BKV0126_FinalReport(NYMEX)-EDGAR

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV CORPORATION

Estimated

Future Reserves and Income

Attributable to Certain

Leasehold and Royalty Interests

SEC Parameters

(NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

As of

December 31, 2025

/s/ Stephen E. Gardner

Stephen E. Gardner, P.E.

Colorado License No. 44720

Managing Senior Vice President

[SEAL]

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

TBPELS Firm Registration No. F-1580

1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 4600HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5294TEL (713) 651-9191

SUITE 2800, 350 7TH AVENUE, S.W.CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3N9TEL (403) 262-2799

TBPELS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580

555 17TH STREET SUITE 985DENVER, COLORADO 80202TELEPHONE (303) 339-8110

January 27, 2026

BKV Corporation

1200 17th Street, Suite 1850

Denver, CO 80202

Ladies and Gentlemen:

At your request, Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (Ryder Scott) has prepared an estimate of the

proved reserves, future production, and income attributable to certain leasehold and royalty interests of

BKV Corporation (BKV) as of December 31, 2025. The subject properties are located in the states of

Pennsylvania and Texas. The reserves and income data were estimated based on the definitions and

disclosure guidelines of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained in

Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released

January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register (SEC regulations); except that they were based on varying

price and constant cost assumptions provided by BKV. This pricing scenario is considered an

“Alternate Pricing Scheme” in accordance with the above referenced Final Rule, Section II, Item B,

Paragraph 3. Such forecasts were based on projected escalations or other forward-looking changes to

current prices as noted. Our third-party study, completed on January 27, 2026 and presented herein

was prepared for public disclosure by BKV, as an alternate pricing scheme, in filings made with the

SEC in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth by the SEC regulations. The income data

for the reserves volumes were estimated using NYMEX Futures Strip prices as of December 31, 2025.

The properties evaluated by Ryder Scott account for 100 percent of BKV’s total net proved liquid

hydrocarbon and gas reserves as of December 31, 2025.

The estimated reserves and future net income amounts presented in this report, as of

December 31, 2025 are related to hydrocarbon prices. The hydrocarbon prices used in the preparation

of this report are based on varying NYMEX Futures Strip pricing assumptions provided by BKV and are

explained in more detail later in this report. As a result of both economic and political forces, there is

substantial uncertainty regarding the forecasting of future hydrocarbon prices. Consequently, actual

future prices may vary considerably from the prices assumed in this report. The reserves volumes and

the income attributable thereto have a direct relationship to the hydrocarbon prices actually received;

therefore, volumes of reserves actually recovered and the amounts of income actually received may

differ significantly from the estimated quantities presented in this report. The results of this study are

summarized as follows.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

SEC PARAMETERS (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

Estimated Net Reserves and Income Data

Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests of

BKV Corporation

As of December 31, 2025


	Proved
	Developed			Total
	Producing	Non-Producing	Undeveloped	Proved
Net Reserves
Oil/Condensate – Mbbl	1,597	163	2,086	3,846
Plant Products – Mbbl	163,078	20,426	74,843	258,347
Gas – MMcf	2,972,440	184,347	1,243,920	4,400,707
MMCFE	3,960,490	307,881	1,705,494	5,973,865

Income Data ($M)
Future Gross Revenue	$11,277,772	$862,978	$4,922,070	$17,062,821
Deductions	6,679,619	494,976	2,649,250	9,823,845
Future Net Income (FNI)	$ 4,598,153	$368,002	$2,272,821	$ 7,238,975

Discounted FNI @ 10%	$ 2,364,595	$117,669	$ 599,957	$ 3,082,221

Values may not sum to total due to rounding

PERCENTAGE OF PROVED RESERVES PER HYDROCARBON PHASE (gas equivalent basis)


OPERATED	December 31, 2025
Operating Region	Estimated Total Proved Reserves	% Natural Gas	% Natural Gas Liquids	% Oil	Average Annual PDP Decline
Operating Region	(MMCFE)	% Natural Gas	% Natural Gas Liquids	% Oil	Five Year	Ten Year
Barnett	5,309,381	70.7%	28.9%	0.4%	8%	7%
NEPA	539,130	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	11%	9%
Total	5,848,511	73.4%	26.2%	0.4%	9%	7%

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026


NON-OPERATED	December 31, 2025
Operating Region	Estimated Total Proved Reserves	% Natural Gas	% Natural Gas Liquids	% Oil	Average Annual PDP Decline
Operating Region	(MMCFE)	% Natural Gas	% Natural Gas Liquids	% Oil	Five Year	Ten Year
Barnett	56,277	69.1%	30.5%	0.4%	9%	8%
NEPA	69,077	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	13%	11%
Total	125,354	86.1%	13.7%	0.2%	9%	8%

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026


TOTAL COMPANY	December 31, 2025
Operating Region	Estimated Total Proved Reserves	% Natural Gas	% Natural Gas Liquids	% Oil	Average Annual PDP Decline
Operating Region	(MMCFE)	% Natural Gas	% Natural Gas Liquids	% Oil	Five Year	Ten Year
Barnett	5,365,658	70.7%	28.9%	0.4%	8%	7%
NEPA	608,207	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	11%	9%
Total	5,973,865	73.7%	25.9%	0.4%	9%	7%

Liquid hydrocarbons are expressed in standard 42 U.S. gallon barrels and shown herein as

thousands of barrels (Mbbl). All gas volumes are expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMcf) at the

official temperature and pressure bases of the areas in which the gas volumes are located. All gas

reserves volumes are reported on an “as sold” basis. In this report, the revenues, deductions, and

income data are expressed as thousands of U.S. dollars ($M). The net reserves volumes are also

shown herein on an equivalent unit basis wherein hydrocarbon liquid is converted to natural gas

equivalent using a factor of 1 barrel of liquid per 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas equivalent. MMCFE

means million cubic feet of natural gas equivalent.

The estimates of the reserves, future production, and income attributable to properties in this

report were prepared using the economic software package ARIESTM Petroleum Economics and

Reserves Software, a copyrighted program of Halliburton. The program was used at the request of

BKV. Ryder Scott has found this program to be generally acceptable, but notes that certain summaries

and calculations may vary due to rounding and may not exactly match the sum of the properties being

summarized. Furthermore, one-line economic summaries may vary slightly from the more detailed

cash flow projections of the same properties, also due to rounding. The rounding differences are not

material.

The future gross revenue is after the deduction of production taxes. The deductions incorporate

the normal direct costs of operating the wells, ad valorem taxes (including the Pennsylvania Impact

Fee), development costs, and certain abandonment costs net of salvage. The future net income is

before the deduction of state and federal income taxes and general administrative overhead and has

not been adjusted for outstanding loans that may exist nor does it include any adjustment for cash on

hand or undistributed income.

Gas reserves account for approximately 76 percent and liquid hydrocarbon reserves account for

the remaining 24 percent of total future gross revenue from proved reserves.

The discounted future net income shown above was calculated using a discount rate of 10

percent per annum compounded monthly. Future net income was discounted at four other discount

rates which were also compounded monthly. These results are shown in summary form as follows.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026


		Discounted Future Net Income ($M)
		As of December 31, 2025
Discount Rate Percent		Total Proved

9		$3,284,033
12		$2,740,433
15		$2,342,635
20		$1,876,948

The results shown above are presented for your information and should not be construed as our

estimate of fair market value.

Reserves Included in This Report

The proved reserves included herein conform to the definitions as set forth in the Securities and

Exchange Commission’s Regulations Part 210.4-10(a), except that they are based on price parameters

which allow for future changes in current economic conditions as discussed in other sections of this

report, whereas the definition approved by the SEC assumes constant price parameters using the

average prices during the 12-month period prior to the “as of date” of this report, determined as the

unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month

within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements. An abridged version of the

SEC reserves definitions from 210.4-10(a) entitled “PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS” is

included as an attachment to this report.

The various reserves status categories are defined in the attachment entitled “PETROLEUM

RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES” in this report. The proved developed non-

producing reserves included herein consist of the shut-in and behind pipe status categories.

No attempt was made to quantify or otherwise account for any accumulated gas production

imbalances that may exist. The proved gas volumes presented herein do not include volumes of gas

consumed in operations as reserves.

Reserves are “estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated

to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known

accumulations.” All reserves estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the likelihood

that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the estimated quantities

determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends primarily on the amount of

reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of

these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two

principal categories, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered

than proved reserves and may be further sub-categorized as probable and possible reserves to denote

progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. At BKV’s request, this report addresses only

the proved reserves attributable to the properties evaluated herein.

Proved oil and gas reserves are “those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of

geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically

producible from a given date forward.” The proved reserves included herein were estimated using

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

deterministic methods. The SEC has defined reasonable certainty for proved reserves, when based on

deterministic methods, as a “high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered.”

Proved reserves estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering

data become available or as economic conditions change. For proved reserves, the SEC states that

“as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical),

engineering, and economic data are made to the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time,

reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.”

Moreover, estimates of proved reserves may be revised as a result of future operations, effects of

regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks. Therefore, the proved reserves

included in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities, and if

recovered, the revenues therefrom, and the actual costs related thereto, could be more or less than the

estimated amounts.

It should be noted that the estimated quantities of reserves presented in this report, which were

based on NYMEX Futures Strip prices and constant current cost assumptions, may differ from the

quantities of reserves which would be estimated using the price parameters prescribed by the SEC

guidelines.

BKV’s operations may be subject to various levels of governmental controls and regulations.

These controls and regulations may include, but may not be limited to, matters relating to land tenure

and leasing, the legal rights to produce hydrocarbons, drilling and production practices, environmental

protection, marketing and pricing policies, royalties, various taxes and levies including income tax and

are subject to change from time to time. Such changes in governmental regulations and policies may

cause volumes of reserves actually recovered and amounts of income actually received to differ

significantly from the estimated quantities.

The estimates of proved reserves presented herein were based upon a detailed study of the

properties in which BKV owns an interest; however, we have not made any field examination of the

properties. No consideration was given in this report to potential environmental liabilities that may exist

nor were any costs included for potential liabilities to restore and clean up damages, if any, caused by

past operating practices.

Estimates of Reserves

The estimation of reserves involves two distinct determinations. The first determination results

in the estimation of the quantities of recoverable oil and gas and the second determination results in the

estimation of the uncertainty associated with those estimated quantities in accordance with the

definitions set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). The

process of estimating the quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves relies on the use of certain

generally accepted analytical procedures. These analytical procedures fall into three broad categories

or methods: (1) performance-based methods, (2) volumetric-based methods and (3) analogy. These

methods may be used individually or in combination by the reserves evaluator in the process of

estimating the quantities of reserves. Reserves evaluators must select the method or combination of

methods which in their professional judgment is most appropriate given the nature and amount of

reliable geoscience and engineering data available at the time of the estimate, the established or

anticipated performance characteristics of the reservoir being evaluated, and the stage of development

or producing maturity of the property.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

In many cases, the analysis of the available geoscience and engineering data and the

subsequent interpretation of this data may indicate a range of possible outcomes in an estimate,

irrespective of the method selected by the evaluator. When a range in the quantity of reserves is

identified, the evaluator must determine the uncertainty associated with the incremental quantities of

the reserves. If the reserves quantities are estimated using the deterministic incremental approach, the

uncertainty for each discrete incremental quantity of the reserves is addressed by the reserves category

assigned by the evaluator. Therefore, it is the categorization of reserves quantities as proved, probable

and/or possible that addresses the inherent uncertainty in the estimated quantities reported. For

proved reserves, uncertainty is defined by the SEC as reasonable certainty wherein the “quantities

actually recovered are much more likely to be achieved than not.” The SEC states that “probable

reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but

which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.” The SEC states that

“possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable

reserves and the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding

proved plus probable plus possible reserves.” All quantities of reserves within the same reserves

category must meet the SEC definitions as noted above.

Estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserves categories may be revised in the

future as additional geoscience or engineering data become available. Furthermore, estimates of

reserves quantities and their associated reserves categories may also be revised due to other factors

such as changes in economic conditions, results of future operations, effects of regulation by

governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks as previously noted herein.

The reserves for the properties included herein were estimated by performance methods or

analogy. In general, the proved reserves attributable to producing wells and/or reservoirs were

estimated by decline curve analysis, a performance method which utilized extrapolations of historical

production and pressure data ending between August and October 2025, depending on the availability

of data for a given case and in those cases where such data were considered to be definitive. For

certain early-life cases, where there were inadequate historical performance data to establish a

definitive trend and where the use of production performance data as a sole basis for the estimates was

considered to be inappropriate, producing reserves were guided by analogy to older, more established

wells. The data utilized in our analysis were furnished to Ryder Scott by BKV or obtained from public

data sources and were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof.

The reserves for the properties included herein attributable to the non-producing and the

undeveloped status categories were estimated by analogy. The data utilized from the analogues were

furnished to Ryder Scott by BKV or obtained from public data sources and were considered sufficient

for the purpose thereof.

To estimate economically producible proved oil and gas reserves and related future net cash

flows, we consider many factors and assumptions including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir

parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data which cannot be measured

directly, economic criteria based on current costs and the pricing assumptions provided to us, and

forecasts of future production rates. Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved

reserves must be anticipated to be economically producible from a given date forward based on

existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a

reservoir is to be determined; which for this report, as stated previously, are based on pricing and cost

parameters provided by and requested to be used by BKV.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

BKV has informed us that they have furnished us all of the material accounts, records,

geological and engineering data, and reports and other data required for this investigation. In preparing

our forecast of future proved production and income, we have relied upon data furnished by BKV with

respect to property interests owned, production and well tests from examined wells, normal direct costs

of operating the wells or leases, other costs such as transportation and/or processing fees, ad valorem

taxes (including the Pennsylvania Impact Fee), production taxes, development costs, development

plans, abandonment costs after salvage, product price assumptions, adjustments or differentials to

product prices, geological structure and isochore maps, and base maps. Ryder Scott reviewed such

factual data for its reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the

data furnished by BKV. We consider the factual data used in this report appropriate and sufficient for

the purpose of preparing the estimates of reserves and future net revenues herein.

In summary, we consider the assumptions, data, methods and analytical procedures used in this

report appropriate for the purpose hereof, and we have used all such methods and procedures that we

consider necessary and appropriate to prepare the estimates of reserves herein. The proved reserves

included herein were determined in conformance with the United States Securities and Exchange

Commission (SEC) Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule, including all references to

Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, referred to herein collectively as the “SEC Regulations.” In our

opinion, the proved reserves presented in this report comply with the definitions, guidelines and

disclosure requirements as required by the SEC regulations and are included as a price sensitivity case

as allowed by SEC regulations.

Future Production Rates

For the producing wells included herein, our forecasts of future production rates and decline

trends are based on the historical performance data of each well. If no production decline trend has

been established, future decline trends were based on analogy to older, more established wells.

The initial performance of analogous wells was used to estimate the anticipated initial

production rates for those wells or locations that are not currently producing. For reserves not yet on

production, sales were estimated to commence at an anticipated date furnished by BKV. Wells or

locations that are not currently producing may start producing earlier or later than anticipated in our

estimates due to unforeseen factors causing a change in the timing to initiate production. Such factors

may include delays due to weather, the availability of rigs, the sequence of drilling, well completions,

and/or constraints set by regulatory bodies.

The future production rates from wells currently on production or wells or locations that are not

currently producing may be more or less than estimated because of changes including, but not limited

to, reservoir performance, operating conditions related to surface facilities, compression and artificial

lift, pipeline capacity and/or operating conditions, producing market demand and/or allowables or other

constraints set by regulatory bodies.

Hydrocarbon Prices

The forecast hydrocarbon price parameters used in this report, based on NYMEX Futures Strip

prices, were specified by BKV and are noted below. Estimates of future price parameters have been

revised in the past because of changes in governmental policies, changes in hydrocarbon supply and

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

demand, and variations in general economic conditions. The price parameters used in this report may

be revised in the future for similar reasons. Gas prices may be subject to seasonal variations and other

factors and may lead to periodic curtailments by both buyers and sellers.

At BKV’s request, we furnished the NYMEX Futures Strip prices in effect as of December 31,

2025, that were used as the average benchmark prices in this report.

The product prices that were actually used to determine the future gross revenue for each

property reflect adjustments to the benchmark prices for gravity, quality, local conditions, certain gas

firm transportation fees, certain NGL fractionation and transportation fees, and/or distance from market,

referred to herein as “differentials.” The differentials used in the preparation of this report were

furnished to us by BKV. The differentials were reviewed by us for their reasonableness using

information furnished by BKV for this purpose.

In addition, the table below summarizes the annual net volume weighted benchmark prices

adjusted for differentials and referred to herein as the “average realized prices.” The average realized

prices shown in the table below were determined from the annual total future gross revenue before

production taxes and the total net reserves, by reserves category for these properties.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026


Geographic Area	AVERAGE BENCHMARK PRICES		AVERAGE REALIZED PRICES
United States	WTI - Cushing	Henry Hub	Oil/Cond	Plant Products	Gas
Year	$/Bbl	$/MMBtu	$/Bbl	$/Bbl	$/Mcf

2026	$57.05	$3.63	$49.91	$14.45	$3.05
2027	$57.31	$3.88	$50.10	$14.52	$3.30
2028	$58.57	$3.71	$51.26	$14.95	$3.13
2029	$59.86	$3.61	$52.56	$15.42	$3.03
2030	$60.77	$3.61	$53.84	$15.77	$3.04
2031	$61.30	$3.48	$54.05	$15.79	$3.04
2032	$61.48	$3.33	$53.97	$15.78	$3.04
2033	$61.43	$3.23	$53.94	$15.78	$3.04
2034	$61.11	$3.34	$53.93	$15.78	$3.04
2035	$60.53	$3.42	$53.93	$15.77	$3.04
2036	$59.89	$3.51	$53.92	$15.77	$3.04
2037	$59.89	$3.42	$53.92	$15.77	$3.04
2038+	$59.89	$3.36	$53.92	$15.77	$3.04
Total Future Average Prices			$53.20	$15.54	$3.06

The effects of derivative instruments designated as price hedges of oil and gas quantities are

not reflected in our individual property evaluations.

Costs

Operating costs for the leases and wells in this report were furnished by BKV and are based on

the operating expense reports of BKV and include only those costs directly applicable to the leases or

wells. Certain gas gathering and transportation costs were included as operating expenses. The

operating costs furnished by BKV were reviewed by us for their reasonableness using information

furnished by BKV for this purpose. No deduction was made for loan repayments, interest expenses, or

exploration and development prepayments that were not charged directly to the leases or wells.

Development costs were furnished to us by BKV and are based on authorizations for

expenditure for the proposed work or actual costs for similar projects. The development costs furnished

to us were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness using information

furnished by BKV for this purpose.

The estimated net cost of abandonment after salvage was included for properties where certain

abandonment costs net of salvage were provided by BKV, and which they requested be included in our

report. The estimates of the net abandonment costs furnished by BKV were accepted without

independent verification. We have made no inspections to determine if any other abandonment,

decommissioning, and /or restoration costs may be necessary, in addition to the costs provided by BKV

and included herein.

The proved developed non-producing and undeveloped reserves in this report have been

incorporated herein in accordance with BKV’s plans to develop these reserves as of December 31,

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

2025. The implementation of BKV’s development plans as presented to us and incorporated herein is

subject to the approval process adopted by BKV’s management. As the result of our inquiries during

the course of preparing this report, BKV has informed us that the development activities included herein

have been subjected to and received the internal approvals required by BKV’s management at the

appropriate local, regional and/or corporate level. In addition to the internal approvals as noted, certain

development activities may still be subject to specific partner AFE processes, Joint Operating

Agreement (JOA) requirements or other administrative approvals external to BKV. BKV has provided

written documentation supporting their commitment to proceed with the development activities as

presented to us. Additionally, BKV has informed us that they are not aware of any legal, regulatory, or

political obstacles that would significantly alter their plans.

Current costs used by BKV were held constant throughout the life of the properties.

Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification

Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing

petroleum consulting services throughout the world since 1937. Ryder Scott is employee-owned and

maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada. We have

approximately eighty engineers and geoscientists on our permanent staff. By virtue of the size of our

firm and the large number of clients for which we provide services, no single client or job represents a

material portion of our annual revenue. We do not serve as officers or directors of any privately-owned

or publicly-traded oil and gas company and are separate and independent from the operating and

investment decision-making process of our clients. This allows us to bring the highest level of

independence and objectivity to each engagement for our services.

Ryder Scott actively participates in industry-related professional societies and organizes an

annual public forum focused on the subject of reserves evaluations and SEC regulations. Many of our

staff have authored or co-authored technical papers on the subject of reserves related topics. We

encourage our staff to maintain and enhance their professional skills by actively participating in ongoing

continuing education.

Prior to becoming an officer of the Company, Ryder Scott requires that staff engineers and

geoscientists receive professional accreditation in the form of a registered or certified professional

engineer’s license or a registered or certified professional geoscientist’s license, or the equivalent

thereof, from an appropriate governmental authority or a recognized self-regulating professional

organization. Regulating agencies require that, in order to maintain active status, a certain amount of

continuing education hours be completed annually, including an hour of ethics training. Ryder Scott

fully supports this technical and ethics training with our internal requirement mentioned above.

We are independent petroleum engineers with respect to BKV. Neither we nor any of our

employees have any financial interest in the subject properties and neither the employment to do this

work nor the compensation is contingent on our estimates of reserves for the properties which were

reviewed.

The results of this study, presented herein, are based on technical analyses conducted by

teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott. The professional qualifications of the

undersigned, the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing the evaluation of the reserves

information discussed in this report, are included as an attachment to this letter.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BKV Corporation – SEC Parameters (NYMEX Alternate Pricing Scheme)

January 27, 2026

Terms of Usage

The results of our third party study, presented in report form herein, were prepared in

accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations and intended for public

disclosure as an exhibit in filings made with the SEC by BKV. This report was based on forward looking

price forecasts and may be filed as an additional pricing scenario to the SEC constant prices and costs

case according to SEC guidelines.

BKV makes periodic filings on Form 10-K with the SEC under the 1934 Exchange Act.

Furthermore, BKV has certain registration statements filed with the SEC under the 1933 Securities Act

into which any subsequently filed Form 10-K is incorporated by reference. We have consented to the

incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 of BKV, of the references to our

name, as well as to the references to our third-party report for BKV, which appears in the December 31,

2025 annual report on Form 10-K of BKV. Our written consent for such use is included as a separate

exhibit to the filings made with the SEC by BKV.

We have provided BKV with a digital version of the original signed copy of this report letter. In

the event there are any differences between the digital version included in filings made by BKV and the

original signed report letter, the original signed report letter shall control and supersede the digital

version.

The data and work papers used in the preparation of this report are available for examination by

authorized parties in our offices. Please contact us if we can be of further service.

Very truly yours,

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

TBPELS Firm Registration No. F-1580

/s/ Stephen E. Gardner

Stephen E. Gardner, P.E.

Colorado License No. 44720[SEAL]

Managing Senior Vice President

SEG (DRO)/pl

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

Professional Qualifications of Primary Technical Person

The conclusions presented in this report are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of

geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott Company, L.P. Mr. Stephen E. Gardner is the primary

technical person responsible for the estimate of the reserves, future production and income.

Mr. Gardner, an employee of Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (Ryder Scott) since 2006, is a Managing

Senior Vice President responsible for ongoing reservoir evaluation studies worldwide, as well as for

coordinating and supervising the evaluations of staff and consulting engineers of the company. Mr.

Gardner is also a member of Ryder Scott’s Board of Directors. Before joining Ryder Scott, Mr. Gardner

served in a number of engineering positions with Exxon Mobil Corporation. For more information

regarding Mr. Gardner’s geographic and job specific experience, please refer to the Ryder Scott

Company website at https://ryderscott.com/employees/denver-employees.

Mr. Gardner earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young

University in 2001 (summa cum laude). He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the States of

Colorado and Texas. Mr. Gardner is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and a

former director of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (SPEE). He currently serves as an

officer for SPEE at the international level.

In addition to gaining experience and competency through prior work experience, the Texas Board of

Professional Engineers requires a minimum of 15 hours of continuing education annually, including at

least one hour in the area of professional ethics, which Mr. Gardner fulfills. As part of his 2025

continuing education hours, Mr. Gardner attended multiple technical conferences, including the SPEE

Annual Meeting and the annual Ryder Scott Reserves Conference, which covered a variety of reserves

topics including analysis techniques for unconventional reservoirs, geothermal energy, reserves

definitions and guidelines, SEC comment letter trends, ethics, and others. Mr. Gardner attended the

2025 Geothermal Rising Conference, where he presented a technical paper on geothermal resource

classifications. In addition, Mr. Gardner participated in various local technical seminars and other

internal company training courses throughout the year covering topics such as reserves evaluation

methods and evaluation software, ethics, M&A trends, regulatory issues, enhanced geothermal

systems, and more.

Based on his educational background, professional training and approximately 20 years of practical

experience in the estimation and evaluation of petroleum reserves, Mr. Gardner has attained the

professional qualifications as a Reserves Estimator set forth in Article III of the “Standards Pertaining to

the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information” promulgated by the Society of

Petroleum Engineers as of June 2019.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS

As Adapted From:

RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)

PREAMBLE

On January 14, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published

the “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule” in the Federal Register of National Archives

and Records Administration (NARA). The “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule”

includes revisions and additions to the definition section in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X, revisions and

additions to the oil and gas reporting requirements in Regulation S-K, and amends and codifies Industry

Guide 2 in Regulation S-K. The “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule”, including all

references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, shall be referred to herein collectively as the “SEC

regulations”. The SEC regulations take effect for all filings made with the United States Securities and

Exchange Commission as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010. Reference should be made

to the full text under Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10(a) for

the complete definitions (direct passages excerpted in part or wholly from the aforementioned SEC

document are denoted in italics herein).

Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated

to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known

accumulations. All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the likelihood

that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the estimated quantities

determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of

reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of

these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two

principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered

than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote

progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. Under the SEC regulations as of

December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010, a company may optionally disclose estimated quantities

of probable or possible oil and gas reserves in documents publicly filed with the SEC. The SEC

regulations continue to prohibit disclosure of estimates of oil and gas resources other than reserves and

any estimated values of such resources in any document publicly filed with the SEC unless such

information is required to be disclosed in the document by foreign or state law as noted in §229.1202

Instruction to Item 1202.

Reserves estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering data

become available or as economic conditions change.

Reserves may be attributed to either natural energy or improved recovery methods. Improved

recovery methods include all methods for supplementing natural energy or altering natural forces in the

reservoir to increase ultimate recovery. Examples of such methods are pressure maintenance, natural

gas cycling, waterflooding, thermal methods, chemical flooding, and the use of miscible and immiscible

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS

Page 2

displacement fluids. Other improved recovery methods may be developed in the future as petroleum

technology continues to evolve.

Reserves may be attributed to either conventional or unconventional petroleum accumulations.

Petroleum accumulations are considered as either conventional or unconventional based on the nature

of their in-place characteristics, extraction method applied, or degree of processing prior to sale.

Examples of unconventional petroleum accumulations include coalbed or coalseam methane (CBM/

CSM), basin-centered gas, shale gas, gas hydrates, natural bitumen and oil shale deposits. These

unconventional accumulations may require specialized extraction technology and/or significant

processing prior to sale.

Reserves do not include quantities of petroleum being held in inventory.

Because of the differences in uncertainty, caution should be exercised when aggregating

quantities of petroleum from different reserves categories.

RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(26) defines reserves as

follows:

Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances

anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to

known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that

there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of

delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to

implement the project.

Note to paragraph (a)(26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major,

potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically

producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known

accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or

negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources (i.e., potentially recoverable

resources from undiscovered accumulations).

PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(22) defines proved oil and

gas reserves as follows:

Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which,

by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be

economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing

economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which

contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably

certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The

project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain

that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS

Page 3

(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

(A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and

(B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be

judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the

basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the

lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience,

engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with

reasonable certainty.

(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO)

elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be

assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or

performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery

techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification

when:

(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no

more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in

the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology

establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or

program was based; and

(B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities,

including governmental entities.

(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a

reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period

prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted

arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless

prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future

conditions.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

PETROLEUM RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES

As Adapted From:

RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)

and

2018 PETROLEUM RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SPE-PRMS)