and other licenses, and the closure of the concerned websites. The website operator may also be held liable for such censored information displayed on or linked to the websites. If our platform or content is found to be in violation of any such requirements, we may be penalized by relevant authorities, and our operations or reputation could be adversely affected.

It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigation or collect evidence within China.

In the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanisms, it is generally difficult for any country to provide the necessary information for regulatory investigations or lawsuits initiated overseas. Cross-border shareholder claims or regulatory investigation generally are difficult to pursue and enforce as a matter of law or practicality in China. For example, in China, there are legal requirements to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated outside China. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the Unities States may not be efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. In addition, the Overseas Listing Trial Measures provides, among others, that domestic companies or individuals shall obtain consents from the CSRC and other relevant competent authorities before such domestic companies provide relevant documents and materials required by overseas securities regulators for investigation and collection of evidence. While detailed interpretation of or implementation rules under Article 177 and the above-mentioned provision of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures have yet to be promulgated, the inability for an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within China and the required prior consent from the CSRC may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests.

Risks Related to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights may adversely affect the value and liquidity of the ADSs.

We cannot predict whether our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will result in a lower or more volatile market price of the ADSs, in adverse publicity, or other adverse consequences. Certain index providers have announced restrictions on including companies with multiple-class share structures in certain of their indices. In the past, certain index providers and shareholder advisory firms have expressed opposition to multi-class share structures, with some excluding companies with multi-class share structures from their indices or raising concerns about their corporate governance. Because of our dual-class structure, we will likely be excluded from these indices and other stock indices that take similar actions. Given the sustained flow of investment funds into passive strategies that seek to track certain indices, exclusion from certain stock indices would likely preclude investment by many of these funds and could make the ADSs less attractive to investors. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structure and our dual-class structure may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance, in which case the market price and liquidity of the ADSs could be adversely affected.

The trading price of our ADSs has been volatile and may continue to be volatile, regardless of our operating performance.

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for the ADSs may be highly volatile for factors specific to our own operations, including the following:

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which the ADSs will trade.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the performance and fluctuation of the market prices for internet-related companies and other companies with operations mainly in China in particular, may affect the volatility in the prices of and trading volumes for our ADSs. The securities of some China-based companies that have listed their securities in the United States have experienced significant volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies, including, in some cases, substantial declines in the trading prices of their securities. The trading performances of these companies’ securities may affect the attitudes of investors towards Chinese companies listed in the United States in general, which consequently may impact the trading performance of our ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, any negative news or perceptions about inadequate corporate governance practices or fraudulent accounting, corporate structure or other matters of other Chinese companies may also negatively affect the attitudes of investors towards Chinese companies in general, including us, regardless of whether we have engaged in any inappropriate activities. In particular, the global financial crisis, the ensuing economic recessions and deterioration in the credit market in many countries have contributed and may continue to contribute to extreme volatility in the global stock markets. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our ADSs. Volatility or a lack of positive performance in our ADS price may also adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, most of whom have been granted options or other equity incentives.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the ADSs will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price or trading volume for the ADSs to decline.

The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of ADSs could adversely affect their market price.

Sales of substantial amounts of ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the ADSs and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings in the future. As of March 31, 2026, we had 32,646,271 Class A ordinary shares (excluding 5,334,815 Class A ordinary shares repurchased in the form of ADSs) and 87,988,360 Class B ordinary shares outstanding. The ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares sold in our initial public offering are freely transferable by persons other than our “affiliates” without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act. The remaining ordinary shares outstanding will be available for sale, subject to volume and other restrictions as applicable under Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act. We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of securities held by our significant shareholders or any other shareholder or the availability of these securities for future sale will have on the market price of the ADSs.

Techniques employed by short sellers may drive down the market price of the ADSs.

Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is in the short seller’s interest for the price of the security to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects in order to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a security short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of shares in the market.

Public companies that have substantially all of their operations in China have been the subject of short selling. Much of the scrutiny and negative publicity has centered on allegations of a lack of effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result, many of these companies are now conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations and, in the interim, are subject to shareholder lawsuits and/or enforcement actions by the SEC or other U.S. authorities.

It is not clear what effect such negative publicity could have on us. If we were to become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we could have to expend a significant amount of resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves. While we would strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short seller by principles of freedom of speech, applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could be costly and time-consuming, and could distract our management from growing our business. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven to be groundless, allegations against us could severely impact our business operations, and any investment in the ADSs could be greatly reduced or even rendered worthless.

Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on a price appreciation of the ADSs for a return on your investment.

We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in the ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.

Our Board of Directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain requirements of Cayman Islands law. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our Board of Directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. There is no guarantee that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in our ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands, or the Companies Act, and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by our minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England and Wales, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands have a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States. In addition, while under Delaware law, controlling shareholders owe fiduciary duties to the companies they control and their minority shareholders, under Cayman Islands law, our controlling shareholders do not owe any such fiduciary duties to our company or to our minority shareholders. Accordingly, our controlling shareholders may exercise their powers as shareholders, including the exercise of voting rights in respect of their shares, in such manner as they think fit, subject only to very limited equitable constraints, including that the exercise of voting rights to amend the memorandum or articles of association of a Cayman company must be exercised in good faith for the benefit of the company as a whole.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records (other than the memorandum and articles of association, the register of mortgages and charges, any special resolution passed by the shareholders and a list of the names of the current directors upon a payment made to the Cayman Registrar) or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our MAA to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. If we choose to follow home country practice, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by our management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are an exempted company limited by shares incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Substantially all of our current operations are conducted in China. In addition, most of our current directors and officers are Chinese nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. Most of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers. However, the deposit agreement gives you the right to submit claims against us to binding arbitration, and arbitration awards may be enforceable against us and our assets in China even when court judgments are not.

ADSs holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial for any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws.

If we or the depositary were to oppose a jury trial based on this waiver, the court would have to determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of the case in accordance with applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, or by a federal or state court in the City of New York, which has non-exclusive jurisdiction over matters arising under the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this would be the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before investing in the ADSs.

If you or any other holders or beneficial owners of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us or the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have, including outcomes that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or the ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance with any substantive provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to direct the voting of the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs.

As a Cayman Islands exempted company, we are not obliged by the Companies Act to call shareholders’ annual general meetings. Our MAA provides that we may (but are not obliged to) each year hold a general meeting as our annual general meeting. As a holder of ADSs, you will not have any direct right to attend general meetings of our shareholders or to cast any votes at such meetings. You will only be able to exercise the voting rights which attach to the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs indirectly by giving voting instructions to the depositary in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you may vote only by giving voting instructions to the depositary, as holder of the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs. Upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary may try to vote the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs in accordance with your instructions. If we ask for your instructions, then upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares in accordance with those instructions. If we do not instruct the depositary to ask for your instructions, the depositary may still vote in accordance with instructions you give, but it is not required to do so. You will not be able to directly exercise any right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares unless you withdraw the shares and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice of the meeting to enable you to withdraw the shares underlying your ADSs and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting to allow you to attend the general meeting and to vote directly with respect to any specific matter or resolution to be considered and voted upon at the general meeting. In addition, under our MAA, for the purposes of determining those shareholders who are entitled to attend and vote at any general meeting, our directors may close our register of members and/or fix in advance a record date for such meeting, and such closure of our register of members or the setting of such a record date may prevent you from withdrawing the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs and becoming the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date, so that you would not be able to attend the general meeting or to vote directly. Where any matter is to be put to a vote at a general meeting, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and to deliver our voting materials to you, if we ask it to. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting material in time to ensure you can direct the depositary to vote your shares. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the shares underlying your ADSs are voted and you may have no legal remedy if the shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and the ADSs may view as beneficial.

We have adopted a dual-class share structure. Our ordinary shares consist of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. In respect of matters requiring the votes of shareholders, each Class A ordinary share is entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share is entitled to three votes. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof. Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances.

NetEase, Dr. Zhou and certain individual minority shareholders who are our employees collectively beneficially owned all of our issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares as of the date of this annual report. As of March 31, 2026, these Class B ordinary shares constituted approximately 72.9% of our total issued and outstanding share capital and 89.0% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share capital (excluding 5,334,815 Class A ordinary shares repurchased in the form of ADSs). In particular, Class B ordinary shares owned by NetEase constituted approximately 54.2% of our total issued and outstanding share capital and 66.1% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share capital as of March 31, 2026 (excluding 5,334,815 Class A ordinary shares repurchased in the form of ADSs).

As a result of this dual-class share structure and the concentration of ownership, NetEase and the other holders of the Class B ordinary shares as a group will have significant influence over our business, including decisions regarding mergers, consolidations, liquidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. They may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of the ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

You may experience dilution of your holdings due to the inability to participate in rights offerings.

We may, from time to time, distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. However, we cannot make such rights available to you in the United States unless we register both the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs, or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly, holders of the ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result.

You may be subject to limitations on the transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems it expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of our ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to U.S. domestic public companies.

Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

We will be required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis as press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the NYSE. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information, which would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer, which may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigation or collect evidence within China.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and, as a result, can rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.

We are a “controlled company” as defined under the rules of the NYSE since NetEase beneficially owns more than 50% of our total voting power. For so long as we remain a controlled company under this definition, we are permitted to elect to rely, and we currently rely, on certain exemptions from corporate governance rules, including the exemption from the rule that a majority of our board of directors must be independent directors. As a result, you will not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to these corporate governance requirements.

As an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. These practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

As a company listed on the NYSE, we are subject to corporate governance listing standards of NYSE. However, NYSE rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. We have followed and intend to continue to follow Cayman Islands corporate governance practices in lieu of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE that listed companies must have a majority of independent directors and that the audit committee consists of at least three members. To the extent that we choose to follow home country practice in the future, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would enjoy under NYSE corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for the current or any future taxable year, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors in the ADSs or our Class A ordinary shares.

In general, a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year in which (i) 50% or more of the average value of its assets (generally determined on a quarterly basis) consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income, or (ii) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income. For purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that owns (or is treated as owning for U.S. federal income tax purposes), directly or indirectly, at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation and received directly its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents, royalties and certain gains. Cash is a passive asset for these purposes. Goodwill and other intangible assets are generally characterized as active assets to the extent associated with business activities that produce active income.

Based on the composition of our income and assets and the estimated value of our assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets, which is based on the price of the ADSs, we believe that we were not a PFIC for our 2025 taxable year. However, our PFIC status for any taxable year will depend on the composition of our income and assets and the value of our assets from time to time (which may be determined, in large part, by reference to the market price of the ADSs, which has been volatile). Because we hold a substantial amount of cash and financial investments, fluctuations in the market price of our ADSs could cause us to become a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year if the value of our assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets) is determined by reference to our market capitalization. Moreover, it is not entirely clear how the contractual arrangements between us and the VIEs will be treated for purposes of the PFIC rules, and we may be or become a PFIC if the VIEs are not treated as owned by us for these purposes. In addition, the extent to which our goodwill should be characterized as an active asset is not entirely clear. Furthermore, our PFIC status for any taxable year is an annual determination that could be made only after the end of that year. For these reasons, and because the composition of our income and assets may change over time, there can be no assurance that we were not, or will not be, a PFIC for any taxable year. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. taxpayer holds ADSs or Class A ordinary shares, the U.S. taxpayer generally will be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, including increased tax liability on disposition gains and “excess distributions” and additional reporting requirements. See “Item 10. Additional Information—10.E. Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

4.A. History and Development of the Company

Our Major Business Milestones

In 2007, we launched our flagship Youdao Dictionary, China’s leading language app.

In 2012, NetEase launched NetEase Cloud Classroom, a platform offering online courses mainly targeting adults in China, which was acquired by us in May 2019.

In 2014, we strategically expanded offerings to include online courses by launching Youdao Classroom, which was rebranded as Youdao Premium Courses in 2016. In the same year, NetEase launched China University MOOC, a platform offering online courses primarily targeting college students and adults in China, which was acquired by us in May 2019.

In 2021, we officially launched our education digitalization solutions business and introduced the second generation of Youdao Smart Learning Terminal, a device that automates paper-based homework processing and provides learning diagnosis through the AI technology at schools.

We ceased to offer the Academic AST Business in the fourth quarter of 2021, in order to fully comply with applicable PRC regulatory requirements adopted by the PRC government in the second half of 2021.

In 2022, we introduced a number of new intelligent learning devices, primarily including Youdao Dictionary Pen X5, which is equipped with the first dictionary pen smart operation system.

In 2023, leveraging the rapid advancement of generative AI technologies, we developed our own LLM, Confucius, and unveiled a suite of AI-driven tools underpinned by Confucius’s capabilities since 2023, including Hi Echo, an AI-driven digital human language coach providing personalized oral English speaking practice and real-time feedback, enabled through Confucius, and Mr. P AI Tutor, a conversation-based tool designed to extend the application of Confucius to real-time and multi-modality learning features across major subjects for students.

In 2024, we leveraged our powerful LLM capabilities to upgrade Youdao Lingshi with more personalized features and introduced a number of new intelligent learning products, such as Youdao Dictionary Pen X7, Youdao Dictionary Pen X7 Pro and Youdao Dictionary Pen A7 Pro.

In 2025, we advanced our AI-native strategy by expanding our Confucius LLM portfolio and embedding it across our learning services, online marketing services and smart devices, launching new AI offerings such as Scholar AI, the AI Ad Placement Optimizer and Youdao iMagicBox, and expanding our smart device portfolio with the launch of brand-new tutoring pens Youdao SpaceOne and Youdao Space X.

Our Corporate History

We commenced our operations in March 2006 through Youdao Information. In September 2007, Youdao Computer was incorporated in the PRC. We conducted our business through both Youdao Information and Youdao Computer and they were then controlled by NetEase.

In 2014, we strategically shifted our focus to the intelligent learning industry. Since then, we have successfully developed a variety of technology-driven smart devices and learning services.

In November 2014, Youdao, Inc., our current ultimate holding company, was incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

In July 2016, Youdao HK was incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong. Youdao HK currently operates our overseas online marketing and AI-driven subscription businesses.

Between December 2016 and November 2017, through a number of transactions, we acquired the entire interests in Youdao Information and, through certain contractual arrangements, the control of Youdao Computer.

In April 2018, we issued a total of 6,814,815 Series A preferred shares to certain investors for an aggregate consideration of US$70.0 million.

Due to the restrictions imposed by PRC laws and regulations on foreign ownership of companies engaged in value-added telecommunication services and certain other businesses, certain of our PRC subsidiaries entered into a series of contractual arrangements, as amended and restated, with the VIEs, as well as their respective shareholders, through such contractual arrangements we are regarded as the primary beneficiary of each of the VIEs for accounting purposes. We treat them as VIEs under U.S. GAAP and have consolidated the financial results of these entities in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under the U.S. GAAP are satisfied. We refer to Youdao Information and Youdao Hangzhou as our wholly foreign owned entities, or WFOEs, and to Youdao Computer, Linjiedian Education and Youdao Guangzhou Computer as the VIEs, in this annual report. For more details and risks related to the VIE structure, please see “—4.C. Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs and the VIEs’ Respective Shareholders” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure.”

In October 2019, we completed an initial public offering in which we offered and sold an aggregate of 5,600,000 Class A ordinary shares in the form of ADSs. Concurrently with the initial public offering, we issued and sold 7,352,941 Class A ordinary shares to Orbis in private placements. Upon the initial public offering, all of our issued and outstanding Series A preferred shares were automatically converted into Class A ordinary shares on a one-for-one basis. On October 25, 2019, the ADSs began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “DAO.”

In February 2021, we raised approximately US$231.6 million of net proceeds through a follow-on offering of ADSs.

Our corporate headquarters is located at No. 399 Wangshang Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou 310051, People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number at this address is + 86 0571-8985-2163. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at Maples Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Cogency Global Inc. located at 122 East 42nd Street, 18th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10168. Our principal website is www.youdao.com. The information contained on our website is not a part of this annual report.

The SEC maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Selected Condensed Consolidating Schedule

The following tables present the selected condensed consolidating schedule of financial information for Youdao, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries that are the primary beneficiaries of the VIEs, namely, Youdao Information and Youdao Hangzhou, its other subsidiaries, the VIEs and their subsidiaries that we consolidate for the periods presented.