|
|
PRESS RELEASE | NASDAQ: IPX | ASX: IPX
June 4, 2026
|
|
IperionX Limited (NASDAQ: IPX, ASX: IPX) (IperionX or Company) is pleased to announce the results of the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS or Study)
for the Company’s 100%-owned Titan Critical Minerals Project (Titan or Project), located near Camden, Tennessee, United States.
The DFS confirms Titan as a large-scale, technically robust and high-return critical minerals project designed to produce titanium, zircon and a heavy rare earth concentrate from a single
domestic resource in the United States. The Study underpins an initial 14-year mine plan based entirely on Proved and Probable Ore Reserves, with no Inferred Mineral Resources included in the Production Target.
|
| ■ |
Compelling after-tax returns: DFS delivers after-tax NPV8 of US$813 million, after-tax IRR of 39% and an
after-tax payback period of 3.6 years
|
||
| ■ |
Significant
cash generation: Forecast life-of-mine EBITDA of US$2.8 billion and after-tax free cash flow of US$1.9 billion over an initial 14-year mine plan
|
||
| ■ |
Capital-efficient staged
development: Phase 1 development capital of US$228.1 million and Phase
2 incremental capital of US$153.2 million, for total development capital of US$381.3 million
|
||
|
■
|
Strong
scale-up to Phase 2 cash flow: Phase 2 forecast average annual EBITDA of US$226 million and average annual after-tax free cash flow of US$172 million.
|
||
|
■
|
Maiden
Ore Reserve: Reserves of 117 million tons at 3.2% THM, containing 3.7 million tons THM, with approximately 80% of Ore Reserves classified as Proved
|
||
|
■
|
High-value critical mineral
products: Multi-critical mineral platform for American supply-chains
from a single domestic resource base, including rare earths, titanium minerals and zircon. Phase 2 annual production forecast of approximately 5,287 tpa HREC (Heavy Rare Earth Concentrate), 118,658 tpa ilmenite, 24,656 tpa rutile and
65,668 tpa zircon concentrate
|
||
|
■
|
Heavy rare earth leverage: Titan HREC contains strategically important heavy rare earths dysprosium, terbium
and yttrium (Dy, Tb, Y) and other heavy rare earth elements representing a large share of HREC basket value. The heavy rare earths are vital for U.S. supply chains for high-performance magnets, defense, advanced ceramics, aerospace,
and semiconductor applications
|
||
|
■
|
Titanium and zircon critical
minerals: Titan is positioned as a near-term, U.S.-based critical
minerals platform for titanium and zircon critical minerals for downstream domestic metal production
|
||
|
■
|
Simple,
modular execution pathway: Titan is a near-surface, free-dig mineral sands development with no blasting or hard-rock crushing, using industry standard wet concentration, flotation and dry mineral separation
|
||
|
■
|
U.S.
infrastructure advantage: Titan Project is located in west Tennessee near road, rail, barge, power, water and gas infrastructure, with access to an established regional industrial workforce
|
||
|
■
|
U.S.
Government-supported DFS pathway: The DFS was supported under U.S. Government IBAS-related funding, reinforcing Titan’s strategic relevance to resilient domestic critical minerals and titanium supply chains for defense,
aerospace, advanced manufacturing, energy and robotics
|
||
|
■
|
Strategic
U.S. minerals-to-metals platform: Titan is positioned to underpin domestic critical mineral feedstock for U.S. heavy rare earth, titanium, zirconium and advanced materials supply chains, while complementing IperionX’s
downstream titanium metal technologies and Virginia manufacturing platform
|
||
|
Tennessee
|
Utah
|
||
|
1092 Confroy Drive
South Boston, VA 24592
|
279 West Main Street
Camden, TN 38320
|
1782 W 2300 S
West Valley City, UT 84119
|
|
|
IperionX Limited ABN 84 618 935 372
|
|||




|
METRIC
|
UNIT
|
PHASE 1
|
PHASE 2
|
|
|
Mine life
|
Years
|
1-4
|
5-14
|
|
|
Annual ore feed
|
Mt pa
|
3.5
|
10
|
|
|
Ore and waste
|
Mt
|
117.0 Mt ore; 95.6 Mt waste (strip ratio: 0.82)
|
||
|
Total development capital
|
US$
|
$228.1M
|
$153.2M
|
|
|
Operating costs
|
US$/t ore
|
$13.31
|
$10.57
|
|
|
Total LOM EBITDA
|
US$
|
$2.8B
|
||
|
Total after-tax free cash flow
|
US$
|
$1.9B
|
||
|
Phase 2 avg. annual EBITDA
|
US$ pa
|
$226M
|
||
|
Phase 2 avg. annual after-tax FCF
|
US$ pa
|
$172M
|
||
|
After-tax NPV8
|
US$
|
$813M
|
||
|
After-tax IRR
|
%
|
39.4%
|
||
|
After-tax payback period
|
Years
|
3.6
|
||
|
Phase 2 annual production
|
tpa
|
HREC: 5,287
|
||
|
Ilmenite: 118,658
|
||||
|
Rutile: 24,656
|
||||
|
Zircon concentrate.: 65,668
|
||||



| • |
Neodymium and praseodymium are the foundation of high-power NdFeB permanent magnets.
|
| • |
Dysprosium and terbium enable those magnets to maintain coercivity and performance at elevated temperatures, which is essential for missiles, aircraft, electric drives,
drones, robotics, naval systems, actuators and harsh-environment industrial equipment.
|
| • |
Yttrium is a high-impact heavy rare earth used in yttria-stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings, YAG lasers, YIG microwave components, plasma etch chamber coatings,
advanced ceramics, specialty electronics and semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
|


|
SUPPLY-CHAIN NODE
|
U.S. ACTIVITY
|
STRATEGIC GAP
|
TITAN RELEVANCE
|
||||
|
Primary mining / concentrate
|
MP Materials Mountain Pass; IperionX Titan HREC
|
Mountain Pass is light rare earth dominant; U.S. lacks domestic heavy rare earth feedstock
|
Titan is positioned as a U.S. source of HREC enriched in Dy, Tb and Y
|
||||
|
Rare earth separation
|
MP Materials; Lynas USA; Energy Fuels White Mesa pathway
|
Separation capacity requires qualified, scalable feedstock
|
Titan may provide domestic monazite / xenotime-bearing feedstock
|
||||
|
Metallization / alloys
|
Vulcan Elements; E-VAC; MP Materials
|
Metal and alloy capacity needs separated oxides, including Dy/Tb for defense-grade magnets
|
Titan can support upstream feedstock security for downstream metals and alloy production
|
||||
|
Magnet manufacturing
|
E-VAC, Noveon, TDA, MP Materials 10X, Vulcan
|
High-temperature NdFeB magnets require reliable Dy/Tb supply
|
Titan targets the heavy rare earth bottleneck required for high-performance magnets
|
||||
|
Recycling and secondary recovery
|
ReElement, other recyclers
|
Valuable but not a substitute for mine-scale primary supply
|
Titan has the potential to provide primary supply that can complement recycling and circular supply chains
|
|
REPRESENTATIVE U.S.
COMPANY
|
RELEVANT PLATFORMS
|
WHY RARE EARTH MAGNETS OR HREE MATTER
|
|||
|
Lockheed Martin
|
F-35, missiles, space systems
|
Permanent magnets support motors, actuators, sensors and other compact high-power-density systems; Dy/Tb support high-temperature magnet performance.
|
|||
|
RTX / Raytheon
|
Missiles, radar, air-defense systems
|
Rare earth magnets and yttrium-bearing microwave materials support guidance, actuation, radar and electronic systems.
|
|||
|
Northrop Grumman
|
Autonomous aircraft, defense electronics, space systems
|
Motors, actuators, sensors and payload systems rely on high-performance magnetic materials.
|
|||
|
General Dynamics
|
Nuclear submarines, land systems, defense platforms
|
Permanent magnets are relevant to compact motors, generators, actuators and submarine systems.
|
|||
|
Boeing
|
Aircraft, defense and space platforms
|
Aerospace systems use high-reliability motors, actuators, generators and sensor systems where rare earth magnets can reduce weight and size.
|
|||
|
GE Aerospace
|
Jet engines and aerospace power systems
|
Rare earth magnets support high-density electrical systems; yttrium is critical to thermal barrier coatings.
|
|||
|
GM / Ford
|
EVs and advanced vehicle platforms
|
NdFeB magnets are used in high-efficiency traction motors and automotive actuators; Dy/Tb improve high-temperature performance.
|
|||
|
Tesla
|
EVs, robotics and energy products
|
Permanent magnet motors and robotics systems demand nodes for NdPr and potentially Dy/Tb depending on design.
|
|||
|
Lam Research / Applied Materials
|
Semiconductor manufacturing equipment
|
Yttria coatings are used in plasma etch environments; rare earth magnets are used in equipment subsystems
|
| • |
48 tpa Dy₂O₃
|
| • |
11 tpa Tb₄O₇
|
| • |
232 tpa Y₂O₃
|

|
TITAN HREC ATTRIBUTE
|
DFS-BASED VALUE
|
|
|
HREC production
|
5,287 tpa in Phase 2
|
|
|
TREO grade
|
61.4% TREO
|
|
|
Contained Dy2O3
|
~48 tpa at Phase 2
|
|
|
Contained Tb4O7
|
~11 tpa at Phase 2
|
|
|
Contained Y2O3
|
~232 tpa at Phase 2
|

|
REPRESENTATIVE U.S.
COMPANY
|
RELEVANT PRODUCTS /
PLATFORMS
|
WHY TITANIUM MATTERS
|
|||
|
Lockheed Martin
|
F-35, missiles, hypersonics, space and rotorcraft systems
|
Titanium supports airframe structures, bulkheads, fasteners and high-strength lightweight components where weight, fatigue life and heat performance matter.
|
|||
|
RTX / Pratt & Whitney / Raytheon
|
Military and commercial engines, missiles, radar and precision systems
|
Titanium is used in engine structures, rotating and static components, housings and missile / aerospace hardware that require strength-to-weight and durability.
|
|||
|
Boeing
|
Military aircraft, commercial aircraft, space systems and rotorcraft
|
Titanium supports airframes, landing gear, pylons, fasteners and composite-compatible structures while reducing weight and improving corrosion resistance.
|
|
REPRESENTATIVE U.S.
COMPANY
|
RELEVANT PRODUCTS /
PLATFORMS
|
WHY TITANIUM MATTERS
|
|||
|
Northrop Grumman
|
B-21, uncrewed aircraft, space and missile systems
|
Titanium enables lightweight, qualified structures and mission-critical components for long-life defense and space platforms.
|
|||
|
General Dynamics
|
Submarines, combat vehicles, munitions and mission systems
|
Titanium provides corrosion resistance, weight reduction and survivability in marine, armor and high-reliability defense applications.
|
|||
|
Huntington Ingalls Industries
|
U.S. Navy ships, submarines and shipyard sustainment
|
Titanium is relevant to seawater-resistant piping, heat exchangers, specialty marine systems and high-integrity naval components.
|
|||
|
GE Aerospace
|
Jet engines and advanced propulsion systems
|
Titanium alloys support compressor and engine-adjacent structures where low weight and high fatigue performance are required.
|
|||
|
Honeywell Aerospace
|
Engines, APUs, avionics-adjacent and thermal systems
|
Titanium supports lightweight engine hardware, thermal management and corrosion-resistant aerospace components.
|
|||
|
Howmet Aerospace
|
F-35 bulkheads, forgings, fasteners, castings and aerospace materials
|
Howmet is a critical titanium supplier into F-35 and aerospace structures, making qualified titanium input security directly relevant.
|
|||
|
ATI / Precision Castparts / Carpenter Technology
|
Titanium mill products, forgings, specialty alloys and engineered components
|
These suppliers convert titanium input streams into qualified products that downstream defense and aerospace primes require.
|

| • |
Army: M777 Howitzer structures, lightweight armored systems and vehicle components.
|
| • |
Navy: submarine components, seawater-resistant piping, valves, fasteners, pumps and heat exchangers.
|
| • |
Air Force: F-22 and F-35 airframes, bulkheads, structural components, fasteners and engine-adjacent systems.
|
| • |
Missiles and hypersonics: high-strength lightweight structures, thermal-resistant components, propulsion-adjacent hardware and complex precision parts.
|
| • |
Space systems: qualified structural components, fasteners, thermal hardware and high-reliability mission components.
|

| • |
Green Rutile™ and ARH™ enrichment / upgrading technologies to improve titanium feedstock quality.
|
| • |
HAMR™ to reduce titanium feedstock or scrap into titanium powder.
|
| • |
HSPT™ / powder metallurgy to manufacture high-performance titanium components and potential mill-product pathways.
|


| • |
Nuclear energy and naval propulsion: zirconium alloys for nuclear fuel cladding; hafnium for control rods.
|
| • |
Hypersonics and space: hafnium-bearing superalloys, refractory alloys, high-temperature ceramics and thermal protection systems.
|
| • |
Jet engines and propulsion: zirconia and yttria-stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings; hafnium-bearing alloy systems.
|
| • |
Semiconductors: hafnium oxide high-k dielectrics; zirconia / yttria ceramics for plasma-facing components.
|
| • |
Advanced ceramics: zirconia and YSZ for wear resistance, heat resistance, insulation and harsh-environment reliability.
|
|
REPRESENTATIVE U.S.
COMPANY
|
RELEVANT PRODUCTS / PLATFORMS
|
WHY ZIRCONIUM / HAFNIUM MATTER
|
|||
|
Westinghouse
|
Nuclear fuel, fuel assemblies and reactor services
|
Zirconium alloys are core fuel-cladding materials; hafnium can be used in control rods because of neutron absorption.
|
|||
|
BWX Technologies
|
Naval nuclear components, nuclear fuel and government services
|
Zr/Hf materials are relevant to nuclear materials, reactor systems and high-specification defense supply chains.
|
|||
|
GE Vernova / GE Hitachi
|
Nuclear reactors, energy systems and industrial equipment
|
Zirconium alloys and zirconia ceramics support nuclear, turbine and high-temperature energy applications.
|
|||
|
Framatome Inc.
|
Nuclear fuel assemblies and reactor components
|
Zirconium alloy cladding and related nuclear materials require qualified supply chains.
|
|||
|
Lockheed Martin
|
Space, missile defense, hypersonics and propulsion-adjacent systems
|
Zr/Hf ceramics and refractory alloys are relevant to high-temperature structures, thermal protection and propulsion components.
|
|||
|
RTX / Pratt & Whitney / Raytheon
|
Jet engines, missiles, sensors and defense electronics
|
YSZ coatings, hafnium-bearing superalloys and advanced ceramics support high-temperature propulsion and electronics reliability.
|
|||
|
Northrop Grumman
|
Space systems, missiles, propulsion and autonomous platforms
|
Zr/Hf pathways support thermal protection, propulsion hardware and mission-critical high-temperature materials.
|
|||
|
Applied Materials / Lam Research
|
Semiconductor fabrication equipment and process systems
|
Zirconia/yttria ceramics and hafnium oxide are relevant to plasma-facing components and high-k dielectric materials.
|
|||
|
CoorsTek / Saint-Gobain Ceramics
|
Advanced technical ceramics and industrial components
|
Zirconia and YSZ ceramics provide wear resistance, heat resistance and electrical / thermal performance.
|
|||
|
Corning / specialty glass and ceramics suppliers
|
Specialty glass, ceramics, optics and industrial products
|
Zircon and zirconia improve heat, chemical and mechanical performance in specialty glass and ceramic systems.
|
|
Company / project
|
Status
|
Proved reserves
|
Probable reserves
|
Total reserves
|
Grade
|
|
|
IperionX / Titan
|
DFS
|
93.3 Mt
|
23.7 Mt
|
117.0
|
3.2% THM
|
|
|
MP Materials / Mountain Pass
|
Producer
|
1.0 Mt
|
27.9 Mt
|
29.0
|
5.9% TREO
|



| ■ |
Critical minerals supply security: Titan would produce minerals used in titanium dioxide, titanium metal, ceramics, foundry, advanced manufacturing, permanent magnets,
defense systems and energy-transition technologies.
|
| ■ |
Domestic production: The Project is located in Tennessee, enabling domestic production of critical mineral concentrates and reducing exposure to long global supply
chains.
|
| ■ |
Titanium supply chain integration: IperionX’s broader titanium strategy provides a potential downstream pathway for titanium feedstocks, supporting a more integrated
U.S. titanium ecosystem.
|
| ■ |
Rare earth resilience: HREC production provides exposure to rare earth elements, including heavy rare earths, that are important to magnet, defense and high-performance
technology supply chains.
|
| ■ |
Heavy rare earth enriched product: Titan’s HREC product lines are enriched in heavy rare earth oxides, most notably Dy, Tb, and Y, which are especially at risk for
foreign import reliance in the U.S.
|
| ■ |
Industrial policy alignment: The Project is aligned with U.S. policy themes focused on critical minerals, defense production, re-shoring, domestic manufacturing and
supply chain resilience.
|
|
Mineral Resource Estimate
|
In situ tons
|
THM
|
THM
|
THM Assemblage
|
||||
|
Zircon
|
Rutile
|
Ilmenite
|
REE
|
|||||
|
(%)
|
(t)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
|||
|
Inclusive of Reserve
|
||||||||
|
Measured (M)
|
120,434,000
|
2.5
|
3,060,000
|
11.1
|
9.5
|
40.9
|
1.5
|
|
|
Indicated (I)
|
28,388,000
|
2.9
|
828,000
|
11.8
|
9.2
|
52.0
|
1.5
|
|
|
Total M+I
|
148,823,000
|
2.6
|
3,887,000
|
11.2
|
9.4
|
43.2
|
1.5
|
|
|
Inferred (Inf)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Total M+I+Inf
|
148,823,000
|
2.6
|
3,887,000
|
11.2
|
9.4
|
43.2
|
1.5
|
|
|
Exclusive of Reserve
|
||||||||
|
Measured (M)
|
96,851,000
|
1.5
|
1,489,000
|
10.4
|
9.2
|
40.1
|
1.2
|
|
|
Indicated (I)
|
102,190,000
|
2.0
|
2,013,000
|
9.8
|
10.2
|
38.9
|
1.5
|
|
|
Total M+I
|
199,041,000
|
1.8
|
3,502,000
|
10.0
|
9.8
|
39.4
|
1.4
|
|
|
Inferred (Inf)
|
97,832,000
|
1.8
|
1,774,000
|
9.3
|
9.6
|
38.0
|
1.2
|
|
|
Total M+I+Inf
|
296,872,000
|
1.8
|
5,276,000
|
9.8
|
9.7
|
39.0
|
1.3
|
|
|
Grand Total
|
||||||||
|
Measured (M)
|
217,285,000
|
2.1
|
4,548,000
|
10.8
|
9.4
|
40.6
|
1.4
|
|
|
Indicated (I)
|
130,578,000
|
2.2
|
2,841,000
|
10.4
|
9.9
|
42.7
|
1.5
|
|
|
Total M+I
|
347,863,000
|
2.1
|
7,389,000
|
10.6
|
9.6
|
41.4
|
1.4
|
|
|
Inferred (Inf)
|
97,832,000
|
1.8
|
1,774,000
|
9.3
|
9.6
|
38.0
|
1.2
|
|
|
Total M+I+Inf
|
445,695,000
|
2.1
|
9,163,000
|
10.4
|
9.6
|
40.8
|
1.4
|
|
|
Notes to accompany mineral resource table:
1. Mineral
Resources are reported using the definitions set out in the 2012 JORC Code and are current as at June 4, 2026. Mineral Resources are reported on an in-situ basis, inclusive of Ore Reserves.
2. The
Competent Person responsible for the estimate is John Eckman.
3. Mineral
Resources are reported within a conceptual pit shell that uses the key assumptions summarized in the Report in the Appendix.
4. Mineral
Resources are reported above a cut-off grade of 0.4% THM.
5. Estimates have been rounded.
|
||||||||
|
Parameters
|
Unit
|
Value
|
||
|
Production rate
|
ton/year
|
3,529,000 to 10,588,000
|
||
|
Production schedule
|
Hours/Year
|
8760
|
||
|
Production schedule efficiency
|
%
|
85
|
||
|
Ramp grade
|
%
|
10
|
||
|
Mining recovery factors:
|
||||
|
Rutile
|
%
|
70.6 (81.2% mineral in product)
|
||
|
Ilmenite
|
%
|
85.0 (95.8% mineral in product)
|
||
|
Heavy rare earth concentrate
|
%
|
89.5 (87.8% mineral in product)
|
||
|
Zircon
|
%
|
91.2 (46.9% mineral in product)
|
||
|
Pit Loss/Dilution
|
%
|
10 (in addition to low-grade interburden)
|
|
Ore Reserve
Estimate
|
ROM tons
|
THM
|
THM
|
THM Assemblage
|
||||||
|
Zircon
|
Rutile
|
Ilmenite
|
REE
|
|||||||
|
Unit
|
Proved
|
Probable
|
Total
|
(%)
|
(t)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
|
|
Upper McNairy
|
24,565,000
|
2,415,000
|
26,980,000
|
2.30
|
620,000
|
6.2
|
6.2
|
23.6
|
0.2
|
|
|
Lower McNairy
|
68,740,000
|
21,307,000
|
90,047,000
|
3.43
|
3,086,000
|
12.7
|
10.5
|
48.3
|
1.9
|
|
|
Total
|
93,306,000
|
23,722,000
|
117,027,000
|
3.17
|
3,706,000
|
11.6
|
9.8
|
44.2
|
1.6
|
|
|
Notes to accompany ore reserve table:
1. Ore
Reserves are reported using the definitions set out in the 2012 JORC Code and are current as at June 4, 2026. Ore Reserves are reported at the point of delivery to the process plant.
2. The
Competent Person responsible for the estimate is Justin Douthat.
3. Ore
Reserves are reported within a finalized mine design pit shell that uses the key assumptions summarized in the Report in the Appendix above.
4. Ore
Reserves are reported above a cut-off grade of 0.85% THM.
5. Ilmenite
includes leucoxene, pseudorutile, and ilmenite and REE includes monazite, xenotime, and unclassified REE.
6. Estimates
have been rounded.
|


| ■ |
Mining Unit Plant (MUP)
|
| ■ |
Feed Preparation Plant (FPP)
|
| ■ |
Wet Concentrator Plant (WCP)
|
| ■ |
Concentrate Upgrade Plant (CUP)
|
| ■ |
Tailing Dewatering Circuit (TDC)
|
| ■ |
Rare Earth Plant (REP)
|
| ■ |
Mineral Separation Plant (MSP)
|




|
Titan DFS Product Suite
|
Key Specification
|
DFS Design Value
|
|
|
Ilmenite
|
TiO2 content
|
62.5%
|
|
|
Rutile
|
TiO2 content
|
91.1%
|
|
|
Zircon concentrate
|
ZrO2 content
|
34.4%
|
|
|
Heavy Rare Earth Concentrate
|
Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO)
|
61.4%
|
|
CeO₂
|
Dy₂O₃
|
Er₂O₃
|
Eu₂O₃
|
Gd₂O₃
|
Ho₂O₃
|
La₂O₃
|
Lu₂O₃
|
Nd₂O₃
|
|
25.15
|
0.9
|
0.39
|
0.16
|
1.49
|
0.16
|
11.72
|
0.04
|
11.3
|
|
Pr₆O₁₁
|
Sc₂O₃
|
Sm₂O₃
|
Tb₄O₇
|
Tm₂O₃
|
Y₂O₃
|
Yb₂O₃
|
TREO
|
|
|
3.08
|
0.004
|
2.05
|
0.2
|
0.05
|
4.39
|
0.32
|
61.4
|
|
|
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
|
||||||||
|
Titan DFS Products LOM Average Price
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
|
Ilmenite price
|
US$/t
|
353
|
|
|
Rutile price
|
US$/t
|
1,471
|
|
|
Zircon concentrate price
|
US$/t
|
829
|
|
|
HREC price
|
US$/t
|
41,759
|
|
Item
|
Phase 1
400tph
(US$)
|
Phase 2 –
Incremental 800tph
(US$)
|
Total
Phase 1+ Phase 2
(US$)
|
|
|
Direct Costs
|
||||
|
1000 - Site Wide - Mining
|
$23,237,857
|
$347,042
|
$23,584,929
|
|
|
1000 - Site Wide - non-process infrastructure
|
$18,316,630
|
$0
|
$18,316,630
|
|
|
1000 - Site Wide - Balance of Scope
|
$18,499,189
|
$3,191,001
|
$21,690,190
|
|
|
2000 - Feed Preparation Plant
|
$10,086,726
|
$15,587,107
|
$25,673,833
|
|
|
3000 - Wet Concentrator Plant
|
$44,143,921
|
$62,212,480
|
$106,356,401
|
|
|
4000 - Mineral Separation Plant
|
$25,058,422
|
$33,435,617
|
$58,494,039
|
|
|
5000 - Rare Earth Plant
|
$33,181,069
|
$1,240,555
|
$34,421,625
|
|
|
8000 - Mining Unit Plant
|
$1,304,793
|
$2,133,248
|
$3,438,041
|
|
|
Direct Costs Sub-total
|
$173,828,608
|
$118,147,079
|
$291,975,688
|
|
|
Indirect Costs
|
||||
|
EPCM
|
$22,414,018
|
$14,663,588
|
$37,077,606
|
|
|
Temporary Facilities and Services
|
$2,240,370
|
$1,247,800
|
$3,488,170
|
|
|
Vendor's ME Installation Assistance
|
$250,000
|
$190,000
|
$440,000
|
|
|
Contractor's Pre-Commissioning Assistance
|
$186,342
|
$244,769
|
$431,111
|
|
|
Commissioning & Testing
|
$1,898,000
|
$1,620,320
|
$3,518,320
|
|
|
Spare Parts
|
$928,893
|
$1,196,017
|
$2,124,910
|
|
|
First Fills
|
$143,330
|
$223,407
|
$366,737
|
|
|
Indirect Costs Sub-total
|
$28,060,953
|
$19,385,901
|
$47,446,854
|
|
|
Total, excl. Contingency and Owner’s Costs
|
$201,889,562
|
$137,532,980
|
$339,422,542
|
|
|
Owner's Costs
|
$5,598,338
|
$1,637,627
|
$7,235,964
|
|
|
Contingency
|
$20,638,419
|
$14,027,432
|
$34,665,851
|
|
|
Total CAPEX, 400tph and 800tph
|
$228,126,319
|
$153,198,038
|
$381,324,357
|
|
|
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
|
||||
|
Operating Costs
|
US$/year
|
US$/t ore
|
|||
|
Phase 1 Average
|
Phase 2 Average
|
Phase 1 Average
|
Phase 2 Average
|
||
|
Mining
|
21,505,614
|
64,334,874
|
6.32
|
6.22
|
|
|
Process Plant
|
15,520,852
|
27,967,350
|
4.56
|
2.70
|
|
|
Product Transport
|
3,558,600
|
8,900,738
|
1.05
|
0.86
|
|
|
Royalties
|
4,747,628
|
8,052,134
|
1.39
|
0.78
|
|
|
Total Operating Costs
|
45,332,694
|
109,255,096
|
13.31
|
10.57
|
|
|
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
|
|||||
|
Financial Forecast
|
Units
|
Value
|
|
|
Total EBITDA
|
US$ million
|
2,804
|
|
|
Pre-Tax NPV8
|
US$ million
|
1,016
|
|
|
Pre-Tax IRR
|
%
|
42.6
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Payback Period
|
Year
|
3.49
|
|
|
After-Tax NPV8
|
US$ million
|
813
|
|
|
After-Tax IRR
|
%
|
39.4
|
|
|
After-Tax Payback Period
|
Year
|
3.63
|
|
|
NPV/Initial Capital
|
3.56
|
||
|
NPV/Total Capital
|
2.13
|



|
Key Milestones
|
Target Date
|
|
|
Early Contractor Involvement Start
|
July 2026
|
|
|
Phase 1 Construction Start
|
January 2027
|
|
|
Phase 1 Modular Plant Procurement Start
|
January 2027
|
|
|
Phase 1 Commissioning Start
|
June 2028
|
|
|
Phase 1 Production Ramp Up Complete
|
September 2028
|
|
|
Phase 2 Construction Start
|
June 2031
|
|
|
Phase 2 Production Ramp Up Complete
|
September 2032
|
| ■ |
Expansion of the study area through additional drilling, mine planning and permitting.
|
| ■ |
Potential development of adjacent properties, subject to drilling, resource definition, mine planning, permitting and economic analysis.
|
| ■ |
Processing optimization, including recovery improvements, product quality improvements, reagent optimization, water management optimization and potential downstream integration.
|
| ■ |
Modular execution and procurement optimization to reduce construction schedule risk and improve capital efficiency.
|
| ■ |
Additional offtake, strategic investment, government financing or partnership opportunities aligned with U.S. critical minerals and titanium supply chain priorities.
|
| ■ |
Integration with IperionX’s titanium technologies and U.S. manufacturing strategy, subject to technical, commercial and regulatory assessment.
|