UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

Or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission file number: 000-41218

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standard provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of December 29, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $6,696,894 based upon the last sales price of the common stock as of such date. Solely for purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock held by executive officers, directors and beneficial holders of 10% or more of the outstanding common stock of the registrant as of such date have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.

As of November 30, 2025, the registrant had 162,580,506 shares of its common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Unless we state otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms the “Company” “Zapata,” “Zapata Quantum,” “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to Zapata Quantum, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this report may be referred to without the ® and ™ symbols, but such references should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert their rights thereto.

Unless otherwise noted, the description of our business and the discussion of related risk factors reflects Zapata Quantum’s operations and strategic direction as of 2025. The Company underwent significant changes after December 31, 2024, including a restructuring, rebranding, and renewed focus on quantum computing application development.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expectations for prospective future growth, operating results and financial condition, potential future trends and developments within our industry and the U.S. and global economies generally, plans and expectations for our future business plan and capital raising efforts, expectations and plans with respect to our products and services including the potential market for, timing, features, and demand for such products and services, and liquidity and sources of capital. Forward-looking statements are prefaced by words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “intend,” “seem,” “potential,” “appear,” “continue,” “future,” believe,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” and similar words. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements.

Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, the possibility that estimates, projections and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based prove to be incorrect, our ability to raise the necessary capital to re-establish material operations and generate revenue and the terms and timing of any related transactions, central bank interest rates and future interest rate changes, the risks arising from the impact of inflation, tariffs, the deterioration of the labor market of the United States, a recession which may result on the Company’s business, prospective customers, and on the national and global economy, our ability to attract homeowners to our products and services, the potential for regulatory changes impacting quantum computing, artificial intelligence, data privacy and other areas that impact the Company’s business, and the ability of us and third parties on which we depend to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the risk that software and technology infrastructure on which we depend fail to perform as designed or intended, and the risks and uncertainties disclosed under Item 1A – Risk Factors contained in this Report. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this presentation speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

ii

Frequently Used Terms

In this document:

“AI” means artificial intelligence”

“Business Combination Agreement” means the Business Combination Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2023, by and among the Company, Merger Sub and Legacy Zapata, as may be amended from time to time.

“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

“Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share.

“DGCL” means the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

“Exchange Act” means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

“IP” means intellectual property.

“Legacy Zapata” means Zapata Computing, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

“Merger” means the merger of Merger Sub with and into Legacy Zapata with Legacy Zapata that occurred on March 28, 2024 with Legacy Zapata surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company as contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement.

“Merger Sub” means Tigre Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned direct subsidiary of the Company prior to the closing of the Merger.

“Nasdaq” means the Nasdaq Stock Market.

“Preferred Stock” means the preferred stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share.

“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” means the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

“SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933.

“Senior Secured Notes” means the senior secured promissory notes issued by Zapata and its subsidiary, the obligations of which are secured by the assets thereof.

iii

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

Zapata Quantum is a leading pure-play hardware-agnostic quantum software company. Following a strategic realignment in 2025, the Company will deliver solutions to efficiently deploy and accelerate the development of quantum and hybrid quantum-classical computing applications. Founded in 2017 by researchers from a Harvard University Quantum Computing Lab, Zapata has built one of the industry’s most robust intellectual property portfolios in quantum and hybrid quantum-classical computing and algorithmic methods, with over 60 patents granted and pending developed over eight years.

Zapata’s software platform for quantum computing applications is based on our patented technology and supports a wide range of use cases in cryptography, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, materials discovery and defense. The Company is the only organization to have participated across all technical areas of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (“DARPA”)’s Quantum Benchmarking program and has worked with Fortune 500 enterprises and government agencies to unlock the potential of quantum computing.

On March 28, 2024, we consummated the business combination contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, dated September 6, 2023, by and among the Company, Merger Sub and Legacy Zapata. Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Merger took place pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into Legacy Zapata resulting in Legacy Zapata becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

In late 2024 the Company voluntarily elected to temporarily suspend its operations due to its limited capital resources and inability to access adequate liquidity to continue to fund its operations and meet its outstanding debt obligations. In June 2025, the Company commenced debt restructuring and capital raising transactions and the reinstatement of operations by (1) entering into exchange agreements with unsecured creditors pursuant to which such creditors agreed to exchange outstanding obligations payable to them for common stock and certain rights related thereto, and (2) the Company sold convertible notes and warrants for gross proceeds of $3 million. The Company has since been continuing efforts to negotiate and restructure outstanding obligations and raise capital. In the furtherance of recommencing operations, the Company has also entered into advisory agreements with third parties and agreed to compensate such parties in the form of equity and/or cash compensation. See Note 20, Subsequent Events, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report.

Following a period of broader AI exploration, the Company undertook, in 2024 and 2025, a strategic realignment to refocus on its core quantum mission: developing the software and tooling layer that enables enterprises, governments, and researchers to harness quantum computing for economically meaningful outcomes.

Zapata’s hardware-agnostic approach and proprietary technology address the “software bottleneck” that limits quantum adoption. The Company’s products - Orquestra, Bench-Q, Quantum Graph, and Quantum Pilot - provide the infrastructure and workflow tools that connect problem discovery, algorithm design, and hardware execution. These tools are supported by professional services, partnerships, and licensing programs that collectively form the Company’s business model.

The Company’s business plans and operations described herein, and our ability to execute and continue with such efforts, will depend on our ability to raise capital needed to repay vendors and creditors, rehire various personnel and fund our working capital and growth needs. Further, our capital raising efforts and business and operation generally are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, as described under “Item 1A – Risk Factors.”

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Quantum computing exploits the principles of quantum mechanics - superposition, entanglement, and interference - to process information in fundamentally new ways. Whereas classical computers operate on bits that are either 0 or 1, quantum computers use quantum bits, or “qubits” that can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This enables exponential scaling of computational possibilities and the potential to solve certain classes of problems - such as molecular simulation, combinatorial optimization, and cryptographic analysis - that are intractable on classical machines.

The field of quantum computing is advancing rapidly, supported by significant broad-based investment. Global governments have announced multibillion-dollar quantum initiatives, venture and public-market investment have accelerated considerably, and major cloud computing providers now offer access to quantum processors. A 2024 Boston Consulting Group analysis estimates that quantum technologies will create $450 billion to $850 billion of economic value globally, sustaining a $90 billion to $170 billion market for hardware and software providers by 2040.

Phases of Quantum Computing Technology Development

The first phase of quantum computing has been the arrival of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, characterized by limited qubit counts and the absence of full error correction. Despite these constraints, NISQ computing can still deliver tangible value especially in areas such as materials, chemical simulations and optimization.

Zapata has contributed significantly to the advancement of NISQ approaches including pioneering the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), a foundational hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that combines quantum state preparation with classical optimization to estimate molecular and materials properties, with applications to other domains as well.

VQE demonstrated one of the first practical uses of quantum hardware and helped establish the hybrid quantum-classical paradigm that continues to define much of the industry’s progress. Building on this foundation, Zapata develops software and tools that extend hybrid approaches to broader classes of scientific and industrial problems, creating an adaptable framework that evolves with each generation of hardware.

Rapid progress is now being made toward the second phase of quantum computing, known as Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing (FTQC), where error-corrected qubits enable deep, large-scale algorithms with transformative performance. As these systems come online, the race is underway to display what is known as “quantum advantage” or “quantum supremacy” in an increasing number of key problem areas.

The number of announcements by leading FTQC hardware providers has accelerated considerably in recent months - including improvement in qubit coherence times, falling error rates, the demonstration of prototype logical qubits, and the announcement of quantum advantage for some problems. As these breakthroughs accumulate, the focus of progress is shifting toward the application and software layer - where practical utility will first emerge. This is the domain where Zapata Quantum operates.

Unlocking the full potential of FTQC will depend not only on better hardware, but also a mature software stack which will enhance the development of algorithms, compilers, and workflows that translate real-world problems into quantum form. Zapata has proven itself as a leader in this space, with pioneering work across a variety of domains - including chemistry, materials science, optimization, cryptography and machine learning.

By advancing the software infrastructure and application frameworks that will define the next generation of quantum computing, Zapata plays a critical role in enabling the industry’s evolution toward large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum advantage.

Market Opportunity

The quantum computing market is entering what many observers describe as its “readiness phase,” evidenced by Microsoft’s declaration of 2025 as the year of quantum readiness. In 2024, McKinsey & Co. estimated annual global spend on quantum computing technologies of approximately $2 billion, growing at 35% per year, including about $400 million directed to software and services.

While hardware improvements draw attention, the limiting factor to adoption is the absence of a robust, reusable software infrastructure. Enterprises seeking to explore quantum advantage face steep learning curves, fragmented hardware ecosystems, and scarce talent. Zapata addresses these pain points by providing a coherent, hardware-agnostic software stack and associated technical services.

The potential impact of quantum computing technology spans nearly every high-value computational domain:

We believe the software layer will capture a high share of the value created by these solutions to our planet’s most intractable problems. Zapata’s strategy is to occupy this enabling layer - bridging scientific discovery and commercial deployment.

Products

Zapata’s products are organized around what it refers to as the Generalized Quantum Stack - a three-layer model that defines the end-to-end process of quantum application development and execution. This framework, validated through Zapata’s multi-year leadership across all technical areas of DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking program, provides the blueprint for accelerating progress from use case identification to implementation on physical hardware.

Zapata Generalized Quantum Stack

Layer 1: WHY - Use-Case and Utility Benchmark Evaluation

Defines the purpose of quantum computing by assessing quantum-amenable problems and related utility benchmarks across domains such as chemistry, optimization, cryptography, and materials science. This layer involves curating high-utility, domain-driven benchmarks that connect abstract industry challenges to well-defined computational instances. Zapata’s work here includes building repositories of potential applications and developing workflows for systematic problem formulation, addressing a critical gap in how enterprises and researchers determine where quantum advantage will emerge.

Layer 2: WHAT - Algorithm Development and Benchmarking

Focuses on the design of quantum applications and algorithms. Zapata’s tools enable modular algorithm composition, evaluation, and benchmarking to translate domain problems into executable quantum circuits. This layer bridges academic innovation with industrial relevance by combining Zapata’s curated algorithm library and benchmarking datasets with methods for performance comparison across algorithms and hardware types.

Layer 3: HOW - Resource Estimation and Execution

Represents the implementation phase, encompassing resource estimation, compilation, and hybrid execution across quantum and classical backends. Zapata’s platform, Orquestra, provides an environment for orchestrating these workflows, allowing developers to simulate, optimize, and run algorithms on real quantum hardware or high-performance classical infrastructure. This layer ensures forward compatibility as the industry transitions from NISQ systems to FTQC architectures.

Together, these layers define the roadmap for scalable quantum application development. Zapata is the only hardware-agnostic quantum software company to have demonstrated leadership across all three layers of this stack - uniquely positioned to lead the acceleration of the field from theoretical research to practical implementation.

Specific Zapata products within these layers include:

Orquestra

Orquestra is Zapata’s software platform for developing, orchestrating, and executing quantum and hybrid classical/quantum applications. It provides a unified environment for constructing computational workflows that combine classical and quantum resources. Orquestra manages the end-to-end lifecycle: from problem definition through algorithm selection, circuit compilation, resource estimation, execution, and results analysis. The platform has been used in commercial and research settings including with BP, BASF, BBVA, and DARPA.

Bench-Q

Bench-Q was developed under the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Quantum Benchmarking program, where Zapata uniquely participated across all technical areas (TA-1, TA-1.5 and TA-2). Bench-Q provides a standardized framework and software toolkit for evaluating quantum algorithms and hardware performance against utility-driven benchmarks. It defines metrics and workflows that allow researchers to trace the progression from abstract problem instances to executable circuits. The methods and data models produced in Bench-Q are core to Zapata’s commercial products.

Quantum Graph

Quantum Graph (QG) is a structured knowledge base that catalogs quantum use cases, algorithms, and application instances in a graph-based format. It provides a searchable, modular representation of how problems, algorithms, and hardware resources connect, forming a foundation for composable quantum application development. QG is currently in development.

Quantum Pilot

Quantum Pilot (QP) builds upon Quantum Graph by introducing an AI-assisted development environment that helps users compose, test, and refine hybrid quantum-classical workflows. By leveraging machine-learning models to suggest algorithmic building blocks and resource optimizations, Quantum Pilot aims to accelerate the design of viable quantum applications by orders of magnitude relative to manual methods. QP is currently in development.

Services

In-line with our historical activities prior to the cessation of operations in June 2024, we intend to complement our software offerings with high-value technical services to help customers unlock value using Zapata’s software products. Zapata’s service engagements will be performed by teams of quantum scientists, engineers, and domain experts. We expect that certain projects may evolve into longer-term subscriptions to our products, recurring research programs, or joint development agreements that involve co-created or licensed intellectual property.

These services will be strategically important both in the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era and as fault-tolerant quantum computers (FTQC) become commercially available. By embedding its software and expertise in customer workflows today, Zapata intends to position itself as a long-term partner through the industry’s transition from research to scalable deployment.

Customer Value Proposition

Zapata’s quantum application development gives enterprises the confidence to invest in quantum computing with clarity and measurable results. It empowers customers to identify where quantum will create real value, validate that potential through data-driven modeling and benchmarking, and prove performance on real hardware before making costly commitments. By uniting discovery, design, and execution in one hardware-agnostic workflow, Zapata delivers readiness by reducing uncertainty, accelerating time-to-insight, and future-proofing quantum adoption. The result is faster innovation, smarter resource allocation, and tangible evidence of competitive advantage, turning quantum ambition into validated business outcomes.

Customers and Go-To-Market Strategy

The Company has previously executed multi-year contracts and collaborative engagements with leading organizations such as BP, BASF, BBVA, Mitsubishi Chemical, BMW, and Andretti Global, spanning industries including energy, chemicals, financial services, and advanced manufacturing.

In the public sector, Zapata has served as a prime contractor and collaborator under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Quantum Benchmarking (QB) program. It was the only provider chosen to contribute to all technical areas - TA1 (use-case identification and benchmark definition), TA1.5 (algorithm design and implementation), and TA2 (hardware resource estimation and execution) - covering the full spectrum from problem formulation through algorithm development to hardware realization.

Through this work, Zapata developed the foundational methodologies and tooling that now underpin its commercial platforms, including Bench-Q, Orquestra, Quantum Graph and Quantum Pilot, in collaboration with leading universities, government research agencies, and hardware partners.

The Company’s go-to-market strategy combines direct enterprise sales, channel partnerships, and ecosystem collaborations. It also partners with strategy consultancies that serve enterprise clients exploring quantum readiness. This partnership-driven approach amplifies reach while keeping the Company focused on its core software and IP development.

Business Model

Our business model is to provide subscription-based offerings that combine Zapata Quantum software—specifically the Orquestra platform and any modules such as Bench-Q, Quantum Pilot or Quantum Graph which are delivered on top of it—as well as related services to develop and efficiently deploy custom quantum or hybrid quantum-classical computing applications designed to resolve our enterprise customers’ specific problems.

Our primary revenue model is based on subscription payments for our offerings which are utilized to develop and efficiently deploy quantum or hybrid quantum-classical computing applications. Based on our prior operating experience, these engagements typically span use case discovery to prototyping, benchmarking, and ultimately production as quantum hardware advances. We will also, consistent with our historical activity, selectively pursue government contracts related to the advancement of quantum computing applications as a complementary revenue source.

Competition

The quantum computing industry remains early and fragmented. Competition arises from (a) hardware manufacturers developing vertically integrated stacks (e.g., IBM, IonQ, Rigetti), (b) software-focused startups (e.g., Classiq, QC Ware, Horizon Quantum), and (c) internal R&D groups within large enterprises.

Management believes that Zapata’s differentiation derives from several advantages:

These factors position Zapata as the leading pure-play publicly traded quantum software company.

Human Capital

As of October 31, 2025, Zapata had six employees, two of whom are full-time including its Chief Executive Officer. The Company intends to expand its headcount considerably upon raising future financing including the re-hiring of certain employees who were with the Company prior to its restructuring.

To date, Zapata has not experienced any work stoppages and maintains good working relationships with its employees. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement or are represented by labor unions at this time.

Culture

Zapata’s culture is built around its people and network: a global cohort of accomplished scientists, engineers and business professionals. Zapata has, since its founding, demonstrated a commitment to hiring people from diverse backgrounds and locations.

One of Zapata’s core strengths is innovation, not only in its offerings, but also with the mindset of its people. Over the course of Zapata’s eight years in business, employees have, and continue to, organically collaborate in open forums with varying degrees of organization. Examples include, but are not limited to:

Core Values

The company adheres to five core values:

Intellectual Property

Zapata Quantum’s platform is grounded in a broad and growing portfolio of intellectual property that secures its position as a leader in quantum software. The Company’s intellectual property (IP) strategy focuses on protecting core technologies that enable the efficient development, benchmarking, and deployment of quantum and hybrid applications across multiple hardware platforms.

As of October 31, 2025, Zapata Quantum held or had pending more than 60 patents worldwide, spanning the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, and Israel. These patents and applications cover critical methods and systems that define the key control points in quantum software - including program compilation, optimization methods, and information retrieval between classical and quantum computing systems.

Representative Patents

The Company’s early and sustained investment in these domains established Zapata as one of the first companies to secure foundational intellectual property for hybrid quantum-classical computing. The Company believes its intellectual property represents a durable competitive advantage that will be increasingly difficult for competitors to replicate. Zapata continues to evaluate opportunities to assert, license, and expand its IP rights globally to maximize shareholder value and maintain leadership in quantum software innovation.

Research and Development

Research and development (“R&D”) are central to Zapata Quantum’s mission of advancing practical quantum computing. The Company’s R&D program focuses on the creation of scalable algorithmic frameworks, benchmarking methodologies, and AI-assisted development tools that enhance the performance and usability of its software platforms. These initiatives support both near-term hybrid computing and the transition to future fault-tolerant quantum systems.

Zapata’s R&D activities are carried out through close collaboration with government agencies, research consortia, leading universities, and quantum hardware providers. The Company has partnered with multiple academic and national research institutions worldwide, engaging in joint projects that span algorithm design, benchmarking, and system integration. These collaborations help validate Zapata’s technologies in real-world settings and ensure alignment with global scientific and industrial standards.

The Company is also supported by a Scientific Advisory Board composed of prominent researchers and technical leaders from across the globe who are recognized authorities in quantum information science, applied mathematics, and computational physics. This board provides guidance on long-term research directions, peer review of core technologies, and input on emerging scientific and policy trends affecting the quantum ecosystem.

Through these efforts, Zapata seeks to accelerate the development of useful quantum applications while deepening its intellectual-property base. The Company’s integrated research program - combining internal innovation, academic collaboration, and global scientific advisory oversight - positions it to contribute meaningfully to the advancement and commercialization of quantum computing technologies.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, Zapata Quantum may be involved in legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including matters relating to intellectual-property protection, contracts, employment, or regulatory compliance. As of the filing of this report, the Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceeding that, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Government Regulation

We may receive, store, and otherwise process personal information and other data from and about our customers, employees, and from other stakeholders like our vendors. There are numerous federal, state, provincial, local, and international laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, information security, and the storing, sharing, use, processing, transfer, disclosure, retention, and protection of personal information and other content, the scope of which is rapidly changing, subject to differing interpretations and may be inconsistent among regions, countries and states, or conflict with other legal requirements. We strive to comply with applicable laws, regulations, policies, and other legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection, and information security.

In addition, to the extent we operate in foreign markets, we will be subject to additional laws and regulations relating to those operations and the applicable jurisdictions, in addition to U.S. laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of business in foreign jurisdictions.

For a discussion of certain of the government regulations we currently or may in the future face in conducting our business and the risks and uncertainties relating thereto, see Item 1A – Risk Factors contained in this Report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Summary of Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that you should consider before investing in our common stock. Some of the principal risk factors that make an investment in the Company speculative or risky are summarized as follows:

Risks Related to our Financial Condition and Status as an Early Stage Company

Risks Related to our Business and Industry

Risks Related to Competition

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Risks Related to Government Regulation and Litigation

Risks Outside Our Specific Business

Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. Investors should carefully consider the following Risk Factors before deciding whether to invest in the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impair our business operations or our financial condition. If any of the events discussed in the Risk Factors below occur, our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the value and marketability of our securities could decline.

Risks Related to Zapata’s Financial Condition and Status as an early-stage Company

We will need additional capital to continue as a going concern, implement our business plan or respond to business opportunities or unforeseen circumstances and such financing may not be available.

Through October 31, 2025, we have funded our operations primarily with proceeds from sales of preferred stock, promissory notes and warrants. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to effect or continue to identify future debt or equity financing and generate profitable operations from our operations. Management estimates needing to raise at least an additional $5 million to establish and continue operations over the next 12 months under our current business plan. There can be no assurance that such capital will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us. Further, the Company has not generated any revenue since September 2024, and does not expect to generate any revenue unless and until it can re-commence material operations which will be dependent on our ability to raise sufficient capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our business plan also contemplates a substantial scaling of Zapata across all departments, including science, software engineering, and product design, in order to launch multiple products and/or offerings in a timely manner to obtain and preserve a competitive advantage. This scaling will require substantial capital at a time when we project we will be operating at a loss and in which we have limited capital and other resources with which to execute our business plan, and this process may take longer than we anticipate. Consequently, our expansion is limited in proportion to our growth in revenue and available capital, as well as by our limited personnel and infrastructure. The capital required to sustain our business during this period may be greater than anticipated. In addition, presently unforeseen opportunities or circumstances may require capital beyond what we currently project. The period during which we expect to operate at a loss may be extended by circumstances beyond our control.

We may obtain additional financing through public or private equity or debt financings (subject to the limitations under our outstanding agreements and debt instruments) that may result in dilution to stockholders, the issuance of securities with priority as to liquidation and/or dividend and other rights more favorable than the Common Stock, or the imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations or other restrictions that may adversely affect our business. For example, as of October 31, 2025, we have outstanding an aggregate principal amount of $4 million in secured promissory notes (collectively, the “Secured Notes”). Included in the Secured Notes is a senior secured promissory note (in the aggregate principal amount of $1 million the “Senior Secured Note”). This Senior Secured Note, among other things, converts at the option of the holder at $8.50 per share of Common Stock and prohibits Legacy Zapata from issuing additional indebtedness and undertaking certain other actions, subject to limited exceptions, which may prevent or limit us from raising further capital or engaging in strategic transactions in the future. In addition, the other Secured Notes (the “2025 Notes”) have a total outstanding principal amount of $3 million, mature on June 12, 2026 (subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default or a change of control), and bear 10% per annum interest. These 2025 Notes are convertible into shares of Common Stock at the option of the holder based on a conversion price of $0.04 per share, subject to certain adjustments. These 2025 Notes convert automatically upon the Company’s completion of a securities offering resulting in gross proceeds of at least $5 million. The Company also issued warrants to purchase a total of 37,500,000 shares of Common Stock to the investors of the 2025 Notes.

There is no guarantee that future financing will be at financial terms equal to or more favorable than those described above or that our existing indebtedness will not limit or prevent us from raising capital in the future, and we may need to enter into future equity or, if available, debt financing at significantly less favorable terms. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy.

We may also seek additional financing even if in our view such additional financing is not required in order to take advantage of favorable market conditions or for strategic considerations. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, or at all. The inability to obtain such additional financing if needed may adversely affect our ability to operate at the levels necessary to execute our business plan or may force us into bankruptcy.

We have a history of operating losses, which are expected to continue for the foreseeable future.

We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception. We incurred net losses of $38.2 million and $29.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and we have a cumulative deficit since the formation of Legacy Zapata in November 2017 through December 31, 2024 of approximately $127.7 million. Since 2024, we have continued to incur net losses. We believe that we will continue to incur operating and net losses each quarter at least for the foreseeable future. The size of future losses will depend on several factors, including the degree to which we seek to establish and expand our scientific, product, software engineering, sales and other teams, and the revenue that we can generate from sales of our quantum computing application development solutions. Our operating expenses have increased as a result of becoming a public company and we expect that our expenses will continue to increase as we grow our business, including hiring and re-hiring personnel as we seek to re-establish material operations as part of our ongoing restructuring efforts in 2025.

We are an early stage company with a limited operating history, in a nascent industry, making it difficult to forecast future results.

We were founded in 2017 to develop and provide software with related services and proprietary IP to utilize quantum math on classical and future quantum hardware. In late 2024, due to financial difficulties we temporarily suspended our operations. In June 2025, following restructuring efforts and conversion of certain outstanding indebtedness into equity, we shifted our business focus from artificial intelligence (AI) to quantum computing software and solutions. Our ability to re-establish material operations and generate revenue will be dependent upon our ability to access sufficient capital for such purpose. The market focus for our quantum computing application development solutions and the use of quantum math and algorithms are nascent fields with uncertainty on future market uptake and in technological progress in the field.

There can be no assurance that we can or will meet the challenges commonly faced by early stage companies, including the need to scale operations and to achieve and manage rapid growth. A number of factors could cause our efforts to be adversely impacted, including any inability to raise the necessary capital needed to re-establish material operations and pursue our business objectives, increased competition, lesser-than-expected growth or contraction of our overall market, our inability to accurately forecast demand for our customer offerings, our inability to establish sales or other partnerships with service firms, an inability to develop repeatable solutions, an inability to grow our team, or our failure, for any reason, to capitalize on growth opportunities. We have encountered and will encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by early stage companies in rapidly changing industries, such as the risks and uncertainties described herein. We cannot provide assurance that we can meet the challenges faced by all companies, including established companies, in rapidly changing or nascent industries. The failure to address these challenges successfully or promptly could have a material adverse effect on our future operating results and financial condition.

We may not be able to scale our business and quantum computing application development solutions quickly enough to meet customer and market demand and to remain competitive in the market for quantum computing application development solutions.

In order to establish and grow our business, we will need to re-establish and scale material operations in every area from our existing start-up capacity. These challenges will require that we:

If we cannot successfully overcome these challenges and manage the organizational growth required to do so, then our business, including our ability to establish and maintain a competitive place in the market, financial condition, and profitability, may be materially adversely affected.

Our assets are pledged to the holders of the Secured Notes and failure to repay obligations to these noteholders when due, or any other default events, will have a material adverse effect on our business and could result in foreclosure on these assets.

In connection with the issuance of Secured Notes, the Company entered into Security Agreements and an Intercreditor Agreement with Acquiom Agency Services LLC as collateral agent on behalf of the noteholders (collectively, the “Security Agreement”). The Security Agreement creates a security interest in all of the property of Zapata and its subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions specified in the Security Agreement (the “Collateral”). Pursuant to the Security Agreement, each of Zapata Computing, Inc. and Zapata Government Services, Inc. has agreed to guarantee the obligations of the Company under the Security Agreement and the Secured Notes.

Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Security Agreement, the collateral agent will have certain rights under the Security Agreement, including the right to take control of the Collateral and, in certain circumstances, sell the Collateral to cover obligations owed to the holders of the Secured Notes pursuant to its terms. “Event of Default” under the Security Agreement means (i) any default of the terms, conditions or covenants of the Security Agreement (after giving effect to any applicable grace or cure period) and any event of default under the Secured Notes, which includes any failure to pay any principal or interest payment on the due date or any other payments required under the terms of the Secured Notes, a breach of any other covenant under the Secured Notes, and entering into any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. Any such default would have a material adverse effect on Legacy Zapata’s and, by extension, our, business and our stockholders could lose their entire investment in us.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including regular attestations by management concerning its internal control over financial reporting. Management may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to these increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements. If we are not able to implement the additional requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”) in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may not be able to assess whether our internal control over financial reporting is effective and may fail to provide timely and accurate financial information to investors. This may subject us to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time consuming, and costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems, and resources. We will need to hire additional accounting and financial personnel in order to achieve these goals.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The controls required are not currently in place; however, we are working to develop and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we will file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. We are also working to design and maintain our internal control over financial reporting.

Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may be inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. In addition, changes in accounting principles or interpretations could also challenge our internal controls and require that we establish new business processes, systems, and controls to accommodate such changes. We have limited experience with implementing the systems and controls that will be necessary to operate as a public company, as well as adopting changes in accounting principles or interpretations mandated by the relevant regulatory bodies. Additionally, if these new systems, controls, or standards and the associated process changes do not give rise to the benefits that we expect or do not operate as intended, it could adversely affect our financial reporting systems and processes, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and/or our ability to produce timely and accurate financial reports. Moreover, our business may be harmed if we experience problems with any new systems and controls, resulting in delayed implementation or increased costs to correct any issues.

Further, in addition to the material weaknesses described in the Risk Factor which follows and elsewhere in this Report, weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our business or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. That failure could result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Those reports will eventually be included in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls or internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our Common Stock.

Any failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could harm our business and could cause a decline in the trading price of our Common Stock.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate these weaknesses, identify additional material weaknesses in the future, or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in misstatements in our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet periodic reporting obligations, or cause our access to capital markets to be impaired.

In connection with the preparation and audit of our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, material weaknesses have been identified in its internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The material weaknesses we identified include:

These material weaknesses could result in a misstatement of account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to our combined annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

In an effort to remediate the material weaknesses, we have retained an accounting consulting firm to provide additional depth and breadth to our technical accounting and financial reporting capabilities. We intend to engage internal control consultants to assist us in performing a risk assessment to identify relevant risks and specify needed objectives. With their assistance, we intend to formalize and communicate our policies and procedures surrounding our financial close, financial reporting and other accounting processes, and to further develop and document necessary policies and procedures regarding our internal control over financial reporting, such that we are able to perform a Section 404 analysis of our internal control over financial reporting when and as required. We cannot assure that these measures will significantly improve or remediate the material weaknesses described above. We also cannot assure that we have identified all or that we will not have additional material weaknesses in the future. Accordingly, a material weakness may still exist when we report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for purposes of our management’s required attestation. Further, while we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm.

We have incurred and expect to incur additional costs to remediate these control deficiencies, though there can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful or that we will avoid potential future material weaknesses. If we are unable to successfully remediate our existing or any future material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, or if we identify any additional material weaknesses, the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting may be adversely affected, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting, and our stock price may decline as a result. We also could become subject to investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

Our ability to use existing or future net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes may be limited.

We have incurred net operating losses (“NOLs”) for tax purposes for each year since our incorporation and we expect to continue to operate at a loss for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2024 we had a cumulative U.S. federal carryforward of approximately $68.8 million and a cumulative state NOL carryforward of approximately $39.7 million. If not utilized, the state NOLs will expire at various dates through 2044. The U.S. federal NOLs generated after 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely. Under the Code, the deductibility of the U.S. federal NOL carryforward as of December 31, 2024 and all future U.S. federal NOL carryforwards is limited to 80% of taxable income, limiting or delaying in part the use of NOL carryforwards if and when we cease operating at a loss. We may potentially use these U.S. federal and state NOLs to offset taxable income for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes. However, the use of these NOLs may be subject to numerous limitations under the Code and under state tax laws. Among such limitations, Section 382 of the Code may limit the use of these NOLs in any year for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the event of certain past or future changes in ownership of us or Legacy Zapata. An ownership change under Section 382 of the Code, referred to in this discussion as an ownership change, generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of a company’s stock increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. We have not conducted a Section 382 study to determine whether the use of our NOLs is impaired under Section 382 of the Code as a result of any prior ownership change. We may have previously undergone one or more ownership changes. An ownership change in respect of us also could be deemed to be an ownership change in respect of Legacy Zapata. The Merger, or future issuances or sales of our securities, including certain transactions involving our securities that are outside of our control, could result in ownership changes. Ownership changes that have occurred in the past or that may occur in the future could result in the imposition of an annual limit under Section 382 of the Code on the amount of pre ownership change NOLs and other tax attributes that we or Legacy Zapata could use to reduce our taxable income, potentially increasing or accelerating its liability for income taxes, and also potentially causing those tax attributes to expire unused.

States may impose similar limitations on the use of applicable NOLs. We have recorded a valuation allowance related to NOL carryforwards and other deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of the ultimate realization of the future benefits of those assets.

Any limitation on using NOLs, whether under Section 382 of the Code or otherwise under U.S. federal or state tax laws, could, depending on the extent of such limitation and the NOLs previously used, result in Legacy Zapata or us retaining less cash after payment of U.S. federal and state income taxes in respect of any year in which we have taxable income, rather than losses, than we would be entitled to retain if such NOLs were available as an offset against such income for U.S. federal and state income tax reporting purposes, which could adversely impact our operating results.

Risks Related to our Business and Industry

Failure of quantum computing solutions in general and our quantum computing application development solutions in particular to satisfy customer demands or to achieve increased market acceptance would adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and growth prospects, and the current state of the quantum computing industry is still new and rapidly evolving, so there is no guarantee that it will succeed.

When we re-commence material operations, we expect to derive substantially all of our revenue from our quantum computing application development software and related services. Accordingly, the market acceptance of quantum computing in general - and our quantum computing solutions in particular - is critical to our continued success.

The market for quantum computing is still in its early stages and is rapidly evolving. Adoption depends on customer awareness of the potential benefits of quantum computing over classical methods, the continued progress of underlying hardware, and the availability of practical quantum algorithms and workflows. There is no assurance that quantum computing will achieve large scale commercial viability or that customers will adopt our products at the rate or in the manner we anticipate.

Demand for our solutions is affected by factors largely beyond our control, including the pace of hardware advancement, competitive product introductions, data-security and regulatory considerations, and general macroeconomic conditions. Further, the use of quantum technology is not widespread and is generally limited to certain specific types of organizations and activities, and our prospective customer base will therefore be limited. We expect the needs of our customers to continue to evolve and grow in complexity as the industry progresses toward fault-tolerant quantum computing. To remain competitive, we must continually enhance the functionality, performance, and usability of our software and services to meet these changing demands.

If the market fails to achieve broad acceptance of quantum computing or our application development solutions do not meet with sufficient customer demand, or if we fail to keep pace with rapid technological change, our business, operating results, and growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

While significant progress has been made in advancing quantum hardware, the commercial utility of quantum computing remains largely unproven. As the technology is applied to new domains such as chemistry, materials science, optimization, cryptography, and machine learning, it is possible that performance gains may be more limited than current forecasts suggest. Techniques we or others develop could quickly become obsolete as new methods or architectures emerge. Because many of our competitors are larger companies with greater resources, they may be able to incorporate new techniques or access next-generation hardware more rapidly than we can.

There can also be no assurance that our analysis of the eventual market need for quantum computing is correct. If our assessment proves inaccurate, the future value of our products and services, our competitive position, and our profitability could be materially lower than we currently anticipate.

Our business plan could suffer if we are not able to establish and grow contractual relationships with third parties or enter into certain important strategic partnerships, and if we are unable to ensure that our quantum computing application development solutions interoperate with computing hardware or software that are developed by others, we may become less competitive and our resulting operations may be harmed.

As a quantum computing application development company, our solutions must provide our customers with the ability to use products of third parties, such as quantum processors and classical computing resources, which we do not manufacture. The cost or availability of these dependencies could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including the transition to a clean energy economy, local and regional environmental regulations, and geopolitical disruptions. Our quantum computing application development solutions must integrate with a variety of hardware and software platforms, and we need to continuously modify and enhance our quantum and classical software libraries to adapt to changes in hardware and software technologies. In particular, we have developed our quantum development frameworks to be able to easily integrate with key third-party applications, including the applications of software providers that compete with us as well as our partners. In general, we are and will be subject to standard terms and conditions of such providers and open source licenses, which govern the distribution, operation, and fees of such software systems, and which are subject to change by such providers from time to time. Our business will be harmed if any provider of such software systems:

Third-party services and products are constantly evolving, and we may not be able to modify our quantum computing application development solutions to assure their compatibility with that of other third parties as they continue to develop or emerge in the future or we may not be able to make such modifications in a timely and cost-effective manner. In addition, some of our competitors may be able to disrupt the operations or compatibility of our quantum development frameworks with their products or services, or exert strong business influence on our ability to, and terms on which we, operate our quantum computing application development solutions. Should any of our competitors modify their products or standards in a manner that degrades the functionality of our quantum development frameworks or gives preferential treatment to our competitors or competitive products, whether to enhance their competitive position or for any other reason, the interoperability of our quantum computing application development solutions with these products could decrease and our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be harmed. If we are not permitted or able to integrate with these and other third-party applications in the future, our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be harmed.

Our business plan could suffer if we are not able to enter into important strategic partnerships.

As part of our growth plans, we expect to expand, sell to, with, and through partners, including developing repeatable solutions built with services firms, and developing partnerships with hardware providers, system integrators and consulting services firms. However, our relationships with these partners may not result in additional business. If we are unable to enter into beneficial and contractual strategic partnerships, or further its relationship with existing partners, or is unable to do so on favorable terms, then its growth could be limited or delayed.

If we cannot manage our growth effectively, we may not become profitable.

Businesses, including development stage companies such as ours which often grow rapidly, tend to have difficulty managing their growth. If we are able to successfully market our products and services, we will likely need to expand our management team and other key personnel by recruiting and employing experienced executives and key employees and/or consultants capable of providing the necessary support.

As described elsewhere in this Report, we are in the process of developing and/or pursuing business plans for relatively novel technology in an industry that remains in its infant stages, and which involves a unique business model and would take substantial time and resources to execute and develop into a revenue generating enterprise. We cannot assure you that our management will be able to manage our growth effectively or successfully. Our failure to meet these challenges could cause us to lose money, and your investment could be lost.

We are highly dependent on our key employees.

Our ability to achieve our goals will depend heavily on our Chief Executive Officer and key employees. In late 2024 and early 2025, most of our key personnel left the Company due to our financial difficulties and suspension of operations. We have since re-hired three such individuals, and will need to re-hire and/or find suitable replacement or supplemental personnel in order to commence material operations and execute on our business plan. The procurement and retention of these key employees and consultants, together with additional key hires, is critical to the long-term success of the Company. All of our personnel, including the are “at will” employees who could leave the Company to accept alternative employment at any time. The more success we achieve serves to increase the risk that competitors, including large, well-established companies with far greater resources, will seek to hire our employees, including key employees. The loss of any key employee, especially to a competitor, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including by delaying the roll-out of products or diminishing the quantity or quality of our scientific output. Further, our industry and operations are highly specialized, and the loss of key personnel would therefore impose substantial challenges on us, and we may be unable to locate and hire suitable replacements on favorable terms or at all, and could lose competitive advantages, market share, and the ability to operate as planned as a result of the loss of certain key personnel.

Our future success is also highly dependent on locating and hiring highly qualified key employees, both to replace any losses of key employees, including following our previous reductions in force, as well as to supplement our current employees. If we are unable to grant sufficient or competitive compensation, including equity awards and bonuses, we may be unable to attract new or retain key employees.

The failure to attract and retain additional qualified personnel or to maintain our company culture could harm our business and prevent us from executing our business strategy.

To execute our business strategy, we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for executives, data scientists, engineers, software developers, sales personnel, and other key employees in our industry is intense. In particular, we compete with many other companies for employees with high levels of expertise in quantum computing, computer science, mathematics, and enterprise software, as well as sales and operations professionals, which are specialized fields with limited pools of qualified candidates with the knowledge, education, training and experience needed to fill various roles that will be critical to our operations. As disclosed above, we will need to hire additional personnel to execute our business plan. At times, we have experienced, and we may continue to experience, difficulty in hiring personnel who meet the demands of our selection process and with appropriate qualifications, experience, or expertise, and we may not be able to fill positions as quickly as desired, particularly in light of our previous reductions in workforce. Potential candidates may not perceive our compensation package, including our equity awards, or our future prospects as favorably as employees hired in the past which may render recruiting and retaining qualified individuals more difficult. In addition, our recruiting personnel, methodology, and approach may need to be altered to address a changing candidate pool and profile. We may not be able to identify or implement such changes in a timely manner.

Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel have greater resources than we have, and some of these companies may offer more attractive compensation packages. If the perceived value of our equity awards declines, or if the mix of equity and cash compensation that we offer is unattractive, it may adversely affect our ability to recruit and retain highly skilled employees. Our ability to offer attractive compensation packages to our current and prospective employees is limited by our limited capital resources and our reliance on equity compensation which may be viewed as less attractive based on the prices and lack of liquidity of our Common Stock.

Additionally, laws and regulations, such as restrictive immigration laws, or export control laws, may limit our ability to recruit internationally. We must also continue to retain and motivate existing employees through our compensation practices, company culture, and career development opportunities.

Companies with greater resources than we have in the past recruited or attempted to recruit our employees. If we cannot retain these employees, it may adversely affect our ability to deliver on our quantum computing application development solutions. Furthermore, third-party offers to our employees of greater compensation have in the past forced and may in the future force us to offer significant additional compensation, which may adversely impact our financial performance, and we are limited in issuing equity by the number of shares reserved for issuance under our equity plans. Additionally, continued high inflation, without regard to competition, may require us to increase compensation and failure to do so might impact our employee retention. Such increases would also adversely impact our financial performance.

We believe that a critical component to our success and our ability to retain our best people is our culture. As we continue to grow and develop a public company infrastructure, we may find it difficult to maintain our company culture. If we fail to attract new personnel or to retain our current personnel, our business would be harmed.

Our business is dependent on growing and retaining competitive teams of sufficient size in the areas of algorithm development, product development, and software engineering; the failure to achieve any one of these objectives could materially affect our business.

Our core business model is to develop and sell software capable of delivering quantum computing application development solutions to enterprise customers at scale and services in connection with such software. This requires a science team to develop algorithms, capable of addressing valuable problems using quantum techniques and other mathematics. This requires a product development team that can describe software that not only is able to use the quantum techniques developed by its team, but also is able to handle enterprise production issues at scale. It also requires a software engineering team that can implement the product design through products that comply with the myriad legal and enterprise information technology (“IT”) requirements and are robust enough to function in an enterprise production environment. Finally, these teams must have the capacity to complete their respective tasks in time to be of value to the market.

The ability to hire the personnel required to execute our business plan depends, in part, on the availability of qualified applicants, something which is beyond our control. Quantum information processing is a relatively new field and are inherently difficult. Although the pool of qualified quantum scientists and software engineers is growing, it is limited and competition for that talent is global and aggressive, pitting us against large, well-established companies with larger financial resources than we have, as well as programs sponsored by foreign countries. In addition, limitations in or changes to immigration and work permit laws and regulations or the administration or interpretation of those laws could impair our ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees.

There is no assurance that we will be able to hire and retain an adequate number of quantum scientists, product design specialists, and/or software engineers with the qualifications required to execute our business plan. Our failure to build and maintain any one or more of these requisite teams could have a material adverse effect on our future prospects.

Our estimate of market opportunities may prove to be inaccurate.

At present, there is no mature market for quantum computing solutions. This creates significant uncertainty in determining the potential market for our quantum computing application development solutions. For example, estimates on the current and potential total addressable market for quantum computing as an industry are based on third-party estimates and our own internal judgment, both of which may be materially inaccurate. There can be no assurance that our or third-party estimates of the potential total addressable market for quantum computing are correct, and such numbers do not account for the substantially more limited service obtainable market for our quantum computing application development solutions. Additionally, our market opportunities, future prospects, and future profitability will be materially lessened by delays in widespread enterprise adoption of quantum computing, if enterprises adopt quantum computing at all, which would reduce the relevant total addressable market.

Our business depends on our ability to attract new customers and on our existing customers purchasing additional subscriptions from us and/or renewing their existing subscriptions.

To establish material revenue following the suspension of our operations and to increase our revenue, we must attract new customers. As an early stage company, we have limited experience with sales and, in particular, sales to our target large enterprise customers. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the level of adoption of our quantum computing application development solutions. Quantum computing is a new and evolving industry, so the level of adoption is uncertain. Numerous factors may impede our ability to add new customers, including but not limited to, our failure to compete effectively against alternative products or services, to attract and effectively train new sales and marketing personnel, to develop relationships with partners, to successfully innovate and deploy new applications and other solutions, to provide a quality customer experience and customer services, including increasing our employee headcount to provide for additional service providers, or to ensure the effectiveness of our marketing programs. If we are not able to attract customers, it will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our current quantum computing application development solutions, as well as applications, features, and functionality that we may introduce in the future or that we offer but have not yet sold, may not be widely accepted by our customers or may receive negative attention, each of which may lower our margins and harm our business.

Our ability to engage, retain, and increase our base of customers and to establish and increase our revenue will depend on our ability to successfully market our existing quantum computing application development solutions, as well as create new applications, features, and functionality. We may introduce significant changes to our existing quantum computing application development solutions or develop and introduce new applications, including technologies with which we have little or no prior development or operating experience. These new applications and updates, as well as our existing solutions that we have marketed but not yet sold, may fail to engage, retain, and increase our base of customers or may suffer from lag in adoption. New applications may initially suffer from performance and quality issues that may negatively impact our ability to market and sell such applications to new and existing customers. The short- and long-term impact of any major change to our quantum computing application development solutions, or the introduction of new applications or initial sales of our applications to enterprise customers, is particularly difficult to predict. If new or enhanced applications fail to engage, retain, and increase our base of customers, we may fail to generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments in such applications, any of which may harm our business.

If the market for our quantum computing application development solutions fails to develop or grow as we expect, or if businesses fail to adopt our quantum computing application development solutions, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

It is difficult to predict customer adoption rates and demand for our quantum computing application development solutions, the entry of competitive software, platforms and services. A substantial majority of our revenue in past periods came from, and we expect future revenue will come from, sales of our subscription-based software and related services, which we expect to continue for the foreseeable future if and when we re-commence sales of our products and services which will depend on our ability to raise sufficient capital. We cannot be sure that the quantum computing market will continue to grow or, even if it does grow, that businesses will adopt our quantum computing application development solutions. Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to create a market for quantum computing application development solutions. Our ability to create such a market depends on a number of factors, including the cost, performance, and perceived value associated with our quantum computing application development solutions. Potential customers may have made significant investments in classical computing systems and may be unwilling to invest in new platforms and applications, and may prefer to work with larger, more established companies that have entered the broader quantum computing market. If the quantum computing market fails to develop or grows more slowly than we currently expect, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our business plan relies upon the adoption of our quantum computing application development solutions by enterprise customers.

Our primary targeted customers are large enterprises with intractable problems that require addressing at scale. The success of our business plan, therefore, materially depends upon our ability to sell our quantum computing application development solutions to such large enterprise customers. Sales to such customers involve risks that are different from or greater than risks involved in selling to smaller customers. Such risks include difficulties associated with longer sales, product, evaluation, and implementation cycles; higher customer-tailored requests and greater bargaining power on the part of the customer; and more intense competition from vendors who have been providing other software and services for years to the customer and are embedded in the customer’s IT infrastructure. If we are not able to overcome these risks and successfully establish a meaningful share of the enterprise market, then its business prospects and future profitability could suffer.

Our sales cycles are expected to be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts will require considerable time and expense.

Our results of operations may fluctuate, in part, because of the complexity of customer problems that our quantum computing application development solutions address, the resource-intensive nature of our sales efforts, the length and variability of the sales cycle for our offerings, and the difficulty in making short-term adjustments to our operating expenses. The timing of our sales is difficult to predict. The length of our sales cycle, from initial evaluation to payment for our subscriptions and related services can vary substantially from customer to customer and could extend over a number of years for some customers. Our sales efforts are expected to involve educating our customers about the use, technical capabilities, and benefits of our offerings. Customers often undertake a prolonged evaluation process. In addition, the size of potential customers may lead to longer sales cycles. We may also face unexpected deployment challenges with large organizations or more complicated deployment of our offerings. Large organizations may demand additional features, support services, and pricing concessions or require additional security management or control features. Some organizations may also require an on-premise solution rather than a cloud solution, which potentially requires additional implementation time and potentially a longer sales cycle. We may spend substantial time, effort and money on sales efforts to large organizations without any assurance that our efforts will produce any sales. As a result, it is difficult to predict exactly when, or even if, we will make a sale to a potential customer or if we can increase sales to existing customers.

Individual sales can be part of a long sales cycle, which impacts our ability to plan and manage cash flows and margins. These large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in quarters subsequent to those we anticipated, or have not occurred at all. If our sales cycle lengthens or our substantial upfront investments do not result in sufficient revenue to justify our investments, our operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, within each quarter, it is difficult to project which month a deal will close. Therefore, it is difficult to determine whether we are achieving our quarterly expectations and whether we will achieve annual expectations. We may fail to budget and manage costs and operating expenses or anticipate working capital needs. Therefore, if expectations for our business are not accurate, we may not be able to adjust our cost structure on a timely basis, and our margins and cash flows may differ from expectations.

If we fail to respond to rapid technological changes, extend our quantum computing application development solutions, or develop new features and functionality, our ability to remain competitive could be impaired.

The market for our quantum computing application development solutions is characterized by rapid technological change, particularly since quantum computing is a new and evolving industry, including frequent new hardware and software introductions and enhancements, changing customer demands, and evolving industry standards. The introduction of software embodying new technologies can quickly make existing software obsolete and unmarketable. Quantum computing is inherently complex, and it can take a long time and require significant research and development expenditures to develop and test new or enhanced methods and solutions. The success of any enhancements or improvements to our existing quantum computing application development solutions or any new applications depends on several factors, including timely completion, competitive pricing, adequate quality testing, integration with existing technologies, and overall market acceptance, particularly as we provide custom solutions for specific use cases.

Any failure of our quantum computing application development solutions to operate effectively with future infrastructure platforms and technologies could impact our ability to attain new customers and generate revenue therefrom. If we are unable to respond to these changes in a timely and cost-effective manner, our quantum computing application development solutions may become less marketable, less competitive, or obsolete, and our business may be adversely affected.

The introduction of new quantum computing platforms and applications by competitors or the development of entirely new technologies to replace existing offerings could make our quantum computing application development solutions obsolete or adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. We may experience difficulties with software development, design, or marketing that could delay or prevent our development, introduction, or implementation of new quantum computing application development solutions, features, or capabilities, applying our existing quantum computing application development solutions to new use cases. Any delays could result in adverse publicity, loss of revenue or market acceptance, or claims by customers brought against us, all of which could harm our business.

Our business could be negatively impacted by delays in development of our software platform.

We have plans, including raising sufficient capital and obtaining adequate staffing and other resources, that we believe if successfully executed will result in the development of and continued improvements to our software platform on a schedule that permits the execution of our business plan in a timely manner. Any delays in platform design and engineering work required to accomplish this could result in corresponding delays in the implementation of our business plan in the market. We are presently unaware of any outstanding design or engineering issues that cannot be resolved in the normal course, but the failure to complete necessary components of or improvements to its platform in a timely manner would have a serious negative impact on the company and might cause the company to fail.

Any failure to offer high-quality support services for our customers may harm our relationships with our customers and, consequently, our business.

Once our quantum computing application development solutions are deployed, customers will depend on our services teams to resolve technical and operational issues relating to our quantum computing application development solutions. Our ability to provide effective support will largely be dependent on our ability to attract, train, and retain qualified personnel with experience in interfacing with customers. If the number of our customers grows, this will put additional pressure on our customer services teams. We may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate short-term increases in customer demand for support. We also may be unable to modify the future, scope, and delivery of our support to compete with changes in the services provided by our competitors. Increased customer demand for support services, without corresponding revenue, could increase costs and negatively affect our operating results. In addition, if we experience increased customer demand for support, we may face increased costs that may harm our results of operations. If our customer base expands, we will need to hire additional support staff to deliver and support our quantum computing application development solutions, and our business may be harmed. Our ability to attract and retain customers is highly dependent on our business reputation and on our ability to deliver value to customers. Any failure to deliver value, or a perception that we do not deliver value for our customers, would harm our business.

Sales to government entities and highly regulated organizations are subject to a number of challenges and risks.

We selectively pursue U.S. government contracts as a complementary revenue source. We may also target highly regulated organizations. Sales to such entities are subject to a number of challenges and risks. Selling to such entities can be highly competitive, expensive, and time consuming, often requiring significant upfront time and expense without any assurance that these efforts will generate a sale. Government contracting requirements may change and in doing so restrict our ability to sell into the government sector. Government demand and payment for our quantum computing application development solutions may be affected by public sector budgetary cycles and funding authorizations, with funding reductions or delays adversely affecting public sector demand for our quantum computing application development solutions.

Further, governmental and highly regulated entities may demand contract terms that differ from our standard arrangements and may be less favorable than terms agreed with private sector customers.

Contracts with governmental entities may also include preferential pricing terms, including, but not limited to, “most favored customer” pricing. In the event that we are successful in being awarded a government contract, such award may be subject to appeals, disputes, or litigation, including but not limited to bid protests by unsuccessful bidders.

As a government contractor or subcontractor, we will be required to comply with laws, regulations, and contractual provisions relating to the formation, administration, and performance of government contracts, which affect how we and our partners do business with government agencies. As a result of actual or perceived noncompliance with government contracting laws, regulations, or contractual provisions, we may be subject to non-ordinary course audits and internal investigations which may prove costly to our business financially, divert management time, or limit our ability to continue selling our products and services to our government customers. These laws and regulations may impose other added costs on our business, and failure to comply with these or other applicable regulations and requirements, including non-compliance in the past, could lead to claims for damages from our channel partners, downward contract price adjustments or refund obligations, civil or criminal penalties, and termination of contracts and suspension or debarment from government contracting for a period of time with government agencies. Any such damages, penalties, disruption, or limitation in our ability to do business with a government would adversely impact, and could have a material adverse effect on, our business, results of operations, financial condition, public perception and growth prospects.

Governmental and highly regulated entities may have statutory, contractual, or other legal rights to terminate contracts with us or our partners for convenience or for other reasons. Any such termination may adversely affect our ability to contract with other government customers as well as our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations. All these factors can add further risk to business conducted with these customers. If sales expected from a government entity or highly regulated organization for a particular quarter are not realized in that quarter or at all, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Our success could be materially affected by problems with or defects in the Orquestra platform or our other software offerings.

In addition to issues commonly facing all providers of commercial software, the development of our quantum computing application development solutions involves converting novel, complex scientific algorithms into software code. We may experience unintended design and/or implementation defects or other quality issues in our software code. We may also experience defects in the products and services of third parties on which we rely to provide our products and services, including third-party cloud providers. Problems can be caused by a variety of factors, including premature or failed introduction of new products, vulnerabilities or defects in proprietary and open source software, human error or misconduct, design limitations, or denial of service or other security-related incidents. We do not have a contractual right with our public cloud providers that will compensate us for any losses due to availability interruptions in the public cloud.

Any defects in the Orquestra platform or other software offerings, whether caused by defective design, defective coding, or defects introduced through third-party components; any disruptions in our ability to provide our quantum computing application development solutions, including by means of public cloud; and/or any other quality issues with our quantum computing application development solutions could affect our business reputation and brand, could cause us to spend material amounts to address the defects, could cause material delays in the execution of our business plan, and could have a material adverse effect on our business opportunities, revenue, and future profitability.

The pursuit of inorganic growth opportunities could result in harm to our business.

We may pursue growth opportunities by acquiring complementary businesses or other assets for strategic purposes, such as companies with products and services used in, complementary to, or overlapping with our offerings; companies with an IP portfolio that could complement ours; companies with customer lists that could shorten the sales cycle to significant customers. The pursuit of such strategic opportunities could be both expensive and distracting, could have a significant impact on the company’s capital structure, and even if the transaction is completed as desired the results may not be as predicted. To the extent such opportunities may arise, there can be no assurance that the pursuit of any such opportunities will succeed and, if they fail, they could have a material adverse effect on our business and future profitability.

Risks Related to Competition

Competitors may develop products and technologies that are superior to our quantum computing application development solutions.

Our business plan is based on the belief that the value of our quantum computing application development solutions will be enhanced by delivering, in a single unified software platform, the ability to: allow deployment in any desired environment; permit the development or implementation of applications and services that are capable of data handling tasks, including processing data in a manner calculated to maximize the performance of quantum and hybrid computing solutions, and leveraging AI to accelerate quantum application development. While we believe our approach is differentiated, other companies are actively developing quantum software, benchmarking, and workflow tools that may overlap with or compete against ours. Further, a prolonged delay in re-launching material operations and commencing sales will give our competitors a timing advantage to enter and pursue market opportunities which we may have otherwise have had an opportunity to pursue, which delay and resulting disadvantage will continue until we can raise sufficient capital and hire the necessary personnel to pursuant our business plan.

Many of our existing and potential competitors have, or could have, substantial competitive advantages such as:

There can be no guarantee that a competitor will not develop a product superior to ours or one that is perceived by the market to be superior. Nor can there be any guarantee that a combination of products will not be able to provide solutions that are superior, or are perceived to be superior, to our quantum computing application development solutions. The introduction of such a product or combination of products could have a material adverse effect on our business, profitability, and financial condition.

The quantum computing industry is highly competitive and we may not be successful in establishing ourself as a viable competitor without regard to the value of our quantum computing application development solutions.

Quantum computing is an industry with great promise that has attracted global interest and participation. In addition, the recent rapid rise of the quantum computing industry has given rise to less-established public and private companies, including new startups, which may compete, in whole or in part, with our products and services. This competition in the market for quantum computing is already great and is expected to intensify over time.

To compete successfully in this market, we must develop our products and technologies in a timely manner, effectively market these products against multiple competitors, and support these products at levels expected by enterprise customers. Delays in the introduction of products and services may cause potential customers to adopt competitors’ products, making it difficult or impossible for our products later to displace the competitive products without regard to the relative value of the respective products.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to timely deliver products that will result in us having a material share of this market, even if our products are superior. Our inability to establish a position and market share in this highly competitive industry will adversely affect our future prospects and may cause the company to fail.

Our business plan depends, in part, on access to public clouds through major cloud providers and there is no guarantee that access will be available on reasonable terms.

Our quantum computing application development solutions will permit deployment of our software in various scenarios, including on the premises of a customer, hybrid clouds controlled by the customer, or a public cloud controlled by us. Although not necessary in all customer engagements, an important aspect of business plan is to make our quantum computing application development solutions available via a public cloud controlled by us. To accomplish this, we are required to negotiate cloud access with one or more cloud providers. Multiple large public cloud providers, such as Google and Microsoft, are both engaged in their own initiatives that could compete with our quantum computing application development solutions in whole or in part. There is a risk that a cloud provider important to our business plan could use control of their public cloud to deny or place us at a competitive disadvantage by various means, including embedding innovations or privileged interoperating capabilities in products competing with ours, bundling competing products, requiring unfavorable pricing, including terms or conditions or regulatory requirements that make our quantum computing application development solutions uncompetitive, or leveraging their existing relationships with our customers to pressure customers to use their products rather than ours. Further, if we fail to comply with requirements of these third parties, we could be denied access to a critical platform, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

There can be no guarantee that we will be able to deploy our quantum computing application development solutions on public clouds controlled by competitors. The failure to be able to access public clouds, or the imposition of restrictive terms as a condition to such access, limit the adoption and use of our quantum computing application development solutions by customers, increase our operating expenses, damage our brand, and/or place us at a disadvantage when competing for customer accounts. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, market share, and profitability.

Our business plan depends, in part, on access to quantum processing units (QPUs), high-performance classical compute resources, and other specialized hardware either directly through the purchase of computing hardware and installation in data centers, or through third party providers. There is no guarantee that access through either path will be available on reasonable terms, or at all.

Many of the techniques developed by us require the use of specialized hardware to execute an algorithm in a time or cost-efficient manner as required by the constraints of an application. Access to this hardware can be obtained through the purchase of quantum or hybrid computing systems and installation in a data center or on-premise, or through a third-party infrastructure service provider. Hardware could be purchased or accessed from providers such as IBM, IonQ, D-Wave, Rigetti or NVIDIA. Many of these providers are also our competitors in that they operate in the quantum software space in addition to hardware. Supply chain problems, chip shortages, or regulatory or geopolitical conditions beyond our control including tariffs or trade restrictions could all impact our ability to access this hardware, either directly or through a third-party provider, and/or the prices we must pay for the hardware. Additionally, obtaining space in an existing facility and maintaining the hardware would require additional expertise that would need to be either hired or contracted by us, and identifying and hiring such experts could be costly and time-consuming. We could also face difficulties securing terms to host this hardware on reasonable terms, or at all, and we may be forced to incur substantial additional or unforeseen expenses to navigate these challenges.

Alternatively, instead of competing to purchase hardware directly, we could rent time on that hardware from classical or quantum cloud infrastructure service providers, such as Amazon AWS, Amazon Braket, Oracle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, or IBM Quantum. In this case, we would rely on third-party providers to provide cloud-based network access to these systems on an hourly, subscription, or other basis. However, there can be no assurance that these third-party providers could obtain or maintain access to quantum hardware on reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to access on favorable terms the necessary hardware to operate our business as needed to establish, sustain or grow our operations as planned, it will have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents or our patent rights may be contested, circumvented, invalidated or limited in scope, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from interfering with our commercialization of our products.

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours. The status of patents involves complex legal and factual questions and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. As a result, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we file will result in patents being issued, or that our patents and any patents that may be issued to us will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. Numerous patents and pending patent applications owned by others exist relating to quantum computing, quantum inspired classical methods, algorithms and software, differential equations and optimization, and hardware optimization. In addition to those who may have patents or patent applications directed to relevant technology with an effective filing date earlier than any of our existing patents or pending patent applications, any of our existing or pending patents may also be challenged by others on the basis that they are otherwise invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, patent applications filed in foreign countries are subject to laws, rules and procedures that differ from those of the United States, and thus we cannot be certain that foreign patent applications related to issued U.S. patents will be issued.

Even if our patent applications succeed and we are issued patents in accordance with them, it is still uncertain whether these patents will be contested, circumvented, invalidated or limited in scope in the future. The rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with meaningful protection or competitive advantages, and some foreign countries provide significantly less effective patent enforcement than in the United States. In addition, the claims under any patents that issue from our patent applications may not be broad enough to prevent others from developing technologies that are similar or that achieve results similar to ours. The intellectual property rights of others could also bar us from licensing and exploiting any patents that issue from our pending applications. In addition, patents issued to us may be infringed upon or designed around by others and others may obtain patents that it needs to license or design around, either of which would increase costs and may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

There is no guarantee that our IP will provide the desired competitive advantage.

We seek to provide ourselves with a competitive advantage by making key elements of our quantum computing application development solutions proprietary, through one of two means. First, we pursue patent protection for some inventions that we believe qualify for protection under the patent laws. In cases in which patent protection is sought, the details of the invention eventually will be made public in the normal course, usually within eighteen months of filing. As to these inventions, competitors will eventually know the details of and can use the inventions to compete with us, unless a patent is granted prohibiting such use and we can learn of violations and effectively enforce our patent rights in light of the costs and complexities involved in such enforcement litigation. Second, some elements of our quantum computing application development solutions we seek to protect as trade secrets. As to our trade secrets, competitors will not be able to know our techniques provided the trade secrets are not improperly disclosed, but if a competitor independently develops the same technique and files for and is granted patent protection we could find ourselves prohibited by the patent laws from practicing our trade secret technology.

There is no assurance that our pending or future patent applications will be granted and provide us patent protection as to the claims in those applications. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that our patent rights will not be violated by competitors, that we will be able to detect such violations, or that if violations are detected we will be in a position effectively to enforce our patent rights. Nor can we guarantee that our trade secrets will remain secret and not be disclosed to competitors either inadvertently or through violation of contractual secrecy agreements, or that our trade secrets are not independently developed by competitors. The failure of our IP strategy to protect key elements of our quantum computing application development solutions could materially reduce any competitive advantage we might otherwise have and have a corresponding adverse effect on our market share and/or profitability.

We may face patent infringement and other intellectual property claims that could be costly to defend, result in injunctions and significant damage awards or other costs (including indemnification of third parties or costly licensing arrangements (if licenses are available at all)) and limit our ability to use certain key technologies in the future or require development of non-infringing products, services, or technologies, which could result in a significant expenditure and otherwise harm our business.

We may become subject to intellectual property disputes. Intellectual property litigation is often extremely expensive and entails high legal fees and costs of expert witnesses.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and commercialize our products, services and technologies without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of third parties. However, we may not be aware that our products, services or technologies are infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating third-party intellectual property rights and such third parties may bring claims alleging such infringement, misappropriation or violation. For example, there may be issued patents of which we are unaware, held by third parties that, if found to be valid and enforceable, could be alleged to be infringed by our current or future products, services or technologies.

There also may be pending patent applications of which we are not aware that may result in issued patents, which could be alleged to be infringed by our current or future products, services or technologies. Because patent applications can take years to issue and are often afforded confidentiality for some period of time, there may currently be pending applications, unknown to us, that later result in issued patents that could cover our current or future products, services or technologies. Lawsuits can be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, and they divert management’s time and attention. Numerous patents and pending patent applications owned by others exist in the fields in which we have developed and are developing our technology. Companies that have developed and are developing technology are often required to defend against litigation claims based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property rights. Our products, services or technologies may not be able to withstand any third-party claims against their use. In addition, many companies have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may be brought against them. In a patent infringement claim against us, we may assert, as a defense, that we do not infringe the relevant patent claims, that the patent is invalid or both. The strength of our defenses will depend on the patents asserted, the interpretation of these patents, and its ability to invalidate the asserted patents. However, we could be unsuccessful in advancing non-infringement and/or invalidity arguments in its defense. In the United States, issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, and the party challenging the validity of a patent claim must present clear and convincing evidence of invalidity, which is a high burden of proof. Conversely, the patent owner need only prove infringement by a preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower burden of proof. Our patent portfolio may not be large enough to deter patent infringement claims, and our competitors and others may now and in the future have significantly larger and more mature patent portfolios. Any litigation may also involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant solution revenue, and therefore, our patent portfolio may provide little or no deterrence as it would not be able to assert its patents against such entities or individuals. If a third party is able to obtain an injunction preventing us from accessing such third-party intellectual property rights, or if we cannot license or develop alternative technology for any infringing aspect of our business, we may be forced to limit or stop sales of its products, services or technologies or cease business activities related to such intellectual property. Although the Company carries general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. We cannot predict the outcome of lawsuits and cannot ensure that the results of any such actions will not have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. Any intellectual property litigation to which we might become a party, or for which it is required to provide indemnification, regardless of the merit of the claim or its defenses, may require us to do one or more of the following:

Even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of its management and harm its business and operating results. Moreover, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our Common Stock. The occurrence of infringement claims may grow as the market for our products, services and technologies grows. Accordingly, our exposure to damages resulting from infringement claims could increase and this could further exhaust its financial and management resources.

Our use of third-party open source software could negatively affect our ability to offer and sell subscriptions to our quantum computing application development solutions and subject us to possible litigation.

A portion of the technologies we use incorporates third-party open source software, and we may incorporate third-party open source software in our solutions in the future. Open source software is generally licensed by its authors or other third parties under open source licenses. From time to time, companies that use third-party open source software have faced claims challenging the use of such open source software and requesting compliance with the open source software license terms. Accordingly, we may be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or claiming non-compliance with the applicable open source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses require end users who use, distribute or make available across a network software and services that include open source software to offer aspects of the technology that incorporates the open source software for no cost. We may also be required to make publicly available source code (which in some circumstances could include valuable proprietary code) for modifications or derivative works we create based upon, incorporating or using the open source software and/or to license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of the particular open source license. Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated open source software into software that we license from such provider, we could be required to disclose any of our source code that incorporates or is a modification of our licensed software. While we employ practices designed to monitor our compliance with the licenses of third-party open source software and protect our valuable proprietary source code, we may inadvertently use third-party open source software in a manner that exposes us to claims of non-compliance with the terms of their licenses, including claims of intellectual property rights infringement or for breach of contract. Furthermore, there exists today an increasing number of types of open source software licenses, almost none of which have been tested in courts of law to provide guidance of their proper legal interpretations. If we were to receive a claim of non-compliance with the terms of any of these open source licenses, we could be required to incur significant legal expenses defending against those allegations and could be subject to significant damages, enjoined from offering or selling our solutions that contained the open source software, and required to comply with the foregoing conditions, and we may be required to publicly release certain portions of our proprietary source code. We could also be required to expend substantial time and resources to re-engineer some of our software. Any of the foregoing could disrupt and harm our business.

In addition, the use of third-party open source software typically exposes us to greater risks than the use of third-party commercial software because open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the functionality or origin of the software. Use of open source software may also present additional security risks because the public availability of such software may make it easier for hackers and other third parties to determine how to compromise our quantum computing application development solutions. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and could help our competitors develop platforms and applications that are similar to or better than ours.

In addition, companies that currently sponsor and maintain open source software may choose to change the terms of their open source software licenses. These license changes could cause us to lose access to upgrades for commercial use that are currently available to us or otherwise restrict the way we are currently using them. These changes could mean that we must invest engineering resources to maintain that library itself, move to a different underlying software library, or engineer a replacement in order to keep the same feature set in its offerings.

Because of the characteristics of open source software, there may be fewer technology barriers to entry by new competitors and it may be relatively easy for new and existing competitors with greater resources than we have to compete with us.

One of the characteristics of open source software is that the governing license terms generally allow liberal modifications of the code and distribution thereof to a wide group of companies and/or individuals. As a result, others could easily develop new platforms and applications based upon those open source programs that compete with existing open source software that we support and incorporate into our quantum computing application development solutions. Such competition with use of the open source projects that we utilize can materialize without the same degree of overhead and lead time required by us, particularly if the customers do not value the differentiation of our proprietary components. It is possible for new and existing competitors with greater resources than ours to develop their own open source software or hybrid proprietary and open source software offerings, potentially reducing the demand for, and putting price pressure on, our quantum computing application development solutions. In addition, some competitors make open source software available for free download and use or may position competing open source software as a loss leader. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive pressure and/or the availability of open source software will not result in price reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share, any one of which could seriously harm our business.

If open source software programmers, many of whom we do not employ, or our own internal programmers do not continue to develop and enhance open source technologies, we may be unable to develop new technologies, adequately enhance our existing technologies or meet customer requirements for innovation, quality and price.

We rely to a significant degree on a number of open source software programmers, or committers and contributors, to develop and enhance components of our quantum computing application development solutions. Additionally, members of the corresponding Apache Software Foundation Project Management Committees (“PMCs”), many of whom are not employed by us, are primarily responsible for the oversight and evolution of the codebases of important components of the open source data management ecosystem. If the open source data management committees and contributors fail to adequately further develop and enhance open source technologies, or if the PMCs fail to oversee and guide the evolution of open source data management technologies in the manner that we believe is appropriate to maximize the market potential of our solutions, then we would have to rely on other parties, or we would need to expend additional resources, to develop and enhance our quantum computing application development solutions. We also must devote adequate resources to our own internal programmers to support their continued development and enhancement of open source technologies, and if we do not do so, we may have to turn to third parties or experience delays in developing or enhancing open source technologies. We cannot predict whether further developments and enhancements to these technologies would be available from reliable alternative sources. In either event, we may incur additional development expenses and experience delays in technology release and upgrade. Delays in developing, completing, or delivering new or enhanced components to our quantum computing application development solutions could cause our offerings to be less competitive, impair customer acceptance of our solutions, and result in delayed or reduced revenue for our solutions.

Risks Related to Government Regulation and Litigation

If we fail to comply with United States and foreign laws related to privacy, data security, and data protection, it could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We, either directly or through our customers, collaborators or end-users of our products, are or may become subject to a variety of laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, and data security. This includes the European Union’s (“EU”) General Data Protection Regulation (the “EU GDPR”) and the United Kingdom’s General Data Protection Regulations (the “UK GDPR”). Other countries where we may seek to do business also may have data privacy laws we will be required to comply with. These laws and regulations are continuously evolving and developing. The scope and interpretation of the laws that are or may be applicable to us are often uncertain and may be conflicting, particularly with respect to foreign laws. The application of these laws and regulations can arise from our e-commerce platform, social media activities, drone technology and applications, relationships with third parties and their operations, or from other activities we undertake now or that we may undertake in the future. Data privacy and protection regulations are frequently broad in terms of scope of the information protected, activities affected, and geographic reach.

In particular, there are numerous United States federal, state, and local laws and regulations and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy and the collection, sharing, use, processing, disclosure, and protection of personal data. Such laws and regulations often vary in scope, may be subject to differing interpretations, and may be inconsistent among different jurisdictions. For example, the GDPR includes operational requirements for companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the EU that are broader and more stringent than those previously in place in the EU and in most other jurisdictions around the world. The GDPR includes significant penalties for non-compliance, including fines of up to €20 million or 4% of total worldwide revenue. Additionally, in June 2018, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”). The CCPA requires covered companies to provide California consumers with new disclosures and will expand the rights afforded consumers regarding their data. Fines for noncompliance may be up to $7,500 per violation. In September 2025, California amended the CCPA to (i) regulate technologies that replace or substantially replace human decisions, (ii) require comprehensive risk assessment reports that address specific processing activities that present a significant risk to a consumer’s privacy, and (iii) clarify when a cyber security audit must be conducted. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the GDPR, CCPA, and similar laws may limit the use and adoption of our products and services and/or require us to incur substantial compliance costs, which could have an adverse impact on our business.

Since the CCPA was enacted, the United States currently has at least 20 states – California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia, that have comprehensive data privacy laws in place, or enacted comprehensive data privacy laws set to soon take effect. An additional seven states have enacted narrower privacy laws – Florida, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New York, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. During the 2025 legislative cycle, comprehensive federal privacy reform was not prevalent in state legislatures, but at least eight states with existing privacy statutes expanded the scope of their privacy frameworks, including Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, Texas, Oregon, Montana, and Kentucky. However, this patchwork approach to privacy legislation could pose compliance and liability risks for companies that have multistate operations. Proposed and enacted bills in various states have similar rights in preexisting privacy legislation but differ in implementation and enforcement. In June 2024, the American Privacy Rights Act of 2024 was introduced in the United States House of Representatives and was subsequently referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce has and is not yet adopted. As of November 2025, the House Energy & Commerce Committee has convened a Privacy Working Group to solicit comments from stakeholders on the legislation. As introduced, this proposed legislation would establish requirements for how companies handle personal data by, among other things, limiting the collection, processing, and transfer of personal data, prohibiting companies from transferring individuals’ personal data without their affirmative express consent, establishing a right to access, correct, and delete personal data, requiring companies to provide individuals with a means to “opt out” of the transfer of non-sensitive covered data and the right to opt out of the user of their personal information for targeted advertising, requiring companies to implement security practices aimed at protecting personal data, and imposing enforcement actions and the possibility of civil proceedings for violations. Proposed federal legislation, will likely continue to be debated and, at some point, may be enacted in some form.

We intend to strive to comply with all applicable laws, policies, legal obligations, and industry codes of conduct relating to privacy, data security, and data protection. Our limited resources may adversely affect our compliance effort. Given that the scope, interpretation, and application of these laws and regulations are often uncertain and may be in conflict across jurisdictions, it is possible that these obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules or our practices. Any failure or perceived failure by us, customers, or third-party vendors or end-users involved with our products to comply with our privacy or security policies or privacy-related legal obligations, or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personal data, may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation, or negative publicity, and could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Governments are continuing to focus on privacy and data security, and it is possible that new privacy or data security laws will be passed or existing laws will be amended in a way that is material to our business. Any significant change to applicable laws, regulations, or industry practices regarding the personal data of our employees, agents or customers could require us to modify our practices and may limit our ability to expand or sustain our salesforce or bring our products to market. Changes to applicable laws and regulations in this area could subject us to additional regulation and oversight, any of which could significantly increase our operating costs and materially affect our operating results and financial condition.

Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations, industry standards and other obligations may govern privacy, data protection and security. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“EU GDPR”), the United Kingdom’s General Data Protection Regulation (“UK GDPR”), Brazil’s General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or “LGPD”) (Law No. 13,709/2018), and China’s Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) impose strict requirements for processing personal data.

For example, under the EU GDPR, companies may face temporary or definitive bans on data processing and other corrective actions; fines of up to 20 million Euros or 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater; or private litigation related to processing of personal data brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests. Additionally, we also target customers in Asia and may be subject to new and emerging data protection and privacy regimes in Asia, including China’s PIPL, Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information, and Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Act.

In addition to privacy, data protection and security laws, we may become subject to contractually mandated standards and/or industry standards adopted by industry groups, as well as other potential obligations related to privacy, data protection and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful.

Obligations related to privacy, data protection and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources and may necessitate changes to our services, information technologies, systems, and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal data on our behalf.

We may at times fail, or be perceived to have failed, in our efforts to comply with our privacy, data protection or security obligations. Moreover, despite our efforts, our personnel or third parties on whom we rely may fail, or be perceived to have failed, to comply with such obligations, which could negatively impact our business operations. If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with applicable privacy, data protection or security obligations, we could face significant consequences, including but not limited to: government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar events); litigation (including class-action claims); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal data; and orders to destroy or not use personal data. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations or data collection; limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or substantial changes to our business model or operations.

Compliance with data use, privacy, and security laws will be an inherent feature in our product design and a change in those laws could negatively affect the value of our quantum computing application development solutions.

We seek to provide quantum computing application development solutions to large enterprise users located anywhere in the world. We anticipate that the data required to be processed by such solutions can be located in different jurisdictions, subject to different and changing data laws. We also anticipate that our future enterprise customers may have their own policies with respect to the manner in which the data they maintain can be handled, stored, and used. Our quantum computing application development solutions are and will continue to be designed to permit compliance with any applicable data laws or internal IT policy of enterprise customers.

There can be no assurance, however, that our software product design is adequate to permit the deployment of our quantum computing application development solutions in compliance with existing data laws or customer policies or that these laws and/or policies will not change in the future in a way that makes deployment of our solutions impossible or more costly. A failure on our part to design and re-design our software platform to permit compliance with applicable data laws and customer policies could limit our sales, harming our growth and profitability, or in the worst case create substantial contract liability to a customer for causing a breach of applicable data laws with respect to the customer’s data.

We are potentially subject to governmental export and import control laws that could negatively impact our business.

As are all U.S.-based businesses, we are subject to various U.S. laws prohibiting the export of certain goods and services and imposing certain trade sanctions. Presently, quantum software including quantum inspired techniques and AI software are not generally subject to the U.S. export control regime but could be subject to those controls depending on the specific application the software would be used to address. Moreover, the list of goods and services subject to the U.S. export control regime is expected to change and grow in the future to include additional items relating to quantum computing. These laws might limit our ability to sell our quantum computing application development solutions to customers.

In addition, under the “deemed export” rules, to the extent the export control laws prohibit a sale of certain technology to non-U.S. customers the laws also prohibit disclosure of that technology to non-U.S. persons. Our workforce is global and includes non-U.S. employees. A prohibition on disclosure of certain of our technology to such employees could be disruptive to our business and cause delays and additional expense in developing, selling, and supporting our quantum computing application development solutions.

There can be no assurance that our efforts to comply with current and future export control laws will be successful and the failure to do so could result in significant expense associated with governmental investigation and/or enforcement action. There also can be no assurance that the export control laws or changes to those laws will not limit our ability to sell our quantum computing application development solutions or affect our internal operations in a way that causes a material adverse impact on our financial condition or profitability.

We are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption, anti-bribery, and similar laws, the violation of which can lead to substantial harm to our business.

We are subject to various anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws in the U.S., including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and the U.S. domestic bribery laws, the U.K. Bribery Act, and other anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities. Such laws prohibit companies, their employees, and their third-party agents and representatives from authorizing, promising, offering, soliciting, or accepting, directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to or form any person whether in the public or private sector. Awareness of and compliance with these laws is of particular concern to us, because we are and intend in the future to be doing business with both U.S. and foreign entities, some of which are affiliates of the U.S. or foreign governments. In addition, our business is likely to require us to seek governmental approvals from time to time. Detecting, investigating, and resolving any actual or alleged violations of these laws can be expensive and time-consuming.

There can be no assurance that our efforts to comply with these laws will be successful and a failure to comply, whether such failure results from the actions of our own employees or a third-party representing us, could result in costly internal or outside investigations, whistleblower complaints, governmental investigations and enforcement actions, substantial financial settlements, fines or other criminal penalties, injunctions or other bans limiting our ability to do business, reputational harm, and other collateral consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and the value of our Common Stock.

To the extent we have customers outside the United States, we may be subject to increased business and economic risks that could harm our business.

We have in the past and may in the future have customers and business development activities in countries outside of North America, including Asia (e.g., Japan and Singapore) and Europe (e.g., the United Kingdom, Spain and Denmark). Subject to cash availability, we plan to include international markets in addition to prospective U.S.-based customers in our marketing efforts. Any new markets or countries into which we attempt to sell our quantum computing application development solutions may not be receptive. For example, we may not be able to expand further in some markets if we are not able to satisfy certain government-and industry-specific requirements. In addition, our ability to manage our business and conduct our operations internationally in the future may require considerable management attention and resources and is subject to the particular challenges of supporting an early stage company with limited resources in an environment of multiple languages, cultures, customs, legal and regulatory systems, alternative dispute systems, and commercial markets. Future international expansion will require investment of significant funds and other resources. Operating internationally subjects us to new risks and may increase risks that we currently face, including risks associated with:

Compliance with laws and regulations applicable to our global operations substantially increases our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions. We may be unable to keep current with changes in laws and regulations as they occur. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to support compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that we will always maintain compliance or that all of our employees, contractors, partners, and agents will comply. Any violations could result in enforcement actions, fines, civil and criminal penalties, damages, injunctions, or reputational harm. If we are unable to comply with these laws and regulations or manage the complexity of our global operations successfully, we may need to relocate or cease operations in certain foreign jurisdictions.

We are exposed to risks associated with litigation, investigations, and regulatory proceedings.

We may in the future face legal, administrative, regulatory, and/or criminal proceedings that are based on a variety of individual or governmental complaints against us, including by way of example: shareholder direct or derivative actions alleging violations of the securities laws by the company or breach of fiduciary duty by our directors; challenges to our IP brought by competitors; breach of contract claims asserted by customers; employee lawsuits asserting violation of various employment or whistleblower laws; or governmental actions based on alleged violations of securities, tax, anti-trust, export control, data privacy, or other applicable laws. Litigation and regulatory proceedings are inherently uncertain, but in nearly every instance are time-consuming, expensive, and cause reputational damage. The potential outcomes can include substantial monetary awards, limitations on our ability to do business, or criminal liability on the part of the company and/or some of its officers, directors, or employees. In some instances, it may not be possible to obtain insurance against specific risks. Even when insurance is available, we may not have purchased such insurance either by oversight or by a conscious decision that the cost of the insurance did not justify its purchase. We also cannot guarantee that our existing insurance coverage and coverage for errors and omissions will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that our insurers will not deny coverage as to any future claim.

In addition, we may conclude in the future to bring a legal action against a customer or competitor, for example to recover damages caused to us. Such litigation can be lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive and the outcome is uncertain. Because of these considerations, such litigation is often settled for an amount materially less than the actual damage caused.

There can be no assurance that we will not be subject of litigation, investigations, and/or regulatory proceedings which, whether singly or cumulatively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or ability to do business. Nor can there be any assurance that we will prevail in any litigation brought by us or even if we do prevail that an award or settlement will timely or adequately compensate us for the losses the litigation sought to recover.

Risks Outside Our Specific Business

Our business relies on computer systems which are vulnerable to attack and/or failure.

As is the case with nearly every business, we rely on computers and computer networks, both public and private, to perform most of the actions required for us to do business, including internal and external communications, development of our software and IP, storage of our business and financial records, and deployment of our quantum computing application development solutions. Such computer systems are inherently susceptible to unintentional failures as well as various forms of cyber-attack, including denial of service attacks, ransomware attacks, email hacking and phishing, computer malware and viruses, and social engineering attacks. Like other companies, we may also be the subject of unauthorized access resulting from employee misconduct. These risks are potentially greater for us because the nature of our business provides an additional incentive for bad actors, including foreign nation states and domestic and foreign businesses, to attack our systems for the purpose of gaining information about generative AI, quantum computing and quantum algorithms, the development of which currently is a priority for many businesses and countries.

Our Orquestra platform is built to be accessed through third-party public cloud providers such as AWS and Azure. These providers may also experience breaches and attacks to their products which may impact our systems. Data security breaches may also result from non-technical means, such as actions by an employee with access to our systems. While we and our third-party cloud providers have implemented security measures designed to protect against security breaches, these measures could fail or may be insufficient, resulting in the unauthorized disclosure, modification, misuse, destruction, or loss of sensitive or confidential information.

Any of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security incident or other interruption that could result in unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive information, or our technology systems, or those of the third parties upon whom we rely. A security incident or other interruption could disrupt our ability (and that of third parties upon whom we rely) to provide our platform or other software. Any actual or potential security breach of our software, our operational systems, our physical facilities, or the systems or facilities of our vendors, or the perception that one has occurred, could result in adverse consequences, such as litigation, indemnity obligations, regulatory enforcement actions, investigations, fines, penalties, mitigation and remediation costs, disputes, reputational harm, diversion of management’s attention, and other liabilities and damage to our business. Even though we do not control the security measures of third parties, we may be perceived or asserted to be responsible for any breach of such measures or suffer reputational harm even where we do not have recourse to the third party that caused the breach. In addition, any failure by our vendors to comply with applicable law or regulations could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others, with further financial, operational, and reputational damage.

The costs to respond to a security breach and/or to mitigate any security vulnerabilities that may be identified could be significant, our efforts to address these problems may not be successful, and these problems could result in unexpected interruptions, delays, cessation of service, negative publicity, and other harm to our business and our competitive position. We could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices in response to a security breach or related regulatory actions or litigation, which could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, laws, regulations, government guidance, and industry standards and practices in the United States and elsewhere are rapidly evolving to combat these threats. We may face increased compliance burdens regarding such requirements from regulators and customers regarding our products and services and also incur additional costs for oversight and monitoring of security risks relating to our own services. Most jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals, regulatory authorities, and others of security breaches involving certain types of data. In addition, our agreements with certain customers and partners may require us to notify them in the event of a security breach involving customer or partner data on our systems. Such mandatory disclosures are costly, could lead to negative publicity, may cause our customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures, and require us to expend significant capital and other resources to respond to or alleviate problems caused by the actual or perceived security breach may cause us to breach customer contracts.

If we (or a third party upon whom we rely) experience a security incident or are perceived to have experienced a security incident, we may experience adverse consequences such as government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing sensitive information; litigation (including class claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions; interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. Litigation resulting from security breaches may adversely affect our business. Unauthorized access to our software, systems, networks, or physical facilities could result in litigation with our customers or other relevant stakeholders. These proceedings could force us to spend money in defense or settlement, divert management’s time and attention, increase our costs of doing business, or adversely affect our reputation. We could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our software capabilities in response to such litigation, which could have an adverse effect on our business. If a security breach were to occur, and the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our data or the data of our partners or our customers was disrupted, we could incur significant liability, or our software, systems, or networks may be perceived as less desirable, which could negatively affect our business and damage our reputation.

We may not have adequate insurance coverage for security incidents or breaches, including fines, judgments, settlements, penalties, costs, attorney fees and other impacts that arise out of incidents or breaches. Depending on the facts and circumstances of such an incident, the damages, penalties and costs could be significant and may not be covered by insurance or could exceed our applicable insurance coverage limits. If the impacts of a security incident or breach, or the successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds our available insurance coverage, or results in changes to our insurance policies (including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements), it could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, we cannot be sure that our existing insurance coverage and coverage for errors and omissions will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that our insurers will not deny coverage as to all or part of any future claim or loss. Our risks are likely to increase as we grow our customer base, and store, transmit, and otherwise process increasingly large amounts of proprietary and sensitive data. There can be no assurance that we can successfully prevent such occurrences, which could damage our reputation and/or result in the theft our important IP, either of which could damage our business prospects and future profitability.

Widespread damage to the U.S. or global economy and/or our industry would likely adversely affect our business.

The U.S. economy and the global economy as a whole is susceptible to conditions unrelated to us or the computing industry, including the possibility of an economic recession or depression, international trade wars, the imposition of tariffs on our products or third parties’ products on which we rely, political unrest, natural catastrophes, climate change, terrorism, wars between nation states, or other matters that could have a general widespread negative impact on global commerce. In recent times, central bank interest rates, a deteriorating labor market, tariffs and trade tensions and geopolitical hostilities and elevated stock price valuations, have contributed to a growing rhetoric that a recession in the U.S. or abroad could be imminent. Any such condition or development could affect our business in one or more of a variety of ways, including reducing or eliminating the availability of capital at a time when we require such capital, denying us the ability to sell our quantum computing application development solutions in certain countries around the world, restricting our ability to hire qualified employees needed to effectuate our business plan, diminishing our ability to obtain customers, causing customers to reduce or eliminate their expenditures on quantum techniques enhanced software or generative AI computing, and/or preventing customers from paying amounts owed to us.

Further, many market analysts and other stakeholders have voiced growing concerns that the technology sector, including AI and quantum-focused businesses, are currently in a stock market “bubble” characterized by extreme valuations and unsustainable stock price growth over the past few years. If these views prove to be correct, or if the public begins to perceive such concerns as valid, it could result in a severe market correction or downturn, which could materially adversely affect us, including by limiting or preventing us from raising capital and by diminishing our customer base and market for our products and services.

Damage to the global economy could materially harm our business and if we are unable to persevere through such adverse conditions could cause us to fail.

Risks Relating to Ownership of our Common Stock

Because of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion and exercise of outstanding securities, holders of our Common Stock will experience substantial future dilution and downward price pressure on our Common Stock.

There are 162,580,506 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the date of filing of this Report. We will be obligated to issue all or very many of the following shares of common stock which will dilute our current stockholders: (1) 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible promissory notes, (2) 63,749,982 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, (4) 25,983,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, and (5) 38,503,451 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options. In addition, we expect to issue additional securities in the near future in order to raise capital and to hire and retain personnel. Of the securities described above, 67,507,667 shares of Common Stock are subject certain Universal Resale and Registration Provisions (the “Resale Provisions”) pursuant to which such recipients agreed to certain lock-up provisions restricting and limiting their sale, transfer, pledge, or disposal of any shares of common stock held by or issuable to such recipients for a period ending 12 months following the date of a resale registration statement with respect to the common stock comprising or underlying such securities is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (such period, the “Lock-Up Period”). The Resale Provisions provide that up to 10% of each holder’s shares may be sold or transferred during the first 90 days following such effective date, and up to 25% of such holder’s shares may be sold or transferred in each subsequent 90 day period thereafter for the remainder of the Lock-Up Period; and that during each of the third and fourth ninety 90 day periods referred to above, each holder may sell or transfer up to an additional 10% of its shares, but only to the extent such amount represents shares that were eligible for sale or transfer in prior periods but were not sold or transferred by such holder. The Resale Provisions also contains certain additional limitations and exceptions with respect to such lock-up provisions, including a volume limitation on the holders’ sales of shares pursuant to which the holders collectively may not sell more than 10% of the shares in a given trading day, and the cessation of the Lock-Up Period and termination of such lock-up provisions if certain events do not occur within a specified time and as more particularly set forth therein. Pursuant to the Resale Provisions the Company also agreed to provide the holders with registration rights pursuant to which, if the Company closes a securities offering resulting in gross proceeds of at least $5 million, the holders shall have “piggy back” registration rights for the inclusion for resale of their shares to be registered on any subsequent registration statement filed with the SEC in connection with such offering. The Company also agreed to file a registration statement for the holders’ sales of shares within 180 days after the Company makes the requisite filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and prepares the requisite audited and unaudited financial statements, as applicable, to become eligible to file a resale registration statement, and to cause such registration statement to be declared effective within 90 days thereafter. The Company also agreed to provide the holders with certain indemnification rights in connection with such registration rights.

Based on our capital structure and anticipated capital raising and other transactions as described above, the issuance of the shares of Common Stock pursuant to the outstanding derivative securities and anticipated transactions, many of which are expected to occur in the near term, will cause significant dilution to the Company’s other investors whereby their respective percentage ownership in our Company will experience a drastic decline. As a result, the voting rights, dividend rights, and other perceived benefits of holding our Common Stock will be diluted due to the new stockholders. Further, a majority of the newly issued shares will be freely tradeable because the transactions are subject to registration rights, so the per-share price of our Common Stock could decline, which decline could be dramatic and long-term or permanent.

In the future, we expect to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our capital stock or offering debt (subject to the limitations under the existing agreements) or other equity securities, including senior or subordinated notes, debt securities convertible into equity, or shares of preferred stock. Issuing additional shares of capital stock, other equity securities, or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our then-existing stockholders, reduce the market price of our Common Stock, or both. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion. Preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our Common Stock. Our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond its control, which may adversely affect the amount, timing, or nature of its future offerings. As a result, holders of our Common Stock bear the risk that our future offerings may reduce the market price of our Common Stock and dilute their percentage ownership.

The market price of our shares of Common Stock is subject to volatility.

The market price of our Common Stock has been and may continue to be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our Common Stock include the following:

In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

There is currently a limited trading market for the Company’s Common Stock.

Because we are delinquent in our SEC reports, our Common Stock is currently quoted on the OTC Expert Market under the symbol “ZPTA.” Quotation on the Expert Market means our Common Stock is not eligible for proprietary broker-dealer quotations, all quotes in this stock reflect unsolicited customer orders, and Unsolicited-Only stocks have a higher risk of wider spreads, increased volatility, and price dislocations. Investors may therefore have difficulty selling this stock. An initial review by a broker-dealer under SEC Rule15c2-11 is required for brokers to publish competing quotes and provide continuous market making. While we expect the filing of past-due periodic reports including this Report will enable us to become instead quoted on the OTC Basic Market in the near future, even when that occurs there will be a limited trading market in our Common Stock, and we cannot assure you that a consistent, active trading market will develop. Trading on the OTC Basic Market is less liquid than the leading national securities exchanges and higher tier OTC markets. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable.

Our Common Stock is a “penny stock” and thereby be subject to additional sale and trading regulations that may depress the price of our common stock.

Our Common Stock is a “penny stock” if it does not qualify for one of the exemptions from the definition of “penny stock” under Section 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. Our Common Stock may be a “penny stock” if it meets one or more of the following conditions: (i) it trades at a price less than $5 per share; (ii) it is not traded on a “recognized” national securities exchange which excludes OTC Markets; or (iii) is issued by a company that has been in business less than three years with net tangible assets less than $5 million. Thus, our Common Stock is a penny stock.

The principal result or effect of being designated a penny stock is that securities broker-dealers participating in sales of our Common Stock are discouraged from soliciting purchases of our Common Stock by the SEC’s rules which generally results in low prices and limited trading volume. For example, SEC Rule 15g-2 requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document at least two business days before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to: (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult and time consuming for holders of our Common Stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them in the market or otherwise. In addition, clearing firms, which hold retail accounts dislike penny stocks and through extra compliance efforts and costs they impose, make it hard to sell penny stocks.

As a former shell company, we face certain disadvantages relative to other companies, including ineligibility for certain forms and rules for extended periods.

Until 2024, we were a special purpose acquisition company which is a form of shell company under the rules of the SEC. Shell companies are more highly regulated than non-shell operating companies and face certain restrictions on their activities under federal securities laws. However, companies that were formerly shell companies continue to face disadvantages under SEC rules, including (a) limitations on its stockholders to receive unrestricted stock certificates and use the Rule 144 exemption, (b) the inability to qualify as a “well-known seasoned issuer” and file automatically effective registration statements for three years after ceasing to be a shell company, (c) the inability to “incorporate by reference” information in certain registration statements filed under the Securities Act for a period of three years after ceasing to be a shell company, (d) the inability to use most free writing prospectuses until at least three years after a qualifying business combination, and (e) exclusion from certain safe harbors for offering-related communications under the Securities Act for three years after ceasing to be a shell company, including for research reports and certain communications in connection with business combinations. For more information about Rule 144 and its potential impact on our stockholders, please see the section titled “Securities Act Restrictions on Resale of Common Stock” in this prospectus. We expect that these disadvantages will make it more challenging and expensive, and create greater risks and delays, for us and our stockholders to offer securities. These challenges may make our securities less attractive than those of companies that are not former shell companies and may raise our relative cost of capital.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of our Common Stock, the market price and trading volume of our Common Stock could decline.

The trading market for our Common Stock will rely, in part, on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We have limited research coverage by industry or financial analysts. If no, or few, additional analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price of our Common Stock would likely decrease. If one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of our Common Stock, the price of our Common Stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our Common Stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our Common Stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

We will incur significant increased costs as a result of being a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that Legacy Zapata did not incur as a private company. These expenses may increase even more after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time and incur significant expense in connection with compliance initiatives. For example, we will need to implement additional internal controls, both generally and to address the material weaknesses discussed in “Risks Related to Zapata’s Financial Condition and Status as an Early Stage Company,” and disclosure controls and procedures, retain a transfer agent and adopt an insider trading policy. As a public company, we bear all of the internal and external costs of preparing and distributing periodic public reports in compliance with our obligations under the securities laws.

In addition, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the related rules and regulations implemented by the SEC, have increased legal and financial compliance costs and will make some compliance activities more time-consuming. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment will result in increased general and administrative expenses and may divert management’s time and attention from our other business activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and we could be subject to the delisting of our Common Stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action, which may be harmful to its business. In the future, it may be more expensive or more difficult for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board, particularly to serve on its audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

Due to our size, we have a limited management team, which has limited experience in operating a public company.

We presently only have one executive officer, who acts as both our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and has limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company. Until we are able to raise the capital to broaden our management, we may be handicapped in managing our business and our public company obligations. Executives’ limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage as they will likely need to devote an increasing amount of their time to these activities, resulting in less time being devoted to our management and growth. We may not have adequate personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience, and training in the accounting policies, practices or internal controls over financial reporting required of public companies.

We do not currently intend to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock, so any returns will be substantially limited to the value of our Common Stock.

We have no current plans to pay any cash dividends on our Common Stock. The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends on shares of our Common Stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of its business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends from future earnings for the foreseeable future. In addition, our ability to pay dividends may be limited by covenants under indebtedness that we or our subsidiaries may incur in the future, as well as other limitations and restrictions imposed by law. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our Common Stock unless you sell our Common Stock at a greater price than that which you paid for it.

Our Certificate of Incorporation designates a state or federal court located within the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain disputes between our stockholders and us, and also provides that the federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, each of which could limit our stockholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, stockholders, or employees.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that, unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any internal or intra-corporate claim or any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, including, but not limited to, (i) any derivative action brought by a stockholder on our behalf, (ii) any claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, stockholders, or employees and (iii) any claim against us arising under our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws or the DGCL. The Certificate of Incorporation designates the United States District Court for the District of Delaware as the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

This exclusive forum provision will not apply to claims under the Exchange Act, but will apply to other state and federal law claims including actions arising under the Securities Act. Section 22 of the Securities Act, however, created concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a forum selection provision as written in connection with claims arising under the Securities Act.

This choice of forum provision may have the effect of increasing costs for investors to bring a claim against us and our directors and officers and of limiting a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, which may discourage (but not prevent) lawsuits with respect to such claims.

Delaware law and provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Common Stock.

Our status as a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the DGCL may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder without the approval of holders of two-thirds of the voting power of our stockholders other than the interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of the Company more difficult, including the following:

These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay, or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing or to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire, any of which, under certain circumstances, could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of Common Stock.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and a “smaller reporting company,” and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of over $1.235 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of such year and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Stock less attractive if we choose to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result of any choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.

Further, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies and will be able to take advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as the market value of our voting and any non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenue is less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our voting and any non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates was less than $700 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Item 2. Properties

None.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation that arises through the normal course of business. As of the date of this filing, we are not aware of any material legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or to which any of our property is subject, nor are we aware of any such threatened or pending litigation or any such proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities. We are not aware of any material proceedings in which any of our directors, officers, or affiliates or any registered or beneficial stockholder of more than 5% of our common stock, or any associate of any of the foregoing, is a party adverse to or has a material interest adverse to, us or any of our subsidiaries.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our Common Stock is not listed on any securities exchange, and is quoted on the OTC Expert Market under the symbol “ZPTA.” Because our Common Stock is not listed on a securities exchange and its quotations on OTC Expert Market are limited and sporadic, there is currently no established public trading market for our Common Stock.

Holders

As of November 30, 2025, there were approximately 115 shareholders of record of the Company's Common Stock. We believe that additional beneficial owners of our common stock hold shares in street name.

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

All of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company are restricted securities and cannot be sold under Rule 144 until at least six months have passed since payment, and the other requirements of Rule 144(i)(1)(ii) have been satisfied, including the Company being current in its SEC periodic reporting obligations.

In general, Rule 144 provides that any non-affiliate of the Company, who has held restricted common stock for at least six-months, is entitled to sell their restricted stock freely, provided that the Company stays current in its SEC filings.

An officer, director or other person in control of the Company may sell after six months with the following restrictions: (i) the Company is current in its SEC filings, (ii) certain manner of sale provisions, (iii) the filing of a Form 144, and (iv) volume limitations limiting the sale of shares within any three-month period to a number of shares that does not exceed 1% of the total number of outstanding shares. A person who has ceased to be an affiliate at least three months immediately preceding the applicable sale and who has owned such shares of common stock for at least one year may sell the shares under Rule 144 without regard to any of the limitations described above.

Such shares may be sold outside of the United States. Further, such shares may be sold to purchasers in the United States under Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act if paid for more than two years ago and if the seller is not an affiliate of the Company. However, some broker-dealers and transfer agents will not accept legal opinion relying on Section 4(a)(1). 

Dividend Policy

We have not paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not plan to pay such dividends in the foreseeable future. Our Board of Directors will determine our future dividend policy on the basis of many factors, including results of operations, capital requirements, and general business conditions.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

All unregistered sales of equity securities through the period covered by this Report have previously been disclosed.

Item 6. [Reserved]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should read the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which describe factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis. For periods prior to the closing of the Merger (as defined below), the use of “our,” “we”, the “Company” and words of similar import in this Item 7 refer to Zapata Quantum, Inc. (“Zapata”, or “Legacy Zapata”) or Andretti Acquisition Corp. (“AAC”), as the context requires.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expectations for prospective future growth, operating results and financial condition, potential future trends and developments within our industry and the U.S. and global economies generally, plans and expectations for our future business plan and capital raising efforts, expectations and plans with respect to our products and services including the potential market for, timing, features, and demand for such products and services, and liquidity and sources of capital. Forward-looking statements are prefaced by words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “intend,” “seem,” “potential,” “appear,” “continue,” “future,” believe,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” and similar words. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements.

Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, the possibility that estimates, projections and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based prove to be incorrect, our ability to raise the necessary capital to re-establish material operations and generate revenue and the terms and timing of any related transactions, central bank interest rates and future interest rate changes, the risks arising from the impact of inflation, tariffs, the deterioration of the labor market of the United States, a recession which may result on the Company’s business, prospective customers, and on the national and global economy, our ability to attract homeowners to our products and services, the potential for regulatory changes impacting quantum computing, artificial intelligence, data privacy and other areas that impact the Company’s business, and the ability of us and third parties on which we depend to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the risk that software and technology infrastructure on which we depend fail to perform as designed or intended, and the risks and uncertainties disclosed under Item 1A – Risk Factors contained in this Report. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this presentation speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Statements regarding the potential combination and expectations regarding the combined business are “forward looking statements.” In addition, words such as “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “assumes,” “suggests,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “seeks,” “plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “aims,” “intends,” “believes,” “seeks,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “can”, “could,” “future,” “propose,” “target,” “goal,” “objective,” “outlook” and variations of these words or similar expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Generally, statements that are not historical facts, including statements concerning possible or assumed future actions, business strategies, events or results of operations, and any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward- looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, conditions or results, and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors, many of which are outside the control of the parties, that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this report. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

Overview

Zapata Quantum, Inc., formerly known as Zapata Computing Holdings Inc., is a leading pure-play hardware-agnostic quantum software company. Following a strategic realignment in 2025, the Company will deliver subscription-based solutions to efficiently deploy and accelerate the development of quantum and hybrid quantum-classical computing applications. Founded in 2017 by researchers from a Harvard University Quantum Computing Lab, Zapata has built one of the industry’s most robust intellectual property portfolios in quantum and hybrid quantum-classical computing and algorithmic methods, with over 60 patents, granted and pending, developed over eight years.

Recent Developments

2025 Capital Raising and Restructuring Efforts

In late 2024 the Company voluntarily elected to temporarily suspend its operations due to its limited capital resources and inability to access adequate liquidity to continue to fund its operations and meet its outstanding debt obligations. In June 2025, the Company commenced debt restructuring and capital raising transactions and the reinstatement of operations by (1) entering into exchange agreements with unsecured creditors pursuant to which such creditors agreed to exchange outstanding obligations payable to them for common stock and certain rights related thereto, and (2) the Company sold convertible notes and warrants for gross proceeds of $3 million. The Company has since been continuing efforts to negotiate and restructure outstanding obligations and raise capital. In the furtherance of recommencing operations, the Company has also entered into advisory agreements with third parties and agreed to compensate such parties in the form of equity and/or cash compensation. See Note 20, Subsequent Events in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report.

Merger with Andretti Acquisition Corp. (“AAC”)

On March 28, 2024, we completed our planned business combination with AAC, pursuant to which, among other things, Legacy Zapata became a wholly owned subsidiary of AAC (the “Merger”). Immediately prior to the Merger, AAC filed an application for deregistration with the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies, together with the necessary accompanying documents, and filed a certificate of incorporation and a certificate of corporate domestication with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, under which AAC was domesticated and continues as a Delaware corporation (the “Domestication”), changing its name to Zapata Computing Holdings Inc. At the effective time of the Domestication, existing holders of ordinary shares of AAC received 7,596,206 shares of our common stock in exchange for their Class A and Class B ordinary shares held immediately prior to the Domestication.

Upon the closing of the Merger, holders of shares of Legacy Zapata common stock and Legacy Zapata Convertible Preferred Stock received an aggregate of 17,696,425 shares of our common stock, and holders of Legacy Zapata options received options to purchase an aggregate of 3,016,409 shares of our common stock, calculated in accordance with the Business Combination Agreement by and among AAC, Legacy Zapata and Tigre Merger Sub, Inc., entered into on September 6, 2023 (the Business Combination Agreement”), by multiplying each share of Convertible Preferred Stock, Legacy Zapata common stock (including shares underlying options) by 0.9141.

For accounting purposes, the Merger was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization whereby Legacy Zapata was treated as the accounting acquirer and AAC was treated as the acquired company. On April 1, 2024, in connection with the consummation of the Merger, our common stock was listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and our warrants (the “Warrants”) were listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the new trading symbols “ZPTA” and “ZPTAW,” respectively. Costs paid by us that were directly attributable to the Merger were $7.1 million and were treated as issuance costs and netted against additional paid-in-capital in our consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, upon the consummation of the Merger, the holders of certain outstanding senior secured promissory notes issued by Legacy Zapata pursuant to a Senior Secured Note Purchase Agreement (the “Senior Secured Notes”) elected to convert the principal of their notes and accrued interest thereon into 3,257,876 shares of our common stock (856,202 shares to related parties) in accordance with their terms, at a conversion price of $4.50 per share. Aggregate principal and accrued interest of $2.2 million on the Senior Secured Notes remains outstanding as of December 31, 2024.

In connection with the closing of the Merger, the following events occurred as discussed in more detail below:

Unvested Shares

Concurrently with the execution of the Business Combination Agreement, AAC, Legacy Zapata, the Andretti Sponsor LLC (the “Sponsor”), Sol Verano Blocker 1 LLC (the “Sponsor Co-Investor”) and certain key stockholders of the Sponsor entered into a sponsor support agreement. The Sponsor, the Sponsor Co-Investor, key stockholders of the Sponsors and directors owned an aggregate of 5,750,000 Class B ordinary shares of AAC (the “Sponsor Shares”), of which up to 1,423,500 Sponsor Shares were subject to certain vesting and forfeiture provisions as described in the sponsor support agreement. At the closing of the Merger, 1,129,630 Sponsor Shares were determined to be unvested and are subject to forfeiture (the “Unvested Shares”) (see Note 10 in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report).

Forward Purchase Agreement

On March 25, 2024, we entered into a Confirmation of an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction (the “Forward Purchase Agreement”) with Sandia Investment Management LP, acting on behalf of certain funds (collectively, “Sandia” or the “Seller”), pursuant to which Sandia purchased, prior to the closing of the Merger, 1,000,000 shares of AAC’s Class A Ordinary Shares from third parties through a broker in the open market (the “Recycled Shares”) and, concurrently with the closing of the Merger, 500,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $10.99 per share (the “Additional Shares”).

In April 2024, Sandia exercised their optional early termination rights under the Forward Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which 250,000 shares were terminated and we received payments totaling $2.5 million under the early termination obligation prescribed in the Forward Purchase Agreement.

On October 8, 2024, we received notice from Sandia accelerating the Valuation Date to October 8, 2024. As a result, we became obligated to pay Sandia $2.4 million in cash or shares. In June 2025, we settled our obligations under the Forward Purchase Agreement through the issuance of 6,591,000 shares of common stock to Sandia. For additional information, refer to Note 7 in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Advisory Agreements

On July 4, 2023, we entered into an engagement letter with a third party, pursuant to which the third party acted as a capital markets advisor to AAC in connection with the Merger. AAC agreed to pay the third party a fee of (i) $0.5 million in cash payable upon the closing of the Merger, plus (ii) $1.0 million in shares of our common stock, payable 180 days after the closing of the Merger plus (iii) $1.0 million payable in either cash or shares of our common stock, payable 270 calendar days following the completion of the Merger. On March 25, 2024, AAC and the third party entered into an amendment to the engagement letter to settle the fee arrangement, such that there is no remaining payment obligation following the Merger.

On September 13, 2023, we entered into an agreement with an additional third party for advisory services to be provided in connection with the Merger. In March 2024, the payment terms of the agreement were amended to provide for a fee of $1.3 million to be paid by the issuance of a Senior Secured Note with a principal amount of $1.0 million and the remaining $0.3 million in six monthly installments in cash of $42 thousand per month commencing on May 15, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid $0.2 million to the third party.

The Senior Secured Note issued to this third party was a modified award issued subsequent to the initial date of grant. The incremental fair value of the Senior Secured Note immediately preceding the award modification was recorded as a loss on issuance of senior secured notes within total other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Senior Secured Note issued to the third party has the same terms as the Senior Secured Notes issued to other noteholders. The third party did not convert the Senior Secured Note into shares of our common stock upon the Closing of the Merger, and the Senior Secured Note remained outstanding at December 31, 2024.

On February 9, 2024, we entered into a capital markets advisory agreement with a third party pursuant to which we agreed to pay the third party i) $0.3 million for capital markets advisory services provided related to the Merger, and ii) $0.2 million for services provided related to the benefit of the holders of AAC and Legacy Zapata securities. On March 27, 2024, we agreed to issue to the third party a Senior Secured Note in the principal aggregate amount of $0.2 million immediately prior to the closing of the Merger in exchange for additional capital markets advisory services provided in connection with the Merger. This Senior Secured Note was then converted into 33,333 shares of our common stock at the closing of the Merger. We recorded a reduction of $0.5 million in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet as a transaction cost in connection with the capital markets advisory services provided. During the year ended December 31, 2024, in connection with the 33,333 shares issued for the additional services, we recognized $0.2 million in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

On February 9, 2024, we entered into an engagement letter with an additional third party, as amended on February 27, 2024, pursuant to which the third party acted as a capital markets advisor to us in connection with the Merger. We agreed to pay the third party a non-refundable cash fee of $1.8 million, payable by us in monthly payments of $0.1 million commencing on the earlier of May 31, 2024 or the effectiveness of the Lincoln Park Registration Statement, until the full advisory fee of $1.8 million has been paid (the “Term”), with $0.3 million of such payment waivable if we voluntarily prepay $1.5 million to the third party prior to December 31, 2024. The Lincoln Park Registration Statement was declared effective on April 18, 2024. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we will pay the full $1.8 million upon consummation of a financing transaction with proceeds of $15.0 million or more (not including sales under the Purchase Agreement or similar financing) during the Term. Upon the closing of the Merger, we recognized $1.8 million as transaction costs, which we recorded as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. We also recorded an obligation of $1.2 million to the third party in accrued expenses and other current liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid $0.6 million to the third party.

In March 2024, Legacy Zapata entered into a placement agent agreement to retain an additional third party for the purpose of raising up to $10.0 million, for a term of 60 days from the execution of the placement agent agreement. Legacy Zapata agreed to pay a cash fee equal to 7.0% of the gross amount of cash proceeds (the “Financing Proceeds”) received by Legacy Zapata from investors introduced by the third party directly to Legacy Zapata. The cash fee is payable within 7 business days following Legacy Zapata’s receipt of proceeds from any investors introduced by the third party. In addition, Legacy Zapata agreed to issue a number of shares of common stock equal to 3.0% of the Financing Proceeds divided by $4.50 upon the closing of the Merger. In connection with the placement agent agreement, we made a cash payment of $0.1 million and issued 11,666 shares of common stock upon the closing of the Merger.

Marketing Services Agreement

On February 9, 2024, prior to the Merger, AAC entered into a marketing services agreement with a third party to promote investor engagement, pursuant to which we agreed to pay the third party in shares of our common stock with a value of $0.3 million upon the closing of the Merger. In connection with our closing of the Merger, we issued 30,706 shares of our common stock to the third party.

Enterprise Solution and Sponsorship Agreements with Andretti Global

One of AAC’s affiliates, Andretti Autosport Holding Company, LLC (f/k/a Andretti Autosport Holding Company, Inc.) (“Andretti Global”) has preexisting contractual relationships with the Company. In February 2022, we entered into i) an enterprise solution subscription agreement and ii) a sponsorship agreement with Andretti Global, both of which expire on December 31, 2024. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded $1.3 million and $1.7 million in revenue, respectively, related to the enterprise solution subscription agreement. We also entered into a managed service agreement with Andretti Global in October 2022, which expired on January 3, 2024. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded $0 and $0.2 million, respectively, in revenue related to the managed service agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded $2.8 million and $2.8 million in sales and marketing expense related to the sponsorship agreement. The remaining committed future payments under the sponsorship agreement at December 31, 2024 include $5.5 million in accounts payable at December 31, 2024. We considered that these agreements were executed prior to the Business Combination Agreement and were not executed in contemplation of the business combination. Accordingly, Andretti Global was not considered a related party prior to the consummation of the Merger with AAC.

On March 28, 2024, we entered into a sponsorship agreement with Andretti Autosport 1, LLC, an affiliate of Andretti Global. The agreement expired on December 31, 2024. We are responsible for payments under the sponsorship agreement totaling $1.0 million.

On March 28, 2024, we entered into an Order Form under the February 2022 enterprise solution subscription agreement with Andretti Global. Pursuant to the agreement, Andretti Global agreed to pay us a total of $1.0 million, subject to our payment of the sponsorship fee to Andretti Autosport 1, LLC. Following the Operational Cessation, the agreement was terminated, and no payments were made.

Purchase Agreements with Lincoln Park

On December 19, 2023, we entered into a purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which Lincoln Park agreed to purchase from us, at our option, an aggregate of up to $75.0 million of our common stock from time to time over a 36-month period following the Commencement Date, subject to certain limitations contained in the Purchase Agreement including, but not limited to, the filing and effectiveness of a registration statement (the “Lincoln Park Registration Statement”). In accordance with the Purchase Agreement, we were required to pay Lincoln Park a commitment fee of $1.7 million (the “Commitment Fee”) as follows: (i) on the business day prior to the filing of the Lincoln Park Registration Statement, $0.6 million in shares of our common stock and (ii) we could elect to pay the remaining $1.1 million amount of the Commitment Fee in either cash or shares of our common stock, with any shares issuable on the business day prior to the filing of the Lincoln Park Registration Statement and any cash due within 90 days of the closing of the Merger. Shares issued as payment for the Commitment Fee are referred to herein as the “Commitment Shares.”

On April 12, 2024, we filed the Lincoln Park Registration Statement, which covers the shares of our common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement (including the Commitment Shares). The Lincoln Park Registration Statement registered for resale up to 13,000,000 shares of common stock (inclusive of the Commitment Shares) that have been or may be issued to Lincoln Park pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. On April 11, 2024, we issued 712,025 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as Commitment Shares at a price of $2.37 per share. As of December 31, 2024, we issued 10,378,780 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park for aggregate proceeds of $7.7 million (excluding the Commitment Fee shares)

On August 13, 2024, we entered into a purchase agreement (the “2024 Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which Lincoln Park agreed to purchase from us, at our option, an aggregate of up to $10.0 million of shares of our common stock from time to time over a 24-month period upon the satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the 2024 Purchase Agreement including, but not limited to, the filing and effectiveness of a registration statement covering shares of common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the 2024 Purchase Agreement. In accordance with the 2024 Purchase Agreement, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as a Commitment Fee. In connection with the 2024 Purchase Agreement, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “2024 Registration Rights Agreement”) with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which we will file a registration statement covering the shares of common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the 2024 Purchase Agreement with the SEC within 15 business days following the date that the 2024 Registration Rights Agreement was executed. We filed the Lincoln Park Registration Statement on September 3, 2024, which was declared effective on September 9, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, the we issued 2,700,000 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park under 2024 Purchase Agreement for aggregate proceeds of $0.9 million (excluding the Commitment Fee shares). In connection with the Operational Cessation described below, the Registration Statement (which is a condition to transactions under the Purchase Agreement) is no longer effective.

2025 Capital Raising and Restructuring Efforts

In June 2025, the Company commenced debt restructuring and capital raising transactions and the reinstatement of operations by (1) entering into exchange agreements with unsecured creditors pursuant to which such creditors agreed to exchange outstanding obligations payable to them for common stock and certain rights related thereto, and (2) the Company sold convertible notes and warrants for gross proceeds of $3 million. The Company has since been continuing efforts to negotiate and restructure outstanding obligations and raise capital. In the furtherance of recommencing operations, the Company has also entered into advisory agreements with third parties and agreed to compensate such parties in the form of equity and/or cash compensation. See Note 20, Subsequent Events in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report.

Operational Cessation

On October 7, 2024, our board of directors approved the cessation of our operations (the “Operational Cessation”) due to insufficient financial resources to continue funding ongoing operations and meet existing obligations. In connection with the Operational Cessation, our board of directors approved the termination of all our employees, except for a small number of employees retained to administer termination business activities, including Sumit Kapur, our Chief Financial Officer. All such employees were terminated effective October 9, 2024. Following the Operational Cessation, we maintained minimal day-to-day operations.

On October 25, 2024, trading of our common stock and warrants was suspended and removed from the listing and registration on Nasdaq.

Operations Prior to Operational Cessation

Prior to the Operational Cessation, we offered specialized generative AI solutions which used techniques inspired by quantum physics and were tailored to solving complex industrial problems. These solutions combined software and related services and were subscription based. Our approach utilized mathematical techniques from the quantum physics community to make computation more efficient and to create models that have other advantages over conventional methods. Our primary target customers were enterprise organizations, which generally consist of large businesses that have high revenue, the size and resources to dominate a specific market and a significant number of employees.

We had a suite of three subscription-based specialized generative AI offerings that included software and software tools supported by services. These offerings consist of:

Restructuring Efforts

As noted above, since the Operational Cessation, we have had minimal day-to-day operations. Management has since concentrated its efforts on restructuring activities aimed at restarting certain aspects of its core business, including capital-raising activities to improve our capital structure and to support the anticipated recommencement of business operations. For additional information regarding these restructuring activities, refer to Note 20 in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Since our inception through December 31, 2024, we have financed our operations primarily through sales of our convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Convertible Preferred Stock”) and common stock and with issuances of Senior Notes and Senior Secured Notes (each as defined below and, collectively, the “Convertible Notes”). For the year ended December 31, 2024 we have incurred net losses of $38.1 million. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $127.7 million and $89.5 million, respectively.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise capital through future equity or debt financing and generate profits from our operations. We are pursuing all available options for funding, which include seeking public or private investments and funding through the sale of equity and debt securities.

In 2025, we raised an aggregate of $3.0 million through the issuance of Convertible Notes and $1.5 million through the sale of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The proceeds from the Convertible Notes were used to repay one of our outstanding Senior Secured Notes. In addition, in 2025, we entered into conversion agreements with certain creditors to settle approximately $9.2 million of liabilities through the issuance of shares of our common stock. We also settled our obligation of $2.4 million under the Forward Purchase Agreement through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock. These activities were undertaken as part of our ongoing efforts to improve the Company’s capital structure and provide the liquidity necessary to support restarting certain aspects of our core business.

Although we believe that we will be able to continue to raise funds through the sale of our securities to provide the additional funding needed to meet our obligations, the restructuring activities aimed at restarting certain aspects of our core business will require substantial additional funding and there is no assurance that we will be able to continue raising the additional capital necessary to continue operations and execute on our business plan.

These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. We have evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued. We have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since the inception of Legacy Zapata in November 2017 and expects to continue to incur losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future as we expand our penetration of the quantum computing application development solutions market.

See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for additional information.

Components of Our Results of Operations

Revenue

Our revenue is generated primarily from sales of subscriptions to our software platform and related services. Subscriptions to our software platform are offered as stand-ready access to our cloud environment on an annual or multi-year basis. We may also offer consulting services in the form of stand-ready scientific and software engineering services, which are typically only offered in conjunction with our software platform. We evaluate our contracts at inception to determine if the terms represent a single, combined performance obligation or multiple performance obligations.

Under our consulting contracts, our deliverables may include integrated quantum, classical or hybrid quantum-classical computing solutions to our customers or to provide research and development services regarding the potential benefits of these solutions to use cases specified by our customer. Our subscription-based solutions consist of our commitment to provide access to our hosted software platform throughout the contract term along with stand-ready scientific and software engineering services.

Revenue from subscriptions to our software platform to date have only been sold as access to the platform in our hosted environment and are therefore recognized over the contract term on a ratable basis, as the commitment represents a stand-ready performance obligation.

Revenue from consulting services is generally recognized over the contract term as performance is completed on the performance obligations identified. Revenue from stand-ready scientific and engineering services are recognized over the contract term on a ratable basis, as the obligation represents a stand-ready obligation.

From time to time, we may enter into arrangements to build license applications that can be used in conjunction with our software platform. To date, the license application built has been delivered as a perpetual license with associated post-contract support. We recognize the license at the time of deployment, and the related post-contract support over the contracted service period on a ratable basis, as it is provided as a stand-ready service.

Our revenue recognition policies are discussed below under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” and Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue includes expenses related to supporting product offerings. Our primary cost of revenue is personnel costs, including salaries and other personnel-related expense. Cost of revenue also includes costs relating to our information technology and systems, including depreciation, network costs, data center maintenance, database management and data processing costs. We allocate these overhead expenses based on headcount, and thus are reflected in cost of revenue and each operating expense category.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries and wages, benefits, commissions, bonuses and stock-based compensation expense for our employees engaged in sales and sales support, business development, marketing, corporate partnerships, and customer service functions. Sales and marketing expenses also include costs incurred for market research, tradeshows, branding, marketing, promotional expense, and public relations, as well as facilities and other supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization. Sales and marketing expenses are primarily driven by investments in the growth of our business. We expect sales and marketing expenses, expressed as a percentage of revenue, to vary from period to period for the foreseeable future.

Advertising expenses, which are included in sales and marketing expense, primarily include promotional expenditures, and are expensed as incurred. The amounts incurred for advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $3.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries and wages, benefits, bonuses, and stock-based compensation expense for our scientists, engineers and other employees engaged in the research and development of our products. In addition, research and development expenses include third party software subscription costs, facilities and other supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries and wages, bonuses, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense for our finance, legal, information technology, human resources, and other administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses also include facilities and supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization, and external professional services.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net consists primarily of fair value adjustments related to our Senior Secured Notes and derivative contract in connection with our Forward Purchase Agreement, loss associated with amendments to capital markets advisory agreements, interest income, interest expense and foreign exchange gains and losses from our international operations.

Income Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded an income tax benefit and provision of $20 thousand and $20 thousand, respectively. These are related to income taxes from our foreign operations with pre-tax income generated from intercompany activities. We recorded a full valuation allowance of our net deferred tax asset position as of December 31, 2024 as we believe it was more likely than not that we would not be able to utilize our deferred tax assets.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

** Not meaningful

Revenue

Revenue was $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease of $1.8 million was primarily attributable to the Operational Cessation and reductions associated with the completion of legacy contracts partially offset by increases from newly initiated projects in 2024.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue was $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease of $1.4 million was primarily attributable to the Operational Cessation and reductions associated with the completion of legacy contracts partially offset by increases from newly initiated projects in 2024.

Operating Expenses

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expense was $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase of $1.2 million was primarily driven by a $1.0 million increase in costs related to a sponsorship agreement with Andretti Autosport 1, LLC, and a $0.2 million increase in outbound marketing during 2024.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expense was $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease of $1.5 million was primarily driven by a decrease of $1.1 million in personnel costs related to research and development headcount reductions and $0.8 million related to the Operational Cessation, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in hosting charges incurred as a result of a collaborative research agreement that commenced in 2024.  

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $12.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase of $4.7 million was primarily attributable to costs associated with our transition from a private to a public entity. This includes a $2.6 million increase in professional services, a $0.5 million increase in compensation to our board of directors, a $0.8 million increase in directors and officers insurance premiums, and a $0.9 million of costs incurred related to the search and replacement of our general counsel and Chief Financial Officer, and the hiring of our Chief Product Officer.

Other Expense, Net

We recorded other expense, net of $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in other expense, net of $3.5 million resulted primarily from the loss on issuance of Senior Secured Notes of $9.8 million, a $4.9 million loss on issuance of Forward Purchase Agreement, an increase of $1.8 million in transaction costs incurred related to the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement, and a $1.0 million increase in interest expense in connection with our Senior Secured Notes. These increases were partially offset from the conversion of Senior Notes to Senior Secured Notes on December 22, 2023, which resulted in no income or loss related to the remeasurement of the notes to fair value during 2024 compared to a $4.8 million loss on remeasurement of the notes to fair value during 2023, a $6.9 million loss on extinguishment of Senior Notes during 2023, and a $2.5 million change in fair value of the forward purchase agreement derivative liability.

Provision for income taxes

The provision for income taxes was not material during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 and was related to our foreign operations.

Liquidity, Going Concern and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have financed our operations primarily with proceeds from sales of Convertible Preferred Stock and common stock and the issuance of Convertible Notes. As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.4 million, excluding our restricted cash. Since our inception through December 31, 2024, we have sold 14,222,580 shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock for aggregate net proceeds of $64.7 million, received $14.5 million from the issuance of Senior Notes and Senior Secured Notes and $8.6 million in proceeds under an equity line of credit. Our principal use of cash is to fund our operations and platform development to support our growth.

As of November 30, 2025, we had approximately $2,1 million in cash. We do not have sufficient capital to meet our working capital needs for the 12 months following the date we file this Report.

Senior Secured Notes

In December 2023, prior to the Merger, we entered into a Senior Secured Note Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell up to $14.4 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes and offered to exchange our outstanding Senior Notes for Senior Secured Notes. All previously issued Senior Notes were canceled in exchange for Senior Secured Notes with a principal amount equal to the principal amount of the Senior Notes of $5.6 million plus accrued and unpaid interest of $0.6 million, through the date immediately prior to the exchange. We received gross proceeds in cash of $8.9 million from the issuance of Senior Secured Notes, excluding funds received upon the issuance of Senior Notes. In addition, we issued $1.1 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes to third party advisors in lieu of cash payment for services related to the Merger.

The Senior Secured Notes bear interest at the compound rate of 15% per annum and are convertible at the option of each noteholder in connection with the Merger at a conversion price of (i) $4.50 per share at the closing of the Merger or (ii) $8.50 per share at any time after the closing of the Merger. The outstanding principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes and all accrued but unpaid interest will be due and payable at the maturity date, December 15, 2026, unless otherwise converted. Upon the closing of the Merger, a portion of the aggregate outstanding Senior Secured Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $14.2 million and associated accrued interest of $0.5 million were converted into shares of our common stock and Senior Secured Notes with aggregate principal and accrued interest of $2.2 million remain outstanding as of December 31, 2024. While any Senior Secured Notes are outstanding, we cannot incur additional indebtedness for borrowed funds, except additional Senior Secured Notes, substantially similar notes or other debt instruments that are pari passu with or subordinate to the Senior Secured Notes.

Notes Payable – Related Parties

To finance transaction costs in connection with the Merger, the sponsor of AAC and certain of AAC’s officers and directors made working capital loans (the “Notes Payable – Related Party”) to AAC prior to the closing of the Merger. The Notes Payable – Related Party would either be repaid upon the consummation of the Merger, without interest, or at AAC’s discretion, up to $1.5 million of such Notes Payable – Related Party could be converted into Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant on the date of the Merger (see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report).

On March 28, 2024, the terms of the Notes Payable – Related Party were amended, pursuant to which the outstanding principal balance plus the accrued interest of $2.6 million, which was also due per its terms at the closing of the Merger was deferred and became due in monthly installments (including interest accruing from the closing of the Merger through the payment date) for twelve months thereafter beginning thirty days following the effectiveness of the Lincoln Park Registration Statement. The Lincoln Park Registration Statement was declared effective on April 18, 2024. Upon the closing of the Merger, none of the note holders elected to exercise their option of converting their respective loans into warrants. The Notes Payable – Related Party bear interest at a rate of 4.5% per annum. As of December 31, 2024, the outstanding balance of the Notes Payable – Related Party was $1.9 million within our consolidated balance sheet.

Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement

On December 19, 2023, prior to the Merger, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”) pursuant to which Lincoln Park agreed to purchase from us, an aggregate of up to $75.0 million of common stock from time to time over a 36-month period following the closing of the Merger. In addition, we paid Lincoln Park a Commitment Fee through the issuance of 712,025 shares of common stock. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which we are obligated to file the Lincoln Park Registration Statement that covers the shares of common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement (including the Commitment Shares) with the SEC within 45 days following the closing of the Merger. We filed the Lincoln Park Registration Statement on April 12, 2024.

On August 13, 2024, we entered into the 2024 Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park pursuant to which Lincoln Park agreed to purchase from us, an aggregate of up to $10.0 million of shares of common stock from time to time over a 24-month period upon the satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the 2024 Purchase Agreement including, but not limited to, the filing and effectiveness of a registration statement covering shares of common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the 2024 Purchase Agreement. In accordance with the 2024 Purchase Agreement, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as a commitment fee. In connection with the 2024 Purchase Agreement, we also entered into the 2024 Registration Rights Agreement with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which we will file a registration statement covering the shares of common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the 2024 Purchase Agreement with the SEC within 15 business days following the date that the 2024 Registration Rights Agreement was executed. We filed the Lincoln Park Registration Statement on September 3, 2024, which was declared effective on September 9, 2024. In connection with the Operational Cessation described above, the Registration Statement is no longer effective (which is a condition to transactions under the Purchase Agreement).

See Recent Developments above for additional detail on Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement.

Forward Purchase Agreement

On March 25, 2024, we entered into the Forward Purchase Agreement with Sandia, pursuant to which Sandia purchased, from the open market, 1,000,000 Recycled Shares and 500,000 Additional Shares, which represents the maximum number of shares subject to purchase under the Forward Purchase Agreement, subject to adjustment as described below (the “Maximum Number of Shares”). The number of shares subject to the Forward Purchase Agreement (the “Number of Shares”) is subject to reduction following a termination of the Forward Purchase Agreement with respect to such shares.

Pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreement, at the closing of the Merger, we prepaid to Sandia (the “Prepayment”), with respect to the Recycled Shares, with proceeds from the trust account, a cash amount equal to the (x) product of the number of Recycled Shares and (y) $10.99 per share, totaling $11.0 million which was paid at the closing of the Merger. With respect to the Additional Shares, a per share amount equal to $10.99 per share was netted against the proceeds from the Additional Shares received from Sandia, resulting in no cash received or paid for the share issuance.

The reset price (the “Reset Price”) was initially $10.00 per share and will be subject to reset on a monthly basis (each a “Reset Date”), with the first such Reset Date occurring 180 days after the closing date of the Merger, to be greater of (a) $4.50 and (b) the 30-day volume weighted average price of shares of our common stock immediately preceding such Reset Date. Except as described below, the Reset Price will be reduced immediately to any lower price at which we close any agreement to sell or grants any right to reprice, or otherwise disposes of or issues (or announces any offer, sale, grant or any option to purchase or other disposition of) any shares of our common stock or securities or any of our subsidiaries convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into, or otherwise entitles the holder thereof to receive, shares of our common stock or other securities (a “Dilutive Offering and, such reset, a Dilutive Offering Reset”).

In the event of a Dilutive Offering Reset, the Maximum Number of Shares will be increased to an amount equal to the quotient of (i) 1,500,000 divided by (ii) the quotient of (a) the price of such Dilutive Offering divided by (b) $10.00. In such event, Sandia has the right to purchase more Additional Shares, up to the Maximum Number of Shares, for which we will be required to provide a cash prepayment to Sandia netted against the purchase price for such shares, and such Additional Shares will be subject to the terms of the Forward Purchase Agreement.

To the extent Sandia does not early terminate shares purchased under the Forward Purchase Agreement, as described below, the parties will settle the then-outstanding shares held by Sandia upon the Valuation Date, such date being two years from the closing of the Merger, March 28, 2026, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances, including the occurrence of a VWAP Trigger Event, defined as an event that occurs if the volume weighted average price per share on any scheduled trading day, for any 20 trading days during a 30 consecutive trading day-period, is below $1.00 per share. On the Cash Settlement Payment Date, which is the tenth business day following the last day of the valuation period commencing on the Valuation Date, as described in the Forward Purchase Agreement (the “Valuation Period”), Sandia will pay to us a cash amount equal to (A) the number of shares subject to the Forward Purchase Agreement as of the Valuation Date less the number of unregistered shares, multiplied by (B) the volume-weighted average price over the Valuation Period (the “Settlement Amount”); provided, that if the amount of the Settlement Amount Adjustment (as defined below) payable by us to Sandia is less than the Settlement Amount, then the Settlement Amount Adjustment will be automatically netted from the Settlement Amount and any remaining amount paid in cash. We will pay to Sandia on the Cash Settlement Payment Date an amount (the “Settlement Amount Adjustment”) equal to (1) the Number of Shares as of the Valuation Date multiplied by $2.00 per share if the amount is to be paid in cash, or (2) if the Settlement Amount Adjustment exceeds the Settlement Amount, the Counterparty may at its election pay the Settlement Amount Adjustment to Sandia in shares of our common stock, in an amount equal to the product of the number of shares, including the Recycled Shares and the Additional Shares as of the Valuation Date multiplied by $2.25; provided, that in certain circumstances as described in the Forward Purchase Agreement, including if a Delisting Event (as defined in the Forward Purchase Agreement) occurs during the Valuation Period, such amount must be paid in cash.

In addition, during the term of the Forward Purchase Agreement, Sandia may elect to terminate the transaction in whole or in part by providing a written notice to us, which will specify the quantity by which the number of shares will be reduced (such election, an “Optional Early Termination” and, the shares subject to the Optional Early Termination, the “Terminated Shares”). We shall be entitled to an amount from Sandia, equal to the product of (x) the number of Terminated Shares and (y) the Reset Price, on the date of notice.

We determined that the Optional Early Termination provision and the Variable Maturity Consideration, which is the amount of the Settlement Amount Adjustment in excess of the Settlement Amount as defined above, within the Forward Purchase Agreement are considered as a freestanding financial instrument as the Optional Early Termination and the Variable Maturity Consideration cannot be legally detachable and separately exercisable from each other and meet the definition of a derivative. We recorded the initial value of the derivative as a loss on issuance of forward purchase agreement derivative liability of $4.9 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The change in fair value of the forward purchase agreement derivative liability of $2.5 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024, in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The Prepayment Amount is accounted for as a subscription receivable and recorded as a reduction to equity to reflect the substance of the overall arrangement as a net repurchase of the Recycled Shares and the Additional Shares. We recognized a subscription receivable of $11.0 million associated with the Recycled Shares as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheet, included elsewhere in this Annual Report, and a subscription receivable associated with the Additional Shares was fully offset with the proceeds that Sandia paid for the purchase of these shares, resulting in no cash received or paid for such share issuance.

In April 2024, Sandia elected to terminate the transaction in part by exercising the Optional Early Termination provision under the Forward Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which 250,000 shares were terminated. We received payments totaling $2.5 million under the Optional Early Termination provision prescribed in the Forward Purchase Agreement.

In addition, we reimbursed Sandia $0.1 million at the closing of the Merger for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for costs incurred in connection with the transaction, and $0.1 million in expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Recycled Shares. We will also pay to the third party a quarterly fee of $5 thousand in consideration of certain legal and administrative obligations in connection with this transaction.

Under the Forward Purchase Agreement, Sandia had the right to accelerate the Valuation Date upon the occurrence of a VWAP Trigger Event, defined as our common stock trading below $1.00 per share for 20 trading days within any 30 consecutive trading-day period. Following such an event, Sandia exercised this right and accelerated the Valuation Date to October 8, 2024. Accordingly, we became obligated to pay Sandia $2.4 million in cash or shares. In June 2025, we settled our obligation by issuing 6,591,000 shares of our common stock to Sandia. The Forward Purchase Agreement was thereafter terminated.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The factors affecting our operating cash flows during this period were our net loss of $38.1 million, partially offset by a net change in our operating assets and liabilities of $3.8 million and non-cash charges of $16.3 million. The non-cash charges primarily consisted of $9.8 million in the loss on issuance of Senior Secured Notes, $4.9 million in the loss on the forward purchase contract, $2.0 million in equity line of credit commitment expense, $0.9 million in non-cash interest expense, $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expense, $0.2 million in non-cash vendor payments, $0.2 million in non-cash lease expense, $0.1 million in depreciation and amortization expense and $0.1 million loss on fixed assets disposal, partially offset by $2.5 million in change in fair value of forward purchase contract. The change in operating assets and liabilities was driven by a $7.1 million increase in accounts payable, $2.4 million increase in Forward Purchase Agreement Settlement obligation and $0.1 million increase in deferred revenue, partially offset by a $4.3 million decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities, a $0.7 million decrease in deferred legal fees, a $0.5 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current and non-current assets, a $0.3 million decrease in operating lease liabilities and a $0.1 million increase in accounts receivable. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to higher transaction costs and the delayed vendor and sponsorship payments following the Operational Cessation in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Forward Purchase Agreement Settlement obligation was related to the acceleration of the Valuation Date, requiring recognition of $2.4 million liability in the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in deferred revenue is due to the timing of billings related to customer contracts and revenue recognition under customer contracts. The decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities was primarily reflects payments of legal and audit fees. The decrease in deferred legal fees resulted from payments of fees. The increase in prepaid expenses and other current and non-current assets was primarily due to the timing of vendor invoicing and payments for sponsorship fees. The decrease in operating lease liabilities resulted primarily from lease payments. The increase in accounts receivable is due to the timing of billings and collections from customer contracts.

Net cash used in operating activities was $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The factors affecting Legacy Zapata’s operating cash flows during this period were its net loss of $29.7 million, partially offset by a net change in its operating assets and liabilities of $2.0 million and non-cash charges of $12.9 million. The non-cash charges primarily consisted of $0.2 million in depreciation and amortization expense, $4.8 million in the change in fair value of Convertible Notes, $6.9 million in losses on extinguishment of Senior Notes, $0.3 million in non-cash lease expense, and $0.8 million in stock-based compensation expense. The change in operating assets and liabilities was driven by a $3.5 million increase in accounts payable, a $0.5 million increase in accounts receivable, a $0.2 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current and non-current assets, a $1.0 million decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, a $0.2 million increase in deferred revenue and a $0.4 million decrease in operating lease liabilities. The increase in accounts receivable is due to the timing of billings and collections from customer contracts. The increase in accounts payable was primarily related to the timing of invoicing and payments of sponsorship fees and professional services fees. The decrease in prepaid expenses and other current and non-current assets was primarily due to payment of transaction costs related to the Merger. The decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities is primarily due to an increase in accrued legal fees, offset by the payment of consulting and professional fees, the reversal of accrued commissions and reduction in accrued severance, and the payment of sponsorship fees. The decrease in deferred revenue is due to the timing of billings related to customer contracts and the recognition of revenue from customer contracts. The decrease in operating lease liabilities resulted primarily from lease payments.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in investing activities was $34 thousand, primarily consisting of purchases of property and equipment. The purchases of equipment during these periods were primarily related to computer equipment purchases.

There were no investing cash flow activities during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $15.1 million, which consisted of $12.6 million in proceeds from the closing of the Merger, $6.0 million in proceeds received from the issuance of Senior Secured Notes, $8.6 million in proceeds from issuances of common stock under the equity line of credit, $2.5 million in proceeds from the partial early termination of the Forward Purchase Agreement and $0.1 million in proceeds from exercises of stock options, partially offset by the payment of $0.1 million debt discount, payment of $0.6 million of notes payable to related parties, payment of $2.9 million of deferred offering costs and the prepayment of $11.0 million under the Forward Purchase Agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $8.0 million, which consisted of $37 thousand in proceeds from exercises of stock options and $8.3 million in proceeds received from the issuance of Convertible Notes, offset by $0.3 million of transaction costs related to the Merger.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

We have no obligations, assets or liabilities which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements during the periods presented. Zapata and Legacy Zapata have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing agreements, established any special purpose entities, guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or purchased any non-financial assets.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

Leases

As of December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any remaining obligations under operating lease agreements.

License and Collaboration Agreements

During 2018, we entered into an exclusive patent license agreement (the “license agreement”) with a term that continued unless terminated by the licensor or by us. The license agreement contained annual license maintenance fee payments, milestone payments, as well as payments based on a percentage of net sales. Under the license agreement, we issued shares of common stock to the licensor representing four percent of our capital stock on a fully diluted basis.

The license agreement obligated us to pay fixed annual license maintenance fees of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, and $0.1 million per year thereafter until we or the licensor terminate the license. The license agreement obligated us to pay fixed milestone payments upon the achievement of certain sales thresholds. The milestone payments total $0.2 million, and the maximum sales threshold was $25.0 million. We did not trigger any payments to the licensor during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

The license agreement obligated us to pay a royalty equal to two percent of net sales. The license agreement also required us to make payments related to any sublicensing agreements, with varying amounts based on the type of sublicense. We did not pay any royalties during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. On February 10, 2023, we terminated the license agreement by written notice to the licensor. Upon termination, all licensing rights held by us under the license agreement were forfeited to the licensor. We did not owe any accrued obligations or payments to the licensor as of the termination of the license agreement or thereafter.

Sponsorship Agreement

During 2022, we entered into a sponsorship agreement with Andretti Global. The total commitment under the sponsorship agreement is $8.0 million and is due and payable over the period of February 2022 through July 2024. The related expenses are amortized by straight-line method over the period. Through December 31, 2024, we paid $3.5 million under the sponsorship agreement and for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded $2.8 million and $2.8 million in sales and marketing expense related to the sponsorship agreement. There was $5.5 million included in accounts payable as of December 31, 2024 related to the sponsorship agreement.

On March 28, 2024, we entered into an additional sponsorship agreement with Andretti Autosport 1, LLC, an affiliate of Andretti Global. The agreement expired on December 31, 2024. Subject to the agreement, we are responsible for payments under the sponsorship agreement an amount totaling $1.0 million.

Notes Payable—Related Parties

Pursuant to a Deferred Payment Agreement dated as of March 28, 2024, we amended the terms of our notes payable to related parties, pursuant to which the aggregate principal balance of the notes plus accrued interest through the closing of the Merger of $2.6 million was deferred at closing and became due in monthly installments (including interest accruing from the closing of the Merger though the payment date) beginning thirty days following the effectiveness of the Lincoln Park Registration Statement. The balance will be payable over a twelve-month term (including interest accruing from the closing of the Merger though the payment date). The Lincoln Park Registration Statement was declared effective on April 18, 2024. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.5% per annum.

Advisory and Other Agreements

In connection with the Merger, on September 13, 2023, we entered into an agreement with a third party for advisory services. In March 2024, the payment terms were amended to provide for a fee of $1.3 million, to be paid by the issuance of a Senior Secured Note with a principal amount of $1.0 million and the remaining $0.3 million in six monthly installments in cash of $42 thousand per month commencing on May 15, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid $0.2 million to the third party.

On February 9, 2024, we entered into an engagement letter with an additional third party, as amended on February 27, 2024. We agreed to pay the third party a non-refundable cash fee of $1.8 million, payable in monthly payments over the Term (as defined in Recent Developments), with $0.3 million of such payment waivable if we voluntarily prepay $1.5 million to the third party prior to December 31, 2024. Upon the closing of the Merger, we recognized $1.8 million as transaction costs, which was recorded as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid $0.6 million to the third party.

As of December 31, 2024, there were remaining obligations of $5.0 million recorded in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and non-current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. These obligations are expected to be fully repaid by December 31, 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid $2.3 million under the agreements.

Legal Services Fees

In connection with the Merger, we incurred $4.0 million of deferred legal fees to be paid to AAC’s legal advisors upon consummation of the Merger, which were recorded as deferred legal fees in the historical audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023. On March 26, 2024, we entered into a fee letter for legal services rendered in connection with the Merger, pursuant to which the total fee of $3.3 million was to be paid in equal monthly installments of $0.3 million per month over the twelve-month period starting on April 18, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid $0.7 million to the legal advisors.

Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement

In accordance with the Purchase Agreement, we paid Lincoln Park a commitment fee of approximately $1.7 million, which was recorded within other (expense) income, net in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024, and was payable as follows: (i) on the business day prior to the filing of the Lincoln Park Registration Statement, $0.6 million in shares of common stock and (ii) we elected to pay the remaining $1.1 million amount of the Commitment Fee in either cash or shares of our common stock, with any shares issuable on the business day prior to the filing of the Registration Statement and any cash due within 90 days of the closing date of the Merger. On April 11, 2024, we issued 712,025 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as consideration for the Commitment Fee.

On August 13, 2024, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “2024 Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which Lincoln Park agreed to purchase from us, at our option, an aggregate of up to $10 million of shares of common stock from time to time over a 24-month period upon the satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the 2024 Purchase Agreement including, but not limited to, the filing and effectiveness of a registration statement covering shares of common stock that are issuable to Lincoln Park under the 2024 Purchase Agreement. In accordance with the 2024 Purchase Agreement, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as a commitment fee. The Company does not intend to make additional sales under the 2024 Purchase Agreement, which would among other conditions require the filing and effectiveness of a new registration statement.

Forward Purchase Agreement

On October 8, 2024, we received notice from Sandia accelerating the Valuation Date to October 8, 2024. Upon acceleration, we became obligated to pay Sandia $2.4 million in cash or in shares. In June 2025, we issued 6,591,000 shares of our common stock in full settlement of our obligation to Sandia. The Forward Purchase Agreement was thereafter terminated.

Recent Financing and Restructuring Transactions

For a description of certain capital raising and restructuring activities we have conducted in 2025, see Note 20, Subsequent Events in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses incurred during the reporting periods. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events, and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities recorded revenues and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report, we believe that the following accounting policies are those most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, we recognize revenue when we satisfy a performance obligation by transferring goods or services promised in a contract to a customer, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services.

We recognize revenue using the following steps: (1) identification of the contract, or contracts with a customer, (2) identification of performance obligations in the contract, (3) determination of the transaction price, (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognition of revenue when or as we satisfy the performance obligations.

At contract inception, we assess the goods and services promised in our contracts with customers and identify a performance obligation for each promise, implicit or explicit, to transfer to the customer a good or service (or bundle of goods or services) that is distinct.

We currently earn revenue primarily from subscriptions to our software platform and related services. Subscriptions to our software platform are currently offered as stand-ready access to our cloud environment on an annual or multi-year basis. Our consulting services may result in either single or multiple performance obligations based on the contractual terms. We may also offer services in the form of stand-ready scientific and software engineering services, which are typically only offered in conjunction with the software platform. We evaluate our contracts at inception to determine if the promises represent a single, combined performance obligation, or multiple performance obligations. We allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations identified. Judgment is required to allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation. We utilize a stand-alone selling price methodology based on observable or estimated prices for each performance obligation. We consider market conditions, entity-specific factors, and information about the customer that is reasonably available to the entity when estimating stand-alone selling price for those performance obligations without an observable selling price. Our contracts do not contain rights of return, and any variable consideration as the result of service level agreements has been immaterial. We do not have other contractual terms that give rise to variable consideration.

Revenue from subscriptions to our software platform to date have only been sold as access to the platform in our hosted environment and are therefore recognized over the contract term on a ratable basis, as the promise represents a stand-ready performance obligation.

Revenue from consulting services is generally recognized over time. Our contracts typically contain fixed-fee transaction prices. We determine and record a provision for loss contracts at the contract level when the current estimate of total costs of the contract at completion exceeds the total consideration we expect to receive. We have not recorded any provision for loss contracts at December 31, 2024. For consulting services, we measure progress toward satisfaction of the performance obligation as the services are provided, and revenue is generally recognized based on the labor hours expended over time. Through this method, we recognize revenue based on the actual labor hours incurred to date compared to the current estimate of total labors hours to satisfy the performance obligation. This method requires periodic updates to the total estimated hours to complete the contract, and these updates may include subjective assessments and judgments. We had limited contracts, where based on our determination of the enforceability of payment terms, revenue was recognized at a point in time when payment became enforceable.

From time to time, we may enter into arrangements to build license applications that can be used in conjunction with our software platform. To date, the license application built has been delivered as a perpetual license with associated post-contract support. We recognize the license at the time of deployment, and the related post-contract support over the contracted service period on a ratable basis, as it is provided as a stand-ready service.

Revenue from services sold in the form of stand-ready scientific and software engineering services are recognized over the contract term on a ratable basis, as the obligation represent a stand-ready obligation.

Our payment terms vary by contract and do not contain significant financing components. Amounts collected in advance of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets.

Areas of Judgment and Estimation

Our contracts with customers can include multiple promises to transfer goods and services to the customer, which may be provided over one or more specified phases in the contract. Determining whether promises and/or phases are distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately or not distinct within the context of the contract and, thus, accounted for together, requires significant judgment. When customer contracts include promises for multiple goods, services and/or phases, we determine whether the nature of our promise is to transfer (a) multiple promised goods, services and/or phases or (b) a combined item that comprises multiple promised services and/or phases.

For consulting services performance obligations that are satisfied over time, we measure progress toward satisfaction of the performance obligation as the services are provided, and revenue is generally recognized based on the labor hours expended over time. Through this method, we recognize revenue based on the actual labor hours incurred to date compared to the current estimate of total labors hours to satisfy the performance obligation. We believe this method best reflects the transfer of control to the customer. This method requires periodic updates to the total estimated hours to complete the contract, and these updates may include subjective assessments and judgments.

Significant estimates and assumptions are used in the determination of the stand-alone selling price when multiple performance obligations are identified. We utilize a stand-alone selling price methodology based on observable or estimated prices for each performance obligation. We consider market conditions, entity-specific factors, and information about the customer that is reasonably available to the entity when estimating stand-alone selling price for those performance obligations without an observable selling price. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could affect our financial position and results of operations.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

We measure stock-based options granted to employees, directors, and non-employees based on their fair value on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock options. Compensation expense for those awards is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. Compensation expense for awards to non-employees with service-based vesting conditions is recognized in the same manner as if we had paid cash in exchange for the goods or services, which is generally the over the vesting period of the award. We use the straight-line method to recognize the expense of awards with service-based vesting conditions. We account for forfeitures of stock-based awards as they occur. As of December 31, 2024, all awards have service-based vesting conditions.

Determination of the Fair Value of Legacy Zapata Common Stock

The fair value of the common stock of Legacy Zapata has been determined by management with consideration to a third-party valuation, which contemplates a broad range of factors, including the illiquid nature of the investment in Legacy Zapata’s common stock, our historical financial performance and financial position, our future prospects and opportunity for liquidity events, and recent sale and offer prices of common and Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, in private transactions negotiated at arm’s length.

Senior Notes and Senior Secured Notes

Through December 31, 2024, we have issued $5.6 million in Senior Notes, all of which were canceled and, inclusive of interest of $0.6 million, exchanged for Senior Secured Notes on December 22, 2023, and $10.0 million in Senior Secured Notes to certain lenders. We performed an analysis of all of the terms and features of the Senior Notes and Senior Secured Notes. We elected the Fair Value Option to account for the Senior Notes as we identified embedded derivatives, such as voluntary conversion upon qualified financing, automatic conversion upon a De-SPAC Transaction, defined as a business combination between Legacy Zapata and a special purpose acquisition company, with or without a private investment in public equity (“PIPE”), automatic conversion upon an initial public offering, repayment under a change of control event, and optional conversion under prepayment, all of which would require bifurcation and separate accounting. The Senior Notes were remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date until they were converted to Senior Secured Notes in December 2023. Changes to the fair value of the Senior Notes was recorded in other (expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. We had also elected the option of combining interest expense and the change in fair value as a single line item within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The analysis of the fair value of the Senior Notes contained inherent assumptions related to the market interest rate, the probability of alternate financing, change of control, initial public offering, De-SPAC Transaction with or without a PIPE, maturity extension, and payment at original maturity. Due to the use of significant unobservable inputs, the overall fair value measurement of the Senior Notes was classified as Level 3.

We account for our Senior Secured Note issued to a third party for capital market advisory services in connection with the Merger as a stock-based award granted to non-employees and measure the award based on the merger date fair value using the binomial lattice model. The award is marked to its redemption value, including paid in-kind interest, if such value exceeds the fair value of the award at the merger date and each reporting period thereafter and we will recognize the additional fair value amount over redemption value as necessary.

We account for our remaining Senior Secured Notes at amortized cost, as they were issued at a substantial premium and do not qualify for the Fair Value Option. Legacy Zapata concluded that the optional conversion feature was not required to be bifurcated or separately accounted for as a derivative. Costs related to the issuance of the remaining Senior Secured Notes were recorded as a debt discount as a reduction of the carrying value of the notes and amortized over the term of the notes and are recorded in other (expense) income, net within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss using the effective interest method.

Upon the closing of the Merger, a portion of the aggregate outstanding Senior Secured Notes converted into 3,257,876 shares of common stock (856,202 to related parties). Upon the conversion of the Senior Secured Notes, the principal balance of the debt of $14.2 million and associated accrued interest of $0.5 million were converted, resulting in an increase in common stock and additional paid-in capital of $14.7 million. Certain holders of the Senior Secured Notes, holding $2.0 million in aggregate principal amount, did not convert their Senior Secured Notes into shares of common stock and are recognized at amortized cost. As of December 31, 2024, the $2.2 million of aggregate principal and accrued interest on the outstanding Senior Secured Notes did not include any associated costs that are being recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the remaining term of the outstanding Senior Secured Notes.

Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Liability

We utilized a Monte-Carlo simulation to value the Forward Purchase Agreement derivative liability. We determined that the Forward Purchase Agreement contains (i) an Optional Early Termination provision, and (ii) a Variable Maturity Consideration. The Optional Early Termination and the Variable Maturity Consideration, as combined, are considered as a freestanding financial instrument and meet the definition of a derivative instrument. The fair value of the forward purchase agreement derivative liability, consisting of the Optional Early Termination and the Variable Maturity Consideration, was estimated using a Monte-Carlo Simulation in a risk-neutral framework. The fair value of the derivative liability was equal to the difference between the fair value of the Forward Purchase Agreement and the amount of cash receivable at the two-year settlement date, which was calculated as the present value of the initial reset price of $10.00 per share (as defined in the Forward Purchase Agreement) discounted using the term-matched risk-free rate.

We recorded the initial value of the instrument as a loss on issuance of forward purchase agreement derivative liability of $4.9 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The change in fair value of the forward purchase agreement derivative liability of $2.5 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024, in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that may potentially impact our financial position and results of operations is disclosed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Emerging Growth Company Status

Zapata Quantum Inc. qualifies as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Pursuant to the JOBS Act, an emerging growth company is provided the option to adopt new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or the SEC either (i) within the same periods as those otherwise applicable to non-emerging growth companies or (ii) within the same time periods as private companies. We intend to take advantage of the exemption for complying with new or revised accounting standards within the same time periods as private companies. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies. We also intend to take advantage of some of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies pursuant to the JOBS Act so long as it qualifies as an emerging growth company, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation and golden parachute payments. 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies

53

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Zapata Quantum, Inc.

Boston, MA

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Zapata Quantum, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1, the Company has had recurring losses from operations since inception and has incurred a net loss and used cash in operations during the year ended December 31, 2024. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the financial statements. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.

/s/ Weinberg & Company, P.A.

Los Angeles, California

December 9, 2025

ZAPATA QUANTUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 ZAPATA QUANTUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)